DURABILITY of CONCRETE STRUCTURES PART...
Transcript of DURABILITY of CONCRETE STRUCTURES PART...
DURABILITY of CONCRETE STRUCTURES
PART 5
Prof. Dr. Halit YAZICI
1
REPAIR
REHABILITATION &
MAINTENANCE
2
Causes of Damage
EARTHQUAKES
design and application faults
Potential danger !
3
Causes of Damage
DURABILITY
PROBLEMS
Corrosion
Sulfate Attack
Carbonation
Freeze-Thaw
ASR
Hazardous
chemicals, etc.
4
CORRECT DIAGNOSIS
PROPER REHABILATION DECISION
(Strengthening, renewal, repair)
5
INSPECTION AND DETERMINING DEGREE OF DAMAGE
Site inspections Detailed survey, determining the reasons of deteriorations & environmental aggressivitiy Tests on concrete and reinforcement Project control with new material properties
CHOOSING OF PROPER MATERIALS & METHOD FOR REPAIR
CLEANING OF DETERIORATED PARTS OF CONCRETE
CLEANING AND COATING (IF NECESSARY) OF REINFORCEMENT OR PLACEMENT OF NEW REINFORCEMENT
COVERING OF REPAIRED PARTS WITH SPECIAL MORTARS
INSULATION OF FINISHED SURFACES
DEMOLITION and RECONSTRUCTIO
N
CONSTRUCTIONAL INTEGRITY CAN BE REGAINED, SERVICE LIFE CAN BE EXTENDED
SOUND
APPRAISALS, MAJOR REPAIRS, STRENGTHENING,
UPGRADING
MINOR REPAIRS &
MAINTENANCE
DECISION
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
6
DETECTION OF CRACKS
BY WETTING OF SURFACE
CHECKING THE SURFACE
CONDITION BY ADHESIVE BANDS
(DUST, LOOSE PARTICLES, ETC.)
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
7
INSPECTION of CONCRETE
1) TAKING CORES (FROM DAMAGED & UNDAMAGED REGIONS)
2) EXAMINATION of AVALIABLE DATA RELATED with THE
CONCRETE
•Concrete Structure (Design, dimensions, loading background)
•Specifications
•Concrete design
•Previous test results on materials used in production
•Quality control of fresh concrete
•The method and frequency of taking specimens
•Test results of specimens cured in the laboratory
•Test results of specimens cured in situ
•The strength of concrete in the actual structure
•Information on curing conditions & curing time
•The age of the concrete when the damage had occurred
8
DESTRUCTIVE TEST (CORE)
TROUBLESOME , EXPENSIVE, SIZE and AGE EFFECT
RELIABLE RESULTS
NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTS (REBOUND HAMMER, ULTRASOUND)
APPLICATION ALONE IS NOT ADVISABLE, CORRELATION
WITH CORES IS NECESSARY, ERROR RATIO is HIGH
(ESPECIALLY FOR OLD BUILDINGS)
* THE NUMBER of TEST DATA must be SUFFICIENT for REPRESENTATION
* STATISTICAL METHODS MUST BE USED in EVALUATION
CONCRETE STRENGTH
9
CORE
FACTORS EFFECTING THE TEST RESULTS
•SLENDERNESS RATIO of SPECIMEN
•EMBEDDED STEEL
•DRILLING DIRECTION of CORE
•RATE of APPLICATION of LOAD
•DRILLING LOCATION of CORE
•AGE of THE CONCRETE
•HUMIDITY of CORE
•etc.
•THE CALIBRATION & SENSITIVITY of TESTING MACHINE 10
CONCRETE REBOUND HAMMERS
For
CONCRETE
(Narrow
elements)
For LOW
STRENGTH
MATERIALS
(Plaster, etc.)
FOR MASS
CONCRETE 11
FACTORS EFFECTING THE TEST RESULTS
•SURFACE CONDITION of CONCRETE
•LOCAL VARIATIONS
•HUMIDITY CONTENT at the SURFACE
•CARBONATION at the SURFACE
•APPLICATION POSITION (DEGREE) of HAMMER
•CALIBRATION of HAMMER
•AGE of CONCRETE
•etc.
