Draft Super-PON Skeleton CFI -...
Transcript of Draft Super-PON Skeleton CFI -...
Super-PON CFI(skeleton version)
Scale Fully Passive Optical Access Networks to Longer Reaches and to a Significantly Higher Number of Subscribers
Claudio DeSantiLiang Du
Claudio DeSanti 2
CFI Objectives
• Measure the interest in studying Super-PON Ethernet architectures
• We do not need to:• Fully explore the problem• Debate strengths and weaknesses of solutions• Choose a solution• Create a PAR or 5 Criteria• Create a standard
• Anyone in the room may vote or speak
Claudio DeSanti 3
Agenda
• Overview• Market Need• Technical Feasibility• Why Now?• Straw Polls
Claudio DeSanti 4
Super-PON: A Different Way to Scale
• Ethernet traditionally scaled (in speed) in powers of 10• Then 802.3 recognized the need for different scaling factors for
different markets/applications• And 40Gb/s, 25Gb/s, 50Gb/s, 2.5Gb/s, 5Gb/s, 200Gb/s, 400Gb/s came out
• Super-PON intends to study PON scalability in different dimensions to address different/complementary markets/applications• Not in speed (802.3ca is already doing that),• But in reach (from ~10-20Km to ~40-50Km) …• …and in number of subscribers for fiber strain (from ~64 to ~1024)
• Optimize OSP resources utilization
Claudio DeSanti 5
Super-PON Goal
Up to 20Km
Up to 64
Up to 50Km
Up to 1024Passive Optical Network
From here… …to here
Claudio DeSanti 6
ONU1
ONU2
ONUn
CyclicA
WG
ONU1
ONU2
ONUn
ONU1
ONU2
ONUn
... m+q ...
P2P1
P2P2
P2Pq
10G-EPONl1OLT
10G-EPONl2OLT
10G-EPONlmOLT
…
……
BANDMUX
10Gl1Pt2Pt
10Gl2Pt2Pt
10GlqPt2Pt
…
……
booster
preamp
MUX
DMUX
Super-PON Architecture
CO
MUX/Amplifier
A: up to 40 Km B: up to 20 Km
A + B ≤ 50 Km
Claudio DeSanti 7
Super-PON Summary
• A DWDM system• Multiplexes multiple channels over a single feeder fiber• Separates the channels with a passive optical router (AWG) in the OSP• Supports more (customers) with less (fiber)
• An amplified system• Achieves long reach through amplification• Single amplifier for all channels to reduce the cost impact
• Supports different types of subscribers• Cost effective asymmetric ONUs for residential customers• Guaranteed performance symmetric ONUs for business customers
Claudio DeSanti 8
Agenda
• Overview• Market Need• Technical Feasibility• Why Now?• Straw Polls
Claudio DeSanti 9
Super-PON Applicability Summary
• Green field:
• Optical fiber plant build simplification (lower CAPEX and TTM)
• Support for both residential and point-to-point applications
• Brown field (optical fiber plant already in place):
• CO consolidation for CORD
• Re-use existing fiber plant and transform peripheral COs from
(managed) active sites to (unmanaged) holders of passive components
• Increased typical utilization of OLT ports
• Point-to-Point support for (5G) cellular and specific subscribers
• OSP expansion (i.e., additional OSP build to complement the existing OSP)
Claudio DeSanti 10
Use Cases
• New optical plants• Greenfield case
• Concentrate active equipment in less central offices• Reduce the amount of fiber needed to build an OSP
• New developments in US• Developing countries
