Dose-Response

22
Dose-Response ENVR430 Nov 09, 2009 Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp. 18-27(6 th Edn) Chapter 2, pp. 19-26 (7 th Edn) Timbrell Chapter 2, pp. 7-25 (3 rd

description

Dose-Response. ENVR430 Nov 09, 2009. Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp. 18-27(6 th Edn) Chapter 2, pp. 19-26 (7 th Edn) Timbrell Chapter 2, pp. 7-25 (3 rd Edn). Dose-Response. Increasing Response. 0. Increasing Dose. The J-shaped curve (hormesis). Increasing Response. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Dose-Response

Page 1: Dose-Response

Dose-Response

ENVR430

Nov 09, 2009

Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp. 18-27(6th Edn) Chapter 2, pp. 19-26 (7th Edn)

Timbrell Chapter 2, pp. 7-25 (3rd Edn)

Page 2: Dose-Response
Page 3: Dose-Response

Dose-Response

Increasing Dose

Increasing Response

0

Page 4: Dose-Response

The J-shaped curve(hormesis)

Increasing Dose

Incr

easi

ng R

espo

nse

Page 5: Dose-Response

Dose-Response

Dose

Increasing Response

0Threshold

Page 6: Dose-Response

Threshold Dose • No effect level

• Response at low dose is so low as to be insignificant – A SAFE DOSE

• NEL, No Effects Level

• NOEL, No Observed Effects Level

• NOAEL, No Observed Adverse Effects Level

Some Acronyms

The basis for regulation

Page 7: Dose-Response

Food Safety, Environmental • ADI, Acceptable Daily Intake

– AWI, AMI etc• TDI, Tolerable Daily Intake• MCL, Maximum Contaminant Level (SDWA)• SF, UF, MF: safety, uncertainty, modifying factors

• TLV, Threshold Limit Value• TLV-C, ceiling level• STEL, Short-term exposure limit• TWA, Time-Weighted Average (8h day, 40 h week)

Occupational exposure limits

Page 8: Dose-Response

Above the threshold

• Dose-response is linear ? y = ax + b

• Dose-response is not linear

Defining the shape of the dose-response curve

Theoretical treatment: Assume Quantal or dichotomous response

Page 9: Dose-Response

Continuous response eg DNA Binding

Page 10: Dose-Response

Quantal response Dichotomous response

• Corresponds to “occupied receptor”

• Examples: Mortality, Tumor incidence

• Assumes normal (Gaussian) distribution

• Maximum 100% affected

Page 11: Dose-Response

e = Emax * [T] / (KT + [T])

Where e = response or effect e

Emax = maximum response

[T] = concentration of toxicant

KT = the dissociation constant of the toxicant/receptor complex

Page 12: Dose-Response

When [T] = 0, e = 0

When all receptors are occupied:

e = Emax

Page 13: Dose-Response

Dose (mg/kg)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

% r

esp

on

se

0

20

40

60

80

100 Dose-response - linear

Page 14: Dose-Response

Dose (mg/kg)0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

% r

espo

nse

0

20

40

60

80

100 Dose-response - log

Page 15: Dose-Response
Page 16: Dose-Response

LD50 Lethal dose

LC50 Lethal concentration

ED50 Effective dose

Page 17: Dose-Response

Dose (mg/kg)

0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

% r

esp

on

se

0

20

40

60

80

100

Page 18: Dose-Response

Dose (mg/kg)0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

% r

espo

nse

0

20

40

60

80

100 Dose-response - log

Page 19: Dose-Response

Some Acute Oral LD50 Values

Category Dose Species Chemical(mg/kg body weight)

Practically nontoxic15 000

Slightly toxic 10 000 Mouse Ethanol 5 000

Moderately toxic 4 900 Rat Glyphosate 750 Rat

Atropine 500

Highly toxic 250 Rat Carbaryl 50

Extremely toxic 13 Rat Parathion 5

Supertoxic 3 Rat Warfarin 0.4 Duck

Aflatoxin B1

Page 20: Dose-Response

Species LD50 (ug/kg body wt)

Guinea-pig 0.5-2

Rat 22-100

Mouse 114-284

Rabbit 10-115

Chicken 25-50

Rhesus monkey < 70

Dog >30-100

Hamster 5051

Species differences in the acute toxicity of dioxin*

*Dioxin: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorobenzdioxin: TCDD

Page 21: Dose-Response

Oral LD50 Values (mg/kg)

Males Females

Mice 127 137

Rats 355 247

Hamsters 230 249

Rabbits 246 224

Test Compound: Caffeine

Page 22: Dose-Response

Other toxic effects

• Acute / chronic

• Reversible / irreversible

• Immediate / delayed

• Idiosyncratic - hypersensitivity

• Local / systemic

• Target organs