Dynamic Energy Budget Theory - I

33
Dynamic Energy Budget Theory - I Tânia Sousa with contributions from : Tjalling Yager & Bas Kooijman

description

Dynamic Energy Budget Theory - I. Tânia Sousa with contributions from :Tjalling Yager & Bas Kooijman. Environmental Applications. Toxicology Which is the toxicity of the environmental concentration of a compound? Which are the toxic effects of a compound? Climate Change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Dynamic Energy Budget Theory - I

Page 1: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Dynamic Energy Budget Theory - I

Tânia Sousa with contributions from : Tjalling Yager & Bas Kooijman

Page 2: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Toxicology

Which is the toxicity of the environmental concentration of a compound?

Which are the toxic effects of a compound?

Climate Change Will an increase in 1ºC have a

drastic impact on the distribution range of a species?

Waste water treatment plant What are the necessary conditions

to mantain an healthy microbian comunity in the biological reactors?

Environmental Applications

Page 3: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Human-made toxicants

Wide variety of uses paints, detergents, solvents, pesticides,

pharmaceuticals, polymers, … probably some 100.000 compounds

Chemical industry is BIG business! production value 2009: 3.4 trillion

dollar (3.400.000.000.000 $) equals the GDP of Germany

All are toxic, some are intended to kill fungicides, insecticides, herbicides,

nematicides, molluscicides, …

Page 4: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Human-made & natural toxicant

Dioxins e.g., 2,3,7,8-TCDD human: paper and fiber bleaching, incineration

of waste, metal smelting, cigarette smoke natural: incomplete combustion of chlorine-

containing things

Page 5: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Human-made vs. natural

What is the difference? Time scale

major increase after second world war rapid development of new types of molecules

Spatial scale amounts emitted landscape and even global instead of local

Since 1970’s, most countries have programmes for environmental protection ...

Page 6: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Daphnia reproduction test OECD guideline 211

Ecotoxicology

Page 7: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Reproduction test

Page 8: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Reproduction test

Page 9: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Reproduction test

wait for 21 days …

Page 10: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Range of Concentrations

Page 11: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Dose-response plot

EC50

tota

l off

spri

ng

log concentration

NOEC

Page 12: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

If EC50 is the answer …… what was the question?“What is the concentration of chemical X that

leads to 50% effect on the total number of offspring of Daphnia magna (Straus) after 21-day constant exposure under standardised laboratory conditions?”

What does this answer tell me about other situations? (almost) nothing! EC50EC50

tota

loffs

prin

g

log concentration

Page 13: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Organisms are complex…

Response to stress depends on organism (species, life stage, sex, …) endpoint (size, reproduction, development, …) type of stressor (toxicant, radiation, parasites,

…) exposure scenario (pulsed, multiple stress, …) environmental conditions (temperature, food,

…) etc., etc.

Page 14: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

E.g., effect on reproduction

Page 15: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

E.g., effect on reproduction

Page 16: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

E.g., effect on reproduction

Page 17: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

E.g., effect on reproduction

Page 18: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

E.g., effect on reproduction

To understand an effect on reproduction …• need to know how food is used to make offspring• and how chemicals interfere with this process

Page 19: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Why is DEB important for

toxicity? The use of DEB theory allows extrapolation of

toxicity test results to other situations and other species

To study the effects of toxicity on life-history traits, DEB follows naturally food is used to fuel all traits over the life cycle toxicants affect DEB parameters should allow extrapolation to untested

conditions it is valuable for environmental risk assessment

Page 20: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

It captures the quantitative aspects of

metabolism at the individual level for all species

Why the hope for generality? universality of physics and evolution

Entropy production is >=0 widespread biological empirical patterns

What is DEB theory?

Page 21: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

A widespread biological empirical

fact: Von Bertalanffy growth

trb

BeLLLtL )()(

Growth as a function of time

Depends on length at birth, maximum length and growth rate

It was proposed in 1938 by Von Bertalanffy an austrian biologist

Page 22: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Consistency with other scientific knowledge

(thermodynamics, evolution, etc) Consistency with empirical data Life-cycle approach: embryo, juvenile and

adult

Occam’s razor: the general model should be as simple as possible (and not more)

Basic concepts in DEB Theory

Page 23: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Metabolism in a DEB

individual. The boundary of the

organism Rectangles are state

variables

A DEB organism

ME - Reserve

MV - StructureMH - Maturity

Page 24: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

What defines a DEB organism?

Biomass Mv - Mass of Reserve ME - Mass of Structure

Life-Cycle approach: different life stages MH - Level of Maturity (it represents neither mass

nor energy)

What about other possibles state variables such as age?

DEB model: the State Variables

Page 25: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

These gouramis are from the same nest, they have the same age and lived in the same tankSocial interaction during feeding caused the huge size differenceAge-based models for growth are bound to fail; growth depends on food intake

Not age, but size Trichopsis vittatus

Page 26: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Strong homeostasis

Reserve & Structure have constant aggregated chemical composition

Weak homeostasis At constant food organisms tend to constant

aggregated chemical composition

DEB model: Reserve and Structure

Why more than 1 state variable to define the biomass? The aggregated chemical composition of organisms is not constant

– it changes with the growth rate Why not use thousands of chemical species to define the

organism? Two are sufficient (in animals and bacteria) to capture the change

in aggregated chemical composition with the growth rate Strong & Weak homeostasis -> higher control over metabolism

Page 27: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Life Stages (dark blue) and transitions (light

blue)

Essential switch points for metabolic behavior Birth (start of feeding) Puberty (start of allocation to reproduction)

Switch points sometimes in reversed order (aphids)

DEB model: Maturity

embryo juvenile adult

fertilization birth puberty deathweaning

baby infant

MHb- threshold of maturity at birth

MHp- threshold of maturity at puberty

Page 28: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Notation 1

Page 29: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Indices for compounds

Indices for transformations

General

Notation 2

Page 30: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Metabolism in a DEB

individual. Rectangles are state

variables Arrows are flows of food

JXA, reserve JEA, JEC, JEM, JET , JEG, JER, JEJ or structure JVG.

Circles are processes

A DEB organism

ME - Reserve

MV - Structure

Feeding

MH - Maturity

XAJ EAJ

Assimilation

Page 31: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Feeding: the uptake of food Assimilation: conversion of substrate (food,

nutrients, light) into reserve(s) Depends on substrate availability & structural

surface area (e.g. surface area of the gut)

Feeding & Assimilation

Empirical pattern: the heat increment of feeding suggests that there are processes only associated with food processing

Strong homeostasis imposes a fixed conversion efficiency Consistency with other fields: mass transfer is proportional to area

- surface maximum assimilation rate -yield of reserve on food

Page 32: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Intra-taxon predation: efficient conversion

yEX a high yield of reserve on food

Hemiphractus fasciatusis a frog-eating frog

Beroe spis a comb jelly-eating comb jelly

Solaster papposus is a starfish-eating starfish

Chrysaora hysoscella is a jelly fish-eating jelly fish

Euspira catena is a snail-eating snail

Coluber constrictor is a snake-eating snake

Page 33: Dynamic Energy  Budget  Theory  - I

Asplanchna girodiis a rotifer-eating rotifer

Didinium nasutumis a ciliate-eating ciliate

Esox lucius is a fish-eating fish

Enallagma carunculatum is a insect-eating insect

Falco peregrinus is a bird-eating bird

Acinonyx jubatus is a mammal-eating mammal

Intra-taxon predation: efficient conversionyEX a high yield of reserve on food