Download the Annual CIP Report for FY2017 (June 2016)

June 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Review

Harris County Commissioners CourtCounty Judge Ed EmmettCommissioner, Precinct 1 Gene L. LockeCommissioner, Precinct 2 Jack MormanCommissioner, Precinct 3 Steve RadackCommissioner, Precinct 4 R. Jack Cagle

Harris County Flood Control DistrictExecutive Director Mike TalbottAssistant Director, Director of Operations Russ PoppeChief Engineer Steve FitzgeraldDirector of Construction Division Liz BondDirector of Engineering Division Alan BlackDirector of Human Resources Kathy RoachDirector of Infrastructure Division Sandra MusgroveDirector of Planning Division Ataul HannanDirector of Support Services Anthony BacarisseChief Operations Officer Matt Zeve


The District accomplishes its mission by:

The mission of the Harris County Flood Control District is to:

OUR MISSIONSince its creation, the Harris County Flood Control District’s role has become increasingly complex. Whereas, its original role was to serve as the local partner for major projects with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, many other facets of reducing flood risks in Harris County have come into play.

Provide flood damage reduction projects that work, with appropriate regard for community and natural values.

Devising the flood damage reduction plans

Implementingthe plans

Maintaining the infrastructure


1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 6

1.2 Highlights of 2016 ............................................................................................................ 7

2.0 PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 9

2.1 Need for Investment in a Capital Improvement Program for Flood Control ................... 10

2.2 Benefits of Capital Investment ........................................................................................ 14

2.3 Partnerships ..................................................................................................................... 18

2.4 Capital Program Strategy................................................................................................. 24

3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ....................................................................................... 29

3.1 Historical Summary of CIP Activity .................................................................................. 30

3.2 Summary of CIP Activity in Previous Fiscal Year ............................................................ 31

3.3 Drawdown of Funding ...................................................................................................... 32

3.4 Project Brays ................................................................................................................... 34

3.5 Recommended Projects For FY 2017 Funding ............................................................... 35

3.6 “Basis of Planning” Assumption for Five-Year CIP Funding .......................................... 37

3.7 Proposed Projects for FY 2018-FY 2021 ......................................................................... 38

3.8 Proposed Projects for a Fully Funded Five-Year CIP....................................................... 39

APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 41

Appendix A – Currently Funded Projects

Appendix B – Proposed Projects for Funding in FY 17

Appendix C – Proposed Projects for Funding FY 18-21

Appendix D – Future Projects

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTIONJune 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Annual Review

June 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Annual Review | 6

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background While the residents of Harris County understand they live with the risk of flooding – our region’s No. 1

natural threat – they also believe that steps can and should be taken to reduce that threat. The Harris County Flood Control District’s mission is to reduce risks to homes and businesses by providing “flood damage reduction projects that work, with appropriate regard for community and natural values.”

Although the Flood Control District is largely recognized as the agency responsible for implementing flood-risk reduction projects in Harris County, it does not have sole jurisdiction over all drainage and flood-related issues in the county. As the county becomes more urbanized, many municipalities and special districts have been created, each managing drainage within its respective jurisdiction. The Flood Control District is different from these other entities in the scale of its mission, which can be quantitatively described as:

• 22 primary watersheds • Approximately 1,500 channels• More than 2,500 miles of channel • 6 8 regional stormwater detention basins

covering approximately 8,800 acres• 34 incorporated cities

• More than 4.4 million people in the nation’s third most populous county, with growth projected to pass the 5 million mark in 2025

• 1,777 square miles of territory• More than 443 square miles of defined 1%

(100-year) floodplains (25% of Harris County)


The Flood Control District works to meet its mission, rain or shine. While it is easy to take flood damage reduction for granted when skies are clear, a major storm quickly reminds us all that flooding can cause significant economic damages and personal trauma. In recognition of this ongoing need for flood damage reduction projects, the Flood Control District prepares an annual $60 million Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that is submitted to its governing body, Harris County Commissioners Court; and a five-year CIP that is published annually. The Flood Control District’s goal in publishing an annual review of the CIP is to provide transparency, communicate the ongoing need for flood damage reduction capital projects in Harris County, and identify projects that have been recommended for implementation based on anticipated funding.

The five-year CIP conveys where and when the Flood Control District plans to make the strategic infrastructure investments necessary to reduce flooding risks, predominately from overflowing bayous, streams and tributaries which are our main responsibility within Harris County. The “five-year” term refers to a time window that is updated at the start of each fiscal year and extends five years into the future. The Flood Control District’s fiscal year (FY) is from the first day in March to the last day in February of the following year and is identified by the year of the last day, i.e. FY 2016 was from March 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016. This annual report about the Flood Control District’s CIP describes how the capital project program is managed, summarizes recent investment in capital projects, and includes forecasts of both existing and future spending, based on current and anticipated project funding over the next five years.

1.2 Highlights of 2016

• Since 1989, successful partnerships with the federal government have resulted in federal investments of about $674 million in construction and buyout projects in Harris County. This federal investment includes $160 million in reimbursements to the Flood Control District. The Flood Control District investment for these projects was about $374 million.

• In September 2015, construction began on two regional stormwater detention basins in the Greens Bayou watershed that together represent the largest single construction contract ever managed by the Flood Control District. The $63.7 million contract for the Kuykendahl and Glen Forest basins is partially funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. When complete, the two basins will reduce flooding risks for more than 1,100 structures along Greens Bayou.

• Since the Flood Control District’s voluntary buyout program began in 1985, more than 2,900 flood-prone properties have been purchased with Flood Control District funds, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers funds and FEMA grant funds.

• After the Tax Day Flood of April 2016, the Flood Control District adjusted funding priorities and allocated more than $5 million dollars for buyouts of certain flooded structures.

• While significant structural flooding did occur last year, it is estimated that more than 10,000 homes and businesses avoided flooding in 2015 due to construction projects completed in the past 20 years and buyouts managed by the Flood Control District.


• In the past fiscal year, the Flood Control District executed: - 30 CIP construction contracts worth more than $85.4 million - 7 CIP right-of-way acquisitions for $13.7 million - 19 CIP design contracts for $6.5 million

• Last fiscal year, the Flood Control District excavated more than 2.6 million cubic yards of soil to create detention basins or increase the capacity of channels to move stormwater more effectively.

• As of February 29, 2016, the Flood Control District had more than $268 million programmed toward flood damage reduction measures. This includes both structural (construction) and non-structural (right-of-way acquisition) flood damage reduction projects.

• The value of construction projects scheduled to advertise for bids in FY 2017 is approximately $106 million.

PROGRAM OVERVIEWJune 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Annual Review


The table on the next page lists the top 10 years of national flood insurance claims in Harris County.

2.0 PROGRAM OVERVIEW 2.1 Need for Investment in a Capital Improvement Program for Flood Control

Most communities experience rain events, and most have similar options for dealing with floodwaters: They can move or store floodwater; move people to higher ground; and/or promote the purchase of flood insurance. What sets Harris County apart is the scale of its flooding problem.

Flooding is often called Harris County’s No. 1 natural hazard. Nature challenges us with flat terrain, clay soils that don’t readily absorb water, and a 30-year average annual rainfall of 49.8 inches. Tens of thousands of homes and businesses are in FEMA-identified floodplains. Each watershed in Harris County has its own independent flooding problems that present unique challenges. Severe flooding doesn’t happen every day, but when it does, the resulting damage can be sudden and costly.

Because anywhere in Harris County can flood – not just the shaded areas of FEMA’s regulated floodplains – the Flood Control District encourages all residents to have flood insurance to financially protect themselves from flood losses.

• Forty-one percent of all flood insurance policies in Texas are in Harris County.

• Residents of Harris County paid more than $355 million in flood insurance premiums in 2015. This is about 38% of all premiums paid in Texas.

• In 2015, more than 6,300 flood insurance claims were filed in Harris County for more than $333 million. This is about 52% of all claims in Texas.

Since April 1976:

• More than 109,000 flood insurance claims have come from Harris County. This is about 43% of claims in Texas.

• More than $2.7 billion in losses have been paid for with flood insurance payments within Harris County. This is about 44% of losses paid in Texas.


NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP)Top 10 Years for Number of ClaimsHarris County, Texas, 1978 – 2015

(as of February 2016)

** Information on the floods of 2015 and 2016 is still being gathered

Exhibit 1 shows where house flooding has occurred in Harris County since 1989, not including Tropical Storm Allison (June 2001) or Hurricane Ike storm surge flooding (Sept 2008). Exhibit 2, which is based on information from NFIP claims, shows the location and density of flooding associated with Tropical Storm Allison in June of 2001.

EXH

IBIT

1 -

Loca

tions

of H

ouse

Flo

odin

g Si

nce

1979

(N

ot in

clud

ing

TS A

lliso

n or

Hur

rican

e Ik

e co

asta

l sto

rm s

urge

)

EXH

IBIT

2 –

Tro

pica

l Sto

rm A

lliso

n


2.2.1 Flood Damage Reduction The Flood Control District’s capital projects fall under two basic categories – structural and

non-structural – that both work to provide flood damage reduction and other community benefits.

Construction Projects Projects to widen and deepen bayous and major drainage channels keep stormwater moving out

of neighborhoods and downstream to Galveston Bay. Stormwater detention basins safely store excess floodwater and slowly release it back to the bayou when the threat of flooding has passed. These structural projects help keep stormwater where it belongs, and out of peoples’ homes and businesses.

