Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
-
Upload
anonymous-sewu7e6 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 1/120
HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELORS’ ROLES AS PERCEIVED BY HIGH SCHOOL
PRINCIPALS AND COUNSELORS IN TEXAS
A Dissertation
by
DESIREE ADAIR SKINNER
Submitted to the Whitlowe R. Green College of Education
Prairie View A&M University
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
March 2010
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 2/120
HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELORS’ ROLES AS PERCEIVED BY HIGH SCHOOL
PRINCIPALS AND COUNSELORS IN TEXAS
A Dissertation
by
DESIREE ADAIR SKINNER
Approved as the style and content by:
___________________________________________
William Allan Kritsonis, Ph.D.
(Dissertation Chair)
Edward Mason, Ph.D. Tyrone Tanner, Ed.D.(Member) (Member)
___________________________________________
Camille Gibson, Ph.D.(Member)
Lucian Yates, Ph.D. William Parker, Ed.D.
(Dean, Whitlowe R. Green (Dean, Graduate School)College of Education)
March 2010
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 3/120
Abstract
High School Counselors’ Role as Perceived by High School Principals and Counselors
in Texas
(May 2010)
Desiree Adair Skinner: B.S., University of Arkansas
M.Ed., Sam Houston State University
M.A., Sam Houston State University
Chair of Advisory Committee: William Allan Kritsonis, Ph.D.
Defining the job of the high school counselor is an elusive task (Ribak-
Rosenthal, 1994) and is most often done by the high school principal. Additionally, role
conflicts ensue because the counselor’s role is not always clearly defined. Through a
more collaborative relationship, principals and counselors can create a more relevant and
comprehensive school guidance and counseling program and a more defined role for the
high school counselor.
The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of high school
principals and high school counselors about the role of high school counselors.
The following questions guided the study:
1. Is there a significant correlation between high school counselors’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 4/120
2. Is there a significant correlation between high school principals’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
3. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
4. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
5. What are the most important functions of the high school counselor as perceived
by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standards?
This quantitative study gathered information through a survey. The modified
“Counselor Function Inventory” (2008) is a 42-item instrument that was distributed to
the head principal and lead counselor at all 5A high schools in Texas; the University
Interscholastic League (UIL) has determined 241 such schools. The data were analyzed
using bivariate correlations using Pearson r and independent sample t-tests.
The significance of the study was to indicate the agreement or disagreement,
between high school principals and counselors on the functions that counselors should
perform as they relate to the national standards. The findings revealed that counselors
and principals have little agreement between and among themselves about what
counselors do and should do. Counselors and principals do not agree about the functions
that are actually being performed. However, counselors agree amongst themselves about
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 5/120
what counselors should do. Counselors and principals need to revisit what counselors are
doing and should be doing to come to an understanding of perceptions and expectations.
School leaders may benefit from this knowledge in terms of utilizing the school
counselor more effectively.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 6/120
Dedication
This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my late dad, Robert Owen. Although
he was only in my life for 11 short years, he instilled in me the value of hard work and
determination, along with the ability to dream.
To my second family, the Rabb’s, thank you for taking me into your home and
family. I am forever grateful that you would not allow me to become a victim of my
circumstances.
To my amazing husband, Mike Skinner, your love and support got me through
this crazy process. Thank you for keeping the pressure on so I would finish.
To my beautiful daughter, Rowen, for all the laughs and smiles. I’m so glad
you’re here…and a good sleeper!
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 7/120
Acknowledgements
I want to thank God for putting me in this circumstance at this time. Without
Him none of this would have been possible.
I want to thank my committee for all their support and encouragement. I want to
thank Dr. William Allan Kritsonis for serving as my dissertation chair. I truly appreciate
you never accepting anything less than the best from me.
I want to thank all of my friends and family for their prayers, encouragement,
and support. I want to give a special “thank you” to my very good friends Heidi Sauer
and Justin Estes for making me a better writer. I appreciate all the time you put in for
editing. To Eric Oslund for helping me get past the statistical hump. You’re the best
tutor money could buy. I appreciate and love Rhodena and Margaret for pushing me
forward, especially after I had my baby. To Cohort III, thank you for the friendship!
What a great experience, and the lessons I’ve learned from all of you are invaluable.
Last, but definitely not least, I want to thank my husband, Mike Skinner. Thanks
for all the love and prayers that got me to the finish line.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 8/120
Table of Contents
LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................11
CHAPTER I........................................................................................................................1
Background of the Problem............................................................................................1
Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................................4
Statement of the Problem...............................................................................................4
Purpose of the Study.......................................................................................................5
Research Questions........................................................................................................6
Hypotheses.....................................................................................................................6
Conceptual Framework..................................................................................................7
Definition of Terms........................................................................................................9
Summary.......................................................................................................................10
Chapter II..........................................................................................................................11
History of Counseling ....................................................................................................... 11
History of Counseling...................................................................................................11
The Role of School Counselor ..........................................................................................15
The Role of School Counselor.....................................................................................15
Perceptions of the School Counselors’ Role................................................................16
The Role Conflict of the School Counselor.................................................................31
Accountability of the Professional School Counselor..................................................34
Readiness......................................................................................................................42
Previous Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) Results ....................................................45
Previous Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) Results................................................45
Models of School Counseling Programs .......................................................................... 46
Models of School Counseling Programs......................................................................46
Research Questions......................................................................................................48
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 9/120
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 49
Summary.......................................................................................................................49
Chapter III.........................................................................................................................51
METHOD.........................................................................................................................51Overview ...........................................................................................................................51
Overview......................................................................................................................51
Quantitative Questions..............................................................................................51
Participants .......................................................................................................................52
Participants...................................................................................................................52
Sample..........................................................................................................................53
Procedure .......................................................................................................................... 53
Procedure......................................................................................................................53
Instrument.....................................................................................................................54
Original Counselor Function Inventory (CFI)..............................................................54
VALIDITY .............................................................................................................. 55
RELIABILITY .........................................................................................................55
Reliability.................................................................................................................55
Modifications ............................................................................................................ 56Modifications............................................................................................................56
Research Design...........................................................................................................57
Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 58
Limitations....................................................................................................................58
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 58
Summary.......................................................................................................................58
Chapter IV........................................................................................................................60FINDINGS........................................................................................................................60
Overview......................................................................................................................60
Research Question 1.....................................................................................................61
Counselors’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards*=significance ...........................................................................................................62
Research Question 2.....................................................................................................64
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 10/120
Principals’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards
*=significance ...........................................................................................................65Research Question 3.....................................................................................................68
Research Question 4.....................................................................................................69
Research Question 5.....................................................................................................71
The most important functions based on the ASCA standards
*=significance ...........................................................................................................72
Summary.......................................................................................................................73
CHAPTER V....................................................................................................................74
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................74
Introduction..................................................................................................................74
Summary of Research...................................................................................................74
Summary of Findings...................................................................................................74
Implications..................................................................................................................79
Applications..................................................................................................................81
Conclusions..................................................................................................................82
Recommendations for Future Research........................................................................82
References.........................................................................................................................83
APPENDIXES..................................................................................................................94
APPENDIX A...................................................................................................................94Original \“Counselor Function Inventory\........................................................................94
APPENDIX B...................................................................................................................97
MODIFIED \“COUNSELOR FUNCTION INVENTORY\............................................97
APPENDIX C.................................................................................................................101PRINCIPAL/COUNSELOR INSTRUCTION LETTER...........................................101
appendix d.......................................................................................................................102Consent Form.............................................................................................................102
Background Information ......................................................................................... 102Risks and Benefits of being in the Study ................................................................103
College Station, TX 77845 ............................................................................................. 104
APPENDIX E.................................................................................................................105
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 11/120
IRB APPROVAL.......................................................................................................105
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................11
CHAPTER I........................................................................................................................1Background of the Problem............................................................................................1
Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................................4
Statement of the Problem...............................................................................................4
Purpose of the Study.......................................................................................................5
Research Questions........................................................................................................6
Hypotheses.....................................................................................................................6
Conceptual Framework..................................................................................................7
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 12/120
Definition of Terms........................................................................................................9
Summary.......................................................................................................................10
Chapter II..........................................................................................................................11History of Counseling ....................................................................................................... 11
History of Counseling...................................................................................................11
The Role of School Counselor ..........................................................................................15
The Role of School Counselor.....................................................................................15
Perceptions of the School Counselors’ Role................................................................16
The Role Conflict of the School Counselor.................................................................31
Accountability of the Professional School Counselor..................................................34
Readiness......................................................................................................................42
Previous Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) Results ....................................................45
Previous Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) Results................................................45
Models of School Counseling Programs .......................................................................... 46
Models of School Counseling Programs......................................................................46
Research Questions......................................................................................................48
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 49Summary.......................................................................................................................49
Chapter III.........................................................................................................................51METHOD.........................................................................................................................51
Overview ...........................................................................................................................51
Overview......................................................................................................................51
Quantitative Questions..............................................................................................51
Participants .......................................................................................................................52
Participants...................................................................................................................52
Sample..........................................................................................................................53
Procedure .......................................................................................................................... 53
Procedure......................................................................................................................53
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 13/120
Instrument.....................................................................................................................54
Original Counselor Function Inventory (CFI)..............................................................54
VALIDITY .............................................................................................................. 55RELIABILITY .........................................................................................................55
Reliability.................................................................................................................55
Modifications ............................................................................................................ 56Modifications............................................................................................................56
Research Design...........................................................................................................57
Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 58Limitations....................................................................................................................58
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 58
Summary.......................................................................................................................58
Chapter IV........................................................................................................................60FINDINGS........................................................................................................................60
Overview......................................................................................................................60
Research Question 1.....................................................................................................61
Counselors’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards
*=significance ...........................................................................................................62Research Question 2.....................................................................................................64
Principals’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards*=significance ...........................................................................................................65
Research Question 3.....................................................................................................68
Research Question 4.....................................................................................................69
Research Question 5.....................................................................................................71
The most important functions based on the ASCA standards
*=significance ...........................................................................................................72
Summary.......................................................................................................................73
CHAPTER V....................................................................................................................74
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................74Introduction..................................................................................................................74
Summary of Research...................................................................................................74
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 14/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 15/120
CHAPTER I
Background of the Problem
“What is your job?” For many professionals, this question is easy to answer;
however, for high school counselors it may be a challenging inquiry. “Unfortunately,
school counseling has lacked a consistent identity from state to state, district to district
and even school to school” (American School Counselor Association, 2003). The
expectations of the school counselors come from students, teachers, parents, school
board members, community members, administrators, and other counselors. The many
“hats” that high school counselors wear, can make the role of the school counselor
confusing.
Conflicting messages from supervisors create role conflict (Coll & Freeman,
1997). Thus, attempting to meet the needs of the school community can become an
impossible endeavor. Given that building principals tend to create the school counselor’s
role, most school prescribed duties are incongruent with state and national expectations
(Fitch, Newby, Ballestero, & Marshall, 2001).
As posited by Fitch et al. (2001), school counselors take on many tasks in the
school including scheduling, discipline, and clerical duties. Oftentimes, these tasks that
high school counselors are required to perform are outside of their job description and do
not necessarily help the student body achieve at its highest levels. Principals’ and
counselors’ role perceptions help establish duties and expectations, but role definition is
virtually impossible on a campus, let alone across the state of Texas. By examining the
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 16/120
2
perceptions principals and counselors have of the school counselors’ role should
alleviate inappropriate duties and clearly define the school counselors’ role.
Defining the school counselor’s role is imperative although guidelines exist
(Kirchner & Setchfield, 2005). One guideline was created by the American School
Counselor Association (ASCA) in 2003 in the form of the Comprehensive School
Guidance and Counseling Program national model with four interrelated components for
school counseling programs. The four components are: foundation, delivery system,
management system, and accountability. Another guideline is from the Texas Education
Agency (TEA). It includes eight domains as expectations for school counselors: program
management, guidance, counseling, consultation, coordination, student assessment,
professional behavior, and professional standards.
The first domain, program management, includes planning, implementing,
evaluating, promoting, and managing a comprehensive developmental guidance and
counseling program that includes Guidance Curriculum, Responsive Services, Individual
Planning, and System Support components (Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §33.005, 2007). The
second domain, guidance, involves planning, conducting, and involving students,
teachers, parents, and others to implement effective guidance curriculum. The guidance
curriculum allows the school counselor to guide individuals and groups of students and
parents to plan, monitor, and manage the students’ own career and educational
development including provision of information regarding post-secondary opportunities,
personal and social development (Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §33.007, 2007). The third
domain, counseling , uses proven theories and techniques to provide individual and group
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 17/120
3
developmental, preventive, remedial, and/or crisis counseling. The fourth domain,
consultation, occurs when the school counselor consults with parents, school personnel,
and other community members to help them increase the effectiveness of student
education and promote student success (Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §33.006, 2007), and
provide knowledge to advocate for individual students and specific groups of students.
The fifth domain, coordination, involves the school counselor coordinating people and
resources in the school, home, and community to promote student success and to use a
successful procedure in referring students, parents, and/or others to special programs and
services. The sixth domain, student assessment, the school counselor assists with
interpreting standardized test scores and other assessment data to guide students in goal
setting and planning. The seventh domain, professional behavior, refers to the creating
and upholding of professional relationships with school personnel, parents, and
community members through a commitment to professional development and by
advocating for a school environment that acknowledges and respects diversity. The
eighth domain, professional standards, directs the school counselor to adhere to state,
district, and campus standards, regulations, and procedures. Texas school counselors are
expected to be committed to current professional standards of competence and practice
(19 Tex. Admin. Code § 239.15, 2009), which endorse and uphold ethical and legal
standards, and requires a display of responsible work habits using professional written
and oral communication and interpersonal skills.
While these standards exist, it is the head principal who determines the role and
capacity in which the high school counselor impacts the campus. Given this practice,
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 18/120
4
principals and counselors need to come to an agreement on the assigned responsibilities
and tasks for a more harmonious relationship. At stake is the effectiveness of the school
counselor, school achievement, and accountability.
Statement of the Problem
School counselors are expected to maintain a high level of performance (Beesley,
2004). However, school counselors might not do much counseling if high school
principals are not aware of the national and state expectations, of counselors. “Because
classroom bells or specific time schedules do not bind them, counselors appear readily
available and are often targets for little things to do that are not counseling and guidance
related” (Myrick, 2003, Counselor resistance to accountability section, ¶ 1). Many
stakeholders depend on the high school counselor to be a valuable part of the school
community often leaving them to execute school tasks that no one else has time to
complete. These ancillary tasks inhibit the performance of all eight domains of
counseling established by TEA.
