Draft 11012011 ac_jcf

Click here to load reader

download Draft 11012011 ac_jcf

of 37

description

Presentation at The Charleston Conference by Meris Mandernach and Jody Condit Fagan.

Transcript of Draft 11012011 ac_jcf

  • 1. Discovery by the Numbers: An examination of the impact of a discovery tool through usage statisticsJody FaganDirector of Scholarly Content Systems, James MadisonUniversity, [email protected] MandernachCollection Management Librarian, James Madison University,[email protected]

2. What we will cover today General usage trends Discovery tool usage during the first year Changes in other database usage after discovery tool implementation Implications of usage statistics on librarycollection decisions One approach with measuring library discoverytool usage 3. Overview of James MadisonUniv. 19,000+ FTE Comprehensive university with undergrad focus part of statewide system 4. Definitions Library catalog = Innovative Interfaces Discovery Tool = EBSCO Discovery Service(EDS) Link Resolver = Serials Solutions Consortia = VIVA, Virtual Library of Virginia Databases Journals 5. JMU Libraries Home Page, 2009 6. JMU Libraries Home Page, 2009 7. JMU Research Databases Portal 8. JMU Subject Guides 9. JMU Subject Guides 10. So many choices! TOO MANY CHOICES!Choosing to use library resources isasking the students to do enough! 11. JMU Libraries Home Page, 2010 12. JMU Libraries Home Page, 2010 13. Whats included in JMUs EDSFull-text andEDS Foundation metadata from overIndex50 EBSCO databasesFull-text andOver 1,000,000 metadata from library catalog journal publishersrecords and 97,000 and other partnersserials records (Elsevier, JSTOR) 14. Whats NOT included in JMUsEDSFull-text and Full-text and metadata from overNumerous othermetadata from over 50 ProQuest/CSA subject-specific50 Gale databasesdatabases resourcesLess than of JMU database subscriptions are included in EDS...but some databases journals are covered in EDS Foundation Index 15. Show me the numbers! 16. Limitations of our study Local data (circulation) confounded by changes inthe way we count things Only one year of EDS data Confounded by inconsistent vendor data andreports EBSCO COUNTER Really? ProQuest / CSA platform change Cannot assign causation to correlations 17. Visits to Physical Libraries and WebSite Gate counts: visitors to1000000buildings Carrier Library 800000(original building) 600000 East Campus 400000Library (new building) 2000000FY2007FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011 Library home page visits12000001000000 800000 600000 400000 2000000 18. Circulation and Catalog use, FY2007-FY2011 Circulations, excluding e- Books 250000Circulations 200000 150000 100000500000 Library Catalog SearchesFY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11600000500000 Searches 400000300000 Keyword200000 Author Index 100000 Subject Index 0 Title Index FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 19. Collection use and ILL requests Circulations, excluding e- Books 250000Circulations 200000 150000 100000500000FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 ILL Borrowing requests10000 8000 6000 Articles Loans 4000 20000FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 20. First year with EDS: Sessions andSearches, July 2010 June 2011 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 Sessions 20000 Searches 10000 0 21. First year with EDS: Sessions and Searches, July 2010 June 2011EDS 200,000 sessions 420,000+ searchesLEO Library Catalog (sessions unknown) 490,000+ searches 22. JMU Libraries First year with EDS:Sessions and Full-Text / Custom Links350003000025000200001500010000 50000 23. Full-text plus custom link use per sessionin EBSCO databases, FY20111.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20 24. Full-text requests through linkresolver, FY07-FY11400000350000300000250000200000150000100000 50000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 25. Full text requests, FY2007 - FY2011 + EDS full-text downloads for FY2011400000350000300000Full-text250000downloads(Direct), EDS200000Full-text150000requests, linkresolver100000 50000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 26. EBSCO databases link resolver hits and full-text downloads300000250000 Full-text downloads from200000 EDS150000 Full-text downloads from EBSCO (not including100000 link resolver) Link Resolver hits on 50000 EBSCO databases 0 FY10 FY11 27. Percent change in general databasesearches, FY2010-FY2011 Academic Search Lexis NexisOmnifile Full TextComplete (EBSCO)Academic Mega (WilsonWeb)0%-5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% -45% -50% 28. Percent change in EBSCO subject-specific database searches, FY2010-FY2011 Communication & Mass Media Business Source CompleteCINAHL SPORTDiscusComplete10% 5% 0% -5%-10%-15%-20%-25% 29. Percent change in non-EBSCOsubject-specific databases, FY2010-FY2011450%400%350%300%250%200%150%100% 50%0%-50% -100% 30. Correlations, not causations:summary Use of JMU Libraries (buildings and web site) isup Catalog searching and circulation is down Discovery searching is up, and rivaling thecatalog Total full-text accesses Changing patterns from link resolver to direct fulltext access? Increase in total full-text downloads? Some EBSCO subject-specific databases are decreasing in use But have better full-text plus custom link ratio than 31. So what?!? Cancel everything because you have a discoverytool? Duplicative subject content within discovery Use of XYZ database dropped last year.. Give itthe axe! 32. Check multiple years of dataScopus Searches and Sessions FY2007-FY2011 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000Searche 25000s 20000 15000 100005000 0 200720082009 20102011 33. Cautions of working with usage data Identify research questions Never work alone Look at many years of data and multiple sources Remember correlation does not imply causation 34. Cautions of working with usage data Identify research questions Never work alone Look at many years of data and multiple sources Remember correlation does not imply causationWhy use data at all? Use data to plan strategically Systems decisions Organizational common ground Resource allocation 35. Future research Impact on physical collection use: requires study Get a big picture perspective of full text usage Investigate full text + custom link ratio (is this auseful metric?) Are users discovering more full text or is therejust more full text to be discovered? Instruction impact on usage 36. Questions? Jody Fagan Director of Scholarly Content Systems, James Madison University, [email protected] Meris Mandernach Collection Management Librarian, James Madison University, [email protected]