Duct Design and Installation

download Duct Design and Installation

of 61

Transcript of Duct Design and Installation

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    1/61

    Duct Design and InstallationDuct Design and Installation

    John Proctor, P.E.

    Proctor Engineering Group, Ltd.

    San Rafael, CA

    1-888-455-5742 [email protected] www.proctoreng.com

    2004 Proctor Engineering Group, Ltd.

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    2/61

    Duct DesignDuct Design

    ACCA Manuals J, T, and D or Equivalent

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    3/61

    Proper Design & Selection Estimate LoadsProper Design & Selection Estimate Loads

    1. Determine Design Heating Loads

    2. Determine Design Cooling Loads Sensible and Latent

    3. Determine the airflow required to eachroom

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    4/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    5/61

    A Good Duct Design ProvidesA Good Duct Design Provides

    Quiet

    Efficient

    Comfort

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    6/61

    Recommended Velocity (in fpm)Recommended Velocity (in fpm)

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    7/61

    EfficientEfficient FAN WATT DRAW REDUCTION

    SUFFICIENT AIRFLOW

    LOW DUCT LEAKAGE

    SEAL WITH MASTIC OR SNAP-DUCT

    PUT INSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE

    LOW CONDUCTION LOSS

    SHORT RUNS

    FEWER LARGER DIAMETER RUNS

    PUT INSIDE THE CONDITIONED SPACE

    USE METAL DUCT AND FITTINGS

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    8/61

    ComfortComfort

    TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE

    BETWEEN ROOMS

    < 2 F IDEAL

    4 F MAXIMUM

    SO USE A CONTINUOUS FAN? NO

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    9/61

    Why not just add anElectrically Commutated Motor (ECM)

    and use a continuous fan?

    Why not just add anElectrically Commutated Motor (ECM)

    and use a continuous fan?

    1. An ECM uses as

    much powerrunningcontinuously asa PSC motor

    does running onAuto(Scott Pigg,Wisconsin Study)

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    PSC Motor ECM

    Annu

    alkWh

    Continuous Fan Auto Fan

    2. Continuous duct leakage losses and conduction losses

    3. ECM motors are not magic When pressures are too high they canuse more electricity and burnout

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    10/61

    ECM Motors Maintain Airflow (up to apoint) but can use more watts than a PSCECM Motors Maintain Airflow (up to apoint) but can use more watts than a PSC

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1,000

    1,200

    1,400

    1,600

    1,800

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    Static Pressure (IW)

    Airflow

    (CFM)

    ECM

    PSC

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    Static Pressure (IW)

    Wa

    tts

    ECM

    PSC

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    11/61

    Comfort comes from a designedsystemComfort comes from a designedsystem

    Duct System Must Be Designed to Deliver CorrectAmount of Air to Each Supply Terminal

    AND

    Each Supply Terminal Must Be Carefully Sized andLocated

    AND

    Each Supply Terminal Must Be Chosen With AdequateMixing and Throw

    AND

    There Must Be an Adequate Return Path for EachSupply

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    12/61

    SUPPLY LOCATION (old recommendation)

    PERIMETERUP OUTSIDE WALL (HEATING)

    CEILINGPARALLEL TO CEILING OUT TO

    WALLS(COOLING)

    HIGH INSIDE WALLPARALLEL TO CEILING TO OUTSIDE

    WALL (COOLING)

    TerminalsTerminalsTerminals

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    13/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    14/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    15/61

    Returns Adequate Air PathwaysReturns Adequate Air Pathways

    High Cost

    Excessive Duct Leakage

    Unnecessary in OpenFloor Plan

    Adequate Return PathsEvery Room

    Potential for InadequateReturn Pathways(Pressure)

    Potential for Noise

    Low Cost

    Provides Accessible FilterLocation

    Low Surface Area

    Single

    DisadvantagesAdvantagesReturn Type

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    16/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    17/61

    Duct Design ConsiderationsDuct Design Considerations

    WHAT DETERMINES FLOW THROUGH UNIT?