Buyouts and Floodplain Preservation One of the Flood Control District’s most effective flood damage reduction tools is its Voluntary

Home Buyout Program, sponsored in part by FEMA. This non-structural program involves buying and demolishing structures that are located deep in flood-prone areas, and where construction projects to reduce flood levels are impractical. Homes and businesses in these buyout programs were typically built years before modern floodplain management regulations and before our current understanding of flood risk. The impact of buyouts is immediate and the benefits are permanent: Once a flood-prone home or business is bought and demolished, it will never flood again. The land remains open space forever – as part of the floodplain, as a park, and/or as part of another Flood Control District structural project like a stormwater detention basin.

2.2.2 Financial Benefits Lost work days, water-damaged vehicles, personal property losses, damage to infrastructure,

declining property values, public safety costs – the potential financial consequences of flooding come in many unpleasant forms. A review of major projects by the Flood Control District over the past 20 years shows that every $1 invested toward flood risk reduction results in at least $3 in direct avoided damages from property flooding, content damage, flooded vehicles and damages to public infrastructure.

2.2.3 Damages Avoided in the Floods of 2015 After the wettest spring period ever on record for the City of Houston, Harris County experienced

several major rain events in 2015 that illustrate both the benefits of past flood damage reduction projects and also how much work remains to be done.

2.2 Benefits of Capital Investment


Memorial Day Storm of 2015During a three-hour period on the evening of Memorial Day, portions of southwest Harris County experienced one of the most significant urban flash flood events since Tropical Storm Allison. Some locations reported receiving 10 or more inches of rainfall in six hours, greatly exceeding the statistical 100-year (1% annual exceedance probability) rainfall amount for the same time period. There were seven fatalities in Harris County as a result of this event. Based on house count estimates, between 3,000 and 6,000 structures were flooded, while 7,000-plus motorists were stranded.

However, because of structural flood damage reduction projects completed in the past 20 years – including stormwater detention basins and channel improvements – about 8,000 homes in rain-soaked areas along Brays Bayou suffered no structural flooding on Memorial Day. An additional 500 flood-prone homes previously removed in voluntary buyouts countywide also avoided damages that otherwise would have occurred during the Memorial Day Flood.

May 26, 2015, Brays Bayou near S Rice looking east

In addition, projects completed as part of the Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project prevented damages to several hundred homes and businesses that otherwise would have flooded.


Halloween Storm of 2015 On October 30 and 31, severe flash flooding with multiple tornados resulted in one flood-related

fatality and the inundation of 400 structures and several roadways in Harris County.

However, previously completed work on the Sims Bayou and Brays Bayou federal projects prevented damages to more than a thousand homes that otherwise would have flooded during the Halloween Storm. Flood damage reduction work on White Oak Bayou also prevented flooding in as many as 300 homes. And an estimated 150 flood-prone homes previously removed in voluntary buyouts in the Halls, Greens, Hunting and other watersheds avoided damages that otherwise would have occurred during the Halloween Storm.

2.2.4 Damages Avoided in the Floods of 2016 While data from is still being analyzed, it is clear that past flood damage reduction projects also

provided significant benefits during major rain events in the first half of calendar year 2016.

During the devastating Tax Day Flood of April 17-18, 2016, which struck northern and western Harris County and resulted in seven fatalities, it is estimated that:

• Previously completed components of Project Brays prevented damages to about 1,500 homes and businesses that otherwise would have flooded. Channel conveyance improvements and 10 bridge replacements or modifications downstream of Fannin Street lowered flood levels, while the Archbishop Joseph A. Fiorenza Park (Eldridge), Mike Driscoll Park (Old Westheimer), Arthur Storey Park and Willow Waterhole stormwater detention basins temporarily held 2.1 billion gallons of stormwater.

• Previously completed components of regional and federal projects on White Oak Bayou (in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) prevented damages to about 1,800 homes and businesses that otherwise would have flooded. Channel conveyance improvements and multiple bridge replacements or modifications lowered flood levels, while the excavation of ten regional and federal detention basins temporarily held 1.3 billion gallons of stormwater

• Other previously completed Flood Control District channel conveyance projects – either in partnership with the Corps or independently – on Vogel Creek, Willow Creek, Greens Bayou and others, and stormwater detention basins on Mason Creek, Langham Creek, Horsepen Creek, Cypress Creek and Greens Bayou, also helped keep stormwater out of homes and businesses on Tax Day 2016.

• In addition, thanks to past voluntary home buyouts in the Greens Bayou, White Oak Bayou, Cypress Creek, San Jacinto River, Halls Bayou, Brays Bayou and other watersheds, 1,500 homes did not flood during the Tax Day storm because they had previously been removed from the floodplain. In partnership with FEMA and also acting independently, the Flood Control District acquires flood-prone homes, moves the residents to higher ground, and demolishes the structures. The land is then left undeveloped for open space and natural floodplain functions.


During the Memorial Day Flood of May 26-27, 2016, which hit north and northwest Harris County, it is estimated that:

• Regional detention basins in Cypress Creek, Little Cypress Creek and Willow Creek watersheds stored a significant amount of stormwater that otherwise could have flooded homes and businesses.

• In addition, thanks to past voluntary home buyouts in the Cypress Creek, San Jacinto River, Willow Creek, Little Cypress Creek and Spring Creek watersheds, 390 homes did not flood during the Memorial Day storm because they previously had been removed from the floodplain (either in partnership with FEMA or directly by the Flood Control District).

2.2.5 Other Benefits Reduction in the Cost of Flood Insurance Another benefit of the Flood Control District’s capital investments is lower flood insurance

premiums for many policyholders. Over the past decade – through planning, design and construction efforts, as well as productive cooperation with partner agencies – the Flood Control District removed the regulated floodplain from more than 60,000 residences and businesses in Harris County, thus reducing flood insurance premiums for those properties. Unfortunately, more than 100,000 homes still remain within the regulated floodplains.

Improved Quality of Life Beyond the obvious financial and safety benefits, flood damage reduction investments can have

other profound impacts on a well-planned community. When flood control facilities are not being fully utilized to either convey or store stormwater, bayou banks and stormwater detention basin properties are available for other community uses such as parks, trails, sports fields, recreational ponds, and environmental restoration and enhancement.

Rendering of trail and park features along Brays Bayou near Mason Park


Reducing potential flood damages is a big job requiring dedicated public funding. The Flood Control District’s ability to maintain productive relationships with federal, state and local government partners, as well as with private and non-profit interests, helps maximize the impact of Harris County tax dollars and provide better flood control projects for the community. These partnerships also add value and improve the quality of life in Harris County through the multi-use of flood control properties for trails, parks and other public amenities.

Since its creation in 1937, the Flood Control District has served as local partner with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) on federally funded flood control projects. Over time, the Flood Control District’s role with the Corps and other federal agencies has grown significantly.

Federal projects typically involve long-term, integrated planning efforts along the main bayou systems that are most prone to flooding, or support the buyout of flood-prone properties. Federal participation in these programs typically ranges from 50 to as high as 100 percent. In the past 20 years, successful partnerships with the federal government have resulted in federal investments of about $674 million in construction and buyout projects in Harris County. This federal investment includes $160 million in reimbursements to the Flood Control District. The District has provided its share of these projects totaling about $374 million. This relationship would not have been possible without the level of trust that the Flood Control District has built with its federal partners, and its reputation as a local sponsor that “gets things done.”

The Flood Control District holds fee title or easements on more than 2,500 miles of channels and more than 8,800 acres of regional stormwater detention basins. As of February 2016 there are more than 200 miles of trails adjacent to channels in Harris County and the Flood Control District also has formal agreements for the recreational use and maintenance of 10 basins totaling 1,560 acres in Harris County.

City of Houston, Houston Parks Board, Bayou Preservation Association, Buffalo Bayou Partnership, Energy Corridor District, Greens Bayou Corridor Coalition and other municipalities also partner with the Flood Control District to make the most of Harris County’s bayous, drainage channels and basins. Across Harris County’s four precincts, these miles of trails, acres of parks, and partnerships to promote multi-use of Flood Control District right of way are contributing to Harris County having a countywide greenway and trails system that is the envy of many other communities.

2.3 Partnerships


Despite congressional project funding limitations and ongoing budget reform to reduce federal spending in recent years, the Flood Control District continues to pursue federal funding for Harris County. In 2016, reimbursements were received by the Flood Control District for the Brays Bayou Federal Flood Risk Reduction Project (Project Brays) totaling more than $8.1 million, a total of more than $167.5 million since the project began. In 2015, FEMA awarded $39.2 million to the Flood Control District, under the Hurricane Ike Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), for the construction of two stormwater detention basins in the Greens Bayou watershed.

2.3.1 Partnerships with the Corps of Engineers Currently, the Flood Control District and the Corps are cooperating on six projects along the

major bayous of Harris County, totaling nearly $1.4 billion:

Corps-Lead Projects These are projects for which the Corps is the lead agency responsible for project design and

construction, with support from the Flood Control District as local sponsor. As the local sponsor, the Flood Control District secures easements and rights of way; relocates utilities; adjusts bridges (except for railroad bridges); and operates and maintains the project after construction is complete.

