DPR Bridges
-
Upload
bilal-ahmed-barbhuiya -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of DPR Bridges
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
1/65
FEASIBILITY STUDY ANDPREPARATION OF DPR
FOR BRIDGE PROJECTS
FEASIBILITY STUDY ANDPREPARATION OF DPR
FOR BRIDGE PROJECTS
1
Ashok Kumar
Chief EngineerMinistry of Road Transport & HighwaysGovt. of India
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
2/65
2. STAGES IN PROJECT PREPARATION
• Pre-feasibility report – Possible locations
– Nature of crossing
– Traffic scenario
• Feasibility report (FR)
– Preliminar surve and data collection
2
– Preliminary investigations of alternative sites
– Rough cost assessment for various alternatives
– Economic viability (IRR)
– Special design requirements, if any
– Model study, if required
– Schedule of pre-construction activities
– Recommendations
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
3/65
• Detailed project report (DPR) – Detailed surveys and investigations on the approved
site and alignment
– Detailed design and drawings
– Realistic cost estimate
3
– en er ocumen s nc u ng o uan es anspecifications
– Work programme
– Quality assurance system
– Maintenance Manual
– Any other special requirements
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
4/65
3. DATA COLLECTION
• Index map, site plan and contour survey plan
• Topographical and catchment area map• Geological map
• Traffic data including pedestrian traffic likely to use the bridge•
4
– Longitudinal and cross-section of river – Catchment area characteristics - rainfall pattern and run-off
physical characteristics (slope, soil) – River/channel characteristics - river flow pattern i.e.
perennial/seasonal and river traffic, physical features – Flood data records and water levels i.e. HFL, OFL and LWL – High and low tide levels for tidal channels (HTL and LTL)
– Requirement of navigational clearance both horizontal andvertical
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
5/65
• Subsoil data (IRC:78)
Soil characteristics and erodibility of bed and bank
Foundation investigation by boring to ascertain data on S.B.C. and
settlement
Surface and sub-surface soil investigation for immediate approaches
Construction materials
Sources and quality
• Environmental data
5
Quality of air, water and ground soil Impact of bridge on marine life and other environmental conditions
Severity of environment w.r.t corrosion (severe/moderate)
Wind and seismic data
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
6/65
• Details of existing utility services and need for
relocation, if any
• Data on the existing bridges upstream and downstream
– Len th and s an arran ement
6
– Vertical clearance
– Substructure and superstructure
– Foundations and protection works – Special features, if any
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
7/65
4. CRITERIA FOR SITE SELECTION
• Generally dependent on road alignment up to say200m length. Beyond 200m length, bridge settingis to be decided first and road alignment will followthe same.
• S uare or skew crossin with an le of skew
7
• Defined banks and spread of water at HFL/HTL
• Proximity of existing bridge
• Requirement of bank protection
• Alignment and length of approaches
• Access to site
• Aesthetic consideration
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
8/65
5. ANALYSIS OF DATA AND
FIXING DESIGN PARAMETERS• Determination of HFL/LWL
• Design discharge and velocity of flow
• Linear waterway and span arrangement
8
• Horizontal and vertical clearances and freeboard inthe approaches
• Subsoil data in foundation• Floor protection works
• Flyovers & Interchanges – proper traffic circulation
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
9/65
6. CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPAN
ARRANGEMENT• Piers to be preferably in line with the existing bridge
piers in case of proximity to avoid concentration of flowand turbulence
• Span length depends on type of founding strata
• Cost of superstructure vis-a-vis foundation and
9
substructure• Time of construction
• Design efforts and time required
• Ease of construction
• Availability of suitable contractors
• Easy repairs and replaceability of superstructure
• Riding quality
• Aesthetics
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
10/65
7. TYPE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE• Simply supported, continuous or balanced cantilever for
conventional bridges
• Cable stayed and suspension bridges for long spans
• R.C.C. Solid slab for spans upto 10 metre• Voided R.C.C. slab for 10 to 20 metres span
• Simply supported R.C.C. T-beam and slab for 10 to 25 metre
10
• Simply supported precast/cast-in-situ P.S.C. girders and
R.C.C. deck slab for spans 25 to 40 metre
• Simply supported P.S.C. box girders upto about 60 metre
• Continuous P.S.C box girders or bow string girders upto 120to 150 metre span built with cantilever segmental construction
method.
