Driving rapid client experience improvement in GBS · McKinsey & Company | 6 Test lab setup steps...
Transcript of Driving rapid client experience improvement in GBS · McKinsey & Company | 6 Test lab setup steps...
Driving rapid client
experience improvement
in GBS
November 9, 2015
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited
McKinsey & Company | 1
Percentage of customers likely to …
Great customer experience drives real impact
Share of companies…
Percent
5
62
… having CX as a priority topic 87
… viewing themselves as CX
industry leaders
… focusing most on investing
in CX in 201213
… planning to implement
a CX program in 201325
… targeting to become CX
industry leader in 3 years54
… running some sort
of CX program in 2012
SOURCE: Oracle, 2013 B2B commerce trends; Temkin report, 2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
14131211
… upgrade or
buy additional
products
… recommend
201918171615
… cancel
… downgrade
Customer satisfaction score
Many companies think CX is important The reasons why are clear
McKinsey & Company | 2
CX is an effective frame for a broad set of initiatives – not just
service, but improvements to product, pricing and brand
The best way to improve CX is through journeys, achieving stacked
wins (NPS, churn, gross adds, call reduction, cost saving)
CX requires a heavy dose of front-line empowerment and capability
building
At the core of a CX program is an analytics “central nervous system”
to identify what matters and to whom
Key beliefs around customer experience
CX should be approached as an enterprise-wide change management
program – it is the job of everyone, not just a customer
Create a Test Lab to enable rapid testing for marketing and the
front-line
Measurement matters – the right customer-back metrics and the right
system to operationalize
McKinsey & Company | 3
Transforming the customer experience through GBS: Setting the vision
and aspirations
Vision Aspiration (illustrative)
35+ ptsNPS scores across business units
50%Reduction in client/
EE service requests
Top quartileassociate assessment of customer
service
Call to action
Fast processing of work that
matters to me
Accurate processing and service
that is done right the first time
Secure provision of services that
protects customer data
Transparent servicing that lets
the customer know what’s
happening
Customer want a “FAST”
experience Transform the customer
experience
Enable our associates to
deliver exceptional service
Enhance our competitive
price position in the market
Transformational goals…
McKinsey & Company | 4
Test labs are meant to rapidly prove or disprove the effectiveness
of initiatives by trying them in a closed loop system under stress
Test lab objectives
▪ A Test Lab to rapidly refine solution design and prove impact for
complex solutions / initiatives
▪ Closed loop learning to identify defects and root causes end to end
▪ Proof that we can meaningfully move the needle on key output
metrics (e.g., NPS, transaction volumes)
▪ “Stress the system” to prove different level of performance possible
(e.g., create system to test increased productivity)
▪ A region or site to host the trial of frontline continuous
improvement
▪ Frontline/operational evangelists that can excite their peers
McKinsey & Company | 5
Initiatives scale based on type of change
The process runs initiatives through a series of recursive sprints
before scaling through direct implementation or communication
Policy /
operational
changes
Cultural /
frontline
changes
Policy and operational changes scale
through implementation to the broader
associate base
Cultural changes and new ways of
working can scale through go-and-
see’s & other internal communications
Week 5 Week 6 Week 7
EvaluateTest
Week 16…
x4
Weeks 1-4
Setup Design
Typical lab will run 2 - 3 initiatives
at a time through a 2 week sprint
of design and test with a week for
evaluation vs. metrics
The test lab method relies on a
fast failure mentality with
recursive sprints to design,
test, and evaluate results
Number of recursive sprints depends on the
intended / realized results:
▪ Unsuccessful tests can be redesigned / re-
tested if opportunity still exists
▪ Successful tests may be discontinued if full
potential has been reached
A 4-week setup defines test
lab parameters: ring-fence,
associates, initiatives &
metric dashboards
Detail to follow
ILLUSTRATIVE
Rapid test & learn occurs in a series of recursive sprints
McKinsey & Company | 6
Test lab setup steps – 4 week process
▪ Define segment of demand which can be easily “ring-fenced” and funneled into the lab
▪ Identify a segment of demand to provide a representative sample and properly test initiatives