Although school counselors are team players who understand fair-share
responsibilities within a school system, they cannot be fully effective when they
are taken away from essential counseling tasks to perform non-counseling
activities such as: master schedule duties, testing coordinators, detention room
coverage, discipline, classroom coverage, and clerical responsibilities (American
School Counselor Association, 2003).
Ideally, job tasks should be in line with national and state guidelines, the district’s
mission statement, and the needs of the campus.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 19/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 20/120
6
Research Questions
The following questions guided this study:
QUANTITATIVE QUESTIONS:
1. Is there a significant correlation between high school counselors’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
2. Is there a significant correlation between high school principals’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
3. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
4. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
5. What are the most important functions of the high school counselor as perceived
by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standards?
Hypotheses
Ho1: There is no statistically significant correlation between high school counselors’
perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it
relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 21/120
7
Ho2: There is no statistically significant correlation between high school principals’
perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it
relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
Ho3: There is no statistically significant difference between high school counselors’ and
principals’ expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to
the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
Ho4: There is no statistically significant difference between high school counselors’ and
principals’ perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to
the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
Conceptual Framework
For counselors to be effective they need to understand their roles; this is crucial
to an employee’s success and satisfaction. It is common for counselors to be assigned
responsibilities that are not related to counseling (Nelson, Robles-Pina, & Nichter,
2008). All stakeholders should be clear in regard to the counselors’ role. The conceptual
framework for this study is role theory. Discovering the perceptions and expectations of
principals and counselors of the counselors’ role will reveal potential confusion. Role
theory exists when there are inconsistent expectations causing stress, dissatisfaction, and
less effective performance (Rizzo, House, & Lirtzman, 1970). “The appropriate and
effective utilization of school counselors appear to be unclear, not only to students, but
to practicing counselors, school leaders, and the larger educational community”
(Lieberman, 2004, p. 553). When principals give high school counselors inconsistent
messages ineffectiveness and disorder may result; and school counselors may become
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 22/120
8
dissatisfied. Unclear job expectations produce a lot of stress, and frustration will result
when the concepts of counseling remain unclear (Levitt & Jacques, 2005).
Role theory emphasizes (Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, & Snoek, 1964) that role
ambiguity “will result in coping behavior by the role incumbent, which may take the
form of attempts to solve the problem to avoid the sources of stress, or to use defense
mechanisms which distort the reality of the situation” (Rizzo et al., 1970, p. 151).
According to role theory, ambiguity will increase an employee’s dissatisfaction with the
job role, increase anxiety, distort reality, and lead to less effective performance. On the
other hand, role congruence, and certainty, is linked to happiness and life satisfaction
(Perrone, Webb, & Blalock, 2005).
The high school principal determines a high school counselor’s role. Johnson
(1989) found highly significant positive correlations for agreement between the
following four comparison groups: principal perceptions-counselor perceptions,
principal expectations-counselor expectations, principal perceptions-principal
expectations, and counselor perceptions-counselor expectations. These perceptions and
expectations must be synchronized or role conflict and ambiguity will set in among the
high school counselors.
Miscommunication can create role conflict and ambiguity through
inconsistencies. Based on the work of Falls and Nichter (2007) “high school counselors
are challenged with role ambiguity, role conflict, and work overload on a consistent
basis resulting in exposure to chronic job stress, which research indicates can lead to
burnout” (Nelson et al., 2008, pp. 41-42). The researcher used a modified Counselor
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 23/120
9
Function Inventory (CFI) to measure perceptions and expectations of the high school
counselors’ role by principals and counselors as the functions relate to the ASCA
standards.
Definition of Terms
COUNSELOR
A counselor is a certified counseling professional serving in Texas public high
schools as a counselor. This professional has spent two years in the classroom, holds a
master’s degree, and has passed the state certification test. “The holder of a school
counselor certificate issued under the provisions of the Texas Administrative Code may
provide counseling services to students in regular education programs, career and
technology education programs and special education programs in pre-kindergarten
through grade 12” (19 Tex. Admin. Code § 239.15, 2009).
5A high school
A 5A high school is a school that is a tax supported school with open enrollment
in Texas with the enrollment of 1,985 students (University Interscholastic League,
Subchapter 1, Section 351).
PRINCIPAL
A principal is a certified professional serving in Texas public high schools in a
head principal position. “The principal of a school is the instructional leader of the
school and shall be provided with adequate training and personnel assistance to assume
that role” (Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §11.202(a), 2007)).
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 24/120
10
Summary
Confusion exists about the roles of high school counselors. The expectations of
the high school counselor may not be in line with national and state models. The purpose
of this study was to describe the perceptions of high school principals and high school
counselors about the role of high school counselors.
The study has five chapters. Chapter one provides an introduction and overview
of the problem. Chapter two provides a review of the literature. Chapter three consists of
data collection methods, procedures, protocols, instrumentation, and data analysis.
Chapter four reports the results of the study. Chapter five provides a summary,
conclusions, and recommendations.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 25/120
Chapter II
Review of Literature
This chapter provides an overview of the following: history of counseling, the
role of the school counselor, perceptions of the school counselors’ role, role conflict of
school counselors, Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) results in the literature, and
models of school counseling programs. The purpose of this study was to describe the
perceptions of high school principals and high school counselors about the role of high
school counselors. Many of the cases of school counselor roles largely reflect elementary
level counselors; therefore, a need exists for studies to be done at secondary levels,
especially the high school level.
History of Counseling
Guidance and counseling goes back as early as the 1900s. It got its start with
vocational guidance in the 20th century. In the early 1900s, Jesse B. Davis was the first to
set up an orderly and organized guidance program in the public schools (Gladding,
2000). He organized English teachers to incorporate character education and problem
solving skills into their classroom lessons. Frank Parsons also was very influential in the
counseling profession; he was influential in the founding of career counseling, which
was the forerunner of professional counseling, vocational psychology, and counseling
psychology (Pope & Sveinsdottir, 2005). He is considered the “primary architect of
vocational guidance in the United States” (Herr, 2003, p. 22). He is regarded as the
“Father of Guidance” for having established the Boston Vocational Bureau to help
young people make career decisions. Parsons was interested in working with young
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 26/120
12
people who were making decisions impacting their careers. This passion was spurred by
immigrants’ difficulty in searching for job opportunities, which was their main reason
for immigrating to the United States. Parsons upheld high ideals and progressive
attitudes to impact the success of humanity (Pope & Sveinsdottir, 2005).
The Great Depression of the 1930s influenced researchers and practitioners to
emphasize helping strategies and counseling methods that related to choosing and
obtaining employment (Gladding, 2000). John Brewer wrote Education as Guidance
(1932), proposing teachers are counselors and that vocational guidance can be
incorporated into school curriculum. The government became more interested in
counseling during this decade and established the U.S. Employment Service, which
published the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). The DOT is a resource for
career information in the United States and has coded positions according to job titles
(Gladding, 2000).
The creation of the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) and the
National Defense Education Act (NDEA) took place in the 1950s. NDEA had the
biggest impact on school counseling, identifying scientifically and academically talented
students in order to foster their development (Gladding, 2000). This was the space race
era and “school counselors became indirect participants in the Cold War between the
United States and the Soviet Union” (Herr, 2003, p. 31). With the lack of mathematics
and science students to compete with the Russians, American schools were perceived to
have failed. Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite, was launched in 1957 by the
Soviet Union and that signaled the loss of the “space race” for the United States. Not
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 27/120
13
only was the Soviet Union the first country to enter space, but this feat implied that the
quality of the United States’ science and engineering capabilities were inferior. This
indicated that American schools failed to prepare students to be competitive with the
Soviet Union (Herr, 2003). There was a vocational thrust to develop technology based
literacy programs that studied the major industries of the time. Research and
development was now greatly infused into the technology education curriculum (Ritz,
2006). NDEA was determined to create a conduit for the United States to regain its
prestige.
Central to the provisions of the NDEA was the training of large numbers of
secondary professional school counselors and their placement in schools
primarily to test students, identify those capable of entering higher education in
the sciences, and encourage them to do so (Herr, p. 32).
NDEA also intended to raise the nation’s literacy in technical and scientific education
(Ritz, 2006).
The education system was evolving into the vehicle for grooming students to
keep the United States competitive with the eastern world. Education was being used to
restructure society through identification of academically inclined students, and school
counselors were pivotal in this process (Herr). Along with the “space race,” the 1950s
birthed many new counseling theories. These theories included: applied behavioral,
cognitive learning, self-concept, and career development.
The impact of the Civil Rights and Women’s Liberation movements, as well as
legislation effectively mainstreaming all special education students, diverted the
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 28/120
14
attention of professional school counselors to greater emphasis on diversity in
schools and the needs of special populations for guidance and counseling (Herr,
2003, p. 34).
With all these issues being introduced into the school system, counselors were striving to
define best practices to serve their population. To address these issues, the focus was
placed on crisis counseling and short-term interventions (Gladding, 2000).
School counseling truly came into its own as a profession in the 1980s. During
this time training and certification was standardized, counseling was recognized as a
respectable profession, there was an increase in the diversification of counselor
specialties, and emphasized human growth and development (Gladding). Professional
groups such as the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) allow counselors to
come together for purposes such as fellowship, client advocacy, information sharing, and
practice concerns (Ginter, 2002). With efforts such as those of ASCA, counseling has
been able to sustain its importance in schools. Counselors’ identities have grown through
professional organizations such as: American School Counselor Association (ASCA) for
school counselors and American Counseling Association (ACA) for professional
counselors.
With NCLB the expectation for school counselors to be accountable has become
just as strong as it is for other educators. Quality research is mandatory in order for
school counselors to maintain and grow quality school counseling programs. With
quality data, “school counselors will be able to provide active advocacy and leadership
in developing and implementing comprehensive, development, and culturally responsive
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 29/120
15
approaches to removing systemic barriers to the academic achievement of all students”
(Sabella, 2006, p. 413). Tying academic achievement to personal and social development
supports the need for school counseling programs.
The Role of School Counselor
School counselors have a position that is multifaceted. A priority in the school
system is for professional school counselors to implement a comprehensive school
counseling program promoting and enhancing student achievement” (ASCA, 2004).
Developmental stages of students determine the work done by the counselor to ensure
equal opportunities for rigorous educational experiences (ASCA). To promote the school
guidance and counseling program, ASCA has created the following four standards:
1) Foundation. A professional school counselor will create a mission statement
for the school guidance and counseling program that maintains the mission of the school
and promotes all students’ academic, career, and personal/social development. This
foundation will incorporate collaborating with other professionals on the campus and
organizations in the community.
2) Delivery. Professional school counselors will offer assistance to students,
parents, school staff, and the community through school guidance curriculum, individual
student planning, responsive services, and system support.
3) Management . Processes are used to reflect the duties of the professional
school counselor and include: agreements how school counseling programs are
organized and what goals will be accomplished; advisory councils to evaluate school
counseling program results and to make recommendations; student data to make certain
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 30/120
16
every student is benefiting from the school guidance and counseling program; action
plans defining student competencies and achievement results; professional school
counselor’s time of 80% in direct services; and calendars informing and encouraging
active participation in the school guidance and counseling program.
4) Accountability. Professional school counselors will validate the effectiveness
of the school guidance and counseling program through measurable terms. Data will be
used to show how students are benefited because of the school guidance and counseling
program by reporting on immediate, intermediate, and long-range results.
Perceptions of the School Counselors’ Role
School counselors are expected to fulfill many functions in the school setting.
School counselors can aid in enabling families to strengthen their relationship with the
school by strengthening ties and facilitating potential meetings for families to build
relationships with each other. Teaming with staff to organize staff development that
addresses the needs of teachers is often another expectation of school counselors
(Amatea & West-Olatunji, 2007).
Bemak and Chung (2008) looked at reasons that school counselors are reluctant
to new professional roles as required by the ASCA National Model and federal and state
accountability measures. Virtually all school counselors have a desire to please, and the
perception of being “nice people” leads them away from any role that may be viewed as
controversial, confrontational, or challenging (Bemak & Chung, 2008). This attitude is
what contributes to counselors maintaining the status quo and conforming to the
expectations of other school counselors. By using data to strengthen the guidance and
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 31/120
17
counseling program may lead to school counselors having to give up particular duties
assigned in the past, meaning other educators would pick them up. For example,
assistant principals may not be able to rely on school counselors to aid in discipline.
Many counselors feel that if data were to prove that a comprehensive guidance and
counseling program increases student achievement they would not be supported. With
the stress of perpetuating the “nice people” image school counselors fear being
ostracized, being labeled as trouble makers, personal apathy, quilt, anger, powerless, and
personal discomfort if they attempt to be more upfront in using data to close the
achievement gap (Bemak & Chung). Professionally, school counselors feel barriers that
contribute to their inability to implement change include: professional paralysis and
inaction, being viewed as supplemental to teachers and administrators, being bound to
the duties given out by administrators, and job security (Bemak & Chung). It is
imperative for school counselors to be aware of their personal and professional barriers
that keep them from being proactive in their respective roles. To redefine their
professional roles to be aligned with the ASCA National Model and the school and
district’s mission and goals, school counselors will have to be purposeful to incorporate
a comprehensive guidance and counseling program (Bemak & Chung).
In 2005, Zalaquett conducted a study on principals’ perceptions of counseling in
elementary schools in Florida. The study revealed that 500 elementary principals
perceived school counselors as having a positive impact on a student’s academic,
behavioral, and mental health development. The results also indicated that principals
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 32/120
18
held a positive view of the duties and responsibilities of elementary school counselors,
along with agreement of the ASCA National Model (2003).
