Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition...

24
Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy

Transcript of Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition...

Page 1: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Dry Mill Ethanol PlantsEnvironmental Impacts

and Future Growth

Presented to Governor’s Coalition

February 10, 2006by Bill Roddy

Page 2: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.
Page 3: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

110 MGY

Page 4: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Dry Mill Industry Evolution

Plants in operation during each decade:● 1980’s -175 Plants (20K to 7M gallons)● 1990’s - 33 Plants (1.5M to 30M gallons)● 2000’s - 91 Plants (30M to 110M gallons)● ICM has 37 Plants in operation today

ranging from 5 M to 110 M gallons

Page 5: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.
Page 6: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

ICM Process Guarantees

• Ethanol-2.80 denatured (@ 5%) gallons per bushel

• Natural Gas-34,000 BTU per denatured gallon of ethanol with DDGS (22,000 wet cake only)

• Electrical - 0.75 Kw per denatured gallon per hour

• Emissions compliance – Written guarantee

Page 7: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

"Potential to Emit" Preliminary Estimate: 100% DDGS Capability

Bushmills Ethanol: 49 MMgpy (permitted), 500,000 tons/yr grain (17,857,144 bu/yr), 162,218 tpy DDGS

Page 8: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Agri-Farms, LLC Necedah, WI 50 MMGPY

Hawkeye Renewables Expansion Iowa Falls, IA from 40 to 80 MMGPY

Hawkeye Renewables – Fairbank Fairbank, IA 100 MMGPY

Lincolnway Energy Nevada, IA 50 MMGPY

US Bioenergy Albert City, IA 100 MMGPY

Western Wisconsin Ethanol Boyceville, WI 40 MMGPY

Heron Lake Ethanol Heron Lake, MN 50 MMGPY

Superior Corn Products Lake Odessa, MI 40 MMGPY

Red Trail Ethanol Richardton, ND 50 MMGPY

Front Range Energy Windsor, CO 40 MMGPY

Suncor Sarnia, ONT 50 MMGPY

Commercial Alcohol Varennes, QUE 30 MMGPY

Trenton Agri Energy Expansion Trenton, NE from 30 to 40 MMGPY

Commonwealth Agri Energy Expansion Hopkinsville, KYfrom 20 to 33 MMGPY

Prairie Horizon Agri-Energy Phillipsburg, KS 30 MMGPY

The Andersons Albion Ethanol Albion, MI 55 MMGPY

Illinois River Energy LLC Rochelle, IL 50 MMGPY

Heartland Grain Fuels LP Expansion Huron, SD from 14 to 30 MMGPY

Iroquois BioEnergy Co. LLC Rensselear, IN 40 MMGPY

GLE Redfield Redfield, SD 40 MMGPY

Aventine Renewable Energy Inc Pekin, IL 60 MMGPY

Ethanol Grain Processors Washington, KS 30 MMGPY

Anderson’s Grain – Clymers Clymers, IN 110 MMGPY

Demeter Bloomingburg Bloomingburg, OH 100 MMGPY

Platte Valley Ethanol Expansion Central City, NE from 40 to 80 MMGPY

Big River Resources Expansion West Burlington, IA from 40 to 80 MMGPY

Blue Flint Ethanol Underwood, ND 50 MMGPY

Siouxland Ethanol Jackson, NE 50 MMGPY

ICM Plants Under Construction

Page 9: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Environmental Approvals

● Air Permit● Non Contact Water Discharge (irrigation, POTW, or

surface water)● Storm water NOI & SWP2● Above Ground Storage Tanks● Water Allocation Permit (supply)● Endangered Species● Historical and Archaeological● Environmental Assessment (e.g., MN)

Note: ICM Plants are CESQGs

Page 10: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Energy Balance

● All Studies (with exception of Professor David Pimental of Cornell) cite a net energy gain of 34% for dry mill fuel ethanol manufacture.

● Ethanol: 84,000 Btu/gal & octane 130 (compares to gasoline at 125,000 Btu/gal)

● Driving forces include; improved farming efficiencies (e.g., no till), better chemicals for weed and insect control for fewer trips in field, improved manufacturing efficiencies.