• Continuous arch bridges in R.C.C./P.S.C.
• Steel girders with composite R.C.C. deck slab.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
11/65
8. TYPE OF SUBSTRUCTURE• Solid wall type pier
• Circular column type pier (specially
11
• Solid wall type abutment
• Spill through column type abutment
• Straight/splayed return walls
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
12/65
9. TYPE OF FOUNDATION
• Circular well• Dumbell/Double-D shape well
12
• Pile foundation - bored pilescommonly used
• Shallow isolated open foundation
• Raft foundation
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
13/65
10. DECK CONFIGURATION• Two lane bridges• Multi-lane bridge with median verge and divided
carriageway• Width between outer most faces of railing kerb to
be same as the formation width in the immediate
13
• Footpath width minimum 1.50 m
• Width of median verge should preferably be kept
same as in the immediate approach• Railing in combination with crash barrier for major
bridges, flyovers, R.O.Bs
• Cross slope in deck and footpath
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
14/65
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS• Wearing coat on bridge deck
– Concrete wearing coat not recommended due
to problem of cracking and replacement
14
– um nous concre e usua y mm cover 10 to 15 mm thick mastic asphalt water
proofing layer
– Mastic asphalt layer (25 mm thickness ormore) over 40 mm thick bituminous concrete
layer for heavy traffic condition.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
15/65
• Expansion Joints - MOST Interim
Specifications & IRC: SP: 69 – 2005Guidelines and Specifications – Copper strip with polysulphide filling for small
gaps – Slab seal joint
– Stri seal oint u to 70 to 80mm a
15
– Modular joint for larger gaps – Compression seal
– Asphaltic plug joint (suitable for rehabilitation
projects) – Finger type joints for large movement
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
16/65
• Bearings
– Sliding plate bearings for spans around 15 metre
– Metallic rocker and rocker-cum-roller bearings (IRC 83-
Part I)
16
– as omer c ear ngs - ar
– POT cum PTFE bearings suitable for larger spans and
multi-directional rotation (IRC 83 – Part 3)
– Knuckle and pin bearings
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
17/65
• Utilities & Access for Inspection
– No water pipe line should be in contact with the bridge
components
– P&T and electric cables to be taken in duct supported by
17
– Maintenance platform around pier
– Continuous cantilever walkway at soffit level on either
side of box girder
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
18/65
12. DETAILED DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
• General arrangement drawing (GAD)
• Detailed design and drawings to be based on
18
relevant I.R.C./I.S. Codes
• Review of design based on site conditions
during execution particularly for foundations
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
19/65
13. TENDER DOCUMENTS
• General and special conditions of contract
• Technical specifications for various itemsbased on M.O.S.T. S ecifications
19
• Bill of Quantities (BOQ)
• Final drawings
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
20/65
14. SOME IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF
PROJECT PREPARATION FOR BRIDGES
• Subsoil investigation - Importance of different soilparameters in each location of bore holes for designand construction of well & pile foundation - At leastone bore hole in each foundation location for major
20
• Design of well foundation & pile foundation - loadtests
• Conceptualization to implementation - Step by step
approach
• Availability of land for storage of materials, labouraccommodation etc. for major projects
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
21/65
• Drainage, ventilation and lighting for sub-ways andunderpasses
• Safety of adjoining structures and pedestrainmovement during construction of urban flyoversetc.
