DOCUMENT RESUME LI 004 446 A Technical and …DOCUMENT RESUME ED 081 440 LI 004 446 TITLE A...
151
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 081 440 LI 004 446 TITLE A Technical and User Audit of the Shared Cataloging support Sub-System of the New England Library Information Network (NELINET). Volume II, Tables and Supplementary Documentaticn. INSTITUTION New England Board of Higher Education, Wellesley, Mass. SPONS AGENCY Council on Library Rescurces, Inc., Washington, PUB DATE Jun 73 NOTE 151p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 BC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Cataloging; College Libraries; Information Networks; Library Automation; *Library Cooperation; *Library Networks; Library Surveys; Statistical Data; Tables (Data); University Libraries; Use Studies IDENTIFIERS NELINET; *New England Library Information Network; Shared Cataloging ABSTRACT The results of a project designed to perform a technical audit and a user audit of the Shared Cataloging Support Sub-System of the New England Library Information Networli fNELINET) are summarized in a two volume report. This portion, Volume II contains various tabulations of collected data; Volume I (LI 004 445) contains the narrative text. Various quantitative and qualitative data were obtained by interviews and quebtionnaires from the staffs of twenty academic libraries in New Englarcl. The purposes of compiling these data were to help the NELINET staff improve both the performances and cost allocation of the NELINET off-line Shared Cataloging Support Sub-System, and to aid the staff in planning for subsequent development of other networ%-oriented services. (Author/SJ)
Transcript of DOCUMENT RESUME LI 004 446 A Technical and …DOCUMENT RESUME ED 081 440 LI 004 446 TITLE A...
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 081 440 LI 004 446
TITLE A Technical and User Audit of the Shared Catalogingsupport Sub-System of the New England LibraryInformation Network (NELINET). Volume II, Tables andSupplementary Documentaticn.
INSTITUTION New England Board of Higher Education, Wellesley,Mass.
SPONS AGENCY Council on Library Rescurces, Inc., Washington,
PUB DATE Jun 73NOTE 151p.
EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 BC-$6.58DESCRIPTORS *Cataloging; College Libraries; Information Networks;
Library Automation; *Library Cooperation; *LibraryNetworks; Library Surveys; Statistical Data; Tables(Data); University Libraries; Use Studies
IDENTIFIERS NELINET; *New England Library Information Network;Shared Cataloging
ABSTRACTThe results of a project designed to perform a
technical audit and a user audit of the Shared Cataloging SupportSub-System of the New England Library Information Networli fNELINET)are summarized in a two volume report. This portion, Volume IIcontains various tabulations of collected data; Volume I (LI 004 445)contains the narrative text. Various quantitative and qualitativedata were obtained by interviews and quebtionnaires from the staffsof twenty academic libraries in New Englarcl. The purposes ofcompiling these data were to help the NELINET staff improve both theperformances and cost allocation of the NELINET off-line SharedCataloging Support Sub-System, and to aid the staff in planning forsubsequent development of other networ%-oriented services.(Author/SJ)
PFNMISNIUN TO REPRODUCE THIS COTO,RiGHTFO MATERIAL HAS
DE N GRANTED NY
Er-(4,,510JhC of, L IJOrt-k4-1
CCE1TO FRC ANT:.ORGANIZATio4S- OPERATING
UNDER AGREEMENTS ,5,1Et7NF NATIONAL IN
STITUTE OF EDUCATIONFURTHER REPRO
OtiCirON OUTSIDE TNF ERIC. STSTFm NFQUIRES PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHTOWNER
U S DE PARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION 8 WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATIONTM', DO( OP.1 NT N Pi PPDONCE P. F t.(TI Y NI f IVE D T komTEO Pi N.ON OK ow(....N./AION N
POINT'. O; Ow OPINION',D DO Noi NI ( I PRF
NT O;I D.),,,T1r,..1 ri,
A TECHNICAL AND USER AUDITOF THE
SHARED CATALOGING SUB-SYSTEMOF THE
NEW ENGLAND LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK(NELINET)
Volume II Tables and SupplementaryDocumentation
New England Board of Higher Education40 Grove Street
Wellesley, Massachusetts 02181
The Work Reported Herein Was Performed Undera Grant From the CGuncil on Library Resources
June 1973
COUNCIL ON LIBRARY RESOURCESWASHINGTON, D.C.
ABSTRACT
This two volume report describes a project undertaken by the NewEngland Board of Higher Education's NELINET program during 1971. Variousquantitative and qualitative data were obtained by means of interviews andquestionnaires from the staffs of twenty academic libraries in New England.The purpose of compiling these data was to help the NELINET staff improveboth the performance and cost allocation of the NELINET off-line SharedCataloging Support Sub-System designed and operated by Inforonics, Incorporatedin Maynard, Massachusetts. A further goal was to aid the staff in planningfor subsequent development of other network-oriented services. A tabulationprogram was added to the computerized catalog card production system to mon-itor and display basic performance data to the Vendor, the NELINET managementand the directors of participating libraries.
ii
FOREWORD
This two volume report summarizes the results of a project designedto perform a technical audit and a user audit of the Shared Cataloging SupportSub-System of the New England Library Information Network (NELINET) performedunder grant number CLR-511 from the council on Library Resources. Volume I
contains narrative text and Volume II contains various tabulations. Each vol-ume contains a full Table of Contents for both volumes.
The New England Board of Higner Education (NEBHE) wishes to expressits appreciation to the staff members of the several libraries wno assistedin the audits and without whose cooperation this project could not have beenundertaken. Our special thanks are offered to Mrs. Ldith M. Lesser of theCouncil on Library Resources for her patience in monitoring the performanceof the project staff.
The Project Director wishes to thank the following NELINET staffmembers who assisted in the completion of the study: Mr. Liam Kelly, Assis-tant Director for Field Operations; Miss Polly Coe, Research Assistant;Mr. R. D. Morrison, Jr., Special Consultant for Library Systems; Mrs. CarolHolland, Miss Carol Stuart, and Mrs. Dianne Higgins, long-suffering secretaries;and Miss Mary Madden and Mr. Lawrence F. Buckland of Inforonics, Incorporated,for tneir contributions to Sections 4.3 and 4.5.
Tire NEBHE and Inforonics staff members would like finally, to ex-press their gratitude in memoriam to Mr. Verner W. Clapp whose early insightand wise counsel brought NELITTrinto being and nurtured us through theseformative years.
111
Volume I: Text
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page No.
1.0 Introduction 1-1
1.1 Background of the NELINET Program 1-2
1.2 Rationale for the Study 1-6
1.3 Observations and Recommendations 1-7
2.0 Study Methodology 1-11
2.1 Scope of Project 1-11
2.2 Project Implementation 1-14
2.3 Discussion of Project Tasks 1-15
3.0 Survey of Libraries 1-28
3.1 Overview 1-28
3.2 Data Collection and Analysis 1-30
4.0 Shared Cataloging Support Sub-System 1-62
4.1 Overview 1-62
4.2 User Interaction w1.h the Sub-System 1-64
4.2.1 User input decisions 1-64
4.2.2 User input request processing 1-68
4.2.3 System response characteristics 1-71
1.2.4 User activities after cards are received 1-72
4.3 Vendor Procedures and Cost Elements 1-82
4.4 NELINET Headquarters Activities 1-111
4.5 SuL-System Management Data Package 1-113
4.6 User Presentation Package 1-128
5.0 Appendices 1-133
5.1 Project Work Statement 1-134
iv
Volume I: Text
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd.)
Section Page No.
5.2 NELINET Membership, November 1971 1-138
5.3 Shared Cataloging Support Sub-System: 1-140Request Processing Questionnaire
5.4 Shared Cataloging Support Sub-System: 1-143Output Processing Questionnaire
5.5 Processing Flow Charts 1-145
5.6 Samples of Catalog Cards, 1-153Book and Spine Labels
5.7 User Audit Questionnaire (Modular) 1-155
5.8 NELINET Membership Recruiting Information 1-230
6.0 Bibliography 1-235
Figure Number
Volume I: Text
LIST OF FIGURES
Title Page
3.0-1 Institutions Participating in NELINET 1-29
User Audit
3.2-1 NELINET Library Survey 1-31
4.2-1 Flow Chart - Typical Decision Tree 1-66for Ordering NELINET Products
4.2-2 Comparative Flow Chart - NELINET Request 1-69-70Processing Activities
4.2-3 Distribution of Matched Requests During 1-73a 10 Week Cycle for Each NELINET Library
4.2-4
4.2-5
4.3-1 (1-4)
4.3-2
4.3-3 (1-5)
4.3-4 (1-4)
Comparative Flow Chart - NELINET Receipt 1-75-78Processing Activities
Frequency Rating of Card Changes (Prior 1-79to NELINET)
Flow Chart of Production Operation 1-84-88
Showing Cost/Title
Summary of September Costs and Possible 1-89Reductions
Cost per Title for Separate Production 1-91-95Operations
Labor Cost per Title Processed I- 97-100
4.3-5 Calculation of Total Computer Expensefor Library Services
Computer Cost per Title
Computer Support Cost per Unit Title
Administrative Support Expense
Materials and Purchased Services
4.3-6
4.3-7
4.3-8 (1-5)
4.3-9 (1-2)
4.5-1
I- 101
I- 102
I- 103
1- 104-108
I- 109-110
Quantity of Requests Made to the Shared 1-115Cataloging Sub-System by User Library
4.5-2 Distribution Array of Matched Requestsas a Function of Week Requests /In System,By User Library
1-117
4.5-3 Quantity of New and Changed MARC Records 1-118Added to the NELINET Master File
vi
Figure Number
Volume I: Text
LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd.)
Title Page
4.5-4 Distribution of Catalog Entries 1-119Arrayed by User Library
4.S-5 Unit Message Card 1-120
4.5-6 Ratio of Follow-on Cards per Catalog 1-121
Entry Over a Five Week Test Period
4.5-7 Master File and Request Status Report 1-122
Arrayed by User Library
4.5-b Book Pocket and Selin Spine Label Pro- 1-124
duction per Library Over a Five WeekPeriod
4.5-9 Book Pocket and Selin Spine Label Pro-duction for all NELINET Libraries Overa Five Week Period
4.5-10 Quantities of Requests Matching MARCRecords Arrayed Over a 10 Week CycleFrom bate of Input
4.5-11 Percentage of Requests Matching MARCRecords Arrayed Over a 10 Week CycleFrom Date of Input
4.6-1 Holdings File Manipulation
4.6-2 Steps for Inputting Local Catalog CopyInto the NELINET Master File
vii
1-125
I-126
1-127
1-130
1-132
Appendices
Volume I: Text
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page No.
5.0 1-133
5.1 Project Work Statement 1-134
5.2 NELINET Membership and Status - 1-138November, 1971
5.3 Shared Cataloging Sub-System Request 1-140Processing Questionnaire
5.4 Shared Cataloging Sub-System Output 1-143Processing Questionnaire
5.5 Procesing Flow Charts 1-145
5.6 Samples of Catalog Cards, Books and 1-153Spine Labels
5.7 User Audit Questionnaire (Modular) I-I55
5.b NELINET Recruiting Information 1-230
6.0 Bibliog.-aphy 1-235
viii
Volume II
TABLES AND SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTATION
Table Number Title Page
2.3-1 Hours Spent Deciding to Send for NELINET II-1
Card Products
2.3-2 Hours Shelving NELINET Books Waiting for II-1
Cards (Estimate if Out of Your Department)
2.3-3 Hours Searching for LC Card Numbers if Notin book or on Order Form
II-1
2.3-4 Hours Filling NELINET Request Forms 11-2
2.3-5 Hours Typing NELINET Requests 11-2
2.3-6 Hours Proofing Requests 11-2
2.3-7 Hours Correcting Requests 11-3
2.3-8 Hours Mailing Requests 11-3
2.3-9 lours Filling Out Local Forms Connectedwith Requests
11-3
2.3-10 Number of Requests Sent to Inforonics 11-4
2.3-11 How Many Requests are Corrected 11-4
2.3-12 Cost of Mailing Requests 11-4
2.3-13 Date and Day of Week Requests are Sent to 11-5Inforonics
2.3-14 Hours Matching Products and Books 11-6
2.3-15 Hours Checking Cards for Accuracy 11-6
2.3-16 Hours Correcting Cards 11-6
..3 -17 Hours Checking Error Messages 11-7
2.3-18 Hours Putting on Book Pocket Labels 11-7
2.3-19 Hours Putting Selin Labels on Books 11-7
2.3-20 Hours Filing Cards 11-8
2.3-21 Hours Shelving Books in Stacks 11-8
2.3-22 Hours Filling Problem Sheets for Inforonics 11-8
2-3-23 Hours Adding to Sets (Local Notes Etc.) 11-9
ix
Table Number
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Title Page
2.3-24 Total Sets Received 11-9
2.3-25 Date and Day of Week of Receipt 11-9
2.3-26 Number of Sets Corrected 11-10
2.3-27 Number of Returns to LC II-10
2.3-28 Postage to Return Cards to LC II-10
2.3-29 Number of Returns to Inforonics II-11
2.3-30 Postage to Return Cards to Inforonics II-11
2.3-31 Telepnone Bill to Inforonics/NLLINLT II-11
2.3-32 Number of Xerox Pages for Returrs 11-12
2.3-33 NLLINET Connected Administrative/ 11-12
Organizational Time
2.3-34 Number of Follow-on Cards Discarded 11-12
(If Applicable)
Ib-1 Total Holdings 11-13
18-2 Budget: Materials 11-14
113-3 Budget: Salaries (Professional, Clerical,Other Salaries
11-15
IB-4 Total Budget 11-16
IC-1 Total Staff According to Position and 11-17Salary
ID-1 Student Characteristics (Undergraduate,Graduate, Other)
11-18
IL-1 Faculty Characteristics (Including Teaching,Research and Administrative)
11-19
IF-1 Degrees Offered (Plus Number of Areas in 11-20Which Degrees Offered)
IG-1 Computing Services to Library 11-21
IH-1 NELINET and Local Priorities, Acquisitions 11-22
IH-2 NELINLT and Local Priorities, Cataloging 11-23
IH-3 NELINET and Local Priorities, Serials Control 11-24
IH-4 NELINET and Local Priorities, Circulationand Interlibrary Loan
11-25
x
Table Number
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Title Page
III -5 NELINET and Local Priorities, Referenceand Public Services (Part I)
(Part II)IU -6 ALINET and Local Priorities, Management
Information
II-1 Current NELINET Services
IIA-1 Acquisitions: Staff and Salary
IIB-1 Number of Blanket Order/Approval Plans -Percent of Current Acquisitions
IIC-1 Use of Proof-Slips/Depository Cards
IIL-1 Computer Used for Acquisitions Support?
IIF-1 Current Fiscal Year: What Percent of ItemsAre: Current Imprints (Post '68) Percentand Retrospective (Pre '68) Percent?
IIG Percent of Acquisitions Initiated by: Faculty, 11-35Library Staff, Gifts, Other?
III' -1 Acquisitions Budget for 1968-1971 Annually 11-36
III-1 Could Acquisitions System be Improved? 11-37
I1J-1 Are Checks Written to Vendors. or Publishers 11-38by: Library, Business Offi(.e, Other?
11-26
11-27
11-28
11-29
11-30
11-31
IIK-1 Coordination Between Acquisitions and Cataloging1I-39
11L-1 Coordination Between Acquisitions and Faculty 11-40
II11 -1 Is There a Well-Defined Selection Policy? 11-41
1IN-1 Acquisition - Centralized Selection 11-42
II0-1 Acquisition - Cooperative Programs 11-43
IIP-1 Acquisition - Cooperative Programs (Expensive 11-44Items)
IIQ-1 Files Used in Aquisitions 11-45
IIIA-1 Size of Staff 11-46
II1B-1 Catalog Budget - Annual 11-47
IIIC-1 Classification Systems Used 11-48
IIIU-1 Backlog and Breakdown 11-49
xi
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Table Number Title Page
IIIE-1 Priority Categories for Processing 11-50
IIIF-1 Average Cataloging Processing Time 11-51
IIIG-1 rifles Processed Without LC, NUC or 11-52Secondary Source Copy
IIIH-1 Language Processed (Percent of Total 11-53Items Processed)
IVC-1
IVE-1
VA-1
VC-1
VD-1
VF-1
VG-1
Catalog Copy
Serials Cataloging
Fling: How Many Hours Spent Per Week?
Reassignment of Catalo-gers
Catalog System Improvements
Catalog Filing
Departmental Files
Would You be io Favor of Your LibraryParticipating in NELINET?
What Do You Think of NELINET Catalog SupportProducts?
Specific Comments on Service Acceptability
Distribution of Current Acquisitions byLanguage and Date
System Development Options Preference
What is the Average Number of Requests Sentto NELINET per Month?
What Criteria Determines What Items areSelected for Requesting Cards?
At What Point of Processing do you RequestNELINET Products?
On the Average How Long do You Have to WaitFrom the Time You Request to the Time YouReceive Them?
11-54
11-55
11-56
11-57
11-58
11-59
11-60
11-61
11-62
11-63
11-64
11-65
11-66
11-67
11-68
11,69
What Do You Like Most About the Catalog 11-70Support Services?
What Do You Dislike Most About the Catalog 11-71
Support Services?
xii
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Table Number Title Page
VH-1 Could You Send More Requests to NELINET? 11-72
VI-1 What Improvements Would You Like to See in 11-73
the NELINET System?
VJ-1 Has NELINET Had Any Effect on Staff Job Load? 11-74
VVK-1 Are All of Your Problems Given Prompt 11-75
Attention by Inforonics or NELINET Staff?
VL-1 Are There Formal Staff Meetings About 11-76
NELINET?