The link between principals’ perception of the counselor’s role and support for
the school guidance program could be seen when elementary counselors in an urban
setting were studied by Walsh, Barrett, and DePaul (2007). The purpose of Walsh et al.’s
(2007) study was to consider whether or not first year counselors could implement new
practices that had emerged in the recent literature along with the directions in the
Delivery Systems of the ASCA National Model. Three trends were selected for this
study because they appeared most relevant: (a) the implementation of programmatic
approaches to school counseling, (b) the development of collaborative practice, and (c) a
focus on prevention and advocacy (Walsh et al., 2007). Programmatic approaches
include the school counselor working in a more consultation role versus direct
counseling and crisis management. This involves the school counselor working within a
more coherent program that can potentially effect change in the student and the system
such as school, family and the community. Collaborative practices involve the physical,
psychological, social, and family development. All of these influences work together to
offer the student more support. Prevention and advocacy provide services that protect the
student from problems that will impede learning opportunities. A preventive approach is
provided by the national standards that is collaborative and defines a consistent identity
and philosophy for school counselors to implement on their respective campuses (Walsh
et al., 2007). All these elementary counselors reported directly to the campus principal.
In this study the results indicated that newly hired urban school counselors could work in
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 33/120
19
alignment with the ASCA National Model Delivery System, as well as keeping up with
new trends in the profession. By executing the new trends and guidelines these
counselors were also able to earn the support of the principal.
In addition to the perception principals have, the perception of school counselors
of their own roles is part of a guidance program’s success. Holcomb-McCoy and
Mitchell (2005) conducted a study to ascertain how urban school counselors follow the
Gysbers and Henderson (2000) Missouri Model and Myrick’s (1993) model of school
counseling programs. The Missouri Model includes four components: a guidance
curriculum, individual planning, responsive services, and system support. Myrick’s
(1993) model consists of six interventions for school counselors: individual counseling,
small group counseling, classroom guidance/large group guidance, consultation,
coordination, and peer facilitation. One hundred and six counselors, out of 269,
completed the Urban School Counselor Questionnaire. These counselors were from six
urban centers: New York; Newark, New Jersey; Philadelphia; Washington, DC; Trenton,
New Jersey; and Baltimore. These counselors were selected from the American School
Counselor Association (ASCA). The questionnaire was created to discover urban school
counselors’ perceptions of their experiences and roles in their perspective schools.
Holcomb-McCoy and Mitchell (2005) conducted a study with the purpose of
exploring the roles, functions, and perceptions of school counselors in an urban setting.
The major issues that these counselors faced were low family functioning/parenting,
academic achievement, and poverty. This study indicated that non-guidance activities
have not been eliminated from the urban counselors’ role due to the time being spent on
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 34/120
20
doing administrative or clerical work (Holcomb-McCoy & Mitchell). The counselors in
this study reported perceiving themselves as being effective and performing typical
school counseling duties, such as counseling, consultation, and coordinating as
prescribed by Gysbers and Henderson and Myrick (Holcomb-McCoy & Mitchell).
National guidelines advise school counselors devote 80% of their time to
individual counseling services. In a study among school social workers, school
psychologists, and school counselors, Agresta (2004) found that school counselors were
only spending 10% of their time on individual counseling. One hundred sixty-six school
counselors were randomly selected. All were members of the American School
Counselor Association (ASCA). They completed a survey asking to indicate the
proportion of his or her time spent on 21 roles, including the ideal amount of time
dedicated to each role. The respondents also indicated how appropriate each role was for
the position. The professional school counselors in the study indicated that their roles
had turned away from the more traditional duties of academic advisement and
scheduling, as well as college advisement (Agresta, 2004). Conversely, counselors
specified that they would like to spend more of their time on individual and group
counseling services.
Foster, Young, and Hermann (2005) conducted a national study to discover
school counselors’ perceptions of the value of performing work activities that promote
students’ academic, career, and personal/social development. The work activities that
were identified by the counselors as important for student success were also identified as
work activities that are being performed by the counselors. Two questions were
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 35/120
21
addressed: 1) the school counselors’ perceptions of the importance of counselor
effectiveness in performing work activities that promote students’ academic, career, and
personal/social development, and 2) the frequency with which school counselors
performed critical work activities that promote students’ academic, career, and
personal/social development. This study utilized archival data from the National Board
for Certified Counselors (NBCC), including a survey which investigated school
counselors’ ratings of importance and performance frequency of a defined set of work
activities was used (Foster et al.). The survey was given to 2,400 National Certified
Counselors and 526 surveys were returned. All of the participants considered themselves
as school counselors across grade levels. To ensure confidentiality six panel members
were used to organize the work behaviors listed on the survey. The results from the
study indicated that school counselors considered their work important in promoting
students’ academic, career, and personal/social development (Foster et al.). This study
revealed that school counselors were functioning in ways that promote the success of a
student from academic, career, and personal/social development.
Kirchner and Setchfield (2005) conducted a study where 23 counselors and 42
principals completed a survey. The University of Puget Sound offered a course for
principals and counselors in training to introduce each position to the other. The purpose
of their study was to determine how principals and counselors took the information from
the course and used it in their respective roles (Kirchner & Setchfield). Perceptions of
the school counselors’ role by principals and counselors do not usually coincide, creating
a need for congruence. Given that common practice requires that principals assign tasks
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 36/120
22
to school counselors, principal perceptions are significant. This remains a concern of the
profession (Kirchner & Setchfield). Whether or not school counselor roles coincide with
state and national models should be the driving force when defining the school
counselor’s role. Principals and counselors agree about duties that are role congruent,
but do not agree about duties not considered role congruent (Kirchner & Setchfield).
These inconsistencies cause conflict about what school counselors should be doing. With
this confusion a need for further investigation on perceptions exists given that they will
impact role duties and assignments via the principals. However, it may not be the
principals’ lack of knowledge regarding school counselors’ roles that counselors find
themselves performing duties not congruent with national standards; it may just be the
everyday needs of a campus that find principals assigning counselors to duties that need
to be completed (Kirchner & Setchfield).
Pérusse, Goodnough, Donegan, and Jones (2004) conducted a national survey
asking school counselors and elementary and secondary principals about appropriate and
inappropriate tasks for school counselors. All the respondents agreed that the national
standards should be given emphasis by school counseling programs. However, “more
than 80% of secondary school principals identified the following inappropriate tasks as
appropriate: registration and scheduling of all new students; administering cognitive,
aptitude, and achievement tests; and maintaining student records” (Pérusse et al., 2004,
Results section, ¶ 7). The data from the study indicated that school principals and
counselors have not come to an agreement about what the appropriate and inappropriate
job functions are for school counselors. School counselors have the experience and
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 37/120
23
educational background to provide counseling, coordination, guidance and referrals in a
school setting (Pérusse et al., 2004). The roles for the school counselor must be more
clearly defined.
An effective and collaborative relationship between the school principal and
counselor is vital for counselors to fulfill appropriate roles effectively (Chata & Loesch,
2007). Chata and Loesch conducted a study of future school principals’ view about the
school counselors’ role in alignment with the ASCA National Model. Principals-in-
training were able to differentiate between appropriate and inappropriate professional
school counselor job duties as related to recommendations in the ASCA National Model
(Chata & Loesch). The results of this study are positive for school counselors, and future
principals are to some extent aware of appropriate roles for the counselor as outlined by
ASCA.
A qualitative study conducted by Amatea and Clark (2005) assessed 26
administrators’ perceptions of the school counselor’s role. From the study most of the
administrators agreed upon work responsibilities done by the counselor, but they did not
agree upon the value they gave to some of the work responsibilities. Four role
conceptions were defined: the innovative school leader, the collaborative case
consultant, the responsive direct service provider, and the administrative team player.
These four role conceptions are similar to school guidance and counseling program
models that have been given support in the past (Amatea & Clark). As listed in the
ASCA National Model (2003), the innovative school leader role is the most
contemporary and, yet was least described by administrators as a preference for their
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 38/120
24
counselors (Amatea & Clark). This statement implies, and the study confirms, that
principals prefer the role of the counselor to be more traditional. This preference for the
traditional could be the result of a lack of knowledge about school counselor roles.
Clark and Amatea (2004) also examined the perceptions of 23 elementary,
middle, and high school teachers about counseling and guidance services, how the
services should be delivered, and the expectations of how school counselors contribute
and their working relationships. The researchers also interviewed school counseling
graduate students regarding their future role. Teachers were asked voluntarily to
participate based on working in a public school for at least two years, worked in a school
with at least one school counselor, and willing to participate in a 30-45 minute interview.
Several themes resulted from the interviews: teacher perceptions of school counselors,
valuing of direct services to students, counselor visibility and school-wide involvement,
and knowledge about special students’ needs. The themes that emerged from the
interviewers’ accounts of their experience in talking with the teachers were: building
relationships: collaboration and teamwork, counselor visibility, educating teachers, and
classrooms and schools as systems. School counselors need to be a part of the school
system to create a collaborative working environment with a principal’s support this is
possible. Through national and state guidelines, models provide the foundation and
rationale for the common goal of helping students achieve inside and outside the
classroom (Clark & Amatea, 2004).
In 2002 Aluede and Imonikhe investigated how secondary school teachers and
students in the city of Benin in Edo State, Nigeria, view the role of the school counselor.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 39/120
25
The purpose of the study was to determine the level of clarity and definition surrounding
the perceived roles of school counselors among students and teachers in the Nigerian
school system (Aluede & Imonikhe, 2002). It was a descriptive study that included 540
students and 120 teachers from all of the public secondary schools in Benin Metropolis
of Edo State, Nigeria. Two instruments were used: the Students’ Perception of School
Counselor Roles Scale (SPSCRS) and the Teachers’ Perception of School Counselor’s
Roles Scale (TPSCRS). Results from the study indicate that students view the counselor
as an academic advisor and that teachers believe counselors make a positive contribution
to the instructional program by providing professional or technical advice.
A study of the perceptions of future administrators of the school counselors’ role
was conducted by Fitch, Newby, Ballestero, and Marshall in 2001 at two Kentucky
universities; this study indicated that administrators are not knowledgeable about the role
of counselors because they do not understand what school counselors have been
educated to do. Graduate administrative courses do not educate future school principals
about the role of the school counselor or the details of a comprehensive school guidance
and counseling program (Fitch et al.). Administrators glean most of their knowledge
from their personal experiences with school counselors from when they were in school
and as their supervisor. Usually administrators determine the role of the counselor,
which leads to duties that are often incongruent with state and national role statements
(Fitch et al., 2001). This is critical because administrators supervise school counselors
and the implementation of the school guidance and counseling program. Campus
principals determine the roles and functions that school counselors carry out, as opposed
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 40/120
26
to what the standards require (Chata & Loesch, 2007). Barriers were identified to
implementing school guidance and counseling program: scheduling, discipline, and
clerical duties absorb much of a school counselor’s time (Fitch et al.).
In 2007, Dollarhide, Smith, and Lemberger conducted a qualitative study that
researched events that may give reason for the support of the principal for a school
counselor. Principals were surveyed to establish the critical incidents they identify as
meaningful and significant in their appreciation of school counseling (Dollarhide et al.).
The principals that agreed to participate in the study had at least one of the following
qualifications: had been awarded by their state ASCA organization for their support of
school counseling, were principal of a school that had a Recognized ASCA Model
Programs (RAMPs), or were recognized by ASCA as supporting a comprehensive
school counseling program. There were a total of 61 principals invited to participate, and
19 accepted. The principals were asked open-ended interview questions and they were
allowed to respond via e-mail or telephone. Three domains were extrapolated from the
interviews, they were: prior exposure to school counseling, present perspectives on
school counseling, and recommendations for school counseling. The results of this study
did not support evidence that k-12 contact or graduate studies training determined
support (Dollarhide et al.). Relationships built between the principal and the school
community was the most important indicator of a successful school counseling program
(Dollarhide et al.). Principals in the study realized that the support of the school
counseling program may create a home and school connection, as well as possibly
among teachers, administrators, and students.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 41/120
27
Scarborough and Culbreth (2002) studied the congruence between the actual
practice of school counselors and preferred practice in relation to a comprehensive
guidance and counseling program. Elementary, middle, and high school counselors were
surveyed from two southern states with a total of 361 useable surveys returned. The
individuals completed the School Counselor Activity Rating Scale (SCARS), the
Counselor Self-Efficacy Scale (CSS), and the School Climate Scale (SCS). Counselors
reported they preferred not to spend their time associated with non-guidance-related
duties (Scarborough & Culbreth). Unlike elementary school counselors, high school
counselors were least likely to be practicing the way they preferred (Scarborough &
Culbreth). High school counselors wanted to spend more time in individual counseling,
consultation, coordination, and curriculum activities compared to the amount of time
they were spending (Scarborough & Culbreth). This finding indicates that at least some
school counselors want to spend more time participating in a comprehensive guidance
and counseling program. Evidently, experience accounted for differences between
“actual and preferred” counseling tasks (Scarborough & Culbreth). Basically this study
suggests that school counselors
were more likely to be engaging in tasks as they preferred if they believe that the
tasks led to particular outcomes and if they, as well as the tasks they were
performing, were supported by members of the organizational system of the
school where they were employed (Scarborough & Culbreth, 2002, p. 456).
School counselors prefer to spend their time performing functions that are congruent
with a comprehensive developmental school guidance and counseling program
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 42/120
28
(Scarborough & Culbreth). All grade level counselors want to participate in their
counseling role as defined by best practice, ASCA.
