DOCUMENT RESUME 4 Gore, Pete H.; And Others .1, TITLE ... · 4 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 110 238 i RC...
Transcript of DOCUMENT RESUME 4 Gore, Pete H.; And Others .1, TITLE ... · 4 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 110 238 i RC...
4DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 110 238 i RC 008-685
AUTHOR Gore, Pete H.; And Others .1,
TITLE Quality of Rural Life: Assessing, the Structure andAvailability of Services and Amenities in Rural'Areas.
PUB DATENOTE
EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS
Aug 7532p.; Prepared for the annual meekting of the RuralSociological Society, San Francica, California,August 1975
J.
MF-$00.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS--POSTAGE*Community Development; *Community services;Comparative Analysis; *Evaluation Methods-; *RuralDevelopment; (Surveys; Theories*Crossroads Survey; New YorkIDENTIFIE
ABSTRACTCrossroads Survey, an adaptation of the
macrostructural nting techniques, was employed for purposes oftesting the comm velopment thery that services are added tocommunities in the say= quence. Dividing services and amenitiesinto 2 categories (commer 1 and public/professional), theCrossroads Survey was conduc in Clinton County and the Tug HillRegion (a 9 town-4 county area) New York State. Using telephonebooks and directories as secondar sources, surveyors conducted ,awindshield survey! of 81 Clinton Co and 21 Tug Hill crossroads,wherein those services visible ffbm a c were listed. Data analysisinvolved ordering commercial and public/pr essional services via theGuttman scale, a cumulative measure of comple ty, which revealed therelationship between the appearance of 1 service and that of another.'Comparative analysis of the 2 areas indicated that use of theCrossroads Survey and the Guttman scale could be most valuable in theassessment of services regardless of differences in politicalboundaries or population factOrs, since a comparison of the 2
_commercial scales revealed a'general patterning and a rank ordercorrelation of .77, and comparisdn of the 2 public/professionalservices scales showed a nk order correlation of .88. (JC)
********************44*************************************************Documemts acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished
* materials not available from othersources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best copy available. nevertheless, items of marginal *.
* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality ** of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available ** via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS)'. EDRS is not* responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions **,supplied. by EDPS are the best that can be made from the origiilal. *******,*****************,***************************45********************
QUALITY OF RURAL LIFE:
ASSESSING 'ISE STRUCTURE AND AVAILAB ITY OF
SERVICES AND AMENITIES IN RURA AREAS
of
'Peter H. Gore
Jer4meSandaU
Eileen StommeS
fir,.
' g
U.StDEPARTMENT OFHEALTH,EDUCATION IL WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTE Or
EDUCATIONTHIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT PAINTSOP VIEW OR OPINIONSSTATE() DO NOTNECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFIC/711.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFEOIJCATION POSITION OR POLICY
/Ins itutelor Man & Environment
State U iversity of New York at.PlattAbui'gh
and
epartment of Rural Sociology
ornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
re redP for they annual meeting of the RuralS
poc ological Society, Sa4. Francisco, California.
August , .1975
6 1102V
e
of
1.
11
/
0/
QUAIITY'OF RURAL LIFE:
ASSESSING THE STRUCTURE AND AVAILABILITY OF1
SERVICES AND AMENITIES IN RURAL AREAS
THE ISSUE
Community structure has been a .concern of soc.iol
ogists for many years, but often their stlidies 41,tre been
exOnsive, lengthy, unintelligible'to ordinary citizens,
and without much potential.for changing the sit*ation.
The recent resurgence of interest:,in rural areas,
in part as a result of the 1972 Rural Development Act
rof Conress, offers a new opportunity.tqapply, community
analysiS directly to the problem of improvini,the quality
_
of rural life.
V'Fifty years stgo rural a/sods were not :appealing
places to live, or at 4ast they didn't hnve the appeal
of the cities,,so the greet exodus from the countrysije
began. The migration t end, has only recentlyireversed-
(cf. Beale)1 but now many of tp services!andmuch of the
infratisuCture that were avail ble in :evert th4 "bad old
days" have evaporated from rural areas. :(see figure one)
How, then, can adequate services and amenities, from
doctors to laundromats to buses be made available so,
that rural quali oyeity of life impr,for thoSe who/,'
. live thei4e now and hopefully encourage fUrther, emigration
..
/ ;0"from metropblitan areas?
4
ono3
ti
. 2
Ile
I
L .41tBOro
o.
...
ti
V 0
'41701.4
*.
ta:-...t....._,D rt
$
V-4) Q---- ----.,,,, .:,\ ,. k'----.-4$4....,:4.,,........y
fi,,/,:,-_---.. ...;,........ 4, 1.7.:r
1:, --- 1.1 ....::...,..i..L.:. I ,,......i.A
i ..,.,...,.Wi.:
: ... 4,..i......"