    EXTERNAL SYSTEM = EQUIPMENT

    PRESSURE DROP PRESSURE GAIN

    AT DESIRED FLOW

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    18/61

    External System Pressure Drop =Equipment Pressure Gain

    External System Pressure Drop =Equipment Pressure Gain

    External System

    Pressure Drop

    Fan Pressure

    Gain

    Operating

    Point

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    19/61

    Generic External SystemPressure Drops

    Generic External SystemPressure Drops

    DEVICE

    Standard FilterHigh Efficiency Filter

    Humidifiers/Electric Heaters

    Supply Outlet

    Return Grille

    Balancing Damper

    Coil

    Duct System

    PRESSURE DROP

    .10 Clean

    .20 Clean

    .10 to .20

    .03

    .03

    .03 Open

    .15 to .45 wet coil

    What is left

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    20/61

    Coil Pressure DropCoil Pressure Drop

    0.451400

    0.331200

    0.231000

    Static Pressure(Wet Coil)

    CFM

    G2FD036(S,H)21(T)

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    21/61

    Filter pressure drop is .05 0.24 in H2OMedian is 0.15Filter pressure drop is .05 0.24 in H2OMedian is 0.15

    Cooling Filter Pressure Drop

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    Number

    in

    ofwater

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    22/61

    20" X 20" MERV 8 Air Filter

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    Air Flow (CFM)

    StaticPre

    ssureDrop

    New Filter

    Filter Loading

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    23/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    24/61

    Example Pressure DropExample Pressure Drop

    DEVICE

    Supply RegisterReturn Grille

    Balancing Damper

    Coil

    Total EXCLUDING DUCTS

    PRESSURE DROP

    .03

    .03

    .03

    .33 wet coil

    .42

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    25/61

    Equipment Pressure GainEquipment Pressure Gain

    .45 IWC at 1200 cfm

    C k l 03 IWC

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    26/61

    Cannot work only .03 IWCavailable for duct systemCannot work only .03 IWCavailable for duct system

    WHAT DETERMINES FLOW THROUGH UNIT?

    EXTERNAL SYSTEM = EQUIPMENT

    PRESSURE DROP PRESSURE GAIN

    AT DESIRED FLOW

    1200 cfm

    0.42 IWC +

    Ducts

    0.45 IWC

    i k i h ll i dlSti k ith S ll Ai H dl

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    27/61

    Stick with Smaller Air Handler Smaller Fan MotorStick with Smaller Air Handler Smaller Fan Motor

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    28/61

    SolutionSolution

    Keep smaller air handler

    Use a less restrictive coil (0.21 IWC)Drop the dampers

    External system pressure drop becomes:

    Return Grille .03 Supply Register .03

    Coil .21

    TOTAL .27 + Ducts

    Equipment Pressure at Med. Hi and 1200 cfm 0.45

    Available for ducts 0.45 0.27 = 0.18

    N d k hN d t k th

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    29/61

    Now we need to know thefriction rate (IWC/100 ft.)Now we need to know thefriction rate (IWC/100 ft.)

    We have an available static pressure of

    0.18 Inches of Water ColumnWhat do we want to divide that by to get

    the friction rate?

    The Total Effective Length

    H L i th D t S t ?H L i th D t S t ?

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    30/61

    How Long is the Duct System?(from an air molecule's view)

    How Long is the Duct System?(from an air molecule's view)

    A 200 ft. straight pipe is 200 feet long

    This 4 ft. section of pipe is how long?

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    31/61

    30 ft.4-J80 ft.4-G

    EffectiveLength

    FittingNumber

    Supply BootsSupply Boots

    4-J

    4-G

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    32/61

    40 ft.1-P withVanes

    60 ft.1-O

    EffectiveLength

    FittingNumber

    1-O1-P

    2-A 2-B

    5045403530202-B8070655545352-A

    5 or+

    43210DownstreamBranches

    Supply Plenums and TakeoffsSupply Plenums and Takeoffs

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    33/61

    Furnace

    Plenum

    Trunk

    Run 1

    Run 2

    4-G

    4-J

    2-A

    2-B

    5 ft. 15 ft.

    10ft.

    10ft.

    1-O

    A Simple Duct DesignA Simple Duct Design

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    34/61

    Trunk

    Run 2

    4-J

    2-B

    20ft.

