Document ID: 0.7.522.351270 From: Alejandro Huerta To ... · Alejandro A. Huerta Environmental...

From: Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Stephanie Eyestone-Jones <[email protected]>; Laura Rodriguez <[email protected]>

Subject: Crossroads WSA Request Letter Resubmitted

Hello Earl,

Attached is the Request Letter. I have copied the project's environmental consultants. I respectfully askthat the start date of the request be backdated to March 31, when the original Request Letter wassigned for by DWP per the attached document.

To expedite the process, the applicant will hand deliver the check . To whom and where should thecheck be delivered?

Thank you,Alejandro A. HuertaEnvironmental Analysis • Major Projects

(213) 978-1454

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Alejandro,

Per our phone conversation this morning, please cancel check and re-submit with Request Letter.

In addition, you may also reply-all to this e-mail with PDF of Request Letter so we may process prior toreceiving hardcopy.

Thank you!

Date: Fri Apr 15 2016 10:03:24 PDTAttachments: Crossroads WSA Request Letter_3-31-16.pdf image002.jpg image003.jpg Original_WSA_Receipt.pdf

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270

of 8813

Earl Moosbrugger, PE

Resources Development and Supply Assessment Group

Water System Executive Office / Water Resources Section

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450

Los Angeles, CA 90012

(213) 367-2527

From: Alejandro Huerta [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:32 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Hwang, JinSubject: Re: WSA Request Letter

Hello Earl,

Per our phone conversation, we'll look forward to hearing tomorrow morning regarding the status of theWSA Letter and check.

Sincerely,

Alejandro A. Huerta

Environmental Analysis • Major Projects

(213) 978-1454

Image removed by sender.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Hwang, Jin <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Alejandro and Laura,

of 8813

The Planning Department should send the WSA request letter to the following address:


Mr. Martin L. Adams, Senior Assistant General Manager for Water System

111 North Hope Street

Room 1455


A check in the amount of $17,000 should be attached to the WSA request letter, payable to: LosAngeles Department of Water and Power.

Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions.

Jin Hwang

Civil Engineering Associate


Water Executive / Water Resources

111 N. Hope St. Room 1468


213-367-4845

From: Alejandro Huerta [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 7:38 AMTo: Laura RodriguezCc: Hwang, Jin; Kwan, DelonSubject: Re: WSA Request Letter

Hi Jin/Delon,

I am good with the WSA request letter prepared by Eyestone so please proceed as necessary.

of 8813

Alejandro A. Huerta

Environmental Analysis • Major Projects

(213) 978-1454

Image removed by sender.

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Laura Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Jin/Delon,

We are working with the City on a project that will need a WSA. Alejandro Huerta, copied on this email,is the planner for the project. We have the WSA request letter ready to submit to you. What is theprocess?

Thank you

Laura RodriguezPrincipal Planner

EE logo -- horizontal stack (RGB, screen-res, 3

6701 Center Drive West, Suite 900

Los Angeles, California 90045

T (424) 207-5333

F (424) 207-5349

DIRECT (424) 207-5339

EMAIL [email protected]

of 8813

Statement of Confidentiality. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidentialand are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmissionis sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received thistransmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or phone anddelete this message and its attachments, if any.

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------------------Confidentiality Notice--------------------------This electronic message transmission contains information from the Los Angeles Department of Waterand Power, which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that anydisclosure, copying, distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited. If you havereceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the originalmessage and any attachment without reading or saving in any manner.


of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270-000001Owner: Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>Filename: Crossroads WSA Request Letter_3-31-16.pdfLast Modified: Fri Apr 15 10:03:24 PDT 2016

of 8813

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING

- CITY PLANNING COMMISSION

DAVID H. J. AMBROZ PRESIDENT

RENEE DAKE WILSON

VICE-PRESIDENT ROBERT L. AHN

CAROLINE CHOE RICHARD KATZ JOHN W. MACK

SAMANTHA MILLMAN VERONICA PADILLA DANA M. PERLMAN

- JAMES K. WILLIAMS

COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (213) 978-1300

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

EXECUTIVE OFFICES 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 525 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-4801

VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP

DIRECTOR (213) 978-1271

LISA M. WEBBER, AICP DEPUTY DIRECTOR (213) 978-1274

JAN ZATORSKI DEPUTY DIRECTOR (213) 978-1273

FAX: (213) 978-1275

INFORMATION

http://planning.lacity.org

March 31, 2016

Mr. James McDaniel, Chief Operating Officer—Water System Mr. Delon Kwan, Water Resources Planning and Policy CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 North Hope Street, Room 1455 Los Angeles, California 90012 Re: REQUEST FOR WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT—THE CROSSROADS

HOLLYWOOD PROJECT Dear Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Kwan:

California Senate Bill (SB) 610, effective January 1, 2002, states that a water supply assessment must be provided to local governments for inclusion in any environmental documentation for certain projects subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, SB 610 requires that for certain projects, the CEQA lead agency must identify any public water system that may supply water to the proposed project and request the public water system to determine the water demand associated with the project and whether such demand was included as part of the most recently adopted Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Per Section 10912 of the California Water Code (CWC), a project which is subject to the requirements of SB 610 includes: (1) a shopping center or business establishment that will employ more than 1,000 persons or have more than 500,000 square feet of floor space; (2) a commercial office building that will employ more than 1,000 persons or have more than 250,000 square feet of space; or (3) any mixed-use project that would demand an amount of water equal to or greater than the amount of water needed to serve a 500 dwelling unit project.

The Crossroads Hollywood Project (hereafter referred to as the Project) meets Criteria 1 and 3 above. The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) has been identified as the public water system (as defined in CWC Section 10912 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15083.5(e)) that would serve the Project. Accordingly, the Department of City Planning (CEQA lead agency for the Project) requests that the LADWP: (1) determine whether the estimated water demand associated with the

Crossroads WSA Request Letter_3-31-16.pdf for Printed Item: 1058 ( Attachment 1 of 4)

of 8813

Mr. James McDaniel, Chief Operating Officer—Water System LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER March 31, 2016 – Page 2 Project was included as part of LADWP’s most recently adopted UWMP; and (2) prepare and approve a water supply assessment using the UWMP or new analyses for the Project pursuant to CWC Section 10910 et seq.

The requirements for a water supply assessment include the identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, or water service contracts held by LADWP’s public water system, and prior years’ water deliveries received by LADWP’s public water system. Please refer to CWC Section 10910 (d)(2) for the documentation required to verify any identified rights to a water supply. If the LADWP has not received water in prior years as described in CWC Section 10910 (e) or if groundwater is a source of supply as described in CWC Section 10910 (f), please comply with the requirements of those sections.

The Department of City Planning, which is preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project in accordance with CEQA, requests that the water supply assessment include a discussion of whether LADWP’s public water system’s total projected water supplies available during normal, single dry, and multiple dry water years will meet the projected water demand associated with the Project, in addition to LADWP’s public water system’s existing and planned future uses, including agricultural and manufacturing uses, pursuant to CWC Section 10910 (c)(3).

Project Location

The Project Site consists of 29 individual parcels across four City blocks in the Hollywood Community of the City of Los Angeles. The approximately 8.0-acre (348,419-square-foot) Project Site is generally bounded by Selma Avenue to the north; the Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church and School to the east; Sunset Boulevard to the south; and Highland Avenue to the west. The Project Site is currently developed with various uses including 84 multi-family residential dwelling units; one- and two-story structures used for commercial office and retail uses; and surface parking lots. Existing on-site uses include the Crossroads of the World complex (Crossroads of the World), which includes low-density commercial and office uses. Intermittent landscaping is dispersed throughout the Project Site and generally consists of ornamental trees and shrubs.

Project Description

The Project would remove all existing on-site uses except Crossroads of the World, which would be rehabilitated and converted back to retail/restaurant uses. Crossroads of the World would be integrated into a new mixed-use development comprised of eight new buildings housing residential, hotel, commercial/retail, office, and restaurant uses. Upon Project build-out, the Project (including existing uses to be retained) would include approximately 950 residential units, 308 hotel rooms, 95,000


of 8813

Mr. James McDaniel, Chief Operating Officer—Water System LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER March 31, 2016 – Page 3 square feet of office uses, and 185,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, totaling approximately 1,432,500 square feet of floor area. Approximately 83,200 square feet of the proposed retail area would consist of restaurant uses, with a maximum total of 3,037 seats. Building heights would range from 3 to 32 floors with a maximum building height of approximately 402 feet above grade. New, below-grade parking would be provided for all portions of the Project with a maximum of five levels of subterranean parking. In total, the Project would provide approximately 2,596 vehicular parking spaces. A conceptual site plan is attached as part of the Notice of Preparation.

The Project would include open space and green space consisting of a series of integrated walkways that would connect the dynamic mixed-use district created by the Project with the Hollywood neighborhood. Proposed additional landscaped public walkways would also promote access and connectivity to and through the Project Site from Sunset Boulevard, Las Palmas Avenue, Selma Avenue, and McCadden Place. In addition, the Project would also include active and passive recreational spaces including roofdecks and pools, community rooms and recreational facilities, courtyards, landscaped gardens, and common open space with gathering and seating areas. In total, approximately 31,184 square feet of the open space provided would consist of landscaped surface area.

Existing Water Consumption

As discussed above, the Project Site is currently developed with various uses including 84 multi-family residential dwelling units; one- and two-story structures used for commercial/retail and office uses; and surface parking lots. Existing on-site uses include a total of approximately 172,573 square feet of floor area. As shown in Table 1 on page 4, the Project Site currently generates a water demand of approximately 20,000 gallons per day.

Forecast of Project Water Demand

Table 2 on page 4 provides the estimated water demand forecast for the Project using the City’s Bureau of Sanitation standard factors for wastewater generation. As shown in Table 2, the Project is estimated to result in a domestic water demand of approximately 266,800 gallons per day, which represents an increase of approximately 246,800 gallons per day compared to existing conditions.


of 8813

Mr. James McDaniel, Chief Operating Officer—Water System LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER March 31, 2016 – Page 4

Table 1 Existing Water Consumption

Land Use Floor Area

(sf) Water Demand

Ratea Demand

(gpd)

Office 79,107 120/ksf 9,493

Commercial/Retail 26,690 25/ksf 667 Restaurant 475

(24 seats)b 25/seat 600

Residential 66,301 (84 du)

110/duc 9,240

Total 20,000 a Based on sewage generation rates provided by the City of Los Angeles

Bureau of Engineering (2012). b Assumes 60 percent of the restaurant area is available for patrons with 12

square feet of space per patron. c Conservatively assumes rate for 1-bedroom units for all existing dwelling units.

Source: Eyestone Environmental, 2016.

Table 2 Proposed Water Consumption

Land Use Proposed

Development Water Demand

Ratea Demand

(gpd)

Office 95,000 sf 170 gpd/1,000 sf 16,150 Commercial/Retail 101,800 sf 25 gpd/1,000 sf 2,545 Restaurant 3,037 seats 30 gpd/seat 91,110

Residential Studio 323 du 75 gpd/du 24,225

Residential 1-Bedroom 146 du 110 gpd/du 16,060 Residential 2-Bedroom 291 du 150 gpd/du 43,650

Residential 3-Bedroom 190 du 190 gpd/du 36,100 Hotel 308 rm 120 gpd/rm 36,960

Total 266,800

Net New Water Demand (Proposed - Existing) 246,800 a Based on sewage generation rates provided by the City of Los Angeles Bureau of

Sanitation (2012).

Source: Eyestone Environmental, 2016.


of 8813

Mr. James McDaniel, Chief Operating Officer—Water System LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER March 31, 2016 – Page 5

To further assist LADWP in the preparation of the Project’s WSA, the Project would also include up to 12 outdoor swimming pools (not associated with a gym or health club). A copy of the Project’s Notice of Preparation is also provided as Attachment B to this letter.

Project Conformance with Existing Zoning and the General Plan

The Project Site is located within the planning boundary of the Hollywood Community Plan (Community Plan), which was adopted in December 1988. The Project Site is designated as Regional Center Commercial by the Community Plan, which corresponds with the C2 (Commercial), C4 (Commercial), RAS4 (Residential/Accessory), R5 (Multiple Dwelling Residential), P (Automobile Parking—Surface and Underground), and PB (Parking Building) zones in the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC). The Project Site is zoned C4-2D (Commercial, Height District 2 with Development Limitation) and C4-2D-SN (Commercial, Height District 2 with Development Limitation, Signage Supplemental Use District). With some limitations (as identified in the LAMC), the C4 zone permits any land use permitted in the C2 zone, which in turn permits any land use permitted in the C1.5 and C1 zones. The Commercial zones permit a wide array of land uses such as retail stores, offices, hotels, schools, parks, and theaters. The C4 zone also permits any land use permitted in the R4 (Multiple Residential) zone, which includes one-family dwellings, two-family dwellings, apartment houses, multiple dwellings, and home occupations at a maximum density of 108 dwelling units per acre (a minimum lot area of 400 sf per dwelling unit). The C4 zone also permits residential development at the density permitted in the R5 zone (a maximum density of 217 dwelling units per acre, based on a minimum lot area of 200 square feet per dwelling unit) when a mix of commercial and residential uses is being developed, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.22.A.18(a). Height District 2 within the C4 zone does not impose a height limitation and has a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 6:1. The Development “D” Limitation in the zoning prefix indicates that development shall not exceed a FAR of 2:1 and 3:1 unless certain approvals are received. The Project would include uses that are compatible with the existing land use designation set forth in the Community Plan. However, the Project requests a height district change from 2D to 2 pursuant to LAMC Section 12.32 in order to allow development of the Project with an FAR of 4.7 averaged across the Project Site. Therefore, while the Project does generally conform to the uses permitted by the General Plan and Community Plan for the Project Site, the Project would generally not conform to the intensity of uses permitted by the LAMC without a land use entitlement to permit deviations from the LAMC.

Approvals required for the Project would include, but may not be limited to:

Zone and Height District change from C4-2D and C4-2D-SN to C4-2 and C4-2-SN;


of 8813


of 8813

October 22, 2015

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING CASE NO.: ENV-2015-2026-EIR PROJECT NAME: Crossroads Hollywood PROJECT APPLICANT: CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV, LLC PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1540–1552 Highland Avenue; 6700–6760 Selma Avenue; 6663–6675 Selma Avenue; 1543–1553 McCadden Place; 1542–1546 McCadden Place; 1501–1573 Las Palmas Avenue; 1500–1570 Las Palmas Avenue; 1600–1608 Las Palmas Avenue; 6665–6713½ Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, 90028 COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA: Hollywood COUNCIL DISTRICT: 13 - Mitch O'Farrell DUE DATE FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS: 4:00 p.m., November 23, 2015 SCOPING MEETING: November 14, 2015. See more information below. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15082, once the Lead Agency decides an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for a project, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) describing the project and its potential environmental effects shall be prepared. You are being notified of the City of Los Angeles’ intent, as Lead Agency, to prepare an EIR for this Project, which is located in an area of interest to you and/or the organization or agency you represent. This EIR will be prepared by outside consultants and submitted to the Department of City Planning, Environmental Analysis Section, for independent review and certification. The Department of City Planning requests your comments as to the scope and content of the EIR. Comments must be submitted in writing pursuant to directions below. If you represent an agency, the City is seeking comments as to the scope and content of the environmental information in the document which is germane to your agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with the Proposed Project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the Project.




RENEE DAKE WILSON



SAMANTHA MILLMAN DANA M. PERLMAN

MARTA SEGURA -

JAMES K. WILLIAMS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II

(213) 978-1300


ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR


MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE

DIRECTOR (213) 978-1271



FAX: (213) 978-1275

INFORMATION



of 8813

A Scoping Meeting will be held to receive input from the public as to what areas the EIR should study. No decisions about the Project are made at the Scoping Meeting. The project description, location, and the potential environmental effects identified thus far are set forth in this document. Also included below are the date, time, and location of the Scoping Meeting that will be held in order to solicit input regarding the content of the Draft EIR. The Scoping Meeting is in an open house format. THIS IS NOT THE REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING FOR MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLEMENT REQUESTS which will be scheduled after the completion of the EIR. The environmental file is available for review at the Department of City Planning, 200 North Spring Street, Room 750, Los Angeles, CA 90012. A copy of the Initial Study prepared for the Project is not attached but may be viewed online at http://planning.lacity.org by clicking on the “Environmental Review” tab, then “Notice of Preparation & Public Scoping Meetings”. PROJECT LOCATION: The Project Site consists of 29 individual parcels across four City blocks and is generally bounded by Selma Avenue to the north; the Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church and School to the east; Sunset Boulevard to the south; and Highland Avenue to the west. The Project Site includes the Crossroads of the World complex (Crossroads of the World), which is a designated City Cultural-Historic Monument (Monument #134) and also appears on the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historic Resources. Crossroads of the World includes low-density commercial and office uses. Other uses at the Project Site include two residential duplexes; three two-story, multi-family apartment buildings housing a total of 80 dwelling units; one- and two-story structures used for commercial office and retail uses; and surface parking lots. The surrounding area is urbanized and includes historic and modern low- to high-rise buildings occupied by neighborhood-serving commercial uses, tourist and entertainment-related uses, offices, hotels, educational institutions, and single-family and multi-family residences.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV, LLC, the Project Applicant, proposes to redevelop the Project Site with a cohesive, mixed-use development that blends the distinguishing character of Crossroads of the World with a collection of new buildings of modern design and creates an open-air pedestrian district with a mix of shopping, dining, and entertainment uses. The Project would retain, preserve, and rehabilitate Crossroads of the World and remove all other existing uses on the Project Site, including surface parking lots and approximately 86,947 square feet of existing floor area consisting of 84 residential units (including 80 multi-family dwelling units and two duplexes) and commercial/retail and office uses. The Project would integrate Crossroads of the World into a new, mixed-use development that would include eight new mixed-use buildings with residential, hotel, commercial/retail, office, entertainment, and restaurant uses. Upon build-out, the Project (including existing uses to be retained) would include approximately 1,432,000 square feet of floor area consisting of 950 residential units, 308 hotel rooms, approximately 95,000 square feet of office uses, and approximately 185,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses. The proposed floor area ratio (FAR) would be approximately 4.69:1 averaged across the Project Site. Building heights would range from 3 to 32 floors with a maximum building height of approximately 402 feet above grade.

REQUESTED PERMITS/APPROVALS: The City of Los Angeles has the principal responsibility for approving the Project. Approvals required for development of the Project may include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Zone and Height District change from C4-2D and C4-2D-SN to C4-2 and C4-2-SN;


of 8813

(2) Site plan review;

(3) Major Development Project Conditional Use Permit pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24.U.14;

(4) Master Conditional Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages and for live entertainment in connection with a total of 22 alcohol-related uses associated with the Project’s proposed hotel and commercial uses;

(5) Conditional Use Permit to permit floor area and density averaging in a unified development;

(6) Zone variance to permit outdoor eating areas above the ground floor; and

(7) Other discretionary and ministerial permits and approvals that may be deemed necessary, including but not limited to temporary street closure permits, grading permits, excavation permits, foundation permits, and building permits.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Aesthetics (Visual Quality/Views and Light/Glare/Shading); Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Geology and Soils; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services (Fire, Police, Schools, Parks, Libraries); Recreation; Traffic, Access, and Parking; and Utilities (Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, and Energy). PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING: A public scoping meeting in an open house format will be held to receive public comments regarding the scope and content of the environmental analysis to be included in the Draft EIR. City staff, environmental consultants and project representatives will be available, but no formal presentation is scheduled. You may stop by at any time between 1:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. to view materials, ask questions, and provide comments. The Department of City Planning encourages all interested individuals and organizations to attend this meeting. The location, date, and time of the public scoping meeting for this Project are as follows: Date: Saturday, November 14, 2015 Time: 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M.

Arrive any time between 1:00 P.M.—3:00 P.M. to speak one-on-one with City staff and Project consultants.

Location: Hollywood Constituent Center (Large Conference Room) 6501 Fountain Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90028 The enclosed materials reflect the scope of the project (subject to change). The Department of City Planning welcomes and will consider all written comments regarding potential environmental impacts of the project and issues to be addressed in the EIR. Written comments must be submitted to this office by 4:00 p.m., November 23, 2015. Written comments will also be accepted at the public scoping meeting described above.


of 8813

Please direct your responses to:

Mail: Alejandro Huerta Environmental Analysis Section Department of City Planning 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Fax: (213) 978-1343

Email: [email protected]

ACCOMODATIONS: As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate on the bases of disability. The scoping meeting facility and its parking are wheelchair accessible.

Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or services may be provided upon request. Other services, such as translation between English and other languages, may also be provided upon request.

To ensure availability or services, please make your request no later than three working days (72 hours) prior to the scoping meeting by calling Darlene Navarrete at (213) 978-1332.

Michael J. LoGrande Director of C~nning

Enclosures:

Project Location Map Conceptual Site Plan 500-foot Radius Map Scoping Meeting Location Map


of 8813




RENEE DAKE WILSON



SAMANTHA MILLMAN DANA M. PERLMAN

MARTA SEGURA -

JAMES K. WILLIAMS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II

(213) 978-1300


ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR


MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE

DIRECTOR (213) 978-1271



FAX: (213) 978-1275

INFORMATION


22 de Octubre, 2015

AVISO DE PREPARACIÓN DE UN INFORME DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL

Y REUNIÓN PÚBLICA NUMERO DE CASO.: ENV-2015-2026-EIR NOMBRE DE PROYECTO: Crossroads Hollywood CANDIDATE PARA EL PROYECTO: CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV, LLC UBICACIÓN DEL PROYECTO/DIRECCIÓN: 1540–1552 Highland Avenue; 6700–6760 Selma Avenue; 6663–6675 Selma Avenue; 1543–1553 McCadden Place; 1542–1546 McCadden Place; 1501–1573 Las Palmas Avenue; 1500–1570 Las Palmas Avenue; 1600–1608 Las Palmas Avenue; 6665–6713½ Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, 90028 ÁREA DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE LA COMUNIDAD: Hollywood DISTRITO DE CONSEJO: 13—Mitch O’Farrell FECHA DE VENCIMIENTO PARA COMENTARIOS PÚBLICOS: 4:00 P.M., Viernes, 23 de Noviembre, 2015 REUNIÓN PÚBLICA: 14 de Noviembre, 2015. Ver más información abajo. De conformidad con la Ley de Calidad Ambiental de California (CEQA) Directrices Sección 15082, una vez que el organismo director decide que un Informe de Impacto Ambiental (EIR) se requiere para un proyecto, un Aviso de Preparación (NOP) que describe el proyecto y sus posibles efectos ambientales deberá prepararse. Se le ha notificado de la intencion de la Ciudad de Los Ángeles, como organismo director, para preparar un EIR para este proyecto, que se encuentra en un área de interés para usted y/o la organización o agencia que usted representa. Este EIR será preparado por consultores externos y presentado al Departamento de Planificación de la Ciudad (The Planning Department), Sección de Análisis Ambiental, para su revisión y certificación independiente.

El Departamento de Planificación de la Ciudad solicita sus comentarios sobre el alcance y el contenido del EIR. Los comentarios deben ser presentadas por escrito de conformidad con las instrucciones de abajo. Si representas a una agencia, la Ciudad está buscando comentarios sobre el alcance y contenido de la información ambiental en el documento que es pertinente a las responsabilidades estatutarias de su agencia en relación con el proyecto propuesto. Su agencia tendrá que utilizar el EIR preparado por nuestra agencia al considerar su permiso u otra aprobación del Proyecto.


of 8813

Una reunión publica se llevará a cabo para recibir la opinión del público en cuanto a qué áreas del EIR debe estudiar. Ninguna decisión sobre el proyecto se realizara en la reunión publica. La descripción del proyecto, la ubicación del proyecto, y los posibles efectos ambientales identificados hasta ahora se exponen en este documento. También se incluye a continuación la fecha, hora y lugar de la reunión publica que se realizará con el fin de solicitar información sobre el contenido del Proyecto de EIR.

La reunión publica está en un formato de casa abierta. ESTO NO ES LA AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA QUE SE REQUIERE PARA LAS PETICIONES derecho Código Municipal que se pueden programar después de la finalización del EIR. El archivo del medio ambiente está disponible para su revisión en el Departamento de Planificación de la Ciudad, 200 North Spring Street, Room 750, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Una copia del Estudio Inicial preparado para el Proyecto no está conectado, pero se puede ver en línea en http://planning.lacity.org haciendo clic en la ficha, a continuación, “Aviso de Preparación y alcance público Reuniones” “Revisión Ambiental.”

UBICACIÓN DEL PROYECTO: El Sitio del Proyecto consiste de 29 parcelas individuales a través de cuatro bloques de la ciudad y está limitada generalmente por Selma Avenue hacia el norte; el Santísimo Sacramento Iglesia católica y escuela hacia el este; Sunset Boulevard hacia el sur; y Highland Avenue hacia el oeste. El Sitio del Proyecto el complejo Crossroads of the World (Crossroads of the World), que es una designada Ciudad Cultural-Histórico Monument (Monumento # 134) y también aparece en el Registro Nacional de Lugares Históricos y el Registro de Recursos Históricos de California. Crossroads of the World incluye utiliza de baja densidad de oficinas comerciales. Otros usos en el Sitio del Proyecto incluyen dos dúplex residenciales; tres de dos pisos, edificios de apartamentos multifamiliares que albergan un total de 80 unidades de vivienda; estructuras de uno y dos pisos utilizados para la oficina comercial y minorista usos; y estacionamientos de superficie. Los alrededores son urbanizados e incluye baja histórica y moderna de edificios de gran altura ocupados por usos vecinales que sirven comerciales, turismo y usos relacionados con el entretenimiento, oficinas, hoteles, instituciones educativas, y unifamiliares y multifamiliares residencias.

DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROYECTO: CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV, LLC, el solicitante del proyecto, se propone reconstruir el lugar del proyecto con un desarrollo coherente, de uso mixto que combina el carácter distintivo de la Crossroads of the World con una colección de nuevos edificios de diseño moderno y crea una zona peatonal al aire libre con una mezcla de tiendas, restaurantes, y usos de ocio. El Proyecto conservaría, preservar y rehabilitar Crossroads of the World y eliminar todas las otras aplicaciones existentes en el lugar del proyecto, incluyendo los estacionamientos de superficie y aproximadamente 86,947 pies cuadrados de área de piso existente que consta de 84 unidades residenciales (incluyendo 80 unidades familiares de viviendas colectivas y dos dúplex) y comercial/comercial y de oficinas utiliza. El Proyecto integraría Crossroads of the World en un nuevo desarrollo de uso mixto que incluirá ocho nuevos edificios de uso mixto con residencial, hotelero, comercial/minorista, oficina, entretenimiento, y los usos de restaurantes. Tras la acumulación de salir, el Proyecto (incluyendo los usos que deben conservarse existente) incluiría aproximadamente 1.432 millones de pies cuadrados de superficie que consta de 950 unidades residenciales, 308 habitaciones de hotel, aproximadamente 95,000 pies cuadrados de usos de oficina, y aproximadamente 185,000 pies cuadrados de comercial/usos minoristas. La proporción de área de suelo propuesto (FAR) sería de aproximadamente 4.69:1 en promedio a través del Sitio del Proyecto. Alturas de construcción oscilarían entre 3 y 32 pisos con una altura máxima de edificación de la calificación de aproximadamente 402 pies por encima.


of 8813

PERMISOS SOLICITADOS: La ciudad de Los Ángeles tiene la principal responsabilidad de aprobar el proyecto. Aprobaciones requeridas para el desarrollo del proyecto pueden incluir, pero no se limitan a, lo siguiente:

1. Zona y el cambio Distrito Altura desde C4-2D y C4-2D-SN de C4-2 y C4-2-SN;

2. La revisión del plan del sitio;

3. Proyecto de Desarrollo Major Permiso de Uso Condicional de conformidad con LAMC Sección 12.24.U.14;

4. Maestro Permiso de Uso Condicional para la venta de bebidas alcohólicas y de entretenimiento en vivo en conexión con un total de 22 usos relacionados con el alcohol asociados con hotel propuesto del Proyecto y los usos comerciales;

5. Permiso de Uso Condicional para permitir Superficie y promedio de densidad en un desarrollo unificado;

6. Zona de varianza para permitir zonas para comer al aire libre por encima de la planta baja; y

7. Otros permisos y aprobaciones discrecionales y ministeriales que se consideren necesarias, incluyendo pero no limitado a los permisos de la calle de cierre temporal, permisos de clasificación, permisos de excavación, cimentación, permisos y licencias de construcción.

FACTORES AMBIENTALES POTENCIALMENTE AFECTADAS: Estética (Visual Calidad/Puntos de vista y la luz/deslumbramiento/sombra); Calidad del aire; Recursos Culturales; Geología y Suelos; Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero; Peligros y materiales peligrosos; Hidrología y Calidad del Agua; Uso y Ordenación del Territorio; Ruido; Población y Vivienda; Servicios Públicos (bomberos, policía, escuelas, parques, bibliotecas); Recreación; Tráfico, Acceso y estacionamiento; y los servicios (agua, aguas residuales, residuos sólidos y energía).

REUNIÓN PÚBLICA: Una reunión pública en un formato de puertas abiertas se llevará a cabo para recibir comentarios del público sobre el alcance y el contenido del análisis ambiental que se incluirán en el Proyecto EIR. Personal de la Ciudad, consultores ambientales y representantes del proyecto estará disponible, pero no hay presentación formal está programada. Usted puede parar en cualquier momento entre la 1:00 P.M. y 3:00 P.M. para ver los materiales, hacer preguntas, y proporcionar comentarios. El Departamento de Planificación Urbana (The Department of City Planning) alienta a todos los individuos y organizaciones interesadas a asistir a esta reunión. El lugar, fecha y hora de la reunión pública para este proyecto son los siguientes:

Fecha: Sabado, 14 de Noviembre, 2015

Horario: 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. Llegar a cualquier hora entre 1:00 P.M.–3:00 P.M. para hablar de

uno-a-uno con personal de la Ciudad y los consultores del proyecto.

Lugar: Hollywood Constituent Center (Gran sala de conferencias) 6501 Fountain Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90028


of 8813

Los materiales adjuntos reflejan el alcance del proyecto (sujeto a cambio). EI Departamento de Planificacion (The Department of City Planning) da la bienvenida y tendni en cuenta todas las observaciones por escrito acerca de los posibles impactos ambientales del proyecto y las cuestiones que se abordanin en el EIR. Los comentarios escritos deben presentarse a esta ofieina antes de las 4:00 de la tarde, 23 de Noviembre de 2015. Los comentarios escritos tambien senin aceptadas en la reunion publica se ha descrito anteriormente.

Por favor, dirija sus respuestas a:

Alejandro Huerta Seccion de Amilisis Ambiental (Environmental Analysis Section) Departamento de Planificacion Urbana (The Department of City Planning) 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Fax: (213) 978-1343

Email: alej [email protected]

ALOJAMIENTOS: Como entidad cubierta bajo el Titulo II de la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades, la Ciudad de Los Angeles no discrimina sobre la base de la discapacidad. La sala de reuniones de alcance y su aparcamiento para minusvaIidos.

Interpretes Lenguaje de signos, dispositivos de ayuda auditiva, u otras ayudas auxiliares y/o servicios pueden ser disponibles bajo peticion. Otros servicios, como la traduccion entre Ingles y otros idiomas, tambien pueden ser disponibles bajo peticion.

Para garantizar la disponibilidad de servicios, por favor hacer su solicitud a mas tardar tres dias (72 horas) antes de la reunion de alcance llamando a Darlene Navarrete al (213) 978-1332.

EIR Unit, Environmental Analysis Section

Enclosures: . Mapa de Ubicacion de el Proyecto Plano del Sitio Conceptual Mapa de Propiedad de 500 Pies de Radio Mapa de Ubicacion de la Reunion Publica


of 8813

Vine

Hollywood

Selma

Santa Monica

Hig

hlan

d

Ora

nge

Sunset

Hawthorn

De Longpre

Fountain

Lexington

La B

rea

Cah

ueng

a

Wilc

ox

Sch

rade

r

Mc

Cad

den

Mc

Cad

den

Las

Pal

mas

Che

roke

e

Sew

ard

Bro

nson

Gow

er

Col

e

Franklin

Bea

chw

ood

Cah

ueng

a

Franklin

Project Site

101

101

170

170

2

Source: LA County GIS; Eyestone Environmental, 2015.

Project Location MapMapa de Ubicacion de el Proyecto

0 0.50.25Miles

N

NOT TO SCALE

405

101

91

1182

710

1

1

405

10

105

405

210

110

605

5

5

San Pedro

Encino Sherman Oaks

Van Nuys

Chatsworth

Carson

Santa Monica Mtns.