(. .. 1.11..
.1^-
r-
-'-
14
....Z.-=
Some of the Midwestern interurban lines that operated in 1912.
Figure 1. Public transportation routes in 1912
(Source: Frank Rowsome Jr., Trolley Car Treasury
New York: Bonariza Books, 1956. p. 14.0)
0004
THE PROBLEM
The service delivery' problem in rural areas is th:it
-3-
a
widely scatterer resources are spottily available aver
large distances. Iiiihat'is needed is an,efficient and econ-
omic method of/ assessing the availability of services
in order to provide the best strategy for improving
access. It must be noted here that the authors consider,.
"services" very broadly, from such commercial.enterprises
as-gas stations and grocery stores to transportation to
health and social services. It could be argued that the
provision ?f many of these services can b'e related direct-
ly-to market economics, but-for some facilities which,
society subsidizes, a method must be provided for assess-
ing needandyrescribing locations.
THE APPROACH,
One way of assessing 'the availability of institutions
Or services in an area is the macrostructural accounting
technique as practiced by Young and others.2 Thi4 method
was recently used by Young and Moore-to prescribe
'potentially successful locations of certain institutions
such as cllnics.3.
;
An adaptation of'the macroStructural accounting
technique called the Crossroads;Survey 'was carried out
in the Rural Development Program in'Clinton County,New
York during the Sumther and Fall of 1974. Basically, the
J
e O
O O
-4=
specific objective of the Crossroads Survey was to deter-
mine the degree of access that rural residehts.hAve, to
needed services and amenities in order to develop the
necessary strategieis and programs to improve their quality
of life. .Services and amenities'wFi'e divided into two
major categories for the inventory and analysis:R2.. Commercial Services such as:
a. small grocery'b. gas station
-c. bard. hardware storee.; barberf. T-ecIption
2. Public and Professional Services such as:a. churchb. post officec. public schoold. doctore. lawyerf. dentistg.* clinic--
THEORY-.
One theory of community development is that services
are added to communities in the same sequence; fpranstance,
gas stations may be'present before barber shops. This
implies that all communities in 'a given areahave the
same service priorities and relative intensities of demand.
Of course, overlapping functions of some services and
ease of access in adjacent areas may-alter the pattern in
specific localities., If a large enough area, a county,
for' example, is inventoried, however, an ,overall pattern
0008
,
_5_
shquld emerge,. The theory can lip test through the use
of a statistical technique called Guttman scaling.
INITIAL DATA COLLECTION./
The object of the crossroads survey was to inventory _
in.an efficient way the services available in Clinton
kCounty with regard to the'localitiesyhere they exist.
Two secondary resources were available -- a telephone00
book and the Clinton County Council of Community Srvices
Directory. These resources, however,, were neither
exhaustive nor did they always distinguish among the
. various service lOcalities.:or "crossroads" within sub
areas of the county.' Inorder to deal With these short,
comings in the secondary sollt-c0, a "windshield survey"
of _81 Clinton County crossroads was, conducted. (see
figure two) This survey entailed drivin through'each4
of the crossroads. and listing all the services and organ.
izations that were evident upon sight. In the larger
crossroads, a windshield survey was relat4*ly difficult
and time consuming, bUt the great number`la slightly
populated localities in Clinton County made such a
survey a fairly simple matter overall. .Intthis manner,'
157 different, services were identified.
Fifty of the 81 crossroads-had at least one of .the
cataloged services; the other 31 ,had only houses or
stop signs. The services thus identified can be grouped
00. 07
I
. ,., 1
0 r.r.Y.1 0
I
0 ii
.........._ ..- - -- - I 0 .1-1 1
L". ..... 0
4... __ __ .. .. /
- I -7-1-11 e (I.
0et 1 /
11_____..---0
n I
I0 0 I
. . . .... ...... ...= ... -J ....& ' ,!
,
.... ..... ...., ...1 MOND 11I ........ MEM MNO
-- - -- IMO
0
o.
1
1
11
1 0 0 10r - -I : 0
0 1 -1:1 0 0,
MEMO -- - - - - --I
I o
Figure 2. &ossroads in,Clinton County
0 r)
.
0 = named crossroad
= crossroad withsore service
1
. , .
A
under four general classfficationS commercial, :.procoss,
o
ionall'voluntary organizations and public-serviceP.,
-A listing of the services found with the survey is attached.
(Appendix A)
Two thingS are evident up0n examination of the items)
in thi list: 41?
-1. The items do not seem of equal significance when :'- we think of improving the quality of rural life.
For instance, a swimming pool construction firm. or a fitim that deals with granite seems less
worthyAof consideration'in our scales than doesa gro4ry store or a-pharmacy. However, a completecataleg ip desirable because it is useful to haveas much information as possible to help localcommunities make development ddcisions. It alsoeliminates the need for researchers to makeartifi6ial decisions in choosing what items toinclude.