VM-1 How Many Staff Members are Involved With 11-77
NELINET?
VN-1 Are NELINET Products of Satisfactory Quality? 11-78
VO-1 Do You Use All NELINET Products? 11-79
VP-1 Do You Return Products to NELINET? 11-80
VQ-1 Do You Change the NELINET Machine File When 11-81
You Manaully Change a NELINET Shelf List Card?
VR-1
VS-1
VT-1
VU-1
VV-1
VW-1
VX-1
VY-1
VIA-1
VIB-1
VIC-1
VID-1
Can You Think of Any Other Cataloging Support 11-82
Products, Etc.?Do You Keep Track of NELINET Expenditures? 11-83
Do You Understand How the NELINET System Works 11-84Technically?
Non-English LC Card Number, Searching
Do You Think 10 Weeks Period of LeavingRequests on the File is: Too Long? TooShort? How Many Weeks Should They Remainon the File?
11-85
11-86
How Many Requests Do You Usually Have at 11-87NELINET at Any One Time (New and 010?
What Statistics do You Maintain About NELINET's 11-88Performance for Your Library?
System Development Options Preference 11-89
Does Your Library Distinguish Between Serials 11-90and Periodicals?
Acquisitions Statistics 11-91
Are Serials Handled by a Special Department 11-92or Division?
Serials Department Staff 11-93
xiii
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Table Number Title Page
V1E-1 Serials Department Budget 11-94
VIF-1 Use of Jobbers 11-95
VI1-1 What Are Your Major Problem Areas in 11-96Serials Aquisitions, Processing and Control?
VIJ-1
VIK-1
VIIA-1
VIIC-1
VIID-1
VIIE-1
VIIE-2
VIIE-3
VIIE-4
VIIG-1
VIIH-1
Computer Aids - Serials Control
Please Describe Serials FileCirculation and Interlibrary Loan Staff
11-97
11-9811-99
What Groups of Materials Do Not Circulate? II-100
Open or Closed Stacks? II-101
Contents of Circulation Control Files 11-102
Do You Keep a Statistical Breakdown of Your 11-103Circulation Figures? 1968-1969
Do You Keep a Statistical Breakdown oi Your 11-104Circulation Figures? 1969-1970
Do You Keep a Statistical Breakdown of Your 11-105Circulation Figures? 1970-1971
Do You Keep a Statistical Breakdown of Your 11-106Circulation Figures? 1971-1972
What is the Average Time Required for Binding? 11-107
What is the Average Time for Receipt of an ILL 11-108Revests to Getting Material in the Mail?
What is the Average Number of Pages ofPhotocopies Sent in Response to an ILLRequest?
Do You Charge Other Libraries for ILL?
VIIH-2 How Many Items Have You Lent on ILL for: Photo,II-109Original?
VIIH-3 What are the Main Institutions to Which YouLend Items on ILL and What Percentage of YourLoans Do They Cover?
II-110
What is the Average Time You Must Wait to Get II-111ILL Items From Other Libraries, Beginning atthe Point of User Request and Ending WithNotification of Receipt of Item to User - Days?
xiv
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
PageTable Number Title
VIII-2 How Many Items Borrowed on I.L.L. From Other 11-112
Libraries?
VIII-3 Which are the Main Institutions From 11-113
Which You Borrow on I.L.L. and What Per-centage of Your I.L.L. Borrowing do TheyCover?
VIII-4 Do You Charge Users for I.L.L.s Done for Them? 11-114
VIIJ-1 Describe How I.L.L. Fits Into Your Library 11-115Organization.
VIIL-1 Circulation and Interlibrary Loan Control 11-116
VIIN-1 Circulation and Interlibrary Loan Control 11-117
VIIO -1 Circulation and Interlibrary Loan Control 11-118
VIIP-1 Circulation and Interlibrary Loan Control 11-119
VIIQ-1 Total Annual Circulation Budget 11-120
VIIR-1 Major Project Areas 11-121
VIIS-1 What is Your Fine Structure? 11-122
VIIU-1 How Much Staff Time is Consumed per Month 11-123by: Overdues? Filing? Shelving?
VIIV-1 Billing for Fines 11-124
VIIW-1 Circulation Department Files 11-125
VIIIA-1 Reference: Staff 11-126
VIIIB-1 Number of Titles in Reference Collection? 11-127
Number of Volumes in Reference Collection?
Annual Turnover of Reference Collection byNumber of Titles?
VIIIC-1 Total Reference Transaction for: 1968-1969, 11-1281969-1970, 1970-1971
VIIID-1 Allocation of Professional Time 11-129
VIIIE-1 Use of Collection 11-130
VIIIF-1 What Has the Reference Budget Been for Each 11-131
of the Last Three Years?
xv
Table Number
VIIIG-1
VIIIH-1
VIIII.1
Volume II: Tables and Supplementary Documentation
Title Page
How Many Professional Staff Have You 11-132
Added (Not Replaced)
Most Pressing Needs of Your Department? 11-133
Name and Brief Description of Files? 11-134
(Generated by the Division)?
xvi
Tables 2.3-1 thrd 2,3-3
Table 2.3-1
HRS. SPENT DECIDING TO SEND FOR NELINET CARD PRODUCTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/titlei
Lib. 15 2.00 1.75 2.00 1.75 2.00 9.50 1.90 .019Lib. 16 .25 .25 .25 .25 .75 1.75 .35 .0071
Lib. 17 .50 2.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 8.00 1.60 .0213Lib. 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 19 SUMMED FOR 5 WEEKS 33.00 6.60 .0289
Total 52.25 2.61 .019
.......--
Table 2.3-2
HRS. SHELVING NELINET BOOKS WAITING FOR CARDS (EST. IF OUT OF YOUR DEPARTMENT)
IWK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Tot:7av/W: av/title
Lib. 15 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. lu .25 .25 .2 .d .25 1.25 .25 .005Lib. 1/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 2.00 4.0C 1.0 .0C .00* 7.00 1.40 --
Lib. 19 .50 .5 .5C .75 3.25 .65 .003
Total 21.50 4.30 .004
* invalid data
Table 2.3-3
HRS. SEARCHING FOR LC CARD NOS. IF NOT IN BOOK OR ON ORDER FORM
WK - 1 WK 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/title
Lib. 15 -- -- -- -- --Lib. 16 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 17 -- --.
--
Lib. 18 2.00 2.00 1.50 .3.00 2.00 10.50 2.1 .0124Lib. 19 -- -- -- -- - --
Total 10.50 2.1 .0124
Table 2.3-4
RS. FILLING NELINET REQUEST FORMS
Tables 2.3-4 thru 2.3-6
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK -.3 WK - 4 WK - 5Total av/wk av/title
Lib. 15 .75 .75 .75 .75 1.00 4.00 .80 .0080Lib. 16 .75 .50 .50 .25 1.25 3.25 .65 .0133Lib. 17 .50 2.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 8.00 1.60 .0213Lib. 18 .75 .25 .25 . .00 2.00 3.25 .65 .0038Lib. 19 4.00 2.75 2.50 3.00 3.00 15.25 3.05 .0133
Total 33.75 1.35 .0119
Table 2.3-5
HRS. TYPIA NLL:AT REQULSTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk avgitle
Lib. 15 1.00 .75 .875 .875 .875 4.37 .87. .0087L.b. 16 .50 .25 .50 .25 1.00 2.50 .50 .0102Lib. 17 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.00 1.50 9.25 1.85 .0246 .
Lib. 18 3.75 .75 1.25 ..00 1.00 6.75 1.35 .0079Lib. 1 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.25 10.75 2.15 .009
Total 33.62 6.72 .012
Table 2.3-6
HRS. PROOFMG REQULSTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 1WK - 4 WK - S Total av/wk av/title
Lib. 15 -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .005Lib. 17 -- , --
Lib.18 -- -- __ , -- * --
Lib.19 4.00 2.75 .75 .50 .75 8.75 .75 .0076
Total 10.00 .50 .006
* Included in Table 2.3.5
Table 2.3-7
HRS. CORRECTING REQUESTS
Tables 2.3-7 t.hru 2.3-9
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total
--,
av/wk av/title
lib. 15 -- -- --
Lib. 16 -- -- --
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. lb -- -- --, . --
Lib. 19 -- -- 3 -- -- 3 3 .016
Total 3 3 .016
* Included in Table 2.3-5
Table 2.3-3
(IRS. MAILING REQUESTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total, av/wk av/title-----
Lib. 15 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .0025
Lib. 16 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .005
Lib. 17 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .003
Lib. 18 .25 .L5 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .001
Lib. 19 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .001
Total 6.25 .25 .0025
Table 2.3-9
HRS. FILLING OUT LOCAL FORMS CONNECTED WITH REQUESTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - S Total av/wk av/title
Lib. 15 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .0025
Lib. 16 -- -- -- --
Lib. 17 .25 .25 .25 .50 .50 1.75 .35 .0071
Lib. 18 -- -- -- . -- . --
Lib. 19 -- -- -- -- --
Total 3.00 .30.
.0048
Tables 2.3-10 thru 2.3-12
Table 2.3-10
NUMLER OF REQUESTS SENT TO INFORONICS---
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/title
Lib. 15 100 100 100 100 100 500 100Li'). 16 44 27 38 20 115 244 49
Lib. 17 75 75 75 75 75 375 75
Lib. 18 424 100 200 0 120 844 169
Lib. 19 176 205 187 272 300 1140 228
Total 81.9 507 600 467 710 3103 621
Lib. U sent no reouests during week No. 4
Table 2.3-11
HOW HAW REQUESTS ARE CORRECTED
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - Total av /,ik
Lib. 15Lib. 16Lib. 17Lib. 18
Lib. 19
Total
LiD. A
3 3
L
See table 2.3 -7 these
2
2
L
1
3
3
request corrections
12
5
22
apparently
av/title
2.4 .024
1 .013
1 .004
1.1 .014
consumed aa time
Table 2.3-12
COST OF MAILING REQUESTS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5
,--------
Total av /wk, av/title
Lib. 15 $ .50 $ .50 $ .50 $.50 $ .50 $2.50 S .50 $.005Lib. 16 __ _ -- -- -- __ --Lib. 17 -- -- , -- -- -- -- --Lib. 18 1.25 1.00 1.00 . .00 1.00 4.25 .85 .005Lib. 19 .48 .32 .32 .40 .40 1.92 .38 .0016
Total 8.67 1.73 .004
Table 2.3-13
Table 2.3-13
DATE AND DAY OF WEEK REQUESTS ARE SENT TO INFORONICS (Julian date 146 = 5/26/71)
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5
Lib. 15 W146 W153 W160 W167 W174
Lib. 16 W181 F190 TH196 F204 TH210
Lib. 17 TU180 W138 TU194 TU201 TU208Lib. 18 F183 F190 F197 F211
Lib. 19 TH182 T11189 TH196 TH203 TH210
Table 2.3-14
HRS. HATCHING PRODUCTS AND BOOKS
Tables 2.3-14 thru 2.3-16
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 W Total avfwk av/set
Lib. 15 --
Lib. 16 1.75 .75 1.75 1.25 .75 6.25 1.25 .045
Lib. 17 .75 .5 .25 .25 .25 ?.0 .4 .007
Lib. 18 29.5 4 4.75 .5.25 17 60.5 12.1 .031
Lib. 19 4 -- 5 4 3 16 3.2 .021
Total 84.75 16.95 .026
Table 2.3-15
HS. CHECKDG CARDS FOR ACCURACY
WK - 1 i WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/rk av/set
Lib. 15 3.75 3.25 3.5 3.5 3.75 17.75 3.55 .037
Lib. 16 1.25 .25 .75 .5 .5 3.25 0.65 .023
Lib. 17 -- -- -- --
Lib. 18 8.75 6.5 11.5 12.75 6.75 46.25 9.25 .023
Lib. 19 2.25 2 4 5 3.75 17 3.4 .022
Total 84.25 16.85 .02b
Table 2.3 16 .
HRS. :ORRECTING CARDS
-----WK-11 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 1.25 .25 .003
Lib. 16 .25 .25 .25 -- -- .75 .15 .005
Lib. 17 -- -- -- . -- -- --
Lib. 18 1.75 .25 .75 . .5 .25 3.5 .7 .002
Lib. 19 .25 2.5 4 2.25 1.75 8.5 l'.7 .011
Total 14 2.8 .005
11-6
Table 2.3-17
HRS. CHECKING ERROR MESSAGES
tables 2.3-17 thru 2.3-19
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. is -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 .5 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 18 .25 .25 0 0 .25 .75 .15 .0004
Lib. 19 -- -- 1 .5 .5 2.0 .4 .0026
Total 2.75 .55 .002
Table 2.3-18
HRS. PUTTING ON LOOK POCKET LABELS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. is -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 1 -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 17 .5 .5 .25 .2 .25 1.75 .35 .006
Lib. is 2.5 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.5 6.25 1.65 .004
Lib. 19 .25 -- 2 1.5 1.5 5.26 1.05 .007
Total 15.25 3.05 .006
Table 2.3-19
HRS. PUTTING SELIN LABELS ON BOOKS.
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total
-
av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 .75 .25 .5 .25 .25 2 .4 .015
Lib. 17 -- .75 .75 .75 2.25 .45 .007
Lib. 18 3 1.5 2.5 2 2 11 2.2 .006
Lib. 19 .75 .75 .75 1.5 4.5 3.25 1.65 .011
Total 23.5 '4.7 .010
---___1
Table 2.3-20
HRS. FILING CARDS
Tables 2.3-20 thru 2.3-22
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK 4 WK - 5 total av/wk av/set
Lib. Is -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -_
Lib.16 2.25 .5 1.25 .75 .75 5.5 1.1 .040
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 13 7, 13.75 10.25 .7.25 8.75 47 9.4 .024
Lib. 19 Summary 5 weeks 42 6.4 .055
Total 94.5 18.9 .040
Table 2.3-21
HRS. SHLLVIHG LOOKS IN STACKS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk1
av/set
Lib.15 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 .010
bib.16 -- -- --
Lib.17 ,-,
, 2 2 , 2 2 10 2 .034
Lib.1S 2.5 1 1.75 1.25 1.25 7.75 1.55 .004
Lib.19 -- -- -- -- --
Total 22.75 4.55 .016
Table 2.3-22
HRS. FILLDfl PROULn SHLETS FOR INFORONICS
WK 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib.15 .25 - - .25 -- .25 .75 .15 .002
Lib.1G -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib.17 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib.18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib.19 .5 -- -- -- -- .5 .1 .001
Total 1.25 .25 .0015
Tables 2.3-23 thru 2.3-25
Table 2.3-23
HRS. ADDING TO SETS (LOCAL NOTES ETC.)
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib.15 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 3.75 .75 .008
Lib. 16 -- -- -- -- -- -- __
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 18 -- -- -- .
-- -- --
Lib. 19 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- __
Total 3.75 .75 .008
Taule 2.3-24
TOTAL SETS RECEIVED
WK - 1 WK - 2....-----_.WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib.15 97 94 101 95 97 484 96.8
Lib.16 59 12 30 16 19 136 27.6
Lib.17 69 55 54 52 62 292 56.4
Lib.18 731 117 325 85 728 1986 397.2
Lib.19 151 127 161 T55 167 761 152.2
Total 1107 405 671 405 1073 3661 732.2
Table 2.3-25
DATE AHD DAY OF UM: OF RECEIPT Julian date 141 5/21/7
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total avhik
'.......--.;
av/set
Lib. 15 F141 8146 1U152 W100 T168
Lib. 16 1182 1193 M200 1203 M207
Lib. 17 Jlbl TU194 8195 W202 1207
Lib. 18 T8130 W188 8195 7203 TU208Lib. 19 -- -- 1193 8202 F204
Table 2.3-26
NO. OF SETS CORRECTED
tables 2.3-26 thru 2.3-28
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 1!: 3 1 1 1 2 8 1.6 .017Lib. 1( 3 2 4 0 1 10 2 .072Lib. 17 -- --
Lib, 18 15 G 12 /3 9 55 11 .028Lib. 19 3 13 15 11 4 46 9.2 .061
Total.
119 23.8 .045
Table 2.3-27
,10. OF RETURNS TO LC
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - S Total av/wk av/sel:'
Lib. 15 0,. 1 0 1 1 6
Lib. 16 C 0 0 0 0 0
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 18 0 1 0 2 4 7
Lib. 19 -- -- -- --
Total 13
Table 2.3-28 .
POSTAGE TO RETURN CARDS TO LC
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 .08 -- -- .08 --Lib. 16 -- -- -- -- -- NOT APPLICABLELib. 17 -- -- -- -- TO SET COSTSLib. 18 -- -- -- -- --Lib. 19 -- -- -- --
Total
Table 2.3-29
NO. OF RETURNS TO INFORONICS
Tables 2.3-29 thru 2.3-31
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK 4 WK 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 1 -- -- -- 1 2 .4 .0005Lib. 16 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 18 -- -- __ -- -- __ _. --Lib. 19 -- 19 -- -- -- 19 3.8 .005
Total 21 4.2 .0055
Table 2.3-30
POSTAGE TO RETURN CARDS TO INFORONICS
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 .08 -- -- -- .08 .16 .032 .0003Li'). 16 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Lib. 19 -- .16 -- -- .16 .032 .0002
Total .32 .064 .0003
Table 2.3-31 .
TELEPHONE BILL TO INFORONICS/NELINET
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK 3 WK - 4 T WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 -- -- -- -- i
Lib. 16 -- -- -- --Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- NO DATALib. 18 -- -- -- -- -- RECORDEDLib. 19 -- -- --
Total
Table 2.3-32
NO. OF XEROX PAGES FOR RETURNS
Tables 2.3-32 thru 2.3-34
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- NO DATALib. 18 -- -- -- -- RECORDEDLib. 19 -- 4 3 -- --
Total
Table 2.3-33 .
