Global Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Monitoring Data: Update and ...
Does the Baby Friendly Initiative work in the UK?
description
Transcript of Does the Baby Friendly Initiative work in the UK?
Does theBaby Friendly Initiative work
in the UK?
Emilia Del Bono
November 24th 2011
UNICEF Baby Friendly InitiativeAnnual Conference - Liverpool
In 2009 the ESRC funded a new project entitled
THE EFFECTS OF BREASTFEEDING ON CHILDREN, MOTHERS AND EMPLOYERS
The 3 aims of the projects were:
To analyse the effects of breastfeeding on a wide range of outcomes, going beyond health outcomes to consider aspects of child cognitive and behavioural development
To explore outcomes pertaining to the child, but also to mothers and other relevant actors, such as employers
To use the most up-to-date statistical methods and data available in order to provide evidence of causal effects wherever possible
New research on breastfeeding
The project is run by a team of researchers based at the Institute for Social and Economic Research [ISER] (Essex University) and at the Centre for Time Use Research (Oxford University)
The team is due to report by the end of February 2012, but some of the results of the research are already available in the form of working papers
Through the work of this team and other researchers, ISER has recently produced a variety of findings in relation to the effects of breastfeeding, combining evidence from epidemiology, economics and psychology
Who is involved? Dr. Maria Iacovou, Prof. Yvonne Kelly, Dr. Birgitta Rabe, Prof. Amanda Sacker, Dr. Almudena Sevilla-Sanz
In October 2011, ISER organized an workshop at the British Academy in London where some of this research was highlighted
New research on breastfeeding
New evidence on the effectiveness of the UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative in the UK
Using data from: Millennium Cohort Study National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit 2000-2002 UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative
Discuss the initiatives which have been informed by this research
This talk
Cross-country differences in breastfeeding
Norway
Lithuan
ia
Denmark
Bulga
ria
German
yAu
stria
Switze
rland
Portug
alIta
ly
Luxem
burg
Greece
Netherl
ands
Belgi
um
Spain
United
King
dom
99 98 98 97 96 96 92 90 89 88 8680
72 71 69
Initiation
Source: Cattaneo et al. 2005, data for 1998-2001
Cross-country differences in breastfeeding
Norway
Swede
n
Denmark
Icelan
dFin
land
Switze
rland
Portug
al
Eston
ia
German
y
Luxem
burg
Spain
Netherl
ands
Lithuan
ia
Belgi
um
United
Kingdom Fra
nce
9083
75 75 74 73
63 61 60 58 58
47 4637
28
15
3 months
Source: Cattaneo et al. 2005, data for 1998-2001
Breastfeeding in the UK: trends
England & Wales Scotland Northern Ireland United Kingdom
64
50
36
6268
55
45
6671
6354
6977
7063
76
Initiation1990 1995 2000 2005
Source: UK Infant Feeding Survey, various years
Breastfeeding in the UK: mother’s education
England & Wales Scotland Northern Ireland United Kingdom
65
5043
63
7766
50
75
9287
77
91
InitiationMother left school at:
16 or under 17 or 18 over 18
Source: UK Infant Feeding Survey, various years
Breastfeeding support
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10£0
£1,000
£2,000
£3,000
£4,000
£5,000
£6,000
£7,000
Government spending on breastfeeding policies (in thousands)
Breastfeeding promotion Breastfeeding support Infant Feeding Initiative UNICEF BFI
Breastfeeding support
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10£0
£1,000
£2,000
£3,000
£4,000
£5,000
£6,000
£7,000
Government spending on breastfeeding policies (in thousands)
Breastfeeding promotion Breastfeeding support Infant Feeding Initiative UNICEF BFI
NEXT YEARS?
