Dose–Response Relationships

download Dose–Response Relationships

of 20

Transcript of Dose–Response Relationships

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    1/20

    DoseResponse Relationships

    WESAM RADHI KADHUM

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    2/20

    Graded doseresponse relations

    The dose-responserelationship, or exposure-

    response relationship,

    descr

    ibes the change in effecton an organism caused by

    differing levels of exposure (or

    doses) to a stressor (usually a

    chemical) after a certainexposure time.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    3/20

    1. Potency: Two important properties of drugs can bedetermined by graded doseresponse curves.

    The first is potency, a measure of the amount ofdrug necessary to produce an effect of a givenmagnitude.For a number ofreasons, the concentration producingan effect that is fifty percent of the maximum is usedto determine potency; it commonly designated as theEC

    50.

    Half maximal effective concentration (EC50)

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    4/20

    In this figure, the EC50

    for Drugs A and B areindicated.

    Drug A is more potent

    than Drug B because

    less Drug A is needed

    to obtain 50 percent

    effect.

    Thus, therapeutic

    preparations of drugs

    will reflect the potency.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    5/20

    For example, candesartan and irbesartan are

    angiotensinr

    eceptor

    blocker

    s that ar

    e usedalone or in combination to treat hypertension.

    Candesartan is more potent than irbesartan

    because the dose range for candesartan is 4 to

    32 mg, as compared to a dose range of 75 to

    300 mg for irbesartan.

    Candesartan would be Drug A and irbesartan

    would be Drug B.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    6/20

    Semilogarithmic plots are oftenemployed, because the range ofdoses (or concentrations) mayspan several orders ofmagnitude.

    By plotting the log of theconcentration, the completerange of doses can be graphed.

    As shown in Figure B, the

    curves become sigmoidal inshape. It is also easier tovisually estimate the EC50.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    7/20

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    8/20

    A dr

    ug with gr

    eater

    efficacy is moretherapeutically beneficialthan one that is more

    potent. This figure shows theresponse to drugs of differing potency and

    efficacy.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    9/20

    3. Drugreceptor binding (Affinity) :

    We can mathematically express the

    relationship between the percentage (or

    fraction) of bound receptors and the drugconcentration:

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    10/20

    Where [D] = the concentration of free drug;

    [DR] = the concentration of bound drug; [Rt] =the total concentration of receptors, and is

    equal to the sum of the concentrations of

    unbound (fr

    ee)r

    eceptor

    s and boundr

    eceptor

    sand; Kd = [D][R]/[DR], and is the dissociation

    constant for the drug from the receptor.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    11/20

    The value ofKd can be used to determine the

    affinity of a drug for its receptor.

    Affinity describes the strength of the

    interaction (binding) between a ligand and its

    receptor. The higher the Kd value, the weaker the

    interaction and the lower the affinity.

    The converse occurs when a drug has a low Kd. The binding of the ligand to the receptor is

    strong, and the affinity is high.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    12/20

    As the concentration of freedrug increases, the ratio of

    the concentrations of boundreceptors to total receptorsapproaches unity.

    Doses are often plotted on alogarithmic scale, because therange from lowest to highestconcentrations of doses oftenspans several orders ofmagnitude.

    It is important to note thesimilarity between thesecurves and those representingthe relationship between

    dose and effect.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    13/20

    4. Relationship of binding to effect: The binding

    of the drug to its receptor initiates events thatultimately lead to a measurable biologic

    response.

    The mathematical model that describes d

    rugconcentration and receptor binding can be

    applied to dose (drug concentration) and

    response (or effect), providing the following

    assumptions are met:

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    14/20

    1)The magnitude of the response is proportional

    to the amount of receptors bound oroccupied.

    2) The Emax occurs when all receptors are bound.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    15/20

    5. A

    gonists: If a dr

    ug binds to ar

    eceptor

    andproduces a biologic response that mimics theresponse to the endogenous ligand, it isknown as an agonist.

    For example, phenylephrine is an agonist at1-adrenoceptors, because it produceseffects that resemble the action of theendogenous ligand, norepinephrine.

    Explain How?

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    16/20

    6. Antagonists: Antagonists are drugs that

    decrease the actions of another drug orendogenous ligand.

    Antagonism may occur in several ways. Many

    antagonists act on the identical receptor

    macromolecule as the agonist.

    Antagonists, however, have no intrinsic

    activity and, therefore, produce no effect by

    themselves.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    17/20

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    18/20

    Plotting the effect of thecompetitive antagonist

    characteristically causes a

    shift of the agonist dose

    response curve to the right.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    19/20

    Home Work

    Differentiate between:

    Functional antagonism and Partial agonists

    References: Basic and clinical pharmacology / edited by Bertram G. Katzung;

    associate editors, Susan B. Masters, Anthony J. Trevor. 11th ed New

    York: McGraw Hill, 2009.

    Goodman and Glimans manual of pharmacology and therapeutics /

    Laurence Brunton[ et al.]. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 2008.

    Loppincotts illustrated reviews Pharmacology / Richard A.Harvey,

    Pamela C.Champe. -- 4rd edPhiladelphia Lippincott Williams and

    Wilkins, 2009.

  • 8/3/2019 DoseResponse Relationships

    20/20

    END