Academic Affairs and Enrollment Management 2nd Annual Progress Report.
Domestic Enrollment >> Progress Report AUGUST 15, 2014.
-
Upload
percival-johnson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Domestic Enrollment >> Progress Report AUGUST 15, 2014.
DomesticEnrollment
>> Progress ReportAUGUST 15, 2014
Enrollment
SUMMER State-Funded FTEs
2014: 1,835
2013: 2,001
2012: 1,972
2011: 2,002
Source: SCC Enrollment Data
Consistent Pattern
Source: SCC Enrollment Data
Overview
UnderstandingWhat do we know?What do we not know?
ActionWhat have we done?Where are we headed?
Context: History
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
State-Funded FTEs
4888 4649 4446 4636 4399 4702 4938 4654 4623 4629 4620
50015002500350045005500
Total State-Funded FTEs Since 2003
Source: SCC Enrollment Data
Context: Comparisons
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Edmonds 7139 7653 7022 6852 6259
Everett 7093 7615 6200 6151 6242
Shoreline 4816 4678 4532 4409 4272
North Seattle 4208 4225 3953 3814 3739
Lake Washington 3538 3635 3257 3120 3513
Cascadia 2211 2345 2312 2239 2277
500
1500
2500
3500
4500
5500
6500
7500
8500
Fall Q
uart
er
Dom
esti
c Enro
llm
ent
(FTEs)
Consistent 3% decrease per year
Source: SBCTC Fall Quarter Enrollment and Staffing Reportshttp://www.bothell.washington.edu/about/facts
Context: Community
WA State Shoreline CC King County Snohomish County
White 0.71 0.6 0.636565476427689
0.731542516329348
Multiple/Other 0.04 0.02 0.0513489817877496
0.0493754740558445
Hispanic/Latino 0.12 0.09 0.09203463117204 0.0929231306511549
Black/African-American 0.04 0.1 0.0607968357709321
0.0225309534593117
Asian/Pacific Islander 0.08 0.17 0.153770473837325
0.0954318751057247
American Indian/Alaska Native
0.02 0.02 0.00548360100426414
0.00819605039861617
5%
25%
45%
65%
85%
Source: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
Context: Community
Cascadia Edmonds Everett Shoreline Lake Wash-ington
Seattle North
White 0.636145541783287
0.551511677890815
0.632439295349945
0.595375722543353
0.661776691116545
0.599413366855227
Other 0.0195921631347461
0.00401203610832498
0.0307887636883034
0.0175474814203138
0.0184732409671285
0.0331028703121726
Latino Hispanic
0.131547381047581
0.151884224100874
0.146167275035709
0.0914533443435178
0.110024449877751
0.0802430337314058
African American
0.0359856057576969
0.0802407221664995
0.051737819393747
0.100536746490504
0.0366748166259169
0.103079824010057
Asian/Pa-cific Is-lander
0.153138744502199
0.194010603238286
0.106967148071735
0.174029727497936
0.158109209453953
0.163628745024094
Native American
0.0235905637744902
0.0183407364951999
0.0318996984605618
0.0210569777043765
0.0149415919587069
0.0205321600670438
5%
25%
45%
65%
85%
Source: SBCTC Fall Quarter Enrollment and Staffing Reports
Context: SBCTC Analysis
Washington State Population and Employment Data2010-2030
WACTC Accountability and Allocation Task ForceSeptember 2013
Context: Demographics
2009 2010 % 2011 % 2012 % 2015 %
15 – 19
46,518 49,226 5.8 47,456 -3.6
46,909 -1.2
46,939 0.1
20 - 24 43,391 44,970 3.6 45,915 2.1 47,737 4.0 45,360 -5.0
25 - 34 99,444 100,655
1.2 100,360
-0.3
103,118
2.7 103,971
0.8
Population by age: Snohomish County
2009 2010 % 2011 % 2012 % 2015 %
15 – 19
111,118
117,227
5.5 112, 410 -4.1
114,224
1.6 115,198
0.9
20 - 24 121,196
130,776
7.9 133,214 1.9 134,183
0.7 142,056
5.9
25 - 34 327,759
314,288
-4.1
323,899 3.1 331,544
2.4 307,967
-7.1
Population by age: King County
Source: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
SCC Age Demographics
2009 2010 % 2011 % 2012 % 2013 %
< 20 1,734 1,668 - 3.8
1,553 -6.9
1,457 -6.2
1,528 4.9
20 - 24 1,777 1,724 -3.0 1,642 -4.8
1,705 3.8 1,636 -4.0
25 - 34 1,574 1,651 4.9 1,657 0.4 1,579 -4.7
1,435 -9.1
35 + 1,998 1,533 -23.
