NDMA Guidelines on the Management of Urban Flooding - Naresh Kadyan
Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
-
Upload
naresh-kadyan -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
1/34
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(Civil Writ Jurisdiction)
WRIT PETITION (Civil) No. OF 2010
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India)
IN THE MATTER OF::
1.
2.
Naresh KadyanS/o Sh. OmprakashKadyan,C-38, RoseApartment,Prashant Vihar,Sector-14, Rohini,
Delhi
Sukhdev Singh s/oR.S. Randhava, age47 years, H. No. 735,Sector22, NIIT,Distt. Faridabad,Haryana
Petitioner No.
1
Petitioner
No.2
//Versus//Union of India,
through the
Secretary,
Ministry of Home
New Delhi
Respondent
A public interest litigation under Article 32 of
the Constitution of India praying for saving the
custom of the Hindus and for issuance of a
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
2/34
writ, order or direction for the amendment of
THE FIRST SCHEDULE [ DEGREE OF PROHIBITED
RELATIONSHIP] of Hindu Marriage Act to add the
SAGOTRA (Clan) in the Degree of Prohibited
Relationship in the Schedule I and further for
appointment of the Commission of a Retired
Justice of the Honble High Court or Supreme
Court of India for the inquiry of Hindu Society in
the North Region, whether the marriages be
solemnized in the same GOTRA (Clan) or not
and also for appointment of a penal of
Specialist/ Competent Doctors to research
whether the inbreeding is dangers/harmful or
not to the society.
To,
The Honble the Chief Justice of India and His
Companion Justices of the Honble Supreme Court
of India.
The Humble petition
of the petitioners
above-named
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
3/34
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. This is a petition filed under Article 32 of the
Constitution of India wherein the petitioners
seek relief from this Honble Court for
ensuring saving the Custom right and
Religious Right of Hindus under Article of 25
and 25 (2) & 29 (1) of the Constitution of
India and not merely of a few individuals but
all of the Indian Hindus. This is the
Fundamental Right, provided under the
Article 25 (2) of the Constitution of India that:
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the
operation of any existing law or prevent the
State from making any law-
(a) Regulating or restricting any
economic, financial, political, or other secular
activity which may be associated with
religious practice.
And the Hindu marriage is a religious activity
under the Vedas and Shastras.
2. That culture, religion, tradition and customs
of all the communities are protected under
Article 29(1) of the Constitution of India,
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
4/34
being a fundamental right guaranteed to the
citizens of India. Article 29 is reproduced
below for kind perusal:-
(1) Any section of the citizens residing
in the territory of India or any part
thereof having a distinct language,
script or culture of its own shall have the
right to conserve the same.
The petitioners also seek protection
of the aforesaid right guaranteed
under the Constitution in order to
enforce the law regarding abuse and
misuse the custom, tradition and
culture of the Hindus.
(3). That Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage act
prescribes the conditions for a Hindu
Marriages:-
5. Conditions of a Hindu
Marriage.- A marriage may be
solemnized between two
Hindus, if the following
conditions are not fulfilled,
namely:
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
5/34
(i) neither party has a spouse
living at the time of the
marriage;
(ii) At the time of marriage,
neither party,-
(a) is incapable of giving a valid
consent to it in consequence
of unsoundness of mind; or
(b) though capable of giving a
valid consent has been
suffering from mental
disorder of such a kind or to
such an extent as to be unfit
for marriage and the
procreation of children or
(c) has been subject to
recurrent attacks of insanity
or epilepsy;
(iii) the bridegroom has
completed the age of
twenty-one years and the
bride the age of eighteen
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
6/34
years at the time of the
marriage;
(iv) the parties are not within the
degrees of prohibited
relationship unless the
custom or usage governing
each of them permits of a
marriage between the two:
(v) the parties are not spindas of
each other, unless the
custom or usage governing
each of them permits of a
marriage between the two.
(4) The only safeguards for protection of
violation of the marriages are provided
in sections 11 and 12 under the heads
Void and Voidable Marriages, as under:-
11. VOID MARRIAGES.- Any
marriage solemnized after the
commencement of this Act
shall be null and void and
may, on a petition presented
by either party thereto
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
7/34
against the other party be so
declared by a decree of nullity
if it contravenes any one of
the conditions specified in
clauses (i)(iv) and (v) of
Section 5.
