Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ? Numerical Approaches to AdS/CFT,...
-
Upload
sophia-berry -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ? Numerical Approaches to AdS/CFT,...
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamicallyfrom the IKKT matrix model ?
Numerical Approaches to AdS/CFT, Large N and Gravity,Sep 28-Oct 2, 2009,Imperial College, London
Jun Nishimura (KEK Theory Center)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
2
based on collaborations with
Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos (National Technical University, Athens)
Tatsumi Aoyama (KEK)
Takehiro Azuma ( Setsunan U. )
Masanori Hanada (Weizmann Inst.)
Toshiyuki Okubo (Meijo U.)
Fumihiko Sugino (Okayama Inst.)
0. Introduction
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
4
QCD string theory
strong interactions what theory describes all the interactions including gravity
free quarks perturbation theory 10d space-time
confinement non-perturbative vacuum invisible extra dim. lattice theory non-perturbative formulation matrix models (Wilson ’74) (BFSS,IKKT ’96) properties of hadrons goal black holes, early universe, derivation of SM
Comparing string theory to QCD
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
5
QCD string theory
strong interactions what theory describes all the interactions including gravity
free quarks perturbation theory 10d space-time
confinement non-perturbative vacuum invisible extra dim. lattice theory non-perturbative formulation matrix models (Wilson ’74) (BFSS,IKKT ’96) properties of hadrons goal black holes, early universe, derivation of SM
Comparing string theory to QCD
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
6
IKKT matrix model
(Ishibashi-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tsuchiya ’96)
a non-perturbative formulation of type IIB superstring theory in 10 dim. (conjecture)
• Similarity to the Green-Schwarz worldsheet action in the Schild gauge c.f.) Matrix Theory membrane action in the light cone gauge • Interactions between D-branes• Attempt to derive string field theory from SD eqs. for Wilson loops
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
7
Dynamical generation of 4d space-time
Eigenvalues :
in the limit
The order parameter forthe spontaneous breaking of the SO(10) symmetry
e.g.) SO(10) → SO(4)
c.f.) spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry from tachyonic instability in bosonic SFT Kostelecky and Samuel (1988)
“moment of inertia” tensor
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
8
Plan of the talk
0. Introduction
1. Complex fermion determinant
2. Gaussian expansion method
3. Monte Carlo studies of one-loop effective theory
4. Full Monte Carlo studies (preliminary)
5. Summary
1. Complex fermion determinant
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
10
Complex fermion determinant fermion determinant
reweighting method simulate the phase quenched model
cannot be treated as the Boltzmann weight
complex in general
suppressed as
effective sampling becomes difficult
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
11
Remarkable properties of the phase J.N.-Vernizzi (’00)
Stationarityof the phaseincreasesfor lower d
This effect compensates the entropy loss for lower d !
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
12
This is a dilemma ! Phase of the fermion determinant
important for the possible SSB of SO(10)
difficult to include in Monte Carlo simulation
Gaussian expansion method Section 2 Sugino-J.N. (’00), Kawai et al. (’01),…
New Monte Carlo technique Section 3 Anagnostopoulos-J.N. (’01)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
13
Cousins of the IKKT matrix model
6d IKKT model
4d IKKT model
complex fermion determinant
10d IKKT model
We mostly focus on this modelfor technical simplicity
2. Gaussian expansion method
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
15
Gaussian expansion methode.g.) one-matrix model
Consider the Gaussian action
free parameter
free propagator
interaction vertex
one-loopcounterterm
Perform perturbative expansion using
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
16
Self-consistency equation
self-consistency eq.:
How to identify the plateau ?
Search for concentration of solutions
plateau
Results of GEM depends on the free parameter
e.g.) free energy of the one-matrix model
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
17
GEM applied to 6d IKKT model Gaussian action
Aoyama-J.N.-Okubo, in prep.
Various symmetry breaking patterns
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
18
Results of GEM for the 6d IKKT model Aoyama-J.N.-Okubo, in prep.
Krauth-Nicolai-Staudacher (’98)
magnify this region
SO(5) SO(4) SO(3) SO(5) SO(4) SO(3) SO(5) SO(4) SO(3)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
19
Results of GEM for the 6d IKKT model (cont’d)
SO(4)
SO(3) SO(4) SO(3)
SO(5)
SO(5)
concentration of solutions identified
SO(6) SO(3) SSB
suggesting :
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
20
Results of GEM for the 6d IKKT model
SO(5), extended
SO(4), extended
SO(3), extended
extent of the eigenvalue distributionin the extended/shrunk direction
finite in units of
shrunk directions
(cont’d)
0.18
3. Monte Carlo studies ofone-loop effective theory
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
22
One-loop effective theory
treat them as small fluctuationsand keep only quadratic terms
valid when
long distance behavior
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
23
Branched-polymer-like structure Aoki-Iso-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tada(’98)
due to SUSY0
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
24
One-loop IKKT model with
No SSB of SO(10) symmetry
Ambjorn-Anagnostopoulos-Bietenholz-Hotta-J.N.(’00)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
25
One-loop 6d IKKT model with
No SSB of SO(6) symmetry
Ambjorn-Anagnostopoulos-Bietenholz-Hotta-J.N.(’00)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
26
Distribution of the normalized eigenvalues in the phase-quenched model
in the full model
How to include the effects of the phase
In order to see the net effects of the phase, we use the normalized variables:
finite N effects
Results in the phase-quenched model :
represents the effectsof the phase
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
27
The behavior of the correction factor
no. of d.o.f.
favourscollapsed configs.
Anagnostopoulos-J.N. (’02)
one-loop6d IKKT model
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
28
Factorization methodAnagnostopoulos-J.N. (’02)
Distribution of the normalized eigenvalues
has a double-peak structure !
scales ! scales !
L.h.s. is 1/N suppressed !
consistent withbranched polymer
4. Full Monte Carlo studies (preliminary)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
30
Small x behavior of in full 6dIKKT modelphase space suppression :
Large-N extrapolation reveals the existence of a “hard-core potential”
Anagnostopoulos-Aoyama-Azuma-Hanada-J.N., in prog.
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
31
Determination of the peak position
(at small x)
Precise position of the peak can be obtainedby more careful large-N extrapolation of
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
32
Comparison of the peak heights
turned out to be negligible !
The information of comes in onlythrough the determination of
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
33
Effects of the phase at
As far as , the left peak dominates !
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
34
0.6
GEM result translates to
Prediction from GEM
consistent with MC !
5. Summary
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
36
Summary and future prospects IKKT matrix model non-perturbative definition of superstring the dynamical origin of space-time dim. 6d IKKT model complex fermion determinant Gaussian expansion method
MC studies with factorization method large-N extrapolation for each factor of the distribution so far, consistent with GEM prediction Extension to IKKT model, straightforward
SO(6) SO(3) SSB
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 09.10.1 Imperial College London
Does 4d space-time emerge dynamically from the IKKT matrix model ?
37
Some comments D0 brane system Hanada and Wiseman’s talk
The phase of the fermion determinant can be neglected. agreement with the gauge/gravity duality the reason needs to be understood
SSB of SO(9) seems unlikely to happen… studies based on GEM Aoyama-J.N.-Okubo-Takeuchi, in prog IKKT model appearance of 4d gravity Kawai’s talk
spontaneous breaking of SUSY ? Sugino’s talk How to think about the Euclidean time Ambjorn’s talk How to read off the Standard Model d.o.f.