•EXISTANCE of STEEL REINFORCEMENT
•SURFACE HARDENERS
CONCRETE REBOUND HAMMER
12
CARBONATION
ACID + ALKALI SALT + WATER
Ca(OH)2
CO2
Ca(OH)2+CO2 CaCO3+H2O
pH12.6 pH8.3
IF pH<9.5-11.5
Initiation of Corrosion
(In Presence of O2 & H2O)
tKC C : CARBONATION DEPTH (mm)
K : COEFFICIENT of CARBONATION (mm/year0.5)
t : TIME (year)
LOW STRENGTH
CONCRETE W/C>0.6 K >3-4 mm/year0.5
15 mm OF CARBONATION DEPTH CAN BE REACHED IN 15 YEARS!
13
SCHMIDT HAMMER TEST ON CARBONATED
SURFACES
CARBONATED
CONCRETE SURFACE HARDENING
BIG ERRORS ON OLD STRUCTURES !!! EXAMPLE:
TEST RESULTS OF TWO BUILDINGS
(a. 25 YEARS OLD b. 50 DAYS OLD)
HAMMER RESULTS : fck = 16.9 MPa !
CORE RESULTS : fck = 4.8 MPa AGE OF CONCRETE 25 YEARS
HAMMER RESULTS : fck = 25.1 MPa !
CORE RESULTS : fck = 18.0 MPa AGE OF CONCRETE 50 DAYS
14
STEEL REINFORCEMENT
VISUAL
INSPECTION
NON-
DESTRUCTIVE
TESTS (Electrical
measurements,
metal detectors -
pundit)
•Location
•Number
•Distance
•Diameter
•Corrosion
condition
of the
reinforcement
DESTRUCTIVE
TESTS
LABORATORY
TESTS
Sampling
Tensile Test
Chemical Analysis
Other Tests
(energy
absorption
capacity,
Workability vb.)
Stress-Strain
Relationship
•Corrosion
•Rust Stains
•Cover Cracks
•Pop-out
Removal of
concrete cover
•Location
•Number
•Distance
•Diameter
•Corrosion
condition
of the
reinforcement 15
TENSILE TEST
16
CuSO4 crytals
Copper
(Cu)
Saturated copper
sulfate solution
(CuSO4)
Permeable
end
Wet Sponge
Millivoltmeter Corrosion
measuring
system –
(electrical)
17
STRUCTURAL INSPECTION
Architectural Survey
The Survey of Load Carrying System (Determination of dimensions &
locations of Column-Shell-Beam-Curtains)
Determination of Location, diameter and number of Reinforcement
Determination of width and direction of cracks
Determination of other damage types if exists (Buckling, X cracks on
walls, Settlement etc.)
Noting of application faults
Determination of elements that are heavily damaged, that threats the
structural safety in order to take urgent measures
etc.
INSPECTION OF PROJECTS & SPECIFICATIONS
THE CALCULATION of LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF
STRUCTURE BY MEANS of DATA EVALUATED
COMPARISON of RESULTS WITH PROJECTS & AVALIABLE SPECIFICATIONS 18
FACTORS ON DECISION MAKING
•ECONOMICAL (Feasibility Study) –
Cost of Repair 0.5 Cost of Reconstruction ?
•Technological possibilities
•Service life
•Historical & Artistic worth
•Commercial aspect
•Political aspect
•The effect of Strengthening on building functions
•The applicability and Reliability of Repair-
Strengthening methods
•Demolition, Reconstruction opportunities
19
EVALUATION OF OBTAINED
DATA
STATISTICAL METHODS
INCLUDING PROBABILITY &
RISK CONCEPTS SHOULD
BE USED
BEING CONTENTED WITH THE AVERAGE
of INSUFFICIENT NUMBER of TEST DATA
REAL SITUATION OF STRUCTURE CAN NOT BE
REPRESENTED
BIG MISTAKES 20
SOUND
•There is no
necessity
MINOR
REPAIRING IS
NEEDED
•Simple Repairs
•Measures that
should prevent
repetation of
damage etc.