2. Some of -thd items can be combined. For instance,general stores ancismall groceries serve muchthe same function, as do restaurants and diners.Auto dales includes used car firms: Hobby shonsrange from sewing and leathercraft to'rocktihopnand antiques. It might be that farm supply and,seed stores could be logically combined. Thelogic of possible combinations, s likely to bpdependent on the investigator's(firSt-handknowledge of the economic behav or,of arearesidents.
IS
he theory discussed previously maintains that the
services found in localities can be order, by lotality,
in a Guttman Scale that indicates a relatively fixed
sequence of community Service development; Guttman
Scale is a statistical device which is a cum lative
t
.0009
I
.memlure o/eomplexity. In the commercial scale presented
I
'below, Witis means that any crossroad Or place with a car
ropnir establishment will also have gas service and
esmk1 (irocery. .The appearanc of any particular servicer ,
e
(t s indicates not nly its prVsencp, but nlso predicts
(
that ther:servi.bes er doWh the kale will also be
preseht. The scale therefore gives the present level. s, --,
1
of complexity of 'crossroad or place/ °,
In idditiOn to the complexity of a ertain place, the
scale offers a historical view of the appearance of serr.
vices. It shows, by comparing the most omplex places
with the least complex places, the order in which
institutions or 4rvices appeared in the past - -anal cnn4
be expected to appear in the future.
The scale will show by gaps in. the expected pattern
e.
where a service/institution should exist, but is absent.
k
Its absence can be'attributed eitheer to a functional
alternative which fills the 'same service n ed, or to ,
fle existence o1 a like facility within eas access. It
can also show - -by a number of scale gapS followed by the
Presence of a service--when an institution e ists whic'h
te too far:out oh the scale for thp crossroad to s
it. In other words, the pattern of instituti
lefads up to and, provides /a base for, that servib
occurred. By examinin the leading
tution' present in a p rticular crossroadt1
onin
pport
w ich
h(0-not
ast insti
an predict
a
-9-
with some assurance which service will appear next.
This next service will `have a reasonable chance of success ,
since it has the institutional base to support it. An
example of how a simple scale would work follows. From
this scale with its array of services, a number of.r
inferences can be made. --ii-Y
it s
Ga4 Grocery Car, Beauty LiquorCommunity Station Store Repair, Shop Store
A X 0 9 X X X
B X X 0 XC 0 X XD X X
2 presence of service0 = absence of service
1. The feasibility of community A obtaining a'grocerystore should be investigated.
2. Community B may be able to support a car repairbusiness and, if it is an expanding area, aliquor store.
3. In the same mannervicommunity C should be ablto have a gas station and pos'sible a beauty shop.-
4. Community D might beg.able to support a° carrepair shop.
In sfiort, the Scale can be an immediate tool for'
economic development by helping to ascertain the
services a community could most feasibly attempt to add
to its array of services.
One constraint to these recommendations is that in
some communities local reasons may make,ths presence of
0 1 1
a,
"J
, ,%""
some service innovations unnecessary. For instance, a
local nonprofit group might be showing movies; localt.
1
conditions might rule out the profitable operation of a
coinoperated laundry. It could also be that two'4
/local
ities are essentially a single community and consideration;
of their services separately is= erroneous. Aiso, wind
shield surveys and secondary sources are not flawless 4
*means of compiling information. e
The Scales derived from the study should, therefore,..
be used as a guide or "tipoff" for local indepth ,. I
r ,4 ',, 1
economic feasibility studies to be done on tkWindicated,
6
/t
items, not as a.100,percent sure prediction)of-Miat..,'
.. 410services should,be added. In terms of specific 'recomm4ndations t'he best ptocedure is -,to examine the
,s, .)
'hot
scales for gaps and "lering edge" services. After these .
are est4blished, local . interviews should be conciliated,
to 'see why a service is'' not 'available locally or if' people, .
thought it was feasible:' If these indications are..°,, .
positive, a more detailed economic feasibility study
could be done and then some new service established.'. : .
.
CONCLUSIONS
The two Guttman /scales on the following pages'have
been derived from the data,
collectpdin the' windshield
$ survey as a preliTinary. indication of the.feasIbility
of service innovations.
0012rC
t e54.4
-11 If
t.; I.
0.
.
0 .O 0 . V t.:
a: e,.. . ,.. I. i . L il (.1 Al t V.-I
O t ..0 0 a: V 0 0 0 0 g :::1
a. II g ..a 4,... 1. to...a te tr. a.: G 1 .-I g
a, 60 1. r.. 1. 4 03 1. 1.m E g . 0 .4,
.,-1 . .0 v .il ., 4: g ini; r. ro ...." 74,.. 1 '1 17-4 .,t4 .FLP'
,71 ,vn . . 0 . . i. ,. Xa s.a ..... a .....C. 1. t.' 11): t)$.7'.'goil v 0.g o S. °
.-I ni 74 .e. vja .. cu .a CD .:3 I-I g = 4 v 0 .0 I.
