DWS Invest - deutsche-bank.pt · DWS Invest European Value (formerly: ... form of the global...

550
DWS Invest Annual Report 2012 Investment Company with Variable Capital Incorporated under Luxembourg Law 1/2013

Transcript of DWS Invest - deutsche-bank.pt · DWS Invest European Value (formerly: ... form of the global...

  • DWS InvestAnnual Report 2012

    Investment Company with Variable Capital Incorporated under Luxembourg Law

    1/20

    13

  • 1

    Contents

    Annual report 2012

    for the period from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012

    Equity and bond markets 4

    General information 8

    Annual report DWS Invest SICAV

    DWS Concept ets (formerly: DWS Invest Multi Asset Momentum) 12

    DWS Invest Africa 14

    DWS Invest Alpha Opportunities 16

    DWS Invest Alpha Strategy 18

    DWS Invest Asia Pacific ex-Japan 20

    DWS Invest Asian Small/Mid Cap 22

    DWS Invest Brazilian Equities 24

    DWS Invest BRIC Plus 26

    DWS Invest China Bonds 28

    DWS Invest Chinese Equities 30

    DWS Invest Clean Tech 32

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus 34

    DWS Invest Convertibles 36

    DWS Invest Diversified Fixed Income Strategy 38

    DWS Invest DYMOND (formerly: DWS Invest Multi Asset Balance) 40

    DWS Invest Emerging Markets Corporates 41

    DWS Invest Emerging Markets Satellites 43

    DWS Invest Emerging Markets Top Dividend Plus 45

    DWS Invest Euro Bonds (Premium) 47

    DWS Invest Euro Bonds (Short) 49

    DWS Invest Euro Corporate Bonds 51

    DWS Invest Euro-Gov Bonds 53

    DWS Invest Euro High Yield Corporates 55

    DWS Invest European Bonds 57

    DWS Invest European Equities 59

    DWS Invest European Small/Mid Cap 61

    DWS Invest European Value (formerly: DWS Invest Top Dividend Europe) 63

    DWS Invest German Equities 65

    DWS Invest Global Agribusiness 67

    DWS Invest Global Bonds 69

    2012

  • 2

    DWS Invest Global Equities 71

    DWS Invest Global ex Japan (USD) 73

    DWS Invest Global Inflation Linked Bonds 75

    DWS Invest Global Inflation Strategy 77

    DWS Invest Global Infrastructure 79

    DWS Invest Global Thematic 81

    DWS Invest Global Value 83

    DWS Invest Gold and Precious Metals Equties 85

    DWS Invest Government Liquidity Fund 87

    DWS Invest Income Strategy Conservative 89

    DWS Invest Income Strategy Currency 91

    DWS Invest Income Strategy Dynamic 92

    DWS Invest Income Strategy Plus 93

    DWS Invest Income Strategy Systematic 94

    DWS Invest Italian Equities 95

    DWS Invest Japanese Equities 97

    DWS Invest Latin American Equities (formerly: DWS Invest Tarvos) 98

    DWS Invest Local Emerging Markets Bonds 100

    DWS Invest Multi Asset Allocation 101

    DWS Invest New Resources 103

    DWS Invest Real Assets 105

    DWS Invest Responsibility 107

    DWS Invest RREEF Asia-Pacific Real Estate Securities 109

    DWS Invest RREEF Global Real Estate Securities 111

    DWS Invest Short Duration Credit 113

    DWS Invest Small/Mid Cap Value 115

    DWS Invest Sovereigns Plus 117

    DWS Invest StepIn Akkumula 119

    DWS Invest Top 50 Asia 121

    DWS Invest Top Dividend 123

    DWS Invest Top Dividend Premium 125

    DWS Invest Top Euroland 127

    DWS Invest US-Gov Bonds 129

    DWS Invest US Value Equities 130

    Investment portfolios for the reporting period

    Investment portfolios, financial statements and statement

    of changes in net assets 134

    Report of the Rviseur dEntreprises agr 544

  • Equity and bond markets

  • 4

    Equity markets in the fiscal year through December 31, 2012

    Equity markets impacted

    by the debt crisis

    From the start of 2012 through the end

    of December 2012, prices in the

    international equity markets rose

    appreciably on balance. Even though

    economic growth in the emerging-

    market countries, particularly in China,

    Brazil and India, was no longer as

    pronounced as it had been in previous

    years, the economies of export-strong

    Western states performed solidly.

    These included the United States and

    Germany, in particular. In both coun-

    tries, the primary impetus no longer

    came predominantly from exports but

    also increasingly from internal demand.

    Temporary phases of weakness in the

    capital markets were primarily the

    result of the sovereign debt crisis in

    the euro periphery. As part of its expan-

    sive monetary policy, the European

    Central Bank (ECB) announced that it

    would buy the government bonds of

    crisis-stricken eurozone countries for

    an unlimited time and in an unlimited

    volume in order to pave a way out of

    the high level of debt and bring about

    the start of a normalization in Europe.

    This boosted equity prices in the

    second half of 2012 as much as the

    hope of progress in relation to the U.S.

    budgetary consolidation (the fiscal

    cliff) did towards the end of the year.

    Additional impetus came from the

    agreement among international

    investors to rescue Greece. Overall,

    the MSCI World index recorded strong

    appreciation of 15.5% in U.S. dollar

    terms over the 12-month period

    (+12.8% in euro terms). At sector level,

    high-growth industrials and consumer

    goods that were well positioned

    worldwide, in particular, made

    above-average gains in the reporting

    period.

    U.S. equities profited from an improve-

    ment in economic data, with recover-

    ies in the U.S. housing and employ-

    ment markets for example. Further

    support came from a positive develop-

    ment in consumer figures in the U.S.

    and from economic development,

    which was generally robust. In

    addition, the prospect of further

    stimulus measures from the U.S.

    Federal Reserve helped the perfor-

    mance of prices in the equity market,

    which also benefited from a realloca-

    tion of European assets to U.S.

    equities against the backdrop of the

    debt crisis in Europe. While the clear

    outcome of the presidential elections

    in the U.S. provided a tailwind, the

    issue of government debt still created

    uncertainty among market participants.

    U.S. equities as measured by the

    S&P 500 index recorded a gain of

    15.3% in U.S. dollar terms (+12.6% in

    euro) in the reporting period.

    In Europe, the equity markets in

    countries where state budgets were

    comparatively well managed and which

    featured a broad spectrum of equities

    from high-growth companies with a

    good position in world markets posted

    an above average performance. These

    included Germany in particular. Many

    companies were buoyed here by their

    strong international competitiveness.

    The DAX rose robustly in the reporting

    period by 29.1% in euro terms. In

    contrast, the financially-weak, highly-

    indebted countries of Southern Europe,

    with their growth concerns, recorded

    only relatively low price gains or even

    significant losses. For example, Italian

    equities, as measured by the FTSE

    MIB, posted a gain of 7.1%. The

    Spanish market fell by 5.1% (IBEX 35).

    With a gain of 17.7%, the EURO

    STOXX 50 index outperformed the

    broader, Europe-wide STOXX

    18.6(in U.S. dollars)

    International equity marketsin the 2012 fiscal yearPerformance in %

    DAXSTOXX Europe 50S&P 500

    TOPIX

    MSCI World

    MSCI EmergingMarkets

    29.1

    12.615.3

    12.620.9

    6.3

    12.8

    15.9

    15 350

    In local currencyin euro

    Equity indices:Germany: DAX Europe: STOXX Europe 50 U.S.: S&P 500 Japan: TOPIX worldwide: MSCI World emerging markets: MSCI Emerging Markets

    10 20

    15.5(in U.S. dollars)

    25 305

    Strong market movementsover a five-year period

    130115100

    85705540

    Equity indices:

    STOXX Europe 50

    S&P 500 TOPIX DAX

    Data on euro basis* December 28, 2007 = 100

    STOXX is a registeredtrademark of STOXXLimited; DAX is aregistered trademark ofDeutsche Brse AG

    12/1112/07* 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/12

    Japan

    U.S.

    EuropeGermany

  • 5

    Europe 50 index, which gained 12.6%

    (both percentages in euro terms).

    The Japanese equity market too was

    able to participate in price increases, as

    a result of improved sentiment in the

    capital markets, and profited from a

    relaxation of the situation in Europe

    and from the monetary policy meas-

    ures taken by the Japanese central

    bank. The appreciation of the yen

    continued to pose a burden initially;

    however the weakening of the

    currency as the year progressed gave

    the Japanese equity market a positive

    boost and had a positive impact on the

    performance of the equities of

    export-oriented companies in particular.

    As measured by the TOPIX index,

    Japanese equities recorded a gain of

    20.9% in the local currency during the

    twelve months through the end of

    December 2012 (+6.3% in euro terms).