• Smart cities• Support for 5G cellular• Extended EPON questions• CO consolidation for CORD deployments• Fiber shortage
Claudio DeSanti 11
Conventional PONCoverage
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
20 Km 50 Km
CO
CO
CO
CO
Claudio DeSanti 12
Super-PON Coverage
CentralizedCOCO
20 Km
• Larger serving area• Fewer number of COs• Smaller fiber bundles
50 Km
Claudio DeSanti 13
Use Case: Super-PON OSPConventional PON: 16 COs Super-PON: 3 COs
• Significantly smaller number of COs• Better fiber utilization
• Much less backbone and feeder fiber • Lower OSP building cost
Feeder fiber CAWG feeder fiberSplitter feeder fiber
10 Km 10 Km
Claudio DeSanti 14
Advantages
• Less fibers needed (DWDM)• Enables smaller/fewer cables
• From 432-fiber cables to 12/48-fiber cables
• Lower OSP building cost• Smaller cables can be longer and are easier to bend/handle• Allows use of micro-trenching and directional boring techniques• Easier to repair
• CO consolidation• The same number of feeder fibers can serve a much greater area• Less COs à less OPEX
Claudio DeSanti 15
About Trenching…Traditional Trenching Micro Trenching
Directional Boring
Claudio DeSanti 16
…and Repairs
CO
A 432-fiber cable:• Contains 36 ribbons of 12 fibers• ~10 min to splice a ribbon• ~6 hours total to splice a broken cable• Additional ~2 hours for cable manipulation• Average time to repair a cable damage: ~8 hours
6 feeder cables(432-fiber)
A 24-fiber cable:• ~40 mins total to splice a broken cable• Additional ~1 hour for cable manipulation• Average time to repair a cable damage: ~1 hour 40’
Claudio DeSanti 17
Use Case: US New Real Estate Developments(from Comcast)• New single family homes are being built now, after the last recession• This is a greenfield environment where Super-PON is quite interesting
Claudio DeSanti 18
Use Case: Developing Countries
• Developing countries are beginning to plan for fiber access networks• E.g., India
• These are greenfield scenarios• Super-PON is an interesting option
Claudio DeSanti 19
Use Case: Smart Cities
• Lot and lot of connectivity end-points needed to support the network of sensors and actuators at the basis of:• Smart lighting• Smart transportation• Smart infrastructure• Smart IoT devices• Smart data
• Need to do more (end-points) with less (fiber strains from the CO)• Example: Sidewalk Lab project in Toronto, Canada
Claudio DeSanti 20
... q ...
P2P 1
P2P 2
P2P q
Cycli
c AW
G
Cellular Tower
10Gl1Pt2Pt
10Gl2Pt2Pt
10GlqPt2Pt
…
MUX
DMUX
……
booster
preamp
BANDMUX
CO
Use Case: 5G Cellular Front-Haul Support
MUX/Amplifier
~1 Km
10 Km (5G)
~9 Km (5G)
• No 50Km reach (max 10Km for 5G delay requirements)
• Multiplex multiple channels (q) in the CAWG feeder fiber• Large deployment radius
• The CAWG serves up to q cellular towers• Small deployment radius
Claudio DeSanti 21
Example of 5G Support
• From here…• Each tower needs
its own fiber from the central office
CentralOffice
Claudio DeSanti 22
Example of 5G Support ...
Cyclic AWG
...
Cyclic AWG...
Cyclic A
WG...
Cyclic A
WG
...
Cyclic AWG
...
Cyclic AWG
...
Cyclic AWG ...