San Gabr ie l Mtns.

GlendaleHollywood

Santa Monica

Manhattan Beach

Redondo Beach

Torrance

Long Beach

Malibu

Woodland Hills

Simi Valley

Agoura Hills

Los Angeles

Pasadena

Project Site


of 8813

SL E

L

TE

TR

EE

CE

BANQUET

SE

T

WC

TE

V SE CE

PREFUNCTION

TE

E

WC

TE

3 MEALRESTAURANT

V

TE

VESTIBULEE

HS

EE

EE EVTR

LOBBYSE E E

SKIDMORE OWINGS & MERRILL LLP /

9/9/2015

HARRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC 6701 SUNSET BLVDLOS ANGELES, HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA

8

0’ 32’ 64’ 96’ 128’ 192’

SCALE 1/32”=1’ CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

N

HOTEL

*CROSSROADS OF THE WORLD

**BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE APPROXIMATE

PRIMARY BUILDING USES**

EXISTING*

GROUND FLOOR RETAIL

RESIDENTIAL

PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY

DEVELOPMENT PARCEL BOUNDARY

OFFICE

A1308 HOTEL KEYS409 CARS BELOW GRADE348,500 SF HOTEL10,500 SF RETAIL31 FLOORS

B1190 CONDO UNITS219,000 SF RESIDENTIAL15,500 SF RETAIL30 FLOORS

B270 RENTAL UNITS52,500 SF RESIDENTIAL12,000 SF RETAIL6 FLOORS

B3489 RENTAL UNITS358,000 SF RESIDENTIAL11,000 SF RETAIL32 FLOORS

B4 123 RENTAL UNITS114,000 SF RESIDENTIAL20,000 SF RETAIL6 FLOORS + MEZZANINE

C1 50,000 SF OFFICE27,000 SF RETAIL3 FLOORS

C245,000 SF OFFICE16,500 SF RETAIL4 FLOORS

EXISTING CROSSROADS68,000 SF RETAIL2 FLOORS

D1 78 RENTAL UNITS60,500 SF RESIDENTIAL4,500 SF RETAIL6 FLOORS

DEVELOPMENT PARCEL A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL B

DEVELOPMENT PARCEL C

DEVELOPMENT PARCEL D

SUNSET BLVD

SELMA AVE

N L

AS

PA

LM

AS

AV

E

N L

AS

PA

LM

AS

AV

E

N M

CC

AD

DE

N P

L

MC

CA

DD

EN

PL

AC

E

HIG

HL

AN

D A

VE

A1

B1

B2

B3

B4

C1

C2

D1

Source: Skidmore Owings & Merril LLP and Rios Clementi Hale Studios, 2015.

Conceptual Site PlanPlano del Sitio Conceptual


of 8813


of 8813

Vine

Hollywood

Selma

Santa Monica

Hig

hlan

d

Ora

nge

Sunset

Hawthorn

De Longpre

Fountain Fountain

Lexington

La B

rea

Cah

ueng

a

Wilc

oxW

ilcox

Sch

rade

r

Mc

Cad

den

Mc

Cad

den

Las

Pal

mas

Che

roke

e

Sew

ard

Bro

nson

Gow

er

Col

e

Franklin

Bea

chw

ood

Cah

ueng

a

Franklin

Project Site

Scoping Meeting Location(Ubicacion de la Reunion Publica):Hollywood Constituent Center(Large Conference Room)6501 Fountain AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90028Saturday, November 14, 20151:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M.

101

101

170

170

2

Source: LA County GIS; Eyestone Environmental, 2015.

Scoping Meeting Location MapMapa de Ubicacion de la Reunion Publica

0 0.50.25Miles

N


of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270-000002Owner: Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>Filename: image002.jpgLast Modified: Fri Apr 15 10:03:24 PDT 2016

of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270-000003Owner: Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>Filename: image003.jpgLast Modified: Fri Apr 15 10:03:24 PDT 2016

of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270-000004Owner: Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>Filename: Original_WSA_Receipt.pdfLast Modified: Fri Apr 15 10:03:24 PDT 2016

of 8813

Original_WSA_Receipt.pdf for Printed Item: 1058 ( Attachment 4 of 4)

of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>; Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: FW: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Today at 10am

fyi

From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:46 AMTo: Pettijohn, David; Kwan, Delon; Falcon, Penny; Villegas, Rafael; Castro, ArtSubject: FW: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Today at 10am

FYIPlease provide status after BAR to me so that I may move forward with assembling each of your boardpackages for the board meeting.Yvonne

From: Flores, VivianSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:43 AMTo: Rodriguez, Arlene; Gonzalez, Lupe; Rayas-glen, Yvonne; Spacht, JulieCc: Kay, MariaSubject: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Today at 10am

Attached is today's BAR agenda. Please forward to those attending today. Marty is still on vacation.Also, be sure to follow-up following the BAR on your items. The turn-around for GM approval isimmediately following BAR. Please provide the status after BAR to me.

Thanks,

Vivian Flores(213) 367-1016Utility Executive Secretary for Martin L. AdamsLos Angeles Department of Water and Power

From: Baule, SteveSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:56 PMTo: Wright, David; Santilli, Ann; SUTLEY, NANCY H; Lipa, Guy; Williams, Gwendolyn; Wong, Gary;Adams, Martin; Chung, Timothy; Moschos, Barbara; Bigasin, Vickie; Yancy, Winifred; Ramallo, Joseph;Sedlacek, Mark; Tom, Richard; Guglielmo, Neil; Lampe, Matt; Peltola, Jeff; Edwards, Marcie; Webster,Michael; Kendall, Andrew; Naglich, Frank C.; Gross, Aaron; Feldmeier, Lou; Townsend, Mark;Brajevich, Joseph; Rosenblatt, EricCc: Rodriguez, Susie; Stallworth, Shelly; Sigala, Patricia; Zerrudo, Lourdes; White, Glory; Flores,

Date: Wed Jul 20 2016 09:43:29 PDTAttachments: BAR for August 2 2016 Board Meeting.docx

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.499699

of 8813

Vivian; Kay, Maria; Sternquist, Darlene; Sindayen, Lucina; Shirakawa, Susan; Bogin, LaTanya;Tesseneer, Silvia; Soto-Herrera, Nancy; Henderson, Jennifer; Mitchell, Chante; Ma, Joanne;Hovhanisian, IzabellaSubject: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Tomorrow 10am

Attached is the draft Agenda for the August 2nd Board Meeting. The Board Agenda Review Meetingwill be at 10am tomorrow (7/20).

ThanksSteve

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.499699-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: BAR for August 2 2016 Board Meeting.docxLast Modified: Wed Jul 20 09:43:29 PDT 2016

of 8813

Page |

Draft Board Agenda for August 2, 2016

This document is intended solely for informational purposes to advise you in advance of certain items that may be coming before the Board. If you would like an advance informational briefing, please let me know and we will arrange one for you in conformance with the Brown Act.

To assure compliance with the Brown Act, please do not hit “Reply All” or discuss the matters with another Commissioner. In further compliance with the Brown Act, please refrain from expressing any position/view on the item, and limit your response solely to whether or not you would like an informational briefing before the matter comes to the Board for action.

And of course, this information is preliminary; the final agenda may be different.

Topics for Discussion

A. POLICY DISCUSSION

TBD

B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS

Update on LAUSD Bucket Brigade Challenge (deferred from the July 19, 2016 Meeting)Overview of LADWP Real Estate Program (deferred from the July 19, 2016 Meeting)

Board Items

Proposed Agenda Items 1 POWER: Contract 7652 for 525kV for Single-Phase Shunt Reactors for Various Switching Stations -

Taikai Electric, Inc.

This is a one-time purchase for an amount not to exceed $2,119,360 (budgeted).

This will furnish and deliver four 525-kV, single-phase shunt reactors for various switching stations.

The single-phase shunt reactors will replace failed reactors at McCullough and Marketplace Switching Stations, which were installed in 1973 and 1994, respectively. It is crucial for LADWP’s Power System to consume reactive power when the system is lightly loaded to avoid overvoltage. The three new single-phase, 70-MVAR SRs for McCullough and one new single-phase, 58.3-MVAR for Marketplace will absorb much of the significant reactive power and improve the system voltage and stability during off-peak time.

Competitive bid. A total of 11 bids received. 2 POWER: Contract 7615 for Generators Step-up Transformers for Castaic Power Plant Units 1 and 2 -

Taikai Electric, Inc.

This is a one-time purchase for an amount not to exceed $2,058,550 (budgeted).

BAR for August 2 2016 Board Meeting.docx for Printed Item: 1063 ( Attachment 1 of 1)

of 8813

Page |

This will furnish and deliver two generator step-up transformers for Castaic Power Plant Units 1 and 2. The existing transformers at the Castaic Power Plant were installed in 1971. The contract will be used to replace these aging and high-maintenance transformers. Generator step-up transformers are used to step-up the voltage and are essential to supplying power generated from Units 1 and 2 to the power grid. An unplanned outage due to the transformers failing could result in a loss of power generation for up to two years due to the long lead time of procuring transformers of this size.

Competitive bid. A total of 11 bids received. 3 POWER: Contract 541 for 38kV SF6 Insulated Swithgear - OneSource Distributors

Period of one year with two one-year renewal options, for an estimated expenditure of $57,186,756 and an amount not to exceed $71,483,445 (budgeted).

This will furnish and deliver 38kV SF6 Insulated Switchgear. The 38kv SF6 insulated switchgear will be used on LADWP’s power distribution system. The switchgear will be used to protect transformers, clear faults downstream, de-energize equipment (allowing work to be done), switch from a normal to an emergency circuit, and serve as an intertie switch for customers having their own cogeneration plant. These switchgears are easy to operate. This minimizes downtime duration and limits the disruption in service to customers.

Competitive bid. A total of 3 bids received.

4 POWER: Contract 7453 for Concrete Saw Trailers with TriVan Truck Body LLC

Amount not to exceed $399,982 (budgeted), one-time purchase.

This is to purchase five concrete saw trailers. One trailer will replace an aging trailer that will be sold at auction with estimated return on investment of $25,000. Four new trailers will be added to the fleet. The trailers will be used by various LADWP crews within the Power System for cutting concrete and asphalt pavement for repairs or new construction activities where concrete and asphalt pavement cutting is required. These trailers provide for transporting cutting equipment and supplies, storage and equipment operating needs such as a water cooling system for cutting activities and generator power.

Competitive bid with only 1 bid received. LADWP contacted relevant firms that did not submit bids – one stated that the requirements were beyond their capabilities, another stated that they could not get the right pricing and a final stated that they were working on other projects and requirements were not their usual business.

5 POWER: Contract Nos. 7585A and 7585B for Forklifts - Southern California Material Handling and Yale Chase Equipment and Services

One-Time Purchase and a total amount not-to-exceed $1,765,728 (budgeted).

Two Agreements for sixteen forklifts, including service, repair and operator training. Eleven forklifts will replace aging forklifts that have exceeded their service life, and will be sent to salvage for


of 8813

Page |

auction. Five forklifts will be added to the fleet.

These forklifts are used by LADWP personnel for material handling, construction, maintenance, and emergency response activities throughout the service territory.


6 POWER: Amendment 1 to Contract Nos. 626A and 626B for Bare Rental of Tanks, Pumps, Pipes, Fittings, and Accessories - BakerCorp and Rain for Rent, Inc.

Amendment to Contract 626A increases contract limit total by $2,954,886 to $4,500,000; and increases Contract 626B limit total by $2,500,954 to $3,700,000 (budgeted). There is no change to the duration of the contract.

These two Amendments are to add funds to continue services for the rental of tanks, pumps, fittings and accessories on an as-needed basis for the daily construction and maintenance activities of Water and Power System projects.

The additional funds will primarily enable the Water and Power System to continue fulfilling their operational objectives to minimize the discharge of any water generated by construction, operations, and maintenance activities to the Los Angeles storm drain systems by capturing, transporting, filtering, and recycling as much construction water as possible. These efforts require the use of tanks to store water, pumps and pipes to transport the water, and filtration equipment to clean the waters in accordance with current permit requirements and regulations so the water can be transferred to sewer systems, spreading basins, or other uses (i.e. water recycling and irrigation).

Last year there were new requirements to reclaim or re-use construction water and new water well installations. Also in effort to resolve the recent Aliso Canyon gas storage limitations, the Power System used these contracts to process, filter and store diesel for the in-basin generating stations. Therefore, the use of rental tanks, pumps, pipes and accessories has significantly increased and was not anticipated in the original estimate.

7 WATER: Memorandum of Agreement with Council for Watershed Health

No Costs Associated with this Agreement.

The Agreement with LADWP and Council for Watershed Health will build and maintain a working partnership to support and foster sustainable watershed management practices in the City of Los Angeles.

This Agreement was created to facilitate high-level collaboration between LADWP and Council for Watershed Health with the aim of fostering a more sustainable Los Angeles, at no cost to LADWP.

The partnership will leverage the Council’s experience stakeholder engagement while working with government agencies, business partners, and academia to further the long-term sustainability objectives of LADWP’s Water System. Under the Agreement, LADWP and the Council for Watershed Health will work together to identify barriers and opportunities to develop a more robust local water


of 8813

Page |

supply, specifically focusing on increased stormwater capture as well as conservation. Ultimately, this exchange of ideas helps the two partners develop concepts for projects as well as policies, design criteria and guidance to increase the local water supply. It also enables both partners to effectively present proposed projects to stakeholder groups and enlist their support.

8 WATER: Water Supply Assessment for the Crossroads Hollywood Project

The CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV paid $17,000 to cover LADWP’s expenses for preparation of the Water Supply Assessment.

This Water Supply Assessment is for Crossroads Hollywood Project located within the Hollywood Community Plan area. LADWP staff determined the total net additional water demand for Proposed Project is 440 acre-feet per year (AFY) and has concluded this additional water demand can be accommodated. Proposed Project’s base water demand was further reduced by 116 AFY through implementation of the conservation ordinance and code requirements and an additional 10 AFY through the project implementing additional voluntarily conservation measures.

As required by the California State Water Code, the governing body of each public water system is required to make a determination on the Water Supply Assessment for major projects.

9 WATER: Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 47289-5 for eSTREAM Analysis Model with Watercourse Engineering, Inc.

Increase the not-to exceed amount from $150,000 to $400,000 and extend the term by five years for a cumulative term of eight years.

The Amendment is necessary to allow updates on eSTREAM, which assists in the development of the Mono Basin Operations Plan (MBOP) and the Annual Operations Plan as required by the 2013 Mono Basin Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement includes the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Mono Lake Committee, California Trout and LADWP

City Council Approval Required.

10 WATER: Contract No. 720 for Resilient-Seated Gate Valves With Clow Valve Company

Term of one year with two one-year renewal options for an estimated expenditure of $4,810,117 and for an amount not to exceed $6,012,647 (budgeted).

This will furnish and deliver on an as needed basis resilient-seated gate valves. This material will be used on new pipeline installations as well as replacement of existing damaged and leaking valves and pipe. The resilient-seated gate valves provide the ability to shut off water flow in mainlines, service lines, fire hydrant laterals, tank inlet/outlet lines, regulator stations, and as a replacement for old or damaged valves.

Competitive bid. A total of 8 bids received.11 COO: Optical Fiber Lease Agreement No. FO-800-03/2016 and Short Form IRU-01 Lease Agreement

No. FO-801-03/2016 with Beers Enterprises, LLC for Lease of LADWP Power Optical Fibers


of 8813

Page |

Term of five years and will generate $169,600 in revenue if the full term is realized.

This Agreement allows Beers Enterprises, LLC to use a small fraction of LADWP's excess fiber cable capacity for an initial term of three years with option to renew each year up to a total term of five years.

LADWP leases the excess fiber optic cable capacity to commercial businesses. A Master Agreement called the "Optical Fiber Lease Agreement" establishes contractual terms and conditions with each commercial fiber customer. A subordinate agreement to the Master Agreement, the Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) Agreement, is established for each individual fiber optic cable lease.

12 COO: Cooperative Purchasing Agreement No. 47413 for Professional Programming Services for MyDWP Employee Portal and FileNet Document and Records Management System With 3Di, Inc.

Term of the Agreement will be coterminous with the expiration of the Information Technology Agency contract, which expires on December 31, 2017, for an amount not to exceed $500,000 (budgeted).

The proposed Cooperative Purchasing Agreement is to furnish and deliver professional programming services to support and upgrade the MyDWP employee portal and the FileNet document and records management system. The expert programming and knowledge transfer to be provided will enable LADWP to complete the merger of all Intranet websites into MyDWP and assist in the upgrade and support of LADWP's document and records management system.

The Agreement is established through a cooperative purchasing agreement ("piggyback") with Information Technology Agency and 3Di Inc.

13 COO: Amendment No. 1 to increase the Maximum dollar limit of Contract No. 49254-5 for LADWP's Social Media Presence with Social Stream Media, LLC

Extension of 7 months and an increase in the maximum dollar limit from $135,000 to $189,012.

This Amendment will pay for services already received from August 21, 2015 through March 20, 2016. Amendment for payment of outstanding invoices which exceed the total contract amount and were incurred after the expiration of the contract period. The contractor’s specialized services were used in preparation for and in immediate response to public feedback during LADWP’s recently approved rates case.

Social Stream specializes in maximizing paid advertising and earned media reach on Facebook in addition to providing valuable services and staff training during the contract period. The contract with Social Stream was not promptly renewed due to competing priorities and a lack of support staff to monitor the contract and to follow-up on the contract renewal. The contract renewal period was during the height of the work being done to support the rates case, as well as carry out over one million dollars in advertising for water conservation due to the extreme drought.

14 COO: Contract No. 7454 for Aerial Boom Trucks - Los Angeles Truck Center, LLC


of 8813

Page |

One-time purchase of $11,736,108 (budgeted).

The contract is required to replace 29 older diesel powered trucks which will be sold at auction for approximately $435,000. The trucks being replaced are between 14 and 24 years old. Power Transmission and Distribution Division crews use these trucks for maintenance, repair, and construction activities throughout the LADWP service area. The trucks provide access to power transmission equipment located above ground level, such as on power poles, and for lifting transformers and other equipment and materials. Crews utilizing the trucks support normal and emergency operations for utility restoration, installation, maintenance, repair, and construction of LADWP infrastructures, including capital and regulatory projects.

Competitive bid. A total of 5 bids received.15 Sustainability: Sylmar Ground Return System Replacement Project in accordance with California

Environmental Quality Act

No approval of funding is required at this time. LADWP is responsible for 40% of the cost associated with the replacement project which is estimated to cost approximately $62,500,000. The project is budgeted for the fiscal years 2016/2017 through 2017/2018.

This resolution is to fulfill LADWP’s responsibilities under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prior to implementation of the proposed Sylmar Ground Return System Replacement Project.

The proposed Project would replace the existing marine facility of the Sylmar Ground Return System. The replacement facility would be located in the vicinity of the existing Sylmar Ground Return System marine facility in the Santa Monica Bay however, with a different alignment than the existing; it would serve the same purpose and function as the existing facility.

The Project is proposed to increase the reliability, stability of the power generation and delivery system for Southern California; to continue to meet current and projected demand for power in the region; and to help increase the available share of renewable resource energy of the Pacific Direct Current Intertie Transmission Line.

16 Retirement: Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendment to the Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan to Eliminate the Reserve for Investment Gains and Losses Account

The proposed Plan amendment is only an administrative change and will not have any financial impact. An actuarial study is not required because there is no impact to cost or benefits.

At its meeting on June 8, 2016, the LADWP’s Retirement Board adopted a Resolution to recommend that the Board of Water and Power Commissioners approve a Plan amendment to eliminate the Reserve for Investment Gains and Losses account.

The maintenance of the Reserve for Investment Gains and Losses account is inconsistent with the Retirement Board’s Investment Policy which provides investment managers full discretion over trading activities. The transfer of this account to the General Reserve account has become an accounting exercise only with the Reserve being maintained at $5.5 million since at least Fiscal Year 2001. The proposed Plan amendment establishes a change in recording of the investment gains and


of 8813

Page |

losses directly to the General Reserve Account for the Retirement Fund.

17 LEGAL: Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendment to the Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan to Correct Classes Eligible for Tier 1 Membership

An increase in LADWP’s Normal cost contribution rate of 10.38% of compensation. The additional LADWP Normal cost is approximately 0.43% of the estimated total LADWP contributions. The additional LADWP Normal contribution rate would be expected to continue for each year throughout these employees’ careers.

At its regular meeting on December 11, 2013, the LADWP’s Retirement Board adopted a Resolution to amend the Plan to establish Tier 2 benefits. As part of the Tier 2 provisions, employees in the classification of Utility Pre-Craft Trainee, who were ineligible for membership in the Plan on December 31, 2013, were provided eligibility for membership to Tier 1 rather than Tier 2. The Plan did not include the classes of Construction Electrical Helper and Construction Electrical Mechanic where were authorized to join Tier 1 upon qualification during the settlement discussion in the Romero lawsuit.

The proposed Plan amendment will add two classifications, Construction Electrical Helper and Construction Electrical Mechanic, for eligibility to Tier 1 membership upon qualification.

Item presented to the Board at the 7/19 Board Meeting. 18 Retirement: Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendments to the Water and Power

Employees’ Retirement Plan to Address Issues Encountered in the Administration of Tier 2 Provisions

The Plan amendments will have no material impact.

At its regular meeting of June 8, 2016, the LADWP Retirement Board approved a resolution recommending Plan amendments to address issues encountered in administering the provisions establishing Tier 2 and the suspension of the Reciprocal Agreement between the Plan and the Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System (LACERS). The proposed amendments will correct and/or clarify issues encountered in the administration of Tier 2 benefits.

Item presented to the Board at the 7/19 Board Meeting. 19 WATER: Contract No. 7618 108-Inch Butterfly Valves for the Los Angeles Reservoir Ultraviolet

Disinfection Plant With Henry Pratt Company LLC

For an amount not to exceed $768,112 (budgeted). This is a one-time purchase.

Furnish and deliver butterfly valves required for the construction of the Los Angeles Reservoir Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection Plant.

The four 108-inch valves are components of the LA Reservoir UV Disinfection Plant Project. The Project will be constructed to meet United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. These valves will be used to control the flow of water during various modes of plant operation and during periods of inspection and maintenance.


of 8813

Page |


Item Deferred from the July 19th Board Meeting

FILED ITEMS

MONTHLY REPORTSCOO – June 2016

INFORMATIONAL REPORTCalifornia Friendly Incentive Program – Changes to Rebate Requirements


of 8813

From: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>To: Pettijohn, David <[email protected]>; Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Falcon, Penny <[email protected]>; Villegas, Rafael <[email protected]>; Castro, Art <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: FW: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Today at 10am

FYIPlease provide status after BAR to me so that I may move forward with assembling each of your boardpackages for the board meeting.Yvonne

From: Flores, VivianSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:43 AMTo: Rodriguez, Arlene; Gonzalez, Lupe; Rayas-glen, Yvonne; Spacht, JulieCc: Kay, MariaSubject: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Today at 10am

Attached is today's BAR agenda. Please forward to those attending today. Marty is still on vacation.Also, be sure to follow-up following the BAR on your items. The turn-around for GM approval isimmediately following BAR. Please provide the status after BAR to me.

Thanks,


From: Baule, SteveSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:56 PMTo: Wright, David; Santilli, Ann; SUTLEY, NANCY H; Lipa, Guy; Williams, Gwendolyn; Wong, Gary;Adams, Martin; Chung, Timothy; Moschos, Barbara; Bigasin, Vickie; Yancy, Winifred; Ramallo, Joseph;Sedlacek, Mark; Tom, Richard; Guglielmo, Neil; Lampe, Matt; Peltola, Jeff; Edwards, Marcie; Webster,Michael; Kendall, Andrew; Naglich, Frank C.; Gross, Aaron; Feldmeier, Lou; Townsend, Mark;Brajevich, Joseph; Rosenblatt, EricCc: Rodriguez, Susie; Stallworth, Shelly; Sigala, Patricia; Zerrudo, Lourdes; White, Glory; Flores,Vivian; Kay, Maria; Sternquist, Darlene; Sindayen, Lucina; Shirakawa, Susan; Bogin, LaTanya;Tesseneer, Silvia; Soto-Herrera, Nancy; Henderson, Jennifer; Mitchell, Chante; Ma, Joanne;Hovhanisian, IzabellaSubject: Board Agenda Review Meeting: Tomorrow 10am

Date: Wed Jul 20 2016 07:46:03 PDTAttachments: BAR for August 2 2016 Board Meeting.docx

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.498844

of 8813

Attached is the draft Agenda for the August 2nd Board Meeting. The Board Agenda Review Meetingwill be at 10am tomorrow (7/20).

ThanksSteve

of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Haddad, Serge <[email protected]>Cc: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>

Subject: RE: Worktech - Timesheet summaries including OT

Serge, here is a follow-up based on your subsequent instructions.

Thanks

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:52 PMTo: Haddad, SergeSubject: RE: Worktech - Timesheet summaries including OT

Here you go Serge:

2016 Overtime Query - Resources Development & Supply Assessment Group (Payroll 17-56, ID: W-RD-01)

Empl ID

Work Date

EarnType

RCAS No. (Work Order)

Work Order Description

Hours

Total Regular Hrs

000698507

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.00

2,088

000407116

Date: Tue Feb 14 2017 12:59:41 PSTAttachments: CY 2016 OT Quiery - RDSAG - 2-24-17.xml

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.787999

Page 53 of 8813

7/8/2016

TH

TBB89

General

1.50

2,089

000746208

8/26/2016

AE

TBB28

Water Energy Nexus

6.50

1,316

Group Total:

8.00

5,493.00

Date Range: 1/1/2016 to 12/31/16

Percent OT/Regular Hrs:

0.15%

Please let me know if you need further details.

Thanks,Earl

From: Haddad, SergeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:26 AMTo: Falcon, Penny; Lam, Jevon; Ohara, Kimberly; Kwan, Delon; Marcus, Sofia; Castro, Art; Tew,Anthony; Sun, Bob; Repp, Chris; Yegiazaryan, Heather; Moosbrugger, Earl; Hsu, SimonCc: Pettijohn, DavidSubject: Worktech - Timesheet summaries including OT

Hello,

Page 54 of 8813

David Pettijohn has requested that we provide him with a summary report on OT for staff. Please followthe steps below to query the OT totals of your staff for last year (2016). Please email them to me whencompleted.

1. Select "Time Review" from the top left corner in worktech

2. Select "DateRange" from the drop down menu titled "Date Scope"

3. Input the Start and End dates that you want to query

4. Select any single or multiple staff names you want to query (you can also click "All" under thenames list)

5. Select any single or multiple work orders you want to query (you can also click "All" under thework orders list)

6. Click on the folder with green arrow icon below the work orders list in the "Labor Transactions"field.

7. A window will pop up - select the Microsoft Excel file option under the format drop down

8. Check off "Include Hidden Columns"

9. Select OK and Save the File As

An excel spreadsheet should be generated. You can filter, sort, and further query this spreadsheet asyou see fit.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Page 55 of 8813

Thank you,

____________________________

Serge Haddad, P.E.

Manager of the Water Recycling Policy Group LADWP Water Resources Section

433 E. Temple St., Bldg 5, Room 103

Work: 213-367-8774<tel:213-367-8774> FAX: 213-367-6661<tel:213-367-6661>

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>

www.ladwp.com/RecycledWater<http://www.ladwp.com/RecycledWater<http://www.ladwp.com/RecycledWater%3chttp:/www.ladwp.com/RecycledWater>>

All Water is Recycled

Page 56 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Please review.

>From Barlow (#68) to Sears (#88), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinancesavings by (net add'l + voluntary savings + ordinance savings).

>From LACCCTF (#89) to NOHO West (#93), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving theordinance savings by the Table 1 Baseline, which excluded savings due to Ordinance No. 180822accounted for in the current SGF.

>From LAMP (#94) and on, the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinance savings bythe Base Demand.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:30 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Delon,

Yes to all.

Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

On hard copy printout of tracking sheet, a couple of questions:

* Numbering on far left most column starting with Lexington project, that's just when we startedcalc / tracking of voluntary savings? Yes

* Column C, net increase/decrease over existing, that's the approved amount in the WSA boardpackage, correct? Yes

* Ordinance savings under column F we started tracking with Barlow was corrected methodology?Yes.

Date: Thu Jul 21 2016 15:45:44 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.634061

Page 7125 of 8813

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 6:57 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Please send me the latest, updated WSA tracking spreadsheet.

Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:43 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Thanks Jin.

I can see that you added the 4.7% recent ordinance savings (formerly voluntary savings) to the firstpage as well as to Q.14.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:03 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Please see the revised Fact Sheet:Z:\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water Supply Assessments\WSAProjects\Crossroads Hollywood Project\Fact Sheet\Crossroads Hollywood Project Summary Fact Sheet2016 07 20.doc<file:///\\Galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\WSA%20Projects\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project\Fact%20Sheet\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project%20Summary%20Fact%20Sheet%202016%2007%2020.doc>

Total Ord. Savings = 116 AFY / 578 AFY = 20.0%Ord. 184248 Savings = [24 AFY (indoor) + 3 AFY (cooling)] / 578 AFY = 4.7%

4.7% out of 20.0% Ordinance Savings is due to Ordinance 184248 (effective 6/6/16). It does notnecessarily mean prior to Ordinance 184248 was adopted, developers would have voluntarilycommitted to the same level of conservation that is now required. For example, Ord. 184248 loweredthe maximum flow rate of showerhead from 2.0 gpm to 1.8 gpm. Now developers are required to install1.8 gpm or less for showerhead, but prior to the adoption of Ord. 184248, not all developers voluntarilycommitted to use 1.8 gpm showerheads.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:53 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Delon,

The Fact Sheet does not have the percentages, so we will send over a revised fact sheet; it will alsohave the last question eliminated.

Rainwater harvesting is only a soft commitment; applicant mentioned use of roof capture to water plants

Page 7126 of 8813

on way down but could not quantify due to early planning phase.

For LID, they will utilize infiltration, and will not have cisterns or other captured water.

No voluntary credit was given for harvesting.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:31 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

On last commitment, I saw rainwater harvesting, any more specifics? Is it related to LID or is this truevoluntary?

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:30 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

I didn't see in the fact sheet but thought it was calc before, how much of the 20% ordinance savings isprior voluntary that moved over to ordinance from recent amendment, I thought it was about 4%?

Page 7127 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:


Delon,

Yes to all.

Thanks








Thanks.



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.503089

Page 7128 of 8813

Thanks Jin.







Delon,


Rainwater harvesting is only a soft commitment; applicant mentioned use of roof capture to water plantson way down but could not quantify due to early planning phase.





From: Kwan, Delon

Page 7129 of 8813

Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:30 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Crossroads WSA fact sheet


Page 7130 of 8813



Delon,

Please disregard my third "yes" below.

Jin will answer that one.

Thanks


Delon,

Yes to all.

Thanks






From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 6:57 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, Jin


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.503099

Page 7131 of 8813



Thanks.


Thanks Jin.







Delon,




Page 7132 of 8813






Page 7133 of 8813


Subject: Crossroads WSA schedule

Please update to current schedule, also, I don't see review time built in for Tina and my review (e.g. Idon't want to see board package on day it's due to Yvonne.).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:41 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

We are behind schedule.

Items in red are complete.

Still have a couple updates and I need to review final package.

3/31/16

WSA request letter received but lost

4/15/16

Scanned copy of WSA request letter received

4/20/16

Start reviewing WSA request letter, and send add'l scope questions

4/26/16

Conservation meeting

6/1/16

Scope confirmation e-mail

6/1/16

Date: Wed Jun 15 2016 08:27:34 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.447744

Page 7134 of 8813

Set up Board calendar item + Outlook

6/1/16

Conservation Commitment letter

6/8/16

WSA calcs and package complete

6/15/16

All reviews up to Division secretary

6/21/16

Legal stamp

6/23/16

Draft Board Package to Division secretary, including appendices

6/30/16

Final Board Package to WEX for GM

7/6/16

BAR Meeting

7/19/16

Board Meeting(90 days from 3/31/16 is 6/29/16)

Earl Moosbrugger, PEResources Development and Supply Assessment GroupWater System Executive Office / Water Resources SectionLos Angeles Department of Water and Power111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012(213) 367-2527

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:36 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Please provide me with schedule to meet 7/19 board meeting date.

Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, Earl

Page 7135 of 8813

Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:29 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Yes


From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:27 PMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Is plan for Crossroad WSA to go to Board 7/19 meeting?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:02 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

New activities and activities that still need our attention are shown in red.

Highlight of this week:

* Crossroads Hollywood WSA: Water demand calculations are completed.