    Run 6

    4-J

    2-B

    12ft.

    1-P

    A Less Simple Duct DesignA Less Simple Duct Design

    Furnace

    Plenum

    160 ft EL Return

    Run 1

    4-J 4-J 4-J

    12ft.

    10ft.

    5 ft.5 ft.

    2-B 2-B2-B5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.5 ft.

    Run 3

    4-J

    2-B

    12ft.

    18ft.

    550 CFM

    90 CFM

    C l l t th T t l Eff ti L thC l l t th T t l Eff ti L th

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    35/61

    Calculate the Total Effective Lengthfrom the return grille to the supply

    register

    Calculate the Total Effective Lengthfrom the return grille to the supply

    register

    A simple takeoff can be as little as 10 feet

    Or as much as 115 feet

    Through good design we got the overallequivalent length to 300 feet

    So we have 0.18 IWC available staticpressure over 300 ft.

    The friction factor is .06 IWC per 100 ft(0.18/300 = 0.06)

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    36/61

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    37/61

    Recommended Velocity (in fpm)Recommended Velocity (in fpm)

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    38/61

    Why not just use 0.10 IWC /100 ft.Friction Rate on a Ductalator?Why not just use 0.10 IWC /100 ft.Friction Rate on a Ductalator?

    BECAUSE

    DESIGN VALUE FOR FRICTION RATE IS

    NOT ARBITRARY

    FRICTION RATE DESIGN VALUE

    DEPENDS ON AVAILABLE STATIC

    PRESSURE AND TOTAL EFFECTIVE

    LENGTH

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    39/61

    Desirable DesignDesirable Design

    SHORT DUCT RUNS

    LOW STATIC PRESSURES

    INSIDE CONDITIONED SPACE

    GOOD THROW ON REGISTERS

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    40/61

    Duct InstallationDuct Installation

    Put in what is designed

    Straight Leakless

    Proper Flow

    Proper Distribution

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    41/61

    Duct TestingDuct Testing

    Leakage

    FlowDistribution

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    42/61

    Duct Leakage in Existing HomesDuct Leakage in Existing Homes

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    %

    ofSample

    5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% >80%

    CFM 25 / Nominal Airflow

    Sample size: 1210 (no mobile homes)

    Test method: Duct Blaster at 25 pa. (0.10WC)Source: CheckMe! database

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    43/61

    Duct Sealing Saves Energy and PeakDuct Sealing Saves Energy and PeakRequired Sensible Cooling (BTUh)

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 12

    Manual J7

    16% Supply Leakage, 11% Return Leakage

    2%Supply Leakage, 11% Return Leakage

    2% Supply Leakage, 3% Return Leakage

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    44/61

    DUCT LEAKAGE TESTINGDUCT LEAKAGE TESTING

    Total Leakage

    Leakage to Outside

    Supply Side Leakage

    Return Side LeakageOperating Leakage

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    45/61

    TOTAL LEAKAGE SET-UPTOTAL LEAKAGE SET-UP

    REMOVE FILTERS

    MOUNT DUCT BLASTER @ AH ORRETURN GRILLE

    ALL SUPPLY REGISTERS COVERED

    ALL RETURN GRILLES COVEREDDUCT TEST REFERENCE PRESSURE IN

    SUPPLY PLENUM (STATIC PRESSURE

    PROBE)

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    46/61

    Duct Blaster Test MethodDuct Blaster Test Method

    MEASURE CFM TO KEEPDUCTS AT 25 PA

    MEASURE CFM TO KEEPDUCTS AT 25 PA

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    47/61

    DUCT TESTING PROCEDUREDUCT TESTING PROCEDURE

    KEEP FAN PRESSURE ABOVE 30 PASCALS

    (SWITCH FLOW RING IF NEEDED)

    FLOW RING SELECTION

    OPEN 1,500 TO 500RING 1 800 TO 200RING 2 300 TO 75RING 3 125 TO 30

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    48/61

    Duct Leakage StandardsDuct Leakage Standards

    CFM 25 as % of Cooling Nominal

    Flow Nominal Flow as 400 CFM per ton

    5%, 6%, 8%

    CFM 25 as % of Actual FlowCFM 25 as % of Floor Area

    L Ai fl

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    49/61

    Low Airflow

    All of the audited forced air systems showed low air handler flowDanny Parker Florida Study 1997