    In the emerging markets, the

    economic climate cooled appreciably,

    although still remained the strongest

    by global comparison. This was not

    solely down to global influences. In

    China, for example, the state applied

    the brakes to the real estate sector. As

    part of this, fewer infrastructural

    projects were given the go-ahead. In

    addition, the number of building

    permits was reduced. Restrictions

    were also imposed on lending in this

    sector. Brazilian growth also eased

    noticeably. Reduced Chinese demand

    for commodities put a dampener on

    exports here. As in some other

    emerging-market countries, the central

    bank deployed measures to ease

    monetary policy with the aim of

    stimulating the domestic economy. In

    India, growth slowed due to markedly

    increasing inflation, among other

    factors. Viewed as a whole, however,

    the comparatively robust economic

    performance in combination with the

    relatively low levels of debt encour-

    aged investment in the emerging-

    market countries. On balance, the

    MSCI Emerging Markets index

    recorded appreciation of 15.9% in

    euro terms. The MSCI BRIC however

    gained only 12.2% likewise in

    euro terms in this climate.

    Strong fluctuations in

    gold and crude oil

    The price of gold experienced strong

    fluctuations in the reporting period of

    between 1550 and 1800 U.S. dollars

    per troy ounce approximately. Gold

    was particularly exposed to the

    influence of the expansive monetary

    policy of the central banks in Western

    industrial countries, in light of the debt

    crisis combined with the associated

    negative real interest rates and

    increasing inflation concerns. On the

    other hand, significant corrections

    occurred at times, due to fears of

    globally weak growth. On balance, the

    troy ounce of gold posted a gain of

    around 6% in the twelve months

    through the end of December 2012.

    Crude oil too displayed considerable

    price fluctuations. The overall robust

    form of the global economy was a

    factor in rising prices. In the meantime,

    the oil embargo against Iran led to a

    significant increase. However, as soon

    as the sovereign debt problem in the

    euro area reared its head, a consider-

    able drop occurred, due to heightened

    fears of a recession. In addition, the

    historically high U.S. inventory

    dampened the price, which, on

    balance, fell in 2012 by around 7% to

    approximately 92 U.S. dollars per barrel

    (WTI). On the currency side, the euro

    gained 2.0% against the greenback in

    the year through the end of December

    2012. Hopes of a stabilization in the

    euro area as well as the significant

    monetary easing by the Fed boosted

    the euro. The U.S. dollar had to

    relinquish its relative strength against

    the euro due to capital outflows, which

    were considerable at times. However,

    the euro was prone to weakness in the

    first half of the fiscal year in light of the

    Spanish banking crisis and constantly

    recurring speculation that Greece

    would leave the euro.

    Change in oil pricesince the end of 2010USD/barrel

    120110100

    908070

    Oil price (WTI) Source: ThomsonFinancial Datastream

    12/10 12/11 6/126/11 12/12

  • 6

    Bond markets in the fiscal year through December 31, 2012

    Capital markets under the sway

    of the debt crisis

    The performance in the international

    capital markets in 2012 was character-

    ized by uncertainty, mainly triggered by

    the sovereign debt crisis, predominant-

    ly in the euro area and in the United

    States, and the global economic

    slowdown. While the U.S. economy

    showed relatively modest growth,

    clouds gathered over the European

    economy. The comparatively robust

    economic growth in the emerging-

    market countries, particularly China and

    India, slowed considerably. This difficult

    fundamental environment, along with

    with the debt problems in the euro

    peripheral countries which escalated

    into the summer months, especially in

    heavily-indebted Greece, as well as the

    banking crisis in Spain initially had a

    negative impact on the capital markets.

    Investor risk aversion was very high

    until summer 2012 as a result.

    Reputable interest-bearing instruments,

    such as German and Swiss govern-

    ment bonds, which were considered

    safe havens for investment, profited

    from this trend. In order to prevent a

    credit crunch, the European Central

    Bank (ECB) held fast to its expansive

    monetary policy, most recently

    expressed by its willingness to

    purchase additional bonds. As a result,

    the crisis in the euro area eased

    considerably from August through the

    end of 2012. This trend and the climate

    of all-time low interest rates encour-

    aged investors to search for higher

    yields. The resulting surge in prices

    enabled the capital markets to record

    impressive gains over the year.

    Significant price recovery

    in the euro periphery

    The sovereign debt crisis in the euro area,

    which began in April 2010 with the Greek

    financial crisis, expanded in the subse-

    quent period to include the euro countries

    Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain. The

    measures taken by the European Union

    (EU) and the International Monetary Fund

    (IMF) initially failed to have the desired

    impact and only had temporary stabilizing

    effects. Instead, the financial markets

    remained skeptical that the consolidation

    efforts by the euro peripheral countries

    would be successful, especially in the

    Southern European debtor countries.

    Alongside Greece, Spain also increasingly

    attracted attention. Not only the weak-

    ness of the euro areas fourth largest

    economy, but also the crisis in the

    Spanish banking sector, which required

    government intervention, further reduced

    the confidence of market participants and

    initially increased the pressure on the

    bonds of financially weak euro states.

    However, since ECB president Draghi

    announced at the end of July 2012 that

    the European Central Bank would do all

    that was necessary to uphold the euro,

    prices on bonds of the euro periphery

    countries rose noticeably, albeit to varying

    degrees. Consequently, with the

    exception of Spain, this brought about an

    appreciable reduction in their risk

    premiums in the second half of the year.

    Ultimately, the bond markets of Ireland,

    Italy, Portugal and above all Greece were

    able to record a noticeable to strong gain

    on an annual basis. In September 2012

    this development was backed up by the

    German Federal Constitutional Court

    ruling that enabled Germany to join the

    European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and

    become involved in the fiscal pact. In

    addition, at the beginning of September

    the ECB indicated its willingness to buy

    unlimited government bonds of financially

    weak euro countries, in order to ensure

    that the central banks would pursue a

    uniform monetary policy in all countries of

    the euro area. However, the countries

    concerned would then be subject to strict

    controls of the European Financial

    Stability Facility. This announcement by

    the ECB gave particular momentum to the

    previously tarnished bonds from the euro

    periphery. On balance, this investment

    segment fared better as a result than

    bond investments in the low interest-rate

    core markets, for example Germany.

    Economic growth in the U.S., the euro area, Japan, the BRIC countries(Brazil, Russia, India, China) and the worldEconomic growth compared to the previous year

    10.0%

    8.0%

    6.0%

    4.0%

    2.0%

    0.0%

    -0.0%

    * EstimatesSource: Deutsche Bank

    2011 2013*2012

    U.S.Euro areaJapan

    BRIC countries:BrazilRussiaIndiaChina

    World

  • 7

    Corporate bonds displaying

    a sharp price increase

    The corporate bonds markets recorded

    significant price increases overall with

    fluctuations. The initial reticence of

    investors was replaced in the second half

    of the year with increasing interest from

    investors seeking higher yields com-

    pared to government bonds. This

    culminated in a price rally for corporate

    bonds. This development was also

    supported by a reduction in debt at

    company level and the positive refinanc-

    ing opportunities due to the low

    interest-rate policy pursued by central

    banks. Over the year, high-yield bonds in

    particular, but also corporate bonds with

    ratings of BBB and higher by leading

    rating agencies outperformed compara-

    ble government bonds on balance.

    Bonds of core countries

    with historically low interest rates

    In the search for safe investments,

    investors took refuge, for instance, in

    government bonds of core markets, e.g.

    from Germany, Switzerland and the U.S.

    As a result, yields on these bonds, which

    were already low by international

    comparison continued to fall and reached

    all-time lows at times, while prices rose.

    For example, the yield on German

    government bonds with a term to

    maturity of ten years was at a record low

    of 1.13% p.a. on July 23, 2012. Later in

    the period, however, a slight upturn set

    in, not least in light of the ECB announce-

    ment that it would purchase unlimited

    bonds of financially weak euro countries.

    Overall, in the 10-year maturity segment,

    yields on German government bonds fell

    from 1.8% to 1.3% p.a., U.S. government

    bonds from 1.9% to 1.8% p.a. and Swiss

    government bonds from 0.7% to

    0.6% p.a. during the fiscal year through

    the end of December 2012. After the

    previous slight rise, yields on Japanese

    government bonds were back down to

    considerably below the one-percent

    mark, most recently 0.8% p.a. from

    May to the end of December 2012.

    Given the high levels of uncertainty in

    the capital markets, investors in German

    government bonds, one of the few

    European countries with an AAA rating

    from the leading ratings agencies, even

    accepted negative real interest rates in

    the end, on the basis of the inflation rate

    as at the reporting date.

