Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of...

31
Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of “student satisfaction”? Geoff Sharrock [email protected]

description

Dr. Geoff Sharrock, Senior Lecturer, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne delivered this presentation at the inaugural Student Experience conference in 2013. A quality student experience is a critical component when examining the attributes a university offers a prospective student. It is equally as important sector wide, in producing highly educated, well rounded and qualified individuals that make up the future of the national workforce. As a result, it is crucial for universities to assess not only ways they can improve their institution’s student experience but ways they can differentiation themselves in an increasingly competitive marketplace. Factors that holistically impact student experience include the interconnections between student services, methods of course delivery and the use of technology along with all that this entails. The Inaugural Student Experience Conference will endeavour to address these complex and challenging issues within the context of the evolving Higher Education sector. For more information about the event, please visit the conference website http://www.informa.com.au/studentexperienceconference

Transcript of Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of...

Page 1: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Students as customers:

how far do we go

in the name of “student satisfaction”?

Geoff Sharrock

[email protected]

Page 2: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

• If students are customers what business are we in?

• Student experience spectrum: beyond “customers”

• Quality assurance and “customer/client focus”

• Functions of a university: what are we managing?

– social institution

– bureaucratic authority

– Business enterprise

• Conclusion: how far do we go to “satisfy” them?

Outline of presentation

Page 3: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

“Satisfaction” as a business principle

“The customer

is always

right”

Harry Gordon

Selfridge

Mr Selfridge 60

Page 4: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Allergic reactions to the “Uni-as-business”

“Students aren’t customers!

We can’t just give them what

they want.

They don’t yet know enough to judge

...why pander to their demands?

You’re a middle manager with a

marketing brief:

how can I make this university more

like a shopping mall?”

Page 5: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

“In the past, being a professional…presumed a calling – a vocation – and a dedication to service…

A physician (one who healed) served the needs of a patient (one who suffered).

A professor (one who professed) served the needs of a student (one who studied).

Today we question whether concepts such as “student” and “teacher” are appropriate...

Do we have students, or are they customers, clients, stakeholders, constituents, or (indeed) products?

Do faculty members profess, or do they manage, coordinate, or facilitate learning?”

Crisis of identity for scholars?

Page 7: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Student experience spectrum

Framing of

“students”

Analogies and examples of

“quality” or “professional service”

As (simple)

consumers

(e.g. where &

what to eat?)

• “Know what they want” (but from a menu)

• Choose on the spot: “a big Mac with fries”

• Are “always right”

As (informed)

customers

(e.g. which

course to

study?)

• Sort of know what they need: “a PC, not a Mac”

• May shop around & take time to decide

• Need advice on the options (costs? benefits?)

• Expect “satisfaction” via informed choices

(no false promises, no hidden costs)

Page 8: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Student experience spectrum

Framing of

“students”

Analogies and examples of

“quality” or “professional service”

As (complex)

clients with

undefined

needs

(in need of

diagnosis,

guidance,

supervision)

• May not know what they need: “to see a doctor”

• Need expert advice on “needs” & “options”

• May need a tailored or non-standard solution

• May play a part in co-producing the solution:

“Stop eating fast food & playing computer games”

• “Satisfaction” turns on how “needs” & “options”

are framed: is the client’s best interest served?

Page 9: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Student experience spectrum

Framing of

“students”

Analogies and examples of

“quality” or “professional service”

As citizens/

constituents

(entitled to

access, support,

fair treatment)

• Have “membership” rights to services:

“to borrow books from the university library”

“to get helpful, impartial advice & support”

As subjects

(“the student is

often wrong”)

• Have “member” obligations they must meet:

“to do the reading, attend classes”

“to submit work on time, meet standards”

“to return books when due, or pay a fine”

Page 10: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Student experience spectrum

Framing of

“students”

Analogies and examples of

“quality” or “professional service”

As graduates:

“products”

for a

“virtual client”

(stakeholders

beyond the

student)

• Must have earned degree by mastering skills

& knowledge, acquiring capabilities & attributes

• System integrity: third parties are protected

(other students, employers, clients, society)

Page 11: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Student experience spectrum

Framing of

“students”

Analogies and examples of

“quality” or “professional service”

As partners:

(postgrads,

future work

colleagues)

• Identified as future scholars: “one of us”

• Collaborate on projects as junior colleagues

• Risk of exploitation (professors may become

de facto “clients” of under-paid students)

Page 12: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

• A “public-spirited” social institution: engaged in inquiry, discovery, critique, debate, innovation

• A “bureaucratic” credentialling authority: certifying acquisition of learning, readiness for responsibility

• A “business” enterprise: offering products & services, responding to client needs & market demand, reliant on a cost/revenue business model.

Functions of the university

Page 13: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Role of university & role of student

Function of

the institution

Analogies for the

student relationship

Business

enterprise

Consumers

Customers

Clients

Credentialling

authority

Subjects

Products

Social

institution

Citizens

Partners

Page 14: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Example:

Student experience of Grad Cert in University Management

Students as “customers” + “clients” + “citizens” + “subjects”

(but not “consumers” or “products” or “partners”)

Process:

A live group survey (small class)

Data is collected, replayed and discussed in class

mid-semester, and end-of-semester

See Sharrock, (2012). “Quality in teaching and learning: one path to improvement.” Australian Universities Review, vol 54 no 2

Quality assurance: “customer/client focus”

Page 15: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 16: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 17: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 18: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 19: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 20: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 21: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 22: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 23: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 24: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 25: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 26: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 27: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 28: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 29: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Questions?

QA via live group student feedback

Page 30: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

“All the way” to support students so they can:

– make well-informed & independent choices

– make good use of facilities & services

– be engaged & use their time well

– achieve results & benefit fully from study.

But, some professional “no-go” zones:

– no special treatment: students are “equally special”

– upholding standards: students aren’t “always right”

How far do we go to “satisfy” students?

Mr Selfridge, 30

Page 31: Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of ‘student satisfaction’?

Thank you!

Questions?