NELINET CONNECTED ADMINISTRATIVE/ORGANIZATIONAL TIME
IWK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK - 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 -- __ -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 16 1 1 .5 1 1 4.5 .9 .033Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lib. IP 1.5 1 1.5 -- 1.5 5.5 1.1 .007
Total 10.0 2.0 .02
Table 2.3-34 .
NO. OF FOLLOW-ON CARDS DISCARDED (IF APPLICALLL)r
WK - 1 WK - 2 WK - 3 WK - 4 WK _ 5 Total av/wk av/set
Lib. 15 74 114 84 63 77
Lib. 16 70 4 57 11 11
Lib. 17 -- -- -- -- -- NOT APPLICAbLELib. 18 224 93 92 195 116 TO SET COSTSLib.19 78 189 375 268 253
Total
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17'
18 19 20
TOTAL HOLDINGS
1968-1969
1969-1970
1970-1971
-
1971-1972 (est.)
Volumes
Titles
Volumes
Titles
Volumes
Titles
Volumes
Titles
401,594
256,034
438,210
277,825
499,357
296,616
561,037
328,980
245,303
147,181
253,041
154,825
267,279
159,695
277,190
166,314
609,932
632,189
657,217
675,000
300,247
307,595
20,000
16,000
1,133,551
1,221,202
1,314,070
4,409,000
985,011
1,003,048
1,030,749
1,OG5,O00
79,723
91,205
102,845
239,925
119,962
267,650
133,825
293,585
149,292
324,725
162,392
240,600
92,000
250,0A
98,000
252,000
109,500
263,000
123,500
1,255,053
1,303,559
1,351,976
,400,600
110,012
122,110
135,475
148,00
20,017
17,276
27,284
23,801
33,557
28,840
40,000
35,000
276,011
215,000
281,395
220,000
294,142
230,000
302,000
240,000
873,541
977,G94
419,250
1,100,000
1,200,000
437,510
450,000
402,249
501,704
541,172
530,000
608,740
341,000
215,000
318,000
240,000
403,000
272,000
456,726
,493,683
529,700
565,030
74,000
82,000
92,000
100,000
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 li 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
MIDGET:
MATERIALS
1968-69
1969-7(1
Ser.
Other
Mono.
1970-71
Ser.
Other
:'one.
1971-72
Ser.
Other
'.ono.
Ser.
Other
Mono.
...--,
420,000
7G 000
115 000
50
i111
i1
:n
1so
t.
1l
11
55,814
32,292
55,914
32,272
68,372
35,230
74.000
38,000
114,213
68,455
139,810
85,2)9
132,775
99,359
134,739
90,000
56
400 (Tot)
66,400 (Tot)
76,400
91,000
(Tot)
13,000
97,000
81,400
(Tot)
270,200
201,200
292,700
250,500
336,800
302,200
326,700
3C9,700
226,748
......--
137,527
246,449
33 750
200,162
241,001
39,840
250,728
283,142
39,518
260,000
285,000
40,000
6,219
23,342
70,366
9,086
13,043
83,600
11,035
400,210
44,000
1,000
399,215
50,500
1,200
302,585
64,708
1,900
366,061
68,442
1,400
90.000
30,000
30,000
90,000
30 000
30,000
70,000
20,000
52,500
40,000
20,000
48,433
399,707
106,64C
53,823
424,248
123,707
49,813
207,713
183,280
53,735
227,000
179,000
55,000
109,454
118,036
125,422
219
112,810
47,085
3,686
10,445
21,789
65,887
3,751
111,804
48.404_
5 874
21.130
73,625
116,270
6,735
60.557
3,939
19.579
72,000
140_000
3,000
60.000
131650
26.000
92 453
42,631
1122,420
lot
932,885 (Tot)
1,000,000 (Tot)
1,0(.0,000 (Tut)
211,250 (Tot)
187,142 (Tot)
249,025 (Tot)
-
264,000 (Tot)
269 103
76,2GO
30,307
371,500
178,000
105,538
133,000
- 27,792
276,650
261,000
140000
167,000
27,000
317,800
141,000
150,000
36,450
205,000
192,000
'206,633
77,700
27,500
192,545
28,100
35,000
224,059
104,700
43.000
248,000
110,000
42,000
I40,681
26,629
79,057
33,119
68,098
39,126
146,000
38,000
INSTITUTION
BUDGET:
SALARIES (PROFESSIONAL
CLERICAL
OTHER SALARIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13 15 16
17
18
19
20
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
JOther
Prof.
197,1-72
Cler.
(c:st.)
Ott0:r
Prof.
Cler.
Other
Prof.
Cler.
Other
Prof.
Clrr.
;.
.
__
254,003
326,000
108,000
324,000
421,000
137,000
426,000
522,000
90,300
25,000
676,000
100,000
97 G2.
26 8E.4
6,015
108,096
30,728
11,050
135 500
36,800
16,555
39,180
43,645
16,580
151,932
129,418
170,200
189,436
205,750
83,200
277,595
[
I
'05 ,300 !236,167
71,000
30,400
18,038
76,200
33,750
23,490
35,400
138,445
85,500
1 38 400
34,125
49,576
35,000
f
795,300
12,441
189,300
,,74,300
640,400
67,300
,39,700
741,700
75,000
650,900
69,300
796,600
98,400
302,144
327,150
37.243
353,457
330,342
93,062
359,648
30 4 741
100,056
22,400
1
'175,000
305,000
70,000
42,100
24,904
52,400
30,794
G5,900
37,033
179,155
193,750
85,348
96.000
312,800
124,371
124,905
365 531
213,918
465756
118,098
148,325
203,813
117,800
309,0:0
150,000
?00,000
452 075
150,000
142,7517162,919
06,308
20,000
503,169
41,260
_154,.253_
13,935
50,778
240,789
32,517_1.493z51/ _159,000_
126,519
,52,572
8,000
401,709
405,155
111,954
95,405
11,072
117,643
61302
8 071
35,520
5,918
10,233
41,328
8,391
156,980
12,656
46,523
7,330
5,000
.211151
104,252
124,446
15,676
122,637
140,979
18,749
127,791
-
32,792
51,000
182,000
1
33,500
90,601
126,100
(Tot)
92,400
129,230
1,054,296 (Tot)
1,150,000 (Tot)
1,2C0,000 (Tot)
1)2,700
130,653
80,000
224,840
153,676
90,000
'38,000 1163,000
95,000
204,000
186,500
75,000
,155,260
233,500
83,240
276,492
243,298
65,000
114,200 1260,500
89,000
83,000
26,000
177,000
90.000
562,296
221,753
47.000
29,241
197,000
185,133
109,000
253,194
60,000
35,550
1133 000
'04,833 1270,563
45,784
_146,000
125,074
176,894
21,435
51,802
28,346
29,449
60,404
27,427
39,894
57,999
42,500
39,719
58,000
42,000
47,300
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
29
TOTAL BUDGET
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72 (ost
)-
1,302,591
1,722,256
2,089,729
2,320,268
252 489
261 900
321 120
348,385
544 605
672,5"0
778,150
763,919
193,938
209,596
247,010
259,901
2L304,300
324,526
f2,437 200
2,435,600.
1,729,300
1,522,500
1,603,823
1,884 053
1,900,600
262,735
233,357
254,677
912,011
1,178,659
1,165,336
1,224,720
500,000
500,000
556,418
600,000
1,559,209
1,779,821
203,055
127,183
1,676,626
1,008,000
26.i422
319,99
146,674
312,511
147,133
,2,054
412,430
481,6,40
513,631
602,000
2,229,807
2,162,381
2,250,000
2,300,000
597,610
632,995
1,127,210
759,Wi1
9652016
877,000
800,000
1,275,530
865,367
605,000
668,000
353,234
452,159
526,465
578,227
196 694
265,423
270,528
260,000
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TOTAL STAFF ACCORDING TO POSITION AND SALARY
- 4
- ('
21, -
41r
14k -
12L-.
IPA - 22%
22k -
can Sal.
it
T?t fF.T.
o_
cm o
oIumft
111F
5310 2E
F3C lE
1B
28
1A
162
ID 2E 2F 92G
1C
DSC 5U
lA
35
100G
41F
13D,1F
3C,1D
16
lA
56
19G,4F
4F
16,1C,3D . 1E
1A
15
20'
8F
,,1E
1A_
13
20 1/-c
,C
-1
20,1451
8, E, i2.
3C
SC
1C
lA 48
237
Fr.,G
83 10
11C.1.7L-1.1
50
18.5C
28
lA
146 7
28 2CG
3C_1 180,2[
3C
16
lA
87
231
18
IA
46
lE 961
GC 35D
2201111111111111111111111
A47
CE P,F
n 4D
lA
18 2 E 1F
lE
lA
7
SF
2_
27F
4C 9 D
30E 17F
18 1C 15D 12E
1B 3C 3D
2B 1C 18
1B
lA 18
90
1OF,2D
25F,11D,30
5D 4C 1B
18
lA
28F
30F,1E
lE 14D 2C
4C
1C 18
lA
81
220,25F,20
12D,7C
18
IA
4
c1
n-)
1C
1C 18
IA
68'J
-
3A
2C
lA
15
A.
Library Director
B.
Assoc/Asst Librarian
C.
Rcpt. 11:2Lds
D.
Other Professional Librarians
E.
Professionals / non-librarians
F.
Non-Prof. Staff
G.
Students
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Fal
.
lqrS
Fljl
U-pray:,
1q59
Grad
Other
Fall
U-nr;ld
1970
Grad
Othor
Fal
/U-nrad
1971
Grad
(est.)
Othnr
-grad
Grad
Other
14,026
4,603
14,224
5,151
409
13,426
5,323
37
1,976
15-17,000
'
1,660
40
1453
29
-
1,498
29
1,631
1,379
260
21
1,456
276
93
1,444
306
107
1
1,575
306
100
1,500
1,500
1,500
1
1,500
270
650
3,907
3,274
583
3098
3,399
627
4,059
3,296
444
4,044
3,164
242
3.149.
587
3.252
626
3.270
658
'
3.300_
675
1,631
102
1,910
83
2,040
144
,
2,130
170
19,122
2,346
23
20,240
2,301
84
20,405
2,193
146
20,000
2,000
200
321
50
397
50
435
50
1
471
50
3 642
1,431
4 005
1540
4 201
1484
4 425
1475
2,903
700
3,200
800
3,500
1,000
4,000
1,000
2,599
3,096
3,521
3,000
3,186
730
3,264
515
3,679
334
13,100
4,724
13,922
4,993
15,107
5,279
16,000
6,000
6,996
585
7,239
659
7,330
713
7,500
1,000
6,379
718
112
6,841
781
107
7,77,
943
119
8,134E
1,041
125
6,339
1,478
233
7,021
1,907
271
7,91EN'
2,083
245
8,00C
2,100
275
4,795
789
5,563
928
6,041
990
6,705
1,025
1,550
100
1,600
100
1641
105
1,706.
110
INST
ITU
TIO
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 -17 18,
19 20
Fall
(18
F411
969
Fall 1
70
Pall 1971
(est.)
ull-timc
Part-time
Full-til2e1Part-timn
Full-tine
Part-time
Full-tire(Part-tine
776
1,200
229
1 200
821
1 200
020
1,200
147
27
142
33
145
33
134
36
279
ff'
;303
711
293
115
121
125
120
47
11
60
942
2,055
962
2,035
915
2104
296
46
285
75
228
79
274
22
107
112
2135
1139
0
339
1,255
904
1,175.
944
1,125
950
,1,100
118
8118
10
140
12
145
12
6C.3
525
616
538
573
497
217
24
233
12
251
7
162
5100
9207
6209
7
239
120
222
120
229
120
246
120
1,073
unavailahl
1,143
U.A.
1,202
U.A.
1,225
U.A.
-r
-558
55
595
44
595
44
612
86
634
79
542
524
625
655
572
220
607
249
650
289
160
175
126
190
INS
TIT
UT
ION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
DEGREES OFFERED (PLUS NO. OF AREAS TN WHICH DEGT>EFS OFFCPED)
DA/DS
MA/MS
Ph.D
OTHERS
yes
yes
yes
CAM
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
MAT, MALS
BA
HIS
yes
MA (UJC)
yes
v,_:s
yeS
es
yes
yes
yes
no
ves
ves
yes
yes
',1decrees conferred
- curricular accredited ,.
18
rad. credit hrs.L__
ye:
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Med., M.A.T.
A.A., A.S.
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
es
yes
(13_
oth
er m
aste
rs)
8 _ether Masters)
(5 other Masters)
(5
.oth
erMastersl
_yes
Yes
yes
yes
RS
MS
1/1,.
INS
TIT
UT
ION 1 2 3 4 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
OMPUTING SERVICES TO LIP MlY
AB
CD
Model
Rent
Own
no
Source
Servs. Prod.
Mach. Tine
Materials
Labor
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
Bro -Dart, Inc.
no
no
8t; p
urch
ise
no
yes
.......
no
ves
serial list
S__/ 1000
,___
no
no
R services
no charge
no
no
no
no
. 11111111
El no
fund accauntinn
$3,000
nrnnthly
no
no
______
serial list
no
no
Univ. financial control
no
no
Current neriodtols
LATH; /LC cards/serials listtgdm.
Irrenular serials list
finance
Research funding
list/
reports
no
ves
no
no
no
no
monthly budget
report/periodicals
I
nomina
no
no
A.
Does library have own computer
B."
Does library receive computer based services other than WI or camnus computer
C.
If library uses campus ccmnuter center, what catenary of services produced
D.
If charged for campus computer, current annual expenditures charged
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
rT gn n
irr
,pn
rc
TCITT D
rF
13
1
21
44
44
11
1
23
22
1
23
23
33
14
13
32
43
14
14
44
44
14
43
31
21
12
3
44
44
33
2
34
21
13
41
3
42
3
13
11
43
44
1
22
41
42
(+ printed lists - Local acouisits
42
44
14
21
12
23
Please indicate by checking a point on the scale next to each question, the degree to which the suggested
services would be desirable in'helping you solve problems which your library is now facing:
PRIORITY
SCALE: 1, 2, 3, 4 (1,,,highest priority)
A.
Fund accounting control
B.
Reduce redundant purchases with other libraries
C.
Centralized document processing center for acquisitions
D.
Centralized acquisitions record keeping by NN w/document processing done locally
E.
Increase book budget as a proportion of library bud(:,2t
F.
Other services relating to acquisitions, e.g., S.D. from MARC to selectc,rs
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NELINET AND LOCAL PRIORITIES:
CATALOGING
.
G
11
.1
11
4.
4
11
11
11
1-1
11
23
13
43
4
21
12
2.
44
11
11
14
4
11
11
44
4
11
11
31
2_
2
11
11
12
12
44
3
32
21
44
2
3i
1 1
______J
______Z
11
4 2
4 21
1
11
11
14
11
11
14
a
11
22
N/A
43
32
22
44
23
23
44
4
A.
On-Line shared cataloging, reduce redundancy of cataloging in region
B.
Reduce staff costs of cataloging
C.
Minimize the frequency of original cataloging
D.
Increase rate of processing per staff member
E.
Eliminate dependence upon proof slips or depository cards for cataloging or acquisition
F.
Discontinue card catalog and begin book catalog production
G.
Convert card or book catalog to microform
PRIORITY SCALE 1, 2, 3, 4 (1..highest priority)
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NELINET AND LOCAL PRIORITIES:
SERIALS CONTROL
AEl
11
12
12-
21
12
11
11
have
11
12
32
12
31
11
13
21
11
21
Periodic list of local holdinns (monthly); automate bindinn processinn
24
Institutional list of current subscriptions
2
su Cr
A.
Provide a machine file for producing union lists of serials
1
B.
Automate such control functions as check-in, missing issue claims, etc.
C.
Other serial functions:
PRIORITY SCALE 1, 2, 3, 4
(1.41ighest priority)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NELINET AND LOCAL PRIORITIES:
CIRCULATION AND INTERLIBRARY LOAN
LH. (4
AB
C
12
33
32
Mechanize services for locating titles (i.e., data bank)
13
44
Straight autnmation of simole circulati66
m -
.66
'.-
32
Produce overdue notices
41
14
Automate overoups, fines, etc.
11
1 44
12
14
14
13
Control fine reporting, payment for lost books, etc., control student payroll
11
14
Evaluate patceri,s of materials use - (i.e., to duplicate heavier used items)
12
Automatic billing for fines and lost boolo:
44
44
A.
Mechanize circulation and interlibrary loan with on-line query to circulation file
8.
To institute an accounting system for paying and receiving monies for interlibrary loan
transactions to and from other libraries
C.
Other activities relating to this category
PRIORITY SCALE 1, 2, 3, 4 (lehighest priority)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NELINET ANC LOCAL PRIORITIES:
REEERENCE AND PPFLIC SERVICES (PART I)
12
13
11
24
1
31
2
32
32
44
34
13
14
14
41
33
12
3
34
23
13
22
2
43
13
1
34
11
24
44
12
23
33
32
32
22
A.
Increase the number of hihliogranbers and subject :Tecialists to reduce need for blanket orders,
annroval plans and other non-selective devices.
B.
Establish a shared comnact storage facility with other New England libraries, for serials and
monographs
C.
Establish a shared microfilming facility for worn or seldom used materials, including selected
government documents
0.
Increase the use of your collections by both local and regional libraries and patrons
.PRIORITY SCALE 1, 2, 3, 4 (1=highest priority)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
REFERENCE AND PUELIC SERVICES:
PRIORITIES (PART II)
EF
G
32
41
11
31
32
43
-
11
44
31 1
44
31
22
..
