Double Track Ipoh Padang Besar Conclusion.docx
-
Upload
abdul-rahman-hilmi -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Double Track Ipoh Padang Besar Conclusion.docx
-
8/14/2019 Double Track Ipoh Padang Besar Conclusion.docx
1/2
Conclusion & Recommendation
Some Delays in EDTP project are considered inevitable and some are due to poor action and
judgement. When the contract bidding was awarded to MMC Gamuda in 2003 which was
supposed to have ended by 2001, this has caused delay to entire project and this inevitable as
political factor might have been involved.
The incident of breakage of Titi Hitam river bund is due to poor judgement and action by
contractor which has caused delay upon the project. Their careless action has caused Penang
state government to issue a cease due to a solid reason to protect the civilians.
Rise of fuel and building material price is a sign of poor judgement and estimation on the
parties, contractor and client which should have foreseen this possibility since the project
takes a period of more than a year. Prices fluctuate annually and this has caused delay
whereby budget needs to be recalculated and project is halted.
The unsettled land acquisition during the construction is also due to poor judgement as this
should have been addressed and completed during the planning stage. Once all the required
land is acquired and civilian that needed to be relocated have been compensated, only then
the project have a green light to proceed. Land prices hike up annually, this affects the overall
budget if land acquisition is not settled prior to starting the project. Once the project has
started, land owners will surely take this opportunity of demanding for a higher price since
the government has started the project and cancelling it due to high price of land is not
exactly a wise option for major project like EDTP project.
Civilian resettlement was reported still has not been settled in the middle of project, this delayimposes an ethical issue and may spark the rage of Malaysian who sees the one being
relocated as the oppressed if they were not to be relocated and compensated appropriately.
In conclusion, the EDTP project delays are generally due to human mistakes, poor judgement
and estimation on planning and costing, disputes between major players of the project and
some political influence which we cannot study them clearly due to vague and inconsistency
of reports.
-
8/14/2019 Double Track Ipoh Padang Besar Conclusion.docx
2/2
Recommendation
Political influence although is not possible to be left out completely in a nationwide scale
project where major players from government and companies are involved, it can be put
into minimal by having an external body which has no interest in any of the involved parties
monitoring the cleanliness and transparency of the project especially when important
processes such as tendering is going on.
Careful and more stringent protocol may be applied to contractor during executing of the
work to avoid any unwanted accident which can be viewed as irresponsible action.
Prevention is better than rectification as on the project of this scale, all eyes will be on it,
and any sort of incident will be judged and criticized by the news and general people, this
affects the harmony of one country.
All preliminary processes prior to commencement of project needs to be fully settled, andthis rule has to be strictly followed by all parties otherwise we may anticipate a major delay
in future. This is proven in the case of land acquisition and civilian relocation problems
which are still in negotiation process despite the project have started more than 20%. This is
quite unacceptable in the text of construction project flowchart.
The government should employ several financial analysts to predict and foresee the
fluctuation of prices of involved material and labour as the project takes more than 3 years
and during these period, prices are expected to fluctuate therefore an agreement has to be
made between client and contractor to compensate for these fluctuations.