12. VOIDABLE MARRIAGES.
(1) Any marriage solemnized,
whether before or after the
commencement of this Act,
shall be voidable and may be
annulled by a decree of nullity
of any of the following
grounds, namely:
(a) that the marriage has not been
consummated owing to the
impotence of the respondent; or
(b) that the marriage is in contravention
of the condition specified in Clause (ii)
of Section 5; or
(c) that the consent
Thus, the Act prescribes void and
voidable marriage, but such
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
8/34
marriages can only be declared by
way of decree on the petition
presented by either of the party
performing the marriages.
(5). The word Gotra has the same meaning as per
explanations of Spinda relationship as
mentioned in clause (f)(i) of Section 3 of
the Hindu Marriage Act as under:-
(f) (i) Sapinda relationship
with reference to any person
extends as far as the third
generation (inclusive) in the
line of ascent through the
mother, and the fifth
(inclusive) in the line of ascent
through the father, the line
being traced upwards in each
case from the person
concerned who is to be
counted as the first
generation;
(ii) two persons are said to be
sapindas of each other if one is a
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
9/34
lineal ascendant of the other within
the limits of spinda relationship, or
if they have a common lineal
ascendant who is within the limits
of spinda relationship with
reference to each of them;
(g) degrees of prohibited
relationship- two persons are said
to be within the degrees of
prohibited relationship-
(i) if one is a lineal ascendant of
the other; or
(ii) if one was the wife or husband
of a lineal ascendant or descendant
of the other; or
(iii) if one was the wife of the
brother or of the fathers or
mothers brother or of the
grandfathers or grandmothers
brother or the other; or
(iv) if two are brother and sister,
uncle and niece, aunt and nephew,
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
10/34
or children of brother and sister or
of two brothers or of two sisters.
Explanation:- For the purpose of
clauses (f) and(g), relationship
includes-
(i) relationship by half or uterine
blood as well as by full blood;
(ii) illegitimate blood
relationship as well as
legitimate;
(iii) relationship by adoption as
well as by blood
and all terms of relationship in
those clauses shall be constructed
accordingly.
7. That the Hindus religion is governed by
Vedas and Shastra and the all human
life is a Sanskar (ceremony). There are
16 Sanskar (ceremonies) in Hindus and
these are completed by a man in their
life such like birth, marriage and death
etc. The marriage is a ceremony and
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
11/34
also a religions activity, generally the
marriage is decided by parents with the
consents of the bride. & bridegroom.
Generally this marriage is decided in the
same caste, the caste is the part of
Hindu Religion and the Gotras (Clans)
are sub-parts of the caste. There are
the bar in custom that the marriage are
not allowed in Same Gotra (Clan) in
Hindus. Some caste in Hindus not to
marriage in 4 Gotra (Clan) of their near
relatives such like- (1) Self, (2) Mother
(3) Grand Mother (4) Maternal Grand
Mother,(for both bride and bridegroom)
according to their custom and usages
and some castes are avoid 2 or 3
Gotras (Clans) such like, self Gotra
(clan), mothers Gotra (clan) and Grand
Mothers gotra ( Clan).There is another
aspect of rule of law, which is of equal
significance.
8. That the present petition is an effort made on
behalf of the petitioners for the
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
12/34
enforcement of the fundamental rights
guaranteed in the Constitution of India
in exercise of the powers conferred on
this Honble Court for doing complete
justice in a cause. There is also a
customary rights and fundamentals
right aspect involved in the present
case.
9. That at the present day the source of Hindu
law are seven as According to Article 5
of Chapter 3 of Hindu Law namely- (i)
Sruti, (ii) Smriti (iii) Nibandhas or
Commentaries and Digest, (iv) Custom
or usage having the force of law, (v)
Justice, equity and good conscience, (vi)
Legal decision and (v) Legislation.
10. That the Custom or usage has the force
of law only if (i) it has been consciously
accepted as having the force of law; (ii)
it is ancient, (iii) certain, (iv) reasonable,
(v) not opposed to morality, public
policy or an express enactment, and (vi)
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
13/34
is established by clear and unambiguous
evidence.
11. That in the present case the marriage in
the same Gotra (clan ) is prohibited in
the Hindu religion and this custom of
prohibition of marriage in same Gotra
(clan) is full filled all the condition of
customs or usage and this Custom has
the force of law because (i) Prohibition
of Same Gotra (clan) has been
consciously accepted as having the
force of law because in the modern or
earlier society, there are no example of
the same Gotra (clan) marriage in India.