1
41
31
41
32
On demand bibliographies produced; sharing
of bibliographic expertise
42
32
E.
Increase your access to state library resources
F.
Increase your access to regional library
resources
G.
Other public service activities
PRIORITY SCALE 1, 2, 3.
4 (1=highest priority)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
NELINET AND LOCAL PRIORITIES:
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
.
2 21
Acc,,isition by funds; acquisition by subject categories
1 1 31
Develop useable standards for different classes of
activities
1 2 1 2 2 1 12
Est. report sys. to indicate specific use and non-useof reserve books
22
Management data collecting, use data, opinion
sampling etc.
2
A.
Increase the timeliness of reports relating to
specified operations in your library, perhaps
comparing them with the same functions at other
similar libraries in the region, e.g., cataloging
rates and costs
B.
Other management information
INSTITUTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
1415
16
17
18
1920
CURRENT NELINET SERVICES
Il_
1.
31
.1
13
15
210
514
11
12
p Peg. by Call
i x,'
3, 2, 1
55
4?
?
2, 14
15, 4
12
17
01
313
G7
16
95
11
10
47, 6. 8, 9
10
411
31?
61.
14 0
5 5
15 7
15 7
0
11
0
14
6
13MIN
12
1
30
40
','
4. 3
76
98
15
10
16
17
17_1_ lr
2F
15
14
S1
13
3'2
411
10
9
IL
2,_
;7.
h1
23
5'
7
1, 4, 2
11
12
2
12
3
12
51
13
415
14
67
11
10
9--....,2,_r ,.
.
21
3
..,,
1,
/9
81
43
24
15
64
23
A. 12. 3, 13
511
10
21
14
15
69
87
4:.7.,
1.
76
14
715
)2
21
13
91U
11
I/
6
3, h. 7. 9
10
n1
56
11
12
14
15
16
1'4
-,
15
54
56
21
7
J. 2,
1. 4
213
14
67
35
10
89
12
11
4
2, 1, 3
913
810
54
14
67
1:,
12
11
In the current catalog support sub-system, would younumber the follow4ig possible system developments
in the order of preference:
A.
Capability to request UELINET products in the batched system by:
Main Entry Only, Title Only,
Main Entry and Title, Series
B.
Capability to print diacritics
C.
Capability to produce Book Catalogs
D.
Type-set card products, i.e. so they appear as LC printed cards
E.
Capability to print 8 lines to the inch, instead of the current 6 lines to the inch
F.
On-line search by LC card number
G.
On-line search by author/title
H.
A listing of MARC by LC class number to aid acquisitions
I.
Capability to pre-sort the card set so that they arrive at your library in
order for direct filing
into your catalogs
J.
Greater flexibility in the way in which the call number is printed on thecatalog card
K.
The ebility to put local notes an the catalog cards
L.
The ability to re',uest by ISSN number
M.
jn-line encoding of requests for the batched system
N.
encoding of bibliographic records, (i.e.
non-MARC i':ems) for the batched system
O.
17)!..hr orqiers
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
CO
C)
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18.
19 20
TO
TA
L
ACQUISITIONS;
STAFF AND SALARY
,A.S.
0r
11 2 5
9,655
0
8,900
1.67
10,000
0
23
6,139
- _
A S
6,500
1
27 420
6 433
56,000
3,000
3 90
0
2,05/hr
.75
5
6,90
0.2
5
9,55
01950
.8.1
,189
3328 cin
0
10,200
18,400
18
4.925
0
.50
1
2463
2,.,3
5_
- -
1,750
13328
In
c RF4
16
17n/h
17,4:7
1.5
210,400
04
5,200
94,492
12
j8,333
17,
800
4 640
75.888
44,750
3,000
310,120
6,50
07
4,200
1.500
02
AV
ER
AG
E
lao selection incld.
2 .5
60.7
5
10,0
009,
880
7800
44,825
1.5
1,5uu
5,35
05
7800
63,860
178
002,475
7800
35,600
r wk
3120
stu ents
47.87
$152538
11.42
$47140
114.8
96129
32.1
3.38
$43536
$9533
.63
$5893
6.04
$5341
1.78
$3628
A.
Full -time professionals, bitIliogra7,hers
B.
Part-tinQ
C.
Cieric.11
D.
Pert-tire clerical
C.
Other
A.S.
Avert
salary
NA
266
NA
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NUMBER CF BLANKET ORDER/A:=PROVAL PLANS - PERCENT U:
CVR:VNT ACQUISITIONS
Nam
XName
%Name
zNam
at;r
xTotal
_
4
a
CILA
1Kuban & Sagne
Harrassowitz
'Blanchetot
1
Ahel/ALAP
27
;
5Abel
30
Blanchetot
Abel
10
Corner Book
11
Eastern Book
35
DeWolfe & Fisk
l'
Orbit Book
6Univ. Microfi
ri
i
Rosenbern
Varrassowitz
Oucharme
Abel
20
Baker & Taylo'
1U. Microfilm
Harrassowitz
5Touzot
10
S/0
10
Strand
All pub. standing orders = 15% of total (approx.)
100 publishers stdndinn orders
Harrassowitz
?Blancheteau
?Abel
4?
10 Pub.
1Barbazan
,
2CILA
Oxford U.P.
VA
none
._
.
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ae
C0
E
22
2
1 11
11 1
00
0.
0
o0
NUS
.
oo
MCRS
o0
o0
0
00
flCRS
00
11
11
o0
22
11
11
o0
00
0o
00
22
2
11
1
11
1
o0
00
o0
00
.
A.
Used for book-selection
0Neither used
B.
Used for order copy verification
1Proof-slips used.
C.
Used for cataloging proof-copy
2Depository cards used
D.
Used for card production
E.
Other
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20
COMPUTER USED FOR AC UTSITIONS SUPPCRT?
To What Extent
What Purpc'..r!
Cost
aiwowerelrnN,ed
-
Small
Fund Control
1 pro/20 min/mo
411 orders
In process file
4200/ino
(S2,000)
All orders
In process file
Not
et o erative
CDC
.
All orders
Lists
2 clerical
bookkeepine
3 000
2 clerical 67 hrs
Al' orders.
Order orint-outi
2 typists,
1S. Analyst
BATAS
-re treeflt-r-01.--
t.....
.---
INSTITUTION
iC
UR
RE
NT
FIS
CA
L. Y
EA
R:
WH
AT
PE
RC
EN
T O
F IT
EM
S A
RE
:
In*rints (Post '6P
p-
Pre
'69
Cur
rent
_
1 2 3
55%
45%
80%
20%
90%
10%
490
7.10
%
520
%80
%
690
%10
Z
780
%20
%
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
60%
40%
81%
19%
98%
2%
90%
10%
75%
25%
70%
30%
61%
39%
75%
25%
86.7
5%13
.25%
65%
35%
60%
40%
75%
Ave
rage
.73
,.,78
26.2
2 %
Per
cent
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18 19 20
Average
PENENT OF AC UISITICNS INITIATED BY:
Faculty
Lib. Staff
Gifts
Others
45%
45%
9%
1%
60%
30%
10%
75%
20%-
5%
---,
80%
15%
.4%
1%
-
20%
70%
10%
33%
56%
10%
1
1%
.
..w
34%
GO%
6%
--1
2F.
65%
f"..'
15%
?Ls%
20%
1%
1%
2%
96%
1%
1%
75%
22%
3%
---,..------
32%
53%
10%
54%
35%
11%
1
29%
40%
1%
30%
i1
60%
40%
95%
1/2%
5-1/2%
25%
55%
20%
82%
16%
2%
50%
50%
.,---
..
48%
40%
Minimum
2%
.5%
Maximum
95%
96%
000`09
000'17 ,
000'017
000`.017
006'91C
009 EVZ
ES0'1EZ
00Z'917
00Z'917
000.17C
OCCOE
GOO'OSZ
009'GOC
00e11717
009'SfiC
000'0?
SZO'GtZ
?hint
OSZ'112
000'009
000 OGG
002'9E9
000'9ZZ
9017'961
917C'121
CL3'9S1
000191
000'SL
000'09
It71'SG
000 001
000 001
000'0G
000'02
003 009
Let/ ZLV
62t,'9Lt,
S99.88C
190'95E
S9S'ZOC
51Z'66E
01Z'OOt,
9Z9'56
S96'G9
Ong!.
000'095
99YZLS
1702'1217
8176'905
00t7'9C9
000'6E9
00Z'CG
0017'1L17
ELS 191
006'ZS
0017'90
OW9L
0017(99
00t,'9G
6CetiZZ
17E9'EEZ
000 OLZ
299'Z01
L99'8Z
1.61'9Z
G164EZ
J00 CZ
000'006
000'EZ6
000'519
000'9617
U-It61
1L-OL61
OL-6961
69-3961
111WANKUT741-MIA1
M4 111142A
Km
nilicinMV
OZ
61
81L1
91Sl
blE
l
Z1Ll
016L9NOIJMLILSNI
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
COULD ACQUISITIONS SYSTEM 2E IMPROVED?
Yes
N 0
P,ottlPr,76-1
(-1,(ro,
,,-,
T1
..-------
xVerification of LC entry
x
XVerification - delay in ordering
x x xSlow vendors, etc.
.
xSearching, accounting
Pre-order search data
xWhole system
xSearching and verification
x
x xSearching, etc.
x.-
x
,,,,
x
x
x x x'
On order file
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Libr
ary
Bu5. Orr..
athe'.:__
no
no
.
Comptroller's Ofc.
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
_____ no
yes
Reg. Fin. Ctr.
Lno
no
no
yes
no
no
State Compt. Ofc.
no
yes
no
yes
..___
no
no
State Ofc.
no
yes
---_--
no
yes
.
no
no
State Purcnasing
r
no
yes
no
yes
INSTITUTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
AC
Q12
:ITIO
S:5
AN
D C
AT
ALO
GIN
G
A.
AB (Please describe)
no
yes
_yes
yes
yes
no
yes
Ed
yes
(to order LC cards)
yes
Slight
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
Use m/o form, proofslips/IDC MCRS, etc.
90-45 acceptable
yes
/0
no
:;ot sufficiently accurate
yes
Abel cards ordered with books
yes
Pre -order data used by catalogers
8.
Pre-crCer data used by otners
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
COORDINATION BETWEEN ACQUISITIONS AND FACULTY:
.
,
AD
CD
EF
Yes
no
Description of other (F)
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
x x
not able to be bibliographically
iden
tifie
d.yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
x.
yes
yes
yes
'yes
xCataloged
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes no
x
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
x
yes
yes
In process
yes
yes
yes
yes
x
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes no
yes
yes
yes
x
yes
no
x xyes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
x
yes
_yes
yes
yes_
yes
yes
yes
yes
_yes_
yes
yes
_yes
yes
yes
x
yes
x
yes
yes
xMen cataloged
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
x
no
yes
yes
yes
no
x
Do faculty merd)ers initiate order requests?
If YES, arc they notified if an item is:
A.
On order
B.
Re.jected
C.
Not available
D.
Received
E.
Already owned
F.
Other
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WELL-DEFINED
E EC
POLICY?
Yes
Nu
Statew?.nt or Description
x.
.
ComprehenSive policy expected by June 1972
-
xNo written statement
xAll faculty reqs. are accepted until dept'l. fund is exhausted.
x
xUnwritten
xWritten for engineering library
..
xBudgetary limitations
xYes
xJudgement of faculty and library staff
xScreened by Hd.
, Acqs.; Hd., Tech. Processing; and :lir. _EducatiQnal Resource_ranter
xUnwritten
xOn the basis of cost vs. need.
Sometimes orders are postponed rather than re4sct.sd
xAccording to reviews
x x xBy faculty according to departmental priorities
xFaculty
x xRejected in some cases on basis of excessive cost
x
INSTITUTION
ACQUISITION - CENTRALIZED SELECTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 711
-10-
18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
A8
--,
CD
E
.
no
yes
yes
.
49%
.
no
*yes
1.012%
no
no
yes
530%
.,
yes
yes
413%
.
no
no
yes
13
1001
.
.os
yes
yes
833%
----
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
4,
yes
yes
414%
;.
_no
not yes
2
no
no
yes
320%
no
yes
yes
527%
r
no
yes
yes
12%
no
yes
1
no
yes
.
_
A.
Is selection centralized for all of the institution's libraries
U.
If not, is there sufficient coordiantion of selection as the system operates
C.
Are itt s received for branches processed thru a central acquisitions system
D.
Isf YES, for hew many branches
E.
What percent of total acquisitions is for the branches
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 19
20
ACQUISITIONS - COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS
12
34
5
no
yes
Local
Problems of access, status, change and politics
no
Demands on staff time
no
yeF,
more
most
local
Institutional autonomy
yes
HILC
no
yes
74 or more
Distance, a communications problem; enforcement of selecti
no
yes
misc.
Task retrieval of materials
pdli.
yes no
yes
expensive
mat-
Faculty desire for material at hand; allocation of funds
-
no
local
Security problems
The nuisance of havinq material where
ou don't want it.
yes no
possibly
local
ConflictS_Or eunstve_n_necessary" dupliratinn
no
yes
resh. mat.
Inaccessibility of materials
no
yes
Faculty wants and librarians egos
yes
yes
UHCUC
no
yes
all
Pressures by facult
for com rehensive coverae in their
Communications
field
yes no
yes
WACL
Lack of union cat.
D = Discriptive response
1.
Is there any cooperative acquisitions with other institutions
2.
If NOT, is there any need for such a program
3.
In what areas (record total numler)
4.
With what institutions
5.
kajor
to making a cooperative acquisitions program work
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
13
14
15
16 17
18
19
20
ACQUISITIONS - COOPERATIVE
PROGRAMS (EXPENSIVE ITEMS)
AG
11
.
.
11
11
11
11
-
11
.
11
-
11
-
1-
1
2.
2
22
22
12
11
12
11,2
11
A.
To what denree in favor of
participating in a program
of cooperative acquisitions
of expensive or seldom
used materials?
B.
If these materials were
not housed at your institution,
how would you feel?
1.
Very much in favor
2.
Somewhat in favor
3.
Somewhat
against
4.
Adamantly against
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
s9
crt
10 11 12 13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20,
FILES USED IN AMISIIIONS
A 10
LC entr /A-Z also
cards
66K + tubs
1
6cards
8K (description attached)
10
A-Z
cards
130K
LC entry
cards
2K
title
cards
2-1/2K
A-Z
cards
185K
7A-7
cards
54K
7main entry
cards
3K
.
17
A-Z
cards
--
.3
A-Z
5A-Z
cards
11K
8A-Z
....
A-Z
cards
12
A-Z
cards
14K
A-7
cards
176K + (310K = depository catalog)
A-Z
cards
15-1/2K
10
A-7
cards
14K + (11 cabinets)
5A-Z
cards
34K
3A-Z
cards
15K
3misc.
cards
6K
1
A.
Total numtler of files
B.
Arrangeo:ent of files
C.
U:ual redium
D.
Total average size of files
1.
Estimate based on 100 cards to 1 inch, 10 inches to a drawer
2.
Slips considered as cards
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SIZE OF STAFF
16
9,600
15
.6,604
95,460
33,640
29,362
25,542
25,472
.37
51.60/hr
611,271
65,370
65,822
5 other
6,000
19,300
24,350
.5
1,750
1$1.60/hr
110,000
\r3,000
36,000
21,750
10
10,375
16
6,074
14,160
4783
6?
10
10
2
26,825
01.5
4,291
5 (owe
51.60/hr
79,929
55,100
34,500
42,250
411,000
56,500
15,500
0- --
21
9,800
15
5,025
li
5,025
120 hr/week 0 51.70/hr
19,3'8
16,667
35,245
26,056
*
18,400
0---
01
430
59,500
24,576
34,056
25,252
613,845
7.
7,934
65,635
,
68,100
55,138
00
'7.5
10,125
94,430
12
3,892
1 admin asst
6,760
78,84]
64,747
13,150
15,696
59,456
46,529
3.5
1
4 640. ?
73,769 ?
1.5
?1
?
A.
Full-tiwe professional
B.
Average salary
C.
Full-tiwe clerical assistants
D.
Averaye salary
E.
Full-time typists
F.
Average salary
G.
Students (F.T.E.)
H.
Salary
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CATALOG FiliDGET - ANKUAL
106P-109
irc9 -1n70
1970-1971
1q71-1q7? LF-t )
163,236
296,393
321,443-
41,229
38,165
49,106
50,567
90,059
110,998
143,950
150,045
23,846
24,626
36,200
224,165
232,975
214,313
.223,939
157,935
175,055
182,055
180,000
104,434
129,819
152,117
4,194
7,368
5,000
5,000
56,170
67,729
69,850
83,000
130,000
150,000
200,000
"
210,000
73,050
89,429
98,329
104 000
160,850
182,850
190,521
'
177,400
72,500
82,000
103,000
103,000
90,167
119,807
133,794
140,893
..-..
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
'ta
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS USED
A8
C---
LC
Biscoe book number
no
10,000
LC
Dewey - Special Collections
yes
95
500
LC
Special Collections
yes - Cutter
50
7,000
LC
No PZ, Dewey for K
no
250
LC
,no
600
LC
Cutter No (100%)
yes - 3
40
5,000
LC
yes - Dewey
66
500
LC
yes - Dewey
18
LC
None
yes
Dewey
----
95
2,500
LC
Standard No.
yes
13
60
LC
Law
yes - Cutter
4,000
LC
yes - Dewey
36
4,500
LC
no
...-
300
LC
Periodicals
no
500
LC
Periodicals - unclassified
, ------
yec - Dewey
85
3,000
LC
Dewey
yes
80
1,150
LC
Periodicals - Juveniles
yes - Dewey
yes - Dewey
no
25
40
1,000
2,500
LC
Serials
Juveniles
Dewey
Periodicals - Special Collections
LC.