    Recent recovery of the euro

    The government debt crisis in the euro

    periphery, combined with the discussion

    on Greece potentially leaving the

    European Monetary Union and the

    Spanish banking crisis, resulted in

    considerable currency reallocations by

    international investors. As a result, the

    European common currency came under

    significant pressure in the first half of

    2012. It was listed at USD 1.2085 at the

    end of July, a decline of 6.6% since the

    beginning of the year. From August 2012,

    however, hopes of a stabilization in the

    euro area and the considerable monetary

    easing by the Fed boosted the euro,

    which then more than recouped its

    previous losses. On balance, the euro

    gained 2.0% against the greenback in

    2012. The U.S. dollar had to relinquish its

    relative strength against the euro due to

    capital outflows, which were consider-

    able at times. The reasons for this

    included the high U.S. federal deficit and

    the continued weakness in economic

    growth in the U.S. In September 2012,

    the latter caused the Fed to launch a

    major bond purchasing program for the

    third time since the outbreak of the

    financial crisis. Accordingly, it intends to

    purchase unlimited mortgage bonds for

    USD 40 billion a month in future. In

    addition, it aims to retain its low interest

    policy (target range: 0.00-0.25% p.a.)

    until 2015. The Bank of Japan continued

    its virtually zero-interest policy and

    expanded its bond purchasing program

    in order to ease the pressure on Japans

    export-oriented economy. At the end of

    2012, the value of the yen against the

    euro was 12.6% weaker than in the

    previous year.

    Risk premiums with respectto German government bondsfor ten-year government bondsfrom the euro periphery

    % points

    42

    35

    28

    21

    14

    7

    0

    Source: ThomsonFinancial Datastream

    PortugalItalyIrelandGreeceSpain

    12/09 12/1212/1112/106/10 6/11 6/12

  • 8

    General information

    The funds described in this report

    are sub-funds of a SICAV (Socit

    dInvestissement Capital Variable)

    incorporated under Luxembourg law.

    Performance

    The investment return, or performance,

    of a mutual fund investment is

    meas ured by the change in value of the

    funds shares. The net asset values per

    share (= redemption prices) with the

    addition of intervening distributions,

    which are, for example, reinvested free

    of charge within the scope of invest-

    ment accounts at DWS, are used as

    the basis for calculating the value.

    Performance is calculated according to

    the BVI method (used by the BVI, the

    main German investment fund industry

    association), i.e., excluding the initial

    sales charge. Past performance is not

    a guide to future results. The 63 sub-

    funds currently offered are available in

    up to 13 share classes (described in

    this report). This may give rise to

    differences in the performance of the

    respective share classes. The corre-

    sponding benchmarks if available

    are also presented in the report.

    All financial data in this publication is

    as of December 31, 2012 unless

    otherwise stated. For the realized gains

    or losses reported in the financial

    statements or in the statement of

    changes in net assets of the respective

    sub-funds, positive and negative results

    within the same product category are

    netted in each case; across product

    categories, negative or positive result

    balances on a gross basis are reported

    as the realized loss or gain.

    In accordance with the sales prospec-

    tus, the expenses detailed in item 12(b)

    are limited to 15% p.a. (for mixed

    funds, bond funds and equity funds)

    and 7.5% p.a. (for money market

    funds). If this expense cap is exceeded,

    the management fee shown in the

    statement of income and expenses

    is reduced accordingly.

    Sales prospectuses

    Sub-fund shares are purchased on the

    basis of the current sales prospectus,

    the by-laws of the SICAV and the

    key investor information document

    in combination with the latest audited

    annual report and any semiannual

    report that is more recent than the

    latest annual report.

    Publication of the net asset

    value per share and of the

    issue and redemption prices

    The respective net asset values

    per share, the current issue and

    redemption prices including the initial

    sales charge and the redemption fee,

    as well as all other information for

    shareholders may be requested at any

    time at the registered office of the

    Management Company and from the

    paying agents. In addition, depending

    on customary market practice, the net

    asset values per share and/or the issue

    and redemption prices are also

    published in every country of distribu-

    tion through appropriate media (such

    as the Internet, electronic information

    systems, newspapers, etc.).

  • 9

    Liquidations of share classes of sub-funds

    The DS1H share class of the sub-fund DWS Invest Alpha Opportunities was closed effective December 19, 2012, by resolution of the management authorized by the Board of Directors of DWS Investment S.A.

    The DS1H, A2H and E2H share classes of the sub-fund DWS Invest Alpha Strategy were closed effective December 19, 2012, by resolution of the management authorized by the Board of Directors of DWS Investment S.A.

    Renamed sub-funds

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Multi Asset Balance was renamed DWS Invest DYMOND effective April 1, 2012.

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Top Dividend Europe was renamed DWS Invest European Value effective April 1, 2012.

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Multi Asset Momentum was renamed DWS Concept ets effective April 1, 2012.

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Tarvos was renamed DWS Latin American Equities effective October 1, 2012.

    Renamed share classes

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Top Dividend: The share classes A2H, CH2H and CH4H were renamed A2H (P), CH2H (P) and CH4H (P) effective April 1, 2012.

    The sub-fund DWS Invest US Value Equities: The share classes LCH and NCH were renamed LCH (P) and NCH (P) effective April 1, 2012.

    Mergers of SICAV-external funds with sub-funds of the SICAV

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Institutional Euro Corporate Bonds of the SICAV DWS Institutional was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Euro Corporate Bonds (LD share class) effective July 16, 2012. The exchange factor was 102.6397847.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the fund DWS Euro-Corp High Yield was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Euro High Yield Corporates (LD share class) effective July 30, 2012. The exchange factor was 0.3351623.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the fund Global Fund was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Top Dividend (LD share class) effective August 30, 2012. The exchange factor was 0.5672409.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the fund DWS Brazil was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Brazilian Equities (LC share class) effective October 23, 2012. The exchange factor was 1.4148011.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the fund DWS Lateinamerika was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Latin American Equities (LC share class) effective October 26, 2012. The exchange factor was 3.2446552.

  • 10

    Liquidations of sub-funds

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest Income Strategy Dynamic was liquidated effective March 29, 2012. The issue of new sub-fund shares was discontinued effective March 9, 2012. Investors could return sub-fund shares until March 22, 2012.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest Diversified Fixed Income Strategy was liquidated effective October 31, 2012. The issue of new sub-fund shares was discontinued effective October 24, 2012. Investors could return sub-fund shares until October 24, 2012.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest Real Assets was liquidated effective October 31, 2012. The issue of new sub-fund shares was discontinued effective October 22, 2012. Investors could return sub-fund shares until October 22, 2012.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest RREEF Asia-Pacific Real Estate Securities was liquidated effective December 17, 2012. The issue of new sub-fund shares was discontinued effective December 10, 2012. Investors could return sub-fund shares until December 10, 2012.

    Mergers of sub-funds within the SICAV

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest Japanese Equities was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Top 50 Asia effective July 18, 2012.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest US-Gov Bonds was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Government Liquidity Fund effective July 23, 2012.

    Following a resolution to that effect adopted by the Board of Directors of the SICAV and the approval of the Luxembourg supervisory authority CSSF, the sub-fund DWS Invest Global Inflation Strategy was incorporated into the sub-fund DWS Invest Global Inflation Linked Bonds effective November 13, 2012.

  • 2012Annual report

  • 12

    DWS Concept ets(until March 31, 2012: DWS Invest Multi Asset Momentum)

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The objective of the investment policy of

    DWS Concept ets (until March 31, 2012:

    DWS Invest Multi Asset Momentum) is

    to achieve sustained capital apprecia-

    tion. The sub-fund invests in accordance

    with the ETS QuAM methodology,

    which pursues the objective of active

    risk limitation when markets are bearish

    and capitalization of the assets when

    markets are bullish. The goal is thus to

    achieve a positive long-term investment

    performance, bearing in mind the

    opportunities and risks in the interna-

    tional equity and bond markets.

    In 2012, the investment climate was

    characterized by the sovereign debt

    crisis, particularly in the euro periphery,

    weakening global economic growth and

    all-time low interest rates in the core

    markets such as Germany. Against this

    difficult backdrop, the sub-fund achieved

    an appreciation of 5.1% per share (LC

    share class, in euro terms; BVI method)

    in the fiscal year from January 1, 2012,

    through December 31, 2012.