.1 ':-.1
1..',, t,
Al ft t) A. A. fg V :ft
Champlain' -XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XKoeseville XXXX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX X
RbusesiPqnt: X X XX XX XXXXXX XX XX XX.XX XX XXXPeru X X X X X X XX
sXXXX XX XX XX XX XX XX X ®,
Dannemorn XX XX XX X4X XX XX XX XX XX OX OX X
AuSable Forks XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXChazy XX XX XX XX OX XX .XX XO XXEllenburg Depot XX XX XO X.X OX XX OX XXMooers Xx XX XO X'X XX XX XX
..,
,Ellenburg Center XX XX XO XO XWest Chazy _. X X X X X0 XXCadyville 1 XX XX XX XXBeekmantown CornersXX0XXX'Merrill X X
0
XX XX XX., Moffitsville X 0 OX XX ,
Clintonville X 0 X X X
Clayburg XO XX X.Redford XX 0 x 0 X
Mooers Forks XX X X X r
Lyon Mountain OX XO X X X
So.. 1attsborgh X 0 X X
,Churubusco X X X"k.
.W. Plattsburgh X X X X X X
Picketts,Crs. X X I X /
\Schuyler Falls X 0
Sciota' X 0 7 X
Morrisonville X X X X X
Saranac X X X X
Forest X X Y
Altona I X X X ,X
Black Brook X.-
. Coopersville X
Crowlbym Crs. X .
EllenbUrg Crs. X X X
Harkness X .,
Perry Mills X X
Port Kent X
Riverview X
Standish1!
Woods Millb
AuSable Chasm X
Cannon Crs.
Champlain Park . X
Dwyers Crs. X
Inraht:
Ledger ere.
4
X
X
Figure ).
Guttman Scale of Commercial Services
in Clinton County
Coefficient of Scalability: .69
0013
0
I
41.
.1".
4.L.0
0-44
Vt)
4.4.C.)SiOVE
= 0 1.6...I
C.) 114 M FKOOSOVIIIC X X X
Rouses Feint X X X X
AuSable Forks X X X X
Champlain X, X X 0
Dannemora X . X X X
Ellenburg.Depot "X kx -x' . 0
Mooers , X 0
Chas)! X X X ,X
'Peru X' X X x
Lyon Mountain X ,fX X 0
West Chazy X C x' 0
Altona X 0, X
Morrisonville 1XXXCadyville s. I X X 0
12OO
0 Vf
0V/
0 t. L. 140 u 0
.0 .0 0 1.4
A. I-10
CI10.1
10A.
X X X X X
XXX XXX X X X
XXX XXX X 00 X X
X X 0X X X
X X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
'Ellenburg Center 0 x 0 X
Churubuscor .X X X X
Mooers Forks K X X
Saranac X ,X
Ellenburg Corners X X X
ApSable Chasm X X
Port Kent X °
Redford . 'X X
Schuyler Falls X X
Clintonville
Black Brook
Coopersville.
Harkness
Jericho
Peasleeville
Sciota
Standish
Beekman Corners
So. Plattsburgh
Cannon Corners
Champlain Park
Clayburg
Croniley Corners
Dwyers Corners
E. Beekmantown
Perry Mills . X
Picketts Corners X
Forest
Hawkeye
High Bank
Honeymooers Corners
'X
X
X
X X X
00.4
,0 M0 0 0.0
0.0VCWOC hN mr
XXO XXXXX XXX ,X x x
X X X
X
X
Figure 4.
Guttman Scale of Public & Professional 4ervices
in Clinton County
Coefficient'of scalability: .77
y'
V
fS
li F7
,..
ti
k
13
By looking at the commercial scale, for instance,
we might 'bnclUd-tht Keeseville would be able to support
a copying service; Dannemora should be able to "fillih"
the gap created by. an absence of a recreational facility
(bowling alley, pool hall). The seriesf gaps for a
liquor store and for gas service are alao suggestions for
possible innovations.
When coupled frith demogra d geographic data,
some service absences noted e commercial, scale are
glaring; Lyon Mountain is sizable community-: l'6cated about
from its nears service center, but 4t has no
grocery store.
In the public and
of the gaps indicate
fessional services scale, some
not be filled in because the tare
politically mandated, f r example, town offices and public
school. On the other h d, the scale does show that
communities like Dannemora and Mooers should be able to
support a doctor, and that the feasibility of a clinic
in Keeseville should be investigated. It is thilsort
of "tipoff" which the Guttman scale technique Performs
best. It can predict, based on the pattern of complexity
present on a number of communities what institutions or
services could be expected in communities that have a
given level of differentiation.