LOAD BEARING
CAPACITY SUFFICIENT
LOAD BEARING CAPACITY
UNSUFFICIENT
STRENGTHENING
IS NEEDED
REPAIR
STRENTENING IS
NEEDED
DECISION
OTHER FACTORS EFFECTING DECISION
STRENGTHENING
PROJECT 21
INCORRECT STRENGTHENING PROJECT AND APPLICATION
WEAKENING AND FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE
22
PREPARATION BEFORE REPAIR
THE CONCRETE THAT WILL BE REPAIRED
HAVE TO CONTAIN CERTAIN PROPERTIES
SURFACE MUST BE SOUND & DURABLE,
SHOULD NOT CONTAIN
* LOOSE OR DECOMPOSED PARTICALS,
* FAULTS & CRACKS (HONEY COMBED REGIONS)
* DUST, DIRT, OIL, PAINT, CURING MATERIALS THAT
WEAKENS THE ADHERENCE BETWEEN THE OLD & NEW
CONCRETE
* DETRIMENTAL MATTERS THAT CAUSE CORROSION
TO REACH THE SOUND CONCRETE LAYERS
DETORIATED CONCRETE LAYER SHOULD BE
REMOVED & SURFACE PREPATION OPERATIONS
SHOULD BE PERFORMED 23
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
IMPACT HAMMERS
FREQUENTLY USED
METHOD
RISK OF FORMATION
of MICROCRACKS on
SOUND CONCRETE
THE TYPE of CRUSHER is
IMPORTANT EXTRA OPERATIONS might be
NECESSARY IN CASE of DAMAGE
in SOUND LAYERS 24
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
REGIONS
CUTTING by SAWS
CUTTING DEPTH CAN BE
ADJUSTED
CUTTING PROCEDURE
SHOULD NOT PENETRATE
TO SOUND LAYER
SAWS THAT MAY CUT & STRIP THE
CONCRETE COVER (ALSO OPERABLE
ON VERTICAL SURFACES) 25
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
SAND BLASTING
LOOSE PARTICLES and DIRTY
MATERIAL MAY BE CLEANED
FROM SURFACE
REMOVAL of THICK LAYERS is
NOT POSSIBLE
ECONOMICAL on LARGE
SURFACES
TOO MUCH DUST !!!
ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT
METHOD for OTHER REMOVAL
APPLICATIONS
26
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
WATER
JET
REMOVAL of LOOSE &
POLLUTED MATERIAL FROM
the SURFACE
REMOVAL of THICK LAYERS is
NOT POSSIBLE
SANDY WATER
JET
MOST ECONOMICAL METHOD
in CASE of USING CEMENT
BASED REPAIRING MORTARS
NOT ADVISABLE FOR POLYMER
BASED MORTARS DUE to WET
SURFACES
USED as ADDITIONAL CLEANING
METHOD 27
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
OTHER METHODS
BLASTING PROPER for LARGE
SCALE WORKS
APLLICATION RISKS,
SPECIALIST TEAM
NECESSARY
BURNING
CLEANING of
PAINTS, FOREIGN
MATERIALS FROM
THE SURFACE
NOT ADVISABLE FOR
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
WITH INSUFFICIENT
CONCRETE COVER
THICKNESS
28
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
OTHER METHODS
ACID
APPLICATION
APPLICATION of 5-
10% PHOSPHORIC
ACID SOLUTION MAY
LOOSEN WEAK &
DIRTY LAYER
NOT ADVISABLE
METHOD.
CLEANING is
NECESSARY after
IMPLEMENTATION
AIR
BLOWING
PRESSURE of AIR
MAY BLOW AWAY
DUST etc. FROM
SURFACE
LAST APPLIED METHOD
(i.e. AFTER SAND BLASTING)
29
REMOVAL of DAMAGED
CONCRETE
OTHER METHODS CHISEL, HAMMER,
SAND PAPER,
ELECTRICAL SURFACE
WEARING DEVICES
PROPER FOR CLEANING
of SURFACE AND
REINFORCEMENT
MORE THAN ONE METHOD SHOULD be
IMPLEMENTED
MINIMUM DAMAGE SHOULD be EXPECTED on
SOUND CONCRETE SURFACES
EXCESS HEAT & VIBRATION SHOULD NOT CAUSE PROBLEMS
on REINFORCEMENT or R.F + CONCRETE BOND 30
STRENGTHENING & IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS
VOLUME of WORKS
APPLICATION POSSIBILITIES
BONDING PROPERTIES (STEEL & CONCRETE)
ADHERENCE to OLD CONCRETE (DIMENSIONAL STABILITY)
SELECTION of MATERIALS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROPERTIES
(TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, WIND, etc.)