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    ETS QuAM methodology is a Global

    Tactical Asset Allocation (GTAA) with

    the target of controlling the risk of the

    portfolio. The concept is based on a

    quant driven Multimanager product

    based on funds. The investment

    process is objective and relies on the

    systematic screening of a global and

    diversified pool of investment funds

    (with a focus on funds of the DWS

    Group, Blackrock and Schroders as of

    Performance of share classes (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0507267119 5.1% 6.3%

    Class LD LU0507267465 5.1% 5.0%

    Class NC LU0507267382 4.5% 5.0%

    1) Classes LC and NC on August 2, 2010/Class LD on September 20, 2010

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS CONCEPT ETSPerformance since inception

    107106105104103102101100

    DWS Concept ets (LC share class) * Launched on August 2, 2010 = 100Data on euro basis

    8/2/10*

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/10 12/126/11 12/11 6/12

  • 13

    the reporting date) to eliminate any

    human subjectivity without leverage

    or shorting. Money market, fixed

    income, balanced and equity funds are

    all considered with no restriction

    regarding the investment process. DWS

    Concept ets is an ETS QuAM product

    with a pre-set risk level defined by a

    volatility limit of 10% and invested in

    a large and diversified asset universe.

    In line with this investment policy, the

    sub-funds investments were broadly

    diversified globally. As of the reporting

    date at the end of December 2012, the

    proportion of equity funds in the

    portfolio had increased to around 49%

    of the sub-funds net assets after

    standing at 4.9% at the end of 2011.

    This was the result of the continued

    stabilization of the stock market

    climate in the second half of the year.

    While at 38.0% the share of the

    sub-funds assets allocated to bond

    funds was virtually unchanged from the

    previous year (37.1%), the share of the

    sub-funds assets allocated to money

    market funds was 9.2% at the end of

    2012 (end of 2011: 52.5% of the

    sub-funds assets). Based on this asset

    allocation, the sub-fund, viewed across

    the entire fiscal year, was able to

    noticeably limit price fluctuations and

    avoid burdens on the net asset value

    per share.

    DWS CONCEPT ETSComposition

    Investment fundsMoney market fundsCash and other assets

    9.287.7

    3.1

    0 20In % of the funds net assets in securities As of: December 31, 2012

    1006040 80

  • 14

    DWS Invest Africa

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    DWS Invest Africa, which focuses on

    the African continent, generally invests

    in companies with strong earnings, a

    good market positioning and a solid

    balance sheet. Abundance of natural

    resources, infrastructure spending and

    consumer growth play an especially big

    part in the selection of individual

    stocks. In the fiscal year through the

    end of December 2012, the sub-fund

    benefited from the continuing robust,

    global economic performance, despite

    the pressures of the sovereign debt

    crisis in the euro area and the

    U.S. fiscal cliff. In this environment, it

    achieved an appreciation of 7.6%

    (LC share class, BVI method) but was

    thus behind its benchmark, the S&P

    Africa 40 Net Index, which was up

    8.8% (both percentages in euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The underperformance against the

    benchmark was due primarily to the

    high trading costs on the African stock

    exchanges. As many of these markets

    are still underdeveloped and therefore

    relatively illiquid, pricing can be difficult.

    This is particularly evident, for example,

    in weak phases. Among other factors,

    the political changes in North Africa

    and the Middle East dampened the

    sales and earnings of African compa-

    nies. This perceptibly weakened the

    performance of the sub-fund and also

    that of the benchmark. In the first half

    of the fiscal year, the portfolio partici-

    pated in selected stocks in the

    commodities sector. This included in

    particular investments in the oil & gas

    sector, for example, in Africa Oil,

    whose share price was boosted by

    greater development potential opening

    up for the company in East Africa.

    As the fiscal year progressed, DWS

    Invest Africa profited from price gains

    by Nigerian banks, which formed an

    investment focus in the portfolio and

    were acquired at attractive valuation

    levels. The stocks benefited from the

    favorable macropolitical development

    in the country. At the end of the

    reporting period, prices of smaller

    banks contained in the sub-fund also

    recorded gains.

    In contrast, the underweight in South

    African companies, particularly in the

    banking and telecoms sectors, had a

    dampening effect on performance.

    Since some of these companies paid

    high dividends, investments here were

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0329759764 7.6% 14.9% 19.2%

    Class LD LU0363465583 7.6% 14.9% 19.6%

    Class NC LU0329759848 7.0% 12.9% 16.8%

    Class FC LU0329759921 8.6% 18.1% 25.0%

    Class A22) LU0329761075 9.8% 6.9% 2.6%

    Class DS13) LU0399357671 5.1% 4.8% 81.1%

    S&P Africa 40 Net Index (in euro) 8.8% 35.9% 37.5%

    1) Classes LC, LD, NC, FC and A2 on July 10, 2008/Class DS1 on January 20, 20092) in USD3) in GBP

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST AFRICAPerformance since inception

    14513011510085705540

    * Launched on July 10, 2008 = 100Data on euro basis

    DWS Invest Africa (LC share class)

    7/10/08*

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/1012/08 12/09 12/1212/11

  • 15

    particularly favored by more conser

    vative investors. In spite of the higher

    valuations, the shares profited to a

    degree from their defensive character

    istics, in particular the telecommunica

    tions firms with a panAfrican

    orientation.

    In the Egyptian equity market, some

    stocks like Commercial International

    Bank had a good run. However,

    DWS Invest Africa was only able to

    participate in this partially because

    the political and economic situation in

    Egypt remained unstable; this fact was

    also clear in the pronounced volatility

    (price movements).

    DWS INVEST AFRICASector allocation

    Equities: 98.1MaterialsEnergyFinancialsTelecommunication ServicesConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrialsConsumer StaplesNot classified by MSCI systemCash and other assets

    30.622.3

    3.23.1

    33.1

    3.2

    1.61.01.9

    0 10In % of the funds net assets

    20 30As of: December 31, 2012

    40

  • 16

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The sub-fund seeks to achieve

    sustained capital appreciation. On the

    basis of a portfolio that approximates

    the money market, the management

    employs various alpha strategies*

    while using derivative financial

    instruments in order to profit from the

    relative fluctuations in prices and rates

    in the bond, currency and equity

    markets. Indices/currencies and

    instruments regarded positively are

    bought (long positions), and/or issues

    regarded negatively are sold (short

    positions) at the same time. In the

    process, derivatives are primarily

    implemented in the form of long/short

    pairs, and a market-neutral portfolio

    structure is sought.

    In 2012, the performance of the capital

    markets was heavily impacted by the

    sovereign debt crisis, particularly in the

    euro periphery, weakening global

    economic growth, all-time low interest

    rates in the core markets such as

    Germany and the United States, and

    major fluctuations in the currency

    markets. Against this backdrop, DWS

    Invest Alpha Opportunities registered

    a decline of 3.2% per share (LC share

    class, in euro terms; BVI method) in

    the twelve months through the end

    of December 2012.

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    Given the uncertainty in the interna-

    tional capital markets, the sub-fund

    had a partially defensive orientation in

    some phases. It focused its invest-

    DWS Invest Alpha Opportunities (LC share class)

    DWS INVEST ALPHA OPPORTUNITIESFive-year performance

    105.0102.5100.097.595.092.590.087.5

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/07* 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/1212/11

    DWS Invest Alpha Opportunities

    2) in GBP

    Liquidation of the share class

    Share class ISIN Liquidation proceeds

    Class DS1H2) LU0399357754 92.42

    Performance of share classes (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0298689307 -3.2% -8.0% -7.4% -3.5%

    Class LD LU0363469494 -3.2% -7.9% -9.1%

    Class NC LU0298696690 -3.7% -8.9% -9.2% -5.6%

    Class FC LU0298696856 -2.7% -6.7% -5.0% -0.4%

    Class DS1H2)3) LU0399357754 -2.0% -8.6% -7.6%

    1) Classes LC, NC and FC on June 18, 2007/Class LD on July 1, 2008/Class DSH1 on March 23, 20092) in GBP3) Liquidated on December 19, 2012

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

  • 17

    ments on the currency and bond

    markets. On the bond side, in view

    of the all-time low interest rate

    environment and the uncertainties

    about interest rates, the management

    went short in the first quarter and the

    second half of 2012, for example in

    Canadian and U.S. bonds with a

    residual term of ten years. This allowed

    the sub-fund to profit from the

    temporary drop in prices in this

    investment segment. The investments

    on the bond side made an overall

    positive contribution to performance.

    However, investments on the currency

    side had a negative impact on the

    performance of DWS Invest Alpha

    Opportunities and largely explain its

    decline in value in 2012. In view of the

    initial pressure on the euro, the

    sub-fund held, for example, long

    positions in the Japanese yen, the

    Canadian and Australian dollars and in

    the U.S. dollar. However, the single

    European currency then unexpectedly

    recovered against these currencies

    towards the end of the year. This had

    a significant adverse effect on the

    investment performance.

    * Additional information about Alpha Strategies is contained in the sales prospectus.