• Design life of bridges 50-100 years depending
21
• Dynamic analysis and wind tunnel testing for cablestayed or suspension bridges
• Computer aided designs for speedy and accurateanalysis
• Realistic construction programme
• Special consideration for bridges in hilly areas
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
22/65
15. DURABILITY MEASURES IN
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION• Use of not too slender sections
• Increased cover to steel/cables• Control of cracking and crack width by good detailing
• Reduction in number of expansion joints and use of leak
22
proo o n s
• Water proofing of deck
• Anti-corrosive treatment to all steel reinforcement
• Good dense concrete
• Provision for future prestressing
• Fatigue testing of anchorages
• Fenders against barge impact on substructure
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
23/65
16. NEW MATERIALS &
CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUESHigh performance concrete (HPC)
• Super-politicizes and retardars
• Corrosion resistant steel
• Low relaxation prestressing strands
• High capacity strands and multi-strand pulling jack and
23
anc orages
• HDPE sheathing and synthetic grout for cables
• Precast pretensioned girders suitable for urban flyovers
• Unbonded prestressing cables for girders
• Large diameter (upto 2.5 m) bored cast-in-situ piles infoundation
• Incremental launching
• Slip form shuttering
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
24/65
17. CONCLUSIONA. FEASIBILITY REPORT
• Preliminary survey and data collection
• Selection of bridge site• Detailed survey and investigation and analysis of data and test results
• Proposal of span arrangements
•
24
,
• Select appropriate types of appurtenances
• Finalise GAD
B. DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
• Prepare detailed design and drawings incorporating durability measures
and review of design
• Prepare tender documents including BOQ and technical specifications
• Prepare quality assurance plan and maintenance manual
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
25/65
DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE &
25
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
26/65
Bridge Components1) Superstructure
2) Substructure
3) Foundations
4) Appurtances
26
Superstructure and Substructure, No uncertainties
Foundation: Full of uncertainties: Variation to the
contract
Hence Planning, Investigation Analysis and Design
plays a major role in deciding type of foundation
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
27/65
Study required for design of a Bridge• Hydraulic Analysis• Subsoil Investigation• Structural Analysis
Hydraulic Analysis:-• Sitting of Bridge• Fixing of Design discharge
27
• Scour Depth• Depth of Foundation
Subsoil Investigation:-• Bearing capacities of founding level• Soil properties of embankment material
• Soil properties of bed material
Structural Analysis:-• Stress in each component should be less than the permisseb value
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
28/65
HYDRAULIC PARAMETRE• DESIGN DISCHARGE
BY EMPERICAL FORMULAE
By Area Velocity MethodBy Unit Hydrograph Method
Emperical Formulae
28
• DICKENS’S FORMULAQ=CM3/4Where Q = the peak run-off in cu.m/sec. And M is the catchment area in
sq.km.
C = 11-14 where the annual rainfall is 60-120 cm;= 14-19 in Madhya Pradesh32 in Western Ghats.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
29/65
• Ryve’s Formula
Q = CM2/3 The formula was devised forchennai.
Where Q is run-off in cu.m./sec., andM is the catchment area in sq. km.
29
= . or areas w n m o e coas8.5 for areas between 25 and 160 km of
the coast and10.0 for limited areas near
hills.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
30/65
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
31/65
By Area Velocity Method• V=1/nR2/3 S1/2
Where V= the velocity in m per sec.,
R = Hydraulic mean depth= A/P
31
S = slope of the bedn = the regosity coefficient
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
32/65
Effective Linear Waterway• W = C√Q
Where
W = Linear Waterway
32
Q = Design maximum dischargeC = 4.8
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
33/65
Afflux• Afflux is the height by which the natural flood level of the
river rises at any point due to constriction and/or
obstruction which may be calculated as belowh = (V2 /17.88 + 0.015) {(A/a)2 – 1}
Where
33
h = Afflux in meteresV = average velocity of the water in the river prior toconstriction in m/sec.