Cycli
c AW
GCentralOffice
1 Km
10 Km
• …to here• Leverage Super-PON
DWDM to carry multiple channels over one fiber
Claudio DeSanti 23
Extended EPON Questions
• How to leverage EPON architecture in rural areas• How to further increase subscriber density in CO• How to decrease the cost of connection per subscriber• How to serve more people at larger distance from CO using
IEEE 802.3 EPON equipment and avoid proprietary solutions
Claudio DeSanti 24
Use Case: CORD Support
aCO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
• A data-center in each CO is not cost effective• CO consolidation is needed
Claudio DeSanti 25
Consolidated CO
ConsolidatedCO
CORD is now cost effective
Claudio DeSanti 26
Feeder
CO
AWG
FeederCO
Use Case: Fiber Shortage ?~200HHP
Claudio DeSanti 27
Use Case: DOCSIS Node Splitting
DOCSIS node Feeder DN
DNDN
DN
FeederAWG
Claudio DeSanti 28
DN
DNDN
DN
Use Case: DOCSIS to FTTH
Feeder FeederAWG
AWG
Claudio DeSanti 29
Agenda
• Overview• Market Need• Technical Feasibility• Why Now?• Straw Polls
Claudio DeSanti 30
Topics
• Mostly a PMD-only project• Similar to 802.3bk• The only additional thing could be the possible 2.5G-EPON speed addition
• Low cost tunable lasers• DWDM (20 channels per fiber)• MUX/Amp• Athermal CAWG
Claudio DeSanti 31
PMAOLT
PMD
SIGNAL_DETECT Active
Optical
MUX/Amp
Passive
Cyclic
AWG
PMAOLT
PMD
SIGNAL_DETECT
ONU
PMDPMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
Passive
Optical
Splitter
ONU
PMDPMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
ONU
PMDPMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
Passive
Optical
Splitter
ONU
PMDPMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
MDI
MDI
…
……
…
SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
Fiber optic cabling, active optical MUX/Amp, passive cyclic AWG, and passive optical splitter (Channel)
Super-PON PMD – Residential
TP1 TP2 TP3 TP4
TP7 TP8TP9 TP10
TP11 TP12
TP5 TP6 Channel:
• Fiber Optic Cabling
• Optical MUX/Amp
• Cyclic AWG
• Optical Splitter
Claudio DeSanti 32
PMA Pt2PtPMD
SIGNAL_DETECT ActiveOptical
MUX/Amp
PassiveCyclicAWG
PMA Pt2PtPMD
SIGNAL_DETECT
P2PPMD PMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
P2PPMD PMA
SIGNAL_DETECT
Tx_Enable
MDI
MDI
…
…SMF cable
SMF cable
SMF cable
Fiber optic cabling, active optical MUX/Amp, and passive cyclic AWG (Channel)
Super-PON PMD – Point to Point
TP1 TP2 TP3 TP4
TP7 TP8TP9 TP10
TP11 TP12
TP5 TP6 Channel:• Fiber Optic Cabling• Optical MUX/Amp• Cyclic AWG
Claudio DeSanti 33
Speed Considerations• For residential support, an EML laser in the OLT and a DML laser in the ONU allow:
• 10Gb/s downstream – 2.5Gb/s upstream if the MUX/Amp does not contain dispersion compensation
• 25Gb/s downstream – 10Gb/s upstream if the MUX/Amp does contain dispersion compensation
• A 10Gb/s downstream – 2.5Gb/s upstream ONU is cost effective for residential users• Symmetric point-to-point links allow optimal support for higher speed business users
• Defining 2.5G-EPON upstream is a very doable effort• Just downclock 10G-EPON or 25G-EPON• Allow XGMII to have different RX_CLK and TX_CLK• Assign two bits in the REGISTER_REQ MPCPDU and in the DISCOVERY GATE MPCPDU for discovery• Specify the optical PMD parameters
• Enables to leverage for Ethernet the existing 2.5Gb/s GPON optical ecosystem
Claudio DeSanti 34
Agenda
• Overview• Market Need• Technical Feasibility• Why Now?• Straw Polls
Claudio DeSanti 35
Why Now?• The Software Defined Central Office is getting real• CORD is an example• Requires CO consolidation to be cost effective• Super-PON complements in the access network the consolidation made
possible in compute and services by CORD
• Super-PON point-to-point support helps (5G) cellular deployments• Super-PON is advantageous for new US residential developments• Developing countries are planning for greenfield fiber networks• Technology advancements made cooled lasers and tunable cooled
lasers more affordable than before• Enables narrow DWDM channel bands
Claudio DeSanti 36
Supporters
• …
Claudio DeSanti 37
Agenda
• Overview• Market Need• Technical Feasibility• Why Now?• Straw Polls
Claudio DeSanti 38
Straw Polls
• Should a study group be formed?• Would I participate in such a Study Group?• Would my company support participation in such a Study Group?
Claudio DeSanti 39
Thank you