Dumping Eco
-
Upload
gurleen-kaur -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Dumping Eco
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
1/11
In economics, "dumping" is any kind ofpredatory pricing, especially in the context
ofinternational trade. It occurs when manufacturers export a product to another country at a
price either below the price charged in its home market, or in quantities that cannot be
explained through normal market competition. Dumping can force established domestic
producers out of a market and lead to monopolistic positions by the exporting nation. Forexample, a glut of Chinese garlic exports in the mid 2000's forced many North American
producers to switch crops and leave the market. When the price of Chinese garlic soared in
2009, the shuttered North American businesses were unable to quickly re-enter the local
market due to barriers to entry. A standard technical definition of dumping is the act of
charging a lower price for a good in a foreign market than one charges for the same good in a
domestic market. This is often referred to as selling at less than "fair value". Under the World
Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement, dumping is condemned (but is not prohibited) if it
causes or threatens to cause material injury to a domestic industry in the importing country.
The term has a negative connotation as advocates offree markets see "dumping" as a form of
protectionism. Furthermore, advocates for workers and laborers believe that safeguarding
businesses against predatory practices, such as dumping, help alleviate some of the harsher
consequences of such practices between economies at different stages of development .While
there are very few examples of a national scale dumping that succeeded in producing a
national-level monopoly, there are several examples of dumping that produced a monopoly in
regional markets for certain industries.
Legal issues
If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges in its own
home market, it is said to be "dumping" the product. Opinions differ as to whether or not
such practice constitutes unfair competition, but many governments take action against
dumping to protect domestic industry. The WTO agreement does not pass judgment. Its focus
is on how governments can or cannot react to dumpingit disciplines anti-dumping actions,
and it is often called the "anti-dumping agreement. The WTO agreement allows governments
to act against dumping where there is genuine ("material") injury to the competing domestic
industry. To do so, the government has to show that dumping is taking place, calculate the
extent of dumping (how much lower the export price is compared to the exporters home
market price), and show that the dumping is causing injury or threatening to cause injury.
Definitions and extent
While permitted by the WTO, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (Article VI)
allows countries the option of taking action against dumping. The Anti-Dumping Agreement
clarifies and expands Article VI, and the two operate together. They allow countries to act in
a way that would normally break the GATT principles of binding a tariff and not
discriminating between trading partnerstypically anti-dumping action means charging extra
import duty on the particular product from the particular exporting country in order to bring
its price closer to the normal value or to remove the injury to domestic industry in the
importing country.There are many different ways of calculating whether a particular productis being dumped heavily or only lightly. The agreement narrows down the range of possible
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_pricinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriers_to_entryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_valuehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_markethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exportshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_competitionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Agreement_on_Tariffs_and_Tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Agreement_on_Tariffs_and_Tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_competitionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exportshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_markethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_valuehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriers_to_entryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_pricing -
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
2/11
options. It provides three methods to calculate a products normal value. The main one is
based on the price in the exporters domestic market. When this cannot be used, two
alternatives are availablethe price charged by the exporter in another country, or a
calculation based on the combination of the exporters production costs, other expenses and
normal profit margins. And the agreement also specifies how a fair comparison can be madebetween the export price and what would be a normal price. Calculating the extent of
dumping on a product is not enough. Anti-dumping measures can only be applied if the
dumping is hurting the industry in the importing country. Therefore, a detailed investigation
has to be conducted according to specified rules first. The investigation must evaluate all
relevant economic factors that have a bearing on the state of the industry in question. If the
investigation shows dumping is taking place and domestic industry is being hurt, the
exporting company can undertake to raise its price to an agreed level in order to avoid anti-
dumping import duty.
The Economic And Legal Analysis Of Dumping
One of the main reasons behind distortion of international trade and fair competition is that
though increasing returns in a monopolistic market promote international trade this situation
ignores many of the detrimental effects that can arise due to imperfect competition, such as a
disparity in the prices a firm charges for its goods that are exported and the ones that are sold
in their respective domestic markets, constituting price discrimination. The most common
form of price discrimination is dumping, defined as a situation where, the price of a product
when sold in the importing country is less than the price of that product in the market of the
exporting country.