The commercial services scale correlated with the
public and professional services scale at .73 which indicates
-14
that the two cOmplexit measures tended to corroborate
one nother. Th\sy alsO,correlated with population approx,I
imat y 75 to .80 wnich is to be expected.
nother way o view the correlation is graphically
in' f& e five. Xn this drawing, the two scales are
superi ose&on a ouny map and areas'of,coincidence are
readily pparent.
Als easily, identified are those c unities whose
commercia services cored higher than the public'and
professional ones and viceversa. These discrepancies can
immediately become the focus for local discussion and
planning. In fact, it is hoped that the information
will be useful to local leaders such as town supervisors,
county legislators, planners, and others interested in
stimulating-community economic development, by assisting'
them temeet local service needs. It might also provide'
at least a partial guide to investment opportunitiei In the
county for local entrepreneurs ., The data gathered in
this project is available for all to use in whatever
manner.most:useful to them.
In summary, the crossroads inventory in this case
produced a large amount of usef 1 economic and social data
for a rural county at a minimum of expense:
, JD
Data collection:
Preparation of.; Tor computer: 80 hours
60 hours1000 mile 4" driving
Analysis of data: 40 hours
11;
0010
A
I
&
S. so.
&ma .1 . I .I ,, .
-r___..........._. _ Im =, 64 4nm. OWNED 010, A, .4hli40t?". _rte
P-- Id........
I
"4. AIO'St' .r...
4
=NOM OM= Ow* 4.0
I S
I
I.
. Figure 5.
Clinton County Commercial Services Icale
superimposed to the left of the
Public and Professional Services Seale.
-16o
In many cases the data collection can be pprformed by
local volunteers which would keep the cost, of'such a study.
low. (See Appendix B f detailed instructions on how do-
conduct a Crobsroads Su vey.)
CASE II - TUG HILL REGIONAL STUDY.
As a corrobor-ationLand further eestr,of the Crossroads_
technique a similar study was undertakenjp the nine core(
towns of the Tut" Mill Region of New York Stat:e'hetween
Syracuse and Watertown. In this case,tYv initial invQns
tory data was gathered by local planning officials and thenF:
analyzed at Cornell University.
,S ALE RSULTS'AND CONCLUSIONSry
The Tug Hill windshield survey of .nine towns'with 21
c ossroads of imnortance resulted in two complOdtSr 5cales.
( ec figures 6 and 7) In contrast to,tho Clintdn County
1
scales, the data from thp Tug Hill reginnancluded some
places outside of the defined area of -.tudy hepaurr, the
nine towns in the core region are so thinly settled and have
so-few services,
The commercial scale shows that most specialized;
services come from outside the nine town. region. (See map
rin figure 8) Lowviile, Pulaski, Adams, Boonville and Camden
provide most commercial services. The crossroads within
the area provide seririees such as beauty parlors, barS,-
auto repairs which require a.small population base. The
0018-
Py
r
tii 1
i if ti ... t. .1
:::
A .. If 1..:.ircr2ii613 :".1 d ib1
$ 1/31,«;:....tjzili`'?. 5 ; ^ 1 F 1. -1 E g i )
i 1 a A I Illni .1 .% a 24 1 i P i
NI .7.
t1 g 3 S 2 a E,2 a
, ..1,s .. a ?, : t: ::. X F, 43 4 ii. ,...1' ,i fi ,, .. a. rai i.
Lemollls X X X X X X I X X I I I I I I I X X X i X X I Z * * ! * XIII XX Jy f XXX IX 1.XIIIII 4Pulaski I I I I X X X X X X X X X X X I X I I I X X X Z * * * * XXXI X X XXOXX 10X XXXIISoonyIllm I XI IX X 2X'Xx IX XIX XX XXIXXX XX X XX XXXI XX XXXXX XII XXX°Adam , 2 X X X X X X X X I I I X X X X X XOIXX X XXI XX XXXX X X XXXXX XXICamden X I X 1NX I I X X X X 1 ' X X X I X XXIII X XXI IX XXIX X X XXXILyons Palls X X 0 XX IOX XIII XXX OX X00XXO X00 XX XXXISandy Crook XXI) XX XIO 2IXX XIX X0 XIIXXX XXI
/ ConstablosIlli X X 0 X I X 1 0 2 X X 0 10 0 2 1 X
Lama ' X X X X X X X X 0 X X X I X I X
O1oft1111 201 XI ZOX X X 2
111111sastowm 1 X X0 XX III I X X.2
X
Redfield i I I I X X I I,.. . X I IBarnes Corners I X I X I
4Yost Itsrtlnabors 0 0 X X
Nen Boston 00X I040401* 2I X
foramsThompson Corners I
Iartinstrang IEast MorsinsburgZ
North O000ls I
4
Figure 6.