(ii) Prohibition of Same Gotra (clan)
marriage is ancient and there are no
example found of the same Gotra (clan)
marriage in the Indian Society from time
of Arayas or Vedic age.(iii) Prohibition of
Same Gotra (clan) marriage is certain
not flexible at any time in present and
past age.( iv) Prohibition of Same Gotra
(clan) marriage is reasonable and not
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
14/34
unreasonable and the society has been
accept the reasonability of this custom.
(v) the prohibition of same Gotra (clan)
marriage has not opposed to morality,
public policy or an express enactment
and also better for the heath of the
society and (vi)the prohibition of the
same Gotra (clan) marriage is
established by clear and unambiguous
evidence and for satisfaction and for
better evidence, the Honble Court may
appoint a Commission for enquiry
whether the Same Gotra Marriage is
prohibited or not in the society.
12. That the inbreeding is prohibited in the
Hindus religion and this prohibition is
also supported by the Science, Yoga
Guru Ramdeva, Satyarth Prakash
written by Swani Dayanand Sarswati.
13. Although severe inbreeding depression
in humans seems to be highly
uncommon and not widely known, there
have been several cases of apparent
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
15/34
forms of inbreeding depression in
human populations. As with animals,
this phenomenon tends to occur in
isolated, rural populations that are cut
off to some degree from other areas of
civilization.
A notable example is the Vadoma tribe
of western Zimbabwe, many of whom
carry the trait of having only two toes
due to a small gene pool.(attached as
Annexure P/2 .)
14. That the inbreeding is also prohibited in the
Animals as according to the Gazette
notification of MINISTRY OF
ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS , New
Delhi, dated 10th November, 2009
section 9 of this notification. (attached
here with as Annexure P/3 ) The
provision is reproduce as under:-
9. Acquisition and breeding of
animals
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadomahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadomahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwe -
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
16/34
(1) Every zoo shall endeavour
to keep and maintain animals
of various species in their
collection in such a sex ratio
that optimizes breeding and
helps in developing a self-
sustaining population of each
species.
(2) To safeguard against ill
effects of inbreeding on the
zoo population, the zoo shall
endeavour to introduce
unrelated animals to zoo stock
through exchange, loaning
and getting gifts of animals
from other zoos.
(3) No zoo shall acquire single
animal or genetically non-
viable number of animals
unless such acquisition is
necessary for pairing of single
animals or making the group
genetically/ biologically viable.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
17/34
(4) Every zoo shall endeavour
to acquire mates for single
and unpaired animals on
priority basis and in the event
of any zoo failing to find a
mate for single and unpaired
animal within a period of six
months, the unpaired or
single animal shall be
transferred or exchanged or
given on breeding loan to any
other zoo in accordance with
the norms specified by the
Central Zoo Authority in this
regard.
(5) For the purpose of
transportation of animals from
one place to another, the
standards specified in this
regard by the Central Zoo
Authority shall be complied
with.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
18/34
(6) The Central Zoo Authority
shall assign the responsibility
of conservation breeding of
the identified critically
endangered species to
identified zoos having
technical capabilities and
housing facilities, preferably
close to the distribution range
of the species and every zoo
shall help the identified zoos
in implementing the breeding
programme.
(7) The surplus animals from
the breeding population shall
be made available to the
contributing zoo for display
purposes on the basis of
quality of housing and
infrastructural facilities
available with the zoos.
(8) Every zoo shall, with a
view to prevent inbreeding
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
19/34
and the loss of
heterozygosity, the zoos shall
maintain the animal history
cards & stud and herd book
for the animals of endangered
species housed in the zoo and
put appropriate identification
marks and transfer or
exchange animals with other
zoos.
(9) Every zoo shall endeavour
to limit the number of animals of
each species within the limits set
by the animal collection plan of the
zoo by implementing appropriate
population control measures like
segregation of sexes, vasectomy,
tubectomy and implantation of
pellets etc., with due consideration
of the health and welfare of the
animals and interest of their long
term survival.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
20/34
(10) Every zoo shall take effective
measures to safeguard against
escape of the zoo animals from the
premises of the zoo and in the
event of any accidental escape,
immediate action shall be taken to
retrieve the escaped animals.
(11) No zoo shall release any
captive animal into the wild except
in accordance with the norms
specified by the Central Zoo
Authority in this regard.
(12) Every zoo shall ensure that no
hybridization of species or races of
same species takes place in the
zoo.
Hence, the inbreeding may also
prohibit in the human society or in
Hindus.