Periodicals - PZ
yes - Dewey
55
200
A.
Class system used
B.
Uhat variations used
C.
Oldc:r classes still shelved?
What class?
D.
What percent of total collections = older classes?
E.
Average number of titles actively "in process"
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BACKLOG An CREAKDO
English
Monographs
Non-English
AB
Curron*
Retro..
Current
Rptrn
Other
yes
8,500
4,439
1,479
.903
1s
yes
100
yes
yes
no
yes
1,000
4,250
800
750
200
yes
2,000
'
1200
550
250
no
yes
3,000
2250
450
2,700
550
yes
1,738
738
354
yes
67,375
es
970
yes
2,798
1,500
500
350
300
yes
4,500
1,100
1,875
650
175
yes
30,000
5,000
10,000
5,000
20,000
yes
480
80
375
45
yes
500
100
100
300
yes
9,731
5,000
2,500
1,800
600
yes
2,625
'yes
150
100
A.
Do you now have a backlog?
B.
If YES, what size in titles?
INS
TIT
UT
ION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 1F.
17 18 19 20
PRIORITY CATEGORIES FOR PROCESSING
Demand/rush
.Reserve/rush
Course expedite
Current/new
Rush requests
Current
Reference material
All other
-
Rush reserves
Rush requests
LC copy available
Orders without LC
Rush reserve
~Course
Rush faculty request
Literature
- wo\k need
Faculty requests
Student request
General orders
Rush - patro
or reserve
Multi-volume sets
Multiple copies
.
No priorities
Reserve
Reference
New acquisitions
Reclass
Reserve
Request
Divisional library
Reference
Major serials
Curriculum materials
Special requests
Notify
LC copy available
_..1.
Rush
Rush faculty
Faculty reserve
Current faculty
Faculty requests
Reserves
Faculty requests
Student requests
Perfect LC copy
Rush materials
NU,: copy.
No copy
Reserves
Books for Darling
Orders
Gifts
Rush
Browse
Dept. orders
Reference books
NELINCT cards
LC cards
Original cards
Rush books
Popular reading
Reference materials
Rush
Faculty & staff requests
Pollution & Ecology books
Timely titles
INSTITUTION
AVEP.AGE CATALOGING PICCESSWG TME
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Depends on type of material and type of LC copy available
About 5 to 6 weeks wait about 1 month for LC cards
Three months to 5 months
One month
One week (little cataloging done in-house)
__-
Three months
.
All %CAP material held until LC copy available
Three to 4 weeks if cards ordered'from LC;
1 week for ALAP books - cards
.
Three months
One week
One day to 2 years
Eight weeks
Three months
Five weeks
Six weeks (if no typing backlog, 2 weeks for books with copy).
I
.
Three weeks
Four months
Two-to 3 weeks
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
..........
...
-_______
... ____
AC
C
25
15-20
(only used for authorization of names)
Es
51
25-30
10
30
8
5
26
4
5
20
2
20
49
35
10
7
SO
10
10
30
20
6
13.9
.
30
10
10
3.5
10
What percent of titles that go through your-department are done:
A.
With no L.C. copy available
B. with no N.U.C. copy available
C.
With no secondary source copy available
INSTITUTION
LANGUAGES PROCESSED (PERCENT OF T TA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
AVERAGE
RANGE MIN.
RANGE MAX.
English
Romance Language
11.
Germanic
Other
1968-71
Pre 1968
1968-71
Pre 1968
1958 -71
Pre 1968
1968-71
Pre 1968
TOTAL
52
18
11
67
32
1100%
75
010
05
010
0100%
80
08
09
03
0100%
93
05
02
00
0100%
19
76
.6
2.4
0.2
0.8
0.2
0.8
100%
89
05.3
03.3
02.4
0100%
55
10
94
84
82
100%
S8
40
1-
1-
100Z
76
17.5
2.25
2.25
0.7
3.
.5
100%
93
22
11
1100%
40
025
020
015
0100%
64
21
7.5
2.5
3,8
1.2
00
100%
20
070
010
00
0100Z
41
26
10
710
41
1100%
84
10
40
1.
01
0100%
79
12
3.5
.5
3.5
.5
.75
.25
100%
49
26
10
53
23
2100%
90
0=
40
50
10
100%
64.2%
14.4%
10.4%
7.7%
6.6%
1.1%
2.8:
7%
20%
OT
1%
0%
.2%
0%
0%
0%
in
76%
70%
i7%
20%
4%
15%
2%
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TALOG COP
A1\
A2
A3
ar
B2
B3
(
yes
.
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes (picrst
yes
yes
yes (mcrOk
yes
yes
yes
.-
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
_yes
yes
yes
1yes
yen
A.
Are L.C. proof-slips used?,..
If YES, are they used for
B.
Are deposicory cards used?----"
*MGRS refers to the Micrographic
Catalog Retrieval System
marketed by Information
Dynamics, Inc.
1.
Catalog copy which is re-typed
2.
C.C. which is reproduced
3.
01:iler
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SERIALS CATALOGING
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Alpha notation plus cutter
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Yes
yes
Dewey
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
Periodicals Kardex
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
,yes
A.
!s seriols catalcrjno performed by a separate cataloging
group from monographs?
C.
Are periouicals classified?
C.
If not, please ,-.scribe?
0.
Are other seri
; classified?
E.
If YES, are they cataloged in same manneras monographs?
F.
If not, please describe?
INSTITUTION
FILING:
HOW MANY HOURS SPENT PER WEEK,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
.16 17.
18
19
20
Supervision & Checking 1
Filing
Prof.
Non-Prof.
Prof.
Non-Prof.
36
.
100
610
24
113
11
19
10
530
r
7'
35'
10
55
70
220
940
525
610
79
40
4.5
1.5
7
45
10
513
4.5
159.5
10
10
15
37.5
L125
15
310
19
52.5
10
15
'Does not include sorting and alphabetizing
INSTITUTION
REASSIGNMENT OF CATALOGERS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
yes
xx
x
yes
x
yes
x
yes
yes
xx
x
yes
yes no
yes
x
yes
x
yes
x
yes
xx
x.
no
xx
x
yes
x
yes
x
yes-
xx
x
A.
Does
t;',2 librarian feel that catalogers could be
..-,sfgned to public service role if
cataloging workloads were reduced?
if 'ES, to:
1.
L',:b.liosrr:Dhy
2.
To reference!
3.
Look s,Aection
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
1C
17
18
19
20
__d___
yes
no
All.
Most HUC libraries excepting subject headings and conflict inentry.
yes
no
Processing time
Any library following LC standards
- Yale, Dartmouth
no
yes
Card production
Yale, Harvard
yes
yes
Processing time
NUC - with scrutiny of subject headings
yes
yes
Speed
Probably most
yes
no
Cards & class.
Yale
yes
no
-,
Cards & Authority
Any LC compatible system
yes
no
Serials
Harvard, Dartmouth
yes
no
_Filing
Any LC - AA code compatible library
yes
yes
Shared Cat.
yes
no
Copy retrieval
Yale
yes
yes
Processing
Most NUC copy acceptable
yes
yes
.
yes
yes
yes
Cards
Yale, Harvard
no
Yale, Harvard
es
Car prod. & s.c.
No
Any compatible with LC
es
_yes
yes
Possibly Yale, Harvard
yes
yes
ves
yes
Elim. charges
Serials
Yale, Harvard, Dartmouth, M.I.T.
Harvard, Boston University
yes
yes
A.
Does librarian feel thJt.pi-csnt c;italooing systc;'i could be i.:.proved?
B.
Is there sufficient coordination br,tween acqu:sitions anJ catalcling?
C.
;Mat area of catalo9ing cc.:!(1 be most iLproved by use of computers?
re-4 EnOand libraries
cataloging you would accept - without
basic chars in call number?
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
cn
UD
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
.16
17
18
19
20
CATALOG FILING A
8C1
C2
ri
A-Z, ALA rules
Plain A-Z, subject classed
59
12
17
arnegie filing rules
Dictionary
CDictionary
40
12
61
-z word by word
Dictionary
10
1
"LA
Dictionary
30
4
LA (1942)
Divided (LC): Dictionary (Dewey)
28-
53
ALA (2nd ed.)
Divided
90
10
35
lix of LC - ALA
Divided
10
28
(ALA (2nd ed.)
Dictionary
35
51/2
ALA
Divided
Dictionary
15
-1/2
8-1/2
Cleveland
1j.,A
Divided (by drawer)
(-."
5-1/2
1-1/2
ALA
Divided
-_-__
15
5
ALA (1942)
Dictionary
.15
3
ALA
Divided
89
22-1/2
52-1/2
%LA
Dictionary
33
2
ALA (1st ed.)
^ivided
35
8
ALA (local modification)
Dictionary
Divided
18
23.7
il..,%
ALA (new ed.)
Dictionary
15
_1
A.
Uhat filing system is usei for your rain catalog?
B.
liow are your public catalogs arrc.nct:d (dictionary, etc.)?
C.
Ho:, many hours per week spent for filing in:
1.
Main catalog
2.
Shelf list
3.
Departmental files
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14 15
16
17
18
19
20
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
AL
FIL
ES
AB
C
14
A-Z, class
2.5M
15
Class
207K
12
A-Z
2.211
11
Class
180K
120K
11
A-Z/Class
663K*
6Class
650K*
3A-Z
110K'
2750K
7A-Z
3K
10
A-Z
2.23M
3A-Z
114K
10
A-Z/Class
34K
6A-7
2.5
31+*
A-Z
2M
14
A-Z
1.751.1
11
A-7
4113K
9A-Z
5*
A-Z
104K*
* Does not include public catalogs
*.'!-..ust figures based on 1000 cards per drawer
A.
bu;:.5er of files
B.
Most co=on arranger...eht
C.
Average-size of files (i.e., of total files)
INSTITUTION
WOULD YOU BE IN FAVOR OF
YOUR LIBRARY PARTICIPATING
IN NELINET?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16 17
18 19
20
Yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
No
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
INS
TIT
UT
ION
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF
UELINET CATALOG SUPPORTPRODUCTS?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
10
11 12 13
14
15 16
17
18 19
20
Acceptable.
We will have to use a
2-step process for
ordering
Adequate for our needs
Perfectly acceptable
Have not tested
them yet
Excellent quality, standard,
acceptable, not enough
allowance for local variation
(i.e., format, call No., etc
Satisfactory
Selin labels
excellent, pleased with
card labels
Impressed and loom
forward to their use
Acceptable on the basis
of limited use to
date
.
.
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
SPECIFIC COrlflE.IlTS ON SEPVICE ACCEPTABILITY
12
Mill
45
.7
8.
yes
yes
yes
no
.,
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
5
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
10
yes
yes
yes
Our call # breaks differently
yes
ves
no
14
y.,,
yes
no
e use blank book pockets
yes
39
yes
yes
yes
ap, accession
,.ocation
not combined F. provision f/rottinq
ves
yes
yes
yes
'.f-2S
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
i'o
yes
yes
yes
es
.;es
too
11
yes
yes
no
2
yes
yes
yes
too.
;es - mucn
1., ..r call # breaks differently
fo experience, but expect the:
Ito be usable_
ves
yes
7-
yes
yes
yes
no
alF F runs horizontally across
6.ep
q.9 need
to run vertically
SPECIFICALLY, DO YOU FEEL THAT:
1.
They can save manpower effort?
.
.2.
They are esthetically acceptable?
3:
They are easily read by users?
4.
There is too much/too little print on the cards?
5.
Identify specific problems
6.
Are book pocket labels used in your library?
own lett edge
7.
Are the Selin labels usable by your
library?
8.
Are the sets too expensive?
9.
How many catalogs do you have on campus
which would include NELINET products?
(Count divided catalogs separately)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 2 13
14 15
16 17
18
19
20
DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENT ACQUISITIONS BY
LANGUAGE AND DATE
TOTAL %
Pre-1968
Post-1968
IMIII
IIIIII
III1
23
45
67
81
23
45
67
81
23
70
85
410
310 00
18
22
23
128
52
63
27
272
75
44
25
37
000
80
51
110
32
100
80
51
110
32
10.0
30
51
110
32
100
93
22
1100
86
41
31
1111
100
10
10
11111
11
21
217
90
65
65
212
55
55
54
2-
10
43
83
92
41
k1-
1100
18
50
50
50
30
40
50
82
SO
-50
50
70
160
50
96
13
100
40
10
510
20
510
100
15
85
84
100
85
84
---1
100
85
;8
4100
I3
fI 3
CO
10
10
57
100
35
75
75
100
80
MIN
M=
, ,20
G5
35
i100
!
.
,
95
j100
95
---4
100
95
100
t5
I5
1-
5
WHAT PERCENT OF YOUR ACQUISITIONS IS:
1.
English
-5.
Germanic
2.
French
6.
Russian
3.
Spanish
7,
Other
4.
Italian
8.
Total
SYSTEM 0EvELOPMNT OPT10115 PRI:RUNGE
23
45
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
MD
13
2L
44
96
7a
22
1.
4
33
21
97
11
10
64
514
17
16
a12
10
15
47
GC
94
62
36
5
5 67
65,
810
14
17
92
115
13
11
12
16
43
714
12
913
a17
15
10
21
54
76
16
311
a 9
1111
110
113
311
52
14
12
6C
910
11
12
43
15
14
12
17
51
29
61G
13
lc
73
10
13
43
19
10
36
14
31
58
24
67
15
1
16
17
le
19
.
20
I
Num0CR TILE FOLL0w14 POSSUM: sYSTEm DEVELOPEuTS TO TIE GATA1.06MG SUPPORT SUMSTEM 14 ORDER OF PREFERENCE;
.1a
Capability.to request ALINET products in the batched system by:
Main Entry Only
lb
Title Only
lc'
Main Entry & Title
.
Id
.
2Capability to print diacritics
3Capability to produce Book Catalogs;
4Type-set catalog cards, i.e. so they appear as LC printed cards
4S
Capability to print 3 lines to the inch instead of the current 6 lines to theiinch
cu
6On-line search by LC card number
C7- __.
7On-line search by rain entry/title
8A listing of ::ARC by LC class. number to aid acquisitions
CD
9Capability to pre-sort the card sets so that they arrive at your library in order for direct filing
P1into your catalogs
c10
Greater flexibility in the way in which the call number is printed on the catalog card
n1
11
The ability to put local notes on the catalog card
1
12
The ability to request by ISM nutr.ber
_...,
13
On-line encoding of requests for the batched system
14
On -lire encoding of bibliographic records (i.e.; non-MARC items) for the batched system.
15
Other options (please describe)
INST
ITU
TIO
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
o- o10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2C
1
WHAT IS THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF REQUESTS
SENT TO NELINET PER MONTH?
100
400 (10O /week)
100
200/mcnth - (50 requests/week)
because of budget
750
Total 1,550
Average/library 258
INSTITUTION
WHAT CRITERIA DETERMINES WHAT
T
2 3 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
I'mediate need for material - gifts
Items for which no cards are available from ALAP
MARC on card; perfect LC cony; closed entry; blue stamp not on Lack of DC; not for special area
:lo branch numbers, fiction or music bibliography.
Generally, farts of series are not sent.
LC number on back of title page, do not include branch libraries
Encl. lannuc,21 LC car # 69 prefix or above; LC card # 68 prefix, with 1969-imprint
.
LC card order #'s of the 69 or any of the 70 series {English language)
INSTITUTION
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14 15
16
17
18 19.
20
_AT WHAT POINT OF PROCESSING DO YOU REOUEST NELINET-PRODUCTS?
At point of order if card order No. is easily available;
bk. in hand if card order No.has not been determine
r After cataloging, when cards are given to reviewer.
Cook in hand, if no oroofsli. is available
i;ook in hand from order department
Cook in hand in acquisitions department
After cataloging (i.e., classification)
1 2 3 4 6 7 10 11 1 14 16 17 9
--
"::::.:.
LC:
Y:JU
ii. ...V
TU i:AIT
F!-'Z'J'I
"DIE
T'..
:.YUU PP.1.LLi
IU
I la.
II
.t.
FUO r-,........i...
.....-.
.1.:
...)
....
:.
..
1f.1
.
11
'::P...
-,......:
.
3f C.-c
re,.:!.:s1:s
INSTITUTION
L)
":JST
CI,:ALCG SUPPUT SEPACLS?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1G.
c)
11
12
13
14 iI 16
17
S.;,:_:.,;
I.
1..c.n't knc:i
..,
1.:.'t
'
'14=
!")
:1-..
fl::.
t.;r:ir.ri and r&vis4vo to 1,2 dow!.
Cards arc neat ad unFnr.i in size.
-
'....1T-Lhinn t.;:i.,,.
chi-::cas of nroofslins or :.C's fcr LC cc..v.
to ;:rccess I-.ftrcnics trLc'. i.-Jainst
1u. 3".:
.s. for one 1.-i..en orcofslio, et.-
c.,1 "-....
.-.
;....,J Ln-,riL:. arc on t'.., ca..d.
Le Lezr::.sc i.c
t :' a:_ourt of t,..pin; ard revision tie necessary as a result.
sc-n
INSTITUTION
WHAT 00 YOU DISLIKE"MbIT ABOUT THE CATALOG SUPPORT SERVICES?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17.
18
19
20
._
Card appearance
Format of book number on label for book pocket and card is not acceptable
Call Uo. format; errors have to be corrected on all cards; excess of ext. cards
Occassional delays in receipt of cards; card format; MARC not inclusive enough
y
Time sorting books to tape; sorting books 10 wks, waiting; sending tape by mail; No. ofcardz_tp fe._ billing
Print out errors
Unable to request cards prior to.cataloging and receive them w/o call Nos_ so that theDeweTil could be added
.,
INSTITUTION
COULD YOU SEND MORE
REQUESTS TO NELINET?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
.