ECONOMICAL FACTORS
SERVICE CONDITIONS & EXPECTED SERVICE LIFE
31
STRENGTHENING & IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS
RENEWAL of CONCRETE
EPOXY or POLYESTER BASED REPAIR MORTARS
STEEL PROFILES
CEMENT BASED REPAIR MORTAR
SELF – COMPACTING CONCRETE (SCC)
SHOTCRETE - GUNITE
FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE (Steel, Polypropilen, Glass, etc.)
FIBER REINFORCED SCC
FIBER REINFORCED POLYMERS (FRP)
NON-SHRINKING MORTARS (GROUT)
CEMENT PASTE
SLURRY INFILTRATED CONCRETE (SIFCON)
REACTIVE POWDER CONCRETE (RPC) 32
RENEWAL of CONCRETE
PROPER for LARGE SCALE WORKS for STRENGTHENING PURPOSES
HONEY COMBED PARTS IN NEW CONSTRUCTIONS must be
RENEWED IMMEDIATELY
33
RENEWAL of CONCRETE
USUALLY NEW FORMS ARE NECESSARY
IF
REINFORCEMENT
IS DEFECTIVE; IT
SHOULD BE CUT
AWAY & NEW
REINFORCEMENT
SHOULD BE
PLACED with
NECESSARY
BONDING LENGTH
34
Photographs : Çelik MATER
WRAPPING
35
ADDITIONAL LOAD –BEARING ELEMENTS
ANCHORAGE OF REBARS
SURFACE PREPARATION
ADHESION OF NEW AND OLD CONCRETE
***
36
t1 t2 t
1
2
OLD
CONCRETE
NEW
CONCRETE
0
SHRINKAGE of NEW CONCRETE
– SHRINKAGE of OLD CONCRETE
--------------------------------------------------
= RELATIVE SHRINKAGE
2 -1 -------- =
if is HIGH
RISK of CRACKING !!!!
DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE PROBLEMS
37
SHRINKAGE
THERMAL EXPANSION
E
EXTRA
TENSILE
STRESS
Tensile
stresses Cracks
Before casting
sP sT <
NO CRACKS
SUFFICIENT MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
(FLEXURAL, TENSILE, COMPRESSIVE STR.)
E1, 1
E2, 2
E1 E2
1 2
constraints
constraints
38
Max 2 cm
0.5 cm
Subsurface should be clean and rough enough to provide
sufficient frictional resistance
< 3 cm mortar
> 3 cm concrete
ADHERENCE
Very low viscosity, low yield value Segregation
susceptible
Mechanical blocking
Cement paste migration due to low viscosity
Segregation resistant
Self levelling cement mortar with optimum viscosity and low yield value
high viscosity repair mortar
Low pore filling capacity due to high viscosity
Low adhesion performance due to empty
pores
39
Properties of repair materials
Classification of repair materials
Class 40 Class 25 Class 15
Compressive strength- 28 d. (MPa) 30-60 20-40 10-30
Min. Tensile strength- 7 d. (MPa) 2 1.5 1
Modulus of Elasticity - 28 d. (GPa) 15-25 9-15 5-9
Min. Adherence strength- 28d. (MPa) 2 1.5 1
Max. Coeff. of thermal expansion (1/oC) 8-12x10-6
Max. Drying shrinkage -28d 400x10-6
Max. Drying shrinkage -1 year 1000x10-6
Manual of structural maintenance, Hong Kong Housing
Department, 1987
Dimensional stability – Mechanical properties – Adherence
40
Flowable
sticky
sprayable
APPLICATION EASINESS
41
MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION
42
Emulsion applications
(resin, paraffin and