15. That the now days the same Gotra( clan) has
become the burning question of the
state for Haryana and NCR and the
some newly young married couples
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
21/34
have been murdered by their near
relatives in Jind, Jhajjar and other parts
of Haryana in 2009; because the same
Gotra marriage. The same Gotra( clan)
marriage is valid in the law and our
custom is prohibit the same Gotra( Clan)
marriage, hence the petitioners seeks
the amendment in the Hindu Marriage
Act for prevention of the Honour
Killings.
16. That the Honour Killing is the burning
question right now and many political
leaders have been muted in their views
and seeking the milk the sentiment
from honour killings.
17. That the need to amendment of the Hindu
Marriage Act through the medium of
public interest litigation invoking judicial
review may be frequent in India but is
unknown in other countries.
18. That the petitioner no. 1 are a social worker
and the president of OIPA, Haryana and
organizes many camps for social welfare
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
22/34
and Petitioner No. 2 is also a social
worker.
19. That this Honble Court inter-alia the
following amongst other:
G R O U N D S
(a) Because the saving of custom right of
Hindus in the present situation is not
merely of a few individuals and the
powers conferred on this Honble Court
by the Constitution of India are ample to
remedy the present situation and to
ensure enforcement of the concept of the
saving the Custom right and Religious
Right of Indian Citizens.
(b) Because the petitioners is entitled to
protection of their fundamental
guaranteed under Article 25, 25(2) and
29(1) of the Constitution for protection of
culture, religion, tradition and customs,
so as to enforce the law regarding abuse
and misuse the custom, tradition and
culture of the Hindu Community, by
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
23/34
contracting marriages which are
prohibited ones.
(c) Because the prohibition of Sagotra (clan)
marriage is the customary right of all the
Hindus.
(d) Because the Sagotra (Clan) marriage is
the custom and having the power equal
to law, hence the Honble Court may
amend the Fist schedule of the Hindu
Marriage Act.
(e) Because the inbreeding is harmful to the
society and in now age the environment
is polluted and the inbreeding decrease
the resistance power of the body.
(f) Because the inbreeding is prohibited in
the Animals but not prohibited in the
Human being as according to section 9
(sch-1) of the Ministry of Environment of
Forest.
(g) Because the Satyarth Prakash written by
the Swami Vivekanand also prohibit the
inbreeding and caution to us that the
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
24/34
inbreeding increases so many disease in
our body.
(h) Because the Yoga Guru Ramdev is also
prohibited the same Gotra (clan)
Marriage.
(i) Because the Hindus have no legal right to
save the same gotra( Clan) marriage or
this custom by the any law till date.
(j) Because it is the provided by the Indian
Constitution that the Honble Court may
give the direction to the Respondent for
ensuring the wh of utmost public
importance that this matter is examined
thoroughly by this Honble court to
ensure that all government agencies,
entrusted with the duty to discharge their
functions and obligations in accordance
with Law, do so, bearing in mind
constantly the concept of equality
enshrined in the Constitution of India and
the basic tenet of rule of law:Be you ever
so high, the law is above you.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
25/34
(k) Because there is a serious human rights
aspect involved in the present case
because the prevailing corruption in
higher public offices, if permitted to
continue unchecked, has ultimately the
deleterious effect of eroding the Indian
polity.
(l) Because the present matter is not only of
national interest but also bears an
international significance and a question
mark on the international Hindus
customs.
(m) Because the matter also involves the
alarming problem of the disease in the
near future from the inbreeding in human
life.
(n) Because it is approved by the scientist
that the inbreeding is the harmful to the
human being.
(o) Because in the agriculture the farmers
used the hybrid seeds for better
production and in human being how can
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
26/34
we give permission of inbreeding in the
science age.
20. That the Petitioners has not filed any other
petition before this Honble Court or any High
Court, seeking the same or similar relief.
21. That the Petitioners have no other equally
efficacious alternative remedy than to
approach this Honble Court by way of this
petition.
P R A Y E R
In the interest of justice and for the facts and
circumstances stated herein above it is most
respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may
graciously be pleased to:
(I) Issue an appropriate order or direction
directing the respondent for saving the
custom or usage of the Hindus and for the
amendment of THE FIRST SCHEDULE [ DEGREE
OF PROHIBITED RELATIONSHIP] of Hindu
Marriage Act and add the SAGOTRA (Clan) in
the Degree of Prohibited Relationship in the
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
27/34
Schedule I) so as to enforce the law, prohibiting
the marriages among girls and boys of the same
gotra (clan), and making a provision for
declaring as nonest or annulling such marriages
by any body other than parties to such
marriages, because the medical science has
proved time and again that marriages among
close relatives might lead to genetic disorders
in the offspring, and allowing such marriages to
exist would play havoc with the fabric of the
Society.