Yes - previous tie-in
with commercial processor
....-
Yes.- Budget limitations
.
.
Yes - Internal staff
resistance.
We intend to increase our
request volume inJuly.
Yes - budget
Yes - All items with LC
Nos. are sent
automatically. Those w/o are not,
because of the limited access
to tapes
No - unless received
without call numbers.
INSTITUTION
WHAT IMPROVEMENTS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE IN THE NELINET SYSTEM?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Improved card format; punched book cards
Format of book number; wider data base to include earlier imprints and items not in MARC
Speed -up whole process; call number to conform to ours
-.
Improve card and book pocket label format; author and/or title searching capability
Smaller type; billing simplified
Title access to tapes; standard error reporting form from us to you
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
FFECT ON STAFF JOB LOAD?
13
Yes
No
Yes
no
ttTA
Position
Yes
No
ow
uch
Position
No
No
no
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
,slight
1 fulltime rofessional
No
Yes
No
No
1.
Has NELINET had any effect on staff job load?
2.
Since beginning to use ALINET, has your staff increased?
.3.
Since beginning to use NELINET, has your staff decreased?
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
ARE ALL OF YOUR PROBLEMS GIVEN PROMPT ATTENTION BY INFORONICS OR NELINET STAFF?
12
3I
Yes
No
Yes
No
Describe
Yes
t..
_
N/A
.
\,
Yes
Yes
I am not always sure who I am supposed to talk with at Inforonics
-
Yes
Yes
Up to date list of people to contact
Yes
Yes
I wish we could get teletype messages through to you more readily
1.
Are all of your problems given prompt attention by Inforonics or HELMET staff?
2.
Have you any suggestions for improving communications?
.-3:--filease describe:
INSTITUTION
ARE THERE FORMAL STAFF MEETINGS ABOUT NELIFIET?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No, but informal meeting if problems arise
No
No
No
' INSTITUTION
HOW MANY STAFF MEMBERS ARE
IUVOLVED WITH NELINET?
1
Professional
Clerical
Typists
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17.
18
19
20
AVERAGE
2 42
74
52-1/2
4I
2.5
1
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13 14
15 16
17
18
19
20
ARE NELINET PRODUCTS OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
Yes
No
What changes would you like to see on them?
..
..
-Yes
Yes
Format of book number on book pocket and card
Yes
Size of type (smaller); call number format; series entry
format
.
Yes
Card format, book pocket lable (call number is hard to
read)
Reduce number of follow up cards
Yes
Smaller type (fewer second cards); different fonts
Yes
.I still wish there was a way to have the script I printed
in our call number
it)INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DO YOU USE ALL NELINET PRODUCTS?
Yes
.
i
No - pocket labels because of format of book numbers
..
No - we use only cards.
Selin labels come too late, pocket labels don't conform to our standard slash
Yes
Yes
Yes
.
Yes
.
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
YOU RETURN PRODUCTS TO N
INET?
No - no reason as yet
No
No - It is easier to change or fix ourselves than to tell you
Yes - Cards with errors are returned
Yes - If errors are UELINET - (call number, etc.)
Yes - Mistakes on cards
Yes - Errors on cards (typographical, omissions
etc.)
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DO YOU CHANGE THE NELIULT MACHINE FILE WHEN YOU MANUALLY CHANGE A NELINET
SHELF LIST CARD?
.
_
No - Have changed no shelf list card
No
-----
,.
.
No
We have no changes because of the strict criteria that I used in the beginning
No - Ignorance
Ho
-,
No - Lack of staff
Ho - When a class # is changed it is usually done to resolve a conflict
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 J2 13 14 15 16 .17 18 19 20
CAN YOU THINK OF ANY OTHER
CATALOGING SUPPORT PRODUCTS,
ETC.?
Yes - We would like a
lunched shelf list card and apunched book card similar tothose we use now
.
Yes - Book card to match
book pocket in acceptable
format
No
No No.
No
No
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DO YOU KEEP TRACK OF NELINET EXPENDITURES?
1,
.
.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Have received none
No
No
N/A
N/A
.
.
Yes
No
Ycs
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes.
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
1.
Do you keep track of NELINET expenditures?
2.
Do you have a NELINET budget?
3.
If yes, do yoe separate assessment and product costs?
'4.
.Do you check all NELINET bills?
5.
Do you have.any billing problems?
6.
If yes, please describe:
7.
Can you suggest changes in the billing systeniT
8.
Please describe:
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
-11 12
13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20,
DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW THE
NELINET SYSTEP,WORKS TECHNICALLY?
12
yes
yes
yes
yes
no no
no
yes
yes
VC
S
1.
Do you understand how the
NELIHET system works technically?
2.
If no
would you like a staff seminar'on
the subject?
INSTITUTION 1
NON-ENGLISH LC CARD NUMBER SEARCHING
2 3 4 5No
6 7 8No
9
10
11 12
13
14 15
No
.16
No
17
no
18
Yes - N:tional Union Catalog
19
No
20
1.
When the LC card number is not on a
current English language item,
do you look for it elsewhere?
2.
If yes, where do you look (in
order)?
Oj 1-10 1-11u-c;?-2 PinOT.;U.:I '7_,
1.71 't
;
2:::..;:3.1 1;30'.1:0 :.-...., L i4;:'',. 1 s.:,r, 0'1
_I
I
.
. . .
i
I
DU OU
I
.
.
.
I I
I
I
I
.
i
1
I
zI 7
, L
.1 :-.V.2 3!!1 :.J SISAW..1:1 ..:AAIT.11 ....) C(..;Z:7-..: S:7:71 N.
C
rl
Li91
El
LE
01.
6
L
9
z
I.
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
00
9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16-
17
18
19
20
HOW MANY REQUESTS DO YOU USUALLY HAVE AT NELINETAT ANY ONE TIME (NEW k_OLD)?
(Data sample too small)
275
170
184
2,000
75
INS
TIT
UT
ION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WHAT STATISTICS DO YOU
NTAIN )BOUT
NET's P
111
Percent requests filled; time elapsed before request is filled
None
Number of requests sent; filled; purged in 10 weeks,
purged by us before 10 weeks
Number of sets ordered, number of sets received
INSTITUTIONS
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS PREFERENCE
2 3 5 7 3 9
10
11 12
i3
14
15,
16
17 2i
.
I
.
I
z:
iE
';
7I
23
10
11
12
ii
114
5i
1C
17
1
.
1 I
I
,1
I
i
II
i 1
.
I1
i 1I
I
I
1
,E
2C
114
111
:1
1:
110
5:
78
15
I1C
3!
12
12
1._
I
1.
I 1.
1 1
1 ,
1
, .
:1
N1
1I
I1
1
.i 1
i
1I
i1
-I
'I
11
L
.
12
:'
11
110
I2
!13
I3
;4
1C
I9
714
1C
i:7
111
iiC
..
II
I
1
11
1'
.1
12
47 .
13
'I
7.)
1
,
11
6
1
,:
2.
21
1I
21-_,
:!
:1
72
FJ:.,ALLL f,YSTL'! :JCVLLU:11::.I:., TO TFL C/17::127. ::,OF327 SULLYS7L:1
C:11.01 OF PREFECE:
1.
111:
przs..Jcts in the exisi tnq Latr!-.ed syst-r. by cd:n entry only
in t.2 e.7 :;c:cred syst.1:- sy title cnly
r;rodscts in u. eistin
Ly .,ein entry and title
tc r.Ott
proL.uctS in ti:e exisitr.0 tatored system Ly series
tr,
datritics
C.
C.
i1ti:,rn
',cm!! catalor:s
7.
c.r%s, 1.e.. CO Zi .v.near as LC minted cards
.C.
.ut
1.nes. to the inch instead of t%2 currant G lines to the inc:1
9.
!,y LC
Ler
L:
11.
;C.
LC Liat.;ification r....:;tr to aid acnuisitions
12.
Iiiy Lc ;r,-surt
e.card sets so teat they arrive at your library in order for direct
'nto yoJr
12.
.5rater fL.i1I I ity in
t:.e.1:7:/ in 1A!ich ti,e call nort,er is printed on the catalog cards
14.
7_0
so p.r, Iccl rotes on C:2 catahr, cards
rLcuost Ly
nuAer
1.
L:.ocdinq of ren5csts for tile Latched syster
17.
'9.-.-1iLe anconir07, of bitlicgrephic records (i.e., non-ARC items) for the batched system
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9
10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17
18
19
20
S Y
IBRARY DISTBETWEEN SERIALS AND PERIODICALS
n B____
.
_A
Y6$
yes
yes
..
yeS
Yet
yes
04
A
ppriiidicals,i transactions & proceedings Are treated as one group, unclassified
yes
.Y,e no
yes
27.
We do not include pePiodicals as part of the definition of serials
no
Yks_
yet
yes
-:
.
.yes
yes
yes
no
i,
,We exclude periodicals from serials
tie treat annual serials as added copies of books, ordered through acquisitions
no
yes no
yes no
yes
no
We define o5 ppriodiclac came publicatins which appear irrpplarly
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
-no
yes
yes
..
yes
yes
A.
Coes your library distinguish between serials and periodicals?
B.
If YES, do you use given definition?
If NO, is definition given?
INSTITUTION
ACQUISITIOZ STATISTICS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Periodicals
Total Serials
1'2C,:2-69
19 9-70
1970-71
1971-72
1968-59
19694.0
1570-71
1971-72
175
368
505
800-1,000
1,242
1,264
1,345
1,400
1,936
1,964
2,077
2,150
2,357
2,600
2,700
2,800
unavailabl:
unavailable
4,600
4,900
800
900
1,000
250
380
300
500
6,841
7,000
9,025
9.400
1,128
878
978
1,000
2.550
2,857
3,285
3,300
1,200
1,500
9Q0
800
1,500
1,400
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
12,000
12,000
12,000
12,000
98
238
256
150
64
69
148
30
110
114
J67
30
1,987
2,071
386
2,164
607
2,200
422
600 est unavailable
456
unavailable
503
unavailable
525
274
2,700 es,'.
2,957
3,091
305
467
409
.
2,729 p
2,739 p
2,894 p
2,894 p
5,725 t
5,830 t
6,000 t
6,000 t
2,401
2,815
3,257
3,750
not kept
,
875
936
1,028
1,050
467
1469
I557
625
ppurchase
ttitles
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ssome
aapproximately
ARE SERIALS HANDLED BY A SPECIAL DEPARTMENTOR DIVISION?
A11
Cl
C9
.
yes
yes
4822
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
51,449
no
no
yes
yes
14
17,102
.
yes
yes
7?,575
yes
no
no no
yes
yes
.
no
no
.
yes
yes
4709
yes
yes-s
458
2119
yes
yes
41,880-a
yes
no
21.300
yes
yes
yes
v.-!s
4
A.
Are serials handled by a special serials department or division?
Li.
If YES, does the division also process serials for branches?
C.
If YES, 1.
How many branches?
2.
How many titles?
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17 18
19
20
ft?r
3/1
;CrST
__
N'.;MBFP
Clerical
Typists
Professional
AVERAGE SALARY
Clerical
.
-
Typists____
Professional
1.6
11,500
5,460
.5,460
22
8,066
4,742
1.60/hr
13
11,500
5,800
1/4
950
16,000
410
10,000
.6,409
38
10,000
5,000
1/2
10 hrs/wk
1/2
3,900
9,925*
480
5,100*
1,820
_.
14
1/2
21
13,500
6,500
5,500
14-1/2
5,160
14,914
1/2
1/2
2,756
200
12
7,100
3,744
12
6,000
4,nrin
4,108
13
9,800
26
17,682*
128,462*
12-1/2
8,480
3.972
1/2
1
* estimates
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12 13 14
15
16
17 18
19
20
SERIALS DEPARTMENT CUDC1ET
1968-69
1969-70
1070-71
1971-'72
-
...
64,827
129,469
174,249
5,329
11,666.
16,013
18,237
41,120
57,500
60,427
70,450
t21,000
6 721
7 300
95,610
..
106,094
46,595
61,920
74,140
75,000
44,00
50,500
64,708
68,4421
no date
p'
I
4,846
5,957
9,393
5,000
9,370
9,988
14,035
14,600
.
137,638
.
164,650
'
170,000
53,250
62,000
75,000
82,500
96,000
106,000
130,000
145,000
192,017
132,715
197,795
150,000
77,700
88,650
104,700
39,940
42,687
52,000
1
Periodical subscriptions only
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
USE OF JOBBERS
At: 1.1.,
ry
...,
UPrin
%Name
m-,
%
yes
Faxon
.40%
Eastern
3%
Abel
7%
.
-
yes
Franklin Sq.
28
Stevens & Brown
6%
Stechert
4%
yes
1Ebesco
30%
Stechert-Hafner
30%
Blancheteau
5%
Direct
20%
yes
Ebesco
95%
yes
Faxon
75%
15%
10%.
15%
yes
Faxon
30%
Harrosowitz
ILSA
Stevens
yes
.
yes
IFaxon
58%
Abel
10%
Bowker
2.6%
Direct
28.9%
yes
Faxon
Abel
2%
Direct
yes
Ebsco
60%
Swets
Direct
38%
yes
Faxon
20%
Harrassowitz
15%
25%
Stechert
15%
Iiijhoff
10%
yes
Franklin Sq.
50%
59%
Faxon
yes
yes
Faxon
baker-Taylor
8%
.
Faxon
80%
Harrosowitz
1%
Stechert-Hafneti
1%
yes
Faxon
35?
Swets
40?
Nijhoff
5?
yes
Lbsco
66%
40%
Blackwell
25%
4%
Stechert-Hafne
2%
Direct
11%
yes
Moore-Cottrell
Stevens & Brown
Stechert-Hafner
7%
Direct
46%
yes
Swets
10%
Stechert-Hafner
5%
Ancorp
45%
Direct
29%
yes
McGregor
14%
Harrassowitz
7%
Faxon
7%
Direct
63%
yes
Faxon
.33%
Western
25%
Direct
42%
A.
Do you use jobbers?
If YES, name them and their individual percentage
of titles acquired
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WHAT ARE YOUR MAJOR PROBLEM AREAS IN SERIALS ACQUISITIONS,
PRCCESSING AND COMOL?
Area
Arrl
firil
Jobbers
File maintenance
Communications - Agents
Control of classed serials
Claims
Control
Holdings
Delay in sub. initiation
Invoicing procedures
Card .roduction
Peculiarities of serials
Claims
U.S. jobbers
Slow LC cataloging
File maintenance
Entering new title
Claims and change of title
Claim
Invoices and bills paymentGovt. procurement proc.
File maintenance
Vendors
Uilling
Renewals
Claiming
Old issues
Claiming
Mixed responsibilities
Classification policy
Delay is sub. initiation
Claiming
MisSing iSSU2 awareness
Payment & receipt records
Purchasing system
Claims
In process control
Claims
Invoicing
Title changes
Claims
INSTITUTIM
2 3 S 6 7 9
10
12
13
14
20 4 8 16
17 18
IR
COMPUTER AIDS - SERIALS LOUT
AB
.
no no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
.
no
no
no
yes
Sarre as aenuisitions
yc..
,'$:.10q1Cai:;, serials and newsletters are .entered in
4ba7.rj consnrtiun serials union list'
the
tpriqn ,,,,C is rn
a','.
inrintout
,:rile
inJividm iibrary huidinns vary in frvouency Iroar
c.rithly un:at..S tn as introli.ent 4S des red.
PAC uses a qvart,:rly printout.
..1.uf.:-....-
L..; rc.vid:,..tor_official_lcrr,:.DLILW..ry. hollinqsle:ation.....sotic:e.A.=...-CatalOq
1:,..,Lec. indi4idudl-title ICentiiication nur:ber, hardcupy ur Journal. and Lu.!.-refurvoLui.
no
Ozve a prl;ra..:
fora scrialS
list.
1.ohey to
wole,...Lnr...
have a bu;.onth y
prin
tout
or
..1...a14.S._u:s:;ttr.--zurL11a.se_.:.,J-_La.1S
n0kalS COip-inn the univvrsity crpuse'
iincl
la:, 'cil'ull
Uric
...P.4
, tl
r,ffql
.4-
rn
fft,, wary., tihfeh also IhcIu..,,s (Add ttfleS.
ExpLc.C!J freqUency of
update is every two years.
no
CIfTM: Ordering SySy;m used.
Systen.designed for a nop-reppat order so may eliminate only 2
ct our
ti Il
es.
IL ac.dS a
co'.i
nle
matiens to eur.vork, uut the un-to-date accounting.intomaation,
tw.: sist:- prOVIUQS. :pre Ulan CO::;101S1tCS.fOr theadditional work.
142 pi-educe a canputerned
SeridiS 11St.
It
vas
Lwpio as a puriouicalS
I iSt._ve are rb.a adding serials.
Progre 4 W111 ..-
(;.,
-itta to net infortion of titles b/ vendor, eenerill subject category and possibly
bindinc,
ifilorration._ A proqram nas been written to.iist_iitles by the .deparu:ent..purcnasing. the41.,
beparb-ents are now using these to review their subscriptions. --TRITT-hation
Referr.nce Cepartmeni.produces a punched cardholdings list.
iToapplierEY-Kel-farir
c:!partrert 10r,the
ISt,___
m.,: rufuroce Ludr
Int nave em,piled a Computer printout of periodical holdings. ..Arrunned loy
title.. ':21din2;_read "To date" for current subscriptions.
Additions to list cone Trom scriais
cataloger
A.
Is existing system computer aided?
B.
If YES. is description attached?
02-4S 05eJOAP 1e201.