Sims Bayou (construction completed in 2015) • $395 million total cost • HCFCD share $125 million (32%); Corps share $270 million (68%) • 4 percent (25-year) level of flood protection (under full development) • 1 percent (100-year) floodplain removed from approximately 35,000 homes and 2,000

commercial structures (according to original Corps estimates) • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 6.5

Clear Creek (General Reevaluation Report approved in 2013) • $193 million total estimated cost; expenditures to date total $55 million • HCFCD and two other Local Sponsors share $68 million (35%); Corps share $125 million (65%) • 1 percent (100-year) floodplain removed from approximately 2,100 structures • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 1.8

Greens Bayou (design and construction underway) • $58 million total estimated cost • HCFCD share $9 million (25%); Corps share $29 million (75%) • 10 percent (10-year) level of protection for partial development • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 4.9

HCFCD-Lead projects Three sponsor-lead projects in Harris County were authorized under Section 211(f) of the Water

Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996. This WRDA section allowed the local sponsor – instead of the Corps – to plan, design and construct the project, and to be reimbursed for the federal share provided certain conditions are satisfied. One key advantage of this arrangement is that the Flood Control District can initiate a project with local funding, and be reimbursed when federal appropriations become available.


Provisions of WRDA 1996 have since been repealed by the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014. However, the Flood Control District entered into agreements with the Corps on three projects before Section 211(f) of WRDA 1996 expired, preserving the Flood Control District’s ability to qualify for reimbursement for the following HCFCD-lead projects:

Brays Bayou (design and construction underway) • $480 million total estimated cost; expenditures to date total $308 million • HCFCD share $240 million (50%); Corps share $240 million (50%) • Number of structures subject to 4 percent (25-year) flood reduced from 3,520 to 50 • Number of structures subject to 1 percent (100-year) flood reduced from 16,800 to 1,800 • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 7.0

Hunting Bayou (design and construction underway) • $165 million total estimated cost; expenditures to date total $38.5 million • HCFCD share $98 million (59%); Corps share $67 million (41%) • Number of structures subject to 10 percent (10-year) flood reduced from 1,200 to 35 • Number of structures subject to 1 percent (100-year) flood reduced from 5,100 to 650 • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 2.0 White Oak Bayou (design and construction) • $124 million total estimated cost; expenditures to date total $85.2 million • HCFCD share $54 million (43%); Corps share $70 million (57%) • Number of structures subject to 10 percent (10-year) flood reduced from 1,300 to 50 • Number of structures subject to 1 percent (100-year) flood reduced from 6,100 to 4,600 • Benefit-to-Cost ratio = 7.2

The Flood Control District qualifies for reimbursement of the federal share of completed design and construction work. As they are received, reimbursements will be programmed toward the remaining elements that have yet to be constructed on each respective project. Federal appropriations for flood damage reduction are considered every year as part of the federal budget process.

More details of on-going projects made possible through this partnership with the Corps are in the Flood Control District’s yearly Federal Briefing publication available at www.hcfcd.org.

2.3.2 Partnerships with FEMA Another important federal partner is the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Flood

Control District’s partnership with FEMA includes implementation of both structural and non-structural projects to reduce the risk of flooding, as well as management of flood insurance rate maps within Harris County. The objective is to reduce flood insurance claims and federal disaster assistance.


Structural projects Currently the Flood Control District is working with the help of FEMA grants on two structural projects:

Homestead Stormwater Detention Basin, Phase 2 construction (Hunting Bayou) • $3.1 million total estimated cost • HCFCD share $0.8 million (26%); FEMA share $2.3 million (74%)

Kuykendahl and Glen Forest Stormwater Detention Basins construction (Greens Bayou) • $62.9 million total estimated cost • HCFCD share $22.0 million (35%); FEMA share $40.9 million (65%)

Non-structural projects Non-structural projects remove residents from the floodplain and make sure that no one else builds

a home in the same flood-prone location. These properties are located deep in the floodplain – often out of reach of structural flood damage reduction projects. Since the Flood Control District’s buyout program began in 1985, more than 2,000 structures have been purchased with FEMA grant funds (and Flood Control District matching funds).

• Residents were relocated away from the threat of an identified floodplain.

• Flood-prone structures were demolished and will never flood again.

• The land was restored as open space or repurposed for use as a community benefit.

In May of 2016, the Flood Control District submitted a Flood Mitigation Assistance grant application for $17.8 million, with a federal share of $15.7 million (88%), if approved. The Flood Control District also is preparing to submit information – under a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program grant application tied to the Tax Day Flood of April 2016 – identifying “areas of buyout interest” with structures that meet Flood Control District criteria and have an acceptable benefit-to-cost ratio.


Model and Map Management Program Model and map management is important to the CIP because it provides up-to-date computer

models and maps of floodplains that improve planning, design and construction of flood damage reduction projects by the Flood Control District. These models and maps also help existing residents understand flooding and prevent new construction from worsening or creating new flooding problems.

Since 2010, the Flood Control District has coordinated with FEMA on technical review of Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and Conditional Letters of Map Revision (CLOMRS). As a Cooperating Technical Partner with FEMA, the Flood Control District maintains the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) models, which are updated as watershed and channel conditions change within Harris County. Costs of the program are covered 100 percent by FEMA grants. The Flood Control District applied for a FEMA grant in mid-2016 to continue this program for a seventh year. Benefits of this program to the residents of Harris County include:

• Access to current data and models to plan future flood damage reduction and land development projects

• Improved review and approval time

• Documentation of local issues and projects

• Coordination of adjacent active LOMRs/CLOMRs

• Availability to discuss submittals with Flood Control District staff.

Since beginning the LOMR Delegation program in September 2010 through June 2016, the Flood Control District has received 110 cases and completed 100 of them.

The Flood Control District also participates in the Risk MAP (Mapping, Assessment and Planning) program. The objective of the Risk MAP program is to improve the National Flood Insurance Program by identifying and reducing the financial impacts of risks and uncertainty. Risk MAP provides communities with more precise flood mapping products and risk assessment tools, which strengthen their ability to make informed decisions. In FY 2017, the Flood Control District is working on the following Risk MAP study efforts:

Addicks Watershed Restudy • Deliverables accepted by FEMA early 2016 • Notice published in Federal Register February 12, 2016 • 90-day appeal and comment period began March 24, 2016 • Total cost = $1,142,910 (66% FEMA share, 34% HCFCD share)

White Oak Bayou • Grant period of performance began October 1, 2015 • Deliverables to be submitted to FEMA by September 30, 2016 • New effective maps expected by September 30, 2018 • Total cost = $270,671 (74% FEMA share, 26% HCFCD share)


Brays Bayou • Intend to apply for FEMA grant for $400,000 to do Risk MAP study on Brays Bayou (75%

FEMA share, 25% HCFCD share) • Study would begin in October 2016.

2.3.3 Non-Federal Partnerships Cost-sharing and multi-use agreements with state, county and local partners help the Flood

Control District extend available capital funding, expedite implementation of worthwhile projects and add quality-of-life value to the community.

These local partnerships take a variety of forms, which may include jointly acquiring property, building and maintaining a flood storage or conveyance facility, and providing financial support for projects that meet a Flood Control District purpose. Examples of these local partnerships include:

Texas Water Development Board • In 2015 the Flood Control District completed a study for upper Cypress Creek and the

Addicks and Barker Reservoir watersheds. A steering committee with representatives from both the public and private sectors assisted in developing the Cypress Creek Overflow Management Study. This study was funded with a Flood Protection Planning Grant of $750,000 from the TWDB.

• The Flood Control District applied for a $500,000 grant from TWDB to do a flood risk reduction study on the Cedar Bayou watershed (50% TWDB share, 50% HCFCD share). The study would begin in late 2016.

Harris County In addition to contributing capital funding, the Flood Control District routinely partners with

and provides technical support to Harris County. One example is John Paul’s Landing in western Harris County, where a stormwater detention basin on a site excavated by the Flood Control District will become the centerpiece of a Harris County park.

Galveston County The Flood Control District entered into an Interlocal Agreement with Galveston County in

January 2012 to acquire a 134-acre site and construct the South Belt Stormwater Detention Basin. This basin provides additional upstream stormwater storage capacity for Mud Gully, and will allow for future channel widening on Clear Creek and an adjacent tributary. Galveston County is sharing the $20 million project cost equally with the Flood Control District.


City of Houston The Flood Control District has a history of coordinating on projects with the City of Houston

(COH). Currently the Flood Control District is coordinating with COH on the development of 244 acres of land that was previously the Inwood Forest golf course along the banks of White Oak Bayou and Vogel Creek. The COH acquired the property for various stormwater management functions, and will allow the Flood Control District to use a portion of the detention capacity to assist in reducing existing flood risks along White Oak Bayou and Vogel Creek.

The project has an estimated cost of $20 million. Subject to approval of a proposed interlocal agreement and funding availability, the Flood Control District will design, construct and maintain several detention basin cells on the property. Funding for design and construction of these basins is anticipated to continue through 2019.

2.4 Capital Program Strategy The CIP Portfolio represents the collection of projects that support the Flood Control District’s mission

statement. This portfolio of projects represents the Flood Control District’s efforts to address the needs of Harris County citizens, balanced with its financial capability.

2.4.1 Portfolio Management Managing a portfolio of projects with a five-year window:

• helps resolve conflicts for limited (funding) resources • ensures successful delivery of projects once they are initiated • provides long-term focus on the Flood Control District’s mission • improves internal and external communication and cooperation • helps improve community awareness and build public consensus for projects

Identifying capital projects and managing the portfolio of projects for implementation is a dynamic process throughout the year. Considerations include scheduling, the number of structures at risk, partnership opportunities and, ultimately, funding. Public demand for flood damage reduction also plays a role.