3
1,451 -5.3
1,368 -5.7
1,345 -1.7
Total 7,243 6,651 -8.2 6,329 -4.8
6,152 -2.8
5,969 -3.0
SCC Domestic Enrollment (Headcount), Fall to Fall, by Age
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
King 67% 67% 67% 66% 65%
Snohomish 27% 27% 27% 29% 31%
Other 6% 6% 6% 5% 4%
King: “In-District” 22% 22% 23% 22% 22%
% of SCC Domestic Enrollment (Headcount), Fall to Fall, by County
Source: SCC Enrollment Data
Context: District
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Shorecrest High School 1543 1491 1404 1358 1276
Shorewood High School 1705 1688 1600 1473 1490
Ballard 1640 1632 1613 1643 1620
Edmonds/Woodway 1785 1780 1722 1624 1644
Mountlake Terrace 1537 1479 1372 1284 1225
Inglemoor (Northshore SD) 1880 1795 1762 1632 1633
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
Num
ber
of
gra
duate
s
Shorecrest: 3.4 - 6.0% decrease per year
Shorewood: big drops (5.2% , 09-10; 7.9% 10-11)
Source: OSPI Washington State Report Card
Context: SCC District
Source: Education Research & Data Center, High School Feedback Report
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012Shorewood Shorecrest
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
32% 32% 28% 27% 28% 24% 25% 23%
11%16%
12% 10%16%
18% 14% 18%
43% 36%
40% 44%
42% 42%40%
46%
15% 17% 20% 19%14% 15%
21%13%
Distribution of college-bound graduates from Shoreline School District high schools
Out of StateWA 4-yearOther WA 2-yearShoreline CC
Context: Workforce
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Snohomish
King
Fall 2009 10.5% 9.2%
Fall 2010 10.3% 9.2%
Fall 2011 8.9% 8.1%
Fall 2012 6.9% 8.0%
Fall 2013 5.8% 5.2%Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Context: Workforce
Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 -
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
331 350 322
335 295
1,707 1,644
1,555 1,682
1,586
417 443 489 613
764
2,105
1,824 1,788 1,825 1,746
Total State-Funded FTEs by Type of Student
Basic SkillsTransfer - DomesticTransfer - InternationalWorkforce
Sta
te F
unded F
TEs
Source: SCC Enrollment Data
Context: Student Voice
“Importance to me”
1 – not important at all
7 – very important
“Enrollment factors”1. Importance of cost in decision to
enroll (M = 6.06)
2. Importance of financial aid in decision to enroll (M = 6.00)
3. Importance of academic reputation in decision to enroll (M = 5.90)
What do we know?
Declines in domestic enrollment are …
a shared problem.not related to representation based on
race/ethnicity. reflect age-related demographic changes. reflect district changes. reflect economic changes, and & financial
aid are key enrollment factors.can be seen in transfer, workforce, and
basic education.
What do we not know?
CausalityOther external factorsOther schools’ strategiesEmergent, Urgent, or Crisis
What are we doing?
Retention initiativesInvestment in student advisingEnhanced welcome week activitiesFirst Year Fast ForwardIncreasing “bucket” offeringsMid-Quarter Check-in
Marketing of workforce funding programs
Where are we headed?
Strategic Enrollment Management Begins with data Supports strategic planning KEY issues and actions Refreshed for new context