The definition of dumping according to GATT2 is:
The sale of products for export at a price less than the normal value where normal value
means roughly the price for which those same products are sold on the home or exporting
market. The concept of dumping seems fair because it is recognized that producers may sell
their goods in different markets at different prices and that prices of a goods are influenced by
several market forces and may vary at different times. It may be a perfectly legitimised
business activity like discounts offered by airlines to students or senior citizens etc. There
may not seem anything intrinsically unethical or illegal about dumping. Adam Smith hasfamously quoted:
If a foreign country can supply us with commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it,
better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way
in which we have some advantage. Economists have emphasized that economic law and
policy should only be about economic efficiency. They rebuff any legal doctrine that
entrenches any economic rights at all on grounds of fairness, rather than efficiency.
According to them the whole purpose of competition is for consumer welfare. However,
dumping is regarded as an unfair trade practice as it may cause or threaten to cause material
injury to the importing markets and hence, anti-dumping measures are initiated. These
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
3/11
measures include imposition of anti-dumping duties that are imposed at the time of imports in
addition to other custom duties that are intended to off-set the supposed injury and price
undertaking, wherein the exporter himself undertakes to raise the price of the product and
then sell it in the importing country to avoid the anti-dumping duties. The credibility of these
measures has been debated upon since on one side anti-dumping measures aim at providingspeedy relief to the domestic industry against the trade-distorting phenomenon of dumping
and on the other hand, it is argued that countries take advantage of anti-dumping laws
because of their economic and political manipulability and prove to be a threat to the free
market access that the GATT/WTO have strived to achieve in the past 50 years. According to
them, international price discrimination is objectionable. If left uncontested and
unchallenged, it confers a comparative advantage on exporters. Exporters exploit the market,
with considerable negative effects on domestic industry. The use of anti-dumping actions
therefore enables the domestic producers to offset, quantitatively the artificial advantages
received by the exporting countrys producers so that they are able to compete on an equal
footing with the exporting countrys producers. Anti-dumping measures largely provide this
level playing field.Dumping has two differing effects in the importing country. The low
prices of the imported products may harm the domestic industry which is producing like
products. At the same time, consumers and other industrial users of the importing country
may benefit from such low prices. However, these users and consumers are not well
organized and their voice is not as strong as the producer industries which are normally
backed by trade unions. Hence, pressure for acting against dumping is usually much stronger
than that of dumping.
IN DEFENSE OF DUMPING: ANTI-DUMPING FLAWSThe rhetoric of anti-dumping is that it disciplines unfair trade practices. The agreement
specifies that price discrimination is an unfair trade practice if it causes injury to domestic
industry.However, economists argue that without showing predatory intent, price
discrimination cannot be held to be an unfair trade practise. Since there is no such pre-
requisite of anti-dumping use, it itself is an unfair trade practise that blocks fair competition.
Benefits of dumping:
On the exporting country
1. It finds market for its surplus production
2. By exporting more, it is able to strengthen its balance of payments position
3. Consumers in the importing country benefit as they have to pay lower prices for whatever
they purchase of the commodity dumped.
Dumping benefits the consumers in the importing country who can buy the products at
cheaper rates. The losers are the consumers in the exporting country.Dumping may also be
caused by what is known as transitional dumping. It occurs when an exporter needs to price
below marginal cost in order to maximize sales and expand market share. In this case below
cost-pricing is a kind of investment in the marketing of the product to reap profits in the long
run. Because this may require fixing price below marginal cost, it may be treated as predatorypricing. Yet, clearly it is not. Originally designed as a weapon against predatory and powerful
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
4/11
companies, the role of anti-dumping measures has changed from ensuring fair competition to
protecting inefficient competitors. They are being increasingly used against efficient
producers, especially from developing countries. Confronted with such situations developing
countries like China are formulating their own anti-dumping legislations.The bias in the
definition of dumping favors the party imposing anti-dumping duties. Dumping is consideredto exist if the export price of a product is less than the comparable price of the product or
like-product in the domestic market in the ordinary course of trade.However, when the
average export and product prices of a product are calculated, domestic sales prices below
total cost are considered beyond the ordinary course of trade and therefore excluded, while all
export prices are included, thus artificially raising the level of domestic price. This is a
discrepancy in the calculation of dumping, and thus even in cases where there is no dumping,
according to the strict definition of dumping as per the GATT Anti-dumping agreement, it
will be considered as dumping and anti-dumping measures will be unfairly levied on the
producer; whilst in true cases of dumping, a producer might be exempted from the anti-
dumping measures. Thus this arbitrariness in the calculation of dumping makes anti-dumping
an unfair mechanism that randomly levies duties on innocent producers or exempts the real
dumping producers, due to non-uniformity in the application of the anti-dumping rule.