An important consideration for effective execution of each project is that a typical project takes several years to complete and delays between project life cycle stages may increase the total cost to complete a project. Managing the scheduling of project stages within the CIP Portfolio helps avoid undesirable increases in project costs and delays in completion. For example, a delay of several years between completing project design and beginning project construction usually means that some portion of the design work must be redone because of new utilities, road expansions, or land use changes. Another example involves environmental nationwide permits, which expire if construction does not start within one year of the permit issuance date. An expired permit can result in the need for new field investigations, or requirements for additional project mitigation to accommodate changes in regulations.


Additionally, a certain amount of flexibility in programming funds toward project implementation is appropriate when demand for funds exceeds current budgets, or when other immediate and unforeseen needs and opportunities arise. For example, at times throughout the year, our funding partnerships create opportunities to leverage project funds. To take advantage of such opportunities, it is important to have the flexibility to adjust expenditures.

2.4.2 Project Life Cycle Projects have a start and finish. A typical flood damage reduction project begins with the recognition

of a need or problem, coupled with the determination to provide a solution. All projects have a unique path from concept to solution, but they typically go through a series of sequential stages. As projects move through the stages, there are criteria or standards to meet, and milestones to achieve, prior to beginning succeeding stages. Projects are repeatedly reevaluated before moving to the next stage. This process ensures consistent quality in deliverables and helps manage the overall funding and scheduling of projects in the CIP Portfolio.

The magnitude and complexity of most flood damage reduction projects means that they typically take several years to complete all stages of Planning, Preliminary Engineering, Project Preparation, Design and Construction. When considering this long duration, it is important to remember that a single planning study may generate several projects for construction, and that all may share the same Planning, Preliminary Engineering, or Project Preparation stages. As an example, a single planning study for upper Hunting Bayou generated three detention basins and several channel and bridge construction projects, all anticipated to be constructed over the next ten years or more, depending on funding availability. While expected durations for each stage are described below, stages for some projects will be shorter or longer. Smaller, less complex projects do not follow all stages.

Planning A planning study is initiated when the details of an appropriate solution to a flooding problem are

not known. A completed planning study describes in detail the flooding problem being addressed, analyzes and evaluates options to reduce the magnitude of the problem, and provides a recommendation. When appropriate, the Flood Control District also works to identify opportunities for joint use and cost sharing on the design and construction of potential projects. This work effort may be simple or complex. A critical component of the planning study recommendation is the phasing or segmentation of the project into “pieces” that can be easily scheduled in the CIP Portfolio. The anticipated time to complete a planning study is 12-24 months, while planning for some federal projects has taken nearly ten years to complete.

Preliminary Engineering Once a solution has been identified, the Preliminary Engineering stage refines the technical

information needed to define benefits, costs and scheduling to help minimize uncertainty in managing the CIP Portfolio. A preliminary engineering report provides information from geotechnical and environmental investigations and surveys; identifies needed right of way (ROW) and utility adjustments; and includes a 30-50 percent plan set, cost estimate, schedule and


project history. Depending on the size and complexity of the recommended plan identified in the Planning stage, the preliminary engineering report may be developed during the Planning stage or may be developed as a separate effort. The Preliminary Engineering stage for most projects is anticipated to be 6-18 months. The duration of this stage is sometimes extended due to complications with the project’s Project Preparation stage.

Project Preparation With initiation of the Project Preparation stage, the project passes a special milestone in the

Flood Control District’s CIP process. Once the Project Preparation stage begins – for effective management of the CIP Portfolio, efficient usage of funding and timely completion of projects – funding should be consistently allocated to proceed without interruption through Design and Construction stages to completion of the project. The Project Preparation stage consists of three primary activities: acquisition of ROW, utility adjustments and environmental permitting. The number and complexity of ROW acquisitions, utility relocations and environmental permitting resolutions control the duration of the Project Preparation stage, with durations typically lasting from 6-36 months.

Design Design stage is a critical period where pieces of the previous work efforts translate into a detailed

design that can be built. This stage builds on the work products of the Preliminary Engineering stage and overlaps with the Project Preparation stage as close coordination with final Project Preparation stage activities is essential for development of the final construction plans. The final product of the Design stage is a set of documents necessary to bid and award a construction project. A project’s Design stage overlaps with final efforts of the Project Preparation stage and is expected to last 18-24 months.

Construction The purpose of the Construction stage is to construct the project in accordance with the

construction drawings, the project manual and Flood Control District specifications. The scheduled duration of the Construction stage of a project is related to the size and complexity of the project, and typically lasts from 6-24 months.

2.4.3 CIP Project Categories The Flood Control District divides and ranks its capital projects into nine Project Categories. Each

of the categories support a significant part of the Flood Control District’s Mission Statement. Projects that benefit the most people, and for which costs are shared with other government and community partners, generally receive a higher priority when allocating funding.


The CIP Portfolio may be aptly represented as a pyramid, where the pyramid shape is divided into project categories. Category 1 and 2, where the maximum amount of funds are allocated, form the broad base of the pyramid and represent the primary function of the Flood Control District.

A strong CIP Portfolio that can successfully address the needs of Harris County requires projects in various stages of the project lifecycle across all categories to compete for available local, state and federal funding. When funding shrinks, the pyramid is trimmed, but an attempt is made to include projects in different stages of the project lifecycle across all categories. Project selection and funding distribution is approved by Harris County Commissioners Court.


Description of CIP Portfolio Categories

Description

Major Federal Partnership Flood Damage Reduction Projects: These are generally “mega-projects” along the main channels of major watersheds in partnership with the federal government (the Corps and FEMA). These projects are the backbone for area drainage systems that benefit thousands of people and allow tributary and local drainage systems to function more efficiently. These are frequently, but not always, Corps of Engineer projects, with the Corps typically funding 50-75 percent of the project cost.

Federal Partnership Flood Damage Reduction Projects: These are smaller-scale projects that typically benefit a smaller area and help hundreds of people. This type of project includes FEMA Mitigation Grants that help reduce the number of insured losses experienced by the National Flood Insurance Program. These projects are frequently, but not always, FEMA partnerships, with FEMA typically providing 50-100 percent of the project cost.

Main Channel Flood Damage Reduction Project: Similar to Category 1 projects, but typically without a cost-sharing partner.

Tributary Flood Damage Reduction Projects: Similar to Category 2 projects, but typically without a cost-sharing partner.

HCFCD Major Maintenance Projects: Provides capital-type rehabilitation or upgrades to existing Flood Control District infrastructure (including acquisition of sufficient right of way to provide efficient maintenance access).

Floodplain Acquisition and Preservation: Acquisition of homes (“buyout”) or of undeveloped properties that are hopelessly deep in the floodplain, for conservation and reclamation purposes.

Frontier Projects: Support for projects in growth areas that meet the Flood Control District’s objectives of providing responsible regional public infrastructure.

Harris County Support Projects: Support for development of Flood Control District drainage infrastructure. These projects are frequently in conjunction with Harris County’s Road & Bridge Program or Precinct initiatives.

Local Participation Projects: Participation in appropriate local government flood damage reduction projects outside of Flood Control District right of way.

Category

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

June 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Annual Review


3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Flood Control District has identified a need to fund the Capital Improvement Program at a rate of

at least $200 million per year, however that amount is not currently available. Management of the CIP Portfolio is based on annual pay-as-you-go funding of $60 million for FY 2017 through FY 2021. This report documents the status of current funding, proposed projects for $60 million in FY 2017 funding, status of Project Brays funding, a five-year CIP spending $300 million ($60 million per year for five years), and a list of additional needed projects that total $1 billion ($200 million per year for five years).

3.1 Historical Summary of CIP Activity The Flood Control District was originally formed in 1937 to be a partner with the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers and to leverage federal funding to help the citizens of Harris County. Over the intervening decades, the Flood Control District has grown in experience and skill in leveraging partnerships and in managing the uncertainties that frequently delay project completion. The following graph illustrates the cumulative funding of the Flood Control District’s CIP since 2001.

Cumulative CIP Funding and Expenditures Since 2001


3.2 Summary of CIP Activity in Previous Fiscal Year Between March 1, 2015, and February 29, 2016, the Flood Control District received authorization from

Harris County Commissioners Court to award approximately $104.7 million for capital improvement projects, as detailed in the table below.

Capital Improvement Activity by Stage in FY2016

Note - Information as of February 2016


3.3 Drawdown of Funding As of February 29, 2016, the end of FY 2016, the Flood Control District had approximately $268.6 million

in CIP funds, with all but $16.5 million (6 percent) obligated against projects. Taking into consideration construction timelines and contingencies for utility adjustments and easement acquisitions, over 80% of these funds are programmed to be expended by the end of FY 2018.

A small percentage of funds are limited by contractual and other legal reasons to specific uses, and because the timing of when those funds may be spent for their designated use is dependent on unknown factors at the time the cash flow is projected.

The following tables provide a breakdown by percentage of how available funds are programmed toward the Flood Control District’s project categories and various project activities. Appendix A contains tables and project information sheets summarizing current CIP funding about ongoing projects. Each project sheet includes the location, description and funding status of the project. Project information sheets were not provided for projects that were being closed out or near to being closed out with less than $100,000 in funding remaining.