  • 18

    DWS Invest Alpha Strategy

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The sub-fund seeks to achieve

    sustained capital appreciation. On the

    basis of a portfolio that approximates

    the money market, the management

    employs various alpha strategies*

    while using derivative financial

    instruments in order to profit from the

    relative fluctuations in prices and rates

    in the bond, currency and equity

    markets. Indices/currencies and

    instruments regarded positively are

    bought (long positions), and/or issues

    regarded negatively are sold (short

    positions) at the same time. In the

    process, derivatives are primarily

    implemented in the form of long/short

    pairs, and a market-neutral portfolio

    structure is sought.

    In 2012, the performance of the capital

    markets was heavily impacted by the

    sovereign debt crisis, particularly in

    the euro periphery, weakening global

    economic growth, all-time low interest

    rates in the core markets such as

    Germany and the United States, and

    major fluctuations in the currency

    markets. Against this backdrop, DWS

    Invest Alpha Strategy registered a

    decline of 1.6% per share in the 2012

    fiscal year (LC share class, in euro

    terms; BVI method).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    Given the uncertainty in the inter-

    national capital markets, the sub-fund

    had a partially defensive orientation in

    some phases. It focused its invest-

    Performance of share classes (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0195139711 -1.6% -1.8% 0.1% 14.3%

    Class LD LU0363469577 -1.5% -1.8% -0.3%

    Class NC LU0195140057 -2.0% -3.2% -2.1% 10.0%

    Class FC LU0195140214 -1.1% -0.7% 2.2% 18.8%

    Class A2H2)4) LU0273170067 -1.2% -7.8% -6.1% 14.5%

    Class E2H2)4) LU0273179282 -0.5% -6.2% -1.3% 21.0%

    Class DS1H3)4) LU0399357911 -0.9% -1.9% -0.2%

    1) Classes LC, NC and FC on August 30, 2004/Classes A2H and E2H on November 20, 2006/Class LD on July 1, 2008/ Class DS1H on March 23, 2009

    2) in USD3) in GBP4) Liquidated on December 19, 2012

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    1) in USD2) in GBP

    Liquidation of the share classes

    Share class ISIN Liquidation proceeds

    Class A2H1) LU0273170067 114.51

    Class E2H1) LU0273179282 121.00

    Class DS1H2) LU0399357911 99.82

    DWS INVEST ALPHA STRATEGYFive-year performance

    1051041031021011009998

    DWS Invest Alpha Strategy (LC share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    12/09 12/10 12/11 12/1212/0812/07*

  • 19

    ments on the currency and bond

    markets. On the bond side, in view of

    the all-time low interest rate environ-

    ment and the uncertainties about

    interest rates, the management went

    short in the first quarter and the second

    half of 2012, for example in Canadian

    and U.S. bonds with a residual term of

    ten years. This allowed the sub-fund to

    profit from the temporary drop in prices

    in this investment segment. The

    investments on the bond side made an

    overall positive contribution to perfor-

    mance. However, investments on the

    currency side had a significantly

    negative impact on the performance of

    DWS Invest Alpha Strategy in 2012. In

    view of the initial pressure on the euro,

    the sub-fund held, for example, long

    positions in the Japanese yen, the

    Canadian and Australian dollars and in

    the U.S. dollar. However, the single

    European currency then unexpectedly

    recovered against these currencies

    towards the end of the year. This had an

    adverse effect on the investment

    performance.

    * Additional information about Alpha Strategies is contained in the sales prospectus.

  • 20

    DWS Invest Asia Pacific ex-Japan

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    DWS Invest Asia Pacific ex-Japan

    invested primarily in equities of issuers

    having their registered offices or their

    principal business activity in the

    Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan).

    In the period from the beginning

    of January through the end of

    December 2012, the sub-fund achieved

    an appreciation of 18.9% per share

    (LC share class, BVI method). Its

    benchmark, the MSCI AC Asia ex

    Japan, recorded a gain of 19.8% in the

    same period (both percentages in euro

    terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The sub-fund lagged behind its

    benchmark primarily due to its

    underweighting of financial stocks,

    which turned in an above-average

    performance as a result of strong

    investor demand. Furthermore, the

    more heavily weighted investments

    in the cyclical consumer goods and

    industrial sectors failed to meet

    expectations. The slowdown in

    economic growth in China could be

    seen clearly here.

    Among the stocks recording a

    below-average performance in the

    reporting period were, for example,

    the Chinese textile manufacturer

    International Taifeng, whose share

    price fell against the background of a

    dividend cut. The investment in the

    airline Air Asia also underperformed as

    the announcement of the entry of a

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0544569055 18.9% 1.5%

    Class LD LU0544569139 18.9% 1.5%

    Class NC LU0544569212 18.0% 0.5%

    Class FC LU0544569303 20.0% 2.8%

    MSCI AC Asia ex Japan (in euro) 19.8% 6.4%

    1) Classes LC, LD, NC and FC on August 1, 2011

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST ASIA PACIFIC EX-JAPANPerformance since inception

    103.5100.096.593.089.586.082.579.0

    DWS Invest Asia Pacific ex-Japan (LC share class) * Launched on August 1, 2011 = 100Data on euro basis

    8/1/11* 9/11

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/11 3/12 6/12 12/129/12

  • 21

    competitor raised fears of increasing

    competitive pressure. The Chinese

    internet search engine Baidu, which is

    included in the portfolio, was also hurt

    by the emergence of a competitor.

    The IT sector, however, yielded an

    above average contribution to perfor-

    mance overall. The position in Samsung

    Electronics turned in a particularly

    strong performance due to the growth

    in the smartphone business. Also

    recording a positive performance were

    Tencent, which is included in the

    portfolio, due to its advantageous

    positioning in the market for online

    games, and the position in Super

    Group. The Singaporean manufacturer

    of consumer products had strong sales

    growth and an attractive valuation. In

    the course of the reporting period,

    profits were realized here to a certain

    extent.

    The fund management also added

    China Medical System, among others,

    to the portfolio in the reporting period.

    The pharmaceutical industry service

    provider was supported by its compara-

    tively favorable valuation and high profit

    margins.

    DWS INVEST ASIA PACIFIC EX-JAPANSector allocation

    Equities: 91.2FinancialsInformation TechnologyConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrialsEnergyTelecommunication ServicesConsumer StaplesMaterialsHealth CareUtilitiesNot classified by MSCI systemWarrantsCertificatesCash and other assets

    24.519.5

    10.25.5

    15.2

    5.04.7

    2.02.0

    1.80.8

    6.6

    1.4

    5 100In % of the funds net assets

    15 3020As of: December 31, 2012

    25

    0.8

  • 22

    DWS Invest Asian Small/Mid Cap

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The investment focus of DWS Invest

    Asian Small/Mid Cap was on equities

    of Asian companies with small and

    medium market capitalizations. In the

    fiscal year through the end of Decem-

    ber 2012, the sub-fund recorded an

    appreciation of 24.7% per share

    (LC share class, BVI method). Its

    benchmark recorded a gain of 18.8%

    in the same period (both percentages

    in euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The funds outperformance of its

    benchmark was due primarily to the

    successful selection of individual

    stocks. The shares that posted an

    above-average performance included,

    for example, the foodstuffs manufac-

    turers, Super Group (Singapore) and

    Vitasoy (Hong Kong), which recorded

    promising growth and profited from

    the rise in consumption across Asia.

    The companies furthermore benefited

    from the fact that their profit margins

    rose due to advantageous procurement

    prices for raw materials.

    Rising income levels across broad

    social strata also favored a new

    investment in the Indonesian shopping

    center operator, Pakuwon Jati. The

    leading Thai manufacturer of ceramic

    tiles, Dynasty Ceramic, was a promis-

    ing investment given its high balance

    sheet quality, attractive returns on

    capital and a shareholder-friendly

    dividend policy.

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years

    Class LC LU0236153390 24.7% 25.6% 5.2%

    Class LD LU0236153556 24.7% 25.7% 5.8%

    Class NC LU0236154448 23.8% 23.2% 1.6%

    Class FC LU0236154950 25.7% 28.4% 8.8%

    Class LS LU0254485450 24.7% 29.0% 9.3%

    Class A21) LU0273161744 26.4% 17.8% 0.0%

    Class E21) LU0273175025 29.0% 20.9% 1.4%

    MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Small Cap TR Net since April 12, 2012 (in euro) formerly: 18.8% 23.2% -5.2% FTSE Asia Pacific Smallcap ex Japan (Euro)

    1) in USD

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST ASIAN SMALL/MID CAPFive-year performance

    1241121008876645240

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    DWS Invest Asian Small/Mid Cap (LC share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/09 12/10 12/11 12/1212/0812/07*

  • 23

    On the other hand, AAC Technologies

    and Airtac were removed from the

    portfolio. The management realized

    gains on the investment in AAC

    Technologies following a strong

    increase in the share price. The

    potential for further price gains

    appeared limited for the time being for

    the producer of acoustic components.