Guttman Scale of Commercial Servicesinthe Tug Hill Region
3(Coefficient of -111abilityl .72)
00.1,9
6
.
Lowville
Booneville
Camden
Pulaski
Adams
Sandy Creek
Lacona
Martinsburg
Constableville
Williamstown o
Florence.
Glen field
Lyons Falls -
... Redfield
Osceola '
..,
c0a )
..41.
....o omo
m s. o
.c .. 't*': Ap. "21° t' I. il LI.; -4
O V O. 0-1
5 E =0O 0 .
0 . . 0 0
0 1. to 0. .. 1. .1 .1 A'x xi If, g
,=,
18
8=
O
O0.
X X X X X' X X X X XX X 0 X X X X 0 0 X 0 X X
X X XX XX...XXX XXXX XXX XI 0 X X X xxX X xx xxxxl xxxxxxx xxxX ix xx rx xxi xxxx xxo xxxxx xx xo xxx xxxx xxx xxx,o xx xoxxx X X
xjo xx x x oxox, o.x xx x
x0 XX XX X(
X IX X XXXX. X 0 0 X X
X X 0 .X X
X 0 -x.x X
X oxxxxx x
Barnes Corners X Xti
.xWest Martinsburg 0 X
New Boston X
Thompson Corners
East Martinsburg
North Osceola
ti
Figure 7.c>
iluttman Scale of Public anti)Professional Services
an the Tug Hill Region
(00off dent of Scalability: .72)
020 (""'-----)
XXX XX
X
THE JUG HILL REGI9N-
CROSSROADS.
Sandy Cr:eek4
Locono
Pulaskit
Adorns`4..°. f
eft on oftLo Viville
-4I ----'"14031i-BPstgnme
II I West Mortinstiurg
I I .East Martinsburgalb1 I Marli nsburg
,
r 7.-1 I' ... Glenfield
r 1 1 A %
tf ,..184 t/1134 fitosceore-i
%-
'.%°"°, ..
Redfield II / .eonstobleville , .
I I, lv*lb i Oscolcv %%0
e BoonvilleWilliamstown ! Florence)
IV
1;% .
jib
I41'Geornes Comers
% ThOpson Corers%,64161
Camden
Figure 8/. Map of the Tug* Hi/.1 Region
0021
services within.-tbeTeglOn generally call, for a lower.
capital investment, and can be maintained by a.very small
O
o6
pa
work ortanizOtion.sUch.as,a familyLox by oneiperson. If..°
not supported entirely, by such a businRss, the owner/
operator can supplementhis.income by a second job. The
services offeredoutside the aria; of the other band, require.
a larger population base andes larger', capital investment.
,Full time work at the serVicells in occupation is often6
-required. Examples are clothing store, department store,
s ..
bank and furniture store. .11owevervsince then least complex''
6rossroads (North Qscebla,, East,Martinsburg, Martinsburg,
'Thompson Corners, Florence) have access to .th:-., more complex
villages of Lowville, Pulask;diAdams anthCamden, these.
service.., . . . .
service deficiencies can be corrected., .:
The leading items_ on the,commertial wile for the ,..', -
least complex crass s, (Flo-,
tence,'Thorilpson Corners, Martins--.,- , . -
\.
burg; East artinsburg, North OsC9ola) are small grocery,
hptei, beau ty parloro'gas, bai4, fahn supply, auto repair.
Given the observations on small population base, capital
investment, and small personnel requirements, the most
plausible "next" services wolild seem to be 'small grocery,
gas station? bar and auto repair. Howev.erithe question
of viability arises as thes e least`E.-
omplex crossroads-41ree
located relatively close to more complex plfices which
provide tie services. Easy accessability may be why the.
service had not appeared rin the less complex crossroads.
4
s.
a
21
The public and professional scale duplicates the
pattern of the commercial scale. Again most" ervice
provided from outside he nine town area. The service
provided within the area
Fire Department, Post Off rice,
are
are government mandated servic
halls. The services provid
while including governme\t ma
such as dentist,
are supplied by the pri
p blicand professional se ices fd nd in the area surveyed,
,out ,of 254or 56 percent are gover ent provided.
The public and profedtionat.scale fers relatively
same prospect as does, the commercial scale. The leading
5:'
school, town and municipal:-
by the,surrounding area,
dated services, are services
and veterinarians which
con ic sector.' Of the 25
item are lawyer, newspaper, doctor, town gara and veter
inarian. Since they are private sector services rat
than publicly'mandated, they need a certain population ba
to survive. Again, the least complex crossroads ( Net,04oston,
Thompson Corners, West Martinsburg, East Martinsburg, North
Osceetola) have access to-more complex centers'from which the
absent services are available.' Figure nine shows the
relaltive complexity of the 6ommunities1 dn.the two scales,
commercial services to the left and publit and professional
serviCes.to the right.