CIP Funding by Category

Note – Information as of February 2016


CIP Funding by Stage

Note – Information as of February 2016


3.4 Project Brays The Brays Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project, known as Project Brays, is the largest

flood damage reduction project undertaken by the Flood Control District to date. This multi-year, $480 million mega-project is a cooperative effort between the Flood Control District and the Corps that substantially reduces flooding risks in the Brays Bayou watershed. It encompasses more than 75 individual project components. A continuous stream of federal and local funding has allowed for steady progress since the project’s start in the mid-1990s. Final completion of Project Brays depends on federal funding in addition to local funding. An estimated completion date of 2021 for all project components assumes an annual funding level of $20 million from the Corps. An annual funding level of $5 million from the Corps delays the estimated completion date to 2035.

The Corps reimburses the Flood Control District for construction completed. In FY 2016, more than $25 million in invoices were submitted for reimbursement for seven component projects of Project Brays. In FY 2017, the following activities are occurring on Project Brays:

D100-00-00-E004 Channel conveyance improvement from Lidstone to Calhoun • Construction scheduled for completion mid-2016 • Estimated Cost - $11.7 million for construction • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for 2016

D100-00-00-E009 Channel conveyance improvement from Bertner to Buffalo Speedway • Construction scheduled to bid mid-2016 • Estimated Cost - $13 million for construction • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for 2017

D100-00-00-B038 Replacement of Union-Pacific Railroad Bridge • Design and construction are scheduled to begin in 2016 • Estimated Cost - $75,000 for design and $2 million for construction • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for 2017

D100-00-00-E019 Control structures for the upstream element • Construction scheduled to start mid-2016 • Estimated cost - $6.5 million • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for late 2017

D512-01-00-E207 Structural connections for Willow Waterhole Stormwater Detention Basin • Design ongoing in 2016; construction scheduled for mid-2017 • Estimated Cost - $500,000 for design; $10 million for construction • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for 2018

D512-01-00-E202 Excavation of compartments 1 and 6 at Willow Waterhole Detention Facility • Construction scheduled to be complete mid-2016 • Estimated Cost - $3.5 million • Submittal for reimbursement scheduled for late 2016


3.5 Recommended Projects For FY 2017 Funding As previously discussed, the Flood Control District manages the CIP Portfolio assuming that $60 million

in new funding is authorized yearly. On June 17, 2016, the Flood Control District submitted to Harris County Commissioners Court a recommendation of CIP projects to receive $60 million in new funding. Appendix B contains a copy of the recommendation letter. The following tables summarize the FY 2017 funding by category and stage.

Recommended Projects for FY 2017 Funding, by Category


Recommended Projects for FY 2017 Funding, by Stage


3.6 “Basis of Planning” Assumption for Five-Year CIP Funding Each year, funding is provided to the Flood Control District for its Capital Improvement Program by

Harris County Commissioners Court, based on consideration of available tax revenue, obligations and county priorities. In 2013, the Commissioners Court approved a “basis of planning” assumption that funding would be provided at $60 million annually for capital improvement projects. A reliable and predictable annual funding approach is important for efficient execution of Flood Control District activities and preferred to irregular funding appropriations. Primary benefits of a predictable funding program include:

• Steady and predictable progress at addressing flood damage reduction needs in the County.

• Continuity and sustained momentum in project delivery for large District programs that are carried as many projects over the years (“mega projects” like Project Brays).

• Minimal costly schedule delays associated with stopping and re-starting projects.

• Flexibility in project delivery that can more easily adapt to new partnership opportunities or a change in priorities.

• Predictability in staffing and privatized support activities through consultants and construction

contractors.


3.7 Proposed Projects for FY 2018-FY 2021 Appendix C lists the projects proposed for funding in the four outlying years (FY 2018 – FY 2021) of the

Five-Year CIP for FY 2017 and totaling $240 million ($60 million times four years). The following tables provide a breakdown by percentage of how available funds for those years are programmed toward the Flood Control District’s project stages and categories.

Projects for FY 2018-FY 2021, Proposed Funding by Category


Projects for FY 2018 - FY 2021, Proposed Funding by Stage

3.8 Proposed Projects for a Fully Funded Five-Year CIP A community’s approach to flood damage reduction is a function of the level of risk and overall cost

the community is willing to accept. The investment in excess of $12 billion is necessary to raise our flood damage reduction system to an overall 4 percent (25-year) level of protection, and $25 billion is necessary for a 1 percent (100-year) level of protection.

The Flood Control District recommends an annual funding stream of at least $200 million, which would allow the District to accomplish its mission of flood risk reduction over the next 60 years (4 percent (25-year) level of protection). This recommendation is based on the following considerations:

• An aggressive CIP is appropriate for the next several decades to manage and mitigate the natural threat of flooding.

• Benefits to the community from implementation of flood risk reduction projects extend beyond avoided flooding damages to economic development and increased property values, and to the opportunity for parklands and recreation areas as the green space serves multiple purposes.

• Regardless of the federal ability to financially participate, projects identified through partnerships with the federal government still afford some of the best benefits to flood risk reduction.

• When federal reimbursement or participation does occur, these projects bring at least 50 percent – and as much as 75-90 percent – financial participation.

• The recommended level of funding will allow the Flood Control District to capitalize on partnerships with local and state governments.


• The recommended level of funding will allow the Flood Control District to make appropriate investments in right of way to ensure the ability to implement projects in the future.

• At the recommended funding level, measured progress can be made for all project categories.

• Even at this funding level, “capital rationing” will occur because there are more projects (and the capability to produce them) than funding allows.

• There is an increased public awareness of the flooding threat and an expressed willingness to fund effective projects to reduce the threat.

• There is support for popular multi-use and quality-of-life initiatives on Flood Control District property (by appropriate sponsors), which the CIP helps enable.

• There is support from watershed and neighborhood organizations, the Greater Houston Partnership, environmental organizations and quality-of-life interests.

Appendix D contains a list of the proposed additional projects for a fully funded five-year CIP. These projects are in addition to those listed in Appendix A, B and C, and represent the difference between annual funding of $60 million vs $200 million. This list of proposed projects does not reflect anticipated reimbursements from the Corps of Engineers, FEMA, or other potential partners.

APPENDICESJune 2016 | Capital Improvement Program Annual Review


Appendix ACurrently Funded Projects

June 2016

Estimated Spending for Currently Funded Projects

Project ID Project Name Funding Balance (July 2016)

FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

A100-00-00-P004 Upper Clear Creek Alternative Evaluation Study $ 14,546.00 $ 14,546 $ - $ - $ - $ -

A100-00-00-R007Land Acquisition in support of the 2008 Texas Coastal Impact Assistance Program $ 864,500.00 $ 864,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -

A100-00-00-Y014 Clear Creek Flood Plain Management Plan $ 36,812.00 $ 36,812 $ - $ - $ - $ -

A120-00-00-C003 Mud Gully Channel Improvements $ 190,340.00 $ 46,830 $ 78,769 $ 64,741 $ - $ -

A520-03-00-E001 South Belt Stormwater Detention Basin $ 1,285,203.00 $ 1,245,040 $ 40,163 $ - $ - $ -

A520-03-00-E002South Belt Stormwater Detention Basin Excavation, Phase 2 $ 7,850,737.00 $ 1,690,089 $ 2,842,777 $ 2,842,777 $ 475,094 $ -

B100-00-00-R001 Armand Bayou Floodplain Preservation $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

C100-00-00-G001 SBFDR - Overall Support $ 100,000.00 $ 50,465 $ 49,535 $ - $ - $ -

C106-03-00-C002 Conveyance Improvements, Phase 2 $ 3,529,125.00 $ 1,625,945 $ 1,903,180 $ - $ - $ -

C106-03-00-C006 Phase 3 Channel Conveyance Improvements $ 4,295,007.00 $ 2,066,555 $ 2,228,452 $ - $ - $ -

C506-01-00-E002 E & R Agreement - Al Tapia $ 11,000.00 $ 6,451 $ 4,549 $ - $ - $ -

C506-02-00-E004 Crenshaw Stormwater Detention Basin $ 613,418.00 $ 613,418 $ - $ - $ - $ -

C506-02-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enchancement $ 196,000.00 $ 196,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

C506-03-00-E001 South Richey Stormwater Detention Basin $ 1,437,158.00 $ 1,002,776 $ 434,382 $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-B008 DS 102 - Lawndale Ave $ 151,256.00 $ 151,256 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-B038 DS 101a - Galveston Sub Railroad Bridge $ 44,500.00 $ 24,021 $ 20,479 $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-E004 DS 103 - Lidstone to Calhoun $ 4,922,661.00 $ 4,922,661 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-E009 DS 108, Bertner to Buffalo Speedway $ 15,436,576.00 $ 9,709,383 $ 5,727,193 $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-E019 Control Structures, DS19 $ 7,071,614.00 $ 6,671,914 $ 399,700 $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-G002 Brays - General Engineering Services $ 550,000.00 $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-G005 BBFFDRP - H & H Support $ 23,214.00 $ 23,214 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-G007 BBFFDRP - Control Survey $ 30,731.00 $ 30,731 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-G009 BBFFDRP - Architectural & Tree Survey $ 40,922.00 $ 40,922 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-G017 BBFFDRP - Recreation Feasibility Study $ 72,869.00 $ 72,869 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D100-00-00-V097Brays Bayou Federal Flood Control Project, Landscaping $ 22,234.00 $ 22,234 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D111-00-00-C001 Poor Farm Ditch Conveyance Improvements $ 7,394,555.00 $ 2,551,063 $ 4,290,958 $ 552,534 $ - $ -