WSA - General - Jin

* Requested Yoshiko Tsunehara to confirm 6-fold increase in RW use on 5/26/16, and receivedMario's response on edits. - 6/2/16

* Earl requested Todd Rother's group for an update on SFB clean up, and received Todd'sresponse on edits. - 6/6/16

* Updated the WSA template as discussed at the 5/23/16 meeting with Delon. - 6/6/16

* Received RW Outreach edits from Serge. - 6/7/16

* Requested Sofia Marcus to include a statement about the state ending the mandatoryconservation on 5/19/16, and reminded her on 6/9/16

* Requested Jevon to provide water conservation %. - 6/9/16.

UC Davis Proposal - Jin

Page 7136 of 8813

* Need to let Kendra know if Final Report is acceptable to close out the contract.

.Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Date: 7/19/16)

* EIR consultant responded to comments/questions on 5/27/16 version conservation commitmentletter, and submitted a revised letter. - 6/8/16

* Sent scope confirmation request email to Planning. - 6/8/16

* Received the final signed conservation commitment letter by email. - 6/8/16

* Received the scope confirmation email. - 6/9/16

* Table 1 and 2 calc are completed. - 6/9/16

USR: Santa Monica Barrington Project - Jin (Due 6/15/16)

* Deferred to Distribution. - 6/6/16

Page 7137 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>

Subject: Weekly Work Activity Report



* 668 S. Alameda Street Project WSA: Sent out comments/ follow-up questions on scope questionresponses.

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) - Jin

* Reminded Kingsford to send 2016 LAA hydro generation data when available.- 3/20/17

* Update EI Current spreadsheet using revised LADWP historical carbon emission factors to reflectthe published 2016 IRP and also projected carbon emission factors provided by Jay Lim of the PowerSystem .- 3/27/17

* Update EI Current spreadsheet using revised MWD supply breakdown projections to FYE40.-3/27/17

* Worked on BB Summit presentation slides.- 4/6/17

WSA - General - Jin

* Jim Kemper is waiting for a copy of 2017 LA Green Code (available in a week or 2). Once hegets the the copy, he will do a final check on the code change. Changes are very minor due the newcode. - 3/9/17

Worktech- Jin

* Replaced the outgoing time keeper with the new time keeper in Worktech. - 4/3/17

Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Approved on 8/2/16)

* Responded to Legal regarding what emails were already submitted to Legal. - 4/3/17

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA - Jin (Board Meeting: 3/7/16)

Date: Thu Apr 06 2017 11:57:11 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.730504

Page 7138 of 8813

* Prepared the division weekly summary for Olive View-UCAL as well as two other WSAsapproved on 3/7/17. - 3/27/17

* Sent stamped Reso to County. - 3/29/17

* Earl sent the draft transmittal letter to Yvonne. - 4/3/17

College Station Project WSA - Jin (Board Meeting: 3/21/17)

* Sent water demand info to Water Recycling Planning. - 4/3/17

* Sent stamped Reso to Applicant and Planning. - 4/3/17

* Prepared a draft transmittal letter. - 4/4/17

Olympic Tower Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 6/6/17)

* Sent comments on draft water conservation commitment letter. - 3/23/17

* Sent an email to check the status of scope responses and revised draft water conservationcommitment letter. - 4/6/17

668 S. Alameda Street Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 6/6/17)

* Asked for status of scope responses and water consv commit letter. -4/3/17

* Received scope responses and draft water conservation commitment letter. -4/3/17

* sent comments on scope question responses. -4/6/17

* Planning to send comments on commitment letter. -4/6/17

L.A. County CCTF (Consolidated Correctional Treatment Facility) - Jin

* L.A. County Public Works left a voicemail asking whether RW would be available for the project.Left a voicemail with Grace David's contact info. Also emailed Grace and asked her to contact theCounty to provide RW info . -4/4/17

Page 7139 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>

Subject: Weekly Work Activity Report



* Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA: Board Package isprepared and will be submitted to Clerical for review on 2/9/17.


* No new activities this week

Worktech- Jin

* Need to transfer Peter Dugan from Simon Hsu's group to Sofia Marcus' group and change thepayroll code of all staff involved in recent transfer/movement. Will make this change on 2/23/17.

Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Approved on 8/2/16)

* Need to save emails exchanged with staff/agency other than Planning per AB 900 requirement,on 2/10/17 (due to Planning by 2/28/17).

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting:3/7/16)

* Milena Zasadzien of City Planning responded that City Planning has not been in direct contactwith County on this project and that she will ask the County to add City Planning to the mailing list forthe future DEIR. She also mentioned that there aren't any separate City environmental requirements,since County will be analyzing impacts and addressing mitigations in the EIR. -2/2/17

* Received final commitment letter. -2/6/17

* Submitted for legal review. -2/6/17

* Noticed a mistake in scope and revised it. County confirmed the revised scope. -2/8/17

* Board Package is prepared and will be submitted to Clerical for review on 2/9/17.

College Station Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 3/14/17)

Date: Thu Feb 09 2017 11:46:01 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.710522

Page 7140 of 8813

* Received revised draft commitment letter. - 2/3/17

* Received another revised draft commitment letter. - 2/6/17

* Draft board package was prepared . - 2/8/17

* Received the final commitment letter. - 2/8/17

* Notified target board date of 3/21/17 to the applicant. - 2/9/17

Olympic Tower Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 4/18/17)

* Sent a reminder to send responses to the scope questions. - 2/7/17

* A consultant hired by the Applicant to respond to scope questions and commitment letterresponded that his firm will prepare the documents in the coming weeks. - 2/8/17

668 S. Alameda Street Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 5/2/17)

* WSA Request Letter was received in the WEX office on 2/6/17 and assigned to Jin on 2/7/17.

* Started reviewing the WSA request letter. - 2/7/17.

* Requested a W.O. number. - 2/9/17

CPRA Request for WSAs - Jin

* Need to print out documents for Olympic and Broadway Project.

Abode at Glassell Park DEIR - Jin (due 2/21/17)

* No new activities this week.

Page 7141 of 8813

From: Aghakhani, Ryan <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Maybe we can go over sometime this week when you have time as I'm working on my 3700 Wilshirespreadsheet? Thank you.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 3:02 PMTo: Aghakhani, RyanSubject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

It's been a couple of weeks since I looked at it, so I would have to go back to it later, but I remembernoticing there was a mistake that I needed to fix. I'll let you know, but I don't think I'll get to it this week.Thanks.

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Hi Jin,

I'm not sure what would exactly change. Please let me know when you are updating, thanks.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 8:29 AMTo: Aghakhani, Ryan; Tcharssov, AndreiCc: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Ryan and Andre,

I haven't had time, but I might need to revise something on the Crossroads Hollywood WSA OrdinanceSavings. The total Ordinance savings calculation is correct, but the calculation for Ordinance Savingsnot accounted for in 2015 UMWP might need to be revised.

When you work on your calculations, please keep in mind that 2015 UMWP water demand forecastmodel incorporates updated plumbing codes up to 2009 (Ordinance 180822). Between Ordinance180822 and the current Ordinance 184248 effective June 2016, there was a code change by CalGreenin Jan 2014. Ordinance 180822 restricted kitchen faucet (non-commercial such as for kitchen,cafeteria, etc.) flow rate to 2.2 gpm. CalGreen restricted it to 1.8 gpm in Jan 2014. And Ordinance184248 restricted it to 1.5 gpm in Jun 2016. I'm not sure if my Crossroads Ordinance savings calc notaccounted for in 2015 UWMP considered the CalGreen code change. I need to go back to thecalculations later.

Thank you.

Date: Mon Sep 26 2016 14:12:50 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.661768

Page 7142 of 8813

Jin HwangCivil Engineering AssociateLos Angeles Department of Water and PowerWater Executive / Water Resources111 N. Hope St. Room 1468Los Angeles, CA 90012213-367-4845

Page 7143 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Thanks Jin!

You can remove old items, such as Crossroads, Boatyard and Brentwood.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:31 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report



* Lake on Wilshire Project WSA: Prepared for the Water Conservation Meeting.


* Prepared a draft presentation on UC Davis' EI study. -9/14/16.Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Approved on 8/2/16)

* Need to revise breakdown between Ordinance savings accounted for and not accounted for in2015 UWMP and input in the WSA monitoring sheet. - 8/18/16

* Transmittal letter was sent out. - 9/6/16

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting:11/1/16)

* Asked the Applicant for status of rest of add'l scope question responses and follow up questions,and the Applicant forwarded existing cooling tower water use information. -9/8/16

* Target board meeting is revised to 11/1/16.

Boatyard Landscape Renovation WELWA - Jin

Date: Fri Sep 16 2016 13:00:24 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.657672

Page 7144 of 8813

* Architect does not need the plans and form back, and asked to discard it. - 9/8/16.

* Task completed.

Lake on Wilshire Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Meeting: 11/1/16)

* Sent out additional scope questions. -9/8/16

* Working on gathering information on voluntary conservation measures (graywater, stormwatercapture, multi-family unit individual submetering). -9/15/16

* Water Conservation Meeting notice was sent out. -9/15/16

Brentwood School Education Master Plan FEIR - Jin

* FEIR was received and filed without reviewing. - 9/8/16

* Task completed.

Page 7145 of 8813

From: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Jin,It was mailed September 6th. I did not send you a copy because Earl did not add your name to the BC:list...See attached.Yvonne

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:00 AMTo: Rayas-glen, YvonneSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Good morning Yvonne,

Was the transmittal letter for Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA sent out to City Planning, and if sowhen was it sent out? Do you have a scanned copy of the transmittal letter?

Thank you.


From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:52 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

OK

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:22 AMTo: Rayas-glen, Yvonne; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Yvonne,

Earl will send it to you next Monday. Thank you.

Date: Thu Sep 15 2016 08:06:56 PDTAttachments: SIGNED BERTONI LETTER DATED 8-31-16.pdf

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.657011

Page 7146 of 8813

From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 5:34 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

There is no letter attached??

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:28 PMTo: Rayas-glen, YvonneCc: Hwang, JinSubject: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Hello Yvonne,

Please see attached transmittal letter for WSA for Crossroads as well as link below to attachments:

\\galaxy\Water Resources\Water Resources Development\Share\Earl\To Yvonne 160825<file:///\\galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Share\Earl\To%20Yvonne%20160825>


Thanks,

Earl

Page 7147 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.657011-000001Owner: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>Filename: SIGNED BERTONI LETTER DATED 8-31-16.pdfLast Modified: Thu Sep 15 08:06:56 PDT 2016

48 of 8813

SIGNED BERTONI LETTER DATED 8-31-16.pdf for Printed Item: 1077 ( Attachment 1 of 1)

Page 7149 of 8813


Page 7150 of 8813


Page 7151 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Thank you!


From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:07 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Jin,It was mailed September 6th. I did not send you a copy because Earl did not add your name to the BC:list...See attached.Yvonne

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:00 AMTo: Rayas-glen, YvonneSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Good morning Yvonne,

Was the transmittal letter for Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA sent out to City Planning, and if sowhen was it sent out? Do you have a scanned copy of the transmittal letter?

Thank you.


Date: Thu Sep 15 2016 08:08:16 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.657013

Page 7152 of 8813

From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:52 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

OK

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:22 AMTo: Rayas-glen, Yvonne; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Yvonne,

Earl will send it to you next Monday. Thank you.

From: Rayas-glen, YvonneSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 5:34 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

There is no letter attached??

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:28 PMTo: Rayas-glen, YvonneCc: Hwang, JinSubject: WSA for Crossroads - Transmittal Letter - Please Process

Hello Yvonne,

Please see attached transmittal letter for WSA for Crossroads as well as link below to attachments:

\\galaxy\Water Resources\Water Resources Development\Share\Earl\To Yvonne 160825<file:///\\galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Share\Earl\To%20Yvonne%20160825>


Thanks,

Earl

Page 7153 of 8813



Thanks Jin.

I have a question: Is there a reason why you didn't fill in cells AN through AZ for your last two WSAs onmonitoring spreadsheets?

Thanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:54 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report



* Water Energy Nexus: Prepared a draft presentation on UC Davis' EI study.


* Prepared a draft presentation on UC Davis' EI study.

Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Board Date: 8/2/16)

* Input water demand, conservation info in the WSA monitoring sheet. - 8/15/16

* Prepared a draft transmittal letter. Waiting for stamped Reso. (Not available as of 8/17/16 12:30p.m.) - 8/15/16

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA - Jin

* Received WSA request letter. - 8/5/16

* Sent out additional scope questions. - 8/9/16

* Per LA County's request to send a letter requesting $17,000 WSA fee, provided a copy ofResolution No. 014 135. - 8/10/16

Date: Wed Aug 17 2016 13:03:22 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.645907

Page 7154 of 8813

* LA County asked if LADWP can provide something to request $17,000. Responded that theReso is all we can provide. - 8/16/16.

* Water Conservation is scheduled for 8/23/16. Meeting notice was sent out with handoutattachments. -8/15/16.


* Received a WELWA request in person. - 8/10/16

* Verified by using Customer Connect, WMIS, and asking Guillermo Serrano in Water GIS that theproject site is not served by LADWP. - 8/10/16

* Informed the architect that the project site is not served by LADWP. Architect will pick up theplans and WELWA form (not picked up by 8/17/16). - 8/11/16

Page 7155 of 8813


Subject: RE: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures

Jin,

If we did discover that Hotel rooms had a high number of suites and/or that some had kitchens andsome didn't, how would this affect our calculations?

Thanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:06 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures

Comment is added and sample CC letter is saved as version 32.Z:\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water Supply Assessments\WaterConservation\Sample Conservation Commitment Letter32.doc<file:///\\Galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\Water%20Conservation\Sample%20Conservation%20Commitment%20Letter32.doc>

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:15 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures

Okay. Can we put a comments for our group in the template concisely explaining this?

I think the note should explain that we would not use fixture counts in most cases but would use for thepurposes below, acknowledging that number of rooms to estimate conservation from hotel rooms.

What do you think?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 7:21 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures

Earl,

Even though we use number of rooms to estimate water conservation for hotel rooms, I think we shouldcontinue to ask for # of plumbing fixtures. It gives us an idea on how many of the hotel rooms aresuites. For example, Crossroads Hollywood proposes 308 hotel rooms, and proposed number of toiletsis 328. This tells us it's mostly one room, and some of the rooms are suites. If we ever get a muchhigher number of toilets than number of hotel rooms, we may want to take that into account our hotelwater demand, although that is unlikely. Also, not every hotel room has a kitchen, so we do need the

Date: Wed Jul 20 2016 08:02:12 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632451

Page 7156 of 8813

proposed number of kitchen faucets to get an idea of how many of the proposed hotel rooms havekitchens.

Page 7157 of 8813



I haven't really thought about it, but maybe we can consider adding x% to the hotel room SGF, and usea higher number of occupancy than 1.5 to estimate conservation?

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:02 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures

Jin,


Thanks






What do you think?



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632461

Page 7158 of 8813

Earl,

Even though we use number of rooms to estimate water conservation for hotel rooms, I think we shouldcontinue to ask for # of plumbing fixtures. It gives us an idea on how many of the hotel rooms aresuites. For example, Crossroads Hollywood proposes 308 hotel rooms, and proposed number of toiletsis 328. This tells us it's mostly one room, and some of the rooms are suites. If we ever get a muchhigher number of toilets than number of hotel rooms, we may want to take that into account our hotelwater demand, although that is unlikely. Also, not every hotel room has a kitchen, so we do need theproposed number of kitchen faucets to get an idea of how many of the proposed hotel rooms havekitchens.

Page 7159 of 8813

of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:


Can we go over some time this morning latest version of presentation to see updates from last week'sreview.

Also, please explain highlight, I thought it was closed item a while back. Response still pending fromus?

Thanks.




* Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project: Water Conservation Meeting washeld.


* Prepared a draft presentation on UC Davis' EI study. -8/24/16



Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Date: 8/2/16)


* Received stamped Reso and prepared a transmittal letter. - 8/18/16


Date: Thu Aug 25 2016 06:26:07 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.586360

Page 7164 of 8813

* Prepared preliminary schedule. -8/22/16.

* Applicant sent responses to most of the add'l questions before the Water Conservation meeting.-8/23/16.

* Water Conservation meeting was held. -8/23/16.

* Water Conservation meeting was held. -8/23/16

* Sent out follow-up scope questions. - 8/24/16



* Architect has not picked up the plants as of 8/24/16.

USR for Del Rey Point Project - Jin

* Deferred to Water Distribution and RW. - 8/15/16

* Prepared draft response to Jim Kemper. - 8/15/16

* Verified with Water GIS that project site is in LADWP service area. - 8/18/16

* Sent a reminder to RW to respond. -8/18/16

* RW responded, and Earl sent out response to Jim Kemper. -8/19/16

* Task Complete

550 Palos Verdes Project WSA - Jin

* Estimated project water demand and determined a WSA is not required. - 8/24/16

Page 7165 of 8813


Subject: Re: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

?What date did you request back from city attorney?

________________________________From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:46 PMTo: Kwan, DelonCc: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

After review and edits, package was sent to Legal in both hardcopy (with signable Reso - 2 copies) andelectronically (accept all changes; leave legal comments).

Here is link for your review of our version (keeping all changes to date):

\\galaxy\Water Resources\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water SupplyAssessments\WSA Projects\Crossroads Hollywood Project\Board Package<file:///\\galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\WSA%20Projects\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project\Board%20Package>

Please see versions with today's date and subscript "v1."

Thanks!

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 6:41 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Re: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

Since city attorney only needs to sign reso, suggest you get the board letter and reso updated, andinclude latest updates to the WSA document (cleaned up), and get package to the city attorney to startreviewing, at same time, you can continue to final the remaining updates to the WSA.

I'm not sure how much more time you need to get the template updated, otherwise, processing of thisWSA is getting further delayed.


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.470092

Page 7168 of 8813

Let me know what you think.

________________________________From: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 10:34 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

Here are my comments / edits to draft board letter and reso. Let me know if you have any questionsand if we need to discuss.

Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Monday, June 27, 2016 10:38 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

Here are my comments to the draft WSA. Review board letter and reso now.

Page 7169 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

July 6, if possible.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:50 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Re: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

What date did you request back from city attorney?


After review and edits, package was sent to Legal in both hardcopy (with signable Reso – 2 copies) andelectronically (accept all changes; leave legal comments).



Please see versions with today’s date and subscript “v1.”

Thanks!



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.470094

Page 7170 of 8813






Thanks.



Page 7171 of 8813


Subject: RE: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

I told her for us to make our Board date, it would require an early review by July 6, but I told her we don’t expect that since we normally should allow two weeks.

I said if she is not able to complete review, we will bump to next Board date.

I put Board item form in your inbox today, late in the game I know, but it has been very difficult to gageprogress on this WSA update.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:50 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Re: comments to draft WSA for crossroads

What date did you request back from city attorney?


After review and edits, package was sent to Legal in both hardcopy (with signable Reso – 2 copies) andelectronically (accept all changes; leave legal comments).



Please see versions with today’s date and subscript “v1.”

Thanks!


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.470095

Page 7172 of 8813







Thanks.



Page 7173 of 8813

From: Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Update on WSA Updates

Jin,

Thank you. Hope the next week is not too stressful for you guys.

Andrei TcharssovLADWP Water Resources Development111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012(213) 367-2155

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:31 PMTo: Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Update on WSA Updates

Thanks. Have a great vacation, Andrei!


From: Tcharssov, AndreiSent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:30 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Update on WSA Updates

All,

I made the revisions to WSA and Reso per our meeting. I uploaded the files here: \\galaxy\WaterResources\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water Supply Assessments\WSAProjects\Crossroads Hollywood Project\Board Package<file:///\\galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\WSA%20Projects\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project\Board%20Package>

See files dated 6-3-16.

Thanks.

Andrei Tcharssov

Date: Fri Jun 03 2016 14:32:39 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.229878

Page 7174 of 8813

LADWP Water Resources Development111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012(213) 367-2155

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 12:24 PMTo: Hwang, Jin; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Update on WSA Updates

What about Delon's comments?

Have we addressed any of those yet?

We need to complete updates by Monday or the CrossRoads schedule will be in jeopardy.

Thanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 12:20 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Update on WSA Updates

No update from me except I sent a request to RW group last week to ask if 6 fold increase info isacceptable, etc.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 12:19 PMTo: Tcharssov, Andrei; Hwang, JinSubject: Update on WSA Updates

Can you give me an update on how your updates are coming along?

Thanks

Page 7175 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.792776-000001Owner: Rudek, John <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Feb 15 09:46:00 PST 2017

Page 7181 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7183 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.792775-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Feb 15 09:34:46 PST 2017

Page 7190 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7192 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7199 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7201 of 8813

of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Aghakhani, Ryan <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Scope Qs to Planning - WSA for 698 New Hampshire Project

Thanks,

I'll try to review before 1pm.

Please come to me for next item on priority list when you get back from lunch.

Thanks

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 11:47 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Scope Qs to Planning - WSA for 698 New Hampshire Project

Red text means it's from Crossroads response. Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:41 AMTo: Aghakhani, RyanSubject: FW: Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Scope questions

Here is a template to go off for the scope questions to Planning.

THanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:46 AMTo: Alejandro Huerta ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); StephanieEyestone-Jones ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)Cc: Moosbrugger, Earl; Kwan, DelonSubject: Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Scope questions

Hello, Alejandro and Stephanie,

We have reviewed the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) Request Letter for the Crossroads HollywoodProject (Proposed Project). Based on our review of the scope description provided in your requestletter, the following items listed below require further clarification/details in order for us to continue withour water demand analyses for the referenced project:

General:

Date: Thu Jun 16 2016 12:02:54 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.712043

Page 7212 of 8813

1. General Plan: Please confirm Proposed Project will not require a General Plan amendment.

2. Is the Proposed Project consistent with the growth projection in the most updated SCAG/RTP?Existing to be removed scope:

3. Does Table 1 of the WSA Request Letter (dated 3/31/16) include all existing uses, includingexisting uses to be retained?

4. Please describe rehabilitation work to be done to existing Crossroads of the World. Will all areasin Crossroads of the World that have plumbing fixtures (restrooms, kitchen, etc.) be rehabilitated, or willsome areas be left as they are now? If any areas are to remain unchanged, please indicate uses andsquare footage for each unchanged area.

5. Currently, is there a cooling tower in use. If so, will it be completely removed, or will it be used inany part of the proposed new development and/or renovation?

6. Please provide, as much as possible, existing Meter Numbers, Customer Access Numbers andWater Use information of existing development per the table below. For the "Water Used For" column,indicate landscape, cooling tower, etc. Also, if available, please provide Customer Name and Address.Does the information in the table below include all existing water uses to be removed, including but notlimited to, landscape irrigation, any parking water use, and cooling tower (if cooling tower exists)?

Water Meter Number

Customer Access Number (CAN)

Service for

Water Used for

Customer Name

Address

Example

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxx

John Doe

1540 Highland Ave.

Irrigation

Page 7213 of 8813

Proposed new scope:

7. Residential: Using the Sewer Generation Factors (SGFs) table (http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/pdf/sfcfeerates.pdf starting from page 9 of 15, please provide a breakdown of any amenities.For example, x sf of fitness center, etc.

8. Restaurant/Bars: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of the proposed restaurantbelow. If bars or coffee houses will be proposed, please review the list of SGFs, and provide abreakdown of those also in applicable units (# of seats, square feet, etc,).Proposed Restaurant Type

# of seats

Fast Food Indoor Seat

Fast Food Outdoor Seat

Full Service Indoor Seat

Full Service Outdoor Seat

9. Retail/Commercial: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of the proposedcommercial (in appropriate units, such as sf or # of seats). Some commercial uses, such as "beautyparlor," have a higher water usage rate than regular retail use.

10. Hotel: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of any hotel amenities. For example, x sfof fitness center, etc.

11. Swimming pools (not associated with a gym or health club): Please provide the size (length xwidth x depth, or area x depth if irregularly shaped) of the pools.

12. Open Space: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of all uses and relevant units,

Page 7214 of 8813

such as sf, etc, required to estimate water consumption.

13. Landscape: For all areas of the Proposed Project, please provide landscape area square footageand include the Plant Factors (PF) and Hydrozone Areas (HA), separately for residential area and non-residential area. Refer to the California Code of Regulations Title 23. Division 2. Chapter 2.7. ModelWater Efficient Landscape Ordinance. (http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/)

14. Parking: What is the total square footage of the proposed 2,596 space subterranean parking?

15. Cooling towers: If cooling towers are proposed, please provide the chiller capacity of the proposedcooling towers (in tons) and the hours of service (x hours/day, x days/week, x weeks/year). If the chillercapacity information of proposed cooling tower is not available, we will make the conservativeassumption that cooling tower will be used for all proposed uses except for landscaping and parking.Please confirm this assumption.

16. Remaining Uses: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of all remaining uses noincluded above (opens space, green space, recreational space, amenities), if any, and include relevantunits, such as sf, etc., required to estimate water consumption.

17. Will the proposed project pursue LEED certification? If so, list level of certification pursued.

18. We may have follow-up questions after reviewing your response.

Your prompt response is appreciated. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.


Page 7215 of 8813

From: Aghakhani, Ryan <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: Scope Qs to Planning - WSA for 698 New Hampshire Project

Red text means it's from Crossroads response. Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:41 AMTo: Aghakhani, RyanSubject: FW: Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Scope questions

Here is a template to go off for the scope questions to Planning.

THanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:46 AMTo: Alejandro Huerta ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); StephanieEyestone-Jones ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)Cc: Moosbrugger, Earl; Kwan, DelonSubject: Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Scope questions

Hello, Alejandro and Stephanie,

We have reviewed the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) Request Letter for the Crossroads HollywoodProject (Proposed Project). Based on our review of the scope description provided in your requestletter, the following items listed below require further clarification/details in order for us to continue withour water demand analyses for the referenced project:

General:

1. General Plan: Please confirm Proposed Project will not require a General Plan amendment.

2. Is the Proposed Project consistent with the growth projection in the most updated SCAG/RTP?Existing to be removed scope:

3. Does Table 1 of the WSA Request Letter (dated 3/31/16) include all existing uses, includingexisting uses to be retained?

4. Please describe rehabilitation work to be done to existing Crossroads of the World. Will all areasin Crossroads of the World that have plumbing fixtures (restrooms, kitchen, etc.) be rehabilitated, or willsome areas be left as they are now? If any areas are to remain unchanged, please indicate uses andsquare footage for each unchanged area.

5. Currently, is there a cooling tower in use. If so, will it be completely removed, or will it be used in

Date: Thu Jun 16 2016 11:47:18 PDTAttachments: Scope Qs to Planning - WSA for 698 New Hampshire Project.docx

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.712038

Page 7216 of 8813

any part of the proposed new development and/or renovation?

6. Please provide, as much as possible, existing Meter Numbers, Customer Access Numbers andWater Use information of existing development per the table below. For the "Water Used For" column,indicate landscape, cooling tower, etc. Also, if available, please provide Customer Name and Address.Does the information in the table below include all existing water uses to be removed, including but notlimited to, landscape irrigation, any parking water use, and cooling tower (if cooling tower exists)?

Water Meter Number

Customer Access Number (CAN)

Service for

Water Used for

Customer Name

Address

Example

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxx

John Doe

1540 Highland Ave.

Irrigation

Page 7217 of 8813

Proposed new scope:

7. Residential: Using the Sewer Generation Factors (SGFs) table (http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/pdf/sfcfeerates.pdf starting from page 9 of 15, please provide a breakdown of any amenities.For example, x sf of fitness center, etc.

8. Restaurant/Bars: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of the proposed restaurantbelow. If bars or coffee houses will be proposed, please review the list of SGFs, and provide abreakdown of those also in applicable units (# of seats, square feet, etc,).Proposed Restaurant Type

# of seats

Fast Food Indoor Seat

Fast Food Outdoor Seat

Full Service Indoor Seat

Full Service Outdoor Seat

9. Retail/Commercial: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of the proposedcommercial (in appropriate units, such as sf or # of seats). Some commercial uses, such as "beautyparlor," have a higher water usage rate than regular retail use.

10. Hotel: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of any hotel amenities. For example, x sfof fitness center, etc.

11. Swimming pools (not associated with a gym or health club): Please provide the size (length xwidth x depth, or area x depth if irregularly shaped) of the pools.

12. Open Space: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of all uses and relevant units,such as sf, etc, required to estimate water consumption.

13. Landscape: For all areas of the Proposed Project, please provide landscape area square footageand include the Plant Factors (PF) and Hydrozone Areas (HA), separately for residential area and non-residential area. Refer to the California Code of Regulations Title 23. Division 2. Chapter 2.7. ModelWater Efficient Landscape Ordinance. (http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/)

14. Parking: What is the total square footage of the proposed 2,596 space subterranean parking?

15. Cooling towers: If cooling towers are proposed, please provide the chiller capacity of the proposedcooling towers (in tons) and the hours of service (x hours/day, x days/week, x weeks/year). If the chillercapacity information of proposed cooling tower is not available, we will make the conservativeassumption that cooling tower will be used for all proposed uses except for landscaping and parking.

Page 7218 of 8813

Please confirm this assumption.

16. Remaining Uses: Using the SGFs table, please provide a breakdown of all remaining uses noincluded above (opens space, green space, recreational space, amenities), if any, and include relevantunits, such as sf, etc., required to estimate water consumption.

17. Will the proposed project pursue LEED certification? If so, list level of certification pursued.

18. We may have follow-up questions after reviewing your response.

Your prompt response is appreciated. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.


Page 7219 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>

Subject: REVISED DEIR GUIDELINES NOTICE

As discussed yesterday, here are the revised DEIR Guidelines.

New changes are in track changes mode.

All changes to previous draft were accepted prior to changes for this draft.

These changes are based on a meeting with GW Group and Delon yesterday.

Thanks.

Date: Thu Nov 19 2015 12:28:49 PSTAttachments: GUIDELINES FOR DEIR REVIEW - 151119 (CURRENT).docx

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.98865

Page 7223 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.98865-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: GUIDELINES FOR DEIR REVIEW - 151119 (CURRENT).docxLast Modified: Thu Nov 19 12:28:49 PST 2015

Page 7224 of 8813


Page 7236 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7238 of 8813

of 8813


Subject: RE: Weekly Summary

Earl,

Updated Summary, forgot to put fact sheet on there. Thanks.

Water Supply Assessment

* Crossroads WSA Review Meeting 05/23/16 (1.5 hrs)

Miscellaneous

* Attended Presentation on St Francis Dam Disaster on 5/24/16 (1 hr)

* Read UWMP Executive Summary and Ch 8 on 5/19/16 to 5/26/16

* Scheduled to read ch 11, 12, and executive summary again in UWMP

* Set up and organize workspace, home folder, gym membership, phone, etc. on 5/19 to 5/24

* Attended MWD Delta Tour on 5/25/16 (all-day)

* Scheduled to write brief summary about MWD tour 5/26 to 5/27

* Developing fact sheet (Ordinance 184248) for Delon 5/24 & 5/26

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:26 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Summary

Earl,

05/26/16 - Weekly Summary



Miscellaneous


Date: Thu May 26 2016 08:52:53 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.702347

Page 7240 of 8813






From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:12 PMTo: Aghakhani, RyanSubject: RE: Weekly Summary

Perfect!

Please also add chapters of UWMP that are in progress or completed.

Thanks!

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 3:38 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Weekly Summary

Earl,

Here is my first weekly summary. Please let me know if there are any errors or if you have anysuggestions. Thanks!


* Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA conference call with City Planning on 5/19/16 (1 hr)

Water Energy Nexus

* Attended meeting on data to provide for UCLA on 5/18/16 (1 hr)

* Attended UC Davis Webinar on 5/19/16 (3 hrs)

Miscellaneous

* First day on Job - Division meeting, orientation, etc. on 5/16/16

* Attended New Employee Safety Meeting on 5/18/16 (4 hrs)

* Attended Presentation on Colorado River Aqueduct on 5/19/16 (1 hr)

* Set up computer, Outlook, I.D. Badge, Parking, supplies, etc. on 5/16 to 5/19

Page 7241 of 8813

* Attended Board meeting on 5/17/16 (3 hrs)

* Scheduled for St Francis Dam Presentation on 5/24/16 (1hr)

* Scheduled for MWD Diamond Valley Tour on 5/25/16 (all-day)

Ryan AghakhaniResources Development and Supply Assessment GroupWater System Executive Office / Water Resources SectionLos Angeles Department of Water and Power111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012

Page 7242 of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Aghakhani, Ryan <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Ryan,

Can you see if Andrei can go over it with you today? I went over it with him last week, so I assume hehad to work on savings calculations recently. Let me know if you still have questions. Thanks.