    This was also true for the manufacturer

    of pneumatic components, Airtac, due

    to a subdued business environment.

    Xingda International, another company

    in the portfolio, also started to feel the

    effects of the deterioration in the

    general business environment.

    Increasing competitive pressure

    and weak demand for the companys

    products led to a below-average

    performance for the tire cord manu-

    facturers share price. The investment

    in Comba Telecom also recorded a

    disappointing performance. The

    telecommunications equipment

    suppliers operating environment

    deteriorated due to large cuts in capital

    spending by important customers.

    DWS INVEST ASIAN SMALL/MID CAPSector allocation

    Equities: 96.8Consumer DiscretionaryConsumer StaplesInformation TechnologyIndustrialsHealth CareMaterialsFinancialsUtilitiesCash and other assets

    27.126.4

    11.59.6

    9.25.65.5

    1.9

    0 25In % of the funds net assets As of: December 31, 2012

    105 15 35

    3.2

    20 30

  • 24

    DWS Invest Brazilian Equities

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    DWS Invest Brazilian Equities focuses

    its investments on companies which

    have their registered offices in Brazil or

    conduct their business activities

    predominantly in Brazil. In the relatively

    short reporting period from October 1,

    2012 (inception date) through the end

    of December 2012 the sub-fund

    recorded a decline of 1.8% per share

    (LC share class, BVI method) in what

    was a difficult market environment.

    Its benchmark, the MSCI Brazil 10/40

    Net TR, recorded a gain of 1.3% in the

    same period (both percentages in euro

    terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    In a move to stimulate growth, the

    Brazilian central bank cut interest rates

    to a new all-time low and introduced

    various incentives (e.g. tax relief, credit

    lines, import duties). These measures

    helped stimulate consumption but

    were so far unable to bring about

    significant growth in industrial produc-

    tion. Against the backdrop of the

    uncertain market environment and

    sector-specific issues, the sub-fund

    was underweighted in equities from

    the banking and basic materials

    sectors. However, stocks from both

    segments reported an appreciable

    price recovery in the reporting period,

    after they had considerably underper-

    formed other sectors in the first three

    quarters of the 2012 calendar year. The

    lower weighting of these equities in

    the portfolio was also a key factor in

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN Since inception1)

    Class FC LU0616857586 1.9%

    Class LC LU0616856935 -1.8%

    Class NC LU0616857313 -1.9%

    MSCI Brazil 10/40 Net TR in EUR (RI) 1.3%

    1) Classes LC and NC on October 1, 2012/Class FC on October 24, 2012

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST BRAZILIAN EQUITIESPerformance since inception

    10099989796959493

    DWS Invest Brazilian Equities (LC share class) * Launched on October 1, 2012 = 100Data on euro basis

    10/1/12*

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    10/12 11/12 12/12

  • 25

    the underperformance of the sub-fund

    compared to its benchmark. On the

    other hand, the increased holding in

    Gafisa from the real estate sector,

    whose equities were acquired at a

    noticeably reduced price, proved

    favorable. The decline of the property

    development business and higher

    levels of debt within the sector initially

    weighed on equity prices. The improve-

    ment in business prospects later in the

    period, underpinned by better-than-

    expected quarterly results, however,

    subsequently triggered an above-aver-

    age increase in the stock price. The

    holding in the drug store operator

    Brazil Pharma, which profited from the

    considerable recovery in consumer

    spending and positive growth expecta-

    tions, also made a solid contribution to

    performance. Favorable growth

    prospects also supported the decision

    to invest in the trading company

    Cia. Brasileira de Distribuicao. Never-

    theless, increasing concerns of a stock

    sale by a major investor weighed on

    performance.

    DWS INVEST BRAZILIAN EQUITIESSector allocation

    Equities: 99.4FinancialsConsumer StaplesMaterialsConsumer DiscretionaryEnergyIndustrialsInformation TechnologyHealth CareCash and other assets

    20.513.3

    7.86.6

    36.3

    1.4

    9.3

    4.2

    0.6

    0 20 30 4010In % of the funds net assets As of: December 31, 2012

    50

  • 26

    DWS Invest BRIC Plus

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The sub-fund DWS Invest BRIC Plus

    invests in Brazilian, Russian, Indian and

    Chinese equities. In the fiscal year

    through the end of December 2012,

    the sub-fund operated in a tense

    capital market climate in the wake of

    the sovereign debt crisis in Europe

    and the United States, weaker global

    economic growth and at times severe

    fluctuations in the currency markets.

    The equity markets in the emerging

    markets temporarily came under

    heavy price pressure. Nevertheless,

    the fundamental conditions for

    economic growth in the international

    context remained robust, supported

    by solid domestic demand.

    Against this backdrop, DWS Invest

    BRIC Plus achieved a gain of 4.9% per

    share (LC share class, BVI method) and

    was thus behind its benchmark, the

    MSCI BRIC, which rose by 12.2%

    (both percentages in euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The underperformance in comparison

    to the benchmark was due, among

    other things, to the recovery of

    underweighted Indian equities, which,

    particularly at the start of the year, rose

    significantly, supported by the weak-

    ness of the rupee in the currency

    markets.

    In addition, the management adopted

    an increasingly defensive approach in

    order to limit price risks. The liquidity

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0210301635 4.9% -7.5% -33.8% 79.5%

    Class LD LU0210302013 4.9% -7.5% -33.8% 79.4%

    Class NC LU0210302286 4.1% -9.4% -36.1% 69.5%

    Class FC LU0210302369 5.7% -5.4% -31.1% 91.2%

    Class A22) LU0273227784 6.8% -14.6% -38.3% 4.2%

    Class E22) LU0273227354 7.8% -11.7% -37.7% 5.5%

    Class DS13) LU0399358059 3.0% -14.7% 44.9%

    MSCI BRIC (in euro) 12.2% 7.0% -14.9% 171.3%

    1) Classes LC, LD, NC and FC on March 29, 2005/Classes A2 and E2 on November 20, 2006/ Class DS1 on January 19, 2009

    2) in USD3) in GBP

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST BRIC PLUSFive-year performance

    10091827364554637

    DWS Invest BRIC Plus (LC share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    12/08 12/09 12/10 12/1112/07* 12/12

  • 27

    position was more than 4% of the

    sub-funds net assets at times. In

    general, the management also favored

    more defensive equities with high

    earnings transparency and liquidity

    (blue chips) to the detriment of

    medium-sized equities whose

    weighting was reduced accordingly.

    In view of the uncertainties surround-

    ing the sovereign debt crisis, equities

    in the financial sector were significantly

    underweighted (in Asia); however, they

    were among the outperformers.

    To stimulate economic growth, the

    Brazilian central bank reduced key

    interest rates to a record low level

    while at the same time introducing

    additional stimulus measures (e.g.

    tax cuts, expansion of credit, import

    duties). These measures helped

    stimulate consumption but have so

    far been unable to support significant

    growth in industrial production. In light

    of the uncertain market environment,

    bank equities recorded a significant

    underperformance here, in spite of

    good longer-term growth prospects.

    Positions in the energy sector consider-

    ably underperformed expectations

    because of political uncertainties in

    Mongolia.

    DWS INVEST BRIC PLUSSector allocation

    Equities: 98.5FinancialsEnergyMaterialsConsumer StaplesInformation TechnologyIndustrialsConsumer DiscretionaryTelecommunication ServicesHealth CareUtilitiesCash and other assets

    32.617.1

    9.08.1

    5.75.6

    11.9

    6.1

    1.60.81.5

    In % of the funds net assets As of: December 31, 2012

    0 10 20 30 40

  • 28

    DWS Invest China Bonds

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The sub-fund seeks to achieve

    sustained capital appreciation. To this

    end, it invests in bonds of Chinese

    issuers denominated in renminbi or

    hedged against this currency or in

    renminbi-denominated interest-bearing

    instruments of global issuers.

    In the reporting period, the investment

    climate was characterized by the

    sovereign debt crisis in the Western

    industrial countries, weakening global

    economic growth and all-time low

    interest rates in the core markets such

    as Germany and the United States.

    Against this backdrop, DWS Invest

    China Bonds achieved an appreciation

    of 7.6% per share in the 2012 fiscal

    year (A2 share class, in U.S. dollar

    terms; BVI method).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    87% of the sub-funds assets were

    invested in interest-bearing instru-

    ments at the end of December 2012.