D500-06-00-C001Repair and Modification to Existing Weir along Brays Bayou in Arthur Storey Park $ 685,000.00 $ 640,711 $ 44,289 $ - $ - $ -

D500-06-00-E002 DS 22 - Basin Improvements Arthur Storey Park $ 406,142.00 $ 406,142 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Note - Funding summary does not include CIIP projects in close out or with less than $10 thousand remaining in funding. Page 1 of 5 2016-08-19-0752



FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

D512-01-00-E202

Brays Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project, Willow Waterhole Detention Basin, DS 202, Comp 1 $ 626,202.00 $ 422,006 $ 204,196 $ - $ - $ -

D512-01-00-E207 Channel Control Structure, DS207 $ 952,938.00 $ 182,513 $ 306,992 $ 306,992 $ 156,440 $ -

D512-01-00-V087Brays Bayou Federal Flood Control Project, Landscaping $ 144,089.00 $ 144,089 $ - $ - $ - $ -

D512-01-00-W003 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement $ 111,202.00 $ 111,202 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E100-00-00-P004 White Oak Bayou Risk MAP Study $ 195,054.00 $ 53,174 $ 89,441 $ 52,439 $ - $ -

E101-00-00-P001Upper Little White Oak Bayou Alternatives Evaluation Study $ 382,717.00 $ 382,717 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E106-00-00-P001 Existing conditions model $ 68,840.00 $ 68,840 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E200-02-00-E001 North Canal Bypass $ 368,909.00 $ 368,909 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E200-02-00-R001 North Canal Bypass $ 7,672,584.00 $ 7,672,584 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E500-03-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancements $ 182,439.00 $ 182,439 $ - $ - $ - $ -

E500-05-00-Y002 Environmental Investigation $ 46,108.00 $ 31,170 $ 14,938 $ - $ - $ -

E500-21-00-E001Inwood Forest West Stormwater Detention Basin Excavation $ 293,405.00 $ 72,681 $ 122,252 $ 98,472 $ - $ -

E521-04-00-E001Inwood Forest East Stormwater Detention Basin Excavation $ 990,500.00 $ 245,364 $ 412,708 $ 332,428 $ - $ -

E535-01-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Mitigation $ 117,427.00 $ 117,427 $ - $ - $ - $ -

F101-06-00-C001 Channel Conveyance over Exxon Mobil Pipeline $ 17,859.00 $ 17,859 $ - $ - $ - $ -

G504-01-00-R001 Deer Park Interlocal for G504-01-00 $ 186,050.00 $ 186,050 $ - $ - $ - $ -

G504-01-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancements $ 49,076.00 $ 49,076 $ - $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-E003

Hunting Bayou Federal Flood Risk Management Project - Discrete Segment 103 Phase II Excavation along $ 2,148,387.00 $ 1,793,077 $ 355,310 $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-E004Hunting Bayou Federal Flood Risk Management Project - DS 104 $ 4,407,106.00 $ 1,801,021 $ 2,606,085 $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-G001Project Partnership Agreement between the Department of the Army and HCFCD $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-P003 Project Hunting - H&H Support $ 141,333.00 $ 141,333 $ - $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-R001 ROW Acquisition - Channel $ 603,848.00 $ 603,848 $ - $ - $ - $ -

H100-00-00-Y005 Project Development Report for Project Hunting $ 48,551.00 $ 48,551 $ - $ - $ - $ -




FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

H500-01-00-E003Hunting Bayou Federal Flood Risk Management Project - DS 203 $ 574,295.00 $ 142,263 $ 239,290 $ 192,743 $ - $ -

J100-00-00-R001 Spring Creek Greenway Acquisition Support $ 978,455.00 $ 669,794 $ 308,661 $ - $ - $ -

J700-03-00-Y001Harris County Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Rothwood Mitigation Site $ 240,344.00 $ 99,722 $ 140,622 $ - $ - $ -

K100-00-00-H009 Grantwood Acquisition $ 500,000.00 $ 394,545 $ 105,455 $ - $ - $ -

K100-00-00-P004 Cypress Creek Overflow Management Study $ 376,681.00 $ 220,918 $ 155,763 $ - $ - $ -

K163-00-00-E001 Channel Conveyance Improvements $ 550,363.00 $ 139,846 $ 235,225 $ 175,291 $ - $ -

K700-01-00-E001Phase 2 Site Improvements and Wetlands Construction $ 84,256.00 $ 14,592 $ 24,544 $ 24,544 $ 20,576 $ -

K700-01-00-E002Phase II Site Improvements and Wetland Construction $ 91,560.00 $ 91,560 $ - $ - $ - $ -

K700-01-00-Y001Harris County Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Katy-Hockley Mitigation Bank Site $ 320,193.00 $ 320,193 $ - $ - $ - $ -

L100-00-00-P002Little Cypress Creek Sub-Regional Frontier Program $ 2,184,926.00 $ 292,853 $ 492,587 $ 492,587 $ 492,587 $ 414,313

L112-01-00-E001Stormwater Conveyance Improvements for L112-01-00 Phase 1 $ 2,397,027.00 $ 1,161,060 $ 1,235,967 $ - $ - $ -

L500-01-00-E002 Zube Detention Basin Improvements $ 467,861.00 $ 220,230 $ 247,631 $ - $ - $ -

L500-06-00-E001 Mueschke East Detention Basin Improvements $ 10,000.00 $ 1,128 $ 1,897 $ 1,897 $ 1,897 $ 3,181

L500-09-00-E001 Schiel Stormwater Detention Basin Acquisition $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

L500-10-00-E001 Mueschke West Detention Basin Improvements $ 349,280.00 $ 46,815 $ 78,744 $ 78,744 $ 78,744 $ 66,232

L512-01-00-E001 Stormwater Detention Basin Improvements $ 335,097.00 $ 335,097 $ - $ - $ - $ -

L514-01-00-E003 Bauer-Hockley Detention Basin Improvements $ 1,100,000.00 $ 341,000 $ 573,571 $ 185,429 $ - $ -

M125-00-00-E001 Conveyance Improvements $ 1,894,169.00 $ 1,894,169 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P100-00-00-E011Greens Bayou Federal Flood Control Project, ROW & Utilities Coordination $ 807,500.00 $ 316,295 $ 491,205 $ - $ - $ -

P107-03-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement $ 52,450.00 $ 52,450 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P118-00-00-P004Halls Bayou Federal Feasibility Study Component Identification and Evaluation $ 262,445.00 $ 262,445 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P500-00-00-E001Excavation of Kuykendahl & Glen Forest Stormwater Detention Basins $ 57,382,857.00 $ 14,022,613 $ 23,586,422 $ 19,773,822 $ - $ -

P500-01-00-Y006Emergency Action Plan for Lower Greens Bayou Regional Detention Facility $ 11,660.00 $ 11,660 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P500-06-00-E003 Lauder Road Basin Improvements $ 700,000.00 $ 227,395 $ 382,485 $ 90,120 $ - $ -

P500-06-00-R003Castlewood Subdivision ROW Acquisition -Non-Voluntary $ 2,650,775.00 $ 1,099,844 $ 1,550,931 $ - $ - $ -




FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

P500-08-00-E001 Glen Forest Stormwater Detention Basin $ 947,531.00 $ 236,883 $ 398,443 $ 312,205 $ - $ -

P518-03-00-E002 Hall Park Stormwater Detention Basin $ 12,475,704.00 $ 3,269,599 $ 5,499,556 $ 3,706,550 $ - $ -

P518-04-00-W001 Revegetation for Environmental Enhancements $ 30,269.00 $ 30,269 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P518-10-00-E001Excavation of Little York Stormwater Detention Basin and Channel Conveyance Improvements $ 1,927,100.00 $ 616,786 $ 1,037,451 $ 272,864 $ - $ -

P545-01-00-E005 Kuykendahl Stormwater Detention Basin $ 686,506.00 $ 171,627 $ 288,681 $ 226,199 $ - $ -

P700-01-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement $ 50,000.00 $ 15,390 $ 25,887 $ 8,723 $ - $ -

P700-01-00-Y008Greens Bayou Wetlands Mitigation Bank Subdivision C $ 193,024.00 $ 193,024 $ - $ - $ - $ -

P700-01-00-Y009Greens Bayou Wetlands Mitigation Bank, Subdivision C $ 175,774.00 $ 38,067 $ 64,029 $ 64,029 $ 9,648 $ -

Q100-00-00-P002 Cedar Bayou Feasibility Study $ 140,282.00 $ 139,639 $ 643 $ - $ - $ -

Q700-01-00-Y001 Cedar Bayou Mitigation Bank $ 121,974.00 $ 16,349 $ 27,499 $ 27,499 $ 27,499 $ 23,129

T501-01-00-E002 Mason Creek Stormwater Detention Basin $ 397,179.00 $ 397,179 $ - $ - $ - $ -

T501-01-00-W001 Mason Creek Stormwater Detention Basin $ 238,000.00 $ 98,750 $ 139,250 $ - $ - $ -