In the spring of 2008, a study was done to research the differences between the
actual practice and the preferred practice of Texas high school counselors. Nelson,
Robles-Pina, and Nichter (2008) used the School Counselor Activity Rating Scale
[SCARS] (Scarborough, 2002) to survey the role of Texas high school counselors that
focus on the national standards as defined by the American School Counselor
Association (ASCA). A total of 475 Texas high school counselors completed an online
survey, SCARS (Scarborough), with a return rate of 31%. The majority of the
respondents were Caucasian, suburban high school counselors with 10-20 years (Nelson
et al., 2008). The findings from the study “indicated that in the activities related to
counseling, consultation, curriculum, and coordination, high school counselors actually
do less but would prefer to do more of these activities and less other or clerical duties”
(Nelson et al., 2008, p.38). As in Scarborough and Culbreth’s study, counselors with
more experience participate in more counseling activities. Nelson et al. discovered high
school counselors spent much of their time participating in non-counseling or other
activities (2008). It was also discovered, similar to Scarborough and Culbreth , that
counselors with more than 10 years experience reported more counseling activities
(Nelson et al., 2008). Nelson et al. (2008) found that high school counselors in urban
settings do more counseling than counselors in suburban settings, and Hispanic
counselors do more counseling than Caucasian and African American high school
counselors.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 43/120
29
Virtually all research points to what the ASCA National Model outlines as the
professional duties of a school counselor and the assignments that principals give school
counselors are not congruent (Leuwerke, Walker, & Shi, 2009). Due to all the demands
and expectations from the state regarding student accountability, principals are
challenged to utilize all personnel to make gains in student achievement. This stress can
cause strain between principals and counselors. Campus principals often delegate
administrative duties to school counselors that are not aligned to the national standards
as developed by ASCA (Leuwerke, Walker, & Shi). Leuwerke, Walker, and Shi
conducted a study to examine principals exposure to the ASCA standards and if that
exposure had an impact on their perceptions of school counselors. A total of 337
principals in Iowa completed an online survey, 93 of the principals were from high
school campuses. From the results it was discovered that over half of the principals have
never been exposed to the ASCA National Model. When principals were provided
information regarding the amount of time counselors should spend according to the
national model, principals were agreeable to the idea. Principals also agreed that
appropriate tasks, as listed by ASCA, were much more important than inappropriate
tasks. Once principals were educated about the ASCA National Model, principals
supported counselors spending more time for delivery of the guidance curriculum,
system, and responsive services (Leuwerke, Walker, & Shi). School counselors taking
time to educate principals on the ASCA National Standards will improve the campus’
guidance and counseling program.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 44/120
30
To have a better understanding of the secondary school counselors’ role,
principals must embrace a comprehensive school guidance and counseling program
(McGlothlin & Miller, 2008). With the national standards provided by ASCA, principals
confirm, or refute, their perceptions of the school counselors’ role. Counselors are
obligated to provide services that are conducive to the district and campus goals. School
counselors must also ensure creating guidance and counseling programs that are linked
to the mission of the school and district and strive to increase academic success
(McGlothlin & Miller). As principals realize the impact a comprehensive guidance and
counseling program can have on student achievement, hiring effective counselors is
imperative. During interviews, secondary principals and counselors can begin dialog
about goals for a guidance and counseling program within the school, and the role the
counselor will play (McGlothin & Miller). When principals and counselors can outline
the role of the counselor from the start of a working relationship, role conflict may be
avoided. Throughout the initial job interview principals should pay attention to answers
that are in line with the missions of their schools and are congruent for effective
counseling programs (McGlothin & Miller).
Once a district determines it is ready to implement the ASCA National Model,
increasing academic success must be tied to the goals of the school district as well as the
secondary school counselors (McGlothin & Miller, 2008). The ASCA National Model
not only guides schools to work with students in crisis while promoting academics, but it
also can steer hiring and keeping school counselors. Principals need to use counselors in
the most effective way to increase student achievement without overwhelming them with
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 45/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 46/120
32
Findings from this study suggest some of the reasons for this confusion: (a) all
key players do not know what a school counselor’s role is, and when they do,
they do not always agree on that role; (b) the power differentials inherent in the
relationships among key players make it difficult for the school counselor’s role
to become institutionalized; and (c) economic, regional, local, and student needs
play a significant part in altering the daily functioning of an individual
professional school counselor’s duties (Monteiro-Leitner et al., ¶ 25).
These findings give more support to the idea that schools should follow state and
national models. ASCA (2003) developed guidelines that enhance the efficacy of the
school counselor’s role within the school. ASCA (2007) supports the school counselor’s
effort in developing students’ abilities to focus on academic, personal/social and career
development in order to achieve success and be contributing members to society. The
four components: foundation, delivery system, management systems, and accountability
guide schools in designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating a comprehensive,
developmental and systematic school counseling program (ASCA, 2003).
There seems to be a lack of professional identity among school counselors. Role
expectations vary by professionals, campuses, districts, and states. Coll and Freeman
(1997) studied perceptions that cause role conflict among elementary counselors. The
researchers found that extra duties such as: substitute teaching, lunchroom and
playground duty, and administrative tasks that the elementary school counselors were
performing are not consistent with national standards (Coll & Freeman, 1997). School
counselors view their roles with dissatisfaction in regard to the manner in which their
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 47/120
33
professional skills and abilities are used by the building principal (Chata & Loesch,
2007). Role conflict can result in negative consequences that are both personal and
professional (Coll & Freeman, 1997). Kahn et al. (1964) identified several consequences
of role conflict: intensified internal conflict, increased tension associated with various
aspects of the job, reduced satisfaction with the job and its various components,
decreased confidence in superiors and organization, and social and psychological
withdrawal. Although little research has been done on role conflict of school counselors
Coll and Freeman (1997) concluded that elementary school counselors experience more
role conflict because they have more roles and functions than school counselors at the
secondary level.
School guidance and counseling programs need to become more parallel with
national and state standards. Without this interconnection school counselors have
different views about their roles and how to best use their time and skills (Burnham &
Jackson, 2000). What counselors are doing and what the national and state models
expect them to do, need to ensure implementing successful school guidance and
counseling programs. Burnham and Jackson discussed the role of school counselors and
discrepancies in role implementation based on models. Based on results from the study,
school counselors are performing duties described in current program models (Burnham
& Jackson), although discrepancies and variations exist. The authors suggest more
consultation concepts; group guidance, group counseling, and implementation of a
guidance program; leadership skills for advocating for students, and assessment skills.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 48/120
34
Burnham and Jackson identified non-guidance duties as the most troublesome in
defining the counselors’ role, and these duties need to be identified and reassigned.
Accountability of the Professional School Counselor
The ASCA National Model provides opportunities for counselors to use and
assess quantitative and qualitative data-gathering techniques (Sabella, 2006).
Accountability has become a necessity in all schools and districts, including school
counseling programs. Decisions for student academic improvement and success must be
made and evaluated through the use of data. ASCA put together a research summit in St.
Louis focusing on: 1) defining major research questions, 2) developing usable research
strategies focusing on accountability, 3) discussing the structural elements of a nation
research agenda, 4) identifying researchers and practitioners to collaborate, and 5)
identifying a dissemination and recognition plan (Sabella). This summit led to ASCA
creating the National School Counseling Research Center (NSCRC). The NSCRC is
supportive and encouraging of school counselors to maintain accountability at the
national, state, and local levels.
In a replicated study by Webb, Brigman, and Campbell (2005) a counselor-led
intervention was put into place using a structured group approach. This group was to
improve academic and social skills of elementary and middle school students. The goal
of this replication was to strengthen the intervention while contributing to the body of
empirically based school counseling outcome research (Webb, Brigman, & Campbell,
2005). The intervention is the Student Success Skills (SSS) and focuses on a) cognitive
and metacognitive skills such as goal setting, progress monitoring, and memory skills; b)
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 49/120
35
social skills such as interpersonal skills, social problem solving, listening, and teamwork
skills; and c) self-management skills managing attention, motivation, and anger. With
this study, the outcome of the students can be tied to the performance of the school
counselor. Putting into place an accountability measure indicates whether or not a
counseling program is effective (White, 2007).
Student success and achievement needs to improve. School counselors have
specific knowledge in order to implement a comprehensive guidance and counseling
program to increase student academic achievement (White, 2007). School counselors are
trained to apply research-based interventions that can increase academics. Through the
accountability of school counseling programs, can come an agreement of academic
outcomes between school counselors and other educational stakeholders. By advocating
for an accountability system, counselors can promote their profession and alleviate some
of the role ambiguity they face (Curry & Lambie, 2007). The ability to measure the
impact that counselors have on students’ achievement can possibly present significant
data in advocating for the role of school counselors and comprehensive guidance and
counseling programs. All students should have the opportunity to benefit from a
guidance and counseling program and to demonstrate the positive impact it can have on
their academic achievement (Curry & Lambie, 2007).
Accountability and achievement create an opportunity for school counselors to
become more involved in the educational process affecting academic outcomes (Webb,
Brigman, & Campbell, 2005). A total of 418 students from 20 schools in Florida
participated in this study. Half of the students were elementary students and the other
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 50/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 51/120
37
In 2005 Eschenauer and Chen-Hayes wrote an article discussing the
Transformative Individual School Counseling (TISC) model and its use with urban
school counselors. The TISC model utilizes a functional behavioral assessment to define
problems; systemic, solution-focused, and narrative counseling approaches to address
problems; and single-case study designs for assessment (Eschenauer & Chen-Hayes).
The idea is that individual counseling can be an aid in closing achievement and access
gaps in education (Eschenauer & Chen-Hayes). It is a component of a comprehensive
school guidance and counseling program outlined by ASCA. Individual counseling
should be supported with empirical data and models, and school counselors should
evaluate the interventions used in their work (Eschenauer & Chen-Hayes). Without
connecting practice to research, school counselors risk the invalidity of their work. With
more and more accountability standards being placed on schools, there is pressure for
school counselors to also practice in ways that can be measured. The authors created the
TISC model to assess results to address achievement and opportunity gaps in urban
schools (Eschenauer & Chen-Hayes). The model guides the counselor through data
collection to evaluate the success of counseling interventions, particularly, individual
counseling. Using the TISC model facilitates the documentation of outcomes given by
the ASCA National Standards (Eschenauer & Chen-Hayes).
Sink and Spencer (2007) did a psychometric study on the validity and reliability
of The My Class Inventory-Short Form for teachers. This form is for elementary school
counselors as an accountability tool to use to determine the effectiveness of their school
guidance and counseling program. The My Class Inventory-Short Form “assesses
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 52/120
38
teachers’ perceptions of the classroom climate as they relate to five scales: overall
student satisfaction with the learning experience, peer relations, difficulty level of
classroom materials, student competitiveness, and school counselor impact on the
learning environment” (Sink & Spencer, ¶1).
To determine the psychometric characteristics of the instrument, descriptive
statistics were used. Three hundred and seventy-one K-6th grade elementary teachers
from the western Washington area working at ethnically diverse urban elementary
schools participated. Each school with participating teachers had at least a half-time
certified professional school counselor. The findings from the study indicate that the
instrument adequately measures classroom climate as perceived by teachers (Sink &
Spencer, 2007). Ultimately, this is a research-based accountability tool (Sink &
Spencer). Through the evaluation of the school guidance and counseling program, school
counselors can demonstrate their effectiveness through measures that are cost-effective
and psychometrically sound.
Isaacs (2003) wrote an article that discusses accountability of school guidance
and counseling programs from a national level. A new national office, Student
Achievement and School Accountability (SASA), “promotes accountability for
improving student achievement by ensuring that states implement rigorous systems of
standards, assessments, and accountability that motivate educators to assume
responsibility for getting each and every student to achieve at high levels” (Isaacs, ¶ 3).
With schools being held to higher and higher accountability standards, there is a need to
incorporate school counselors. High expectations in education are being applied to all
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 53/120
39
educators and this includes school counselors. ASCA has created a national model for
schools to use in implementing a school guidance and counseling program. Along with
this program is an accountability component. When school counselors take ownership of
accountability standards, such as those posed by ASCA, the element of role confusion is
removed. The minimal accountability that professional school counselors have provided,
have left many counselors without appropriate data to justify a guidance and counseling
program (Isaacs).
As educational standards and goals increase, school counselors need a clearly
defined role. Professional school counselors must become more concerned about the
data in order to effectively transform school counseling programs into responsive
interventions based on information (Isaacs, 2003). With the use of data, school
counselors can provide evidence of what their jobs entail. The data can also be applied to
academic achievement, which in the end is what schools want to improve. Through data
collection, decision-making, and evaluation school counseling programs can provide
appropriate and measurable accountability systems (Isaacs). Unfortunately, some school
counselors may back away from using data to make decisions due to their inexperience
in collecting and applying data. Nonetheless, the time has come for school counselors to
become comfortable with using and applying data because accountability is here to stay
and will aide in legitimizing the school counselors’ role. “By conducting needs
assessments, aligning with school improvement goals, identifying achievement barriers
specific to their students, and engaging other educators and stakeholders in the process,
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 54/120
40
school counselors can effectively direct their professional expertise and time to
contribute to achievement improvement” (Isaacs, Conclusion section, ¶ 40).
M.E.A.S.U.R.E (Dahir and Stone, 2003) is an accountability system for school
counselors to utilize in making decisions to strengthen a school and district’s
comprehensive guidance and counseling program. It is a model to collect information so
data-driven decisions can be made in order to raise student achievement. As supported
by the ASCA National Model, M.E.A.S.U.R.E is a model that enables school counselors
to document the impact of the school counseling program. Through an accountability
system counselors can demonstrate their ability to aid in closing the achievement gap.
In 2009 Dahir and Stone summarized school counselors’ action research to align
counseling programs with accountability standards and the ASCA National Model. The
counselors used the MEASURE model (Dahir & Stone, 2003), a seven-step process to
enable counselors to assess their efforts by using data. The acronym stands for: mission
(tie the goals of the counseling program to the mission of the district and each campus),
elements (using critical data elements that are important to all stakeholders), analyze
(analyzing data to determine what is adversely affecting student achievement),
stakeholders unite (determine which stakeholders need to be involved in addressing
school improvement issues), results (use outcome data to determine effectiveness of
goals and decide whether to make changes while addressing the guidance and counseling
program), and educate (publicize the positive impact that the school guidance and
counseling program has on student achievement). Utilizing a counselor-led model to
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 55/120
41
show the positive impact a school guidance and counseling program has, gives it
credibility and accountability when discussing student achievement.
Dahir and Stone (2009) collected data from 2003 to 2006. More than 175 school
counselors submitted results from their action research using the MEASURE model: 14
from elementary schools, 6 from middle schools, 33 from high schools, and 24 were part
of one district. When identifying school improvement goals more than 50% of
elementary counselors chose improving grades and raising test scores, 50% of the
middle school counselors chose improving grades, and slightly less than 50% of the high
school counselors chose improving grades. Of all the plans 89% chose an academic goal
as their primary focus. Elementary counselors had the high gains in student grades with a
2% increase on the targeted group and up to 50% of the 4th and 5th graders. Eighty-five
percent of high school plans targeted 9th grade failures and decreased the failure rate and
increased promotion of students to the 10 th grade. The focus of this study was to
demonstrate school counselors’ ability to use an accountability model to focus on school
improvement needs and by using that data increase student achievement.
Through accountability school counselors can provide evidence that the school
guidance and counseling program positively contributes to academic achievement.