    The management focused its invest-

    ments on investment-grade corporate

    bonds. On the reporting date most of

    these securities had a credit rating of

    BBB and better by the leading rating

    agencies. High-yield bonds were

    included selectively in the portfolio.

    A smaller position in government

    issues rounded out the portfolio.

    In terms of sector allocation, the

    sub-fund remained broadly diversified.

    Regionally, the focus was on Chinese

    issues, which made up approximately

    Performance of share classes (in USD)

    Share class ISIN 1 year Since inception1)

    Class LCH2) LU0632805262 7.1% 6.0%

    Class LDH2) LU0740830996 6.1%

    Class NCH2) LU0740831614 5.8%

    Class FCH2) LU0632808951 7.7% 6.8%

    Class A2 LU0616856422 7.6% 6.5%

    Class E2 LU0616856778 8.1% 7.3%

    Class CH2H3) LU0813327896 0.2%

    Class CH4H3) LU0813328357 0.3%

    1) Classes A2, E2, FCH and LCH on August 16, 2011/Classes LDH and NCH on April 2, 2012/ Classes CH2H and CH4H on December 10, 2012

    2) in euro3) in CHF

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST CHINA BONDSPerformance since inception

    107.5106.0104.5103.0101.5100.098.597.0

    DWS Invest China Bonds (A2 share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/11 3/12 12/129/118/16/11* 6/12

    * Launched on August 16, 2011 = 100Data on USD basis

    9/12

  • 29

    DWS INVEST CHINA BONDSRating distribution of the bonds in the portfolio*

    AAAAAABBBBBB

    1.16.9

    27.249.5

    9.06.3

    0 10 30In % of the funds net assets in bonds(incl. pro-rata accrued interest)

    20 40* Average values based primarily on ratings

    by Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch

    50 60

    Credit quality is adequate, with higher business andfinancial risk. Interest and principal payments aregenerally made without adverse effect on creditquality. The non-investment-grade rating is consistentwith the companys business model.The rating is not consistent with the companys long-term business model. The capacity to pay interest andrepay principal is potentially reduced in the long term.

    As of: December 31, 2012

    BBtoB

    CCCandlower

    Extremely strong capacity to pay interest and repay principalVery strong capacity to pay interest and repay principalStrong capacity to pay interest and repay principalAdequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Adverseeconomic or sector-specific conditions are more likely to leadto a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal.

    AAAAAABBB

    66% of the sub-funds assets. In

    addition, DWS Invest China Bonds

    invested in other emerging markets

    such as Korea, as well as in Western

    industrial countries such as the United

    States, France, Japan and Germany.

    The management regarded Chinas

    disappointing economic growth and

    the European debt problems as the

    major risks. However, a noticeable

    economic recovery commenced in

    China in the second half of 2012. This

    fact, combined with an emerging

    stabilization of the sovereign debt crisis

    in the euro periphery, provided a

    tailwind for the credit markets. DWS

    Invest China Bonds also profited from

    its investments in corporate bonds,

    which recorded considerable price

    increases year on year accompanied

    by falling yield spreads over govern-

    ment bonds. At the end of the

    reporting period, the sub-fund held

    a cash position of 12.0%. It was thus

    favorably positioned to take advantage

    of investment opportunities arising in

    the future. As of the end of December

    2012, the sub-funds investments had

    an average yield of 3.7% p.a.* with an

    average term to maturity of 3.0 years.

    * Average yield of the sub-funds investments as of the reporting date. This may differ from the nominal yield of the interest-bearing instruments held in the portfolio. The future performance of the sub-fund cannot be derived from this.

  • 30

    DWS Invest Chinese Equities

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    In the fiscal year through the end

    of December 2012, the sub-fund

    operated in a tough climate dominated

    by the sovereign debt crisis in Europe

    and the United States, weaker global

    economic growth and at times severe

    fluctuations in the currency markets.

    The equity markets of the emerging-

    market countries found themselves

    under severe price pressure at times.

    Although the fundamental conditions

    for economic growth in an international

    context remained robust, supported

    by solid domestic demand.

    Against this backdrop, DWS Invest

    Chinese Equities achieved an appre-

    ciation of 13.3% per share (LC share

    class, BVI method) and was thus

    behind its benchmark, the MSCI China

    10/40, which gained 20.7% (both

    percentages in euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The underperformance of the portfolio in

    2012 was mainly due to the stock

    selection in the IT sector (e.g. ePro,

    Netease, and the underweighting in

    Tencent). Furthermore, the defensive

    positioning curbed the sub-fund

    development, while markets rallied on

    speculation of potential economic

    recovery driven by easing of macro

    tightening policies by the Chinese

    government, reflected in the negative

    contribution from cash. The average

    cash level was 4% with a negative

    contribution to the performance. As the

    equity market was volatile during most

    months of the last fiscal year, market

    timing had become very difficult.

    The managements cautious view on

    corporate earnings (with zero EPS

    growth expected for MSCI China in

    2012) was the main reason that the

    sub-fund did not add those poor-quality

    recovery stocks aggressively, such as

    shipping or steel stocks, during the

    market rebound, e.g., shipping and

    steel stocks.

    The management reduced weightings

    in consumer discretionary due to poor

    outlook for retail sales, and reduced

    energy due to weak coal/oil prices,

    while adding to financials and industri-

    als for more recovery in the second

    half of the year.

    The portfolio was mainly overweighted

    in sectors with good earnings visibility

    and with less impact from macro

    policy, such as healthcare and IT. Due

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0273157635 13.3% 0.4% -11.4% 49.3%

    Class NC LU0273145622 12.5% -1.8% -14.5% 43.0%

    Class FC LU0273146190 14.2% 2.6% -7.8% 56.9%

    Class FD2) LU0616869755 13.6% 9.3%

    Class A23) LU0273164177 15.9% -6.8% -18.5% 53.3%

    Class E23) LU0273176932 16.5% -5.0% -16.0% 59.4%

    Class DS14) LU0333022746 12.2% -7.7% -1.4% -0.5%

    MSCI China 10/40 (in euro) 20.7% 16.4% -2.8% 56.1%

    1) Classes LC, NC, FC, A2 and E2 on December 15, 2006/Class DS1 on December 21, 2007/Class FD on August 16, 20112) Last share price calculation on December 21, 2012/liquidated on January 31, 2013 3) in USD4) in GBP

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST CHINESE EQUITIESFive-year performance

    108100928476686052

    DWS Invest Chinese Equities (LC share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/09 12/10 12/11 12/1212/0812/07*

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

  • 31

    to concerns on slowing economic

    growth, the management under-

    weighted equities in the consumer

    discretionary and energy sectors. In

    order to avoid policy risk on property

    stocks, together with concerns on

    asset quality of banks, the manage-

    ment underweighted financials. The

    underweight in consumer discretionary

    (due to slower demand), staples

    (due to rich valuation), and industrials

    (due to slower demand) contributed

    positively. The sub-funds underweight

    in Financials contributed negatively, as

    financials rebounded strongly in 2H on

    expectation of more policy easing and

    economic recovery.

    China Overseas Grand Oceans Group,

    a niche property developer focusing on

    3rd/4th tier cities with fast growth,

    performed above-average leveraged on

    its strong brand name and good

    reputation. The management sold

    property stocks such as Longfor at a

    profit after the rebound of property

    sector. Additionally, the sub-fund

    reduced coal stocks such as Shenhua

    at a small profit on concerns of weaker

    coal prices.

    Furthermore, the management added

    Biostime, a milk powder provider

    benefiting from strong demand for

    quality infant milk power products in

    China. China Machinery Engineering, a

    contractor for international engineering

    projects, was bought at IPO given its

    strong earnings growth expectations.

    Both stocks showed significant gains.

    The equities in the portfolio which

    depreciated sharply included ePro,

    added to the portfolio on the back of

    positive expectations over the growth

    of E-commerce. However, the stock

    got hit despite its strong earnings

    growth because investors avoided

    growth stocks during the correction

    in the equity markets.

    DWS INVEST CHINESE EQUITIESSector allocation

    Equities: 93.0FinancialsEnergyTelecommunication ServicesInformation TechnologyConsumer StaplesMaterialsIndustrialsUtilitiesHealth CareConsumer DiscretionaryNot classified by MSCI systemInvestment fundsCash and other assets

    38.416.0

    7.55.4

    4.22.9

    10.7

    4.3

    1.00.9

    1.74.3

    As of: December 31, 2012

    0 30In % of the funds net assets

    10 50

    2.7

    20 40

  • 32

    DWS Invest Clean Tech

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    DWS Invest Clean Tech is primarily

    involved with companies whose

    products and services contribute to the

    cleaner production of energy, facilitate

    more efficient energy transmission and

    help to reduce energy consumption in

    general. In the reporting period from

    the beginning of January through the

    end of December 2012, the sub-fund

    appreciated 1.5% per share (LC share

    class, BVI method). Its benchmark,

    the WilderHill New Energy Global

    Innovation, declined by 5.7% in the

    same period (both percentages in

    euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    In the 2012 fiscal year, the proportion

    of North American securities was

    increased considerably at the expense

    of European stocks, as the fund

    management saw the European debt

    crisis as a major risk. An increase in

    risk aversion among investors went

    hand in hand with a deterioration of

    the situation in the European peripheral

    countries. Against this backdrop, the

    management disposed of Spanish

    companies from the renewable energy

    segment such as Gamesa and Acciona,

    whose performance was additionally

    dampened by their higher dependency

    on subsidies and the excess capacity

    within the regenerative energy sector.