Also, if no home market price can be found, the sales price in a third countrysurrogate
countrycan be used for comparisons. Since different countries have varying levels of
economic development and comparative advantages in different sectors, the arbitrary choice
of a third country may easily lead to the definition of dumping. Furthermore, when neither
home country nor a third country price is available, a constructed value is used which is the
sum of material and labor costs of production plus administrative, selling and general costs
plus profit. As items such as administrative costs and profits vary greatly among countriesand companies, it is not difficult to see the inherent subjectivity of the approach.Sometimes,
selling below total cost is a normal business practice, and not necessarily dumping.
According to the theory of micro-economics, so long as the price is above average variable
cost of production, a firm has incentives to continue production in the short run, in order to
minimize losses on fixed investment, in the hope that the market situation will improve later
to bring it back to profit. The duration of these short periods may vary from firm to
firm.When a product enters a foreign market the exporting firm may have to sell below total
cost of production to attract consumers or to meet the existing competition without any
intention to dominate the market, especially if the product does not enjoy the same
established reputation as similar products in the market. It is unreasonable to subject such
business practises which are normal within many countries to anti-dumping charges when
foreign companies are involved.
According to the Uruguay Round of anti-dumping code, an importing country can only apply
for anti-dumping duties when it is demonstrated that the dumped imports have indeed caused
injury to domestic industries.Yet too often in reality either due to the complexities of the
issues involved or to protectionist considerations, anti-dumping authorities determine
dumping without carefully considering whether the difficulties of domestic producers
resulted from their own efficiency or inefficiency or from the allegedly dumped products.
The consequent imposition of anti-dumping duties tends to penalize the most efficient foreign
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
5/11
producers.The problems associated with anti-dumping rules are also related to the rules of
origin. In a world with increasingly globalizing tendencies and production, a product may be
the result of production in many countries. As there is no substantive multilaterally agreed
rules of origin, the same product can be considered to have different origins by different
countries.Therefore even if dumping has been correctly determined it may be difficult to findwho the party at fault is.The application or abuse of lax anti-dumping rules penalizes foreign
producers who enjoy comparative advantages, to the benefit of inefficient domestic
producers. It also increases uncertainty in international trade, thus acting as a deterrent
against potential foreign competitors.But foreign producers are not the only victims. The
importers and industrial users of the product in the country imposing the anti-dumping duties
may become less competitive due to higher prices caused by such measures. Consumers have
to pay more for similar products. As anti-dumping rules vary for different countries, their
complaints may not be adequately represented. Even if some anti-dumping legislation
requires consideration of the views of these groups, the theory of political economy tells us
that it is unlikely for these diverse groups to be as vociferous as the concentrated producers of
an industry in lobbying activities.The abuse of anti-dumping rules hits the developing
countries harder whose exports are increasingly subject to such measures in recent years. Due
to their less diversified economies, the developing countries enjoy comparative advantage in
only a few sectors. If the export of their competitive products is obstructed by anti-dumping
measures, their foreign exchange earnings and even economic development may be
negatively affected.Furthermore, as they lack financial resources and experienced personnel
on anti-dumping law, the expenses that their exports have to pay for dealing with anti-
dumping cases increases. For developing or transitional economies undertaking economic
reforms, anti-dumping duties on exports already priced by market forces only serve to hindertheir painful process towards a full market economy and to create cynicism about the western
preaching of free trade.If an importing country finds that a trade partner subsidizes its
exports, it can invoke multilaterally agreed countervailing measures designed for this
purpose. If due to some unforeseen developments an industry of an importing country is
seriously injured with a flood of imports, the country can take measures to protect domestic
producers in accordance with WTO agreement on safeguards. Anti-dumping measures are not
an effective cure for difficult market access in another country either, because they do not
tackle the problem at its source.A number of economists argue for scrapping the anti-
dumping agreement altogether. They maintain that unless the anti-dumping laws seek to
check predatory pricing the application of the laws is welfare reducing. By seeking to protect
domestic producers who cannot face foreign competition the consumers are put to a loss.