acrylic)
Water and
solvent based
hydrophobic
materials
43
FRP
CARBON – GLASS FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITES
VERY HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH
APPLICATION EASE
DURABILITY AGAINST CHEMICAL ATTACK (NO CORROSION RISK)
LIGHT WEIGHT MATERIAL
EASE of STORAGE (ROLLS, BANDS)
CONCRETE
EPOXY BASED BINDER
EPOXY BASED PUTTY
EPOXY BASED ADHESIVE
LAMINATE
EPOXY BASED ADHESIVE
UV RESISTANT PAINT
44
FRP LOW RESISTANCE to HIGH TEMPERATURES
DIRECTION of FIBERS is IMPORTANT
LOW UV RESISTANCE
HIGH CREEP DEFORMATIONS
LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE is NOT CLEAR
RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE MATERIAL
min. CONCRETE CLASS C16
APPLICATION DIFFICULTIES at JOINTS
45
E fy ft u
STEEL
Fe B 44K
STRAND
206000
206000
7850
7850
440
1200
550
1900
> 20
> 5
MBrace FIBRE C1-30
(High strength Carbon)
Mbrace FIBRE C5-30
(High Modulus Carbon)
MBrace FIBRE C8-30
(Very High Modulus carbon)
230000
390000
640000
1820
1820
2100
-----
-----
------
3430
3000
1900
1.5
0.8
0.3
MBraceFIBRE G-60AR
(AR Glass)
65000 2600 ----- 1700 2.8
E fy ft u
STEEL
Fe B 44K
STRAND
206000
206000
7850
7850
440
1200
550
1900
> 20
> 5
MBrace FIBRE C1-30
(High strength Carbon)
Mbrace FIBRE C5-30
(High Modulus Carbon)
MBrace FIBRE C8-30
(Very High Modulus carbon)
230000
390000
640000
1820
1820
2100
-----
-----
------
3430
3000
1900
1.5
0.8
0.3
MBraceFIBRE G-60AR
(AR Glass)
65000 2600 ----- 1700 2.8
FRP
46
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
APPLICATION OF
FIBER
REINFORCED
POLYMERS
FOR
STRENGTHENING
PURPOSES
AT COLUMN-BEAM
JOINTS & AT
GIRDERS
47
APPLICATION
OF FRP’s ON
TEST
SPECIMENS
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
48
FRP LABORATORY STUDIES
15 cm CUBES & 10/20; 15/30
cm CYLINDER SPECIMENS
WRAPPED BY ONE AND
TWO LAYERS OF FRP
RELATIVE STRENGTH IN CUBES
CONTROL(100) ONE LAYER OF
FRP (121)
TWO LAYERS OF FRP (142)
RELATIVE STRENGTH IN CYLINDERS 10/20 cm
CONTROL (100) ONE LAYER OF FRP (180)
TWO LAYERS OF FRP (242)
15/30 cm CYLINDER
CONTROL (100) ONE LAYER OF FRP (132)
49
FRP LABORATORY STUDIES
10 X 10 X 60 cm CONCRETE SPECIMEN
CONTROL SPECIMEN (100)
LAMINATED SPECIMEN (372)
REPAIRED BROKEN SPECIMEN (262)
ADHESION OF LAMINATE TO TENSILE ZONE
APPLICATION OF LAMINATE TO TENSILE ZONE
OF BROKEN BEAM THAT HAS BEEN BONDED
BY EPOXY
WRAPPING OF FRP
LAMINATED AND WRAPPED SPECIMEN (859)
BEAM BEHAVED LIKE A RFC ELEMENT
RELATIVE FLEXURAL STRENGTH
50
FRP
51
Strengthening against flexural and shear stresses 52
DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS OF FRP
53
MBrace FRP” Wet Lay Up”
MASONRY PANELS
HIGH STRENGTH CARBON AND AR GLASS FIBER 54
FRP EASE OF
APPLICATION
55
FRP EASE OF APPLICATION
56
BEAM-COLUMN JOINT ?