    Arizona NewConstructionBlasnik et al.1996

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    50/61

    Measuring AirflowMeasuring Airflow Temperature Split Method

    Duct Blaster Flow Capture Hood

    Flow Grid Coil Pressure Drop

    Fan Curve

    Pitot Tube Traverse Anemometer

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    51/61

    AC Temperature SplitAC Temperature SplitRun to steady state (15 minutes)

    Measure return wet bulb and dry bulbtemperatures

    Measure the supply dry bulb temperature

    This is the most critical part of theprocedure

    System stabilized

    The measured temperatures as close to the mixedPLENUM AIR TEMPERATURES

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    52/61

    55 80

    67 wb

    D t i i T tD t i i T t

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    53/61

    Determining Target

    Temperature Split

    Determining Target

    Temperature Split Target temperature split is not constant

    Target temperature split varies with Return dry bulb

    Return wet bulb

    Determine the target temperature split Based on chart or slide rule

    Maximum TemperatureMaximum Temperature

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    54/61

    Maximum TemperatureSplit TableMaximum TemperatureSplit Table

    Return Air Wet-Bulb (F)

    50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74

    70 23.9 23.6 23.1 22.5 21.7 20.7 19.5 18.2 16.7 14.9 1372 24.9 24.7 24.2 23.6 22.8 21.8 20.6 19.3 17.7 16 14.1 12

    74 26 25.8 25.3 24.7 23.9 22.9 21.7 20.4 18.8 17.1 15.2 13.1

    76 27.1 26.9 26.4 25.8 25 24 22.8 21.5 19.9 18.2 16.3 14.2 11.9

    78 - - 27.5 26.9 26.1 25.1 23.9 22.5 21 19.3 17.4 15.3 13

    80 - - - 28 27.2 26.2 25 23.6 22.1 20.4 18.5 16.4 14.1

    82 - - - - 28.2 27.2 26.1 24.7 23.2 21.5 19.6 17.5 15.2

    Return

    AirDryBul

    b

    (F)

    84 - - - - - 28.3 27.2 25.8 24.3 22.5 20.6 18.6 16.3

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    55/61

    TrueFlow Flow GridTrueFlow Flow Grid

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    56/61

    Grid Installs in Filter SlotGrid Installs in Filter Slot

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    57/61

    Duct Blaster Test MethodDuct Blaster Test Method

    Take supply static pressurewith air conditioner running

    Block blower compartmentfrom return system

    Install Duct Blaster on theblower compartment door

    Turn on air handler

    Adjust Duct Blaster speed toduplicate supply static

    Read airflow from DuctBlaster

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    58/61

    Desired Air FlowDesired Air Flow

    450Above 0.85

    4000.80 to 0.85

    3500.74 to 0.79

    300Below 0.74

    CFM per TonSHR

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    59/61

    Flow to RoomsFlow to Rooms

    Within +- 10%

    +- 20% Max.

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    60/61

    Write the Specifications

    Sign the ContractBreathe Easy --- NOT

    Write the Specifications

    Sign the ContractBreathe Easy --- NOT

    Any equipment installed must perform asintended

    These items are accomplished by

    human beings and are subject to error.

    With Initial Feedback the Crews Learned RapidlyWith Initial Feedback the Crews Learned Rapidly

  • 8/3/2019 Duct Design and Installation

    61/61

    With Initial Feedback the Crews Learned Rapidly.With Continued Feedback They Maintained GoodSavings

    When Feedback Was Removed the Savings Droppedto 30% of the Maximum

    With Initial Feedback the Crews Learned Rapidly.With Continued Feedback They Maintained GoodSavings

    When Feedback Was Removed the Savings Droppedto 30% of the Maximum

    Measured Savings

    as a Percent of Achievable Savings

    (running average)

    0%

    20%

    40%60%

    80%

    100%

    Program Startup, Learning Curve with Technician Feedback

    Production with Feedback Maintained

    Disaster when Feedback was Removed