They argue that domestic consumers benefit from low prices and if the import market is
perfectly competitive, the benefits to consumers outweigh the losses to domestic producers.
The current anti-dumping agreement imposes no substantive obligations on the authorities to
take the broader public interest into account. Many countries have recommended that
investigating authorities must consider public interest before imposing anti-dumping duties.
It is not fair that the consumers be asked to pay the price for no commitment on the part of
the domestic producers even in the future to be able to take care of their interests. However, it
must be noted that public interest is not consumer interest alone. It is a much wider term
which covers in its ambit the general social welfare taking into account the larger interest of
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
6/11
various stake holders.Sporadic dumping is when the producer intends to dispose of the casual
overstock of the producers. Sales in the specified period may not be as good as expected and
the producer finds himself with surplus stock. He finds it difficult to either dispose it off in
the domestic market or to hold it for the next season for various reasons. He therefore tries to
sell it in the foreign markets at lower prices to recover some cost, which results in dumping.Sporadic dumping may be unintentional. It could be due to currency fluctuations or due to
inexperience of the exporters.Also, in sporadic dumping there is an occasional sale of a
commodity at lower costs abroad to unload an unforeseen and temporary surplus of the
commodity without having to reduce domestic prices, and persistent dumping which may
prove to be benefit to a nation since if the producer faces different marginal cost and marginal
revenue lines in each market, then it pays to charge different prices in each market. Thus,
even though the foreign markets will not be monopolized, the anti-dumping duties will cause
severe losses of producer surplus.Also, in countries like USA, according to their Robinson-
Patman Act, selling of goods at unreasonably low prices to drive out competition is
prohibited and anti-dumping duties are slapped on firms even if the impact on these
competing firms is negligent and temporary. Thus, even though antitrust laws are meant to
protect competition, anti-dumping laws are wrongly used for the same purpose because of the
simple reason that any firm would be better off without competition. An important reason
why anti-dumping laws are abused is to obtain protectionist outcomes is the definition often
used to label acts as acts of dumping. According to this definition, a firm is dumping if it sells
its products abroad below fair market value i.e. the average price of the product in its home
market. Thus, even if it charges a competitive price for its products in the foreign country,
just because they may be lower than their home market prices because of several price
determining factors such as markets, demand, tariffs, advertising and selling costs, domestictaxes, skewed market functioning and corruption amongst producers leading to artificial
deviances in prices or the company simply having lower cost of production than its foreign
counterparts, a company is allegedly dumping. The principal argument against this practice is
that if price discrimination is accepted as a valid measure domestically, how can it be called
dumping merely because it is done internationally?Also, the definition of dumping doesnt
consider the fact that normal values of goods may differ from time to time. Thus, one cannot
just compare the face value of the prices of the good in the two countries to determine the
dumping margin and impose a similar anti-dumping duty on the imports. Additionally,
because it is often difficult to prove that foreign firms charge higher prices to domestic than
export customers, many a times a supposedly fair price based on estimates of foreign
production costs is used to calculate the dumping margins. This fair price can interfere with
perfectly legal business practices such firms willingly incurring losses to sell its goods and
simultaneously reducing its costs through experience or making an entry into a new
market.The WTO rules do not define market economy conditions. Thus, each member has
broad discretion in setting the conditions in antidumping allegations and taking advantage of
these loopholes to demand protection.Since, anti-dumping duties are discriminatory, it
implies that the domestic industry can use this instrument to their benefit and target only
those foreign firms it views as market rivals. Also, in case of multinational firms, the
definitions of domestic and foreign firms are often blurred. Since they produce diverse
products, one company may be treated as a domestic firm that seeks protection from
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
7/11
dumping, while for another product it may be treated as a foreign firm.The WTO does
mandate that the above factors be taken into consideration when determining whether or not
dumping is occurring. However, many developing nations and some industrialized nations
believe that the most nations do not carry out this obligation in order to gain or keep the
political favor of specific groups of voters.There is still much confusion as to whethercountries are actually using WTOs standards or not in their dumping investigations. There
are many theoretical problems with some anti-dumping procedures. Allegations of unfair
investigations abound. The WTO's Antidumping Agreement was made very complex to help
to deal with these problems. However, it has become too opaque to be able to correctly
determine the validity of some anti-dumping measures; thus arbitrarily imposing anti-
dumping charges on efficient and innocent producers, posing to be a serious threat to the
international market and jeopardizing the concept of free trade.