I was in all day training yesterday. Sorry for late replies.

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:13 PMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Maybe we can go over sometime this week when you have time as I'm working on my 3700 Wilshirespreadsheet? Thank you.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 3:02 PMTo: Aghakhani, RyanSubject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

It's been a couple of weeks since I looked at it, so I would have to go back to it later, but I remembernoticing there was a mistake that I needed to fix. I'll let you know, but I don't think I'll get to it this week.Thanks.

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Hi Jin,

I'm not sure what would exactly change. Please let me know when you are updating, thanks.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 8:29 AMTo: Aghakhani, Ryan; Tcharssov, AndreiCc: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Crossroads Hollywod WSA - Ordinance Savings

Ryan and Andre,

I haven't had time, but I might need to revise something on the Crossroads Hollywood WSA OrdinanceSavings. The total Ordinance savings calculation is correct, but the calculation for Ordinance Savings

Date: Tue Sep 27 2016 06:24:58 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.661799

Page 7243 of 8813

not accounted for in 2015 UMWP might need to be revised.

When you work on your calculations, please keep in mind that 2015 UMWP water demand forecastmodel incorporates updated plumbing codes up to 2009 (Ordinance 180822). Between Ordinance180822 and the current Ordinance 184248 effective June 2016, there was a code change by CalGreenin Jan 2014. Ordinance 180822 restricted kitchen faucet (non-commercial such as for kitchen,cafeteria, etc.) flow rate to 2.2 gpm. CalGreen restricted it to 1.8 gpm in Jan 2014. And Ordinance184248 restricted it to 1.5 gpm in Jun 2016. I'm not sure if my Crossroads Ordinance savings calc notaccounted for in 2015 UWMP considered the CalGreen code change. I need to go back to thecalculations later.

Thank you.


Page 7244 of 8813



I was only interested in knowing what the value was in determining if a significant number of the hotelrooms were suites and/or had kitchens, since we are tracking it through fixture counts.

Do you know the answer?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:09 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: WSA - hotel plumbing fixtures



Jin,


Thanks






Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632698

Page 7245 of 8813


What do you think?


Earl,


Page 7246 of 8813



For a small % of suites and kitchens (such as Crossroads), there is no change in how we estimate thebase demand and conservation. We will use the hotel room SGF and use # of rooms for conservationcalc.

In the future if we have a WSA where the hotel room fixture count is much higher than number of hotelrooms, we may want to consider using a higher SGF and higher # of occupancy than 1.5.







Jin,


Thanks



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632703

Page 7247 of 8813





What do you think?


Earl,


Page 7248 of 8813



See below. To clarify my last question sent, have we ever taken this information into consideration inadjusting hotel water demand, and have we ever had a case where there were a high percentage ofsuites, or is the idea to track it in case we ever do come across this case? I just figured that with all ofthe WSAs we have done in the past that we probably would have already come across this case, but Icould be wrong.

Thanks







Jin,


Thanks



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632707

Page 7249 of 8813





What do you think?


Earl,


Page 7250 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.629171-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Thu Jul 14 08:15:15 PDT 2016

Page 7254 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7259 of 8813

of 8813


Subject: RE: voicemail

Jin,

The only things that I know are that the public is able to comment at the Board meeting and at CityCounsel meeting but not sure if their comments have any impact unless Board and Counsel membersallow them to.

Also, if issue isn’t brought up at City Counsel meeting by Counsel members, I am not sure if a privatecitizen can bring it up (not sure of rules).

On the other hand, it is possible that someone might be able to file a lawsuit, but I don’t have muchknowledge in this area.

I will ask Delon, and we can go from there.

Thanks!

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:36 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: voicemail

She has a hypothetical question of what if someone is opposed to the Crossroads Hollywood Project.Can that person cause the WSA to be not approved at the Board Meeting, or once it is approved, canthe person appeal for the approval to be reconsidered?

Anyone can attend the board meeting and make comments at during the speaker session, and that mayresult in delaying of the WSA approval, but once the Board approves it, I don’t think someone canappeal…? Does that sound about right, or do you have anything to add? Can someone appeal duringthe 2 week period after the Board approves it?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:22 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: FW: voicemail

I received a voicemail from Noel Fleming. She just said she has some questions about WSAs. I’ll callher when I get a chance today.

From: Noel Hyun Fleming [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:09 PMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: voicemail

Date: Wed Jul 13 2016 07:27:29 PDTAttachments: image001.jpg

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.627993

Page 7266 of 8813

Hi Jin,I just left you a voicemail. I have some basic questions about Water Supply Assessments. Please callme when you can. Thank you.

[cid:[email protected]]

Noel Hyun Fleming, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

633 W. 5th Street | Suite 3200

213.694.3133

direct

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2005

310.801.3161

cell

download vcard<http://viz.me/nflem/t/7>

213.694.3101

fax

linerlaw.com<http://www.linerlaw.com>

Privileged and Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addresseeindicated in this message (or Responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may notcopy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindlynotify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consentto internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in thismessage that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given norendorsed by it.

***PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL***

Page 7267 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.627993-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Jul 13 07:27:29 PDT 2016

Page 7268 of 8813

of 8813



To All,

Would 8am be okay, or sooner?

Regarding highlight, we are only waiting to hear back from Val A. on posting of UC Davis report onwebsite and also a license agreement for UC Davis to use data in report for unrelated project. I sentreminder to him today.

Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:26 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report



Thanks.








Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.586642

Page 7270 of 8813





















* Task Complete



Page 7271 of 8813

of 8813



Thanks.

What was highlight below about from EIR consultant? This came after board meeting?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 2:54 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report



* Water Energy Nexus: Worked on comparing LADWP's EI for Distribution, Wastewater Treatmentand Wastewater Pumping to UC Davis'.


* Farah Lavergne of LASAN provided WW Treatment and Pumping energy and flow data that sheprovided to UC Davis. - 7/29/16

* Adjusted WW Treatment and Pumping EI calc by LADWP and UC Davis, identified reasons forLADWP Treatment and Distribution EI, and briefed Delon. - 8/3/16

* Asked UC Davis questions on LADWP EI analysis for FYE 12 to FYE 13. Waiting for Andy toreturn from vacation to respond. - 8/3/16

* Val N. located some files where sum of Pump Station energy and number of days covered workwas saved. -8/4/16

* Prepared an outline for presentation to brief Dave and Penny on UC Davis study results, andstarted working on the slides. - 8/4/16

* LASAN data used for WW EI calculation : Need to document sources, detail of data (datereceived, covering what, etc.)

Worktech- Jin


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.527028

Page 7273 of 8813

* Staff continues to provide assistance to Water Resources staff on Worktech related issues

* Need to add a list of staff as approvers, etc. in Worktech - 7/29/16.Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA - Jin (Target Board Date: 8/2/16)

* WSA was approved at the Board Meeting. - 8/3/16

* Responded to EI consultant's question on how cooling demand was estimated. - 8/3-4/16

* Need to prepare a transmittal letter.

WSA for the Fig Project - Jin

* Received hand-delivered WSA request letter and check. - 7/26/16

* Saved scanned WSA request letter in Galaxy, and gave the check to Andrei. - 8/2/16

West Hollywood WSA - Jin

* Need to research whether 2012 SGF applies to W. Hollywood and details of W. Hollywood'sconservation requirements. No work done this week (8/4/16)

Page 7274 of 8813


Subject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet

Middle column is excluding parking structure demands?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 9:10 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet

Please disregard 0.40 gpd/sf for 1020 S. Figueroa Project. I used the total year 2016 net add'l waterdemand by mistake. Please see the summary below.

I don't see any trend, and I think it is because gpd/sf would depend on the type of proposed land uses.Some projects have more commercial, and some projects have more residential, etc. I think the middlecolumn (Project Buildout - parking gpd/ Project Buildout - parking sf) would be the most accuratecomparison. SOLA was approved in June 2015.Z:\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water Supply Assessments\WSA MonitoringSpreadsheet 1 2016 07 08.xlsx<file:///\\Galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\WSA%20Monitoring%20Spreadsheet%201%202016%2007%2008.xlsx>

WSA Projects

Project Buildout gpd/ Project Buildout sf

Project Buildout - parking gpd/ Project Buildout - parking sf

Net Add'l gpd / Project Buildout sf

SOLA Village

0.10

0.14

0.08

Academy Square

0.10

0.20

Date: Tue Aug 02 2016 09:22:43 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.522819

Page 7275 of 8813

0.09

Jefferson & La Cienega

0.10

0.17

0.10

NOHO West

0.09

0.16

0.09

LAMP

0.03

0.11

0.02

1020 S. Figueroa St

0.17

0.21

0.15

Crossroads Hollywood

0.15

0.28

0.15

Units are in (gpd/sf)


I got 0.40 gpd/sf for 1020 S. Figueroa Project. That is (net add'l water demand + existing waterdemand) over (indoor sf + parking sf + landscape sf).

I'll work on previous WSA, but we might not have indoor sf info available for all projects.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 6:59 AM

Page 7276 of 8813

To: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet

We would need to go through each WSA to obtain sf and add a couple more columns.

Also, we might want to break down indoor vs. outdoor so stats don't get skewed.

Jin, do we always have over-all sf, including hotel and residential?

Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 6:19 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: wsa tracking spreadsheet

Is there a way to see in the tracking spreadsheet, over last couple of years, on a unit basis per project,say for example AF or gallon / s.f. (?), how it's trending?

In theory, it should be going downward due to more stricter ordinance + voluntary.

Let me know what you think and would like to have stat for meeting today if possible.

Thanks.

Page 7277 of 8813



Correct. Middle column excludes parking demand and parking sf.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 9:23 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet





WSA Projects




SOLA Village

0.10

0.14

0.08


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.522821

Page 7278 of 8813

Academy Square

0.10

0.20

0.09


0.10

0.17

0.10

NOHO West

0.09

0.16

0.09

LAMP

0.03

0.11

0.02

1020 S. Figueroa St

0.17

0.21

0.15


0.15

0.28

0.15



Page 7279 of 8813



From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 6:59 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet




Thanks





Thanks.

Page 7280 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.492376-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Fri Jul 15 06:04:03 PDT 2016

Page 7283 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.492561-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Fri Jul 15 06:43:12 PDT 2016

Page 7288 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.488850-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Jul 13 07:45:32 PDT 2016

Page 7292 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7296 of 8813

of 8813

From: Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Earl,

Below is a summary of my work activities for the last week:

2015 UWMP Update

* Completed 1st draft revisions of Chapter 8. Submitted to Earl for review on 7/27/15 - 7/27/15.

* Made minor revisions to Chapter 12 - 8/13/15.

* Reviewed a newly released DWR paper called "Perspective and Guidelines for Climate ChangeAnalysis." Concluded that It is not directly applicable to the UWMP - 9/10/15.

* No new updates.

Agreement 47288-5 - Strategic Planning Services

* Received and reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science following the conferencecall - 4/1/15.

* Reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science - 5/4/15.

* Provided a summary of open issues for an internal LADWP meeting - 7/6/15.

* Assisted in development of Task Order Proposal #2. TO Proposal #2 was submitted to clericalstaff for processing on 10/30/15 - 10/30/15.

Neenach Turnout and DWR/AVEK/MWD agreements

* Preparing documentation and information for a meeting with MWD on 06/02/15 - 5/28/15.

* Completed preparation of handouts and other information for the meeting with MWD on 06/02/15- 6/02/15.

* Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15.

* No new updates.

Palmdale Water District GW Banking

Date: Wed Nov 04 2015 09:36:30 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.156666

Page 7300 of 8813

* Met with Sarah to discuss how to address action items from the meeting on 9/10/15. Started to workon addressing the items - 9/16/15.

* Continued to work on the analysis - 10/6/15.

* Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis. Completed costs and benefits for 7 differentscenarios - 10/29/15.

* Completed calculations for the analysis. A meeting to discuss the analysis is scheduled for11/13/15 - 11/3/15.

Cost Impact analysis from litigation between SDCWA and MWD

* Delon asked me to review and make updates to an existing analysis of cost impact to MWDmember agencies from rate litigation between SDCWA and MWD. I began to work on the analysis -3/11/15. * Continued to work on the analysis. Was unable to identify all SWP elements of System Access andSystem Power Rates to complete the analysis - 3/18/15.

* No new updates.

WSA for NoHo West Project

* Provided some additional information about ordinance and voluntary conservation percentages.Made revisions to the tracking spreadsheet. The WSA approved by the Board on 10/6/15 - 10/6/15.

* Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15.

* Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15.

* The transmittal letter was submitted to clerical staff for processing. Awaiting the processing.

Miscellaneous

* Completed review of NOP for Crossroads Hollywood - 11/02/15.

Thanks.


Page 7301 of 8813



Very good!

Please incorporate additional comments and reply to Delon.

Thanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:46 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet

Please review.

>From Barlow (#68) to Sears (#88), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinancesavings by (net add'l + voluntary savings + ordinance savings). - Existing demand was subtracted out ofdenominator.

>From LACCCTF (#89) to NOHO West (#93), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving theordinance savings by the Table 1 Baseline, which excluded savings due to Ordinance No. 180822accounted for in the current SGF. - This correctly added existing demand back into denominator, buterroneously excluded embedded ordinance savings from SGFs, the latter of which were included in thenumerator.

>From LAMP (#94) and on, the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinance savings bythe Base Demand. - This "Conservation Baseline" was the final correction that added embeddedordinance savings in SGFs back into denominator.


Delon,

Yes to all.

Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, Jin


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.634079

Page 7302 of 8813








Thanks.


Thanks Jin.





4.7% out of 20.0% Ordinance Savings is due to Ordinance 184248 (effective 6/6/16). It does notnecessarily mean prior to Ordinance 184248 was adopted, developers would have voluntarily

Page 7303 of 8813

committed to the same level of conservation that is now required. For example, Ord. 184248 loweredthe maximum flow rate of showerhead from 2.0 gpm to 1.8 gpm. Now developers are required to install1.8 gpm or less for showerhead, but prior to the adoption of Ord. 184248, not all developers voluntarilycommitted to use 1.8 gpm showerheads.


Delon,









Page 7304 of 8813


Subject: RE: Crossroads WSA schedule

Earl, do you want me to change the board date to 8/2?

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:28 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Crossroads WSA schedule



Thanks.





3/31/16


4/15/16


4/20/16


4/26/16



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.618253

Page 7305 of 8813

6/1/16


6/1/16


6/1/16


6/8/16


6/15/16


6/21/16

Legal stamp

6/23/16


6/30/16


7/6/16

BAR Meeting

7/19/16

Board Meeting(90 days from 3/31/16 is 6/29/16)



Page 7306 of 8813


Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:29 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Yes








WSA - General - Jin





Page 7307 of 8813













Page 7308 of 8813



Yes to the first two questions.

For the third question,

>From Barlow (#68) to Sears (#88), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinancesavings by (net add'l + voluntary savings + ordinance savings). - Existing demand was subtracted out ofdenominator.

>From LACCCTF (#89) to NOHO West (#93), the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving theordinance savings by the Table 1 Baseline, which excluded savings due to Ordinance No. 180822accounted for in the current SGF. - This correctly added existing demand back into denominator, buterroneously excluded embedded ordinance savings from SGFs, the latter of which were included in thenumerator.

>From LAMP (#94) and on, the % ordinance savings was calculated by diving the ordinance savings bythe Base Demand. - This "Conservation Baseline" was the final correction that added embeddedordinance savings in SGFs back into denominator.



* Numbering on far left most column starting with Lexington project, that's just when we startedcalc / tracking of voluntary savings?

* Column C, net increase/decrease over existing, that's the approved amount in the WSA boardpackage, correct?

* Ordinance savings under column F we started tracking with Barlow was corrected methodology?




Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.503108

Page 7309 of 8813

Thanks.


Thanks Jin.







Delon,





From: Kwan, Delon

Page 7310 of 8813

Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:31 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA fact sheet




Page 7311 of 8813


Subject: RE: Crossroads WSA schedule

Jin,

Let's try to complete package today and then sit down and review together.

If we can get package to Legal tomorrow, we might be able to make 6/23 date and stay on schedule.

Thanks


From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:28 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: Crossroads WSA schedule



Thanks.






Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.447804

Page 7315 of 8813

3/31/16


4/15/16


4/20/16


4/26/16


6/1/16


6/1/16


6/1/16


6/8/16


6/15/16


6/21/16

Legal stamp

6/23/16


6/30/16


7/6/16

BAR Meeting

7/19/16

Board Meeting

Page 7316 of 8813

(90 days from 3/31/16 is 6/29/16)




Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:29 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Yes







Page 7317 of 8813


WSA - General - Jin

















Page 7318 of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Cc: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>

Subject: RE: Crossroads WSA Commitment Letter

Thanks.

Can you forward me the last set of scope questions / responses communicated via email.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:51 AMTo: Kwan, DelonCc: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: FW: Crossroads WSA Commitment Letter

Below is the latest communication between the Crossroads team and us, which was our first timecommenting on the conservation letter (Z:\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\WaterSupply Assessments\WSA Projects\Crossroads Hollywood Project\Water Conservation\CrossroadsHollywood Project - Draft Water Conservation Commitment Letter 2016 05 27.pdf<file:///\\Galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\WSA%20Projects\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project\Water%20Conservation\Crossroads%20Hollywood%20Project%20-%20Draft%20Water%20Conservation%20Commitment%20Letter%202016%2005%2027.pdf>)

I have the draft scope confirmation request letter ready, but I need to first finish calculating the waterdemand to make sure the fixture count provided does not result in higher ordinance savings than thebaseline water demand.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:47 PMTo: 'Madonna Marcelo'Cc: Alejandro Huerta ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Moosbrugger,Earl; Kyndra Joy Casper; Stephanie Eyestone-JonesSubject: RE: Crossroads WSA Commitment Letter

Hello Madonna,

I have the following questions/comments after reviewing the May 27, 2016 version draft waterconservation commitment letter:

- Currently the Energy Star residential dishwasher is 3.5 gallons per cycle (lower than 5.8 gallonsper cycle committed in the draft water conservation commitment letter)

- What is the Irrigation Efficiency of the bubblers for the trees?

- Would the Applicant consider committing to installing and using automatic pool covers?

Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 06:53:54 PDTAttachments: image001.jpg

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.427480

Page 7319 of 8813

- How will the water captured by cistern and water treated by primary (on-site) waste watertreatment systems be reused? If any of the water to be captured or treated will displace potable wateruse on the Project, do you have any preliminary estimate on the amount of the water? What phase isthe cistern and waste water treatment design in (conceptual phase, design phase, etc.)?

- Does the plumbing fixture count in the table in the draft water conservation commitment letterinclude plumbing fixtures in the 50,000 sf to be retained? If so, what is the number of fixtures in the50,000 sf to be retained (x toilets, x urinals, etc.)

Alternately: Our estimate shows assuming all 50,000 sf to be converted to be Retail (as opposed to allRestaurant or partly Retail and partly Restaurant) results in a more conservative water demandestimate. Total buildout Retail/Commercial is 101,800 sf (61,800 sf Retail + 40,000 sf Supermarket).50,000 sf out of 101,800 sf is 0.49. Is it acceptable to apply this ratio (1-0.49) to BuildoutRetail/Commercial fixture counts (53 toilets, 2 urinals, 53 bath sink faucets, etc.), to estimate the NetNew Retail/Commercial fixture count to be 27 toilets, 1 urinal, 27 bath sink faucets, etc.?

- What are the toilet and urinal flow rates in the 50,000 sf to be retained (for example, 1.6 gallonsper flush toilets and 1.0 gallon per flush urinals)?If unable to provide flow rate of toilets and urinals current in the 50,000 sf: About what year were theplumbing fixtures in the 50,000 sf last replaced?

- Only 253 residential clothes washers are proposed in 950 residential units. Please confirm thatthe 697 units without clothes washers are expected to purchase and install their own (as opposed totaking laundry out to a coin operated laundromat outside of the Project area).

- For Retail/Commercial, did you mean 2 Residential type Dishwashers (not Commercial typeDishwashers)?

- For Hotel Rooms, did you mean 17 Residential type Clothes type washers (not Commercial typeClothes washers)?

- For Hotel Rooms, did you mean 17 Residential type Dishwashers (not Commercial typeDishwashers)?

Thank you.


From: Madonna Marcelo [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:11 AMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Alejandro Huerta ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Moosbrugger,Earl; Kyndra Joy Casper; Stephanie Eyestone-JonesSubject: Crossroads WSA Commitment Letter

Hi Jin,

Attached is our draft WSA Commitment Letter. Per your instructions, we will have the letter on the

Page 7320 of 8813

applicant's letterhead once you accept the attached draft letter. Please let us know if you have anyquestions or comments or if you need anything else.

Thanks!

Madonna

Madonna MarceloPrincipal Planner


6701 Center Drive West, Suite 900Los Angeles, California 90045T (424) 207-5337F (424) 207-5349Email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Statement of Confidentiality. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidentialand are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmissionis sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received thistransmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or phone anddelete this message and its attachments, if any.

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Page 7321 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.427480-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Thu Jun 02 06:53:54 PDT 2016

Page 7322 of 8813

of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Falcon, Penny <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: FW: LADWP Board Agenda for 8-2-16

Looks like Jacot's item is right after energy storage discussion.

From: Flores, VivianSent: Friday, July 29, 2016 1:47 PMTo: Gastelum, Albert; Grime, Karyn; Harasick, Richard; Mejia, Nelson; Pettijohn, David; Rowghani,Susan; Session, Keith (Manager); Spacht, Julie; Gonzalez, Lupe; Kay, Maria; Rayas-glen, Yvonne;Rodriguez, Arlene; Seller, Wilaiwan; Yu, JennifferSubject: LADWP Board Agenda for 8-2-16

Attached is Tuesday's Board agenda. Meeting starts at 10a.

Thank you,


From: Moschos, BarbaraSent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:16 PMSubject: LADWP Board Agenda for 8-2-16

FYI - LADWP Board agenda for Tuesday, August 2, 2016.

NOTE: Regular Board meetings now start at 10:00 a.m.

Barbara E. MoschosBoard Secretary(213) 367-1351

Date: Tue Aug 02 2016 07:12:41 PDTAttachments: Agenda 8-2-16.pdf

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.522341

Page 7324 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.522341-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: Agenda 8-2-16.pdfLast Modified: Tue Aug 02 07:12:41 PDT 2016

Page 7325 of 8813

BOARD OF WATER AND POWER COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Room 1555-H, 111 North Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012

AGENDA

TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2016

10:00 A.M.

Please note that the Board will not vote on any contracts, bid awards, or CEQA items until after 12:30 p.m.

MEL LEVINE, President

WILLIAM W. FUNDERBURK, JR., Vice President

JILL BANKS BARAD, Commissioner

MICHAEL F. FLEMING, Commissioner

CHRISTINA E. NOONAN, Commissioner

BOARD MEETINGS - The Board conducts regular meetings at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as a quorum is present, on the first and third Tuesdays of the month (or on the next business day when a meeting day falls on a legal holiday) in Room 1555-H of the John Ferraro Building (JFB). Special meetings are held at the date, time, and place specified in the meeting notice. Three members of the five-member Board constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Meetings are recorded. Board meetings are conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code § 54950 et seq. Resources: The Brown Act: Open Meetings for Local Legislative Bodies (Cal. Atty. Gen. 2003) (available online at <www.oag.ca.gov/open-meetings>); Open & Public IV: A Guide to the Ralph M. Brown Act (League of Cal. Cities 2d ed. 2010) (available online at <www.cacities.org> search for "Open Meeting IV"). Board meetings are conducted in accordance with the Rules of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (available on online at <www.ladwp.com/board>). Board meetings are presided over by the Board President or, in his/her absence, as provided in Board Rule No. 5. The Board upon request will provide reasonable accommodation to the disabled to ensure equal access to its meetings. To ensure availability, such request should be made 72 hours in advance by contacting the Commission Office at (213) 367-1356 during business hours. MEETING AGENDAS - The agenda for meetings contains a brief general description of the items to be considered. The Board may consider an item not on the agenda only in limited circumstances consistent with the Brown Act. The agenda is posted in the front window to the left (as viewed from the street) of the main entrance of the JFB Building, in the JFB lobby, and outside JFB Room 1555-H at least 72 hours before regular meetings and at least 24 hours before special meetings. The agenda is also available online at <www.ladwp.com/board>. The description of any item displayed on the agenda may be changed subsequent to the electronic posting of the agenda or by Board action at the meeting, but only if consistent with the Brown Act.

Agenda 8-2-16.pdf for Printed Item: 1145 ( Attachment 1 of 1)

Page 7326 of 8813

http://www.oag.ca.gov/open-meetings

http://www.cacities.org/

http://www.ladwp.com/board


OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE BOARD - Before reaching those portions of the agenda where Board action is requested, members of the public will be given an opportunity to address the Board on items of interest within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board (general public comment). Thereafter, members of the public will be given an opportunity to address the Board on any item on the regular agenda prior to or during the Board’s consideration of that item. The same opportunity will be given in open session regarding the closed session agenda prior to commencement of the closed session. Members of the public who wish to speak during general public comment are to complete a speaker card so indicating. Members of the public who wish to speak regarding a particular agenda item or items are to complete a speaker card for each such item. Agendas for special meetings will permit the public to address particular agenda items even where the agenda does not include general public comment. The requirement of public comment on individual items shall not apply if the opportunity for public comment on the item previously had been provided by a Board committee (consisting entirely of Board members at which a quorum was present) to all interested members of the public when it considered the item and the item had not changed substantially since the committee hearing. The Board agenda shall state whether such earlier opportunity for public comment had been duly provided. If the Board President determines that an item has changed substantially since the committee hearing, public comment on the item shall be allowed. (These public comment procedures are in addition to any other hearing requirement specifically imposed by law.) Each speaker is allowed to speak up to two minutes per agenda item, with a five-minute cumulative total to speak on all agenda items. The Presiding Officer shall, however, exercise discretion to determine whether such period of time should be reduced or extended based upon such factors as the length of the agenda or substance of the agenda items, the number of public comment speaker cards submitted, the need for the Board to conclude its business as expeditiously as is practicable, and whether the Board is at risk of losing a quorum, among other factors. Speaker cards will be available at the back of the meeting room. ACCESS BY THE PUBLIC TO DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MEMBERS - Members of the public may inspect documents (other than legally confidential documents) relating to open session items on the agenda distributed to at least a majority of Board members in advance of the meeting or at the meeting. Many of the documents distributed in advance of the meeting will be available online through a link included in the item description on the agenda. Some large documents or documents received too late to link to an agenda item may not be viewable in this manner. Documents (other than confidential documents) distributed during the meeting -- if prepared by the Department, another City department or office, or a Board member – will be made available for inspection during the meeting. Documents may be viewed in the Commission Office (JFB room 1555) prior to or after the meeting. Copies may be obtained in accordance with regular procedures for copying Department records. THE ORDER OF BUSINESS - The order of business for regular meetings typically follows the sequence described below. The Board, however, sometimes considers matters out of order as the Board President may direct. The order of business for special meetings will be determined by the agenda. Thus, some special meeting agendas may follow the organizational format of regular meetings, while other meeting agendas may be limited to but one or several items. 1. Preliminary matters - The Board President will begin the meeting with opening remarks, which are generally followed first by a report by the General Manager and then by comments and requests of members. General public comment will then follow. 2. Policy Discussion and Management reports - In this agenda segment, reports from management and other documents are presented to the Board for information or possible discussion. No action is requested in regard to these items. 3. Closed session agenda - Before going into closed session, the Board will hear from members of the public who have asked to speak on a closed session item. Thereafter, the Board will make any announcements required by law before retiring to closed session. Closed sessions are allowed only for particular subject matters permitted by the Brown Act. The Board agenda will state the provision or provisions of the Brown Act permitting the closed session. After the closed session, the Board will publicly report any action taken in closed session and the vote or abstention thereon of every member present, in accordance with California Government Code § 54957.1. 4. Filed items - In this agenda segment, filed items from management and other documents are presented to the Board for information or possible discussion. No action is requested in regard to these items. 5. Regular agenda -The Regular Agenda consists of items presented for approval, along with Comments from the Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council Resolution or Community Impact Statement filed with the City Clerk which relate to any agenda item listed or being considered on this agenda by the Board. The Board President will announce the items to be considered by the Board. The Board will hear from members of the public who have requested to speak on an item that a speaker card has been submitted. The Board President will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called special. The remaining items in this section will be voted on by the Board with one roll call vote. BOARD ACTIONS - The vote of at least three members is required for the Board to act. With some exceptions, Board actions are not final when taken because, under Los Angeles City Charter § 245, the City Council may assert jurisdiction for possible veto of actions of boards and commissions of City government. Board actions thus become final as provided by Charter § 245.


Page 7327 of 8813

Meeting Agenda Board of Water and Power Commissioners

Tuesday

August 2, 2016 10:00 a.m.

1. Opening remarks by the Commission President on agenda and other items relating to Department operations, and Channel 35 broadcast announcement.

2. Report/Briefing by the General Manager, including Reports from Water, Power and Administrative System Management concerning current matters relating to Department Operations.

3. Comments from Commissioners on agendized items. Requests from Commissioners relating to Departmental operations.

4. Opportunity for the public to address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. (Speakers may be limited in speaking time dependent upon the press of business and number of persons wishing to address the Board.)

5. Comments from Ratepayer Advocate on agendized items.

Policy Discussion

6. Energy Storage Discussion, including DWP’s current Board approved plan, as well as existing and proposed state legislation

Management Reports

7. A. Presentation – Update on LAUSD Bucket Brigade Challenge B. Presentation – Overview of LADWP Real Estate Program C. Presentation – J.D. Power Market Strategies International

Closed Session

8.

The Board shall recess into closed session for a conference with legal counsel regarding the items set forth in Attachment A.

THE BOARD MEETING WILL RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AT 12:30 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FOR APPROVAL:

Filed Items

9. (From General Manager) Monthly report of activities for the following: 1. Chief Operating Officer – June 2016 2. Power System – June 2016 3. Renewable Portfolio Standard Projects Update – June 2016


Page 7328 of 8813

10. Discussion with Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council Resolution or Community Impact Statement filed with the City Clerk which relate to any agenda item listed or being considered on this agenda for the Water and Power Board.

Election of Officers

11. Election of Officers

Items for Approval

12. Recommendation for approval of the minutes of the July 19, 2016, Special Meeting of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners.

13. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Engineering and Technical Services) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 541 for 38kV SF6 Insulated Switchgear. Award to OneSource Distributors for a period of one year with two one-year renewal options and an amount not to exceed $71,483,445.

14. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Engineering and Technical Services) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 7652 for 525-kV Single-Phase Shunt Reactors for Various Switching Stations. Award to Taikai Electric, Inc. for a one-time purchase and an amount not to exceed $2,119,360.

15. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Engineering and Technical Services) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 7615 for Generator Step-Up Transformers for Castaic Power Plant Units 1 and 2. Award to Taikai Electric, Inc. for a one-time purchase and an amount not to exceed $2,058,550.

16. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Construction, Maintenance, and Operations) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 7453 for Concrete Saw Trailers. Award to TriVan Truck Body LLC for a one-time purchase and an amount not to exceed $399,982.

17. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Construction, Maintenance, and Operations and Senior Assistant General Manager – Water System) (Approved by General Manager) Contract Nos. 626A and 626B (Amendment No. 1) for Bare Rental of Tanks, Pumps, Pipes, Fittings and Accessories with BakerCorp and Rain for Rent, Inc. Amendment No. 1 will increase Contract No. 626A amount limit by $2,954,886, and Contract No. 626B amount limit by $2,501,954. There is no change to the duration of the contracts.


Page 7329 of 8813

18. (Recommended by Senior Assistant General Manager – Water System) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 7618 108-Inch Butterfly Valves for the Los Angeles Reservoir Ultraviolet Disinfection Plant. Award to Henry Pratt Company LLC for a one-time purchase and an amount not to exceed $768,112.

19. (Recommended by Senior Assistant General Manager – Water System) (Approved by General Manager) Memorandum of Agreement with Council for Watershed Health. This agreement is for a term of three years and at no cost to LADWP.

20. (Recommended by Senior Assistant General Manager – Water System) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution authorizing the Water Supply Assessment for the Crossroads Hollywood Project located within the Hollywood Community Plan area of the City of Los Angeles.

21. (Recommended by Senior Assistant General Manager – Water System) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution authorizing execution of Contract No. 47289-5 (Amendment No. 2) for eSTREAM Analysis Model with Watercourse Engineering, Inc. Amendment No. 2 will increase the contract amount by $150,000 and extend the contract term by five years. City Council approval is required.

22. (Recommended by Chief Operating Officer) (Approved by General Manager) Contract No. 7454 for Aerial Boom Trucks. Award to Los Angeles Truck Center, LLC for a one-time purchase and an amount not to exceed $11,736,108.