A = Unobstructed sectional area of the river at proposed
site in sq.m.a = Constricted area of the river at the bridge in sq.m.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
34/65
Vertical Clearance above HFLDischarge in cumecs
Upto 0.3
Minimum verticalClearances in mm
150
34
Above 0.3 and upto 3Above 3 and upto 30
Above 30 and upto
300Above 300 and upto3000
Above 3000
450600
900
1200
1500
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
35/65
Fixing of Deck Level1) HFL + Afflux + clearance above HFL
+Depth of Super structure
35
x ng o oun at on eve• From Hydraulic consideration – Minimum
grip below Scour level = 1/3rd Maximum
Scour depth• From Bearing Capacity Point of view
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
36/65
Mean Depth of Scourdsm = 1.34{Db
2 /Ksf}1/3
Where
Db = The design discharge forfoundation per metre with at
effective linear waterway.K = Silt factor for a re resentative
36
sample of bed material obtainedupto the level of anticipated deepest
scour.Ksf = 1.76(dm)
1/2
Where dm is the mean diameter of bed materialMaximum Scour for pier = 2 dsmMaximum Scour for abutment = 1.27 dsm
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
37/65
Type of Foundations
• Shallow Foundation(open foundation)
37
,
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
38/65
Type of Foundation• Shallow Foundation transfers the loads
and moments from Superstructure directlyto the foundation base, without any
38
.
• Deep Foundation, the passive relief isprovided by the soil grip below the scour
level.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
39/65
Open Foundation• Suited where hard / rock strata is available
at shallow depth
39
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
40/65
Open foundations can be adopted:
1) Best suited where rock is available closer to the bed level
span range 20m. Made continuous by deck continuity is
economical
2) Where scour is not appreciable. Good founding dataavailable is at 3m to 4m below ground level.
40
scour level means scour shall not be more than 2m.
4) Alternatively bed can be protected.
5) Cellular open foundation suitable for rocky strata.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
41/65
Pile Foundations:
Traditionally adopted for flyover and creek bridges where no
scour was expected.
Why pile foundations were not adopted for river bridgesbecause:
1 ulnerable a ainst concentration of flow
41
2) At deep scour locations unsupported length turns out to be
high
3) Can be damaged by floating debris and rolling boulders
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
42/65
1) Precast driven piles
2) Precast bored piles
3 Cast in-situ driven iles
TYPE OF PILE FOUNDATION
42
4) Cast in-situ bored piles
5) Steel Piles
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
43/65
Classification of Piles:
1) Friction Piles
43
3) Friction and End Bearing Piles
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
44/65
Suitable Locations:1) Span range not more than 50m
2) Scour between 10m and 15m
3) Discharge per m length low – For river
bridges
44
4) For flyovers and creeks
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
45/65
Well Foundations
1) Suitable for location where heavy scour occurs
2) Discharge per meter length is high
3) Velocity flow is high
45
,
5) If well foundations are adopted go for larger spans
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
46/65
Sinking of Well Foundation
1) Sinking by grabbing
2) Using grabbing and Kent ledge
3) Blasting
46
5) Jackdown Method
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
47/65
Analysis of Open Foundation
1) Design combination of actions has to be chosen
2) Load to be considerer for Design• Dead load
• Live load• Snow load• Wind load
• Water current
47
• ong tu na orces cause y tract ve e ort o ve c es or y ra ng
ofvehicles and/or those caused by restraint of movement of free bearings byfriction or deformation• Buoyancy
• Earth Pressure including live load surcharge, if any
3) Live load for two lane bridge• Class A – Double lane• 70R - Wheel
• 70R – Track• Footpath live load
4) Earth Pressure
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
48/65
4) Earth Pressure• Active Earth Pressure• Passive Earth Pressure
- Rankine’s TheoryKa= 1-sinφ /1-sinφKp = 1/ka
- Coulomb’s TheroyKa = cos2φ /[1+√sin(φ+α )sinφ /cosφ]2
Kp = cos2φ /[1-√sin(φ+ α)sinφ /cos?]2
5) Water Current Force
48
settlements shall be within allowable limits.
80% of contact area to be ensured in case of rock under normal condition
67% of contact area to be ensured under seismic condition.
The bearing pressure on rock shall be within allowable limits.