RATIONALE BEHIND ANTI-DUMPING LAWS
The purpose of anti dumping duty is to rectify the trade distortive effect of dumping and re-
establish fair trade. The use of anti dumping measure as an instrument of fair competition is
permitted by the WTO. In fact, anti dumping is an instrument for ensuring fair trade and is
not a measure of protection for the domestic industry. It provides relief to the domestic
industry against the injury caused by dumping.Adam Smith noted that by restraining, either
by high duties, or by absolute prohibitions, the importation of such goods from foreign
countries as can be produced at home, the monopoly of the home market is more or less
secured to the domestic industry employed in producing them. It can be inferred from his
writings generally that he was of the view that by imposing duties, imports that harm
domestic industries should be discouraged.Anti-Dumping is a reactionary measure to thedumping of goods into a foreign market. When a country feels that another country is
dumping goods into its economy it may institute anti-dumping measures to protect the
interests of the domestic producers of that good. The exponents of anti-dumping justify it on
the ground that it is a defense mechanism in the hands of the importing country to safeguard
their domestic producers.The primary justification for anti-dumping measures is the
perceived threat of predatory dumping. In an imperfectly competitive and segmented market
i.e. where the prices of goods are controlled by firms and not by the market forces, and
consumers have minimum access to goods meant for export purposes, respectively, dumping
can prove to be profit-maximising strategy for a monopolist firm.Firms may indulge in
predatory dumping, wherein the prices of their goods in the foreign markets are reduced
temporarily.The lower price imports could decrease the amount of domestic products
purchased, and domestic companies may not be able to lower their prices in order to compete
with these imports, driving these local firms out of business. These foreign firms then
command the prices, taking advantage of their newly acquired monopolistic status and cause
material injuryin the form of economic retardations of the locally established industries.The
cumulative effect of these injuries, it is contended, will finally lead to job losses, slowdown
of economic growth and spread of non-competitiveness.In such cases it is argued that anti-
dumping measures are justified as they protect domestic industries from unfair competition
from abroad, help in restoring the domestic economies and may thus prove to be prudent
measures. By imposing anti-dumping duties, dumped imports are discouraged and domestic
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
8/11
firms maximize their own production and profits.It must be recorded however, that predatory
dumping is a rarity because it assumes capital market imperfection and an irregularity in
financial resources that favor foreign producers. It also assumes an impossible coordination
between firms to precisely calculate when and how much to dump to drive domestic
industries out of business. Additionally, since it is difficult to determine whether dumping ispredatory or not, domestic producers demand protection against any form of dumping even if
it actually not harmful.From a petitioners point of view, anti-dumping stand out since it is a
good instrument to obtain protection because imposing other restrictions like import tariffs or
voluntary export restraints are inconsistent with the norms of the WTO and most
governments are not open to help domestic producers with protection. Also, anti-dumping
producers can disguise their fear of being destroyed by gigantic foreign rivals by asking for
protection and accusing these foreign competitors of unfair trade practice. The main
argument advanced for taking an anti-dumping measure against foreign producers is that such
a step ensures that national producers get better experience than the foreign firms. It is
frequently argued that such industries bring special advantages to a country, either because
they enable domestic factors of production to earn higher returns than in other sectors of the
economy or because they generate externalities or spill over benefits for the rest of the
economy. Anti-dumping policy is the best instrument for achieving these objectives.
According to them, anti-dumping is an instrument that is necessary as it acts as a safety valve
that ensures domestic political support to trade liberalizing initiative. Anti-dumping in their
view is the price paid for the maintenance of an open trading system among nations. Anti-
dumping is a trade remedy for domestic producers injured by cheap imports.It is a tool that
discourages predatory dumping. Anti-dumping is a GATT/WTO legal tool that is used to
grant protection to the import competing domestic industry, which is adversely affected byfree trade.Government imposed trade barriers and government-tolerated anti-competitive
practices permit domestic producers to create monopolies in their home market. This enables
them to charge a low price in export markets and compensate the loss by charging higher
process in the domestic market without attracting foreign entry.Producers in the importing
countries fail to expand capacity, to improve productivity and to use all resources efficiently.