▪ Call out and define plan to address technological or other limitations to tagging demand that is
meant for the test lab
Actions to take
Identify client
segment to ring-
fence
Select team to
involve in exclusive
service of ring-
fenced clients
Choose initiatives
to run in the test
lab environment
Establish metrics/
dashboards track
progress through
the governance
structure
▪ Identify a critical mass of associates who:
– Can easily co-locate in the same geography as Journey leadership
– Will have ~20% more work than average if provided the work from step 1
– Can be easily back-filled if necessary to avoid disrupting operations in the “control” group
▪ Define plan for other departments / functions who need to cooperate to ensure a closed system
▪ Define initiative goals for the test lab
▪ Chose which initiatives are most appropriate given the identified client segment / associate pool
▪ Sequence initiatives to ensure proper measurement of results
▪ Define metrics which can be easily used to create a dashboard for each initiative
▪ Define plan to overcome metrics whose timeline will outpace the length of the test lab (i.e., will
not provide adequate sample size to accurately measure test lab results)
McKinsey & Company | 7
The test lab is a driver of a long-term, groundbreaking vision
for critical customer journeys
Impact
Scale
Fail
Time
Test lab
Long
term
vision
McKinsey & Company | 8
How to transform a specific customer journey: Driving the transformation
starts with a six step process Focus of today’s discussion
2. Prioritize
journeys
3. Journey
improve-
ment
4. Define
method to
operationalize
5. Launch
initiatives
6. Opera-
tionalize,
continuous
improve-
ment
1. Define aspiration
Customer
experience (CX)
transformation
Define overall CX
aspiration & Journeys
▪ Define overall
aspiration in terms of
CX / operational goals
▪ Define holistic set of
Journeys
Operationalize, continuous
improvement
▪ Operationalize each initiative
category, including securing cross-
functional resources, setting up
management system
▪ Define metrics to measure
improvement including feedback
loops
▪ Set up continuous improvement
Understand what matters to
customers to prioritize within
journeys:
▪ Analytics to understand what matters
to which customer groups
▪ Use to prioritize journeys based on
incidence & improvement potential
Launch initiatives in multiple streams
▪ Launch quick win
▪ Embed changes within functions where needed
▪ Pilot more complex initiatives in test lab before scaling
▪ Leverage IT resources where possible to automate
Define method to operationalize:
▪ Define initiatives and metrics tied back to program goals against
baselines
▪ Prioritize initiatives and develop plans based on application of
the appropriate tools (e.g., test labs)
Baseline existing
performance, define
improvement initiatives
▪ Baseline current
performance and customer
pain points and needs
▪ Define future experience
▪ Define initiatives to improve
CX and operational
performance
McKinsey & Company | 9
Reimagining the end-to-end process to address specific client pain
points (1 of 2)
Intake and validation
Notice
sent
Intake and
index
Validate
(T1)
B
Notice submission
Email/
fax
Client
calls?
Further
action
needed?
End
process
To client
Y
Y
N
N
ResearchAutoreply and segmentation
Auto
response
(~25%)
Segment-
ation
T1
able?
(queue)
AutoY
N NA
High-profile
T2 review/
queue
T1
researchResolved?
Y
How can inbound solve /
collect info upfront to
decrease end to end time
and total volume?
How can more
notices be routed
direct to decrease
time to
resolution?
RAF
notice?
Y
N
How can auto-
response be pushed
upstream to decrease
end to end time?
How can index values be
used to determine auto-
response / segmentation to
decrease end to end time?
T2
research
N
How can outreach be further
batched and/or have prearranged
call times to decrease non-value
add wait time?
Client communication
Phone communication
Email communication
Letter communication
In addition to
current test lab
initiatives
Linked to current
test lab initiatives
3
McKinsey & Company | 10
Agency
process
Distribution
for output
Client action
Audit
Reimagining the end-to-end process to address specific client pain
points (2 of 2)
Client
action
req’d?
AuditDis-
approved?Send client
pack
Agency
receives +
processesA
B
N
Client
notified
Client
action
Y
N
Y
ADP
debits (if
applicable)
Client
approves
Client
notifiedFunding
(>$2500)
Researcher
releases
Other client
action
Audit
neces-
sary?
Y
N
How can we work with
agencies to receive
receipt and processing
data to become more
transparent?
How can audit be
eliminated to decrease
end to end time without
sacrificing accuracy?