7) Foundation has to be socketed in case of foundation resting on rock.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
49/65
Analysis of Well Foundation
1) The scour level and founding level shall be fixed,based on, waterway discharge and soilcharacteristics.
2) Sizing of well shall be carried. The wells can beanalysed either following IRC 45 in case of sandy
49
.
3) The forces and moments and foundation levelincluding the side resistance to be calculated afteraccounting for Buoyancy, Tilt and Shift.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
50/65
4) a) The stability of the foundation againstoverturning and sliding shall be ensured.
b) The contact area condition remains same as that ofopen foundation
c) The base pressure and the settlement should bewithin allowable limits
50
5) Passive resistance shall be ignored where the wellsare seated on rock. Hence, the well becomesgravity well.
D i f F d i
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
51/65
Design of Foundation
A) Open Foundation
1) Depth of Open Foundationa – In Soil - the minimum depth of open foundation shall be upto stratum
Having safe bearing capacity but not less than 2.0m below the Scour levelor the protected bed level.
b – In Rock – In hard rock, with an ultimate crushing strength of 10 MPQ – - –
51
. .
2) Thickness of footing – Thickness of footing shallnot be less than 300mm
3) Shall be designed for the moment at the face of
pier/abutment.
4) Permissible stress
–Increased by 33% for case when wind force is considered
- Increased by 50% when seismic force is considered
5) Area of tension Reinforcement should not be less than 0.15% of theX ti
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
52/65
X=section area.6) All faces of the footing shall be provided with a minimum steel Of 250
mm2/m in each direction.7) Spacing of bars shall not be more than 300mm.8) Base pressure – should be less than allowable bearing capacities9) Permissible
tension at base – No tension is permitted under
any combinations of roads onsoil.
- In case of rock if tension isfound at base, the base area
52
should be reduced to a size where no
tension will occur and basepressure is recalculated.
11) The shear shall be checked at effective distance away form to face ofpier.
12) The punching shear shall be checked around pier and pile at adistance of d/2.13) The crack width if required shall be checked.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
53/65
B) Pile Foundation
1) Shall be designed for minimum vertical load andmaximum moment which will decide thereinforcement.
2) The maximum loaded pile with associatedmoment shall also be checked for compressivestress in concrete.
53
3) Minimum reinforcement shall be ensured.
C) Well Foundation
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
54/65
1) Component of well foundation
a) Cutting Edge – Steel cutting edge shall be strong40 kg/m – to facilitate Sinking of Well
b) Well Curb – Should offer the minimum resistancewhile sinking
C) Well Foundation
54
- RCC – Minimum M25 concret- Minimum reinforcement – 72 kg/cu-m.
- In case of blasting inner faces shall be protected
with steel plates with minimum thickness not lessthan 10mm.
c) Bottom Plug – Concrete shall have minimum
cement content of 330 kg/m3
& slump – 150mm
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
55/65
• d Well SteiningThickness h= Kd*l^1/2
h - Minimum thicknessd - External Diameter of circular well
55
l- Depth of well in m below top of wellcap
k- a constant = 0.3
4)Shift – 150mm.
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
56/65
4)Shift 150mm.
5)The zero shear section shall be arrived.6)The bending moment at vertical load shall
be worked out.
7)Steining of the well foundation shall bechecked for combined axial load & Bending
56
.
8)Reinforcement may be provided accordingly.
9)For rock wells, the well steining section shallbe examined at top of the kerb.
Failure of Bridges
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
57/65
g
Inadequate slope protection
57
Inadequate bed protection
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
58/65
Inadequate bed protection
58
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
59/65
59Inadequate bed protectionInadequate bed protection
Inadequate opening size
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
60/65
Inadequate opening size
60
Inadequate opening size
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
61/65
Inadequate opening size
61
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
62/65
Inadequate
study
62
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
63/65
Sliding of
bearing
63
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
64/65
Sliding of
64
bearing
-
8/17/2019 DPR Bridges
65/65
65