The two scales rank the crossroadel-in approximately
-the same order. The two ranks showed a correlation of .76
:indicating that a town with a high complexity on;ithe'
0023
fiA
-.22
THE TUG HILL REGfeIN
COMMERCIAL SERVI
PUBLIC AND PR FESSION RVICES
Figure 9.
Tug Hill Region Guttman scales superimpos
0024
-23-
I
commercial scale also shows high complexity on the public
d professional scale. A townproviding:an array of
c mmercial services also offers an array of public and
professional services.
A final obstirvation on functional alternatives can
be added heie.' In the case of the gaps/in the spe.sev-.-
eral reasons could be given:t,,A,gap may appear irthe service
is available in another forM.'For example, Lyons Falls
lacks a bar. The same function may be filled by a diner/ti
restaurant with an on-premises liquor license which is
present., Or, alternatively, two crossroads may be
1 bated in such close proximity that-one service fills
the needs for both crossroads. An example is the Sandy
Creek-Lacona combination. SandyCreek lacks a gas statipn:
Lacona has one. Lacona lacks an auto repair and barber:
Sandy=CMpei-provides those-services. Since Sandy Creeko
and Lacona border'each other, it cannot be said Lacona
- lacksthe services Sandy Creek provideslor vice versa.
DISCUSSION
Since the scales turned out so well in both-of the
areas, a certain'face validity may be ascribed to the
.CrOssroads technique. What is more, the two areas
examined, were quite. different: one, Clinton County, is
a
Hi
ingle pdlitical unit; the nine core towns in. title Tug
1 Region are parts of four different counties. The
0025
a
e
4
4
.
Hz,,,J. ,
,;; r.-.L.1 .seems to w'rk for assessing serlfices
regardless of political boUndaries..
I
On-a more analytic no'
.technique then,
e, a com arison of t
commercial scale reveals general: terning.., ,
items: ,l'oott.ind iteM are at the most prevale t side
two
e
,.A.of both sCAles while 'rec eation and clothing item's` -pppear
at the more re tri Among,the" 24 itemk_which-,'
were the 'same' on both sc ere was a rank order
.correlation of .77,.not too bad a correspOndende,
ten gives the actual ra,ks for each of the'
Figure
It does seem, ther} thAt commercial services pccur in
1
much the same patterns, not necessarily dictated by
geography or populatiOn.
A similar clamparativo analysi:lifor thr.public and
pmfessional services scales showed ncorrolltion .8A.
CLINTCN COUNTY
s
churchpost officfire static
publib school?town hall
doctor
i. lawyer
,,Oft'USDA
clinic
.newspapqr
optometrist
RANK TUG HILL
1 ch0Ch
24
4 town hall
3 5 I school
4 2 f post ofi'inm
3 fire .statii5n6 library.
7 7 doctor.
8 8 lawyer
9 10 *newspaper
.10 13 dentist.
11 12 optometrist
12 9 'Clinic
13 11 ``USDA
,J
D
.4Y
( -25
Figure 10.r's%
Rank order of Commercial Serviceg
in Clinton County and Tug Hill
CLINTON COUNTY RANK,"
4small. grocery 1
gas 2
3
2
car repair 3 .. 7.
diner _ 4 . 1
bar 5 5
liquor 6 15
beauty shop 7 4
lumber 8 14
funeral 9 17
insurance 10 - 9
hobby ai 6
hardware 12 10
barber 13 12
laundromat 14 18
batik 15 19
department store 16 23
construction 17 16
pharmacy 18 11'
recreation 19 13
large grocery 20 8
clothing 21 24
:plumbing and heating 22 20 '
radio TV . '23 221 4
dry cleaner 24 21
4.
01)27
TUG HILL
restaurant/diner
gas
L small grocery
beuty shop
bar
hobby
auto repair
large grocery
insurance
hardware
pharmacy
barber
recreation
lumber
liquor
construction
funeral
laundromat
bank
plumbing and heating
ndry cleaer.
radio TV
department store
clothing
-26-
SUMMARY
Accessibility to services in these studies has been
shown to .be a lunation of community structure -- and to,a ,
certain extent, the distance one is from a more complex
or differentiated community. The argument should not be
made, based-On these studies, that .every crossroads shoUld
have every item, or service. Rather, the crossroads survey
technique can point out where some service could likely
be supported, but is not present. The question of the
best balance between many subrcommunities with few services
in each versus a few highly differentiated central comm
unities offering a large array of services is not 14thin
the scope of this study. It is a'questiom which must be
increasingly asked, though, as transportation costs increase
and rural areas attempt to become more viable and "quality"
places to live.