U100-00-00-E008 Upper Langham Creek Frontier - Engineering $ 654,812.00 $ 271,172 $ 383,640 $ - $ - $ -

U100-00-00-G001Upper Langham Creek Frontier - Program Management $ 404,830.00 $ 318,290 $ 86,540 $ - $ - $ -

U100-00-00-PG912 Addicks Watershed Model Update $ 363,656.00 $ 363,656 $ - $ - $ - $ -

U100-00-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement $ 200,000.00 $ 48,874 $ 82,207 $ 68,919 $ - $ -

U101-00-00-P002 Lower Flood Risk Reduction Feasibility Study $ 153,370.00 $ 153,370 $ - $ - $ - $ -

U102-12-00-R001John Paul’s Landing Secondary Outfall to Bear Creek $ 2,200,000.00 $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

U132-00-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

U500-02-00-E001 Greenhouse Stormwater Detention Basin $ 61,599.00 $ 25,510 $ 36,089 $ - $ - $ -

U500-02-00-W001Revegetation and Environmental Compensatory Mitigation $ 97,064.00 $ 40,273 $ 56,791 $ - $ - $ -

U502-02-00-E001 John Paul's Landing Basin $ 134,908.00 $ 34,441 $ 57,931 $ 42,536 $ - $ -

U502-02-00-E003 E & R Agreement - Triad Sand $ 10,225.00 $ 2,760 $ 4,642 $ 2,823 $ - $ -

U502-02-00-E004John Paul's Landing Regional Stormwater Detention Basin Phase 2 Excavation $ 2,535,759.00 $ 2,456,517 $ 79,242 $ - $ - $ -

U502-02-00-E005 John Paul’s Landing E & R – Agreement #3 $ 46,000.00 $ 46,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

U520-01-00-E001Stabilization of Stormwater Detention Basin HCFCD Unit U520-01-00 $ 86,088.00 $ 42,749 $ 43,339 $ - $ - $ -

W100-00-00-X043 Memorial Park Demonstration Project $ 4,012,073.00 $ 3,993,669 $ 18,404 $ - $ - $ -




FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

W129-00-00-C003 Conveyance Improvements, Phase 3 $ 13,299,187.00 $ 6,127,226 $ 7,171,961 $ - $ - $ -

W140-00-00-X005 Spring Branch Creek Stabilization $ 499,353.00 $ 499,353 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-G801 Construction Material Testing $ 77,230.00 $ 33,994 $ 43,236 $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-G803 Geotechnical Consulting Services $ 21,666.00 $ 21,666 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-H042 Countywide General Acquisition $ 761,433.00 $ 83,282 $ 140,082 $ 140,082 $ 140,082 $ 257,905

Z100-00-00-H043 Grant Consultant Services $ 60,565.00 $ 60,565 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-H055Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Buyout Grant 2014 (application year) $ 1,345,846.00 $ 677,607 $ 668,239 $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-H059 2016 Tax Day Event Emergency Home Buyout $ 15,000,000.00 $ 5,054,348 $ 8,501,553 $ 1,444,099 $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-P001 H & H On-Call Services $ 138,387.00 $ 138,387 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-P002 2D Hydraulic Modeling Standards $ 136,686.00 $ 136,686 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-P003 Updates to Watershed Master Plan $ 63,800.00 $ 23,747 $ 39,943 $ 109 $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-P010 TSARP Appeal Support Program $ 20,830.00 $ 20,830 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-P013 LOMR Delegation Program $ 252,304.00 $ 252,304 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-PG009 Z100-00-00-PG009 $ 100,000.00 $ 15,657 $ 26,335 $ 26,335 $ 26,335 $ 5,339

Z100-00-00-Y011 Z100-00-00-Y011 $ 59,986.00 $ 59,986 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-Y019 Z100-00-00-Y019 $ 568,766.00 $ 94,215 $ 158,473 $ 158,473 $ 157,605 $ -

Z100-00-00-Y053 Z100-00-00-Y053 $ 349,607.00 $ 130,128 $ 218,879 $ 600 $ - $ -

Z100-00-00-Y073 CIP for Regulatory Compliance $ 163,231.00 $ 26,998 $ 45,411 $ 45,411 $ 45,411 $ -

Z100-00-00-Y082 Section 408 Reviews $ 17,971.00 $ 2,409 $ 4,052 $ 4,052 $ 4,052 $ 3,408

Z100-00-00-Y083 Harris County Support Projects $ 8,215,375.00 $ 1,422,774 $ 2,393,146 $ 2,393,146 $ 2,006,309 $ -

Z100-00-00-Y084 Local Participation Projects $ 1,115,000.00 $ 202,473 $ 340,565 $ 340,565 $ 231,397 $ -

Z100-00-00-Y088 Submerged Vehicle Removal Pilot Project $ 50,281.00 $ 50,281 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Total 222,464,169$ 108,337,986$ 80,874,423$ 35,069,008$ 4,309,556$ 773,506$

Cumlative Total 189,212,409$ 224,281,417$ 228,590,973$ 229,364,479$

Cumlative Percentage 47% 82% 98% 100% 100%



Appendix BProposed Projects for Funding in FY 17

June 2016

Table 1 - Capital Projects FY 2016-2017

Project ID Project Title Amount PrecinctA500-04-00-R001 Hughes Stormwater Detention Basin Acquisition 1,000,000$ 1B100-00-00-R001 RESTORE Act Projects Local Match Funding 2,000,000$ 2D500-06-00-C001 Repair & Modifications to Existing Weir along Brays Bayou in

Arthur Storey Park 350,000$ 3

F210-00-00-X004 ROW acquisition for Maintenance Project 750,000$ 2H100-00-00-B005 Kelley Street Bridge 400,000$ 1H100-00-00-E004 Channel Conveyance Improvements from Homestead

Stormwater Detention Basin to Liberty Road 1,500,000$ 1

J700-02-00-Y001 Bender Mitigation Bank Site 65,000$ 4K100-00-00-P004 Cypress Creek Overflow Management Study 150,000$ 3, 4L100-00-00-P002 Little Cypress Creek Sub-Regional Frontier Program

Management 400,000$ 3, 4

L500-09-00-E001 Schiel Stormwater Detention Basin 5,420,000$ 3L514-01-00-E003 Bauer-Hockley Stormwater Detention Basin 1,100,000$ 3P100-00-00-E011 Greens Bayou Federal Project 1,700,000$ 4P500-06-00-E003 Lauder Stormwater Detention basin 700,000$ 2P518-03-00-E002 Hall Park Stormwater Detention Basin 11,800,000$ 1, 2P518-10-00-E001 Channel Modification, Langley to Little York and Detention 1,330,000$ 2P700-01-00-Y008 Greens Bayou Wetlands Mitigation Bank Project, Subdivision

C 65,000$ 4

Q100-00-00-P002 Cedar Bayou Master Planning and Mitigation Evaluation 300,000$ 2Q700-01-00-Y001 Cedar Bayou Mitigation Bank Evaluation 150,000$ 2T501-01-00-W001 Mason Creek Stormwater Detention Basin Revegetation and

Environmental Enhancements 370,000$ 3

U100-00-00-E008 Upper Langham Creek Frontier Program Engineering & Survey 750,000$

3

U100-00-00-FP001 Upper Langham Creek Frontier Program Excavation Project 100,000$ 3U100-00-00-G001 Upper Langham Creek Frontier Program Management 200,000$ 3U100-00-00-W001 Upper Langham Creek Frontier Program Revegetation and

Environmental Enhancements 300,000$ 3

U132-00-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancements 100,000$ 3U500-02-00-E001 Greenhouse Stormwater Detention Basin Construction Phase

1 & Control Structure 250,000$ 3

U500-02-00-E002 Greenhouse Stormwater Detention Basin Construction Phase 2 100,000$

3

U500-02-00-W001 Greenhouse Stormwater Detention Basin Revegetation and Environmental Enhancements 100,000$

3

U502-02-00-E004 John Paul's Landing Stormwater Detention Basin Phase 2 Excavation 100,000$

3

U520-01-00-E001 U520-01-00 Stormwater Detention Basin 1,400,000$ 4W100-00-00-P007 Buffalo Bayou Conveyance and Grade Stablization at

Commerce Street 1,250,000$ 2

W140-00-00-X005 Spring Branch Creek Stabilization 4,000,000$ 3Z100-00-00-FP001 Major Maintenance Improvements, County wide 1,000,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-FP003 Countywide Planning Studies 300,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-G00X Project Partnership Agreements - USACE and HCFCD 100,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-H042 Countywide General Acquisition 5,800,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-H058 Home Buyout Grant Applications 1,500,000$ ALL

2016-06-17-1428

Table 1 cont. - Capital Projects FY 2016-2017

Project ID Project Title Amount PrecinctZ100-00-00-H059 Tax Day Flood Buyout 5,000,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-PG009 H&H Support Activities 100,000$ ALLZ100-00-00-Y083 Harris County Support Projects 4,000,000$ ALLContingency Contingency 4,000,000$ ALLGrand Total 60,000,000$

2016-06-17-1428


Appendix CProposed Projects for Funding FY 18-21

June 2016

Proposed Projects FY2018-FY2021

Page 1 of 3 2016-07-27-0932

PROJECT ID PROJECT TITLE Stage FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021A120-00-00-C003 Channel Conveyance Improvements (Beamer Rd.