23. (Recommended by Chief Operating Officer) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution authorizing execution of Optical Fiber Lease Agreement No. FO-800-03/2016 and Short Form IRU-01 Lease Agreement No. FO-801-03/2016 with Beers Enterprises, LLC for Lease of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Optical Fibers.

24. (Recommended by Chief Operating Officer) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution authorizing execution of Cooperative Purchasing Agreement No. 47413 for Professional Programming Services for MyDWP Employee Portal and FileNet Document and Records Management System. Award to 3Di, Inc. for a term of approximately 15 months and an amount not to exceed $500,000.

25. (Recommended by Chief Operating Officer) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution approving and ratifying Purchase Order No. 49254-5 (Amendment No. 1) for LADWP’s Social Media Presence with Social Stream Media, LLC. This amendment will increase the contract amount by $54,012 and extend the contract term by seven months.


Page 7330 of 8813

26. (Recommended by Chief Sustainability and Economic Development Officer and Executive Director - Power System Engineering and Technical Services) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution recommending Approval of the Sylmar Ground Return System Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report.

27. (Recommended by Retirement Plan Manager) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendment to the Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan to Eliminate the Reserve for Investment Gains and Losses Account.

28. (Recommended by Retirement Plan Manager) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendment to the Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan to Correct Classes Eligible for Tier 1 Membership.

29. (Recommended by Retirement Plan Manager) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution Approving the Proposed Plan Amendments to the Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan to Address Issues Encountered in the Administration of Tier 2 Provisions.

30. (Recommended by Executive Director - Power System Engineering and Technical Services) (Approved by General Manager) Resolution authorizing execution of Agreement No. 47408-6 for Owner’s Representative Professional Services to Support Repowering Projects Related to Once-Through Cooling Regulation Compliance, Renewable Generation, and Transmission Line Projects. Award to WorleyParsons Group, Inc. for a term of three years and an amount not to exceed $25,000,000.


Page 7331 of 8813

ATTACHMENT A – CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

8. The Board shall recess into closed session for a conference with legal counsel regarding:

A. Existing litigation in the following matters:

1. Nancy Baron v. LADWP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC586008, pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 54956.9 of the California Government Code.

2. Elizabeth Fels v. LADWP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC525775, pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 54956.9 of the California Government Code.

3. City of Los Angeles v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP (PwC), Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC574690, pursuant to Section 54956.9 (d)(1) of the California Government Code.

4. City of Los Angeles v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, et al., Superior Court of California, County of Inyo, Case No. 12908, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

5. City of Los Angeles v. California Air Resources Board, et al., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, Case No. 34-2013-80001451-CU-WM-GDS, pursuant to Section 54956.9 (d)(1) of the California Government Code.

6. Macias, et al. v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC594049, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

7. Sharon Bransford, Steven Shrager and Rachel Tash v. LADWP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC565618, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

8. Daniel Morski, et al. v. LADWP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC56872, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

9. Haley Fontaine, et al. v. LADWP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC571644, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

10. Yaar Kimhi v. The City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC536272, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)91) of the California Government Code.

11. Jones v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC577267, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code.

B. Anticipated litigation in the following matters:


Page 7332 of 8813

1. Discussion regarding significant exposure to litigation in three matters pursuant to Subdivision (d)(2) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code, including the following identified matter:

a. In the Matter of Great Basin Unified Air District Order for Abatement No. 110317-01.

2. Discussion regarding initiation of litigation (2 cases), pursuant to subdivision (d)(4) of section 54956.9 of the California Government Code.

C. Conference with Labor Negotiators:

1. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, the Board will meet in closed session with the Department’s labor negotiators (the Department’s General Manager) concerning labor negotiations with the following employee bargaining representatives: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18

2. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, the Board will meet in closed session with the Department’s labor negotiators (the Department’s General Manager) concerning labor negotiations with non-represented managers.

D. Consultation with General Manager Marcie L. Edwards of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (including security operations) regarding security issues pertaining to the essential public services (water and electric service), pursuant to Section 54957 (a) of the California Government Code.

The Board shall publicly report any action taken in closed session and the vote or abstention of every member present thereon, in accordance with Section 54957.1 of the California Government Code.


Page 7333 of 8813

From: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Villegas, Rafael <[email protected]>Cc:


FYI



Thank you,






Date: Fri Jul 29 2016 13:47:48 PDTAttachments: Agenda 8-2-16.pdf

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.519341

Page 7334 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.519341-000001Owner: Rayas-glen, Yvonne <[email protected]>Filename: Agenda 8-2-16.pdfLast Modified: Fri Jul 29 13:47:48 PDT 2016

Page 7335 of 8813



AGENDA


10:00 A.M.









Page 7336 of 8813







Page 7337 of 8813


Tuesday

August 2, 2016 10:00 a.m.






Policy Discussion


Management Reports


Closed Session

8.



Filed Items



Page 7338 of 8813




Items for Approval








Page 7339 of 8813










Page 7340 of 8813







Page 7341 of 8813

















Page 7342 of 8813










Page 7343 of 8813



FYI...item posted, Crossroads WSA is item 20



Thank you,






Date: Fri Jul 29 2016 13:51:00 PDTAttachments: Agenda 8-2-16.pdf

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.519357

Page 7344 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.519357-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: Agenda 8-2-16.pdfLast Modified: Fri Jul 29 13:51:00 PDT 2016

Page 7345 of 8813



AGENDA


10:00 A.M.









Page 7346 of 8813







Page 7347 of 8813


Tuesday

August 2, 2016 10:00 a.m.






Policy Discussion


Management Reports


Closed Session

8.



Filed Items



Page 7348 of 8813




Items for Approval








Page 7349 of 8813










Page 7350 of 8813







Page 7351 of 8813

















Page 7352 of 8813










Page 7353 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.415893-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: WSA Template for Legal Review (Acpt Chngs) 160523.docxLast Modified: Tue May 24 14:31:25 PDT 2016

Page 7355 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.712509-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Feb 15 08:49:13 PST 2017

Page 7400 of 8813

of 8813



Early,

Weekly Summary for this week


* Discussed general WSA process/overview with Andrei on 05/31 (2.5 hours)

* Discussed general WSA process/overview with Early on 06/01 (2 hours)

* Scheduled to discuss Crossroads WSA calculations with Jin

Miscellaneous

* Search Docs in 1415 on 5/31/16 (3 hrs)

* Read UWMP Ch 8 and Ch 12 while answering questions about MWD tour from Earl based on mytour notes on 5/27, 5/30, 5/31

* Jin trained how to process a USR (1 hour)

* Researched water demand methodology for pools and discussed with Jin on 06/01 (4 hours)

* Scheduled to read UWMP Ch 11

* Scheduled to further develop water demand methodology for pools

* Scheduled to locate, print and read 10 year CIP


Earl,





Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.705268

Page 7402 of 8813

Miscellaneous









Earl,




Miscellaneous








Perfect!


Page 7403 of 8813

Thanks!


Earl,




Water Energy Nexus



Miscellaneous









Page 7404 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Aghakhani, Ryan <[email protected]>Cc:


This looks good.

Thanks for keeping it simple.


Earl,




Miscellaneous









Earl,

Date: Thu May 26 2016 11:19:15 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.702366

Page 7405 of 8813




Miscellaneous








Perfect!


Thanks!


Earl,




Water Energy Nexus



Page 7406 of 8813

Miscellaneous









Page 7407 of 8813



Jin,

Please remove highlighted item from your weekly summary.

Thanks

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 7:08 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

To All,



Thanks




Thanks.




Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.648540

Page 7408 of 8813























Page 7409 of 8813



* Task Complete



Page 7410 of 8813



OK. Thank you.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 7:42 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Jin,

Please remove highlighted item from your weekly summary.

Thanks


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.

From: Hwang, Jin


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.648547

Page 7411 of 8813

Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:18 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report





















Page 7412 of 8813






* Task Complete



Page 7413 of 8813



I don't remember coming across such case, but I may not have paid too much attention to it. We canlook out for it in the future.


See below. To clarify my last question sent, have we ever taken this information into consideration inadjusting hotel water demand, and have we ever had a case where there were a high percentage ofsuites, or is the idea to track it in case we ever do come across this case? I just figured that with all ofthe WSAs we have done in the past that we probably would have already come across this case, but Icould be wrong.

Thanks







Jin,

If we did discover that Hotel rooms had a high number of suites and/or that some had kitchens and


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.632711

Page 7414 of 8813

some didn't, how would this affect our calculations?

Thanks






What do you think?


Earl,


Page 7415 of 8813


Page 7424 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7429 of 8813

of 8813


Subject: RE: voicemail

OK. Thank you.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 7:27 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: voicemail

Jin,

The only things that I know are that the public is able to comment at the Board meeting and at CityCounsel meeting but not sure if their comments have any impact unless Board and Counsel membersallow them to.

Also, if issue isn’t brought up at City Counsel meeting by Counsel members, I am not sure if a privatecitizen can bring it up (not sure of rules).

On the other hand, it is possible that someone might be able to file a lawsuit, but I don’t have muchknowledge in this area.

I will ask Delon, and we can go from there.

Thanks!

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:36 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: voicemail

She has a hypothetical question of what if someone is opposed to the Crossroads Hollywood Project.Can that person cause the WSA to be not approved at the Board Meeting, or once it is approved, canthe person appeal for the approval to be reconsidered?

Anyone can attend the board meeting and make comments at during the speaker session, and that mayresult in delaying of the WSA approval, but once the Board approves it, I don’t think someone canappeal…? Does that sound about right, or do you have anything to add? Can someone appeal duringthe 2 week period after the Board approves it?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:22 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: FW: voicemail

I received a voicemail from Noel Fleming. She just said she has some questions about WSAs. I’ll call

Date: Wed Jul 13 2016 07:31:16 PDTAttachments: image001.jpg

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.628003

Page 7431 of 8813

her when I get a chance today.

From: Noel Hyun Fleming [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:09 PMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: voicemail

Hi Jin,I just left you a voicemail. I have some basic questions about Water Supply Assessments. Please callme when you can. Thank you.


Noel Hyun Fleming, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

633 W. 5th Street | Suite 3200

213.694.3133

direct

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2005

310.801.3161

cell

download vcard<http://viz.me/nflem/t/7>

213.694.3101

fax

linerlaw.com<http://www.linerlaw.com>

Privileged and Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addresseeindicated in this message (or Responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may notcopy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindlynotify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consentto internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in thismessage that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given norendorsed by it.

***PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL***

Page 7432 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.628003-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Wed Jul 13 07:31:16 PDT 2016

Page 7433 of 8813

of 8813



And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc.

Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 6:38 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Was there a pump station data set that you found yesterday following our discussion that we can look atand plot how EI varies with flow over a certain period?

In addition, was there a diagram in the report or past presentation that you found that can illustrate theconcern / deficiency we had with their modeling analyses on accounting for flow / conserved water

If you have questions or need clarification, please see me.

I'll need to reschedule briefing with Dave/Penny, and need to have better idea when presentation will beready.

Let me know status this morning.

Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:07 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

8 am is OK.


To All,

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 08:36:50 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588339

Page 7435 of 8813



Thanks




Thanks.













Page 7436 of 8813















* Task Complete



Page 7437 of 8813








Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:26 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, Earl

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 06:37:37 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.587637

Page 7438 of 8813




Thanks.

















Page 7439 of 8813











* Task Complete



Page 7440 of 8813



8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.





Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.586843

Page 7441 of 8813
























Page 7442 of 8813

* Task Complete



Page 7443 of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Cc:


I'll leave up to you to see if further future tracking is needed.

At a rolled up level, can't really see trends, not sure about a residential / commercial levels (postordinance & voluntary savings)?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 9:27 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet

Correct. Middle column excludes parking demand and parking sf.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 9:23 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet





WSA Projects


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.522824

Page 7444 of 8813




SOLA Village

0.10

0.14

0.08

Academy Square

0.10

0.20

0.09


0.10

0.17

0.10

NOHO West

0.09

0.16

0.09

LAMP

0.03

0.11

0.02

1020 S. Figueroa St

0.17

0.21

0.15


Page 7445 of 8813

0.15

0.28

0.15





From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 6:59 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Hwang, JinSubject: RE: wsa tracking spreadsheet




Thanks





Thanks.

Page 7446 of 8813


Page 7450 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7455 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7460 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7465 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7471 of 8813

of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: FW: Weekly Summary

FYI Only - I will compile summaries later, but I thought I would let you know how Ryan was trained tosubmit weekly summaries and what his reports look like.

That's all

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 4:33 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Summary

Early,

Weekly Summary for this week


* Discussed general WSA process/overview with Andrei on 05/31 (2.5 hours)

* Discussed general WSA process/overview with Early on 06/01 (2 hours)

* Scheduled to discuss Crossroads WSA calculations with Jin

Miscellaneous

* Search Docs in 1415 on 5/31/16 (3 hrs)

* Read UWMP Ch 8 and Ch 12 while answering questions about MWD tour from Earl based on mytour notes on 5/27, 5/30, 5/31

* Jin trained how to process a USR (1 hour)

* Researched water demand methodology for pools and discussed with Jin on 06/01 (4 hours)

* Scheduled to read UWMP Ch 11

* Scheduled to further develop water demand methodology for pools

* Scheduled to locate, print and read 10 year CIP

From: Aghakhani, RyanSent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:53 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl

Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 08:21:45 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.427907

Page 7473 of 8813


Earl,




Miscellaneous









Earl,




Miscellaneous







Page 7474 of 8813


Perfect!


Thanks!


Earl,




Water Energy Nexus



Miscellaneous








Ryan AghakhaniResources Development and Supply Assessment GroupWater System Executive Office / Water Resources Section

Page 7475 of 8813

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012

Page 7476 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Andrei,

Would you please provide a weekly summary for the days you were here last week: Nov. 5 & 6.

Thanks

From: Tcharssov, AndreiSent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:37 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Earl,


2015 UWMP Update




* No new updates.







Date: Fri Nov 13 2015 11:01:18 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.158278

Page 7477 of 8813




* No new updates.








* No new updates.






Miscellaneous


Thanks.

Andrei Tcharssov

Page 7478 of 8813

LADWP Water Resources Development111 N. Hope Street, Room 1450Los Angeles, CA 90012(213) 367-2155

Page 7479 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Correction: 4, 5 & 6.

Thanks!

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Friday, November 13, 2015 11:01 AMTo: Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Andrei,

Would you please provide a weekly summary for the days you were here last week: Nov. 5 & 6.

Thanks

From: Tcharssov, AndreiSent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:37 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: Work Activities 10/28/15 thru 11/3/15

Earl,


2015 UWMP Update




* No new updates.



Date: Fri Nov 13 2015 11:02:28 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.158280

Page 7480 of 8813








* No new updates.








* No new updates.






Page 7481 of 8813

Miscellaneous


Thanks.


Page 7482 of 8813


Page 7488 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7495 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.790180-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Thu Feb 16 06:27:22 PST 2017

Page 7502 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.790188-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Thu Feb 16 07:07:11 PST 2017

Page 7509 of 8813

of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.790191-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.jpgLast Modified: Thu Feb 16 07:14:08 PST 2017

Page 7516 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7528 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7535 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7541 of 8813

of 8813



Please see below. I'll come over to discuss further.


And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc. There are some missing data and energy data are only provided monthly, not hourly like flowdata, but overall, I think pump station data is adequate.

Thanks.



For Santa Ynez PS, I used the existing monthly energy data and hourly flow data converted to monthlyto calculate the monthly EI. Then plotted a graph showing Flow vs. EI, and found no apparent pattern.

Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 10:03:27 PDTAttachments: image003.png

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588546

Page 7543 of 8813

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

Page 7544 of 8813

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142


In addition, was there a diagram in the report or past presentation that you found that can illustrate theconcern / deficiency we had with their modeling analyses on accounting for flow / conserved waterOn UC Davis' LADWP network map, I think we should add Energy to each Pump Station and addassumed Flow in each pressure zone. Then transfer the assumed Flow and EI info to UC Davis' mapshowing yellow to red pressure zones.




Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:26 AM

Page 7545 of 8813

To: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report



Thanks.

















Page 7546 of 8813











* Task Complete



Page 7547 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.588546-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: image003.pngLast Modified: Fri Aug 26 10:03:27 PDT 2016

Page 7548 of 8813

of 8813



Please see below.


And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc.There are 7 pump stations each with only 1 meter for multiple pumps feeding different pressure zones.For each of 6 of these Pump Stations, we provided 1 set of energy data and 2 different sets of flowdata. I'm not sure how UC Davis apportion the energy to pumps feeding different pressure zones. ForLaurel Canyon (1096), we provided high energy and really low flow data. I think this energy data is forboth pumps, not just for Laurel Canyon feeding 1096 zone. For Laurel Canyon (1424), we provided lowenergy and high flow. This energy is probably not pumping energy. Instead of distributing the highenergy for both pumps, It seems like UC Davis used those provided data for each pump to arrive athigh EI for Laurel Canyon (1096) and low EI for Laurel Canyon (1424).

We should either install energy meters for each pump feeding different pressure zones at these pumpstations, or apportion energy proportionate to the flow, but I'm not sure how accurate the latter wouldbe.

Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588680

Page 7550 of 8813

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

Page 7551 of 8813

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142






Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,

Page 7552 of 8813



Thanks




Thanks.













Page 7553 of 8813















* Task Complete



Page 7554 of 8813


Page 7555 of 8813

of 8813



Do you have a rough diagram markup that can illustrate what you're thinking on the highlight below youcan show me?

Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:25 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Any anomaly you observed with Santa Ynez data set you used? What made you select that station?

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:16 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Please see below.




Thanks.


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588691

Page 7557 of 8813




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

Page 7558 of 8813

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142






Page 7559 of 8813

Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.





Page 7560 of 8813























* Task Complete

Page 7561 of 8813



Page 7562 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.588691-000001Owner: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>Filename: image001.pngLast Modified: Fri Aug 26 11:31:12 PDT 2016

Page 7563 of 8813

of 8813





Please see below.




Thanks.





Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588686

Page 7565 of 8813

Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

Page 7566 of 8813

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142






Thanks.


8 am is OK.

Page 7567 of 8813


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.










Page 7568 of 8813


















* Task Complete



Page 7569 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7571 of 8813

of 8813



FYI - UC Davis' model does not have a data storage location for flow passing through each PS; it onlytracks EI and accumulates. We spoke with UC Davis database person directly on this.

Thanks



Thanks.




Please see below.


And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc.There are 7 pump stations each with only 1 meter for multiple pumps feeding different pressure zones.For each of 6 of these Pump Stations, we provided 1 set of energy data and 2 different sets of flowdata. I'm not sure how UC Davis apportion the energy to pumps feeding different pressure zones. For

Date: Mon Aug 29 2016 10:08:02 PDTAttachments: image001.png

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.590157

Page 7573 of 8813

Laurel Canyon (1096), we provided high energy and really low flow data. I think this energy data is forboth pumps, not just for Laurel Canyon feeding 1096 zone. For Laurel Canyon (1424), we provided lowenergy and high flow. This energy is probably not pumping energy. Instead of distributing the highenergy for both pumps, It seems like UC Davis used those provided data for each pump to arrive athigh EI for Laurel Canyon (1096) and low EI for Laurel Canyon (1424).


Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

Page 7574 of 8813

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142


In addition, was there a diagram in the report or past presentation that you found that can illustrate the

Page 7575 of 8813

concern / deficiency we had with their modeling analyses on accounting for flow / conserved waterOn UC Davis' LADWP network map, I think we should add Energy to each Pump Station and addassumed Flow in each pressure zone. Then transfer the assumed Flow and EI info to UC Davis' mapshowing yellow to red pressure zones.




Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:18 PM

Page 7576 of 8813

To: Moosbrugger, EarlCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report





















Page 7577 of 8813






* Task Complete



Page 7578 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.590157-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: image001.pngLast Modified: Mon Aug 29 10:08:02 PDT 2016

Page 7579 of 8813

of 8813



OK. I'll pick another year at Santa Ynez and plot the graph.

On the LADWP Network map, we can point out that there are 7 PSs with 1 energy meter feeding 2different zones.

On the cumulative EI map, we can point out that the map is color coded for low to high EI only, but thatit needs to be color coded for the energy use in each zone for potential energy savings.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 12:20 PMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

OK thanks.

Maybe can look at another period, color code it, and can see if any variability over time.

Regarding diagram attachment, how does it illustrate deficiency in UC Davis analyses with flow andcalc methodology with conserved water opportunity? Missing your explanation.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 12:05 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report

Out of the 10 highest EI Pump Stations, we eliminated the PSs with only 1 meter feeding 2 pressurezones, PS with GW extraction, and PS located at the end of the Distribution system. After that we wereleft with only Santa Ynez (~6,500 AFY) and Skyline (~1,000 AFY), and I chose the one with higher flow.

I didn't observe any anomaly with Santa Ynez data set other than no energy data for a month andenergy data being lumped for a couple months after that, which is not uncommon. For those months, Ijust assumed half of the energy is for 1 month, and the other half for the next month.

On the LADWP Network map, for each PS, show kWh and AF, then where it shows the flow path, showDelta EI, and for the pressure zone, show the cumulative EI, and so on.

On the cumulative EI map, for each pressure zone, not only show the cumulative EI, but also the Flow,and probably the resulting Energy use in each zone also.


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588735

Page 7581 of 8813



Thanks.




Please see below.




Thanks.



Page 7582 of 8813


Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

Page 7583 of 8813

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142






Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:07 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, Jin

Page 7584 of 8813


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.








Page 7585 of 8813




















* Task Complete



Page 7586 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7588 of 8813

of 8813









Thanks.




Please see below.

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 12:05:24 PDTAttachments: 111NHOPE-FLA-RMA18-A_20160826_120128.pdf image004.png

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588718

Page 7590 of 8813




Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Page 7591 of 8813

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

Page 7592 of 8813

132

1,142






Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks



Page 7593 of 8813


Thanks.



















Page 7594 of 8813









* Task Complete



Page 7595 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.588718-000001Owner: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>Filename: 111NHOPE-FLA-RMA18-A_20160826_120128.pdfLast Modified: Fri Aug 26 12:05:24 PDT 2016

Page 7596 of 8813

111NHOPE-FLA-RMA18-A_20160826_120128.pdf for Printed Item: 1215 ( Attachment 1 of 2)

Page 7597 of 8813

111NHOPE-FLA-RMA18-A_20160826_120128.pdf for Printed Item: 1215 ( Attachment 1 of 2)

Page 7598 of 8813


Page 7599 of 8813

of 8813



OK thanks.










Thanks.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:25 AM


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.588723

Page 7601 of 8813

To: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report



Please see below.




Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

Page 7602 of 8813

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Page 7603 of 8813

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142






Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,


Page 7604 of 8813


Thanks




Thanks.













Page 7605 of 8813















* Task Complete



Page 7606 of 8813


Page 7607 of 8813

of 8813

From: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:

Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

The reduced flow rate of plumbing fixture was adopted by City Council last Friday. So should I revisethe sample water conservation commitment letter, etc. to reflect the new ordinance?

04/22/2016

City Clerk transmitted file to Mayor. Last day for Mayor to act is May 2, 2016.

04/22/2016

Council adopted item forthwith.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, April 22, 2016 2:47 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Is there a way to find out the result of the item now? The meeting video and journal are not posted yet.

If the item was approved, I need to update handouts for the Crossroads Hollywood Project WaterConservation Meeting, which will be next Tuesday, 4/26/16. The current information on sample waterconservation letter, current codes/requirements, and rebate info sheet would need to be updated beforenext Tuesday’s meeting.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:42 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

FYI…

City Council Meeting – Friday, April 22 @ 10:00 AM

Date: Mon Apr 25 2016 10:33:05 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214246

Page 7609 of 8813

ITEM NO. (3) 15-0458<https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=15-0458> CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM CITYATTORNEY and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending provisions of Articles 4and 9 of Chapter IX of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish Citywide water efficiency standardsand require water-saving systems and technologies in buildings and landscapes to conserve andreduce water usage.

Potential outcome: FYI item – Amendment to provisions of Articles 4 and 9 of Chapter IX of the LAMCto establish Citywide water efficiency standards.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:47 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, Andrei; Kwan, DelonSubject: FW: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

There is an ordinance that has not been adopted that will make current water efficiency requirementmore stringent. Please see page 7 of the attached form. For example, currently showerheadrequirement is max of 2 gpm, and is proposed to be reduced to 1.8 gpm.

I’ll check often to see when it gets approved.

From: Kemper, James M.Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:22 PMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hi Jin,

As of 4-20-2016 CF15-0458 has not yet been adopted although they are calling the current languagethe “Final Draft”. Here is a link where you can print and review the document.

https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=15-0458

Page 7610 of 8813

Jim

From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:25 PMTo: Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hello Jim,

Do you know if the highlighted changes below has been adopted per Mayor’s Directive No. 5?

Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 8:39 AMTo: Kemper, James M.Cc: Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

OK. I’ll contact you in a couple of months to find out if the changes to the Code have been made.

Thank you!

Page 7611 of 8813

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845

From: Kemper, James M.Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 8:37 AMTo: Hwang, JinSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

I would guess within 1-2 months. The changes to the Code have been approved by Council but thewording has not been vetted through the City Attorney yet.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:45 PMTo: Kemper, James M.Cc: Tabakh, AmirSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hi Jim,

Thank you so much. We will distribute the revised plumbing fixture requirement info sheet to developerswe work with on Water Supply Assessments.

Do you have any idea approximately when further reductions will be adopted per Mayor’s Directive No.5?

Jin

From: Kemper, James M.

Page 7612 of 8813

Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:28 PMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Tabakh, Amir; Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hi Jin,

Please see attached. There was a mid cycle adoption of CalGreen and an Emergency Adoption,effective 7/1/15 and 10/23/15 respecively, both making changes to the 2013 CALGreen Code. Theattached updates these changes. Note that there is also Mayor’s Directive No. 5 which will adopt furtherreductions. It is still in process of adoption under CF# 15-0458.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:08 PMTo: Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

OK. Thank you.

From: Kemper, James M.Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:03 PMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Tabakh, Amir; Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

I’ll look into it. There have been a lot of changes lately to Title 20 and an emergency adoption under the2013 codes impacting fixture flow rates.


Hello Jim,

I have a note that the CEC’s new regulations on indoor plumbing fixture/appliances will go into effect onJan 1, 2016. (*there may be a 180 day delay for implementation like the codes.)

Can you please confirm that the 1.2 gpm residential lavatory faucet went into effect on 1/1/16? Should Imake this change to the Green Building Tips and Water Conservation info sheet (attached)? We arecurrently working on a WSA, and would like to distribute the most updated information to the developer.

Page 7613 of 8813

Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845

From: Osama Younan [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 8:49 PMTo: Kemper, James M.Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Bradley Neighbors ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Falcon, Penny; Kwan, Delon; Hwang, Jin;Tabakh, Amir; Gentili, MarkSubject: Re: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Jim,

Please call Dominic to address the new regulations.

Thanks!!

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Kemper, James M. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello Osama,

I have some questions regarding the attached link regarding the recent executive order by the Governorand the approval by the CEC regarding plumbing fixture water efficiency requirements. What is theeffective date of this ruling? For projects submitted or permitted prior to the effective date, canpreviously allowed fixtures be installed? When will LADBS be requiring these fixtures? Will they berequired in all types of installations (new, altered existing buildings)? Does this ruling constitute amandatory retrofit of existing fixtures? Does this have any impact on the definition of compliant fixturesunder SB407?

http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2015_releases/2015-04-08_water_appliance_standards_nr.html

Thanks,

James Kemper

Page 7614 of 8813

Energy Efficiency Engineering

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

111 Hope St. Rm. 1057 | Los Angeles CA 90012

Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>

Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


Page 7615 of 8813


Subject: Re: Weekly Work Activity Report

Thank you

You should talk further with earl next week on diagram for slide

Have good weekend

________________________________On: 26 August 2016 14:01, "Hwang, Jin" <[email protected]> wrote:2011: decreasing EI with higher Flow2012: increasing EI with higher Flow2011-12: Flat





OK. I’ll pick another year at Santa Ynez and plot the graph.




OK thanks.

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 14:55:08 PDTAttachments: image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.589202

Page 7616 of 8813





I didn’t observe any anomaly with Santa Ynez data set other than no energy data for a month andenergy data being lumped for a couple months after that, which is not uncommon. For those months, Ijust assumed half of the energy is for 1 month, and the other half for the next month.




Do you have a rough diagram markup that can illustrate what you’re thinking on the highlight below youcan show me?

Thanks.




Please see below.

Page 7617 of 8813


And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc.There are 7 pump stations each with only 1 meter for multiple pumps feeding different pressure zones.For each of 6 of these Pump Stations, we provided 1 set of energy data and 2 different sets of flowdata. I’m not sure how UC Davis apportion the energy to pumps feeding different pressure zones. ForLaurel Canyon (1096), we provided high energy and really low flow data. I think this energy data is forboth pumps, not just for Laurel Canyon feeding 1096 zone. For Laurel Canyon (1424), we provided lowenergy and high flow. This energy is probably not pumping energy. Instead of distributing the highenergy for both pumps, It seems like UC Davis used those provided data for each pump to arrive athigh EI for Laurel Canyon (1096) and low EI for Laurel Canyon (1424).

We should either install energy meters for each pump feeding different pressure zones at these pumpstations, or apportion energy proportionate to the flow, but I’m not sure how accurate the latter wouldbe.

Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Page 7618 of 8813

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

Page 7619 of 8813

132

1,142


In addition, was there a diagram in the report or past presentation that you found that can illustrate theconcern / deficiency we had with their modeling analyses on accounting for flow / conserved waterOn UC Davis’ LADWP network map, I think we should add Energy to each Pump Station and addassumed Flow in each pressure zone. Then transfer the assumed Flow and EI info to UC Davis’ mapshowing yellow to red pressure zones.


I’ll need to reschedule briefing with Dave/Penny, and need to have better idea when presentation will beready.


Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks


Can we go over some time this morning latest version of presentation to see updates from last week’sreview.

Page 7620 of 8813


Thanks.




· Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project: Water Conservation Meeting washeld.

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) – Jin

· Prepared a draft presentation on UC Davis’ EI study. -8/24/16


· Need to let Kendra know if Final Report is acceptable to close out the contract.

Crossroads Hollywood Project WSA – Jin (Target Board Date: 8/2/16)

· Need to revise breakdown between Ordinance savings accounted for and not accounted for in2015 UWMP and input in the WSA monitoring sheet. – 8/18/16

· Received stamped Reso and prepared a transmittal letter. – 8/18/16

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Campus Master Plan Project WSA – Jin

· Prepared preliminary schedule. -8/22/16.

· Applicant sent responses to most of the add'l questions before the Water Conservation meeting.-8/23/16.

· Water Conservation meeting was held. -8/23/16.

· Water Conservation meeting was held. -8/23/16

· Sent out follow-up scope questions. – 8/24/16

Boatyard Landscape Renovation WELWA – Jin

Page 7621 of 8813

· Informed the architect that the project site is not served by LADWP. Architect will pick up theplans and WELWA form (not picked up by 8/17/16). – 8/11/16

· Architect has not picked up the plants as of 8/24/16.

USR for Del Rey Point Project – Jin

· Deferred to Water Distribution and RW. – 8/15/16

· Prepared draft response to Jim Kemper. – 8/15/16

· Verified with Water GIS that project site is in LADWP service area. – 8/18/16

· Sent a reminder to RW to respond. -8/18/16

· RW responded, and Earl sent out response to Jim Kemper. -8/19/16

· Task Complete

550 Palos Verdes Project WSA – Jin

· Estimated project water demand and determined a WSA is not required. – 8/24/16

Page 7622 of 8813


Page 7623 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7625 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7627 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7629 of 8813

of 8813



2011: decreasing EI with higher Flow2012: increasing EI with higher Flow2011-12: Flat





OK. I'll pick another year at Santa Ynez and plot the graph.




OK thanks.



From: Hwang, Jin

Date: Fri Aug 26 2016 14:01:15 PDTAttachments: image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.589172

Page 7631 of 8813

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 12:05 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Work Activity Report







Thanks.




Please see below.


And also let me know why you think that pump station data is adequate, etc.There are 7 pump stations each with only 1 meter for multiple pumps feeding different pressure zones.For each of 6 of these Pump Stations, we provided 1 set of energy data and 2 different sets of flowdata. I'm not sure how UC Davis apportion the energy to pumps feeding different pressure zones. ForLaurel Canyon (1096), we provided high energy and really low flow data. I think this energy data is for

Page 7632 of 8813

both pumps, not just for Laurel Canyon feeding 1096 zone. For Laurel Canyon (1424), we provided lowenergy and high flow. This energy is probably not pumping energy. Instead of distributing the highenergy for both pumps, It seems like UC Davis used those provided data for each pump to arrive athigh EI for Laurel Canyon (1096) and low EI for Laurel Canyon (1424).


