Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of...
-
Upload
informa-australia -
Category
Education
-
view
379 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Dr Geoff Sharrock, University of Melbourne: Students as customers: how far do we go in the name of...
Students as customers:
how far do we go
in the name of “student satisfaction”?
Geoff Sharrock
• If students are customers what business are we in?
• Student experience spectrum: beyond “customers”
• Quality assurance and “customer/client focus”
• Functions of a university: what are we managing?
– social institution
– bureaucratic authority
– Business enterprise
• Conclusion: how far do we go to “satisfy” them?
Outline of presentation
“Satisfaction” as a business principle
“The customer
is always
right”
Harry Gordon
Selfridge
Mr Selfridge 60
Allergic reactions to the “Uni-as-business”
“Students aren’t customers!
We can’t just give them what
they want.
They don’t yet know enough to judge
...why pander to their demands?
You’re a middle manager with a
marketing brief:
how can I make this university more
like a shopping mall?”
“In the past, being a professional…presumed a calling – a vocation – and a dedication to service…
A physician (one who healed) served the needs of a patient (one who suffered).
A professor (one who professed) served the needs of a student (one who studied).
Today we question whether concepts such as “student” and “teacher” are appropriate...
Do we have students, or are they customers, clients, stakeholders, constituents, or (indeed) products?
Do faculty members profess, or do they manage, coordinate, or facilitate learning?”
Crisis of identity for scholars?
Student experience: are they well served?
Love etc 120
Student experience spectrum
Framing of
“students”
Analogies and examples of
“quality” or “professional service”
As (simple)
consumers
(e.g. where &
what to eat?)
• “Know what they want” (but from a menu)
• Choose on the spot: “a big Mac with fries”
• Are “always right”
As (informed)
customers
(e.g. which
course to
study?)
• Sort of know what they need: “a PC, not a Mac”
• May shop around & take time to decide
• Need advice on the options (costs? benefits?)
• Expect “satisfaction” via informed choices
(no false promises, no hidden costs)
Student experience spectrum
Framing of
“students”
Analogies and examples of
“quality” or “professional service”
As (complex)
clients with
undefined
needs
(in need of
diagnosis,
guidance,
supervision)
• May not know what they need: “to see a doctor”
• Need expert advice on “needs” & “options”
• May need a tailored or non-standard solution
• May play a part in co-producing the solution:
“Stop eating fast food & playing computer games”
• “Satisfaction” turns on how “needs” & “options”
are framed: is the client’s best interest served?
Student experience spectrum
Framing of
“students”
Analogies and examples of
“quality” or “professional service”
As citizens/
constituents
(entitled to
access, support,
fair treatment)
• Have “membership” rights to services:
“to borrow books from the university library”
“to get helpful, impartial advice & support”
As subjects
(“the student is
often wrong”)
• Have “member” obligations they must meet:
“to do the reading, attend classes”
“to submit work on time, meet standards”
“to return books when due, or pay a fine”
Student experience spectrum
Framing of
“students”
Analogies and examples of
“quality” or “professional service”
As graduates:
“products”
for a
“virtual client”
(stakeholders
beyond the
student)
• Must have earned degree by mastering skills
& knowledge, acquiring capabilities & attributes
• System integrity: third parties are protected
(other students, employers, clients, society)
Student experience spectrum
Framing of
“students”
Analogies and examples of
“quality” or “professional service”
As partners:
(postgrads,
future work
colleagues)
• Identified as future scholars: “one of us”
• Collaborate on projects as junior colleagues
• Risk of exploitation (professors may become
de facto “clients” of under-paid students)
• A “public-spirited” social institution: engaged in inquiry, discovery, critique, debate, innovation
• A “bureaucratic” credentialling authority: certifying acquisition of learning, readiness for responsibility
• A “business” enterprise: offering products & services, responding to client needs & market demand, reliant on a cost/revenue business model.
Functions of the university
Role of university & role of student
Function of
the institution
Analogies for the
student relationship
Business
enterprise
Consumers
Customers
Clients
Credentialling
authority
Subjects
Products
Social
institution
Citizens
Partners
Example:
Student experience of Grad Cert in University Management
Students as “customers” + “clients” + “citizens” + “subjects”
(but not “consumers” or “products” or “partners”)
Process:
A live group survey (small class)
Data is collected, replayed and discussed in class
mid-semester, and end-of-semester
See Sharrock, (2012). “Quality in teaching and learning: one path to improvement.” Australian Universities Review, vol 54 no 2
Quality assurance: “customer/client focus”
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
Questions?
QA via live group student feedback
“All the way” to support students so they can:
– make well-informed & independent choices
– make good use of facilities & services
– be engaged & use their time well
– achieve results & benefit fully from study.
But, some professional “no-go” zones:
– no special treatment: students are “equally special”
– upholding standards: students aren’t “always right”
How far do we go to “satisfy” students?
Mr Selfridge, 30
Thank you!
Questions?