Page 11: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Required Equipment:● Dryer Emissions: Thermal Oxidizer● Product Loadout: Flare● Fermentation: Improved Scrubbers● Fugitive VOCs: Leak Detection and Repair● Road Dust: Street Sweeping● Process Dust: Baghouses● Cost:

$1.5 - $2.0 Million per plant (equipment)

$30,000 - $50,000 per plant (fines)

Impact of EPA’s Consent Decrees

Page 12: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Thermal Oxidizer

Steam Generator

Combustion Section

Steam DrumExhaust Stack

Combustion Air & Natural Gas

Water In

Steam Out To Process

Approximately1500 F(Final temp determinedin compliance test)

Rotary DrumDryer

Exhaust

Thermal Oxidizer/Heat Recovery Steam Generator

Page 13: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

ICM Thermal Oxidization System

Page 14: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

ICM Fermentation Scrubber

Page 15: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Key Emission Standards● NOx, CO, VOCs (scaled), PM/PM10, SO2 are

guaranteed by ICM to be less than 100 tpy each for the following: Gas Fired Steam Generation (by TO or Boilers): 100

Mgpy Coal Fired (ICM’s Clean Coal Technology; Bubbling

Fluid Bed with limestone/lime & ammonia injection & baghouse): 50 Mgpy

● HAPs are guaranteed to be less than 10/25 tpy for Gas and Coal Configurations

Page 16: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Example Water Discharge*

● Source: Cooling Tower, Multi Media Filter, RO & Softener (all non contact water)

● Volume: 100 gpm● Total Dissolved Solids: 3,000 mg/l (controlled by

cooling tower cycles)● Chlorides: 40 mg/l● Conductivity: 5000 μmhos/centimeter● pH: 6.5 – 9.0● Temperature: < 90° F

*State Dependent, Water Source Dependent

Page 17: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Nuisance Odor

ICM recommends development of an “Odor Action Plan” as follows: (not a regulatory requirement)

● A single odor complaint will be immediately investigated and “validated.”

● The source of odor will be corrected or shut down and repaired.

● The plant shut will shut down if necessary to correct the source of nuisance odor.

● In case of TO failure, the plant automatically shuts down.

Page 18: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Brantford, Ontario, March 10, 2003 - The tour bus was stopped directly downwind of the ethanol plant in Monroe, Wisconsin and many got out to sniff the air. “I was very impressed with the fact that there was hardly any odor at all from the plant”, said Edith Davis, wife of Roger Davis of Davis Petroleum. “One of the reasons I came along on this tour was to make sure that the proposed ethanol plant would be a good neighbor to our community, and I am now more convinced than ever that it will be.”

Nuisance Odor?

Page 19: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Environmental Impacts● Plants are engineered to have insignificant impact on

the surrounding environment.● Water Discharge quality is engineered to meet state

standards (irrigation, surface water or POTW).● When using groundwater, test wells are installed and

groundwater is monitored prior to construction to insure the water table can handle 500 gpm (typical 50 Mgy plant) without impacting the water table or nearby wells.

Page 20: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

● Erosion and sedimentation during construction are minimized with a stormwater pollution prevention plan.

● Surface runoff is controlled by stormwater pond and released after inspection.

● Process waste water is returned to the process after treating in an anaerobic digester called the biomentanator.

● The biomethanator gas (methane) displaces natural gas in the DDGS Dryer.

● Tanks are sited in an impervious secondary containment area.

Environmental Impacts (cont.)

Page 21: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

● Stationary source air emissions qualify the source as a “synthetic” minor source.

● Noise levels will not exceed 80 dB off property.● Potential for nuisance odor is minimized with the

Best Available Control Technology and Odor Action Plan.

● ICM’s plants typically assure that no adverse impact on nearby natural resources will occur.

● Wetlands are typically avoided.

Environmental Impacts (cont.)

Page 22: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Bad Batch (Due to Infection)

● Continue to process wet cake or DDG● Blend it back in● Truck to municipal waste plant

DO NOT:Goals:● Avoiding

Land application Land filling

Page 23: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

ICM’s Future

● ICM’s backlog: Nearly 100 US plants in planning stages 6 foreign plants in planning stages 1 Canadian plant under construction (50 MGY)

● Predicted sizes: 50 to 110 MGY range 200 MGY under discussion

● Demand for coal energy increasing ICM’s first coal plant is operational (50 MGY) Coal guarantee currently limited to PRB coal (0.25%

sulfur)

Page 24: Dry Mill Ethanol Plants Environmental Impacts and Future Growth Presented to Governor’s Coalition February 10, 2006 by Bill Roddy.

Questions?