Thanks.




Flow

EI

Time

(AF/month)

(kWh/AF)

Apr-12

78

1,107

Feb-12

83

985

Mar-12

85

1,019

Dec-12

87

Page 7633 of 8813

1,105

Jan-12

88

1,032

May-12

101

1,015

Jun-12

112

1,015

Jul-12

121

1,140

Nov-12

127

1,194

Sep-12

128

1,034

Aug-12

131

973

Oct-12

132

1,142



Page 7634 of 8813

On UC Davis' LADWP network map, I think we should add Energy to each Pump Station and addassumed Flow in each pressure zone. Then transfer the assumed Flow and EI info to UC Davis' mapshowing yellow to red pressure zones.




Thanks.


8 am is OK.


To All,



Thanks




Thanks.

From: Hwang, JinSent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:18 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl

Page 7635 of 8813

Cc: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Work Activity Report






















Page 7636 of 8813





* Task Complete



Page 7637 of 8813


Page 7638 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7640 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7642 of 8813

of 8813


Page 7644 of 8813

of 8813



How can we confirm Mayor signed; we need to notify Applicant if this is the case, but want to confirmfirst.

Thanks

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9:52 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, Jin; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

I’m hearing from Penny that Mayor’s signed into effect, so new WUE requirements should be enforcedin new WSAs.

Penny is going to see if Jim Kemper can give us a briefing to make sure we all understand newrequirements

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:33 AMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Hwang, Jin; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

I would like to see any updated cc letter template before it’s handed out to planning / developer.

As for when to implement, should check with Amir’s group on effective date.

Date: Wed Apr 27 2016 09:54:14 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.372109

Page 7646 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Monday, April 25, 2016 10:54 AMTo: Hwang, Jin; Kwan, Delon; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Jin,

Correction, for the actual C.C. Letter, update new ordinance values, but do not put quote in parenthesisbelow.

I mistakenly thought you were referring to the table that the conservation specialist, Mr. Estrada, handsout.

We will need to make sure we update that table or ask Mr. Estrada if he has an updated version.

Thanks


Jin,

Please revise C.C. Letter, but put in parenthesis after affected items “Pending Mayoral approval by May2, 2016.”

Thanks

From: Hwang, JinSent: Monday, April 25, 2016 10:33 AMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, AndreiSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Page 7647 of 8813


04/22/2016


04/22/2016






FYI…



Page 7648 of 8813






Hi Jin,



Jim


Page 7649 of 8813

Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845



Thank you!

Jin Hwang





Page 7650 of 8813


213-367-4845




Hi Jim,



Jin

From: Kemper, James M.Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:28 PMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Tabakh, Amir; Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hi Jin,

Please see attached. There was a mid cycle adoption of CalGreen and an Emergency Adoption,

Page 7651 of 8813

effective 7/1/15 and 10/23/15 respecively, both making changes to the 2013 CALGreen Code. Theattached updates these changes. Note that there is also Mayor’s Directive No. 5 which will adopt furtherreductions. It is still in process of adoption under CF# 15-0458.


OK. Thank you.




Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang



Page 7652 of 8813




213-367-4845


Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>


Page 7653 of 8813


Page 7654 of 8813



I think it’s any day now, if not already. So for applicant, staff can send prior council file with proposedordinance amendments, if not already.

It basically affects our calc on ordinance savings vs. voluntary.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9:54 AMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates


Thanks





Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.372146

Page 7655 of 8813





Jin,




Thanks


Jin,

Page 7656 of 8813


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016






Page 7657 of 8813

FYI…








Page 7658 of 8813

Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Page 7659 of 8813


Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845




Hi Jim,


Do you have any idea approximately when further reductions will be adopted per Mayor’s Directive No.

Page 7660 of 8813

5?

Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.




Page 7661 of 8813

Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,

I have some questions regarding the attached link regarding the recent executive order by the Governorand the approval by the CEC regarding plumbing fixture water efficiency requirements. What is theeffective date of this ruling? For projects submitted or permitted prior to the effective date, canpreviously allowed fixtures be installed? When will LADBS be requiring these fixtures? Will they be

Page 7662 of 8813

required in all types of installations (new, altered existing buildings)? Does this ruling constitute amandatory retrofit of existing fixtures? Does this have any impact on the definition of compliant fixturesunder SB407?


Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7663 of 8813



We gave draft ordinance at C.C. Meeting and gave fair warning of pending approval by Mayor.

From: Kwan, DelonSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:15 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

I think it’s any day now, if not already. So for applicant, staff can send prior council file with proposedordinance amendments, if not already.

It basically affects our calc on ordinance savings vs. voluntary.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9:54 AMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates


Thanks



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.372157

Page 7664 of 8813







Jin,




Page 7665 of 8813

Thanks


Jin,


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016



Page 7666 of 8813




FYI…






Page 7667 of 8813



Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang




Page 7668 of 8813



213-367-4845



Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845



From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:45 PMTo: Kemper, James M.

Page 7669 of 8813

Cc: Tabakh, AmirSubject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Hi Jim,



Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.


Page 7670 of 8813



Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Jim,

Page 7671 of 8813


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7672 of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>; Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:





Jin,




Thanks


Jin,

Date: Tue Apr 26 2016 09:33:22 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214422

Page 7673 of 8813


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016






Page 7674 of 8813

FYI…








Hi Jin,

Page 7675 of 8813



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Page 7676 of 8813


Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845




Hi Jim,



Page 7677 of 8813

Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.




Hello Jim,

Page 7678 of 8813



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,

I have some questions regarding the attached link regarding the recent executive order by the Governorand the approval by the CEC regarding plumbing fixture water efficiency requirements. What is theeffective date of this ruling? For projects submitted or permitted prior to the effective date, canpreviously allowed fixtures be installed? When will LADBS be requiring these fixtures? Will they berequired in all types of installations (new, altered existing buildings)? Does this ruling constitute a

Page 7679 of 8813

mandatory retrofit of existing fixtures? Does this have any impact on the definition of compliant fixturesunder SB407?


Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7680 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:


Delon,

We decided to give applicant current letters, green tips and conservation table as well as draftordinance (available publically) and let them know about likely approval by Mayor on May 2, 2016.

The only updates to C.C. Letter are a couple that are not related to draft ordinance.

Thanks





Jin,


Date: Tue Apr 26 2016 09:53:02 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214423

Page 7681 of 8813



Thanks


Jin,


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016


Page 7682 of 8813





FYI…




From: Hwang, JinSent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:47 PMTo: Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, Andrei; Kwan, Delon

Page 7683 of 8813

Subject: FW: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates




Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Page 7684 of 8813

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845



Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


I would guess within 1-2 months. The changes to the Code have been approved by Council but the

Page 7685 of 8813

wording has not been vetted through the City Attorney yet.


Hi Jim,



Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.

Page 7686 of 8813




Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845

From: Osama Younan [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 8:49 PMTo: Kemper, James M.Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Bradley Neighbors ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Falcon, Penny; Kwan, Delon; Hwang, Jin;

Page 7687 of 8813

Tabakh, Amir; Gentili, MarkSubject: Re: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates

Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7688 of 8813

From: Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>To: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>; Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:








Jin,




Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214915

Page 7689 of 8813


Thanks


Jin,


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016


From: Hwang, JinSent: Friday, April 22, 2016 2:47 PMTo: Kwan, Delon; Moosbrugger, Earl; Tcharssov, Andrei

Page 7690 of 8813





FYI…





Page 7691 of 8813




Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang


Page 7692 of 8813





213-367-4845



Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845



Page 7693 of 8813


Hi Jim,



Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.

From: Kemper, James M.

Page 7694 of 8813

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:03 PMTo: Hwang, JinCc: Tabakh, Amir; Kemper, James M.Subject: RE: Recent CEC ruling on plumbing fixture flow rates



Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Page 7695 of 8813

Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7696 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:


Jin,


Thanks



04/22/2016


04/22/2016




If the item was approved, I need to update handouts for the Crossroads Hollywood Project WaterConservation Meeting, which will be next Tuesday, 4/26/16. The current information on sample water


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214250

Page 7697 of 8813

conservation letter, current codes/requirements, and rebate info sheet would need to be updated beforenext Tuesday’s meeting.


FYI…







Page 7698 of 8813


Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,


Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845

Page 7699 of 8813



Thank you!

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845




Hi Jim,

Page 7700 of 8813



Jin


Hi Jin,



OK. Thank you.



Page 7701 of 8813


Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845


Jim,


Thanks!!

Page 7702 of 8813


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>



Page 7703 of 8813

From: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>To: Hwang, Jin <[email protected]>; Kwan, Delon <[email protected]>; Tcharssov, Andrei <[email protected]>Cc:


Jin,




Thanks


Jin,


Thanks




Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.214256

Page 7704 of 8813

04/22/2016


04/22/2016






FYI…



Potential outcome: FYI item – Amendment to provisions of Articles 4 and 9 of Chapter IX of the LAMC

Page 7705 of 8813

to establish Citywide water efficiency standards.





Hi Jin,



Jim


Hello Jim,

Page 7706 of 8813


Thank you.

Jin Hwang






213-367-4845



Thank you!

Jin Hwang






Page 7707 of 8813

213-367-4845




Hi Jim,



Jin


Hi Jin,

Please see attached. There was a mid cycle adoption of CalGreen and an Emergency Adoption,effective 7/1/15 and 10/23/15 respecively, both making changes to the 2013 CALGreen Code. Theattached updates these changes. Note that there is also Mayor’s Directive No. 5 which will adopt further

Page 7708 of 8813

reductions. It is still in process of adoption under CF# 15-0458.


OK. Thank you.




Hello Jim,



Thank you.

Jin Hwang




Page 7709 of 8813



213-367-4845


Jim,


Thanks!!


Hello Osama,



Thanks,

James Kemper




Phone: 213-367-5095<tel:213-367-5095>


Page 7710 of 8813


Page 7711 of 8813


Subject: RE: Weekly Update 151030

Delon,

Here is our weekly update. Items in red font are past items. Updates are in black font. Some projectwith no updates are not included but are kept in a separate file for tracking.

Thanks

Agreement 47288-5 - Strategic Planning Services - Flow Science - Andrei

* Received a draft TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science. Reviewed the draft and prepared for theconference call on Thursday, March 26, 2015 - 3/24/15.

* Received and reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science following the conferencecall - 4/1/15


* Waiting on updated Task Proposal from Vendor - 5/14/15

* Sent Agreement to Greg Reed - 10/21/15

* Task Order Proposal #2

o Incorporated input from Greg Reed & obtained attachments - Week ending 10/30/15

o Made other edits (Delon with have signature Authority) - 10/29/15

o Sent to Clerical for processing - 10/30/15

Climate Change Work Plan - Earl

* Need to begin plan - 10/30/15 - Earl * No new updates

CPRA Request for NBC Universal - Jin

* Gathered documents and requested Print Shop to print out documents to comply with CPRArequest by 7/7/15. * Print Shop printed out documents, and staff extracted e-mails from city attorneys. * Was unable to open 3 e-mail files. IT is working on accessing the e-mail files. * Asked John Rudek for another extension on deadline. * Due date pending * John Rudek may have a few questions on the documents submitted - 9/4/15

Date: Thu Nov 05 2015 16:44:14 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.64716

Page 7712 of 8813

* Answered John Rudek's question. - 10/14/15 * TASK COMPLETE

Executive Directive 5 - Progress Tracking

* Request received by Delon to track how we are progressing toward ED5 goals annually - 11/3/15 * Due approximately 12/3/15 * Need to discuss with Delon - 11/5/15 - Earl

LAASM and LAA Run-off Model Operation by Water Resources Development - Andrei (New Item - Notincluded in 9/17/15 weekly update). Added on 9/18/15

* Original request date unknown. Reminder by Delon on 7/30/15 * Assigned to Staff - 7/30/15 * Andrei, Earl and Paul Scantlin met to define task, identify possibilities and limitations, and discusstraining - 8/20/15 * Created "Issues and Questions" summary sheet summarizing meeting - Earl * Briefly met with Delon but need to discuss further * Instructed staff to create agenda and set up meeting to include Delon in next couple weeks -10/8/15 * No new updates

Neenach Turnout & DWR/AVEK/MWD Agreements - Andrei

* Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15

* Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completionbased on WETS reporting - 5/7/15

* Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. Theactivities are currently scheduled for February 2015.

* Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15.

* Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15

* Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15

* Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15

* Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl

* Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15

* No new updates

NOP Review for Crossroads Hollywood - Andrei

* Date received - 10/22/15

* Comments due - 11/12/15

* Assigned to staff - 10/22/15

* Reviewed/researched to determine what type of response needed - 10/29/15 - Andrei

Page 7713 of 8813

* Discuss potential response with Earl but need to contact City Planning to clarify what is needed.10/30/15 - Andrei

* Clarified with Andrei what was needed in review - week ending 11/5/15 - Earl

* Submitted first draft comments to Earl. Earl reviewed and sent back for incompleteness.Submitted second draft - 11/2/15

* Need to review second draft comments - 11/5/15 - Earl

Palmdale Water District GW Banking - Andrei

* Attended PWD Presentation in GW Banking in Palmdale - 2/25/15 - Andrei and Earl

* Attended follow-up meeting with Greg Reed - 2/26/15 - Andrei and Earl

* Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP - 3/5/15. - Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data - 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task - 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station - 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 -7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis - 10/20/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis. Completed costs and benefits for 7 differentscenarios - 10/29/15. * Completed calculations for the analysis. A meeting to discuss the analysis is scheduled for 11/13/15(11/3/15 meeting was re-scheduled) - 11/3/15.

Response to Maria Brusher (Part Two) - Earl (Do not report unless progress)

* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15 * Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway * Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15 * Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 11/5/15 - Earl * Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15

Tetratech - Confidence Level Summary for Climate Change Conclusions - Andrei

* Purpose: To be able to describe, for a public audience, the confidence level(s) for conclusions onClimate Change from 2011 Tetratech Study * Assigned to Staff 10/5/15 * Discussed several times with staff - Week of 10/5/15 * Submitted First Draft (incomplete - need more time) - 10/8/15 - Andrei

* Submitted updated draft "Treatment of Uncertainties" - 10/9/15 - Andrei * Need to review - 11/5/15 - Earl

Page 7714 of 8813

UC Davis Proposal (Energy Intensity Study):

* Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * Requested progress update to Val A., contract administrator - 11/5/15 - Earl

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Reportreview - Earl * Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - Jin * Reviewed entire Chapter carefully for any remaining updates, ensured latest data updates wereused, updated tables, etc. with latest data, submitted to Delon for review. Version submitted acceptedon previous changes, to-date, so only changes from this review were shown in track changes mode -11/3/15 - Earl

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)Hydro Generation [LAA & In-City (Franklin, Sawtelle & Headworks)] - Jin

* Compiled gross and net energy generation at Franklin and Sawtelle plants (hydroelectric plantswithin City limit), and found some discrepancies between 2 files received from the Power System.Power System contact mentioned 1 file is from the invoice, as opposed to the actual plant data. Needto find out more about getting plant data. - 4/28/15 - Jin

* Determined that N. Hollywood P.S. has hydrogenation, but they are not operational due tomaintenance burden - 3/30/15 - Earl

* Requested LAA & In-City energy generation plant data (as opposed to invoice data) from thePower System from 2008 to present in kWh at each hydroelectric plants. Data are expected to beavailable by 5/26/16. - 5/4/15 - Jin

* Received data but it was for 2011-2014. Need to review and request previous years - 5/28/15

* After data received, need to inform Power System, again, that data will be used in publicdocument calculations

* Received instruction from Paul to obtain LAA Hydro Plant Q data from "Whiskey" website andOwens George Reports. Also, obtained all meter numbers necessary to collect data and begancollecting data. Earl called Chief operator at Control Gorge (Mike Clarke) to discuss specifics of datasince we are not sure if data from Whiskey is through plant or include diverted water, and also to obtainmonthly version of OG report data (which shows flows specifically through plants) instead of daily toavoid having to compile data from 360 sheets onto one - 7/9/15 - Jin

* Need to get flow and energy info for Headworks hydrogenation - Jin

* Still waiting on LAA Energy data for 2015 from Power System - 8/7/15 - Jin

Page 7715 of 8813

* Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - JinW/E Nexus Report & Procedures Updates

* Assigned to Val - 5/18/15

* W/E Nexus Report (more general)

o Val's first draft identification of updates - 10/8/15 - Earl

o Need to review - 10/30/15

* W/E Nexus Procedure (detailed documentation for internal use)

o Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15

o Reviewed 50% of document and discussed with Val & Delon - 10/29/15 - Earl

o Plan to review 100% on 10/30/15 - Earl

o Worked on the Water Energy nexus report/manual. RW and treatment sections. Completed part 2 -carbon emissions. Need to continue. - 10/29/15 - Val

* I asked Jin to review W/E Nexus Procedures, check footnotes, locate source data, developquestions, and learn and understand procedures, sources, and methodologies so that she will be ableto update in the future. Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl * Held meetings with staff, individually and with both staff, to go over procedures. * Reviewed various versions of draft - Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl * Organized GW section, incorporated LA-17 analysis and Neenach PS analysis to the WE reportmanual - 151105 - Val * Reviewing and commenting on Val's WEN procedure document. - 11/5/15 - Jin * Sent current draft to Delon for review - 11/5/15 - Val

WSA for NoHo West Project - Andrei

* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15 * Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15 * Reviewed Transmittal Letter, edited, sent to Delon, received approval, sent to Clerical forprocessing - 11/30/15 - Earl

Miscellaneous

* Val's Transition to New Group - Earl * Val last effective work day with WRD - 10/12/15 * Luncheon scheduled for same day * Attended ConAdmin class on Wednesday, 11/4/15, 12pm - 3pm - Andrei * Andrei will be on vacation: 11/10/15 * Answer questions related to ED5 response for Water Cabinet Meeting - 10/30/15 - Earl * Planned for Val's luncheon, card signing, and gift - week ending 11/5/15 - Earl * Send e-mail request to Carolyn Casavan (consultant) and Maria Sison-Roces enquiring aboutextent of tracking of energy efficiency efforts and projects directly related to Water System

Page 7716 of 8813



I knew that; I had just asked him to take a look prior to plan development since he was more expert.I will revise weekly update to reflect more accurately.ThanksFrom: Kwan, DelonSent: Friday, October 30, 2015 11:20 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151030

For climate change work plan, it's for you to develop and work with staff for buy in, same goes for w/ework plan.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:46 AMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151030

Delon,


Thanks


* Received a draft TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science. Reviewed the draft and prepared for theconference call on Thursday, March 26, 2015 - 3/24/15. * Received and reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science following the conferencecall - 4/1/15 * Reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science - 5/4/15. * Waiting on updated Task Proposal from Vendor - 5/14/15 * Sent Agreement to Greg Reed - 10/21/15 * Task Order Proposal #2 * Incorporated input from Greg Reed & obtained attachments - Week ending 10/30/15 * Made other edits (Delon with have signature Authority) - 10/29/15 * Plan to send to Clerical for processing 10/30/15

Climate Change Work Plan - Andrei

* Assigned to staff to propose update to previous draft - 9/8/15 - Earl * No new updates

Date: Fri Oct 30 2015 11:26:43 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.50244

Page 7827 of 8813


* Gathered documents and requested Print Shop to print out documents to comply with CPRArequest by 7/7/15. * Print Shop printed out documents, and staff extracted e-mails from city attorneys. * Was unable to open 3 e-mail files. IT is working on accessing the e-mail files. * Asked John Rudek for another extension on deadline. * Due date pending * John Rudek may have a few questions on the documents submitted - 9/4/15 * No new updates

DEIR Review for Paramount - Andrei

* Requested on 9/11/15 * Assigned to staff on 9/11/15 * Comments due 10/26/15 * First draft to Earl for review 9/16/15 * Reviewed first draft 10/21/15 - Earl * Deferred to Distribution (only two paragraphs need review) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Submitted first draft to Delon for review (one comment only) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Received comments from Delon. Made changes and re-submitted - 10/22/15 - Earl * Comments sent to Planning - 10/22/15 * TASK COMPLETE

DEIR Review for The Reef (formerly SOLA Village) Project - Val

* Request received 10/6/15 * Assigned to staff 10/7/15 * Comments due to Planning on 11/2/15 * Submitted comments for review to Earl on 10/21/15 * Reviewed, added comments, and submitted to Delon - 10/27/15 - Earl * Responded to Delon's comments and sent final to Environmental - 10/27/15 * TASK COMPLETE



MWELO Updates - Jin - Don't show unless progress made

* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl

Page 7828 of 8813

* Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. Need to discuss further toclarify - 10/29/15 - Earl


* Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15 * Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completion basedon WETS reporting - 5/7/15 * Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. The activitiesare currently scheduled for February 2015. * Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15. * Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15 * Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15 * Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15 * Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl * Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15


* Date received - 10/22/15 * Comments due - 11/12/15 * Assigned to staff - 10/22/15 * Reviewed/researched to determine what type of response needed - 10/29/15 - Andrei * Discuss potential response with Earl but need to contact City Planning to clarify what is needed.10/30/15 - Andrei


* Attended PWD Presentation in GW Banking in Palmdale - 2/25/15 - Andrei and Earl * Attended follow-up meeting with Greg Reed - 2/26/15 - Andrei and Earl * Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP - 3/5/15. - Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data - 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task - 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station - 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 -7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis - 10/20/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis. Completed costs and benefits for 7 differentscenarios - 10/29/15.

Response to DWP Commissioner on L.A. Times Article Exxon Article on Climate Change - Andrei

* Received request on 10/9/15 * Read article and discussed with Andrei - 10/16/15 * First draft response to Earl - 10/16/15 * Provided a draft response & follow-ups to Delon and Earl - 10/20/15


* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15 * Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -

Page 7829 of 8813

Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway * Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15 * Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 10/30/15 - Earl * Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.

Page 7830 of 8813

09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Reportreview - Earl

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)W/E Nexus Report & Procedures Updates










oW/E Nexus Work Plan Update

* Need to make plan and assign - Earl

* Instruct staff (Val) and provide guidelines to include re-organization of Galaxy folders, files,labeling, documentation into a user-friendly format - week of 9/7/15 - EarlTracking Template - Val

* Worked on the tracking spreadsheet met with Earl and went over the spreadsheet. Need tocontinue. - 6/10/15

Page 7831 of 8813

o Provided input on features for spreadsheet - Earl

* Recalculated Treatment values for MWD sources. Incorporated new CA state CO2 factors to themain EI spreadsheet. - 10/29/15 - Val


* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15 * Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15 * Need to Review - 10/30/15 - Earl

Miscellaneous

* Val's Transition to New Group - Earl * Val last effective work day with WRD - 10/12/15 * Notified Val on 10/26/15 that his probation begins the following day. * Attended ConAdmin class (PSP 101) on Friday, 10/23/15, 8am-12pm - Andrei * Attended ConAdmin class (PSP 101),on Monday,10/26/15, 8am-12pm - Earl & Val * Jin on Vacation: 10/19/15 - 10/27/15, inclusive. * Andrei on vacation: 10/27/15 & 10/28/15 * Provide miscellaneous responses for Water Cabinet Meeting on ED5 - Earl and staff * Provided limited input for talking points on CEC responses to Jacot for Delon - Earl and Jin * Spent time preparing to provide input for talking points for Marty's presentation AEE presentation.Not used. - 10/29/15 - Earl * Prepared a summary of Tetra Tech findings concerning operational and infrastructure adaptationmeasures for projected low/high flow conditions in LAA watershed - 10/23/15 - Andrei

Page 7832 of 8813



What additional updates to MWELO have been made? I thought the adjustments were made recentlyback in June 2015.Also, when do you think you can give me an update as to which items still need to be completed in thedraft chapters of the UWMP?


Delon,


Thanks






* Gathered documents and requested Print Shop to print out documents to comply with CPRArequest by 7/7/15. * Print Shop printed out documents, and staff extracted e-mails from city attorneys. * Was unable to open 3 e-mail files. IT is working on accessing the e-mail files. * Asked John Rudek for another extension on deadline.

Date: Mon Nov 02 2015 06:50:11 PSTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.51176

Page 7833 of 8813

* Due date pending * John Rudek may have a few questions on the documents submitted - 9/4/15 * No new updates








* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. Need to discuss further toclarify - 10/29/15 - Earl


* Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15 * Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completion basedon WETS reporting - 5/7/15

Page 7834 of 8813

* Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. The activitiesare currently scheduled for February 2015. * Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15. * Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15 * Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15 * Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15 * Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl * Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15









Page 7835 of 8813





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

UWMP 2015 Update

Page 7836 of 8813



















* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15

Page 7837 of 8813

* Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15 * Need to Review - 10/30/15 - Earl

Miscellaneous


Page 7838 of 8813



Attached is a detailed account of the changes. Factors for non-residential changed and a couple otheritems.I will try to get the list for remaining items for UWMP by the end of today.ThanksFrom: Kwan, DelonSent: Monday, November 02, 2015 6:50 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151030

What additional updates to MWELO have been made? I thought the adjustments were made recentlyback in June 2015.Also, when do you think you can give me an update as to which items still need to be completed in thedraft chapters of the UWMP?


Delon,


Thanks




* Assigned to staff to propose update to previous draft - 9/8/15 - Earl

Date: Mon Nov 02 2015 07:10:10 PSTAttachments: RE: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs (1).msg

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.51199

Page 7839 of 8813

* No new updates


* Gathered documents and requested Print Shop to print out documents to comply with CPRArequest by 7/7/15. * Print Shop printed out documents, and staff extracted e-mails from city attorneys. * Was unable to open 3 e-mail files. IT is working on accessing the e-mail files. * Asked John Rudek for another extension on deadline. * Due date pending * John Rudek may have a few questions on the documents submitted - 9/4/15 * No new updates








* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -

Page 7840 of 8813

10/16/15 - Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. Need to discuss further toclarify - 10/29/15 - Earl


* Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15 * Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completion basedon WETS reporting - 5/7/15 * Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. The activitiesare currently scheduled for February 2015. * Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15. * Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15 * Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15 * Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15 * Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl * Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15








* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15

Page 7841 of 8813

* Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway * Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15 * Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 10/30/15 - Earl * Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl

Page 7842 of 8813

* Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

UWMP 2015 Update
















Page 7843 of 8813




* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15 * Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15 * Need to Review - 10/30/15 - Earl

Miscellaneous


Page 7844 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.51199-000001Owner: Moosbrugger, Earl <[email protected]>Filename: RE: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs (1).msg <extracted>Last Modified: Mon Nov 02 07:10:10 PST 2015

Page 7845 of 8813

To: Moosbrugger, Earl[[email protected]]From: Hwang, JinSent: Wed 10/14/2015 3:59:21 PMImportance: NormalSubject: RE: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs

Earl,

Here is the summary of reviewing the updated MWELO.

Previously when I reviewed the emergency standard adoptions, ETAF (ET Adjustment Factor) for residential and non-residential was both 0.55, and ETAF for public school was 0.65.

The final code shows ETAF for residential is 0.55, ETAF for non-residential (including commercial, institutional, industrial, and public) is 0.45.

The equation for MAWA is ET0 (0.62)[(ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA))]

SLA (Special Landscaped Area) includes recreational area.

IE (Irrigation Efficiency) is now 0.75 for overhead spray devices, and 0.81 for drip.

PF (Plant Factor) definition is revised by including Very Low plant factor (0 to 0.1), and revising Low PF to 0.1 to 0.3.

The final code can be found here.

https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Browse/Home/California/CaliforniaCodeofRegulations?guid=I55B69DB0D45A11DEA95CA4428EC25FA0&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)

Water budget calculators for residential and non-residential are located here.

http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/

From: Hwang, JinSent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:16 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs

Please see revised below. I'm not sure why it is specified "potable" water for residential and public school, but not for non-residential and health facilities.

RE: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs (1).msg <extracted> for Printed Item: 1252 ( Attachment 1 of 1)

Page 7846 of 8813

Z:\Water Resources Development\Projects & Tasks\Water Supply Assessments\Water Conservation\Ordinance and Codes\2013 CAL Green Code\2015 06 01 Emergency Regulations<file:///\\Galaxy\Water%20Resources\Water%20Resources%20Development\Projects%20&%20Tasks\Water%20Supply%20Assessments\Water%20Conservation\Ordinance%20and%20Codes\2013%20CAL%20Green%20Code\2015%2006%2001%20Emergency%20Regulations>

Emergency Regulations for Residential, Non-Residential, Health Facilities, and Public School/Community Colleges constructions

· In response to Governor Brown's Executive Order B-29-15 (April1, 2015), California Building Standards Commission approved emergency regulations in the 2013 CA Green Building Standards Code.

· Applies to buildings for which building permits have been submitted on or after June 1, 2015, until future revision of MWELO by DWR

· ETAF has been reduced from previously set 0.7 to a lower factor. ETAF is Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor that, when applied to reference evapotranspiration (ETo), adjusts for plant factors and irrigation efficiency, two major influences upon the amount of water that needs to be applied to the landscape.

· Additional Water Allowance for SLA (Special Landscape Areas) has been increased from previously set 0.3 to a higher factor. SLA is landscape area decided solely to edible plants, areas irrigated with RW, water features using RW and areas dedicated to active play such as parks and sports fields.

· Original: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.7 x LA) + 0.3 x SLA)] Note: LA = total landscape area, including SLA

· Alternate methods to reduce outdoor potable water use in landscape area are captured rainwater, recycled water, graywater, and reclaimed water.

Ø Use of potable water shall be authorized where necessary to address an immediate health and safety need or to comply with a term or condition in a permit issued by a state or federal agency

Residential constructions

· For potable water use

· Revised ETAF = 0.55

· Revised Add'l Water Allowance for SLA = 0.45

· Revised: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.55 x LA) + 0.45 x SLA)]

· 0.7 to 0.55 is approximately 21% reduction in MAWA.

Non-Residential and Health Facilities constructions


Page 7847 of 8813

· For landscape areas greater or equal to 2,500 sf

Ø Revised ETAF = 0.55

Ø Revised Add'l Water Allowance for SLA = 0.45

Ø Revised: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.55 x LA) + 0.45 x SLA)]

Ø 0.7 to 0.55 is approximately 21% reduction in MAWA.

· For new construction or building addition/alteration, cumulative landscape area at least 1,000 sf but not more than 2,500 sf

Ø Install weather or soil moisture-based controllers

· For new construction or building addition/alteration, landscape area at least 1,000 sf but not more than 5,000 sf

Ø Install separate submeters

· For new water service, landscape area at least 500 sf but not more than 1,000 sf (Voluntary: not mandatory unless adopted by City)

Ø Install separate meters or submeters (for potable or non-potable)

Public School/Community Colleges constructions

· Applies to newly constructed buildings and facilities on new or existing sites

· For landscape areas greater or equal to 2,500 sf using potable water

Ø Revised ETAF = 0.65

Ø Revised Add'l Water Allowance for SLA = 0.35

Ø Revised: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.65 x LA) + 0.35 x SLA)]

Ø 0.7 to 0.65 is approximately 7% reduction in MAWA.

· For new construction or building addition/alteration, cumulative landscape area at least 1,000 sf but not more than 2,500 sf

Ø Install weather or soil moisture-based controllers

· For new construction or building addition/alteration, landscape area at least 1,000 sf but not more than 5,000 sf

Ø Install separate submeters

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 7:50 AM


Page 7848 of 8813

To: Hwang, Jin; Nikolajevs, Val; Tcharssov, AndreiCc: Kwan, DelonSubject: REVISED LANDSCAPE METHODOLOGY FOR WSAs

To All,

Due to emergency revision to CalGreen Standards approved last Friday, going forward, please use new MAWA methodology for current and future WSAs, including Cumulus.

If you need to discuss, please let me know.

Here is a summary of facts about provision (Thanks for handling Jin!):

Emergency Regulations for New Residential constructions (also applies to non-res, etc. - see below bullets)

· In response to Governor Brown's Executive Order B-29-15 (April1, 2015), California Building Standards Commission approved emergency regulations in the 2013 CA Green Building Standards Code.

· Applies to all landscaped areas for residential buildings for which building permits have been submitted on or after June 1, 2015, until future revision of MWELO by DWR.

· ETAF has been reduced from previously set 0.7 to 0.55. ETAF is Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor that, when applied to reference evapotranspiration (ETo), adjusts for plant factors and irrigation efficiency, two major influences upon the amount of water that needs to be applied to the landscape.

· Additional Water Allowance for SLA (Special Landscape Areas) has been increased from previously set 0.3 to 0.45. SLA is landscape area decided solely to edible plants, areas irrigated with RW, water features using RW and areas dedicated to active play such as parks and sports fields.