Collecting data gives support to the unique contribution school counselors make on
instruction (Otwell & Mullis, 1997). With an appropriate accountability system,
counselor can tie interventions to cognitive development and learning, along with
improved grades and test scores (Otwell & Mullis). When planning a comprehensive
school guidance program, counselors must take into consideration ways to help students
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 56/120
42
learn more effectively and efficiently, combined with accountability efforts (Otwell &
Mullis). This will reveal the importance of the school counseling program on a campus
and the impact it makes on student achievement.
Readiness
Authors Carey, Harrity, and Dimmitt (2005) discussed an assessment instrument
to determine a school district’s readiness to implement the ASCA standards. As
accountability becomes more prevalent in public schools, school counselors will also be
expected to demonstrate their impact on achievement. Academic student achievement is
possible with standards-based educational reform interventions and is linked to the
ASCA National Model (Carey et al.). The self-assessment instrument designed by the
authors allows all stakeholders to identify the readiness of a district to determine
successful implementation of the ASCA model.
Seven readiness factors were identified: Community Support, Leadership,
Guidance Curriculum, Staffing/Time Use, School Counselors’ Beliefs and Attitudes,
School Counselors’ Skills, and District Resources. Three days were spent observing the
ASCA model in an Arizona school district. Twenty school counselors at the 2003
Massachusetts School Counselors Association conference then reviewed the instrument.
From the feedback, revisions were made. Then the instrument was used in consultations
with three New England school districts. The assessment is designed for use in the early
stages of the implementation process. The assessment is to be completed by counselors,
administrators, and teachers. This should assist principals in understanding the role of
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 57/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 58/120
44
Dahir et al. (2009) research indicated that gaps exist in the counselors’ ability to
accept and implement the model during the initial phases and need professional
development. This could be due to the fact that most states do not hold trainings to
support the implementation of the model. This lack of support may be the cause of the
high school counselors’ readiness to embrace and progress towards the model (Dahir et
al.). For school counselors to accept a new paradigm, plenty of professional development
is needed to give support. Increasing counselors’ confidence will more easily reaffirm
their abilities to implement a comprehensive school counseling program (Dahir et al.).
In 2008, Poynton, Schumacher, and Wilczenski conducted a pilot study to
determine school counselors’ attitudes concerning implementation of a statewide
comprehensive guidance and counseling model. The Massachusetts School Counseling
Association (MASCA) developed a state comprehensive guidance and counseling
program that is congruent with the ASCA National Model. The MASCA State Model
has also included a career development component. Throughout the statewide
implementation of the program, Poynton, Schumacher, and Wilczenski (2008) studied
the perceptions of school counselors’ role change. For the framework of this study, the
researchers used the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) by Hall & Hord (2001).
The CBAM (2001) presents several assumptions about change: a) change is a process,
not an event; b) change is accomplished by individuals; c) change is a highly personal
experience; d) change involves developmental growth in feelings and skills; and e)
change can be facilitated by interventions directed toward individuals and contexts.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 59/120
45
Poynton, Schumacher, and Wilczenski (2008) disseminated about 1,400
questionnaires online, in the MASCA monthly newsletter, and at the MASCA annual
conference. Total participation was 10%, 140 questionnaires were returned. The findings
of the survey indicated that the school counselors were in the early stages of the CBAM
and very concerned how they would be affected personally. Through much publication
through professional organizations the study reinforced that school counselors were very
aware of the state model. The study indicated that counselors need more information on
a campus level about how their roles will change. Poynton, Schumacher, and Wilczenski
(2008) suggest professional development and mentoring with experienced participants to
understand how the model will impact the counselors’ day-to-day schedules. Using the
CBAM to study change, districts anywhere could monitor the implementation of state
model or the ASCA National Model.
Previous Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) Results
Previous CFI results generally reveal that school principals and counselors share
similar perceptions regarding what school counselors do and should be doing. (Johnson,
1989; Maser, 1971; & Moore, 1997). The present study will examine the difference in
perception between high school principals and high school counselors about the role of
high school counselors in Texas.
Arthur L. Maser (1971) studied the secondary school counselors’ role in Highline
Public School District near Seattle in an effort to clear up confusion and enhance
communication among campus staff. He studied the perceptions of the school
counselors’ role by junior high and senior high school administrators, counselors, and
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 60/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 61/120
47
foundation, delivery system, management systems and accountability. Unfortunately,
many situations arise when school counselors are unable to maintain the ASCA model.
ASCA supports the school counseling profession and developed national
standards to legitimize the field. In 1999, 15 school counselors and counselor educators
were gathered to develop a more comprehensive framework. In June 2002, the model
was introduced at the ASCA national convention where it was well received.
Educational stakeholders with the ability to make decisions regarding the school
counseling program should learn, embrace, and put into practice the ASCA national
model (Schwallie-Giddis, ter Maat, & Pak, 2003). The standards also provide guidelines
for evaluating the program in order to hold school counselors accountable.
The authors recommended a leadership team, counselor education, and a
framework for practicing counselors to have success with the new standards. The
Northern Virginia School Counselors’ Leadership Team then held a summit. This team
was made up of 19 counseling professionals. First, ASCA’s National Model was
introduced and described. Second, small groups were created to discuss reactions to the
model and the reality of it being implemented in their professional daily lives. Third, the
small groups discussed with an administrator the first steps toward implementation of
the model in their district and on their campus. The Summit was exceptionally
successful and made gains in initiating action and reform (Schwallie-Giddis et al., 2003).
With proper use of the national standards the needs of students should be
addressed and the achievement gap should begin to close. “The model provides
legitimacy to the school counseling profession; a profession that is often criticized,
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 62/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 63/120
49
1. Is there a significant correlation between high school counselors’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
2. Is there a significant correlation between high school principals’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
3. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
4. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
5. What are the most important functions of the high school counselor as perceived
by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standards?
Summary
The role of the high school counselor is complex. The perceptions of the role of
the high school counselor may differ between the school principal and counselor. To
better help clear up this confusion, national and state standards have been created by
ASCA and TEA to clarify the role of the high school counselor and define appropriate
roles (Kirchner & Setchfield, 2005). Knowing the perceptions of high school principals
and counselors will assist in determining, and clarifying, the high school counselors’
role. The literature is limited on the principals’ perceptions of school counselors
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 64/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 65/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 66/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 67/120
53
principals and 241 5A high school counselors was the targeted population, with a
potential total of 482 participants. The University Interscholastic League (UIL) has
classified these schools by population.
Sample
The sample was based on all 5A public high schools as classified by the
University Interscholastic League (UIL). This list of schools can be found on the UIL
website http://www.uil.utexas.edu/. Of the 482 potential participants, a total of 249
principals and counselors voluntarily completed the survey. Of the 249 participants,
there were 113 principals and 136 counselors. The completed surveys produced a
51.66% return rate.
Procedure
An introductory letter was mailed to each high school head principal and lead
counselor stating that the survey was available soon and requesting participation. Email
addresses were obtained through school websites. The modified CFI was emailed to each
school’s head principal and lead counselor with instructions about filling out the survey
via SurveyMonkey to approximately 241 public high school principals and 241 high
school lead counselors in 9-12 campuses classified as 5A by the UIL. Each individual
received an introductory email that provided instructions. Follow-up emails were sent to
those who did not respond on a weekly basis. The response rate was 51.66%; thus 249
surveys were analyzed.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 68/120
54
Instrument
Original Counselor Function Inventory (CFI)
The Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) was constructed by Shumake and Oelke
in 1967 “to study the major service areas of the counseling program in terms of the level
of responsibility and participation on the part of the counselor” (p. 130). A modified
version of the CFI was used for this study (See Appendix B). Maser (1971), Johnson
(1989), and Moore (1997) also used the CFI in their studies, as was noted in the Review
of Literature.
The original CFI included 77 functions that were designed to cover seven areas
of counselor services: placement, counseling, follow-up, orientation, student data,
information, and miscellaneous. The CFI was meant to study selected counselor
functions in these terms (Shumake & Oelke, 1967):
1. Should the counselor personally perform the function?
2. Should the counselor have primary responsibility for the function, although
he/she might not personally perform the function?
3. Should the counselor share with other groups in planning and performing the
function, even though he/she does not have primary responsibility for the
function?
4. Should the counselor serve as a consultant for the function only upon request?
5. Should the counselor have no direct responsibility for the function?
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 69/120
55
VALIDITY
Once the CFI was constructed, it was submitted to educators from the fields of
counseling, research, testing, and educational psychology. These educators evaluated the
CFI’s validity to determine:
1. Whether the items of the CFI are clearly stated.
2. Whether each item is suitable to describe a given function.
3. Whether the items in each group adequately describe a stated service.
The CFI was then submitted to 30 school counselors, each completing the survey and
evaluating the items with respect to wording and purpose (Shumake & Oelke, 1967).
The educators concluded that the CFI was adequate in covering the functions of
counselors.
RELIABILITY
To ensure reliability, a re-test method was used with two groups. One group
included actively employed secondary school counselors from within the state of
Georgia, and the other group included actively employed school administrators within
Georgia. Each group was administered the survey twice several weeks apart. The
correlation between the administrations was computed by the Spearman formula for rank
order correlation. This correlation (rho) was used to compute reliability of the possible
responses. “The rank order correlation for the two administrations of the CFI to the
school counselors was .96 and to the school administrators .94” (Shumake & Oelke,
1967, p. 131).
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 70/120
56
MODIFIED COUNSELOR FUNCTION INVENTORY (CFI)
The CFI was selected for this study because it has been shown to have both
validity and reliability, and has been successfully used in previous studies. There have
been format modifications for this study, but the content has not been altered.
Modifications
The CFI was modified for this study in the following manner:
1. Each item is mutually exclusive.
2. By inserting a box around the Likert scale and its descriptors at the top of each
page.
3. The Likert responses state “does/should” instead of “should” to reflect
perception/expectation (Johnson, 1989).
4. A column is on each side of the items. Column A represents what functions
counselors should do. Column B represents what they currently do (Moore,
1997).
5. The modified survey contains only 42 questions. Items were eliminated that are
now outdated or considered as unethical practices. For example, each item
placing students in part-time and summer jobs and making decisions concerning
special grouping of students. Items were combined to reflect the ASCA
standards.
6. The CFI was administered in an online format through SurveyMonkey to ensure
confidentiality. SurveyMonkey allows the user to create confidential surveys and
assists in analyzing data.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 71/120
57
VALIDITY
Validity was established through expert opinion. After evaluation, a panel of
educators determined the CFI as valid in addressing the different functions of school
counselors.
RELIABILITY
To determine reliability the results were run using Cronbach Alpha. The results
were α = .872, which indicates that there was consistency and reliability in what each
survey item tested.
Research Design
This study replicated Maser, Johnson, and Moore’s administration of the
modified Counseling Function Inventory (CFI) (2008) to high school principals and
counselors (Shumake & Oelke, 1967). The dependent variables are the CFI scores. The
independent variables are the type of school personnel (principals and counselors). In
this quantitative study, the population consisted of high school principals and counselors
in Texas 5A high schools that were surveyed.
On the modified CFI survey, respondents rated the 42 counselor functions on a
five-point Likert scale.
1-The counselor should personally perform this function (has total responsibility).
2-The counselor should have primary responsibility for this function, although he/she
may not personally perform the function.
3-The counselor should share with other groups in planning and performing this
function, but he/she does not have primary responsibility for function.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 72/120
58
4-The counselor should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.
5-The counselor should have no direct responsibility for this function (Johnson, 1989).
The scores were then correlated, and t-tests were run, for significant agreement
or disagreement. Scores were compared with ASCA standards, perceptions, and
expectations of high school counselors and principals. The Pearson r for rank order
correlation and independent sample t-test were used for comparison. The data were
tabulated to show the number of school counselor functions in each of the counselor
groups according to the degree and nature of participation. Both Johnson (1989) and
Moore (1997) tested for significance at .01 level, in this study the correlation was tested
for significance at .05 level.
Limitations
The study was limited to 5A public high schools in Texas. The researcher did not
identify the differences between rural, urban, and suburban schools. Participants
volunteered to participate in the study limiting the number of participants. The study did
not include an examination of elementary and middle school principals’ and counselors’
perceptions. These limitations impacted external validity, meaning that generalizing
among principals and counselors is not possible.
Summary
The research questions were answered with the responses of Texas 5A high
school principals and counselors from the modified CFI. The goal of the study was to
indicate the agreement, or disagreement, between high school principals and counselors
regarding the functions that counselors should perform in relation to the ASCA
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 73/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 74/120
Chapter IV
FINDINGS
Overview
The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) developed national
standards for school counselors to follow in order to maintain a complete comprehensive
guidance and counseling program. These national standards also clarify the role of the
school counselor. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of high
school principals and high school counselors about the role of high school counselors.
The population for this study was limited to only 5A high school head principals and
lead counselors, or the counselor with the most experience. Both groups were surveyed
about the functions that the school counselor should perform and actually does perform.
The variables were the CFI scores and the type of school personnel (principals and
counselors).
This chapter presents the results of the findings for the five research questions.
The questions read:
1. Is there a significant correlation between high school counselors’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
2. Is there a significant correlation between high school principals’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 75/120
3. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
4. Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
5. What are the most important functions of the high school counselor as perceived
by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standards?
Research Question 1
Is there a significant correlation between the high school counselors’ perceptions
and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
Ho1: There is no statistically significant correlation between high school
counselors’ perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI)
scores as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
To answer the question a bivariate correlation analysis using Pearson r was run at
the p = .05 level. Table 1 lists the functions from the CFI as they relate to the ASCA
standards. The functions listed are numbered to reflect the numbering from the survey.
Included are the correlation coefficient and the p level generated from the CFI scores of
high school counselors. Correlation statistically significant at p < .05 are indicated by an
asterisk.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 76/120
TABLE 1
Counselors’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards *=significance
Function
Number
Function Correlation
Coefficient
Significance
1 Assisting students in selecting high school
courses.
.765 .000*
3 Providing information about individual
students to colleges at which the student has
applied.
.938 .000*
5 Counseling with students concerning
academic failures.
.572 .000*
6 Counseling with potential dropouts. .440 .000*
7 Counseling with students concerning
learning difficulties.
.644 .000*
8 Counseling with students concerning
military service.
.801 .000*
9 Counseling with students in regard to
educational and vocational plans.
.757 .000*
10 Providing the student an opportunity to
“talk through his problems.”