The further dimension, of quality of service or even
access in terms of money or appointment time is another
This paper offers thearea for further investigation.. ,
starting point for community analysis of acc1ess to services.
Some understanding of the community s' Cture and locationr ,
of services can be obtained by using tie technioNes
described. Each 6ommunity must then examine its unirfue
situation to discover and plan the best way to provide
needed services to its citizens.
O
Commercial
-27-
Appendix A
9Crossroads Survey
Clinton County Services Inventory
C-1generqrstoke.
gas puilip
gas service station
insurance /realty
recreation (boking, pool)
movie theatre
rive -in' theatre
funeral home
bar
motel/hotel
hardware
restaurant
diner/coffee.sh0
auto sales
auto repair
furniture
beauty parlor
barber shop
coin-op.laundry
dry cleaner & laundry8
ti
pharmacy
liquor store
large grocery store (chain)
small grocery store
clothing
'umber, building materials
bank
credit assn.
appliances 7
variety store
sporting goods
Office supply
watch repair
motorcycles
tourist attraction
car wash
radio & TV
fuel oil
seedsmen
Agway
hobby
granite
4
'At
manufacturing, packing, bottling.boat sales i
farm implements.
lawn &.garden im lements
telephone corporation
fast food
NY State Electric & Gas
trucking.
dairy pkoducts
apples
construction/excavation
publishing
customs brokerj
research]
photographer
copying
0029 s.
Commercial (con'0
plumbing pr. heating
department store
mobile homes
trailer court
Western Union
florist
auction place
snowmobiles
general.repair
nursery
salvage
taxi
janitorial
swimming pools
contractors
gifts
4
Voluntary Organizations
American Legion
Rotary
Knights of Columbus
Lions
Kiwanis
businessthen's assn.
RighttoLife
sports club
golf club
civic assn.
Masons
VFW
Elks
other voluntary organizations
;8Ap&hdix A
(codrt)
0630
Professional
architects
Al TechnIcian
lawyer
clinic
Physician
optometrist
Public Services
rest home
rehabilitatiol
newspaper
church
fire department
Town Offices
Garage/Shed (Town, Villag,e)
park
library
power station
town hall
youth center
parochial school-
public school.
school district offices
NYS Dept. of EnvironmentalConservation
State Police
Correction Facility
Courty Cffices
County Highway Dept.
Post Cfice-9 fa
USDA
Customs
Village Offices
29Appendix B
Some Suggested. Steps and Hints' forConducting a Windshield Survey
is Check the secondary sources (telephone books, commercialdirectories, etc.) first to get an idea of the numbPrs andkinds of services in given a=reas. This will give you agood idea of what to expect when driving around the area.
2. Obtain a good map of the planningiarea, preferably one thatincludes the names of all crossroads that are named. Atthevery least, the map should include all roads, from inierstate.highways to unimproved earth roads.
Carefully plan the routes-in undertaking the, Windshieldsurvey. Usually, the less' backtracking one does, the more1pcalities can be covered in the allocated time, and the lessgas will be consumed.
As you dirve through a locality note the full name of thevarious establishments and services so that later confusionswill be minimized; e.g. Sample's General Store, Barn DoorGrill.
5. It is important to drive along all routes that pass throughg locality, for they are where the commercial services arelikeiy to be located. rn the l'grger localities, one mustcheck the parallel streets on'either side of the thoroughfares. When passing through intersections, glance down toboth ends of the street being crossed; churches are frequently located in residential sections. Of course, it isalso possible one will turn up a beauty parlor that operatesout of someone!s front porch.
6. Some firms will be located outside the legal or apparentlimits of-a locality. It becomes a problem, thin, to attachthe service to a locality. The safest tactic seems to beto exactly note its-setting and attach it to a localitywhen supplemental information has been obtained.
7.' After the drive through survey has been completed, crosscheck this listing with the secondary sources to fill-outthe inventory and make it more complete.
1
MI31
.t
' r
-30-
References
1. Calvin Beale, "V ere are all ,e,people going;Demographic tren s." Working aper, National Confcr%nce on Rural America, Washington,j). C., April, 1975.
2. Frank W. Young, "A Pioposal for cocppera4ve cross.
cultural research on Intervillage Systems." HumanOrganization, Vol. 25, 1966, pp. 42-50.'*
Frank W: Young and Isao Fujimoto. -- 'Social Differentiation in Latin American communities." EconomicDevelopment and Cultural Change,, Vol. 11', 1965,pp. 344-52.
-A,
. Dan E. Moore, Philip Taietz, and 'Frank W. Young,"Location of Institutions in Upstate New York.:Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station,Search Bulletin, Vol: 4, No. 12,-1974, ,p9. 7.
3
4
1 D
#0.:3 2
Ata
SAL
J
V
O