'n
saki JO JatiCfra jr10 y
NZZ
NEL
8
xpt,
9
78Z
171
;i61
El
Zt
nZ
J
CU
N9'17l
8
all
.
N5l
9
NE
8
4t9
ti
N99
IL
Nl
Z
NCZ
Z
nt
9E.
7115
'v
--.--.---
--------
C171
enWTs:nC
.2.77rInC-Z11
'.:,,,r-11.4
*
OZ6i
fat
Ll
9t
St
t71.
El
ZlEt
Ot6SL9S1
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13.
14
15
16
17 18
19
20
P.
BC
DF
::o./Av:!. Sal:!ry
No.
A7e. !glary
No./Ave,
5alary ----------,
N.. Ave. Salary
':c1/Ave. 5111ary
1512,000
48,000
27 -30
90-105/wk
7-2
$90-$105/wk
.
57,148
70
1.60/hr
19,975
74,253
13.296
14,900
1/2
1 60;hr
15
1.60/hr
1-1/2
1.60/hr
16,000
13,000
38,725
21
5,400
15
4,160
10
rence
5,100
and public service
24
-
18.00/k
'-su-wics
'..5ibb hr7wk
1 60/hr
IncLded in ref
29,300
8-1/)
85,000
6,600
1/2
2,800
13 700
16
5,800
24,450
16
4,160
4 sp
5,619
35 1
25.00/wk
730
13,513
.2
300
16 sr.
5,900
1/2
2,340
.3
2,25/hr
3-1/2
1.80/hr
85
37,000
11
70.42/wk
561.60/wk
111,000
13
3,900
1/2
1,950
80
18
1.70/hr stu
1.75/hr
405
18
1,70/hr stude
1.75/hr
37,800
34,700
55,x-12
3
1/2
4.245
31,735
51.60/hr
11.60/hr
1
A.
Prcf
U.
Cler'c:1
C.
Yypi_ts
D.
File..s
E.
Silel..-ers
INSTITUTION
1V4; GRO:PS CF M4TER!. ;.S nn NC
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Periodicals
Reserves
Theses (1st copy)
Periodicals & Govt. Docs.
Reference
Reference
Microform
Spec. collections
Reference
Microform'
Newspapers
Theses
Records
Current periodicals
Reference
Current periodicals
Reference
.
Special collections
Reference
Law sets
Bound periodicals
Reference
Periodicals
Reserves
Spec. collections
Reference
Government documents
Periodicals
Reference
Bound periodicals
Microform
Reserves
Some periodicals
Some Government documents
Spec. collections
Reference
Microforms
Periodicals
Reference
Current periodicals
Spec. collections
Archive
Current periodicals
Microtext
Periodicals
, .
Microforms
.
Government documents
Spec. collections
Reference
Periodicals
Special collections
Microform
Reference
Special collections
U.S. serials set
Reference
College catalogs
Documents
Legal materials
Special collections
Periodicals
Reference
...,Periodicals
Records
Maps
INSTITUTION
OP
EN
OR
CLO
SE
D S
TA
CK
S?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
Open Stacks
cr Clc:;--d
If cincod. 44-tc I; porrit,-.f! Arre,I,
Closed
Staff, faculty, graduates and
special undergraduates
Open
Open
Open
st
Open
.;pen
\.
Open
Open
Open
1Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open-
INSTIT11110,1
LONTLiTS Jr CIRCULATIw
CNTROL FILES
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
1;;.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1-
2._
c.
7
1 1R
I 1______g
.
vg
1, .
3.
I
1 1
1 1 1
yes
no
no
yes
yes
yes
|yes
1no
1yes
yes
.yes
. __ _ ____
yes
_ .... _
yes
___
__
yes
yes
__
_.
no
_____ _____
yes no
_ _ ______
yes
___ _ . __ __
yes_ _
no
yes
________. ___
yes
____ . ____
yes
no
yes
____. _____
yes _
yes
1
no___
no
yes
______
.
1yes
_____ _ ____
I
no
_
no
yes
yes
_ _ ___
yes
yes
_YeS
yes
_____ _
yes
___
______
1 : $ , 1 1
yes
yes
no
---
___ __
yes
____
._ _
_Yes
___
yes
yes
_Y.e51._
Yes
___
.__
yes
______ _
no
. ____
|
yes
yes'
yes
1
Ye.s
___
yes
yes
yes
_ _____
yes
1__
_
1 1yes
____yeS
yes
yeS
__ ___ _ no
yes
Yes
yes
____
1no
!yes
yes
_ . _____
no
|
____yes . _
yes
yes
11
1yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
'
I
no
fno.
!
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
.
yes
yes
1 1
yes
yes
. 1 1
l 11
yes
_yes
.
yes
1 1yes
yes
jyt.:'_.
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
jyes
yes
yes
no
yes
1yes
yes
1no
1
yes
1yes
Jno
yes
-yes
no
no
1yes
|yes
yes
r---
no
2,1,:s
.1 ___ _____
no
_l__
yes
ye;
|yes
yes
1yes
yes
.
no
yes
yes
no
___ ro
no
yes
_yes
ye'S
1 1
Yes
LYes
f 1
.
no
no
yes
no
____
,
yeS
1_____
1
yes
1
yes
yes
yes
1 1
yes_
Yes
t
_yes
yes
1
.;
yes
Y's
yes
Yes
1yes
i
no
iYes
Yes
iyes
yes
yes
Ino
1Yes
|no
1no
yes
yes
Yes
,yes
yes
1
yes
1
yes no
1
yes
yes
yes no
1 !
.
no
yes
no
yes
yes
1Yes
Lno
no
Does your ci rcu l a ti on
sys tem i nc 1 ude
the fo 1 1 cwi ng:
1.
Ef_ri,]s?
6.
rcserve?
2.
?i:rioc;ca1s?
7.
i-;1 ss ro
tems ?
3.
12:.LJL:
periodicals?
C.
Lrarcn:..'s - or dcTt. libs?
4.
1.1...I.?
9.
(.:rr,.211s?
L .
t erls
10.
Hol ds and ;:a ti no bort-ewers?
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Only partial figure
DO YOU KEEP A STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CIRCULATION FIGURES?
1968-1969
A1
23
45
67
89
10
yes
137,000
none
11,171
yes
39,295
5,568
1,373
5,897
600
265
900
yes
75,500
6,930
8,200
yes
851727
2,000
1,0L3
nfa
yes
57.7291
13,718
.1,730
28.618
108
3,500
10,327
yes
04,917
18,035
24,093
11,000
no
47,766
4
not kept
lot kepinot
kept 351
L:45
no
yt.
yes
106,151
112,063
35,233
Ve'..
£6,470
4,796
3,667
461
12,002
yes
5,012
1,007
G71
69
yes
610,76
3,8.95
14,135
I
'04
5,694
6,231
10,371
2,348
3,341
3.1..:.7
13.959
yes
56,015
I
41,807
no
130,94 .,.
yes
177,306
5,300
1,762
30,000
862
4,716
yes
48,069
26,137
11,848
3,629
1,893
4,224,
yes
54,672
17.078
7,545
36,815
no
12,420
552
A.
Do you keep a statistical
breakdown of your circulation figures?
If YES, please give for:
1.
Undergrad. circ.
6.
No.
2.
Graduate Circ.
7.
No.
3.
Faculty circ.
8.
No.
4.
Staff circ.
9.
No.
5.
"Other" circ.
10.
No.
vols on resv.
Vols held for borrowers
overdue notices
vols lost
vols sent to bindery
INSTITUTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Only partial figure
DO YOU KEEP A STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CIRCULATION FIGURES?
1968-1969
A1
23
45
67
89
10
yes
155,000
23,06v -
z5,w0
7,:775
yes
37,733
5,412
1,309
5,598
600
n/A
280
1,361
yes
62,000
6,200
7,103
yes
-
70,722
2,000
1,390
yes
yes
62,3901
16,077
.1,247
35,447
1,089
4,250
11,1`94
yes
62,363
19,093
23,439
11,000
not kept
1,852
j.ot kep
7,865
not kep;
259
no
49,941
404
1,411
ro
yes
40,132
2,254
442
ves
116..915
124,717
34,909
ye'.
C6.697
5,637
3,811
415
14,501
yes
7.3;3
1,446
2C2
yes
57,493
4,147
1,321
7,733
2,750
3,269
4,077
yes
62,555
56,251
16,873
7,570
9,401
17,105
no
147,1:4
yes
212,616
5,900
1,747
38,000
796
8 024
yes
49,629
28,358
10,727
3,465
10,200
3,024
yes
65563
17.218
8,399
31,517
no
15,132
603
A.
Do you keep a statistical breakdown of your circulation figures?
If YES, please give for:
1.
Undergrad. circ.
6.
' No.
2.
Graduate circ.
7.
No.
3.
Faculty circ.
8.
No.
4.
Staff circ.
9.
No.
5.
"Other" circ.
10.
No.
vols on resr.
Vols held for borrowers
overdue notices
vols lost
vols sent to bindery
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
00 YOU KEEP A STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CIRCULATION FIGURES?
1970-1971
10
,....-
yes
180,000
28,000
6,500
600
12,000
1A8
310
f4,648
L10,
yes
3'4,850,
6,393
1,307
4,739
yes
65,200
6,800
9,000
yeS
2,000
2,C30
1,600
1,6.00
yes
4,103
794
2,230
yes
112,6391
14,231
.1,903
41,421
1,228
5,605
10,115
yes
73,623
18,912
17,983
11,000
3,080
3,462
no
68,640
not kept
eat kept
P..555
76E
yes
38,770
l12,043
l8,621
60,000
L 1,623
2.941
2,350
1,150
1,425
1,1G0
2.000
50
2,150
yes
yes
131,212
117,943
33,845
yeS
79,525
5,530
4,381
582
14,006
yes
7.405
1,585
1,100
195
yes
69,121
4,330
1,727
9,148
2,472
4,197
4,863
yes
8,000
82,000
17,900
i.'
12,000
11,596
119,106
no
164 593
ves
237,624
6,500
2,089
27,000
639
10,057
yes
72.078
39,534
13,302
1i
6,284
10,880
,yesno
19,156
821
2,000
Only partial figure
A.
Do you keep a statistical breakdown of your circulation figures?
If YES, please give for:
I.
Undergrad. circ.
6.
110. vols on resr.
2.
Graduate dim.
7.
No. Vols held for borrowers
3.
Faculty circ.
8.
No. overdue notices
4.
Staff circ.
9.
No. vols lost
5.
"Other" circ.
10.
No. vols sent to bindery
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DO YOU KEEP A STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CIRCULATION FIGURES?
1971-1972
A1
23
45
67
89
10
210,000
28,600
7,500
15,500
44,050
7 000
6,000
650
400
1,925
67,000
6,500
9,000
70,000
2,000
1,300
19 50C
not kept
lot kept
10,000
fj
60,000
500
2,000
2,150
145,000
120,000
35,000
7,6.50
1,750
1,148
270
73,5)0
4,500
2,000
8,900
2,500
3,500
4,500
155,000
100,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
19,500
183,000
10,200
75,000
42,000
15,000
7,000
11,000
I
A.
Do you keep a statistical breakdown of your circulation figures?
If YES, please give for:
1.
Undergrad. circ.
6.
No.
2.
Graduate circ.
7.
No.
3.
Faculty circ.
8.
No.
4.
Staff circ.
9.
No.
5.
"Other" circ.
10.
No.
vols on resr.
Vols held for borrowers
overdue notices
vols lost
vols sent to bindery
INSTITUT-ION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14 15
16
17
13
19
20
7
5 weeks (including pre- and post-processing)
5 weeks (including pre- and
post-processing)
5-G weeks
5 weeks
4 weeks
3 -4 'weeks
..
.
4-C weeks
.
G w...1:1
2-3 .:seeks
G wce;.s
2 ,.:ays - 2 years
.
I1..wah
6 wt.-0.s
2 ,.oath,
G-n wc,.ks
4ceks
4 weeks (at bindery)
3-4 t.eeks (at bindery)
8 weeks
(at bindery)
.
INSTITUTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WHAT IS THE AVERAGE TIME FOR RECEIPT OF AI'
ILL REQUEST TO GETTING MATERIAL IN THE MAIL?
4
1-2
7:10
yes
photocopy
10d per page - varying charges for microfilm
29
no
Photocony
photocopy
10d per pane
24 hrs.
11.5
no
15
yes no
[photocopy
a a; no ry-
ouest rec d
n/a
1-2
no
16
yes
photocopy
(10d per page if more than 10)
--
3-4
4no
28
no
110
no
10
yes
photocopy
(15d per page if more than 6)
110
no
ZIC
yes
postage
plus xeroxing
12
n/filo cAqv
nO
14
yes
photocopy
10C /page
6-10
10.5
yes
photocopy
10d /page if 10 or more panes are copied
1-
1 -i /2
8yes
photocopy
10c /after first 10 pages
27-3
yes
photocopy
10d /Page if 10 or more pages are copied
'
110
no
1.
What is the average time from receipt of an ILL. request to getting material in the mail?
2.
What is the average No. of pages of photocopies sent in
response to an I.L.L. request?
3.
Do you charge other libraries for I.L.L.?
4.
If YES, what charge?
INSTITUTION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1968-19F,9
101,0-1n7.0
1970-1971
Photo
Orininal
Total
Photo
Orininal
Total
Photo
jOrininal
Total
not available
423
1,368
1,791
852
106
958
1,086
416
1,502
1,737
488
2,225
717
717
230
443
673
319
540
859
186
184
2,774
-
2,774
2,724
2,724
3,314
3,314
1,318
1,695
3,013
879
1,701
2,520
1,092
2,008
3,100
142
142
206
'
206
124
294
294
36
141
i177
314
17
451
55
1.735
2,724
4,509'
2,073
2,793
4,866
2,325
2,412
4,737
CO
290
370
/1
309
33U
,-
83
264
347
93
326
419
180
300
40
1;731
994
2,275
1619
1222
1,427
2,241
2,847
2,030
2,006
4,036
643
1,237
1,930
1,420
1,934
995
2,929
2,092
1,213
3,305
2,222
1,206
3,428
474
474
1,403
727
2,113
6,243
1,025
7,873
351
953
1,309
707
912
1,625
653
940
1,553
125
104
229
175
113
288
83
163
251
1
INSTITUTION I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WHAT ARE THE MAIN INSTITUTIONS TO WHICH YOU LEND ITEMS ON ILL AND WHAT PERCENTAGE OF
YOUR LOANS U0 THEY COVER?
XInstitution
%1Institution.
1%
1Institution
1Institution
XInstitution
1I
WCR
33
Stanford U
3.3
1BU tied Sch
3.3
MIT
3.3
Tufts U
2.37
Wesleyan U
23
U Conn
18
Hartford Sem
11.5
Trinity Col
Hartford Sem
6
GO
Inip
Col
U Conn
GO
Conn Col
GO
Conn State Li
30
bates Col
15
1;odoin Col
15
IU Maine
15
Me State Lib
15
n/a
Harvard U
10
Tvco
.10
Raytheon
:di State Lib
17
UHII
7U Vermont
3U Maine
2U (lass
.
Hii Pub Lib
80
,o1 Lul
U councilaml
10
-
UUH
31
Other Coll &
i.a Vj .,]...er;:an77----
r;
,n :)vs
30
Air Force Aca
20
uS Mil Acad
20
Army Mar Col
2 -1/2
MIT
20 1
ava
n er-
V1 P
nisp.
it,; Hotnital
11 -1/2
URI
3U Mass
i
Tufts ::cd Sch
34
Hasson Col
7MU
61
UU
5MIT
i
Me State Lib
10
Bates Col
51 Colby Col
5bowdoin
41 U Maine-Port
Ply :,fate Col
29
illi State Lib
17
ME Col
4.5
Keene State C
4.5
U Maine
4
Prov Pub Lib
6-LO
U Maine
3pvii4cilratcr2
U Cunn
2
Vt State Cols
50
Vt Dept of t.i
20
MC State U
20
Other
10
Clark U
30
Holy Cross
10
1
What are the wain institutions to which
you lend-items on I.L.L. and what percentage of your loans
do they cover?
INS
TIT
UT
ION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WHAT IS THE AVERAGE TIME YOU MUST WAIT TO GET ILL ITEMS FROM OTHER LIBRARIES,
BEGINNING AT
THE POINT OF USER REQUEST AND ENDING WITH NOTIFICATION OF RECEIPT OF ITEM TO USER - DAYS?
A 7 days
10 days
2-3 days
7:IP circuit - 1-3 weeks mailed reouests
3 days
2-5 days
22 days
14
f.)-7 days
12
2-3 weeks
14 3 weeks
7 days
7 days
C days
14 days
30# days
2-3 i..ccks
21 days
14 days
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9
f-t
10 11
n.)
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
FR
OM
nT
HF
R L
IBR
AR
IES
?-
---____ _
196;:-1969
._. _. .....
___.
1969-1970
1970-1971
Photo
Original
Total
Photo
Original
Total
Photo
Original
Total
658
1,074
414
334
748
3,136
444
3,530
4,010
504
4,514
3,707
480
4,127
231
231
207
329
536
424
546
970
485
664
246
921
1,187
848
1,650
1,858
823
1,537
.
2,380
207
600
887
336
658
994
418
743
;
1,1E4
1,640
1,640
1,122
1,122
nhotiilanes
732
1,357
489
',37
1,221
15
153
163
,-
4:-,
165
210
525
1,227
1,752
7:6
1,376
2,101
62',';
1,179
1,833
123
176
.299
137
182
319--
22
35
82
29
-
.5i
.'.