    The underweighting of equities from

    the solar and wind sectors also made

    a major contribution to the funds

    outperformance of its benchmark, in

    light of the structural problems in the

    sector. A positive performance,

    however, came from Andritz, a

    manufacturer of hydro-electric power

    plant turbines. The Austrian company

    enjoyed good business and equity

    price performance, due to strong

    demand for its products.

    In the reporting period, the proportion

    of equities from the natural gas

    segment rose considerably, because

    the energy source increased in

    importance as an environmentally-

    friendly and low-priced alternative to

    other fossil fuels. The fund participated

    in this performance with its invest-

    ments in gas producers such as

    Petronas Gas and EQT and stocks from

    the gas infrastructure segment. The

    latter included Flowserve, newly

    included in the portfolio, which profited

    from an improvement in the profit

    margin and the implementation of

    restructuring measures.

    In the case of MYR Group, whose

    activities focused on the field of

    operating and expanding power

    networks and which benefited from

    higher investments in energy infra-

    Performance of share classes vs. benchmark (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years Since inception1)

    Class LC LU0298649426 1.5% -23.5% -52.9% -52.7%

    Class NC LU0298650788 0.7% -25.2% -54.6% -54.7%

    Class FC LU0298651596 2.4% -21.5% -50.8% -50.3%

    Class A22) LU0298696344 3.2% -29.2% -58.2% -54.5%

    Class DS13) LU0329762479 -0.6% -30.1% -48.1% -47.7%

    Class K22) LU0329762719 3.4% -29.3% -54.0%

    WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation (in euro) -5.7% (introduced on December 21, 2010)

    1) Classes LC, NC, FC and A2 on May 14, 2007/Class DS1 on December 21, 2007/Class K2 on April 30, 20082) in USD3) in GBP

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS Invest Clean Tech (LC share class)

    DWS INVEST CLEAN TECHFive-year performance

    10092847668605244

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    12/07*

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    12/0912/08 12/10 12/11 12/12

  • 33

    structure, the management took profits

    following good performance. The same

    applied to the battery producer Enersys

    and the U.S. manufacturer of electric

    cars Tesla Motors, which benefited

    from strong demand for its car models.

    The electrical mobility segment,

    however, recorded an uneven perfor-

    mance overall. The holding in Cum-

    mins, a producer of energy-efficient

    motors for use in trucks and construc-

    tion machinery, fell short of expecta-

    tions due to poor exports to China.

    Furthermore, the supplier of batteries

    for use in electrical vehicles A123

    recorded disappointing performance as

    a result of financial problems; the fund

    management, however, removed the

    companys equities from the portfolio

    early on.

    DWS INVEST CLEAN TECHSector allocation

    Equities: 97.5Industrial MachinerySemiconductorsIndustrial ConglomeratesGas UtilitiesIndependent Electricity ProducersHeavy Electrical EquipmentAutomobile ManufacturersDiversified ChemicalsAerospace & DefenseOil/Gas Storage and TransportIT Consulting & Other ServicesOther sectorsCash and other assets

    13.410.0

    5.85.6

    7.9

    5.54.3

    3.83.3

    3.33.1

    31.52.5

    100In % of the funds net assets

    20As of: December 31, 2012

    4030

  • 34

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus seeks

    to maximize long-term capital appre-

    ciation by taking advantage of oppor-

    tunities in the commodities markets.

    The sub-fund carried out its investment

    objective through investments in

    swaps, forwards, and commodity-

    related equities. The necessary liquidity

    for the use of derivatives was provided

    via a core portfolio of short-term fixed

    income securities with investment

    grade credit ratings. DWS Invest

    Commodity Plus recorded a return

    of -0.5% per share (LC share class,

    in euro terms; BVI method) in the

    fiscal year through the end of

    December 2012.

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    Precious Metals and Agriculture were

    among the best performing commodity

    sectors. The best performing commodi-

    ties were Gasoline, Soybeans and

    Corn. Coffee and Natural Gas were

    among the worst performing commodi-

    ties. The worst performing commodity

    sectors were Energy and Livestock.

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus remained

    almost fully invested in commodities in

    the 2012 fiscal year. The sub-fund

    benefited from a stronger weighted

    position in the precious metals sector.

    Specifically, platinum, gold and

    palladium all contributed to perfor-

    mance during the reporting period.

    Platinum prices swung wildly during

    the year as labor markets in South

    Performance of share classes (in euro)

    Share class ISIN 1 year 3 years 5 years

    Class LC LU0210303920 -0.5% -0.3% -19.3%

    Class NC LU0210304068 -1.0% -1.8% -21.4%

    Class FC LU0210304142 0.0% 1.4% -16.8%

    Class A21) LU0273166545 1.4% -7.7% -27.3%

    Class E21) LU0273178987 2.0% -5.5% -20.7%

    1) in USD

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results. As of: December 31, 2012

    DWS INVEST COMMODITY PLUSFive-year performance

    122.5115.0107.5100.092.585.077.570.0

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus (LC share class)

    BVI method performance, i.e., excluding the initial sales charge. Past performance is no guide to future results.As of: December 31, 2012

    * 12/2007 = 100Data on euro basis

    12/08 12/98 12/10 12/1112/07* 12/12

  • 35

    Africa disrupted production of the

    white metal.

    The sub-funds position in agricultural

    commodities swung from a lower

    weighting at the start of the fiscal

    year to a stronger weighting by

    mid-year and finally back to a moder-

    ately lower weighted position by year

    end. Although this positioning would

    prove to be correct, the performance

    of agricultural commodities was

    dampened somewhat by the timing

    of the positioning. Within the agricul-

    ture sector, the sub-funds position in

    3-month forward wheat detracted

    from relative performance.

    DWS Invest Commodity Plus also

    maintained a position in a commodity

    currency strategy. The strategy

    included Australian dollar, Canadian

    dollar, Norwegian krone, Russian

    rouble, and South African rand. The

    commodity currency strategy per-

    formed well during the 2012 fiscal year.

    The best performing currency during

    the period was Norwegian krone, while

    the worst performing currency was

    South African rand. Norwegian krone

    was viewed as an energy currency.

    South African rand was viewed as an

    industrial and precious metals currency

    and suffered from the consequences of

    the labor market unrest in the region.

    DWS INVEST COMMODITY PLUSSector allocation

    EnergyAgricultural Raw MaterialsIndustrial MetalsPrecious MetalsLivestock

    25.332.2

    20.7

    16.8

    5.0

    0 10In % of the funds net assets in securities As of: December 31, 2012

    403020

  • 36

    DWS Invest Convertibles

    Investment objective and

    performance in the reporting period

    The sub-fund DWS Invest Convertibles

    seeks to achieve sustained capital

    appreciation and invests globally mainly

    in convertible bonds. Its portfolio posi-

    tions are systematically hedged against

    currency risks. With this portfolio orien-

    tation, it aims at a long-term participa-

    tion in the performance of the capital

    markets with a limited downward risk

    exposure. Against the backdrop of the

    positive performance in the interna-

    tional equity markets and the easing

    of tensions in the bond markets, the

    sub-fund posted an appreciation of

    8.3% per share (LC share class,

    BVI method) in the fiscal year through

    December 31, 2012. Its benchmark,

    the ML Global 300 Convertible (hedged

    in euro), gained 12.8% (both percent-

    ages in euro terms).

    Investment policy

    in the reporting period

    The management regarded the sover-

    eign debt crisis in the euro periphery

    countries and the United States along-

    side weaker global economic growth

    as a major risk. For this reason, and

    because of a lack of liquidity, regional

    convertible bonds from the euro periph-

    ery markets like Italy and Spain were

    not given consideration in the sub-fund

    in order to limit price risks. In regional

    terms, at the beginning of the year

    Europe was underweighted because

    of the escalating sovereign debt crisis

    and Asia and the United States were

    overweighted. With the announce-

    ment by the European Central Bank

    (ECB) in summer 2012 that it would

    buy unlimited bonds of financially