· Original: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.7 x LA) + 0.3 x SLA)] Note: LA = total landscape area, including SLA

· Revised: MAWA = ET0 (0.62)[(0.55 x LA) + 0.45 x SLA)]

New regulations, above, also apply to the following:


Page 7849 of 8813

"Res, non-res, state buildings and hospital emergency CALGreen CALGreen code changes were adopted last Friday for the areas under the jurisdiction of BSC, HCD, the State Architect and OSHPD."

Thanks!


Page 7850 of 8813



For climate change work plan, it's for you to develop and work with staff for buy in, same goes for w/ework plan.


Delon,


Thanks






* Gathered documents and requested Print Shop to print out documents to comply with CPRArequest by 7/7/15. * Print Shop printed out documents, and staff extracted e-mails from city attorneys. * Was unable to open 3 e-mail files. IT is working on accessing the e-mail files. * Asked John Rudek for another extension on deadline.

Date: Fri Oct 30 2015 11:19:33 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.50234

Page 7851 of 8813

* Due date pending * John Rudek may have a few questions on the documents submitted - 9/4/15 * No new updates








* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. Need to discuss further toclarify - 10/29/15 - Earl


* Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15 * Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completion basedon WETS reporting - 5/7/15

Page 7852 of 8813

* Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. The activitiesare currently scheduled for February 2015. * Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15. * Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15 * Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15 * Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15 * Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl * Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15









Page 7853 of 8813





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

UWMP 2015 Update

Page 7854 of 8813



















* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15

Page 7855 of 8813

* Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Sent in draft transmittal to Earl for review - 10/23/15 * Need to Review - 10/30/15 - Earl

Miscellaneous


Page 7856 of 8813



A couple of items if you can give me latest status:

· Move forward with issuing task order for proposal for Greg's GW strategic plan

· Status of UC Davis prelimin results?

· Remaining updates still needed for your UWMP draft chapters

· Send me latest link to updated draft internal w/e nexus reportThanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:20 PMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151022

Delon,


Thanks

Agreement 47288-5 - Strategic Planning Services - Andrei

· Received a draft TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science. Reviewed the draft and prepared for theconference call on Thursday, March 26, 2015 - 3/24/15.

· Received and reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science following the conferencecall - 4/1/15

· Reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science - 5/4/15.

· Waiting on updated Task Proposal from Vendor - 5/14/15

· Sent Agreement to Greg Reed - 10/21/15


* Requested on 9/11/15 * Assigned to staff on 9/11/15 * Comments due 10/26/15 * First draft to Earl for review 9/16/15

Date: Tue Oct 27 2015 06:31:18 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.41626

Page 7857 of 8813

* Reviewed first draft 10/21/15 - Earl * Deferred to Distribution (only two paragraphs need review) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Submitted first draft to Delon for review (one comment only) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Received comments from Delon. Made changes and re-submitted - 10/22/15 - Earl * Waiting for Delon's approval for comments - 10/22/15 - DUE MONDAY 10/26/15 to PLANNING


* Request received 10/6/15 * Assigned to staff 10/7/15 * Comments due to Planning on 11/2/15

· Submitted comments for review to Earl on 10/21/15

· Reviewed and added approximately 20 comments to approximately 4-5 that were submitted. 90%complete with review and comments before submission to Delon - 10/22/15 - Earl




· Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) - Earl - 5/6/15

· Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completionbased on WETS reporting - 5/7/15

· Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. Theactivities are currently scheduled for February 2015.

· Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach - 5/14/15.

· Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB - 7/30/15

· Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study - 8/5/15

· Earl requested to have update on construction completion date - 10/8/15

· Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl

NOC Review for Crossroads Hollywood - Andrei

· Date received - 10/22/15

· Comments due - 11/12/15

Page 7858 of 8813

· Assigned to staff - 10/22/15



· Attended follow-up meeting with Greg Reed - 2/26/15 - Andrei and Earl

* Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP - 3/5/15. - Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data - 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task - 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station - 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 -7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis - 10/20/15.


* Received request on 10/9/15 * Read article and discussed with Andrei - 10/16/15 * First draft response to Earl - 10/16/15 * Provided a draft response & follow-ups to Delon and Earl - 10/20/15.

Talking Points for Milken Institute Climate Change Forum Oct. 20, 2015

* Request Received on 10/16/15 - Due same day. * Draft talking points submitted to Delon - 10/16/15 * TASK COMPLETE





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project on

Page 7859 of 8813

time - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

USR for Cahuenga Hotel - Andrei

* Received request 10/13/15 * Due 10/16/15 * Deferred to Distribution 10/16/15 * Comments Environmental 10/16/105 * TASK COMPLETE

UWMP 2015 Update

* Reviewed DWR Draft Guidelines and provided comments - 8/8/24/15 - Earl * Chapter 4 - Recycled Water * Review for other group and provide comments - Jin * Perform cursory review of Ch.4 - Earl * Chapter 8 - MWD Supplies * Submitted final draft to Earl - 8/26/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15

* Chapter 11 - WSA Section Only - Jin * Completed Chapter 11.4 WSA draft to Earl - 8/20/15 * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15

Page 7860 of 8813

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Need to check what is still needed for final draft

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)W/E Nexus Report Update

· Assigned to Val - 5/18/15

· Reviewed 2010 Water Energy Nexus report to identify updates - Val

· Need to ensure that methodologies for EI values for DS, WWT, CEC reporting, etc. are clearlyand completely included in update.

· Worked on the Water Energy nexus report. Submitted draft with comments to Earl. Need to meetwith Earl and identify the next steps - 9/30/15

· Cursory review of original report - 9/30/15 - Earl

· Worked on SWP Section verifying sources and documenting methodology - 10/8/15 - Val

· Need to review:


o Val's documentation of SWP methodology, sources, etc (on separate document) - 10/8/15

§ Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15

o Began work schedule to complete W/E Nexus before 11/12/15

· Worked on GW, Distribution and CRA sections. Need to continue.

o Submitted partial draft of EI methodology Paper (not W/E Nexus Report) for review - 10/15/15

· Worked on the Water Energy nexus report/manual. RW and treatment sections. Need to continueW/E Nexus Work Plan Update

· Need to make plan and assign - Earl

· Instruct staff (Val) and provide guidelines to include re-organization of Galaxy folders, files,labeling, documentation into a user-friendly format - week of 9/7/15 - EarlTracking Template - Val

· Worked on the tracking spreadsheet met with Earl and went over the spreadsheet. Need tocontinue. - 6/10/15

Page 7861 of 8813

o Provided input on features for spreadsheet - EarlGeneral/Other

· Sent request to Mariko for WS facilities kWh data 06/11/2015 - Val

· Prepared LADWP historical flow cumulative average graphs - Period ending 10/21/15 - ValWSA - General

* FACT SHEET for BOARD - for All Future WSAs * Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion - Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon - 10/22/15 - Andrei * Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates - 10/15/15 * No new updates


* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15 * Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Need to submit transmittal letter.

Miscellaneous

* Val's Transition to New Group - Earl * Val notified that he will be moving to new group - 10/13/15 * Negotiated with Ehinomen Nwani on 10/21/15 and agreed to Val's first day with new group will be11/16/15. Water Resources will be able to e-mail limited questions after that time. * Notified Time Keeping of Val's transition date. No further action required. * Sent memo on Oct. 15, 2015 to Time Keeping to request advancement of Val from CEAI to CEAIIon October 27, 2015. * Followed up and told Time Keeping that Val had no more time off since promotion dateestablished. * Jin took Contract Admin Class on 10/9/15 * 8 am - 12pm * Attended EPRI tour at LAAFP to answer W/E Nexus questions (most of day) on 10/19/15 - Earl * Attended Interview and Selection class on Tuesday, 10/20/15, 8am-4pm (A5B) - Earl * Plan to attend Contract Administration class on Friday, 10/23/15, 8am-12pm - Andrei * Jin on Vacation: 10/19/15 - 10/27/15, inclusive. * Andrei planned vacation: 10/27/15 & 10/28/15 * Assisted Mina (forgot last name) with WSA statistics (off-the-record) today and yesterday - 10/22/15 * Earl took 2.5 hrs B-time to get car towed to mechanic in morning.

Page 7862 of 8813



Please see comments.ThanksFrom: Kwan, DelonSent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 6:31 AMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151022

A couple of items if you can give me latest status:

· Move forward with issuing task order for proposal for Greg's GW strategic planI took a brief look at Task Order 2 but haven't made time to comment yet.

· Status of UC Davis prelimin results?Originally, the idea for preliminary EI results was for Downey presentation and not part of contract.Kendra stated that prelim results were individual values for nodes, and she did show some minor detailin her presentation. When I asked for update on preliminary EI value, she asked if I would like to have her pursue andsubmit preliminary EI value (for total system). I spoke with Val A. since he is the contract administrator and because the original request was foran outside-of-contract request. They both decided not to pursue it as they are closing in the their milestones and preliminary valuewould be the same as the one they are working on now. She said they are on track but no specific date was given.

· Remaining updates still needed for your UWMP draft chaptersVal N. is looking into that today.In short, we are waiting for update flow projections from Simon.Still need to confirm Carbon Factor for MWD facilities (are they using eGRID CMAX value or customvalueVal found some mistakes in his treatment calcs.He should complete today and I will go over with him so we should have answer in next day or so.

· Send me latest link to updated draft internal w/e nexus reportI will forward you a link momentarily.There are two documents: The W/E Nexus report, and the documentation of W/E Nexus which isinternal and provides more details.Thanks.

From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:20 PMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151022

Date: Tue Oct 27 2015 07:44:40 PDTAttachments:

Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.41636

Page 7863 of 8813

Delon,


Thanks

Agreement 47288-5 - Strategic Planning Services - Andrei




· Waiting on updated Task Proposal from Vendor - 5/14/15



* Requested on 9/11/15 * Assigned to staff on 9/11/15 * Comments due 10/26/15 * First draft to Earl for review 9/16/15 * Reviewed first draft 10/21/15 - Earl * Deferred to Distribution (only two paragraphs need review) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Submitted first draft to Delon for review (one comment only) - 10/21/15 - Earl * Received comments from Delon. Made changes and re-submitted - 10/22/15 - Earl * Waiting for Delon's approval for comments - 10/22/15 - DUE MONDAY 10/26/15 to PLANNING


* Request received 10/6/15 * Assigned to staff 10/7/15 * Comments due to Planning on 11/2/15

· Submitted comments for review to Earl on 10/21/15

· Reviewed and added approximately 20 comments to approximately 4-5 that were submitted. 90%complete with review and comments before submission to Delon - 10/22/15 - Earl



Page 7864 of 8813









· Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl

NOC Review for Crossroads Hollywood - Andrei







* Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP - 3/5/15. - Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data - 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task - 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station - 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 -7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis - 10/20/15.


* Received request on 10/9/15 * Read article and discussed with Andrei - 10/16/15 * First draft response to Earl - 10/16/15 * Provided a draft response & follow-ups to Delon and Earl - 10/20/15.

Talking Points for Milken Institute Climate Change Forum Oct. 20, 2015

Page 7865 of 8813

* Request Received on 10/16/15 - Due same day. * Draft talking points submitted to Delon - 10/16/15 * TASK COMPLETE





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcoming

Page 7866 of 8813

soon - 10/14/15 * No new updates

USR for Cahuenga Hotel - Andrei

* Received request 10/13/15 * Due 10/16/15 * Deferred to Distribution 10/16/15 * Comments Environmental 10/16/105 * TASK COMPLETE

UWMP 2015 Update

* Reviewed DWR Draft Guidelines and provided comments - 8/8/24/15 - Earl * Chapter 4 - Recycled Water * Review for other group and provide comments - Jin * Perform cursory review of Ch.4 - Earl * Chapter 8 - MWD Supplies * Submitted final draft to Earl - 8/26/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15

* Chapter 11 - WSA Section Only - Jin * Completed Chapter 11.4 WSA draft to Earl - 8/20/15 * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Need to check what is still needed for final draft

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)W/E Nexus Report Update

· Assigned to Val - 5/18/15

· Reviewed 2010 Water Energy Nexus report to identify updates - Val

· Need to ensure that methodologies for EI values for DS, WWT, CEC reporting, etc. are clearlyand completely included in update.

· Worked on the Water Energy nexus report. Submitted draft with comments to Earl. Need to meetwith Earl and identify the next steps - 9/30/15

· Cursory review of original report - 9/30/15 - Earl

· Worked on SWP Section verifying sources and documenting methodology - 10/8/15 - Val

Page 7867 of 8813

· Need to review:


o Val's documentation of SWP methodology, sources, etc (on separate document) - 10/8/15

§ Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15

o Began work schedule to complete W/E Nexus before 11/12/15

· Worked on GW, Distribution and CRA sections. Need to continue.

o Submitted partial draft of EI methodology Paper (not W/E Nexus Report) for review - 10/15/15

· Worked on the Water Energy nexus report/manual. RW and treatment sections. Need to continueW/E Nexus Work Plan Update

· Need to make plan and assign - Earl

· Instruct staff (Val) and provide guidelines to include re-organization of Galaxy folders, files,labeling, documentation into a user-friendly format - week of 9/7/15 - EarlTracking Template - Val

· Worked on the tracking spreadsheet met with Earl and went over the spreadsheet. Need tocontinue. - 6/10/15

o Provided input on features for spreadsheet - EarlGeneral/Other

· Sent request to Mariko for WS facilities kWh data 06/11/2015 - Val

· Prepared LADWP historical flow cumulative average graphs - Period ending 10/21/15 - ValWSA - General

* FACT SHEET for BOARD - for All Future WSAs * Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion - Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon - 10/22/15 - Andrei * Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates - 10/15/15 * No new updates


* Request Letter dated 7/2/15, but received 7/9/15 * Board Meeting Held (Approved) 10/6/15 * Board requested follow-up FACT SHEET for future WSAs (2 weeks in advance) * Notified Applicant of Board approval & pending waiting period by City Council - Andrei * Transmitted electronic copies of adopted WSA and Reso to Planning - 10/20/15. * Need to submit transmittal letter.

Miscellaneous

* Val's Transition to New Group - Earl * Val notified that he will be moving to new group - 10/13/15

Page 7868 of 8813

* Negotiated with Ehinomen Nwani on 10/21/15 and agreed to Val's first day with new group will be11/16/15. Water Resources will be able to e-mail limited questions after that time. * Notified Time Keeping of Val's transition date. No further action required. * Sent memo on Oct. 15, 2015 to Time Keeping to request advancement of Val from CEAI to CEAIIon October 27, 2015. * Followed up and told Time Keeping that Val had no more time off since promotion dateestablished. * Jin took Contract Admin Class on 10/9/15 * 8 am - 12pm * Attended EPRI tour at LAAFP to answer W/E Nexus questions (most of day) on 10/19/15 - Earl * Attended Interview and Selection class on Tuesday, 10/20/15, 8am-4pm (A5B) - Earl * Plan to attend Contract Administration class on Friday, 10/23/15, 8am-12pm - Andrei * Jin on Vacation: 10/19/15 - 10/27/15, inclusive. * Andrei planned vacation: 10/27/15 & 10/28/15 * Assisted Mina (forgot last name) with WSA statistics (off-the-record) today and yesterday - 10/22/15 * Earl took 2.5 hrs B-time to get car towed to mechanic in morning.

Page 7869 of 8813


Subject: Weekly Update 151119

Delon,


Thanks

STAFF PROJECTS

Earl

1. UC Davis EI Study

2. MWELO Update - finalize and distribute

3. Maria Brusher Response - Need to discuss with Delon

4. W/E Nexus Report - Assign after procedures complete

5. Climate Change Work Plan - Update

6. Re-organize W/E Nexus folders

7. Cost-benefit for Conservation Savings - need to assign

8. Energy Efficiency Goals - Monitor for Updates

9. Hidden Creeks - Respond when needed

10. Track ED5 Goals - Clarify Task - Review Project Folder

11. UMWP 2015 Update - On hold

12. W/E Nexus - Clarify Task - Review Project Folder

13. Will Serve Letter for Termo - Clarify Task - Review Project Folder

14. WSA Fact Sheet for Board (New Requirement) - Clarify Task - Review Project Folder

15. WUWC Case Study Comments - Clarify Task - Review Project Folder

16. WSA for LAMP - Initiate on 11/23/15


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.99681

Page 7998 of 8813

Jin

1. WSA Updates - Due 12/4/15

2. W/E Nexus Procedures - LAA, Hydrogeneration

3. W/E Nexus - Develop End-User Section

4. W/E Nexus - Develop In-Line Hydro Section & Presentation

5. WWT - Follow up on format for future data requests

6. UC Davis EI Study - Data Transfer, etc. - End 1/6/16

Andrei

1. Response to Nissen Desal Proposal - Draft 11/23/15, Final 11/25/15

2. Flow Science Contract - ConAd, Communication Plan

3. GW Banking - Palmdale

4. Run LAASM

5. NHC Proposal - Waiting for Reply from Delon

6. BDCP - Track and Update

7. Cost Impact Analysis for MWD vs SDCWA

8. Neenach Pump Station Tracking

WEEKLY SUMMARY

Last update: 11/13/15






· Task Order Proposal #2



Page 7999 of 8813


o Reviewed and commented on draft Proposal - 11/9/15 - Earl

o Printed out attachments and made CD disk for Task Order Proposal Request for Clerical - Earl andJin

· Task Order Authorization No. 1 (Based on Task Order Proposal No. 2)

o Drafted Task Order Authorization and submitted to Delon for review - 11/12/15 - Earl

§ No comments from Delon.

§ Received/incorporated changes from Greg Reed - 11/16/15

o Proposal (Second Draft) by Flow Science Received - 11/17/15

o Final Draft Task Order Authorization to Clerical with attachment - 11/18/15

· Change Request (Add Chris Helm to Appendix A - Hourly Rates)

o Assisted in correcting the omission of Kris Helm from the Exhibit A, Fee Schedule, of the Agreement- 11/17/15 - Andrei

o Final Draft to Clerical - 11/17/15 - Earl

· NOC - Prepare draft request to Labor Relations for conference call and provide Task OrderAuthorization - 11/18/15 - Earl

· Need to develop Communication Plan with GW, Flow Science for Task Order No. 1 - 11/19/15 -Earl

o Assigned to Andrei - 11/17/15

Bay Delta Conservation Plan - Andrei

* Asked Andrei to include in weekly updates, including status, expected milestone dates, etc. -11/19/15 - Earl


* Need to begin plan - 11/19/15 - Earl

Cost Impact of MWD vs. SDCWA Wheeling Rate Lawsuit - Andrei

* Delon asked me to review and make updates to an existing analysis of cost impact to MWDmember agencies from rate litigation between SDCWA and MWD. I began to work on the analysis -3/11/15. * Continued to work on the analysis. Was unable to identify all SWP elements of System Access andSystem Power Rates to complete the analysis - 3/18/15. * No new updates.

DEIR Review - General (Don't show unless progress)

* Planning requested revised distribution list for LADWP staff for EIR/DEIR reviews. - 4/14/15 * Need to respond to Planning with a revised distribution list. - Jin

Page 8000 of 8813

* Met with GW group for review process clarification - 11/18/15 - Earl * Revised DEIR Review Guidelines and distributed to staff with explanation - 11/19/15 - Earl * Reviewed Notice of Public Hearing and relevant sections of FEIR for 5901 Sunset Blvd (we hadcommented on the DEIR) to get an idea of how our comments are received by Planning - 11/19/15 -Earl * Shared findings back and forth with GW Group on DEIR reviews - 11/19/15 - Earl




* Original request date unknown. Reminder by Delon on 7/30/15 * Assigned to Staff - 7/30/15 * Andrei, Earl and Paul Scantlin met to define task, identify possibilities and limitations, and discusstraining - 8/20/15 * Created "Issues and Questions" summary sheet summarizing meeting - Earl * Briefly met with Delon but need to discuss further * Instructed staff to create agenda and set up meeting to include Delon in next couple weeks -10/8/15 * Asked staff to resume planning on this task - 11/19/15 - Earl

MWELO Updates - Jin

* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. - 10/29/15 - Earl * Need to discuss further, finalize, and send notice to staff - 11/19/15 - Earl









· Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan for

Page 8001 of 8813

Neenach. - 10/21/15 - Andrei and Earl

· Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS - 10/27/15

· No new updates





· Reviewed/researched to determine what type of response needed - 10/29/15 - Andrei

· Discuss potential response with Earl but need to contact City Planning to clarify what is needed.10/30/15 - Andrei

· Clarified with Andrei what was needed in review - week ending 11/5/15 - Earl

· Submitted first draft comments to Earl. Earl reviewed and sent back for incompleteness.Submitted second draft - 11/2/15

· Reviewed drafts and sent final comments to Environmental - 11/17/15 - Earl

· TASK COMPLETE




* Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP - 3/5/15. - Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data - 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task - 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station - 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 -7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis - 10/20/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis. Completed costs and benefits for 7 differentscenarios - 10/29/15. * Completed calculations for the analysis. A meeting to discuss the analysis is scheduled for 11/13/15(11/3/15 meeting was re-scheduled) - 11/3/15. * Prepared handouts for the meeting on 11/13/15 (re-scheduled for 11/18/15) - 11/6/15 - Andrei * Prepared to present the results of the study at the meeting on 11/18/15 (Re-scheduled for 11/24/15)- 11/17/15


* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15

Page 8002 of 8813

* Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway * Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15 * Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 11/13/15 - Earl * Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15 * Need to set up meeting to discuss with Delon week of 11/23/15 - Earl

Response to Nissen Desal Plant Proposal - Andrei

* Request received - 11/19/15 * Assigned to staff - 11/19/15 * First Draft Due to Earl - 11/23/15 * Final Draft Due for Delon's Review - 11/25/15




UC Davis Proposal (Energy Intensity Study): Contract End Date January 6, 2016

* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val

Page 8003 of 8813

* Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * Requested progress update to Val A., contract administrator - 11/5/15 - Earl * Received project update from Val A. and Kendra Olmos: * Due to Kendra's vacation, holidays, and unusual reading of contract due dates for review and finaldeliverable, all parties agreed that final report will be submitted by end of January, 2016, past the officialdue date for review. Val A., contract administrator, assured us this okay. - 11/9/15 * Jin tested her credentials and access to FTP server for UC Davis documents and was instructedon tracking all documents that are transmitting between DWP and UC Davis. * LASAN data from Mariko Marianes of Rates and Contract Group to UC Davis was e-mailed to ValA. & WRD Group. Data planned to upload to UC Davis FTP server on 11/16/15 by Jin - 11/13/15

· Forwarded questions from UC Davis to Victor Vargas and Adrian Perez of WETS regardingissues on running the model due to flow loops. - 11/10/15 - Jin

o Follow Reminder sent - 11/18/15

· Uploaded WW treatment and pumping plant energy use data from LASAN for UC Davis andnotified UC Davis of its availability. - 11/16/15

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Reportreview - Earl * Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - Jin * Reviewed entire Chapter carefully for any remaining updates, ensured latest data updates wereused, updated tables, etc. with latest data, submitted to Delon for review. Version submitted acceptedon previous changes, to-date, so only changes from this review were shown in track changes mode -11/3/15 - Earl * Received more recent flow projections from Peter Dugan, but was informed by Simon that thereare many more updates to come. - 11/10/15 * Requested update on Climate Change input from CDM from Simon. He said he will ask atmeeting on Monday, 11/23/15. - 11/19/15 - Earl

Page 8004 of 8813

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)End User (General) - Jin

· Reviewed status with Jin - Earl

· Jin asked to resume work on this item - Week of 9/1/15 - Earl

· Need to review End User study - 11/19/15Hydro Generation [LAA & In-City (Franklin & Sawtelle)] - Jin

· Compiled gross and net energy generation at Franklin and Sawtelle plants (hydroelectric plantswithin City limit), and found some discrepancies between 2 files received from the Power System.Power System contact mentioned 1 file is from the invoice, as opposed to the actual plant data. Needto find out more about getting plant data. - 4/28/15 - Jin

· Requested LAA & In-City energy generation plant data (as opposed to invoice data) from thePower System from 2008 to present in kWh at each hydroelectric plants. Data are expected to beavailable by 5/26/16. - 5/4/15 - Jin

· Received data but it was for 2011-2014. Need to review and request previous years - 5/28/15

· After data received, need to inform Power System, again, that data will be used in publicdocument calculations

· Received instruction from Paul to obtain LAA Hydro Plant Q data from "Whiskey" website andOwens George Reports. Also, obtained all meter numbers necessary to collect data and begancollecting data. Earl called Chief operator at Control Gorge (Mike Clarke) to discuss specifics of datasince we are not sure if data from Whiskey is through plant or include diverted water, and also to obtainmonthly version of OG report data (which shows flows specifically through plants) instead of daily toavoid having to compile data from 360 sheets onto one - 7/9/15 - Jin

· Still waiting on LAA Energy data for 2015 from Power System (May and June of CY 2015) -11/19/15 - Jin

* Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - JinIn-Line Hydro Generation (Headworks, NHPS, etc.)

· Determined that N. Hollywood P.S. has hydrogenation, but they are not operational due tomaintenance burden - 3/30/15 - Earl

* Worked on preparing PowerPoint presentation slides or W/E Nexus on regulator stationbypasses. - 11/16/15 - Jin * Obtained reports from WETS and Reviewed * Developed high-level outline and presented to Delon - 11/18/15 * Need to finalize outline * Need to research studies prior to 2010 (NHPS?) * Need to develop talking points and add images to slide presentation * Need to get flow and energy info for Headworks hydrogenation when available - Jin * Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. - 11/16/15 - Jin

· Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has not

Page 8005 of 8813

been operating to generate power. - 11/16/15

· Jose Martinez of Water Op informed that North Hollywood PP was designed to generate powerby pressure differential in the water system, but he has no other information/document on it. Josesuggested contacting someone in WETS for info. - 11/16/15

· Requested Benjamin Wong for more info on North Hollywood PP study. - 11/16/15

W/E Nexus Report Update(more general)


o Need to review and resume/re-assign task - 11/19/15W/E Nexus Procedure (detailed documentation for internal use)

· Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15

· Reviewed 50% of document and discussed with Val & Delon - 10/29/15 - Earl

· I asked Jin to review W/E Nexus Procedures, check footnotes, locate source data, developquestions, and learn and understand procedures, sources, and methodologies so that she will be ableto update in the future. Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl

· Held meetings with staff, individually and with both staff, to go over procedures.

· Reviewed various versions of draft - Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl

· Organized GW section, incorporated LA-17 analysis and Neenach PS analysis to the WE reportmanual - 151105 - Val

· Reviewing and commenting on Val's WEN procedure document. - 11/5/15 - Jin

· Sent current draft to Delon for review - 11/5/15 - Val

· Reviewed, commented on, and finalized portions of report by Val. Jin reviewed, commented on,and became familiar with report for transfer of knowledge. - 11/10/15 - Val, Jin and Earl

· Started adding a LAA section in Water Energy Nexus procedure document, and need to continue.- Oct 2015 - Jin

· Need to considering adding hydrogeneration for In-City (Sawtelle and Frankline) and In-line(North Hollywood, Headworks, Coldwater Canyon) - Earl and Jin

W/E Nexus Work Plan Update

· Need to make plan and assign - 11/19/15 - Earl

WSA - General - KEEP IN REPORT EVEN IF NO PROGRESS.

· WSA Board Question - "What is a SCAG Projection?" - Jin

· Draft Response to Earl - 5/14/15

· Earl needs to review, compile, and forward to Delon - 5/14/15

Page 8006 of 8813

* Phase III Water Conservation for City of LA * Mayor has until June 21 to submit amendments, if any. * Need to determine status of approval for inclusion in WSA boilerplate - Earl * FACT SHEET for BOARD - for All Future WSAs * Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion - Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon - 10/22/15 - Andrei * Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates - 10/15/15 * Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 -Jin * Mission & Manhattan Wells: Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in responseto GM's office. Found Manhattan Wells and Mission Wells project status on ladwp.com (seems thestatus is not up to date), and on WETS' intranet Project Reporter Information (up to date, 10/26/15), butdecided not to include this info in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 * Need to update WSA template.Sections we received updates on: - Jin

* MWD Appendix A (draft) from Earl - (received on 10/15/15): * Need to check all latest MWD updates for WSA and compare to Draft Appendix A for content.Do not replace current Appendix A until the Final draft received - 11/19/15 * GW from Chris Repp (received on 10/1/15) * WR from Mario Acevedo (received on 9/25/15) * BDCP from Andrei (no new updates as of 9/17/15) * Enhancing Stormwater Capture from Andy N. (received on 9/16/15) * CRA Supply info from Delon (received on 9/11/15)Sections we requested, but have not received updates on: - Jin

* Owens Lake Dust Mitigation info, request sent to Jaime Valenzuela (request sent on 9/30/15,reminder sent on 11/19/15, due 11/30/15) * Water Conservation, request sent to Penny Falcon (request sent on 9/14/15, reminder sent on11/19/15, due 11/30/15) * RW Outreach, request sent to Anthony Tew (request sent on 9/14/15, reminder sent on 11/19/15,due 11/30/15)Sections not requested: - Jin

* SFB Clean up: I'm only periodically checking the ladwp website for update info. (last checked inNovember 2015, and March 2015 version is still on ladwp's website). * Reclamation also posted the August 24 month study: Need to check if Reclamation also postedthe August 24 month study that sets the 2016 releases, review, and update accordingly in the WSAtemplate. * Need to add more details in Mono Basin section * Instructed staff to actively resume updates to WSA template - 11/19/15 - Earl

WSA for Landside Access Modernization Program - Not yet assigned

* Received phone call request from Ned Baldwin (consultant) requesting assistance initiating WSA.Los Angeles World Airports is Lead Agency. Told Ned I would send instructions on Monday, 11/23/15 -Earl

Miscellaneous

* Send e-mail request to Carolyn Casavan (consultant) and Maria Sison-Roces enquiring aboutextent of tracking of energy efficiency efforts and projects directly related to Water Systeminfrastructure, as opposed to appurtenant facility improvements (lighting upgrades to buildings, forexample) - 11/4/15 - Earl

Page 8007 of 8813

* No response received yet - 11/19/15 * Respond to Media Request for Albert Rodriquez - 11/13/15 * Attended ConAd Class (PMC101) in Caf. Conf. Rms. from 12-3pm on 11/16/15 - Earl * Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Info Hearing on Water Funding - Jin * Viewed hearing online and prepared summary notes for Kim Ohara. - 11/16/15 * Val's Transition - 11/16/15 * Determined that Val will take with him the following items: Keyboard, Main Chair, Phone (Iadvised Val and Ehinomen to wait until IT can update new cubicle number for phone for 911 response). * Val will not take: guest chair, desk, computer tower and monitor, cabinets, drawers. * Requested Enrollment (Approved) in Level 200 & 300 Supervisory Courses for February andMarch, 2016 - 11/18/15 - Earl * Held staff meetings and requested improvements to weekly summary reporting and resumption ofprevious tasks - 11/19/15 - Earl * Provide response and do research on El Nino and LAA run-off for David Pettijohn's Chamber ofCommerce presentation on 11/20/15 - Earl and Andrei

Page 8008 of 8813



Okay.I will set up a recurring meeting for Thursday.ThanksFrom: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 6:00 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151119

Please set up a regular meeting with me each week to go over assignments and status.

Thanks

________________________________From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 4:45 PMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151119Delon,


Thanks

STAFF PROJECTS

Earl









Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.103479

Page 8609 of 8813










Jin







Andrei




4. Run LAASM





WEEKLY SUMMARY


Page 8610 of 8813












* Task Order Authorization No. 1 (Based on Task Order Proposal No. 2)


* No comments from Delon.