current research topic
(Ghobarah and Said 2002)
Alper İlki
İTÜ, 2007
57
1- SELF LEVELLING CONCRETE
(SLC) 2- SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE
(SCC) 3- SELF CONSOLIDATING CONCRETE
(SCC)
- NO VIBRATION
- NO SEGREGATION
IDEAL MATERIAL
for REPAIRING
SCC
58
SCC
59
Different
workability
tests:
V – Funnel
Test
SCC
60
SCC
L – Box
Test
61
HIGH MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
HIGH DURABILITY
MAXIMUM
COMPACTION
LOW W/C
RATIO
QUALITY of
CONCRETE
COVER
IMPERMEABILITY
HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE
SCC
62
SHORTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD
LOWER LABOR COSTS
BETTER CONCRETE QUALITY (STRENGTH & DURABILITY)
EASE OF PUMPING
SEGREGATION RESISTANCE
FLUIDITY
But RESISTANCE to SEGREGATION
Reological behavior is being changed by introduction of new
chemical admixtures
SCC
63
* EXTRA HYDRAULIC PRESSURE (STRONGER FORMS)
SCC
* CASTING PROBLEMS in SOME CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS
* DIFFERENT PHYSICAL & MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
* COST of MIX
* ABSENCE of STANDART PRODUCTION TECHNICS & TESTS
64
SCC
65
SCC
66
SCC
67
* SUITABLE FOR REPAIRING & STRENGHTENING JOBS
(Especially in cases where vibration is not possible)
SCC
68
(GUNITE, PNEOCRETE, PLASCRETE,
LETCRETE) SHOTCRETE
Aggregate
Cement
Water
Accelerator
Conveying in
pipes by
pressured air
Placing by
Blowing
WET METHOD
DRY METHOD
69
(Transportation + Placing + Compaction) simultaneously
No formwork, Less labor force
High application speed
Special team & equipmnet
Loss of material by bouncing
70
(GUNITE, PNEOCRETE, PLASCRETE,
LETCRETE) SHOTCRETE
71
RE-CONSTITUTION OF FREEZE-THAW SURFACES
BY SHOTCRETE
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
72
FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
Aggregate
Cement
Water
Admİxture
Randomly
distributed
fibers
fiber fiber
fiber
matrix Matris Matris
Crack Crack Crack
Function:
Control of crack propogation
73
(Lofgren 2005)
Different fiber types
74
CARBON FIBERS
STEEL FIBERS POLYPROPILEN FIBERS
GLASS FIBERS
TYPES of CONCRETE FIBER
75
INCREASE in
ENERGY ABSORBTION
CAPACITY
FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
76
SFRC
Plain concrete Plain concrete
Plain concrete
strain
strain
SFRC
SFRC
Com
pre
ssiv
e s
tr.
Tensile s
tr.
Load
deflection
77
Parameters that affect the mechanical performance of
fiber reinforced concrete
• Fiber type
• Fiber content
• Aspect ratio of fiber
• Tensile strength of fiber, mechanical conformity with
matrix
• Orientation of fibers
• Homogeneous dispersion of fibers in matrix phase
DECREASE IN WORKABILITY
DECREASE IN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DUE TO FORMATION OF POROUS ZONES AT FIBER OVER DOSAGES
REQUIREMENT OF BETTER CASTING PLANNING AND WORKMANSHIP
DISADVANTAGES
78
40 kg/m3 ZP305 40 kg/m3 RC80/60
60 kg/m3 RC80/60
STEEL FIBER REINFORCED SELF LEVELLING
CONCRETE
79
STEEL FIBER REINFORCED SELF LEVELLING
CONCRETE
80
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
Deplasman (mm)
Yü
k (
N)
plain
60 kg/m3 ZP305
40 kg/m3 ZP305
20 kg/m3 ZP305
plain 20 kg/m3 40 kg/m3 60 kg/m3
Flow diameter (mm) 775 755 710 640
Comp.str (MPa) 65.1 68 68.1 62.9
Flexural str. (MPa) 5.1 5.4 6.6 10
Fracture en. (N/m) 51 873 2138 3138
Mix properties
Powder content: 580 kg/m3
Water/binder: 0.32
fine/coarse agr: 1.72
Load (N
)
Deflection (mm)
Increase in energy absorbtion capacity 61.5 times !!!