AND/OR
i. to issue any other appropriate writ,
order or direction which this
Honble Court may deem fit and
proper under the peculiar facts and
circumstances of the case, in
favour of the Hindus.
ii. Pass an order for appointment of a
Commission of retired Justice of the
Honble High Court or Supreme
Court India for the inquiry of
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
28/34
Hindus in the North Region of India
particularly in the State of
Haryana, Rajasthan, Delhi, Uttar
Pradesh, Bihar, Madhaya Pradesh,
Gujrat etc. whether the marriages
be solemnized in the same
GOTRA (Clan) or not in the Caste
of AHIR (YADAV) JAT, RAJPUT,
GURJAR, BRAHMIN, BANIYA, NAI
(SEN), BHUMIHAR, KAYASTH,
HARIJAN, DHOUBI, KURMI,etc. as
according to their customs and
usage and also for appointment of
a penal of Specialist/ Competent
Doctors to research whether the
inbreeding is dangers/harmful or
not to the society.
iii. Serving of advance notices of the
writ petition upon the respondent
may kindly be dispensed with.
iv. Writ petition of the petitioners may
kindly be allowed throughout with
costs, in the interest of justice.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
29/34
v. It is further prayed that during the
pendency of the petition in this
Honble Court, such interim orders
which this Honble Court may deem
fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances in the facts and
circumstances of the case may
kindly be granted;
Petitioners
Filed by
Drawn by: Rajender Yadav
(
)
Drawn on : Advocate for the
Petitioners
Filed on : -06-2010
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
30/34
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA
[CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION]
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. ___________of 2010
IN THE MATTER OF:
Sh. Naresh Kadyan & Anr.
Petitioners
//Versus//
Union of India
Respondent
AFFIDAVIT
I, Naresh Kadyan S/o Sh. Omprakash Kadyan, Age-
49 years, C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar,
Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi state on solemn
affirmation as follows:
1. That I am the petitioners in this above Writ
Petition am well conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the case and as such fully
competent to swear this affidavit.
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
31/34
2. That the contents of the accompanying Writ
petition containing pages ____ to _____ from
paras 1 to _______and Synopsis, List of dates at
pages A to _____ this affidavit have been drafted
under my instructions. The contents thereof
have been read and explained to me in
vernacular and I have fully understood thesame. The facts stated therein are true to the
best of my knowledge and based on record. The
same may be read as a part of this para.
3. That the Annexures P/1 to P/ are true copies of
their respective originals.
DEPONENT
I, the deponent above named do hereby verify
that the contents of the above affidavitare true tothe best of my knowledge and nothing is false and
nothing material has been concealed there from.
Verified at on this day
of June, 2010
DEPONENT
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
32/34
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
33/34
VAKALATNAMAIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
[CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION]WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. ___________of 2010
IN THE MATTER OF:Sh. Naresh Kadyan & Anr. Petitioners
//Versus//Union of India RespondentKnow All to whom these present shall come that I, NareshKadyan S/o Sh. Omprakash Kadyan, Age-49 years, C-38,Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi,
the petitioners No. 1 above named, do hereby appoint andretain
, ADVOCATE,to act and appear for me/us in the Petition and on my/ourbehalf to conduct and Prosecute the same and allproceedings that may be taken in respect of anyapplication connected with the same or any decree ororder passed therein, including proceeding in taxation andapplication for Review, to file and obtain return ofdocuments and to deposit and receive money on my/our
behalf in the above Petition/Appeal and to represent tome/us and to take all necessary steps on my/our behalf inthe above matter. I/We agree to ratify all acts done by theaforesaid Advocate in persuance of this authority. I/Wefurther authorise him to engage any other Advocate(s) onmy/our behalf or to enter into agreement or to agree forarbitration.
Date this the th day of June, 2010
Accepted
Petitioners(s)______________________________________________________ MEMO OF APPEARANCE
The RegistrarSupreme Court of IndiaNew Delhi.Sir,
Please enter my appearance for the abovementionedPetitioners(s) in the case.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully
NEW DELHI :Dated : ( )
Advocate for thePetitioners(s)
-
8/9/2019 Draft petition for Supreme Court of India : Amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Naresh Kadyan
34/34