The distorted price signals in the market thus stimulate overproduction of the exportable
goods and underproduction of importable goods. This in turn leads to a chronic oversupply
by inefficient producers on one hand and the closure of otherwise competitive facilities on the
other, reducing worldwide efficiency. Anti-dumping duties restore relative pricing to
prevailing world market conditions and hence efficient resource allocation.The main reason
why international price discrimination is usually considered unfair is that a dominant firm,
exporting its surplus over domestic profit-maximizing sales at lower prices, can benefit from
economies of scale in production which its competitors abroad are not able to achieve. Such a
system could be sustained as long as its home market remains protected. However, such
conduct enhances competition in the export market as long as the firm sets export prices at or
above cost. Selling abroad at a loss could only be rational for predatory purposes.
Objectives of dumping
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
9/11
1. To enter into a foreign marketdumping may be resorted to make an entry in a foreign
market with subsidies being provided by the government
2. To dispose of occasional surplus at a lower price in foreign markets
3. To develop a market in foreign countries by selling at a lower price in the initial stages just
as new markets van be developed in the country itself by selling at lower prices.
Effects of dumping:-
On the importing country
1. Domestic industry might be affected adversely by a decline in sales and profits. Indian
steel industry was affected by Chinese dumping of steel.
2. If dumping is continued for a longer period, survival of the domestic industry may bethreatened.
3. Dumping may create balance of payments problems for the country subjected dumping.
Predatory dumping is when there are exports at low prices to drive out rivals and establish
monopoly power in the importing market. There is an elimination of competition in the
importing markets with the intent of recouping the loss at a later date. This type of dumping
creates monopolies and damages productive capacity of the importing country. It harms
consumers and producers in the long run.Permanent dumping is continuous and for many
years. It occurs when a producer intends to obtain full production from the existing capacity
without cutting the domestic prices or he intends to obtain various economies of larger scale
of production without cutting the domestic prices. In sectors where scale economies are
important, firms can limit the domestic supply to charge higher prices to maximise profits.
For operating at full capacity or to avail of full economies of scale advantages, they look for
export markets and charge lower prices because market power is less. Thus the firms produce
a surplus output with intent to dump on to export markets.Import competition adversely
affects domestic producers who are unable to compete with the low prices of foreign
competitors. Anti-dumping measures will help protect domestic producers and is the only
mechanism that countries currently have against foreign producers, in order to survive in a
world market.
CONCLUSION
The use of anti-dumping measures as a trade protection tool has increased phenomenally
during the last decade. One significant aspect of this new trend is the increasing involvement
of developing countries. India is one such country which has emerged as a frequent user of
anti-dumping measures.Those in favor of anti-dumping duties argue that it is a tool of
protection in the hands of the domestic producers against the cheaper foreign imports. Critics
of anti-dumping duties though find it difficult to prove the fact that the imposition of anti-dumping duties results in economic benefits to the domestic industry. Consumers are
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
10/11
aggrieved as well, as they feel deprived of the lower costs and availability of variety of
goods. The role of the government in tackling the problem of anti-dumping should be to
protect the smaller industries rather than concentrating on the major industries. This is
because, it is these small scale industries which suffer the most as a result of imposition of
anti-dumping duties.However, safeguarding competition in domestic industry is not the onlypurpose that anti-dumping laws serve and in the present situation, they are acting as barriers
for free trade and domestic producers are concerned about avoiding competition.In case of
allegations and anti-dumping duties slapped on economically weaker nations, it could result
in a stunt of economic growth for these developing countries, as they are unable to develop
secure and stable long term industries. Even the threat of imposition of anti-dumping duties
has a serious adverse effect on the functioning of small and medium size firms, resulting in a
fall in production, heavy unemployment and declines in incomes and increases in poverty
levels.Anti-dumping duties were imposed by developed countries to protect their industries
against the low priced imports.Right from the beginning there was a clear division between
the fundamental aims of those countries whose exports were most commonly exposed to anti-
dumping action (developing countries) and those which took such action (mostly developed
countries). Developing countries wanted anti-dumping rules to be tight and explicit as
possible, allowing minimum transparency. Developed countries wanted to retain and even
expand their discretion to meet what they saw as being used by companies to get around the
present rules of anti-dumping code and thereby cause injury to domestic industry, their
proposals tended to be the most radical and controversial. The wage rate differs from country
to country, the economies differ and the demand levels are also different. It is a settled
economic fact that firms are guided by profit-maximizing motives. The profits keep
increasing till the time that marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost. To allow marginalcost based pricing to adversely affect industry in other countries cannot be justified on social
welfare grounds. The capital dumped in the concerned industry and the employment
generated by that industry cannot be allowed to go non-functional. This is not to say that the
industry should be protected at all costs. The negotiating stance of developing countries like
India should be for tightening the agreement. This is because India is a victim if the costs and
benefits to different industry segments are assessed at an aggregate level. Even though
abolishment of these anti-dumping laws will lead to increased competition, lower prices for
consumers, more efficient production, and higher national income, it is unrealistic to hope
that the WTO will remove this trade device in the near future. But before things worsen, an
immediate reform is necessary and the WTO anti-dumping rules need to be amended to allow
a more transparent process of investigation and to determine correctly whether the material
injury caused is because of dumping or higher competition only. The WTO rules need to be
formulated so as to target only predatory dumping and not persistent or sporadic dumping.
