Dr Frank Dennis Associate - Royal Society of Chemistry · OBJECTIVES Provision of basic information...

28
CONTAMINANT HYDROGEOLOGY AT NUCLEAR SITES Dr Frank Dennis Associate

Transcript of Dr Frank Dennis Associate - Royal Society of Chemistry · OBJECTIVES Provision of basic information...

CONTAMINANT HYDROGEOLOGY AT NUCLEAR SITES

Dr Frank DennisAssociate

CONTENTS

Introduction

Objectives

Background

Regulatory setting

A bit about contaminants

A bit about their management/treatment

Summary

INTRODUCTION

International consulting engineers specialising in ground engineering and environmental science

Established in 1960 in Canada, offices in the UK since 1973

Offices in 85 countries, completed projects in more than 120 countries

6,500 staff worldwide, around 250 staff in the UK

Key environmental consultant to UK nuclear industry

OBJECTIVES

Provision of basic information regarding

contaminant hydrogeology at nuclear sites

Encourage thought on the issues associated

with groundwater contaminant management

BACKGROUND – TYPES OF OPERATIONS

Operating (and planned) nuclear power

e.g. BE/EdF; some Magnox

Decommissioning sites

Old UKAEA and BNFL sites

Some private sites (e.g. GE Healthcare sites)

MoD sites

e.g. AWE, Devonport, etc

Waste/repository programmes

Surface/near surface LLW

Deep ILW

BACKGROUND - NUCLEAR SITE LOCATION

BACKGROUND – GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT

CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

Radionuclides Fingerprint generally unique at each site

• Dounreay – 137Cs; 90Sr

• Sellafield - 90Sr; 137Cs; 99Tc, 3H

• Aldermaston – long-lived α; 3H

“Conventional” Contaminants More common than you might think

• DNAPL

• LNAPL

• Acid

• Heavy Metals

• TNT

COC’s EXAMPLE 1

Western Storage Area, Harwell

25 unlined chemical waste (solvent) pits excavated into Chalk

Detection of significant off-site contamination in 1980’s

Contaminant plume extends many km

Containment plant operational 1993

Replacement plant operational 2007

5.75 tons of contaminant removed from groundwater since 1993

COC’s EXAMPLE 2

Shaft, Dounreay

ILW disposal in 65m deep, 4m diameter shaft

Inventory poorly understood but dominant CoC’s include 137Cs; 90Sr

Migration from unlined shaft into host rock and ultimately to sea

Extensive programme to hydraulically isolate shaft complete

COC’s EXAMPLE 3

Anonymous site

Surface radionuclide contamination of concrete

Scabbling to remove concrete

Cleaned concrete crushed and used for landscaping site

Hydrocarbons picked up in groundwater

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT - REGULATORS

Understand the law and the regulatory environment

Confusing regulatory regime Environment Agency

Health and Safety Executive

Local Authority

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT - STAKEHOLDERS

Understand the Stakeholder’s requirement

Engage with Stakeholders early

Be prepared to impress Stakeholders with solutions and not just present them with problems

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT - STAKEHOLDERS

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT

Understand the nature of the problem and act immediately

Phase the investigations to continually:

Reduce uncertainty

Refine the conceptual model

Refine the risk assessment

Define the best remedial solution

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT - REMEDIATION

Remediation techniques

Natural attenuation

Pump and treat

Permeable reactive barriers

Cut off walls

REMEDIATION - PUMP AND TREAT SYSTEMS

REMEDIATION - PUMP AND TREAT SYSTEMS

TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED DISCHARGES

Temporary groundwater treatment plant

• Floculation and settlement

• Granular activated carbon

• Air stripping

• Ion exchange

PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS (PRBs)

Relatively new technology in UK, lack of track record over full design life

Another slow process – design life measured in decades

Design can be complex, no active pumping so understanding of existing groundwater conditions are fundamental

Not maintenance free- fouling/encrustation reactors- exhaustion of treatment media

Several processes covered by patents

IN-GROUND PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS (PRBS)

PRB EXAMPLE – NORTHWEST ENGLAND

Funnel and gate system

slurry wall barrier

mechanical in ground gate constructed of steel containing iron filings (“zero valent iron”)

iron filings reacting with Chlorinated Solvents

Source: Arup

Source:Envirometal Technologies Inc.

PRB EXAMPLE – NORTHWEST ENGLAND

Source:Arup

Reactor vessel ready for installation

Reactor vessels in place in PRB gate

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM GROUNDWATER CONTROL

Impact 1: Abstraction- e.g. impact on water sources

Impact 2: Pathways for groundwater flow- e.g. increased risk of aquifer pollution

Impact 3: Barriers to groundwater flow- e.g. changes in groundwater level

Impact 4: Discharges to groundwater- e.g. risk of fuel spills, etc

Impact 5: Discharge to surface water- e.g. risk of pollution of surface waters

NEW BUILD

Risk from contaminants already on site

Risk of contamination from near surface

construction activity

Risk from off-site sources

NEW BUILD - IMPACTS OF GROUNDWATER CONTROL

Effect on Aquifer Quality

Pumping from dewatering systems changes natural hydraulic gradients and velocities

This can cause the migration of plumes of polluted water associated with adjacent contaminated sites

SUMMARY

Complicated regulatory regimeCoC’s are not limited to

radionuclidesVariety of treatment options

availableFully understand the contaminant

system and act