81
STEEL FIBROUS SHOTCRETE
RAILROAD TUNNEL REPAIRING / UŞAK 82
SIFCON
STEEL FIBER (% 4-20 by VOLUME) HIGH REINFORCEMENT CONTENT
HIGH DEFORMATION CAPACITY,
% 10 – 15
HIGH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
120 – 140 MPa
(SLURRY INFILTRATED CONCRETE)
CEMENT
SILICA FUME
WATER
SUPERPLASTICIZER
VERY FINE AGGREGATE
83
84
SIFCON
85
REPAIRING & STRENGTHENING with SIFCON
IMPROVING SHEAR RESISTANCE (dimensions:mm)
SIFCON COVER LOAD (P/2)
a
d=
20
0
onarılmış 50 100 50
25
150
25
150 25 25 REPAIRED
PORTION
100 50 50
86
REACTIVE POWDER CONCRETE (RPC)
* SILICA FUME
* REACTIVE SiO2 (300 m)
(REPLACING FINE & COARSE AGGREGATE)
* HIGH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH : 200 – 800 MPa
* MODULUS OF ELASTICITY : 41 000 – 76 000 MPa
* WATER VAPOUR CURING UNDER ATMOSPHERIC
or HIGH PRESSURE
* STEEL MICRO FIBERS
* HIGH COMPACTION (GRADATION is VERY IMPORTANT)
87
R.F. BEAM
RPC
STRENGTHENING by RPC
REACTIVE POWDER CONCRETE (RPC)
88
BINDING MATERIALS
OLD
PRACTICES
CEMENT PASTE
CEMENT MORTARS
SUCCESFULL
APPLICATIONS
RECENT
PRACTICE
EPOXY RESINES
POLYVINYL ACETATE
STYRENE BUTADYNE
ACYRILIC
SUCCESFULL
APPLICATIONS
HIGH COMPRESSIVE, TENSILE, SHEAR STRESSES
IMPERMEABILITY
CHEMICAL DURABILITY
EXPENSIVE
TOXIC PROPERTIES
SHORT STORAGE TIME
89
EPOXY & POLYESTER BASED REPAIR MORTARS
MORE THAN
1 COMPONENT
EPOXY RESIN
PLASTICIZER
PIGMENTS
SUSPENSION COMPOUNDS
SOLVENT
SAND COMPOSITIONS
BINDER
FILLER
RAPID STRENGTH GAIN (MAX. STR. 2 hours – 2 days)
HIGH BINDING PROPERTY
EXPENSIVE MATERIAL
IMPERMEABILITY
LOW RESISTANCE to HIGH TEMPERATURES
DURABILITY AGAINST CHEMICAL ATTACK
DRY SURFACE APPLICATIONS
EXOTHERMIC REACTION (HIGH HEAT)
LONG TERM RESISTANCE ???
PETROCHEMICAL PRODUCTS
90
Mechanical and physical properties
of typical epoxy based repair mortar
Loss in mechanical properties over 80oC !!!
Basınç dayanımı, DIN 53454 110-120 MPa
Eğilme dayanımı, ASTM C580-74 30-35 MPa
Elastisite modülü, ASTM C580-74 18-20 GPa
Çeliğe aderansı, DIN ISO 4626 > 30 MPa
Betona aderansı, DIN ISO 4624 > 3 MPa
Termal genleşme katsayısı, ASTM C531-81 (20-100 °C) 2110-6
°C-1
Rötre, ASTM D 2566-79 0.0017 %
Compressive Str.
Flexural Strength
Modulus of Elasticity
Adhesion str. (steel)
Adhesion str. (concrete)
Coefficient of thermal expansion
Shrinkage ASTM D 2566-79
91
SMALL SCALE REPAIR JOBS
(FILLING BINDING)
GLASS FIBER REINFORCED
EPOXY BASED REPAIR MORTAR
92
CEMENT BASED REPAIR MORTARS
HIGH THERMAL RESISTANCE
SIMILAR PHYSICAL & MECHANICAL PROPERTIES with CONCRETE
SATURATED DRY SURFACE APPLICATIONS (?)