Client communication
Phone communication
Email communication
Letter communication
In addition to
current test lab
initiatives
Linked to current
test lab initiatives
3
McKinsey & Company | 11
The test lab will aim to reduce non-value added calls, process time and
subsequent notices to improve NPS
Shorten time from “client
sent” to “in process” to
reduce status calls /
overall process time
Reduce non-value added
call volume by ~50%
Initiative to address
N1 N2 N4 N5 N6
Segment
and triage
demand
Prioritize
notice
workflow
Standard
work for
research
Upload/inte-
ractive notice
submission
Adapt to
SBS comm.
needs
Prevent subsequent
work and follow-up by
reducing end-to-end time
3
McKinsey & Company | 12
Metrics that align to the client priorities and tied to specific initiatives
Secure
Accurate
Fast
Trans-
parent
Customer Focus Cross-Functional Alignment Frontline Empowerment
Overall
Aspiration
▪ “35+ pts
NPS
▪ 50% CE /
EE SR
reduction
▪ Top quartile
associate
assessment
of client
service
Simple
to buy
Simple
to
integrate
Simple
to use
4
Metric TargetsPrimary initiatives
N2 Prioritize notice workflow
N4 Standard work for research
N1 Segment and triage demand
A3 Amendments common back-end
A2 Flex Op. model in Amendments
A1 Clients self-serve amendments
Standardize notes from researchN10
Simplify letter reason codesN9
N11 Ensure PoA / RAA / SUI
N5 Interactive notice submission
A5 Pay ahead P&I
A8 Template common amendments
N8 Automate notice validation
N7 Eliminate validation of 130k RAF
N6 Adapt to SBS comm. needs
Count of subs. notices - 0 -
Status calls Reduce 50%
End-to-end time < 5 days
Amendment backlog Eliminate
Amendment backlog Eliminate
Amendment backlog Eliminate
Count of subs. notices - 0 -
First pass yield 90%
Status calls Reduce 50%
First pass yield 90%
Status calls Reduce 50%
Total notice volume Reduce 10%1
Potential data breach - 0 -
% requiring validation - 0 -
“Sent” to “in progress” Immediate
Status calls2 Reduce 50%
N3 IVR to route without like call New notice calls Reduce 50%
1 Plug. To be replaced with % of notices caused by not paying forward P&I when caused by an amendment
2 Baseline to be established
McKinsey & Company | 13
The transformation also focuses on employee feedback and
engagement to test and generate improvement initiatives
Value streams
Value streams
Beliefs and behaviors
Management systems
Daily huddles
Coaching
Process confirmations
Visual performance
Skills matrix
Standard work
(Re)set
performance
targets
Identify
deviations
from target
or
standard
Define
problem
to be
solved
Identify root
cause of
deviations
Propose and
test
counter-
measure
Implement
and sustain
The
continuous
improvement
cycle
1
2
3
4
5
6
Problem solving
Client and associate
feedback surveys
Performance dialogues
4
McKinsey & Company | 14
This creates a new way of working that empowers employees to own
and improve the customers experience
Track daily
performance
against client
expectations
Daily huddle with performance
metrics yields transparency and
individual accountability for client
experience
Raise issues
affecting client
experience
and solve
Root cause problem solving sessions
enable researchers to solve and
implement improvements for client and
associate experience
Provide full
visibility of
client demand
Visual management tools have
enabled researchers to better manage
their desk according to client
expectations
Share best
practices with
other teams to
enhance
everyone’s
ability to serve
the client
Standard work allows researchers to
contribute to the performance of the
entire organization for much greater
client impact
4
McKinsey & Company | 15
Target
Engage Leaders Recognize and
Celebrate
Build a CX
Culture
Tell the CX Story
Awareness
What is our
CX
aspiration?
Understanding
Why is this
our top
priority?
Conviction
Why should I
care about
improving
CX?
Action
What should I
do to help?
Advocacy
How can I
enlist
others?
Employees
Leaders
The transformation hinges on change management and communications
to make the “change stick”
▪ Customer
interviews
▪ Frontline side-
by-sides
▪ Develop
mindsets and
behaviors shifts
for frontline
▪ Align incentives
to CX goals
▪ Leadership
blogs
▪ Newsletter
communi-
cations
▪ Frontline CX
videos
▪ Monthly CX
recognition
program
▪ Peer to peer
weekly
recognition
program
35+ ptsNPS scores across
business units
50%Reduction in client / EE
service requests
Top
quartileassociate assessment of
client service