2011 Breastfeeding Awareness week was cancelled due to lack of funding
Cuts to local services
Scaling down of Sure Start
The Baby Friendly Hospital: Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding1. Have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely communicated to all healthcare
staff2. Train all healthcare staff in the skills necessary to implement the breastfeeding policy3. Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding4. Help mothers initiate breastfeeding soon after birth5. Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain lactation even if they are
separated from their babies6. Give newborn infants no food or drink other than breast milk, unless medically
indicated7. Practice rooming-in, allowing mothers and infants to remain together 24 hours a day8. Encourage breastfeeding on demand9. Give no artificial teats or dummies to breastfeeding infants10. Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to them
on discharge from the hospital or clinic
The Baby Friendly Hospital: Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding1. Have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely communicated to all healthcare
staff2. Train all healthcare staff in the skills necessary to implement the breastfeeding
policy3. Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding4. Help mothers initiate breastfeeding soon after birth5. Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain lactation even if they are
separated from their babies6. Give newborn infants no food or drink other than breast milk, unless medically
indicated7. Practice rooming-in, allowing mothers and infants to remain together 24 hours a day8. Encourage breastfeeding on demand9. Give no artificial teats or dummies to breastfeeding infants10. Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to them
on discharge from the hospital or clinic
Step 1Certificate of Commitment
Step 2Full
Accreditation
Kramer et al (2001)› Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) in the Republic of Belarus› Long and very long term effects
Cattaneo and Buzzetti (2001) › Implement a training programme based on BFI in Italy› Short and long term effects
Dulon et al. (2003) › Evaluation of breastfeeding promotion in Germany› Long term effects
Broadfoot et al. (2005) › Evaluation of UNICEF BFI initiative in Scotland› Short term effects
Merten et al. (2005) › Evaluation of UNICEF BFI initiative in Switzerland› Long term effects
Bartington et al. (2006) › Evaluation of UNICEF BFI initiative in the UK› Short term effects (initiation), but no long term effects
Previous literature
Sample of children› England and Wales: 1 September 2000 – 31 August 2001› Scotland and Northern Ireland: 24 November 2000 – 11 January
2002
Stratified sampling based on Child Benefit records › Wards with high proportions of ethnic minorities and high
proportions of disadvantaged households were over sampled› Weights need to be used to adjust for the sampling design
Interviews› 1st interview at 9 months, further interviews at 3, 5 and 7 years
Interviewed › Main respondent (mother) and her partner, interviewer
administered tests, nurse measurements (height and weight), child self-completion (age 7)
Millennium Cohort Study
Dimensions of breastfeeding measurement: Initiation: ever tried to breastfeed? Duration: how long? Exclusivity: were other liquids or solids fed alongside breast milk?
Measurement of breastfeeding
Duration and exclusivity0
.2.4
.6.8
1
0 2 4 6 8 10month
breastfeeding formula milkcow's milk other milksolid food
1) National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report, commissioned by Department of Health to determine the current caesarean section rate, factors associated with variation in the rate and quality of careData on all births plus detailed information about every caesarean delivery. Supplementary surveys covering midwifery, obstetric and anaesthetic issues.Geographic coverage: England, Wales, Northern IrelandTime frame: May –July 2000 in England and Wales, Dec 2000 - Feb 2001 in Northern Ireland matches MCS exactly!Matching to MCS: to hospitals 87%; to individuals 98.5% (unmatched hospitals are mostly small hospitals)
2) UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative. Data on accreditation and certification status of maternity hospitals at time of MCS births extracted from original records and double-checked with Bartington et al. (2006). Merged to MCS using birth hospital
Other data
Millennium Cohort Study + UNICEF BFI + National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit
Matched data
England Wales Northern Ireland0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
MCS births by BFI status
No BFI CC FA
30
3
67
50
44
5
26
13
61
Effectiveness of BFI
Se-ries3
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%In
crea
se in
sco
res
asso
ciat
ed
wit
h b/
f 4
wee
ks
Bf initiation Exclusive bf at 4 wks
FA FA
CC CC
Effectiveness of BFI
Se-ries3
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%In
crea
se in
sco
res
asso
ciat
ed
wit
h b/
f 4
wee
ks
Se-ries3
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%In
crea
se in
sco
res
asso
ciat
ed
wit
h b/
f 4
wee
ks
CC CC
FA FA
Bf initiation
Exclusive bf at 4 wks
Effectiveness of BFI by subgroup
below GCSEs GCSEs and above
6.30%3.80%
22.30%
12.00%
Mother's educationCC FA
Lone mothers Partnered
5.80%3.90%
23.30%
13.70%
Lone mother statusCC FA
Contrary to previous findings, we find that the BFI increased breastfeeding rates not only at initiation, but also at 1 month
Mothers giving birth in hospitals where BFI policies are fully implemented are 14.6 percent more likely to initiate breastfeeding and 6.6 percent more likely to continue to breastfeed exclusively at four weeks of age, in comparison to similar mothers in other hospitals
Policy most effective on less educated mothers and less advantaged groups
No significant change in breastfeeding behaviour at longer durations however
Summary
We need to think more about how to increase breastfeeding durations, and not just breastfeeding rates
Most research shows positive effects of breastfeeding only for longer durations (>4 months)
Baby Friendly in the Community is a new important initiative Proper evaluation of the effectiveness of this policy is VERY
IMPORTANT We need to:
Collect data on the way BF in the Community is implemented, when and where
Collect data on other community-level initiatives which may be operating in the same areas and at the same time
Match the data to individual data on breastfeeding using new 2012 Cohort Study (90,000 women)
Where do we go from here?