147
263
410
131
227
358
130
247
377
1,070
1,126
2,196
1,097
1,283
2,330
1,485
1,490
2,975
1,720
1,710
3,430
2,403
2,321
4,724
1,218
638
1,856
1,466
1,057
638
2,523
638
1,338
7,017
1,056
726
2,294
7 743
1,091
1,091
891
363
623
986
526
506
1,032
382
146
528
401
168
569
399
463
862
WHICH ARE THE MAIN INSTITUTIONS FROM WHICH YOU BORROW ON ILL AND WHAT PERCENTAGE OF YOUR
INSTITUTION
ILL BORROWING DO THEY CGVER?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9
10
11 12
13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
I
Institution
%Institution
%Institution
%
Harvard U
13.3
GU I.:ed Sch
6.5
Spfld Col
6.5
Yale U
41
Wesleyan U
20
U Conn
10
4
Y3- C U
37
U Conn
16
Conn Col
13
U ::aine
30
ecwdoin Col
25
t:e State Lib
Erit-h Col
15
20
rx::lurSt Col
25
U Mass
30
Countway Lib
15
Widner Lib
3LC
6
NH State Lib
BHarvard U
7Yale U
6
U;:ii
85
HH State Lib
10
Other
5
Counti/Jy Lib
12
Harvard U
7MIT
4
Urulm U
50
/Harvard U
!Harvard U
30 15
HIT
Yale U
20
11
Covntway Lib
15
.----,
RI Insts
34
Prov Pub Lib
27
Harvard U
22
HIT
6Wellesley Col
4
Yale U
25
LC
30
Harvard fled
20
Local (Maine)
40
Dartalouth Col
13
U Vemont
5.3
Woods Hole
4.0
35
Ke'ir;.
lil_State
,laivacaitips2,9_
Harvard U
25
20
Utlit
10
'2""1"
Dartmouth Col
20
40
MIT
i Clark U
_20
Which are the main institutions from which you borrow on I.L.L. and what percentage
of your
I.L.L. borrowing do they cover.
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DO YOU CHARGE USERS
FOR ILLs DONE FOR THEM?
Aa
no
no
.
no no
no
yes
cost
yes
xerox over 55.00
os
xerox over 55.00
no
no
no no
no
yes
xerox
no
yes
photocopy (10S/pane)
yes
$10.00 on any item, anything over 510,00, the patron pays the amount over
yes
whatever the lending institution charges us
no
no
A.
Do you charge users for I.L.L.s done for them?
B.
If YES, what charge?
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DESCRIBE HOW ILL FITS INTO YOUR LIBRARY ORGAUIZATIOU.
Profncsinnals
1Clericals
No.
Typists
Average Salary
No.
Averane Salary
F:.--1-
Average Salary
1
1 1
1 -1/2
56,200
1x
159,000
.067
515
x
19,975
(Circ. Lill
15,725
x
1/3
1,700
I
g
1/5
1,700
1/3
1.60/hr
x
!
3/5
5,700
3/5
3,300
.
18,500
1/2
3,400
x
11/2
1/2
x
1/2
1/2
I/5
1,980
x
1/2
4,125
11/20
300
27,312
15,800
57 hrs., 1.95/hr
18,50
11/2
2,160
1/2
2,100
x
14,6C0
/2/8
1,500
11
x
1/2
4,500
14,835
11/3
2,051 (L:ail
r"
18,500
i
.A.
Please describe how I.L.L. fits into your library organization:
1.
Independant
2.
Part of circulation
3.
Part of reference
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
H10
H F.
11
rn
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CIPCULATIC:! AND INTERLIBRARY LOAN CO:rTROL
R____C_I
D
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
SS number
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
SS number
yes
yes
no
no
yes
_yes no
_yes
no
i Lorrower No. given by ID photo service
yes
Institutional ID number
yes
yes
yes
yes
SS number
yes
yes
ISS number
SS number
yes
yes
..
S!, nunLer
yes
Number for undcrgrad.Jgrad. - no # staff/faculty_yes
_yes
yes
SS number - institutional ID number
no
yes
SS number
yes
no
SS number
yes
yes
yes
SS number
A.
Is an identification number for borrowers used?
B.
If YES,
C.
Is a 113rrers card used?
.D.
If YES, please describe.
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13 14
15
16
17
18 19
20
CtRCU1ATT9N AND INTERLI RAPY !PAN C
AI
B
no
no
no
-
no
no
,---Punched cards in book; contains a/t/call number/accession number.
Borrower writes name, address, ID number, status, on card; then
no
r
no
keypunched.
When books are returned, new book card is punched.
IBM
Keypunch machines #029 card punch
$4,500 annual
5375
Keypunch personnel salaries
3,600
"300
Computer time - no charge to lib.
Circulation personnel salaries
4,470
"370
.Circulation card drawers
.---
IBM
Card sorter #082
81
"6.75
,....IBM
Collator eou
72
"6
monthly
_no
.
yes
yes
.<
.
no
.h
no
.
no
1
.r
fI
no.
;
no
I
no
1
no
no
no
1
no
!
no
i
A.
Do you have an a;Itom.ilad circulation system?
0.
Is dc:scriotion given (yes - no)
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CIRCULATNI 1A0.ViTERL18RRRY LOAN CONTR3L
i L._
B
1 12 part form - color coded
*Farrington charge
1,500
170
Charge card
McBee
Demco
1,905
1 iCharge card
Demco imprint
160 (rental)
1Bro-Dart Sysdac
180 (rental)
ICharge card
1 Newark-embossed card
1Sysdac
.
180 (rental)
.Punched card
i2 card
i
n/a
McBee
Demco imprint
600 (machine)
1 McBee
Addressograph
918
McBee
Addressograph
160
ICharge card
Addressograph
McBee
Simplex date machine
I One card - color coded
Gaylord Model"400
855
.
1 McBee - Keysort
I
1 McBee card - ?
7 other misc
460
I Charge card
3,015
i McBee - Keysort
13,523
2 part form ?
1Gaylord Model C
57
A. It kind of circulation system do you have?
U.
C.:14egiAqdischarging.equipment - name?
C.
A:mu-31 cost of materials for circulation?
INSTITUTION
CPCNLATICN AND INTCPLMARY LOAN CO:4TROL
2 3 4 5 6 8 9H H
10 11 12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
AB
rein
.re
.7..
.
31
7
21
3
11
2
21
1
11
2
61
3
21
11
21
3
.2
12
11
3
21
4-
11
2..I I
41
5
1peak 5
slow_3 1
peak 7
slow_5---
1 61
1
11
2
J____ 3
24
13-1/2
A.
Now r...any circulation points do you have in main lihrary?
B.
No.:, w.ny personnel at each point?
INSTITUTION
TOTAL ANNUAL CIRCULATION BUDGET
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
l'./6/1:-1(259
191.9-1970
1970-1971
n71-1972
n/a
289,783.89
300,000
309,610
42,535
41,544
42,566
42,507
26,100
28,700
35,800
41,500
34,340
42,340
38,440
11,485
18,000
35,900
'
39,500
43.400
44,500
37,800
)39,700
143,400
I45,900
No separate budget
69,000
175,000
!87,000
I87,000
n/a.
1
1n/a
I
n/a
1
6.900
7,400
7,750
18,113
52,696
56,821
69,931
171,500
7s,000
190,000
120,000
1125.000
84,900
96,034.20
105,280.20
1110,000
'
38,538.64
42,000
45,000
51,300
50,800
65,400
71,000
!71,000
38,556
46,714
1
87,421
60,000
i'
1
98,992
65,000
49.310
52,000
INSTITUTION
MAJOR PROJECT AREAS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Periodicals control; fines - overdues; ILL
citation verification; withdrawal & replacement of stack (closed
&at.
Location & retrieval of improperly charged item; like maintenance, accuracy
Unauthorized removal; filing accuracy; bks mischelved; recalcitrant borrowers
Inaccuracy; image
Ovedues; circulation of equipment - sualy - demand exessive
inadequate equipment; antiquated procedures; US Post Office - inaccurate bibl. citations
._
.
End of term borrowing; stack space
Typing overdues; inaccurate filing; incorrect shelving; cnecking "claimed returned" books
_ID verification; disappearance of borrowers
__
Overcrowded stacks; lack of control of reserve material
___._
Human error; lack of manpower; file maintenance; shelving
Simpler system needed; manpower
Handwriting; borrower card
Uverdues; file maintenance; botrvwer list preparation
Ho machine assistance; filing control_- training; records retention period - 7 years
Overdue procedures; recalcitrant'
reserve services
Filing;
Lack of permanent staff; response to recall notices; inefficient charging system
Human error
Overducs
INST
ITU
TIO
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WH
AT
IS YOUR FINE STRUCTURE?
15d/day, maximum $5.00; reserves - 51.00/hr; maximum $65.00
No fine structure - billed for book after "reasonable" time
10t/day, maximum $7.00; $20.00 replacement of book
.
Only fine for reserve
None
10t/day, maximum $10.00; reserve 25t/hr
..
5t/day; 50t/day (24 hr books); 25C/hr (2 hr books)
5t/day; reserve 25d for 1st hr, 5d each additional hour
10C /day
None
10c/day; cost book - cost plus $5.00 for cataloging
5d/day - $2.00 maximum; reserves 25t/hr - $5.00 maximum
5t/day Der overdue item up to the cost of the item
5t - 10c/day; reserves 15C/half hour - $3.00/day
5d/ay; reserve 25t/hr, maximum $1.00
After 2 weeks overdue 52.00, $1.00 for each additiOnal week, maximum $10.00
;lo fines
5c/day; reserves (open) 25d/day; reserves (closed) 25G /hr; Non- returned = cost plu.; 55.00 processing
b days after overdue notice.
Bill sent for $10.00 plus 510.00 for each book (to acct. ofc) Reserves - 51/hr
5d/day up to cost of book.
Reserves 50G for 1st hr, 25C each additional hour
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 19 20
OW MUCH STAFF TIME IS CONSUMED PER MONTH BY:
Overf!tics
Filinn
511,-.:Ivinn
520-550
650-700
3100-3500
660-700 (paging:
C.S".1.
8 hrs, 20,-25 hrs (billing)
56
84-90
24
40
140
250
20
15
80
-
333
316
1221
.
60
120
300
32
120
640
100
25
490
none
65
40
128
600
400'
100
24
10'
-
20
25
IA20
195
80
350
T
300
550
716
12
180
405
.
230
i290
360
72
i
100
360
00
1
33
95
(Time in !.curs per mon00
* C.S. (Closed Stacks)
INSTITUTION
BIL
LIN
G F
OR
FIN
ES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
I
ADescription
..
yes
Circ. charges - fines desk to acctg. to bursar's office for billisig - T.L.L. - no
Some
,ibrary bil15 dircctly - clPtinsurnrcIurnpd river to Regis.,==r_faLficz
Circ. libn. notifies treasures office - students, billine from library to faculty & non-inst.
Yes
Some
borrowers.
Informal procedures - seniors
no
yes
Accounting office used for follolimLip nrocoduro
no
no
yes
Students billed by library. 113.1:Mcnt collected by bursar
faculty_ headed by director
yes
Punched cards to controller, billing to students account
no
no
I
no
I
yes
i:otify
accti:. office but try to collect at circ. desk
Some
1
Ten week overdue notification son; to 1211i11055_12.f.a.
yes
t NI university personnel billed from bursar's office, others billed directly from library
yes
ko description
1...
no
A.
Is your billing done thru the institutions accounting office?
B.
If YES, please describe.
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16.
17
18
19
20
......---....-..
--........--
...-.....
p
8133K
424K
631K
414K
38K
53 9
33K
24+
- -
21
69
15 4
t
6r
16K
J11 9
37K
10
45K
826K
336K
822K
A3-1/2K
A.
Total nu::.ber of files used.
B.
Total average size.
INSTITUTIO3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17 la 19
20
REFCRCNCE:
STAFF
Professioaals
Clerical
Typists
Filers
Shelvcrs
Ito.
Ave. Salary
1;o.
Ave. Salary
1:o.
hve. Salary
lo.
Ave. Salary
R.
'kve. Salary
710,600
2 at 5 400
Provided by
Cir, Gil/.
18,400
1/4
51.60/hr
Mo'Ji6Yr
1/4 1.60 hr
411,207
11
5,000
1.3
9,900
13,900
211,003
25,200
24
9,804
35
5,855
25
.52.00/hr
610,250
24,750
2518.50/wk
'
2.5
8,5Z.:0
1at 3,793
5 hrs/30 weeks at 51,60/hr
49,337
45,200
14 at 1,000
U14,590
11
I
5 1/.
t,400
54,956
1/2 at $1.90/hr
28,640
15,590
1.5
51.60/hr
16,135
1
ii1032/111c-s.
.5
1
480
$2,150Jvr
5.5
9,035
4.4
5,163
.20
1,040
61
1/2
12
6,850
18
at 4,238
0
35
51.75/hr
311,323
13,798
1/4
$750/yr
53
-
59,348
96,093
54,625
4$3,716/yr
10
53,592/yr FTE
2.5 '
10,000
15,200
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
10
11
12
13
14 15
16
17
18
19
20
NUMBER OF TITLES IN REFERENCE COLLECTION?
I.
A8
Cl
C2
7,500
20,600
500
100
154,773
7,200
3,639
4,000
11,50G
1,300
400
1,530
7,500
500
100
599
927
12,761
30,318
1,845
762
. 4,100
13,500
4J:00
6,600
132
12
9,00
13,059
2,144
2,700
7.5.4 of coll.
4,900
9,500
1504-
17
3,400
400
30
1,4,43
3,550
300
50
57;4
2,335
2,182
16
33
20,564
70,000
1,958
500
3,750
5,000
400
400
4,200
5,460
100
20
7,000
10,000
not kept
not kept
9,330
15,560
950
35
1,004
5,650
50
0
A.
Plumper of titles in reference collection?
B.
Number of volumes in reference collection?
C.
Annual turnover of reference
collection by number of titles?
1.
titles added
2.
titles weeded
INST
ITU
TIO
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
TOTAL REFERENCE TRANSACTIONS FOR:
1968-1069
1969-1970
1970-1971
2S,0841
18,528
22,062
18,034
18,223
18,360
..
10
8,418
9,528
11,631
3,703
7,600
13,250
4,600
4,986
.6,273
3,451
6,245
3
.,
1Partial figure
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ALLOCATION OF PROFESSIONAL TIME
C0
E.
.
10
35
20
20
15
10
30.
20
535
20
40
30
55
10
50
20
20
0
20
20
20
535
25
41
615
13
23
18
16
834
..
40
47
13
'
00
20
15
60
50
..15
25
60
00
63
11
13
10
3
10
30
535
20
525
60
10
0
33
25
35
34
20
575
00
10
30
25
35
0
150
37
210
15
40
10
10
25
10-15
30
00 L.
0
25
15
530
25
A.
Percent of professiond1 time -spent on administrative duties?
b.
Percent on short reference requests?
C.
Percent on large or long term projects?
D.
Locdtional?
F.
Others?
INSTITUTIOU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
USE OF COLLECTION
Undernrad
Graduate
Faculty
Staff
Other
50
20
10
317
55
15
20
55
50
535
i.:0
20
70
20
55
16
60
20
4.
.
50
10
20
15
f?.0
515
45
.
30
21
31
20
80
39
35
11
44
55
30
10
5
C5
14
1
55
20
10
312
40
40
13
2
35
25
25
15
50
30
13
2
50
25
515
5
50
15
20
510
- 70Z -
25
5......
Percent of use of collection by category
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20
1968-1969
1969-1970
1970-1971
1971-1972
100,667
15,070
15,670
16,740
17,500
16,748
21,394
25,700
26,525
11.5.0.
- 10,3001
.5,3801
20,9401
22,7101
79,995
86,425
92,030
95,000
ii.5.8.
61,608
70,682
70,589
..
5.0001
5,0001
5,0001
15,0001
51,250
56,488
58,203
.67,000
65,000
75,000
105,000'
120,000
31,003
36,000
32,000
35,000
:I.5.U.
32.200
44,600
58,505
49,600
64,175
.49,600
67,815
41,614
1Materlals
NSB - No separate budget
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
HOW MANY PROFESSIONAL STAFF HAVE YOU ADDED
NOT REPLACED)
1968-1969
1969-1970
1970-1971
1/2
-1
1/4P
1/2P
12
1-1
1/2
1
11 3 1NP
2
21
INSTITUTION
MOST PRESSING NEEDS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
.
.
Money; shelving and index tables; rooms; telephones
Student manpower; centralization of reference collections
Undivided reference collection's
Knomle,:ne of col...mnity resources; more adeouate freshman orientation
Trained assts. for ILL; more adenuate reference collection resources
Space; reading equipment; money; clerical personnel; improve reference tools, communications m/readers
Space; one sub-professional assistant
Z_sta!ilis::.:ent of a coherent reference service
Perst;p.el; increase pt/t personnel budnet; increase ref-book budget
:A,Iff; 't;..tee; suLject sprcialists; more ref. collections; access to outside collections ?. foreign translation
:.ock funds for genoral collections; increase budget allowance; speed up hound periodicals
Anoter professional; Comnletion of reclassification; more student help; more microform readers
'dne ddJitional full-time referent, librarian; more clerical help
Zvaludtiun of murk in the dept.; need f/planninn in personnel; space and collection
Incr-ase access to a/t words; NELMET should put local records into MR form f/Serials Union Cat.
Access to machine-readable info, data files; coordination of the ref. function of each public service dept.
'lore professional help
::ork space; staff
Space
INSTITUTION 1 2 3 4
NAME AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FILES: (Generatedby the Division)
13 9
41,505
693
712
a 913
10
9
11 12
4
13
4
14
20
15
16
17 18
9
19
20
5
10,219
576,250
6,700
109,300
GG 100
25,775
10,750
30,20u
17,557
9,073
A.
Total number of files?
B.
Total number of records?