.658 .000*
11 Counseling with professional staff in regard
to school problems.
.800 .000*
12 Counseling with students concerning
personal decisions.
.866 .000*
13 Evaluating students’ adjustment to school
environment.
.592 .000*
14 Conducting follow-up studies of students
counseled by guidance personnel.
.546 .000*
15 Evaluating student adjustment to curriculum .863 .000*
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 77/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 78/120
checking credits for graduation and college entrance (p = .462). Counselors’ perceptions
and expectations of this function are in agreement about whether or not this is being
done or should be done.
The other 28 functions were significant (p < .05). The 28 functions have a
positive correlation between the high school counselors’ perceptions and expectations.
This suggests that high school counselors are not in agreement about the functions they
perceive themselves performing and the functions they expect themselves to perform.
There is a statistically significant difference between their reported actions, and what
they think their actions should be.
Research Question 2
Is there a significant correlation between high school principals’ perceptions and
expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
Ho2: There is no statistically significant correlation between high school principals’
perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) scores as it
relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
To answer the question a bivariate correlation analysis using Pearson r was run at the
p = .05 level. Table 2 lists the functions from the CFI as they relate to the ASCA
standards. The functions listed are numbered to reflect the numbering from the survey.
Included are the correlation coefficient and the p level generated from the CFI scores of
high school principals. Correlation statistically significant at p < .05 are indicated by an
asterisk.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 79/120
TABLE 2
Principals’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards *=significance
Function
Number
Function Correlation
Coefficient
Significance
1 Assisting students in selecting high school
courses.
.793 .000*
3 Providing information about individual
students to colleges at which the student has
applied.
.899 .000*
5 Counseling with students concerning
academic failures.
.552 .000*
6 Counseling with potential dropouts. .649 .000*
7 Counseling with students concerning
learning difficulties.
.753 .000*
8 Counseling with students concerning
military service.
.940 .000*
9 Counseling with students in regard to
educational and vocational plans.
.792 .000*
10 Providing the student an opportunity to
“talk through his problems.”
.403 .000*
11 Counseling with professional staff in regard
to school problems.
.784 .000*
12 Counseling with students concerning
personal decisions.
.752 .000*
13 Evaluating students’ adjustment to school .716 .000*
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 80/120
Principals’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards *=significance
environment.14 Conducting follow-up studies of students
counseled by guidance personnel.
.637 .000*
15 Evaluating student adjustment to curriculum
choices.
.185 .500
17 Planning orientation activities for entering
freshmen.
.779 .000*
19 Scheduling new students. .414 .000*
20 Conducting follow-up of new students to
determine adjustment to school
environment.
.173 .066
21 Conducting follow-up of new students to
determine academic adjustment to school.
.069 .470
24 Planning case conferences involving parents
and teachers.
.705 .000*
25 Checking credits for graduation and college
entrance.
.461 .462
26 Writing letters of reference. .969 .000*
27 Providing occupational information. .617 .000*
28 Providing college information. .903 .000*29 Providing information concerning study
habits.
.781 .000*
30 Providing information concerning personal
and social needs.
.824 .000*
32 Providing information on community
referral resources.
.829 .000*
33 Assisting students with vocational plans. .780 .000*34 Assisting students with college plans. .829 .000*
40 Compiling faculty newsletter pertaining to .905 .000*
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 81/120
Principals’ Perceptions and Expectations on ASCA standards *=significance
school program.42 Planning assembly programs. .720 .000*
Of the 42 functions on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI), 29 of them were
congruent with the ASCA standards. Four of the 29 functions was not significant;
evaluating student adjustment to curriculum choices (p = .500), conducting follow-up of
new students to determine adjustment to school environment (p = .066), conducting
follow-up of new students to determine academic adjustment to school (p = .470), and
checking credits for graduation and college entrance (p = .462). Principals’ perceptions
and expectations of these functions are in agreement about whether or not they are being
done or should be done.
The other 25 were significant (p < .05). The 25 functions have a positive
correlation between the high school principals’ perceptions and expectations. This
suggests that high school principals are virtually not in agreement about the functions
they perceive counselors are performing and the functions they expect them to perform.
There is a statistically significant difference between the reported actions, and what they
think the actions should be.
To answer questions three and four an independent sample t-test was run at the
p = .05 level with the CFI scores as the dependent variables. Due to the fact that
statements are equal in their impact on a respondent’s total score, total scale scores were
used in determining the expectation scores (Huck, 2000). The total scale score for each
counselor and principal was calculated by adding all the item scores on the CFI. The
assumption was that the Likert scale had values that were evenly spaced on the scale.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 82/120
The continuous scores were totaled to give a total scale score because the values range
from high to low (Gall, Gall, & Borg, 2007). By assuming that the data were evenly
spaced, it is also assumed that the data is interval. According to Thompson (2006) many
statisticians postulate that Likert scale data should be treated as interval data because the
data is being used to approximate scaled data.
Research Question 3
Is there a significant difference between high school counselors’ and principals’
expectation total scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the
American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards?
Ho3: There is no statistically significant difference between high school
counselors’ and principals’ expectation scores on the Counselor Function Inventory
(CFI) as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) standards.
In this study, it was hypothesized that there is no significant difference between
high school counselors’ and principals’ expectation scores on the Counselor Function
Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA)
standards. For equal variances assumed (p = .809), group statistics and t-test result for
expectations indicate the following:
TABLE 3
Group Statistics
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 83/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 84/120
Ho4: There is no statistically significant difference between high school
counselors’ and principals’ perception scores on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI)
as it relates to the American School Counselor (ASCA) standards.
In this study, it was hypothesized that there is no significant difference between
high school counselors’ and principals’ perception scores on the Counselor Function
Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA)
standards. For equal variances assumed (p = .757), group statistics and t-test result for
perceptions indicate the following:
TABLE 5
Group Statistics
Perceptions N Mean Mean Difference Std. Error
Difference
Counselors 136 57.82 13.837 1.186
Principals 113 63.79 13.766 1.295
TABLE 6
Counselor and Principal Perceptions
t df Sig.(2-tailed) Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
3.394 247 .001 5.964 1.757
There is a statistically significant difference (t = 3.39, p < .05) between high
school counselors’ perception scores and principals’ perception scores; therefore, the
null is rejected. This would suggest that high school counselors and high school
principals do not agree on the functions that high school counselors are actually
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 85/120
performing. It appears high school counselors and principals have varying opinions on
the perceived job duties of high school counselors and they are not agreed upon.
Research Question 5
What are the most important functions of the high school counselor as perceived
by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standards?
At the end of the survey participants ranked 10 statements from the inventory,
from most important to least important, that are most relevant to the position of a high
school counselor at a 5A high school in Texas. In the top 10 listings, only one was not in
agreement with the national standards; the eleventh option was in agreement with the
ASCA standards. Scheduling students in classes was ranked as the ninth most important
function for a school counselor but is not congruent with ASCA standards.
Table 5 reflects the most important functions of the school counselor as
perceived by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA standard. The
response percentage was determined by total number of rankings, divided by total
rankings possible, and then multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 86/120
TABLE 5
The most important functions based on the ASCA standards *=significance
Function Response Percentage
1. Assisting students in selecting high school courses. 80.3%2. Providing the student an opportunity to “talk though his
problems.”
79.1%
3. Counseling with potential dropouts. 71.5%4. Counseling with students concerning academic failures. 69.9%
5. Counseling with students in regard to educational and
vocational plans.
61.0%
6. Checking credits for graduation and college entrance. 60.6%
7. Counseling with students concerning personal
decisions.
54.6%
8. Providing college information. 41.0%
9. Assisting students with college plans. 34.5%10. Scheduling new students. 30.1%
Assisting students in selecting high school courses was ranked as the most
important function performed by a high school counselor. This was determined by high
school principals and counselors; with a score of 80.3% Scheduling new students was
ranked as the least important function performed by high school counselors from the CFI
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 87/120
by high school principals and counselors. The percentage of principals and counselors
that determined this ranking is 30.1%.
Summary
High school counselors and principals do not agree among themselves about the
functions counselors should be performing and actually perform. High school counselors
and principals agree with each other about the functions counselors should be
performing. However, high school counselors and principals are in disagreement about
the functions counselors are actually performing. In response to the fifth research
question, principals and counselors listed their perceptions of the 10 most important
functions of a high school counselor in Texas that are congruent with the national
standards. Chapter V offers a summary of research, summary of findings, implications,
applications, conclusions, and recommendations for future research.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 88/120
CHAPTER V
Summary, Conclusions, Recommendations
This chapter is comprised of six sections: summary of research, summary of
findings, implications, applications, conclusions, and recommendations for future
research. An overview of the study, a review of the statistical analysis, conclusions
based on the findings for each question, the implications of the results, applications for
findings, and suggestions for future research will be presented.
Summary of Research
The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of high school
principals and high school counselors about the role of the high school counselor. The
research questions were answered through the responses of Texas 5A high school
principals and counselors from the modified CFI; the response rate was 51.66%. The
significance of the study was to indicate the agreement, or disagreement, between high
school principals and counselors regarding the functions that counselors should perform
in relation to the ASCA standards. A better understanding will allow for a more
collaborative effort in developing, and implementing, a comprehensive school guidance
and counseling program.
Summary of Findings
Research Question 1: There is a statistically significant correlation between high
school counselors’ perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory
(CFI) scores as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA)
standards.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 89/120
Of the 42 functions on the Counselor Function Inventory (CFI), 29 of them were
congruent with the ASCA standards. Twenty-eight of the 29 functions were significant
(p < .05). The function that was not significant was checking credits for graduation and
college entrance (p = .462). These results indicate that high school counselors are not in
agreement with each other about the functions that are actually being performed and the
functions that should be performed at work. All of the functions tested are congruent
with the national standards and it is possible to infer that counselors are unclear about
which functions ASCA has specified to promote a comprehensive school guidance and
counseling program. The results from this study may be an indicator of what Bemak and
Chung (2008) found counselors want to please those they work with that they tend to
back away from roles that may cause conflict on the campus. If the counselors’ roles are
not clearly defined, much confusion and dissention can set in. According to Scarborough
& Culbreth (2008) experience also plays a part of what counselors do and should do.
Nelson, Robles-Pina, and Nichter (2008) found that counselors with 10 or more years
experience have a better understanding of nationally defined expectations. Younger
counselors may cause the disagreement about the counselors’ role on a campus if they
are not familiar with ASCA.
Research Question 2: There is a statistically significant correlation between high
school principals’ perceptions and expectations on the Counselor Function Inventory
(CFI) scores as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA)
standards.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 90/120
Twenty-five of the 29 functions were significant (p < .05). The four functions
that were not significant were: evaluating student adjustment to curriculum choices (p = .
500), conducting follow-up of new students to determine adjustment to school
environment (p = .066), conducting follow-up of new students to determine academic
adjustment to school (p = .470), and checking credits for graduation and college entrance
(p = .462). High school principals are not in agreement with each other about the
functions that counselors should be doing and actually are doing at work. These
standards are all congruent with ASCA.
Principals may not agree about the functions of a high school counselor because
they may be unfamiliar with the expectations and perceptions of the national standards.
Opinions of the counselor’s role may vary due to the everyday needs of the individual
campus (Kirchner & Setchfield, 2005). Disagreement can also be based upon individual
duties. Some duties may be deemed more important than others. Amatea and Clark
(2005) found that the disagreements between principals could possibly come in many
forms. Some principals do not agree with the value of the work responsibilities. The
varying opinions may come regarding the duties as a whole or individually depending on
the situation.
Research Question 3: There is no statistically significant difference between high
school counselors’ and principals’ expectations scores on the Counselor Function
Inventory (CFI) as it relates to the American School Counselor Association (ASCA)
standards. High school counselors and principals agree about the functions that high
school counselors should be performing.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 91/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 92/120
that the most effective way for counselors to fulfill duties is to have a collaborative
relationship with the principal. When the principal has gained the knowledge and
understanding of the importance of the ASCA guidelines, the likelihood of the standards
being met increases. In another study conducted by Amatea and Clark (2005) it was
found that principals agree about the responsibilities of the counselor, but not the priority
those duties are given. This too, can cause turmoil between counselors and principals.
Research Question 5: What are the most important functions of the high school
counselor as perceived by the high school principal and counselor based on the ASCA
standards?
When principals and counselors were asked to list the top 10 most important
functions a counselor should perform, the first nine listings were all congruent with the
ASCA standards. Scheduling students in classes was listed as the ninth most important
function of a counselor, but is not congruent with the ASCA standards. The eleventh
function listed was also congruent with ASCA. As a reminder, the first nine functions
are listed and the eleventh function is listed as number ten:
1. Assisting student in selecting high school courses.
2. Providing the student an opportunity to “talk through his problems.”
3. Counseling with potential dropouts.
4. Counseling with students concerning academic failures.
5. Counseling with students in regard to educational and vocational plans.
6. Checking credits for graduation and college entrance.
7. Counseling with students concerning personal decisions.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 93/120
8. Providing college information.
9. Assisting students with college plans.
10. Scheduling new students.
This leads to the belief that principals and counselors know what functions
counselors should be performing that are congruent with national standards. High school
principals and counselors knowing the role of the counselor in terms of national
standards is very positive and makes it easier for schools and districts to implement a
comprehensive guidance and counselor program. To have a better understanding of the
school counselors’ role, principals needs to embrace a complete comprehensive school
guidance and counseling program (McGlothin & Miller, 2008).
Implications
Maser’s 1971 study in Seattle, Washington revealed high agreement among
groups and between pairs of secondary principals, counselors, and teachers. These
groups share similar perceptions of the counselors’ functions. All groups demonstrated
agreement regarding the role of the school counselor.
As in Maser’s study, Johnson’s 1989 Florida study a high level of agreement was
found between what principals perceive counselors do and what they expect counselors
should do, and between what principals expect counselors should do and what
counselors expect counselors should do. A high level of agreement was also found
between what principals perceive counselors do and what counselors perceive
counselors do, and between what counselors perceive counselors do and what counselors
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 94/120
expect counselors should do. Basically, there seems to be similar opinion between, and
among, principals and counselors concerning job functions of the school counselor.