IMPERMEABILITY
LONGER CURING PERIOD
RELATIVELY LOW COST
PORTLAND CEMENT
MINERAL ADDITIVES
EXPANDING CEMENT (GROUT)
PLASTICIZERS
RETARDERS or ACCELARATORS
COMPONENTS
SAND
RELATIVELY SLOW STRENGTH GAIN
FIBER (POLYPROPILEN, STEEL, CARBON,
GLASS etc.)
93
LARGE SCALE
REPAIR WORKS
94
GROUT
* LARGE VOIDS can be FILLED by AGGREGATE
* FILLING of PORES & CRACKS by INJECTION
* IMPERMEABILITY PROBLEMS
* HIGH FLOWABILITY
* CHEMICAL & MINERAL ADDITIVES
* SULFO-ALUMINATE BASED COMPOUNDS
(for swelling)
* LOWEST POSSIBLE W/C RATIO FOR HIGHER STRENGTH
* PREFABRICATED COLUMN SOCKETS
SHRINKAGE is COMPENSATED
by EXPANDING COMPOUNDS
95
OPENING OF
CRACKS DRILLING OF
INJECTION HOLES
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
96
CLEANING OF
DUST & LOOSE
MATERIAL
CLEANING OF
SURFACE BY
PRESSURED WATER
OR BY SAND BLAST
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
97
FIXING OF
CUPPER
TUBES
PLASTERING
OF CRACKS
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
98
INJECTION FROM LOWEST
TUBE TO UPPER HOLES BY
PUMP
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
99
CLOSING OF
INJECTION HOLES
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
100
INJECTION PUMPING
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
101
STRENGTHENING BY STEEL
EASE OF APPLICATION BY THE USE OF EPOXY BASED BINDERS
102
. 50.10/30 lama
L100.100.10
1
L100.100.10
3 mm kaynak
18 10 1810
366 mm
300 mm
12/t=15 cm ilave
mesnet donatısı 80.10 saç
kiriş boyunca sürekli
Bulon
450 mm
2
18/t=30 cm
etriye (üstten bulonlu)
Eski kiriş
30/60
Pul
80.10 , etriye başlığı
STRENGTHENING BY STEEL
Additional support RF 12/15
Bolt
washer Cont. Steel plate over the beam
Stirrup base
beam
Welding (3mm)
Steel plate
Stirrup (bolted)
103
Typical joint failure
Wrapping by steel plates
Double Wrapping by steel plates
Typical joint failure
Wrapping by steel plates
Double Wrapping by steel plates
Str. at corner joints Str. at front joints
104
photos by Hayri ÜN
STRENGTHENING BY STEEL
105
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
106
SMALL BUSHES
SOUND SURFACES
DETERIORATED SURFACES (WHITE STAINS, SOFT, FRIABLE, CRACKED SURFACES)
WHITE SALT ACCUMULATED NATURAL SOIL
INDUSTRIAL (WASTE WATER) POOL
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
107
UNDERGROUND WATER
AGGRESSIVE
(SULFATE) SOIL
SOUND
ZONES
DETERIORATED
SURFACES
OPENING OF INSPECTION
HOLE & REMOVAL OF
AGGRESSIVE SOIL SOUND
CONCRETE
DETERIORATED
CONCRETE
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
108
SOUND
CONCRETE
REMOVAL OF
COVER
STEEL
REINFORCEMENT
COVER
REMOVED
ZONE
SOUND
CONCRETE
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
DIAMETER CONTROL, RUST
CLEANING & PAINTING
WITH ANTICORROSIVE
MATERIALS 109
PLASTERING
WITH
SPECIAL
FINISHING
MORTAR
SULFATE RESISTANT
INSULATION OVER
CONCRETE COVER
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
APPLICATION OF
REPAIRING
MORTAR
SOUND
CONCRETE
110
GRAVEL
FILLING
INCLINED SIDE WALKS
FOR RAIN (SULFATE
RESISTANT CEMENT)
CASE STUDY OF SULFATE ATTACK
DRAINAGE PIPES
(LOWERING OF
WATER LEVEL)
111
DURABILITY of CONCRETE STRUCTURES
PART 5
Prof. Dr. Halit YAZICI
112