All countries need to have the uniform standards for determination of the dumping margins
so as to maintain fairness. While aiming at consumer welfare, it is necessary to justify the use
of anti-dumping laws as tools against unfair trade, to reconsider its definition and analyze as
to what is essentially fair and whats not and keeping in mind the gross abuse of anti-
dumping laws answer the very fundamental question of whether these laws are necessary at
all.As economics, anti-dumping action looks at only half of the economic impact on the
domestic economy. It gives standing to import competing domestic interests, but not to
-
8/2/2019 Dumping Eco
11/11
domestic users, be they user enterprises or consumers. As politics, it undercuts rather than
supports a policy of openness; by giving voice to only the negative impact of trade on
domestic interests and by inviting such interests to blame their problems on the "unfairness"
of foreigners. The key characteristic of a sensible safeguard procedure is that it treats
domestic interests that would be harmed by an import restriction, equally with those domesticinterests that would benefit. The "morality" of the foreign interest is irrelevant - the issue is
the plus and minus on the domestic economy. Operationally, this suggestion means simply
that what is done in an "injury test," - identification of impact on import competing interests -
is repeated for users of imports.Some argue that there must be more rigorous anti-dumping
rules that must be formulated at the domestic and international level. The notion of predatory
pricing must be clearly incorporated in the definition of dumping. The burden of proof of
dumping must be placed squarely on the party initiating dumping cases. The implementation
of anti-dumping measures should be subject to the close inspection of the WTO. Countries
should more amply inform their public of the costs and benefits of anti-dumping measures so
as to promote an unbiased and fair public opinion on this matter. These measures would
ensure that anti-dumping laws are fairly applied and assist only those producers who suffer as
a result of the low prices, and not arbitrarily affect the production of efficient producers who
are not in error
Competition Law in India
Competition law is a specific law which has the objective of promoting/ maintaining
competition in the markets by regulating anti-competitive conduct. It is also known as
antitrust law in the United States. The history of competition law reaches back to the Roman
Empire. Since the 20th century, competition law has become global. Now, more than hundred
countries have adopted competition law as a natural corollary to embracing economic reforms
and market economies.Indias earlier Competition related law - Monopolies and Restrictive
Practices Act, 1969 became outdated after liberalization of economy in 1991. Competition
Act, 2002 was passed in January 2003 with the objective ofpreventing practices having
adverse effect on competition, promoting and sustaining competition in markets, protecting
the interests of consumers and ensuring freedom of trade carried on market participant.
Competition Commission of India (CCI) was set up in October 2003 to implement the law.
However, legal challenge prevented full constitution and enforcement and only advocacy
function was notified. Law was amended in 2007. Law is being implemented by CompetitionCommission of India (CCI), which was constituted in 2009 as an autonomous independent
body comprising Chairperson and six members. Appeal lies to Competition Appellate
Tribunal also set up in 2009 with final appeal to Supreme Court of India. The Competition
Act, 2002 (as amended), [the Act] aims at protecting Indian markets against anti-competitive
practices by enterprises. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant
position by enterprises, and regulates entering into combinations with a view to ensure that
there is no adverse effect on competition in India.