Ditch)Construction 4,400,000$ -$ -$ -$

A500-04-00-FP001 Stormwater Detention Basin on Clear Creek Construction -$ -$ -$ 5,400,000$ A500-04-00-FP001 Stormwater Detention Basin on Clear Creek Design -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ B100-00-00-FP002 Armand Bayou Feasibility Study Development -$ -$ -$ -$ B100-00-00-FP002 Armand Bayou Feasibility Study Planning -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ B100-00-00-FP002 Armand Bayou Feasibility Study ROW -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ B500-04-00-E003 Site Stabilization of Red Bluff Regional Stormwater

Detention BasinConstruction 250,000$ -$ -$ -$

D111-00-00-C001 Poor Farm Ditch Conveyance Improvements Construction -$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ D118-00-00-FP001 Keegans Bayou Planning Study Design -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ D118-00-00-FP001 Keegans Bayou Planning Study Planning -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ D118-00-00-FP001 Keegans Bayou Planning Study ROW -$ -$ 5,000,000$ -$ E100-00-00-G001 Project Partnership Agreement - USACE and HCFCD Support P 200,000$ 200,000$ -$

E200-02-00-E001 North Canal Bypass Construction -$ -$ 3,000,000$ 6,000,000$ E200-02-00-E001 North Canal Bypass Design -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ E200-02-00-R001 North Canal Bypass ROW -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ E521-04-00-E001 Inwood Forest East Stormwater Detention Basin Construction -$ -$ 5,000,000$ -$ E521-04-00-E001 Inwood Forest East Stormwater Detention Basin Design 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ H100-00-00-B005 Kelley Street Bridge Construction 1,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ H100-00-00-B006 Replacement of UP Englewood RR Bridges Design -$ -$ 800,000$ -$ H100-00-00-E005 Project Hunting - Homestead to Kelly Construction -$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ H100-00-00-E005 Project Hunting - Homestead to Kelly Design 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ H100-00-00-E006 Project Hunting - Liberty to End of Project Design -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ H100-00-00-G001 Project Partnership Agreement - USACE and HCFCD Support 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$

H103-00-00-FP001 H103 Study Planning 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ H500-01-00-E003 Homestead Stormwater Detention Basin, Phase 3 Construction 5,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ J700-03-00-Y001 Rothwood Mitigation Bank Site Construction 2,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ K163-00-00-E001 Conveyance Improvements Timber Lake Estates Construction 2,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ K700-01-00-FP001 Katy-Hockley Mitigation Bank Site Construction 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ L100-00-00-P002 Little Cypress Creek Sub-Regional Frontier Program

PMDesign 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$


Page 2 of 3 2016-07-27-0932

PROJECT ID PROJECT TITLE Stage FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021L100-00-00-P002 Little Cypress Creek Sub-Regional Frontier Program

PMROW -$ 150,000$ -$ 700,000$

L500-06-00-E001 Mueschke East Stormwater Detention Basin Construction -$ 190,000$ -$ -$ L500-06-00-E001 Mueschke East Stormwater Detention Basin Design 600,000$ 20,000$ -$ -$ L500-06-00-E001 Mueschke East Stormwater Detention Basin ROW -$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ L500-09-00-E001 Little Cypress Creek Regional Detention Basin ROW -$ 5,100,000$ -$ -$ L500-09-00-E001 Schiel Stormwater Detention Basin ROW 700,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ L500-10-00-E001 Mueschke West Stormwater Detention Basin ROW 2,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 2,000,000$ L500-XX-00-E001 Regional Stormwater Detention Basin Design -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ L500-XX-00-E001 Regional Stormwater Detention Basin ROW -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ P100-00-00-E011 Greens Bayou Federal Project ROW 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ P100-00-00-G001 Project Partnership Agreement - USACE and HCFCD Design -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$

P118-00-00-FP001 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements Construction -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ P118-00-00-FP001 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements Design -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ P118-00-00-FP001 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements ROW 2,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ P118-00-00-FP002 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements Construction -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ P118-00-00-FP002 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements Design -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ P118-00-00-FP002 Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements ROW 2,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ P500-04-00-E003 Aldine-Westfield Stormwater Detention basin Construction -$ -$ -$ 10,790,000$ P500-04-00-E003 Aldine-Westfield Stormwater Detention basin Design -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ P500-04-00-E003 Aldine-Westfield Stormwater Detention basin ROW 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ P500-06-00-E003 Lauder Stormwater Detention basin, Phase 1 Construction -$ -$ 5,000,000$ -$ P500-06-00-E003 Lauder Stormwater Detention basin, Phase 1 Design -$ 500,000$ -$ 7,500,000$ P500-06-00-E003 Lauder Stormwater Detention basin, Phase 2 Construction 5,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ P518-10-00-E001 Channel Modification, Langley to Little York and

DetentionConstruction 1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$

U100-00-00-E008 Engineering, Survey, & Contribution > Fee Funded Items

Construction 750,000$ 600,000$ 200,000$ -$

U100-00-00-FP001 Langham Creek Frontier Program Excavation Project Construction 1,000,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$

U100-00-00-G001 Program Management/Design Design 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ U100-00-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement Construction 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ U102-00-00-FP Cypress Overflow Conveyance Improvements ROW -$ 5,000,000$ 2,000,000$ -$


Page 3 of 3 2016-07-27-0932

PROJECT ID PROJECT TITLE Stage FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021U132-00-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Enhancement Construction 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ U500-02-00-W001 Revegetation and Environmental Compensatory

MitigationConstruction 200,000$ 200,000$ 60,000$ -$

Z100-00-00-FP001 HCFCD Major Maintenance Construction 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ Z100-00-00-H042 Countywide General Acquisition ROW 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$ Z100-00-00-PG00X Countywide Feasibility Studies Planning 1,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Z100-00-00-Y083 Cypress Rose Hill Drainage - Phase II Construction 1,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ Z100-00-00-Y083 Harris County PIC Support Projects Construction 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ zz> Contingency Contingency (Note - funded amount; not the available

amount)NA 3,550,000$ 4,640,000$ 3,740,000$ 4,010,000$

Total 60,000,000$ 60,000,000$ 60,000,000$ 60,000,000$


Appendix DFuture Projects

June 2016

Future Projects

PROJECT ID PROJECT TITLE Planning Preparation Design Construction Project TotalsA100-00-00-FP Clear Creek Federal Project -$ 2,000,000$ 500,000$ 5,000,000$ 7,500,000$ A500-04-00-FP Stormwater Detention Basin on Clear Creek -$ -$ 250,000$ 6,000,000$ 6,250,000$ A520-03-00-FP001 Phase 3 excavation -$ -$ 500,000$ 6,000,000$ 6,500,000$ D100-00-00-FP Brays Bayou Federal Flood Damage

Reduction Project - bridge replacements -$ -$ 800,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,800,000$

E100-00-00-FP White Oak Federal Project -$ 4,000,000$ 2,500,000$ 20,000,000$ 26,500,000$ E101-00-00-FP001 Little White Oak Conveyance Improvements -$ 4,000,000$ 1,250,000$ 12,000,000$ 17,250,000$ E115-00-00-FP001 Brickhouse Gully Conveyance Improvements -$ 2,500,000$ 250,000$ 3,500,000$ 6,250,000$

E121-00-00-FP Vogel Creek Conveyance Project -$ 250,000$ 500,000$ 2,500,000$ 3,250,000$ E200-02-00-FP North Canal Bypass -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 10,000,000$ 11,500,000$ E521-02-00-FP Vogel Creek Detention Basin -$ -$ 250,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,250,000$ F101-06-00-FP Channel over Exxon Pipeline -$ 1,000,000$ 250,000$ 2,000,000$ 3,250,000$ H100-00-00-FP Project Hunting -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 25,000,000$ 27,500,000$ L100-00-00-FP Little Cypres Creek Sub-Regional Frontier

Program -$ 3,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 35,000,000$ 41,500,000$

P118-00-00-FP Halls Bayou Conveyance Improvements 500,000$ 20,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 20,000,000$ 44,000,000$ P518-00-00-FP Halls Bayou Stormwater Detention Basin -$ 20,000,000$ 750,000$ 15,000,000$ 35,750,000$ Q100-00-00-FP Cedar Bayou Conveyance Improvements -$ 5,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 15,000,000$ 21,500,000$ U100-00-00-FP Upper Langham Creek Frontier -$ 3,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 35,000,000$ 41,500,000$ Z100-00-00-FP001 HCFCD Major Maintenance -$ -$ -$ 20,000,000$ 20,000,000$ Z100-00-00-FP002 Wetland Creation and Banking Site -$ 3,000,000$ 500,000$ 3,000,000$ 6,500,000$ Z100-00-00-G00X Project Partnership Agreement - USACE and

HCFCD -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$

Z100-00-00-H042 Countywide General Acquisition -$ 40,000,000$ -$ -$ 40,000,000$ Z100-00-00-PG00X Countywide Feasibility Studies 10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ Z100-00-00-Y083 Harris County PIC Support Projects -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ Z100-00-00-Y084 Local Participation including City of Houston -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

zz> Contingency Contingency -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,850,000$ Stage Totals 10,500,000$ 107,750,000$ 24,300,000$ 262,000,000$ 431,400,000$

2017-07-27-1415

Download the Annual CIP Report for FY2017 (June 2016)

Documents

Transcript of Download the Annual CIP Report for FY2017 (June 2016)