As in both studies done by Maser (1971) and Johnson (1989), Moore’s 1997
study in Southwestern Indiana found a high level of agreement between principals and
counselors for each of the four comparisons, which are: principal perception-counselor
perception, principal expectation-counselor expectation, principal perception-principal
expectation, and counselor perception-counselor expectation. Principals and counselors
tend to agree among themselves and with each other regarding the job duties of the
counselor.
According to role theory (Kahn et al., 1964), counselors must know what is
expected in order to perform job duties. When counselors are uncertain about job
expectations and perceptions, they too will find themselves not agreeing. The
disagreement principals have amongst themselves about the functions of the counselor
may stem from misunderstanding of how counselors’ education and the expectations set
forth by ASCA. Principals have varying opinions on what counselors’ duties entail.
Therefore, counselors may develop job survival skills to avoid conflict as well as
frustration with their job. Given that the job duties are unclear, counselors have
conformed to the role that principals expect in order to find job satisfaction. Given how
counselors are trained and the guidelines created by ASCA detail the counselors’ job
role, most campuses do not use counselors to the initial intent of the position. Many
counselors find themselves bogged down with schedule changes and paperwork; not a
lot of counseling. One might wonder if more individual counseling was happening
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 95/120
would the achievement gap be impacted. Since principals steer the campus, they drive
the duties of the counselors and counseling programs. Without proper knowledge of
national and state expectations, counselors are not used to their full potential and
students are not served to the fullest capacity.
Applications
Implementing a complete comprehensive school guidance and counseling
program can enhance the academics on a high school campus. It is possible to raise
achievement if counseling students is done with research-based strategies (Webb et al.,
2005). There is disagreement among and between counselors and principals regarding
the functions that should be performed and are actually performed. Counselors and
principals finding agreement on the expectations of what should be done on a daily basis
most likely comes from the practical issues a campus must perform daily. It is
imperative for counselors and principals to come to a place where they agree with each
other about the duties of the high school counselor and how the national standards are
involved. ASCA has outlined steps for states to use as a reference in creating a complete
comprehensive guidance and counseling program. High school principals and counselors
should come together, with standards in hand, to create a guidance and counseling
program that is appropriate according to state and national guidelines and increases
student achievement. It is also imperative that an accountability system is put into place
to ensure the program is working, and to keep counselors working in the most efficient
way. In order for principals to support the role of the counselor there must be clarity and
understanding of the role, as well as trust and communication (Ponec & Brock, 2000).
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 96/120
Conclusions
Neither counselors nor principals are in agreement regarding the functions that
are set forth by ASCA. With both of these groups having varying opinions, it would be
easy to understand the difficulty is defining a counselor’s role. These disconnects can
cause role confusion for high school counselors. The principal is responsible for running
a campus and this includes the duties of the counselor. Counselors and principals agree
with what counselors should be doing, but not with what they actually do. Referring to
the ASCA standards may alleviate some of the gaps for what a counselor should do and
actually do on a campus. It is imperative for principals to have communication with
counselors regarding campus expectations and perceptions.
Lastly, principals and counselors rated functions that were most important to
least important that were congruent with the national standards, demonstrating an
understanding from both parties about the role of the high school counselor. Campus
principals need to involve their counselors when making decisions regarding the
guidance and counseling program. Ideally, working together will allow for a more
collaborative relationship and increase communication. With increased communication
counselor job duties can be more clearly defined. Clarity will reduce job anxiety giving
counselors a sense of purpose. In the end, the goal of the campus is to increase student
performance by enhancing the guidance and counseling program.
Recommendations for Future Research
Recommendations for future studies include:
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 97/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 98/120
Agresta, J. (2004). Professional role perceptions of school social workers, psychologists,
and counselors. Children and School, 26 , 151-163. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Aluede, O., & Imonikhe, J. S. (2002). Secondary school students' and teachers'
perceptions of the role of the school counselor. Guidance and Counseling, 17 ,
46-50. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Amatea, E. S., & Clark, M. A. (2005). Changing schools, changing counselors: A
qualitative study of school administrators' conceptions of the school counselor
role. Professional School Counselor, 9, 16-27. Retrieved from
http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/Journals
Amatea, E. S., & West-Olatunji, C. A. (2007). Joining the conversation about educating
our poorest children: Emerging leadership roles for school counselors in high-
poverty schools. Professional School Counselor, 11, 81-89. Retrieved from
http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/Journals
American School Counselor Association. (1967). Counselor Function Inventory (CFI).
School Counselor, 15, 130-133.
American School Counselor Association (2003, February). The ASCA National Model:
A framework for school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling,
3, 165-168. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
American School Counselor Association (2004). The role of the professional school
counselor . Retrieved http://www.schoolcounselor.org
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 99/120
Beesley, D. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of school counselor effectiveness:
collaborating for student success. Education, 125, 259-270. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Bemak, F., & Chung, R. C.-Y. (2008). New professional roles and advocacy strategies
for school counselors: A multicultural/social justice perspective to move beyond
the nice counselor syndrome. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86, 372-
382.
Brewer, J. (1932). Education as guidance. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Brigman, G., & Campbell, C. (2003). Helping students improve academic achievement
and school success behavior. Professional School Counseling, 7 , 91-98.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Burnham, J. J., & Jackson, C. M. (2000). School counselor roles: Discrepancies between
actual practice and existing models. Professional School Counseling, 4, 41-49.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Carey, J., Harrity, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2005). The development of a self-assessment
instrument to measure a school district's readiness to implement the ASCA
National Model. Professional School Counseling, 8, 305-312. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Chata, C. C., & Loesch, L. C. (2007). Future school principals' views of the roles of
professional school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 11, 35-41.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 100/120
Clark, M. A., & Amatea, E. (2004). Teacher perceptions and expectations of school
counselor contributions: Implications for program planning and training.
Professional School Counseling , 8, 132-140. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Coll, K. M., & Freeman, B. (1997). Role conflict among elementary school counselors:
A national comparison with middle and secondary school counselors.
Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 31, 251-261. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Coll, K. M., & Rice, R. L. (1993). Role conflict among community college counselors.
Community College Review, 21, 58-65. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Curry, J., & Lambie, G.W. (2007). Enhancing school counselor accountability: The large
group guidance portfolio. Professional School Counseling, 11, 145-148.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Dahir, C., Burnham, J., & Stone, C. (2009). Listen to the voices: School counselors and
comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling, 12,
182-192. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Dahir, C., & Stone, C. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E of the impact school
counselors have on student achievement. Professional School Counseling, 6,
214-221. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Dahir, C., & Stone, C. (2009). School counselor accountability: The path to social justice
and systemic change. Journal of Counseling and Development, 87, 12-20.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 101/120
Dollarhide, C. T., Smith, A. T., & Lemberger, M. E. (2007). Critical incidents in the
development of supportive principals: Facilitating school counselor-principal
relationships. Professional School Counseling, 10, 360-369. Retrieved from
http://wilsonweb.com
Eschenauer, R., & Chen-Hayes, S. F. (2005). The transformative individual school
counseling model: An accountability model for urban school counselors.
Professional School Counseling, 8, 244-248. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Falls, L. & Nichter, M. (2007). High school counselor's lived experiences of burnout: A
phenomenological study. Professional School Counseling, 5, 47-55. Retrieved
from http://www.jsc.montana.edu/articles/v5n13.pdf.
Fitch, T., Newby, E., Ballestero, V., & Marshall, J. L. (2001). Counselor preparation:
Future school administrators' perceptions of the school counselor's role.
[Electronic version]. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 89-99.
Foster, L. H., Young, J. S., & Hermann, M. (2005). The work activities of professional
school counselors: Are the national standards being addressed? Professional
School Counseling, 8, 313-321. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research (8th ed.). Boston,
MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Ginter, E. J. (2002). Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD) and counseling's
interwoven nature: Achieving a more complete understanding of the present
through "historization" (musings of an exiting editor-an editorial postscript).
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 102/120
Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 219-222. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Gladding, S. T. (2000). Counseling a comprehensive profession (4th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2000). Developing and managing your school
guidance program (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing changes: Patterns, principles, and
potholes, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Herr, E. L. (2003). Historical roots and future issues. In B. T. Erford (Ed.),
Transforming the school counseling profession (21-38). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merrill Prentice Hall.
Holcomb-McCoy, C. & Mitchell, N. (2005). A descriptive study of urban school
counseling programs. Professional School Counselor, 8, 203-208. Retrieved
from EBSCOHost database.
Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York, NY:
Longman, Inc.
Isaacs, M. L. (2003). Data-driven decision making: The engine of accountability.
Professional School Counseling, 6 , 288-295. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Johnson, T. H. (1989). An analysis of senior high school guidance counselor role
perceptions and expectations by high school principals and guidance counselors
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 103/120
in Florida school districts (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 8917455).
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational stress:
Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Kaplan, L. S. (1995). Principals versus counselors: Resolving tensions from different
practice models. School Counselor, 42, 261-267. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Kirchner, G. L., & Setchfield, M. S. (2005). School counselors' and school principals'
perceptions of the school counselor's role. [Electronic version]. Education, 126 ,
10-16.
Knapper, E. Q. (1978). Counselor accountability. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 126 ,
27-30.
Leuwerke, W. C., Walker, J., & Shi, Q. (2009). Informing principals: The impact of
different types of information on principals' perceptions of professional school
counselors. Professional School Counselor, 12, 263-271.
Levitt, D. H., & Jacques, J. D. (2005). Promoting tolerance for ambiguity in counselor
training programs. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and
Development, 44, 46-54. Retrieved from
http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/Journals
Lieberman, A. (2004). Confusion regarding school counselor functions: School
leadership impacts role clarity. Education, 124, 552-558.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 104/120
Maser, A. L. (1971). Counselor function in secondary schools. The School Counselor,
12, 367-372.
McGlothlin, J. M., & Miller, L. G. (2008). Hiring effective secondary school counselors.
NASSP Bulletin, 92, 61-72.
Monteiro-Leitner, J., Asner-Self, K. K., Milde, C., Leitner, D. W., & Skelton, D. (2006).
The role of the rural school counselor: Counselor, counselor-in-training, and
principal perceptions. Professional School Counseling, 9, 248-251. Retrieved
from EBSCOHost database.
Moore, L. G. (1997). An analysis of existing and ideal guidance counselor roles as
perceived by high school principals and counselors in southwestern Indiana
(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
database (UMI No. 9724573).
Myrick, R. D. (2003). Accountability: Counselors count. Professional School
Counseling, 6 , 174-179. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003, August). High school guidance and
counseling . Retrieved from
http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2003015/3.asp
Nelson, J., Robles-Pina, R., & Nichter, M. (2008). An analysis of Texas high school
counselors' roles: actual and preferred counseling activities. Journal of
Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory and Research, 36 (1), 30-46..
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 105/120
Otwell, P.S., & Mullis, F. (1997). Academic achievement and counselor accountability.
Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 31, 343-348. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Perrone, K. M., Webb, L. K., & Blalock, R. H. (2005). The effects of role congruence
and role conflict on work, marital, and life satisfaction. Journal of Career
Development, 31, 225-238. Retrieved from
http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/Journals
Pérusse, R., Goodnough, G. E., Donegan, J., & Jones, C. (2004). Perceptions of school
counselors and school principals about the national standards for school
counseling programs and the transforming school counseling initiative.
Professional School Counseling, 7 , 152-161. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Ponec, D. L., & Brock, B. L. (2000). Relationships among elementary school counselors
and principals: A unique bond. Professional School Counseling, 3, 208-217.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost Academic Search Premier database.
Pope, M., & Sveinsdottir, M. (2005). Frank, we hardly knew ye: The very personal side
of Frank Parsons. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 105-115.
Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Poynton, T. A., Schumacher, R. A., & Wilczenski, F. L. (2008). School counselors’
attitudes regarding statewide comprehensive developmental guidance model
implementation. Professional School Counseling, 11, 417-422. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 106/120
Ribak-Rosenthal, N. (1994). Reasons individuals become school administrators, school
counselors, and teachers. School Counselor, 41, 158-160. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
Ritz, J. (2006). Technology and engineering are both addressed through technology
education. The Technology Teacher, 66 , 19-21. Retrieved from EBSCOHost
database.
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in
complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163. Retrieved
from http://www.jstor.org
Ross, W., & Herrington, D. (2005-2006). A comparative study of pre-professional
counselor/principal perceptions of the role of the counselor in public schools.
National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal-
Electronic, 23. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com
Sabella, R. A. (2006). The ASCA national school counseling research center: A brief
history and agenda. Professional School Counseling, 9, 412-415.
Scarborough, J. L., & Culbreth, J. R. (2002). Examining discrepancies between actual
and preferred practice of school counselors. Journal of Counseling and
Development, 86 , 446-459.
Schwallie-Giddis, P., ter Maat, M., & Pak, M. (2003). Initiating leadership by
introducing and implementing the ASCA National Model. Professional School
Counseling , 6 (3), 170-174. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 107/120
Shumake, G. F., & Oelke, M. C. (1967). Counselor function inventory. The School
Counselor, 15, 130-133.
Sink, C. A., & Spencer, L. R. (2007). Teacher version of the my class inventory-short
form: An accountability tool for elementary school counselors. Professional
School Counseling, 11, 129-139. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
19 Tex. Admin. Code § 239.15 (2009).
Texas Counseling Association (TCA) (2004). A model comprehensive, developmental
guidance and counseling program for Texas public schools: A guide for program
development pre-k—12th grade. Austin, TX. Texas Education Agency (TEA).
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 11.202(a) (Thompson/West 2007).
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §33.005 (Thomson/West 2007).
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §33.007 (Thomson/West 2007).
Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics an insight-based approach.
New York, NY. The Guliford Press.
University Interscholastic League (2007). Official alignments and reclassification
information. Retrieved from http://www.uil.utexas.edu/2007align/index.html
Vernon, M., Bussey, P., & Day, D. (1979). The “closure system” and accountability in
vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 4, 45-47.
Walsh, M. E., Barrett, J. G., & DePaul, J. (2007). Day-to-day activities of school
counselors: Alignment with new directions in the field and the ASCA National
Model. Professional School Counseling, 4, 370-378. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 108/120
Webb, L. D., Brigman, G. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Linking school counselors and
student success: A replication of the student success skills approach targeting the
academic social competence of students. Professional School Counseling, 8, 407-
413. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
White, F. (2007). The Professional School Counselor's Challenge: Accountability.
Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory and Research, 35(2), 62-
70. Retrieved from EBSCOHost database.
Zalaquett, C. P. (2005). Principals' perceptions of elementary school counselors' role and
functions. Professional School Counseling, 8, 451-457. Retrieved from
EBSCOHost database
APPENDIXES
APPENDIX A ORIGINAL “COUNSELOR FUNCTION INVENTORY”
Shumake, G. F., & Oelke, M. C. (1967). Counselor function inventory. The School Counselor 15. 130-133.
DIRECTIONS: Respond to each of the following items by writing in the number 1, 2, 3,4, or 5 as described here.
1—The counselor should personally perform this function.
2—The counselor should have primary responsibility for this function, although he may
not personally perform the function.3—The counselor should share with other groups in planning and performing this
function, but he does not have primary responsibility for function.
4—The counselor should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.5—The counselor should have no direct responsibility for this function.
_____1. Assisting student in selecting high school courses. _____2. Scheduling students in classes.
_____3. Placing students in part-time and summer jobs.
_____4. Placing students in permanent jobs.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 109/120
_____5. Arranging course transfers for students within the school.
_____6. Providing information about individual students to potential employers. _____7. Providing information about individual students to colleges at which the student
has applied.
_____8. Making the decisions concerning special grouping of students. _____9. Assisting student in the selection of extra-curricular activities.
____10. Sending and receiving transcripts to and from other high schools.
____11. Counseling with students concerning academic failures. ____12. Counseling with potential dropouts.
____13. Counseling with students in evaluating personal assets and limitations.
____14. Counseling with students concerning learning difficulties.
____15. Counseling with students in their development of special abilities. ____16. Counseling with students concerning discrepancy between ambitions and
abilities.
____17. Counseling with students concerning military service.
____18. Counseling with students in regard to educational and vocational plans. ____19. Providing the student an opportunity to “talk through his problems.”
____20. Counseling with professional staff in regard to school problems. ____21. Counseling with students concerning personal decisions.
____22. Conducting follow-up studies of graduates.
____23. Conducting follow-up studies of dropouts. ____24. Evaluating students’ adjustment to school environment.
____25. Evaluating student achievement as compared to capacity.
____26. Evaluating effectiveness of extra-curricular activities in meeting student needs.
____27. Conducting follow-up studies of students counseled by guidance personnel. ____28. Evaluating student adjustment to curriculum choices.
____29. Preparing an analysis of grades given each year by faculty. ____30. Evaluating effectiveness of school curriculum in meeting students’ academic
and social needs.
____31. Conducting follow-up studies to consider effectiveness of homework.
____32. Planning orientation activities for entering freshmen. ____33. Registering new students.
____34. Planning orientation for students transferring from another high school.
____35. Conducting orientation conferences for new teachers.
____36. Scheduling new students. ____37. Preparing handbook of school rules and policies for distribution.
____38. Conducting follow-up of new students to determine adjustment to school
environment. ____39. Conducting follow-up of new students to determine academic adjustment to
school.
____40. Maintaining permanent records. ____41. Organizing school testing program.
____42. Administering standardization tests.
____43. Organizing the use of test results by faculty and administration.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 110/120
____44. Identifying exceptional children.
____45. Visiting homes to confer with parents. ____46. Planning case conferences involving parents and teachers.
____47. Conducting a study of a student’s out-of-school experiences.
____48. Assisting teachers in diagnosing learning difficulties of students. ____49. Administering the program for reporting pupil progress to parents.
____50. Checking credits for graduation and college entrance.
____51. Writing letters of reference. ____52. Accumulating personality data on students.
____53. Providing occupational information.
____54. Providing college information.
____55. Providing information concerning study habits. ____56. Providing information concerning personal and social needs.
____57. Providing scholarship information.
____58. Providing information on child labor laws and work permits.
____59. Providing information on economic conditions related to future employmentand education.
____60. Providing information on community referral resources. ____61. Assisting students with vocational plans.
____62. Assisting students with college plans.
____63. Teaching courses on occupational development. ____64. Conducting community surveys to determine occupational opportunities.
____65. Planning college night programs.
____66. Planning career day programs.
____67. Coordinating the school audio-visual service. ____68. Making decisions concerning student disciplinary action.
____69. Teaching academic courses other than group guidance courses. ____70. Selecting and revising curriculum content. ____71. Working with students who are delinquent in attendance.
____72. Coordinating remedial work for students.
____73. Planning PTA activities and programs. ____74. Compiling faculty newsletter pertaining to school program.
____75. Ordering school supplies and equipment.
____76. Preparing school information for distribution to public communication media.
____77. Planning assembly programs.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 111/120
APPENDIX B – MODIFIED “COUNSELOR FUNCTION INVENTORY”
Please record your appropriate rating of the counselor role or function using the
following rating criteria for Column A and Column B. DIRECTIONS: Respond to each of the following items by writing in the number 1, 2, 3,
4, or 5 in Column A and Column B as described here. Each of the 42 items should berated in both Column A and Column B.
“Does”=the actual functions the school counselor is performing.
“Should Do”=the functions the school counselor should perform.
1-The counselor does/should personally perform this function.2-The counselor does/should have primary responsibility for this function, although he
may not personally perform the function.
3-The counselor does/should share with other groups in planning and performing thisfunction, but he does not have primary responsibility for function.
4-The counselor does/should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.
5-The counselor does/should have no direct responsibility for this function.
“Does” “Should Do”
Column A Column B
_________ 1. Assisting student in selecting high school courses. __________
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 112/120
_________ 2. Scheduling students in classes. ___________
___ 3. Providing information about individual students to _____
colleges at which the student has applied.
_________ 4. Sending and receiving transcripts to and from other ___________
high schools.
_________ 5. Counseling with students concerning academic ___________
failures.
_________ 6. Counseling with potential dropouts. ___________
_________ 7. Counseling with students concerning learning ___________
difficulties.
_________ 8. Counseling with students concerning military service. ___________
_________ 9. Counseling with students in regard to educational ___________
and vocational plans.
1-The counselor does/should personally perform this function.2-The counselor does/should have primary responsibility for this function, although he
may not personally perform the function.
3-The counselor does/should share with other groups in planning and performing thisfunction, but he does not have primary responsibility for function.
4-The counselor does/should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.5-The counselor does/should have no direct responsibility for this function.
“Does” “Should Do”
Column A COLUMN B
_________ 10. Providing the student an opportunity to “talk ___________
through his problems.”
_________ 11. Counseling with professional staff in regard to ___________
school problems.
_________ 12. Counseling with students concerning personal ___________
decisions.
_________ 13. Evaluating students’ adjustment to school ___________ environment.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 113/120
_________ 14. Conducting follow-up studies of students counseled ___________
by guidance personnel.
_________ 15. Evaluating student adjustment to curriculum choices. ___________
_________ 16. Evaluating effectiveness of school curriculum in ___________
meeting students’ academic and social needs.
_________ 17. Planning orientation activities for entering freshmen. ___________
_________ 18. Registering new students. ___________
_________ 19. Scheduling new students. ___________
_________ 20. Conducting follow-up of new students to determine ___________
adjustment to school environment.
_________ 21. Conducting follow-up of new students to determine ___________ academic adjustment to school.
_________ 22. Organizing school testing program. ___________
1-The counselor does/should personally perform this function.2-The counselor does/should have primary responsibility for this function, although he
may not personally perform the function.
3-The counselor does/should share with other groups in planning and performing thisfunction, but he does not have primary responsibility for function.
4-The counselor does/should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.5-The counselor does/should have no direct responsibility for this function.
“Does” “Should Do”
Column A COLUMN B
_________ 23. Administering standardization tests. ___________
_________ 24. Planning case conferences involving parents and ___________ teachers.
_________ 25. Checking credits for graduation and college entrance. ___________
_________ 26. Writing letters of reference. ___________
_________ 27. Providing occupational information. ___________
_________ 28. Providing college information. ___________
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 114/120
_________ 29. Providing information concerning study habits. ___________
_________ 30. Providing information concerning personal and ___________
social needs.
_________ 31. Providing scholarship information. ___________
_________ 32. Providing information on community referral ___________
resources.
_________ 33. Assisting students with vocational plans. ___________
_________ 34. Assisting students with college plans. ___________
_________ 35. Planning college night programs. ___________
_________ 36. Planning career day programs. ___________
_________ 37. Making decisions concerning student discipline. ___________
1-The counselor does/should personally perform this function.2-The counselor does/should have primary responsibility for this function, although he
may not personally perform the function.
3-The counselor does/should share with other groups in planning and performing thisfunction, but he does not have primary responsibility for function.
4-The counselor does/should serve as a consultant in this function only upon request.5-The counselor does/should have no direct responsibility for this function.
“Does” “Should Do”
Column A COLUMN B
_________ 38. Teaching academic courses other than group ___________
guidance courses.
_________ 39. Working with students who are delinquent in ___________
attendance.
_________ 40. Compiling faculty newsletter pertaining to school ___________
program.
_________ 41. Ordering school supplies and equipment. ___________
_________ 42. Planning assembly programs. ___________
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 115/120
List ten statements from this inventory, from most important to least important, that youthink are most relevant to the position of a high school counselor.
1. _________________________________________________________________ 2. _________________________________________________________________
3. _________________________________________________________________
4. _________________________________________________________________ 5. _________________________________________________________________
6. _________________________________________________________________
7. _________________________________________________________________
8. _________________________________________________________________ 9. _________________________________________________________________
10. _________________________________________________________________
Position____________________________
School_____________________________
APPENDIX C – PRINCIPAL/COUNSELOR INSTRUCTION LETTER
Dear Principal/Counselor,
It is an absolute pleasure for me to contact you. My name is Desiree Skinner, and I am aPhD student in educational leadership at Prairie View A&M University/Member of theTexas A&M University System.
I am conducting research for a doctoral dissertation. I am investigating the difference in perception between high school principals and high school counselors about the role of
high school counselors.
Your prompt response to my survey is very important to my collecting data for mydissertation. All of your answers will be kept confidential and only used in my study.
Once I receive the consent form back I will email you with a link to SurveyMonkey.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at: 979-324-7582. You
may also email me at: [email protected].
Thank you very much for your time and help.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 116/120
Sincerely,
Desiree A. Skinner
PhD Student in Educational LeadershipPrairie View A&M University
Whitelowe R. Green College of Education
Prairie View, Texas 77446Counselor
Bryan Independent School District
William Allan Kritsonis, PhDProfessor and Dissertation Chair
PhD Program in Educational Leadership
Whitlowe R. Green College of Education
Prairie View A&M UniversityThe Texas A&M University System
Prairie View, Texas 77446
APPENDIX D - CONSENT FORM
HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELORS’ ROLES AS PERCEIVED BY HIGH SCHOOL
PRINCIPALS AND COUNSELORS IN TEXAS
You are invited to be in a research study of the perceptions of high school principals and
high school counselors about the role of high school counselors. You were selected as a possible participant because all head principals and lead counselors (or the counselor with the most experience) in Texas 5A high schools were chosen. We ask that you read
this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the study.
This study is being conducted by: Desiree A. Skinner, PhD Student in Educational
Leadership at Prairie View University.
Background Information
The purpose of this study is: to describe the perceptions of high school principals and
high school counselors about the role of high school counselors. The research questions
will address the functions performed by school counselors and whether or not there isagreement between the principal and counselor. The study will also investigate if the
functions are in line with national standards or not.
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 117/120
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 118/120
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this study and would like to talk to
someone other than the researcher(s), you are encouraged to contact Marcia Shelton([email protected]) in the Compliance Office, Off ice for Research and
Development P.O. Box 519; MS 1200 Prairie View, Texas 77446 Phone936.261.1588 Fax 936.261.1550.
You will be given a copy of this information to keep for your records.
Statement of Consent:
I have read the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. Iconsent to participate in the study.
Signature:_____________________________________________ Date: __________________
Principal/Lead Counselor Name:__________________________________________________
Principal/Lead Counselor Email:- _______________________________________________________
Signature of Investigator:___________________________________
Date: __________________
Please fax to 979-209-2572 or mail to:
Desiree Skinner
1801 Freestone Drive
College Station, TX 77845
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 119/120
APPENDIX E – IRB APPROVAL
Office of Research and Development Voice.936.261.1588Prairie View, Texas 77446-4149 FAX 936.261.1599Anderson Hall, Room 104 [email protected]
Institutional Biosafety Committee Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Institutional Review
Board
DATE: July 21, 2008MEMORANDUMTO: Desiree Skinner, principal investigator – doctoral candidate, dissertation
William A. Kritsonis, advisor/chairFROM: Marcia C. Shelton, director, research complianceSUBJECT: Initial Review and Determination
PROTOCOL NUMBER: 2008-0701-105
TITLE: High School Counselors” Role as Perceived by High School Principals and
Counselors in TexasREVIEW CATEGORY: Exempt – Reviewer M. C. Shelton – signature on originalAPPROVAL PERIOD: July 14, 2008 through July 13, 2009
Approval determination was based on the following Code of Federal Regulations:
45 CFR 46.110 (b) (1) – Some or all of the research appearing on the list and found by the
reviewer(s) involve no more than minimal risk.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ __
8/8/2019 Dr. Desiree Skinner, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-desiree-skinner-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 120/120
(7) Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and
social behavior) or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation,
human factors evaluation or quality assurance methodologies.
(Note: Some research in this category may be exempt from the HHS regulations for the protection of
human subjects. 45 CFR 46.101 (b) (2) and (b) (3). This listing refers only to research that is not exempt.)
Provisions: Funding Source: none
This research project has been approved for one (1) year. As principal investigator, you assume the
following responsibilities:
1. Continuing Review: The protocol must be renewed each year in order to continue with the
research project. A Continuing Review along with required documents must be submitted 30 days
before the end of the approval period. Failure to do so may result in processing delays and/or non-renewal.
2. Completion Report: Upon completion of the research project (including data analysis and final
written papers), a Completion Report must be submitted to the IRB Office.
3. Adverse Events: Adverse events must be reported to the IRB Office immediately.
4. Amendments: Changes to the protocol must be requested by submitting an Amendment to the
IRB Office for review. The Amendment must be approved by the IRB before being implemented.
5. Informed Consent: Information must be presented to enable persons to
voluntarily decide whether or not to participate in the research project.