* Received/incorporated changes from Greg Reed - 11/16/15



* Change Request (Add Chris Helm to Appendix A - Hourly Rates)



* NOC - Prepare draft request to Labor Relations for conference call and provide Task OrderAuthorization - 11/18/15 - Earl

* Need to develop Communication Plan with GW, Flow Science for Task Order No. 1 - 11/19/15 -Earl




Page 8611 of 8813






* Planning requested revised distribution list for LADWP staff for EIR/DEIR reviews. - 4/14/15

* Need to respond to Planning with a revised distribution list. - Jin





* Original request date unknown. Reminder by Delon on 7/30/15 * Assigned to Staff - 7/30/15 * Andrei, Earl and Paul Scantlin met to define task, identify possibilities and limitations, and discusstraining - 8/20/15

* Created "Issues and Questions" summary sheet summarizing meeting - Earl

* Briefly met with Delon but need to discuss further * Instructed staff to create agenda and set up meeting to include Delon in next couple weeks -10/8/15 * Asked staff to resume planning on this task - 11/19/15 - Earl

MWELO Updates - Jin

* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl

Page 8612 of 8813

* Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. - 10/29/15 - Earl * Need to discuss further, finalize, and send notice to staff - 11/19/15 - Earl











* No new updates









* Reviewed drafts and sent final comments to Environmental - 11/17/15 - Earl

* TASK COMPLETE




Page 8613 of 8813



* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15 * Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway

* Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15

* Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 11/13/15 - Earl

* Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15

* Need to set up meeting to discuss with Delon week of 11/23/15 - Earl







Page 8614 of 8813

* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl

* Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl

* Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * Requested progress update to Val A., contract administrator - 11/5/15 - Earl * Received project update from Val A. and Kendra Olmos:

* Due to Kendra's vacation, holidays, and unusual reading of contract due dates for review and finaldeliverable, all parties agreed that final report will be submitted by end of January, 2016, past the officialdue date for review. Val A., contract administrator, assured us this okay. - 11/9/15 * Jin tested her credentials and access to FTP server for UC Davis documents and was instructedon tracking all documents that are transmitting between DWP and UC Davis. * LASAN data from Mariko Marianes of Rates and Contract Group to UC Davis was e-mailed to ValA. & WRD Group. Data planned to upload to UC Davis FTP server on 11/16/15 by Jin - 11/13/15

* Forwarded questions from UC Davis to Victor Vargas and Adrian Perez of WETS regardingissues on running the model due to flow loops. - 11/10/15 - Jin

Page 8615 of 8813


* Uploaded WW treatment and pumping plant energy use data from LASAN for UC Davis andnotified UC Davis of its availability. - 11/16/15

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change

* Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val

* Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon - 9/17/15 - Earl

* Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin


* Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Reportreview - Earl * Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - Jin * Reviewed entire Chapter carefully for any remaining updates, ensured latest data updates wereused, updated tables, etc. with latest data, submitted to Delon for review. Version submitted acceptedon previous changes, to-date, so only changes from this review were shown in track changes mode -11/3/15 - Earl * Received more recent flow projections from Peter Dugan, but was informed by Simon that thereare many more updates to come. - 11/10/15 * Requested update on Climate Change input from CDM from Simon. He said he will ask atmeeting on Monday, 11/23/15. - 11/19/15 - Earl


* Reviewed status with Jin - Earl

* Jin asked to resume work on this item - Week of 9/1/15 - Earl

* Need to review End User study - 11/19/15Hydro Generation [LAA & In-City (Franklin & Sawtelle)] - Jin




* After data received, need to inform Power System, again, that data will be used in public

Page 8616 of 8813

document calculations


* Still waiting on LAA Energy data for 2015 from Power System (May and June of CY 2015) -11/19/15 - Jin



* Worked on preparing PowerPoint presentation slides or W/E Nexus on regulator stationbypasses. - 11/16/15 - Jin

* Obtained reports from WETS and Reviewed * Developed high-level outline and presented to Delon - 11/18/15 * Need to finalize outline * Need to research studies prior to 2010 (NHPS?) * Need to develop talking points and add images to slide presentation

* Need to get flow and energy info for Headworks hydrogenation when available - Jin * Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. - 11/16/15 - Jin

* Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. - 11/16/15

* Jose Martinez of Water Op informed that North Hollywood PP was designed to generate powerby pressure differential in the water system, but he has no other information/document on it. Josesuggested contacting someone in WETS for info. - 11/16/15

* Requested Benjamin Wong for more info on North Hollywood PP study. - 11/16/15W/E Nexus Report Update(more general)o Val's first draft identification of updates - 10/8/15 - Earlo Need to review and resume/re-assign task - 11/19/15W/E Nexus Procedure (detailed documentation for internal use)* Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15* Reviewed 50% of document and discussed with Val & Delon - 10/29/15 - Earl* I asked Jin to review W/E Nexus Procedures, check footnotes, locate source data, developquestions, and learn and understand procedures, sources, and methodologies so that she will be ableto update in the future. Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl* Held meetings with staff, individually and with both staff, to go over procedures.* Reviewed various versions of draft - Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl* Organized GW section, incorporated LA-17 analysis and Neenach PS analysis to the WE reportmanual - 151105 - Val

Page 8617 of 8813

* Reviewing and commenting on Val's WEN procedure document. - 11/5/15 - Jin* Sent current draft to Delon for review - 11/5/15 - Val* Reviewed, commented on, and finalized portions of report by Val. Jin reviewed, commented on,and became familiar with report for transfer of knowledge. - 11/10/15 - Val, Jin and Earl* Started adding a LAA section in Water Energy Nexus procedure document, and need tocontinue. - Oct 2015 - Jin* Need to considering adding hydrogeneration for In-City (Sawtelle and Frankline) and In-line(North Hollywood, Headworks, Coldwater Canyon) - Earl and Jin

W/E Nexus Work Plan Update* Need to make plan and assign - 11/19/15 - Earl


* WSA Board Question - "What is a SCAG Projection?" - Jin

* Draft Response to Earl - 5/14/15

* Earl needs to review, compile, and forward to Delon - 5/14/15

* Phase III Water Conservation for City of LA

* Mayor has until June 21 to submit amendments, if any. * Need to determine status of approval for inclusion in WSA boilerplate - Earl

* FACT SHEET for BOARD - for All Future WSAs

* Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion - Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon - 10/22/15 - Andrei

* Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates - 10/15/15 * Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 -Jin * Mission & Manhattan Wells: Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in responseto GM's office. Found Manhattan Wells and Mission Wells project status on ladwp.com (seems thestatus is not up to date), and on WETS' intranet Project Reporter Information (up to date, 10/26/15), butdecided not to include this info in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 * Need to update WSA template.Sections we received updates on: - Jin

* MWD Appendix A (draft) from Earl - (received on 10/15/15):

* Need to check all latest MWD updates for WSA and compare to Draft Appendix A for content.Do not replace current Appendix A until the Final draft received - 11/19/15

* GW from Chris Repp (received on 10/1/15) * WR from Mario Acevedo (received on 9/25/15) * BDCP from Andrei (no new updates as of 9/17/15) * Enhancing Stormwater Capture from Andy N. (received on 9/16/15) * CRA Supply info from Delon (received on 9/11/15)Sections we requested, but have not received updates on: - Jin

* Owens Lake Dust Mitigation info, request sent to Jaime Valenzuela (request sent on 9/30/15,reminder sent on 11/19/15, due 11/30/15)

Page 8618 of 8813

* Water Conservation, request sent to Penny Falcon (request sent on 9/14/15, reminder sent on11/19/15, due 11/30/15) * RW Outreach, request sent to Anthony Tew (request sent on 9/14/15, reminder sent on 11/19/15,due 11/30/15)Sections not requested: - Jin

* SFB Clean up: I'm only periodically checking the ladwp website for update info. (last checked inNovember 2015, and March 2015 version is still on ladwp's website). * Reclamation also posted the August 24 month study: Need to check if Reclamation also postedthe August 24 month study that sets the 2016 releases, review, and update accordingly in the WSAtemplate. * Need to add more details in Mono Basin section

* Instructed staff to actively resume updates to WSA template - 11/19/15 - Earl



Miscellaneous


* No response received yet - 11/19/15

* Respond to Media Request for Albert Rodriquez - 11/13/15 * Attended ConAd Class (PMC101) in Caf. Conf. Rms. from 12-3pm on 11/16/15 - Earl * Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Info Hearing on Water Funding - Jin

* Viewed hearing online and prepared summary notes for Kim Ohara. - 11/16/15

* Val's Transition - 11/16/15

* Determined that Val will take with him the following items: Keyboard, Main Chair, Phone (Iadvised Val and Ehinomen to wait until IT can update new cubicle number for phone for 911 response). * Val will not take: guest chair, desk, computer tower and monitor, cabinets, drawers.

* Requested Enrollment (Approved) in Level 200 & 300 Supervisory Courses for February andMarch, 2016 - 11/18/15 - Earl * Held staff meetings and requested improvements to weekly summary reporting and resumption ofprevious tasks - 11/19/15 - Earl * Provide response and do research on El Nino and LAA run-off for David Pettijohn's Chamber ofCommerce presentation on 11/20/15 - Earl and Andrei

Page 8619 of 8813



Delon,We already have a weekly calendar appointment for Thursday, from 2:30 pm to 3:00 pm, including you,me and Simon.To prevent clutter of our calendars, instead of setting up a new appointment, I would prefer to insteadhonor that appointment weekly and see you individually or as you prefer.Time of day would be flexible of course.Are you okay with this?ThanksFrom: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Monday, November 23, 2015 10:09 AMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151119

Okay.I will set up a recurring meeting for Thursday.ThanksFrom: Kwan, DelonSent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 6:00 PMTo: Moosbrugger, EarlSubject: RE: Weekly Update 151119


Thanks

________________________________From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 4:45 PMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151119Delon,


Thanks

STAFF PROJECTS

Earl



Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.103492

Page 8620 of 8813
















Jin







Andrei




4. Run LAASM


Page 8621 of 8813




WEEKLY SUMMARY













* Task Order Authorization No. 1 (Based on Task Order Proposal No. 2)


* No comments from Delon.

* Received/incorporated changes from Greg Reed - 11/16/15



* Change Request (Add Chris Helm to Appendix A - Hourly Rates)



Page 8622 of 8813

* NOC - Prepare draft request to Labor Relations for conference call and provide Task OrderAuthorization - 11/18/15 - Earl

* Need to develop Communication Plan with GW, Flow Science for Task Order No. 1 - 11/19/15 -Earl









* Planning requested revised distribution list for LADWP staff for EIR/DEIR reviews. - 4/14/15

* Need to respond to Planning with a revised distribution list. - Jin





* Original request date unknown. Reminder by Delon on 7/30/15 * Assigned to Staff - 7/30/15 * Andrei, Earl and Paul Scantlin met to define task, identify possibilities and limitations, and discusstraining - 8/20/15

* Created "Issues and Questions" summary sheet summarizing meeting - Earl

Page 8623 of 8813

* Briefly met with Delon but need to discuss further * Instructed staff to create agenda and set up meeting to include Delon in next couple weeks -10/8/15 * Asked staff to resume planning on this task - 11/19/15 - Earl

MWELO Updates - Jin

* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. - 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates - 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. -10/14/15 - Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance -10/16/15 - Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. - 10/29/15 - Earl * Need to discuss further, finalize, and send notice to staff - 11/19/15 - Earl











* No new updates








Page 8624 of 8813


* Reviewed drafts and sent final comments to Environmental - 11/17/15 - Earl

* TASK COMPLETE






* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria - 2/26/15 * Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon - 5/7/15 -Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway

* Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions -10/29/15

* Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon - 11/13/15 - Earl

* Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University - 10/29/15

* Need to set up meeting to discuss with Delon week of 11/23/15 - Earl



Page 8625 of 8813





* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 - Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. - 7/15/15 - Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis - 7/16/15 - Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) - Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 - Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime - Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 - Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additionaldata would benefit results of model - 7/22/15 - Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 - Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model - 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 - Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 - Val * Submitted responses to Kendra's additional questions 8/18/15 - Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally - 8/20/15 -Earl

* Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded - 8/27/15 - Earl

* Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val - Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study - 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon - 10/14/15 * Requested progress update to Val A., contract administrator - 11/5/15 - Earl

Page 8626 of 8813

* Received project update from Val A. and Kendra Olmos:

* Due to Kendra's vacation, holidays, and unusual reading of contract due dates for review and finaldeliverable, all parties agreed that final report will be submitted by end of January, 2016, past the officialdue date for review. Val A., contract administrator, assured us this okay. - 11/9/15 * Jin tested her credentials and access to FTP server for UC Davis documents and was instructedon tracking all documents that are transmitting between DWP and UC Davis. * LASAN data from Mariko Marianes of Rates and Contract Group to UC Davis was e-mailed to ValA. & WRD Group. Data planned to upload to UC Davis FTP server on 11/16/15 by Jin - 11/13/15

* Forwarded questions from UC Davis to Victor Vargas and Adrian Perez of WETS regardingissues on running the model due to flow loops. - 11/10/15 - Jin


* Uploaded WW treatment and pumping plant energy use data from LASAN for UC Davis andnotified UC Davis of its availability. - 11/16/15

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 - Climate Change

* Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon's group for review - 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft - Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section -9/16/15 - Val


* Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. - 9/11/15 - Jin


* Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete - 10/8/15 - Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Reportreview - Earl * Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . - 11/2/15 - Jin * Reviewed entire Chapter carefully for any remaining updates, ensured latest data updates wereused, updated tables, etc. with latest data, submitted to Delon for review. Version submitted acceptedon previous changes, to-date, so only changes from this review were shown in track changes mode -11/3/15 - Earl * Received more recent flow projections from Peter Dugan, but was informed by Simon that thereare many more updates to come. - 11/10/15 * Requested update on Climate Change input from CDM from Simon. He said he will ask atmeeting on Monday, 11/23/15. - 11/19/15 - Earl


* Reviewed status with Jin - Earl

* Jin asked to resume work on this item - Week of 9/1/15 - Earl

* Need to review End User study - 11/19/15Hydro Generation [LAA & In-City (Franklin & Sawtelle)] - Jin

Page 8627 of 8813




* After data received, need to inform Power System, again, that data will be used in publicdocument calculations


* Still waiting on LAA Energy data for 2015 from Power System (May and June of CY 2015) -11/19/15 - Jin



* Worked on preparing PowerPoint presentation slides or W/E Nexus on regulator stationbypasses. - 11/16/15 - Jin

* Obtained reports from WETS and Reviewed * Developed high-level outline and presented to Delon - 11/18/15 * Need to finalize outline * Need to research studies prior to 2010 (NHPS?) * Need to develop talking points and add images to slide presentation

* Need to get flow and energy info for Headworks hydrogenation when available - Jin * Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. - 11/16/15 - Jin

* Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. - 11/16/15

* Jose Martinez of Water Op informed that North Hollywood PP was designed to generate powerby pressure differential in the water system, but he has no other information/document on it. Josesuggested contacting someone in WETS for info. - 11/16/15

* Requested Benjamin Wong for more info on North Hollywood PP study. - 11/16/15

Page 8628 of 8813

W/E Nexus Report Update(more general)o Val's first draft identification of updates - 10/8/15 - Earlo Need to review and resume/re-assign task - 11/19/15W/E Nexus Procedure (detailed documentation for internal use)* Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15* Reviewed 50% of document and discussed with Val & Delon - 10/29/15 - Earl* I asked Jin to review W/E Nexus Procedures, check footnotes, locate source data, developquestions, and learn and understand procedures, sources, and methodologies so that she will be ableto update in the future. Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl* Held meetings with staff, individually and with both staff, to go over procedures.* Reviewed various versions of draft - Week ending 11/5/15 - Earl* Organized GW section, incorporated LA-17 analysis and Neenach PS analysis to the WE reportmanual - 151105 - Val* Reviewing and commenting on Val's WEN procedure document. - 11/5/15 - Jin* Sent current draft to Delon for review - 11/5/15 - Val* Reviewed, commented on, and finalized portions of report by Val. Jin reviewed, commented on,and became familiar with report for transfer of knowledge. - 11/10/15 - Val, Jin and Earl* Started adding a LAA section in Water Energy Nexus procedure document, and need tocontinue. - Oct 2015 - Jin* Need to considering adding hydrogeneration for In-City (Sawtelle and Frankline) and In-line(North Hollywood, Headworks, Coldwater Canyon) - Earl and Jin

W/E Nexus Work Plan Update* Need to make plan and assign - 11/19/15 - Earl


* WSA Board Question - "What is a SCAG Projection?" - Jin

* Draft Response to Earl - 5/14/15

* Earl needs to review, compile, and forward to Delon - 5/14/15

* Phase III Water Conservation for City of LA

* Mayor has until June 21 to submit amendments, if any. * Need to determine status of approval for inclusion in WSA boilerplate - Earl

* FACT SHEET for BOARD - for All Future WSAs

* Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion - Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon - 10/22/15 - Andrei

* Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates - 10/15/15 * Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 -Jin * Mission & Manhattan Wells: Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in responseto GM's office. Found Manhattan Wells and Mission Wells project status on ladwp.com (seems thestatus is not up to date), and on WETS' intranet Project Reporter Information (up to date, 10/26/15), butdecided not to include this info in response to GM's office. - 11/17/15 * Need to update WSA template.Sections we received updates on: - Jin

* MWD Appendix A (draft) from Earl - (received on 10/15/15):

Page 8629 of 8813

* Need to check all latest MWD updates for WSA and compare to Draft Appendix A for content.Do not replace current Appendix A until the Final draft received - 11/19/15

* GW from Chris Repp (received on 10/1/15) * WR from Mario Acevedo (received on 9/25/15) * BDCP from Andrei (no new updates as of 9/17/15) * Enhancing Stormwater Capture from Andy N. (received on 9/16/15) * CRA Supply info from Delon (received on 9/11/15)Sections we requested, but have not received updates on: - Jin


* SFB Clean up: I'm only periodically checking the ladwp website for update info. (last checked inNovember 2015, and March 2015 version is still on ladwp's website). * Reclamation also posted the August 24 month study: Need to check if Reclamation also postedthe August 24 month study that sets the 2016 releases, review, and update accordingly in the WSAtemplate. * Need to add more details in Mono Basin section

* Instructed staff to actively resume updates to WSA template - 11/19/15 - Earl



Miscellaneous


* No response received yet - 11/19/15

* Respond to Media Request for Albert Rodriquez - 11/13/15 * Attended ConAd Class (PMC101) in Caf. Conf. Rms. from 12-3pm on 11/16/15 - Earl * Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Info Hearing on Water Funding - Jin

* Viewed hearing online and prepared summary notes for Kim Ohara. - 11/16/15

* Val's Transition - 11/16/15

* Determined that Val will take with him the following items: Keyboard, Main Chair, Phone (Iadvised Val and Ehinomen to wait until IT can update new cubicle number for phone for 911 response). * Val will not take: guest chair, desk, computer tower and monitor, cabinets, drawers.

* Requested Enrollment (Approved) in Level 200 & 300 Supervisory Courses for February and

Page 8630 of 8813

March, 2016 - 11/18/15 - Earl * Held staff meetings and requested improvements to weekly summary reporting and resumption ofprevious tasks - 11/19/15 - Earl * Provide response and do research on El Nino and LAA run-off for David Pettijohn's Chamber ofCommerce presentation on 11/20/15 - Earl and Andrei

Page 8631 of 8813




Thanks

________________________________From: Moosbrugger, EarlSent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 4:45 PMTo: Kwan, DelonSubject: Weekly Update 151119

Delon,


Thanks

STAFF PROJECTS

Earl


2. MWELO Update – finalize and distribute

3. Maria Brusher Response – Need to discuss with Delon

4. W/E Nexus Report – Assign after procedures complete



7. Cost-benefit for Conservation Savings – need to assign

8. Energy Efficiency Goals – Monitor for Updates

9. Hidden Creeks – Respond when needed

10. Track ED5 Goals – Clarify Task – Review Project Folder

11. UMWP 2015 Update – On hold


Bcc:

Document ID: 0.7.522.99964

Page 8632 of 8813

12. W/E Nexus – Clarify Task – Review Project Folder

13. Will Serve Letter for Termo – Clarify Task – Review Project Folder

14. WSA Fact Sheet for Board (New Requirement) - Clarify Task – Review Project Folder

15. WUWC Case Study Comments – Clarify Task – Review Project Folder

16. WSA for LAMP – Initiate on 11/23/15

Jin

1. WSA Updates – Due 12/4/15

2. W/E Nexus Procedures – LAA, Hydrogeneration

3. W/E Nexus – Develop End-User Section

4. W/E Nexus – Develop In-Line Hydro Section & Presentation

5. WWT – Follow up on format for future data requests

6. UC Davis EI Study – Data Transfer, etc. – End 1/6/16

Andrei

1. Response to Nissen Desal Proposal – Draft 11/23/15, Final 11/25/15

2. Flow Science Contract – ConAd, Communication Plan

3. GW Banking – Palmdale

4. Run LAASM

5. NHC Proposal – Waiting for Reply from Delon

6. BDCP – Track and Update



WEEKLY SUMMARY


Agreement 47288-5 – Strategic Planning Services – Flow Science - Andrei

· Received a draft TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science. Reviewed the draft and prepared for theconference call on Thursday, March 26, 2015 – 3/24/15.

· Received and reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science following the conferencecall – 4/1/15

Page 8633 of 8813

· Reviewed a revised TO Proposal No. 1 from Flow Science – 5/4/15.

· Sent Agreement to Greg Reed – 10/21/15

· Task Order Proposal #2

o Incorporated input from Greg Reed & obtained attachments – Week ending 10/30/15

o Made other edits (Delon with have signature Authority) – 10/29/15

o Sent to Clerical for processing – 10/30/15

o Reviewed and commented on draft Proposal – 11/9/15 – Earl

o Printed out attachments and made CD disk for Task Order Proposal Request for Clerical – Earl andJin

· Task Order Authorization No. 1 (Based on Task Order Proposal No. 2)

o Drafted Task Order Authorization and submitted to Delon for review – 11/12/15 – Earl

§ No comments from Delon.

§ Received/incorporated changes from Greg Reed – 11/16/15

o Proposal (Second Draft) by Flow Science Received – 11/17/15

o Final Draft Task Order Authorization to Clerical with attachment – 11/18/15

· Change Request (Add Chris Helm to Appendix A – Hourly Rates)

o Assisted in correcting the omission of Kris Helm from the Exhibit A, Fee Schedule, of the Agreement– 11/17/15 – Andrei

o Final Draft to Clerical – 11/17/15 – Earl

· NOC – Prepare draft request to Labor Relations for conference call and provide Task OrderAuthorization – 11/18/15 – Earl

· Need to develop Communication Plan with GW, Flow Science for Task Order No. 1 – 11/19/15 –Earl

o Assigned to Andrei – 11/17/15

Bay Delta Conservation Plan – Andrei

* Asked Andrei to include in weekly updates, including status, expected milestone dates, etc. –11/19/15 – Earl

Climate Change Work Plan – Earl

* Need to begin plan – 11/19/15 – Earl

Cost Impact of MWD vs. SDCWA Wheeling Rate Lawsuit – Andrei

Page 8634 of 8813

* Delon asked me to review and make updates to an existing analysis of cost impact to MWDmember agencies from rate litigation between SDCWA and MWD. I began to work on the analysis –3/11/15. * Continued to work on the analysis. Was unable to identify all SWP elements of System Access andSystem Power Rates to complete the analysis – 3/18/15. * No new updates.

DEIR Review – General (Don’t show unless progress)

* Planning requested revised distribution list for LADWP staff for EIR/DEIR reviews. – 4/14/15 * Need to respond to Planning with a revised distribution list. – Jin * Met with GW group for review process clarification – 11/18/15 – Earl * Revised DEIR Review Guidelines and distributed to staff with explanation – 11/19/15 – Earl * Reviewed Notice of Public Hearing and relevant sections of FEIR for 5901 Sunset Blvd (we hadcommented on the DEIR) to get an idea of how our comments are received by Planning – 11/19/15 –Earl * Shared findings back and forth with GW Group on DEIR reviews – 11/19/15 – Earl

Executive Directive 5 – Progress Tracking

* Request received by Delon to track how we are progressing toward ED5 goals annually – 11/3/15 * Due approximately 12/3/15 * Need to discuss with Delon – 11/19/15 – Earl

LAASM and LAA Run-off Model Operation by Water Resources Development – Andrei (New Item – Notincluded in 9/17/15 weekly update). Added on 9/18/15

* Original request date unknown. Reminder by Delon on 7/30/15 * Assigned to Staff – 7/30/15 * Andrei, Earl and Paul Scantlin met to define task, identify possibilities and limitations, and discusstraining – 8/20/15 * Created “Issues and Questions” summary sheet summarizing meeting – Earl * Briefly met with Delon but need to discuss further * Instructed staff to create agenda and set up meeting to include Delon in next couple weeks –10/8/15 * Asked staff to resume planning on this task – 11/19/15 – Earl

MWELO Updates – Jin

* Listened in on the meeting via webinar. – 8/25/15 * Earl requested staff to review latest e-mail from DWR to check if new updates – 10/8/15 * Reviewed MWELO posted on CA Code of Regulations website and prepared a summary. –10/14/15 – Jin * Need to discuss with Jin and verify spreadsheet calcs are consistent with revised ordinance –10/16/15 – Earl * Discussed with Jin. She stated that revisions were made to calculations. – 10/29/15 – Earl * Need to discuss further, finalize, and send notice to staff – 11/19/15 – Earl

Neenach Turnout & DWR/AVEK/MWD Agreements – Andrei

· Cost Estimate at Completion approx. $55 Million (Phil Clark) – Earl – 5/6/15

· Andrei provided direct and burned costs up to reporting period and estimated at completionbased on WETS reporting – 5/7/15

· Contacted Mark Hampson to discuss timeline of testing and commissioning activities. The

Page 8635 of 8813

activities are currently scheduled for February 2015.

· Performed a study to estimate annual capital and O&M costs for Neenach – 5/14/15.

· Received request to comment on water quality study on SWP EB – 7/30/15

· Reviewed East Branch Pilot Study. Provided comments on the study – 8/5/15

· Earl requested to have update on construction completion date – 10/8/15

· Attended Meeting with Aqueduct, Water Quality and Water Control to discuss operations plan forNeenach. – 10/21/15 – Andrei and Earl

· Received electronic invoice from DWR. Waiting for hardcopy to process with WETS – 10/27/15

· No new updates

NOP Review for Crossroads Hollywood – Andrei

· Date received – 10/22/15

· Comments due – 11/12/15

· Assigned to staff – 10/22/15

· Reviewed/researched to determine what type of response needed – 10/29/15 – Andrei

· Discuss potential response with Earl but need to contact City Planning to clarify what is needed.10/30/15 – Andrei

· Clarified with Andrei what was needed in review – week ending 11/5/15 – Earl

· Submitted first draft comments to Earl. Earl reviewed and sent back for incompleteness.Submitted second draft – 11/2/15

· Reviewed drafts and sent final comments to Environmental – 11/17/15 – Earl

· TASK COMPLETE

Palmdale Water District GW Banking – Andrei

* Attended PWD Presentation in GW Banking in Palmdale – 2/25/15 – Andrei and Earl

· Attended follow-up meeting with Greg Reed – 2/26/15 – Andrei and Earl

* Began collaborating with Sarah Lacombe on cost-benefit analysis of groundwater banking forLADWP – 3/5/15. – Andrei * Met with Sarah to develop an outline for the analysis and identify unknowns and assumptions.Sarah will summarize the outline while I began to gather initial data – 3/9/15. Met with Sarah to continueto outline the task – 3/18/15. * Met with Sarah to continue to outline the task. Performed conversions from AFY to cfs and viceversa for design and other potential flows through Neenach Pump Station – 3/23/15. * Sarah and I presented initial findings to GW Rights and WR Development Groups on 7/22/15 –7/22/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis – 10/20/15. * Continued to work on the cost-benefit analysis. Completed costs and benefits for 7 different

Page 8636 of 8813

scenarios – 10/29/15. * Completed calculations for the analysis. A meeting to discuss the analysis is scheduled for 11/13/15(11/3/15 meeting was re-scheduled) – 11/3/15. * Prepared handouts for the meeting on 11/13/15 (re-scheduled for 11/18/15) – 11/6/15 – Andrei * Prepared to present the results of the study at the meeting on 11/18/15 (Re-scheduled for 11/24/15)– 11/17/15


* First conference call with Maria held 2/11/15 * Submitted Group One data to Maria – 2/26/15 * Received comments from Maria Brusher on 5/1/15. Need to provide comments to Delon – 5/7/15 –Earl * Received e-mail from Steven Kenway * Requested finalizing Project 4469 (current case study) by answering final list of questions –10/29/15 * Need to discuss task prioritization & pending response with Delon – 11/13/15 – Earl * Invited Water Resources Group/DWP to take part in upcoming case study, Project 4625, involvingWRF & Simon Frasier University – 10/29/15 * Need to set up meeting to discuss with Delon week of 11/23/15 – Earl


* Request received – 11/19/15 * Assigned to staff – 11/19/15 * First Draft Due to Earl – 11/23/15 * Final Draft Due for Delon’s Review – 11/25/15

Tetratech – Confidence Level Summary for Climate Change Conclusions - Andrei

* Purpose: To be able to describe, for a public audience, the confidence level(s) for conclusions onClimate Change from 2011 Tetratech Study * Assigned to Staff 10/5/15 * Discussed several times with staff – Week of 10/5/15 * Submitted First Draft (incomplete – need more time) – 10/8/15 – Andrei

* Submitted updated draft “Treatment of Uncertainties” – 10/9/15 – Andrei * Need to review – 11/19/15 – Earl


* Tour of LAAFP, UV Plant, and Van Norman Pump Station + follow-up Meeting all took place on6/18/15 – Jin and Earl * Submitted Franklin daily flow data (LAWSDAC data obtained by Val N.) to UC Davis. ReliableSawtelle flow data do not exist (Operations: Flow meter downstream of Lower Stone Canyon Reservoir(as LAWDAC diagram shows) does not accurately represent flow to Sawtelle. Was unable to find aflow meter number at Sawtelle to be used to get data in KISTERS. – 7/15/15 – Jin * Sent Final Post-Tour Questions to UC Davis – 7/16/15 – Val * Received additional questions from UC Davis (Soroya) – Val 7/20/15 * Sent data request to Robert Takashiki for missing SCADA data 7/16/15 – Val * Met with Earl and identified project schedule and quality control in order to complete the project ontime – Val * Robert requested to forward the data request to Water Transmission Operations. Worked on draftemail with Earl for data request 7/22/15 – Val * Spoke with Kendra and reduced scope of questions, discussed remaining schedule milestonesrequest, and confirmed that UC Davis is not waiting on data to continue work, but only that additional

Page 8637 of 8813

data would benefit results of model – 7/22/15 – Earl * Kendra confirmed that the project is on schedule and specified that proportional flow for regulatingstation estimates should be sufficient to complete modeling 07/24/2015 – Val * Earl informed UC Davis that DWP would be diligent about answering any remaining questions asdata became available to improve model – 7/24/15 * Delon sent follow up questions on regulating stations and trunk lines to Robert Tokashiki. Answerreceived confirmed that no further action could be taken. 7/28/15 * Conducted the conference call with UC Davis and Planning; forwarded RS spreadsheet from UCDavis to Planning 8/14/15 – Val * Talked to Victor Vargas (Planning); expected to get responses on 8/25-26/2015 – Val * Submitted responses to Kendra’s additional questions 8/18/15 – Val * Requested staff to compare DS pump list given to UC Davis to list provided by Gonzalo Reyes todetermine if gaps and to resolve and inform UC Davis if any, after issue discussed internally – 8/20/15 –Earl * Staff determined that there are no significant gaps in DS pump list given to UC Davis so no actionneeded – 8/27/15 – Earl * Uploaded RS data from Planning to the ftps server. Awaiting for comments from UC Davis folks8/25/15 * Need to discuss format of last data set uploaded to FTP server and review with Val – Earl * Contacted Kendra and requested for updates or preliminary results. No updates no results.09/15/2015 * UC Davis to present on October 14, 2015 at Green Team event at SoCal Gas center in Downey * Awaiting for UC Davis presentation on 10/14/15 and preliminary results of study – 151008 * Asked Kendra for update on preliminary results. Preliminary results not complete but forthcomingsoon – 10/14/15 * Requested progress update to Val A., contract administrator – 11/5/15 – Earl * Received project update from Val A. and Kendra Olmos: * Due to Kendra’s vacation, holidays, and unusual reading of contract due dates for review and finaldeliverable, all parties agreed that final report will be submitted by end of January, 2016, past the officialdue date for review. Val A., contract administrator, assured us this okay. – 11/9/15 * Jin tested her credentials and access to FTP server for UC Davis documents and was instructedon tracking all documents that are transmitting between DWP and UC Davis. * LASAN data from Mariko Marianes of Rates and Contract Group to UC Davis was e-mailed to ValA. & WRD Group. Data planned to upload to UC Davis FTP server on 11/16/15 by Jin – 11/13/15

· Forwarded questions from UC Davis to Victor Vargas and Adrian Perez of WETS regardingissues on running the model due to flow loops. – 11/10/15 – Jin

o Follow Reminder sent – 11/18/15

· Uploaded WW treatment and pumping plant energy use data from LASAN for UC Davis andnotified UC Davis of its availability. – 11/16/15

UWMP 2015 Update

* Chapter 12 – Climate Change * Reviewed, edited, and submitted to Delon and Simon’s group for review – 8/27/15 * Need to include in-City Hydro in DS calculation update for final draft – Earl * Need to continue updates on EI values for final version. * Worked on ch. 12 additional comments/write up to incorporate ED 5 goals to 12.3.1 section –9/16/15 – Val * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon – 9/17/15 – Earl * Updated RW section to incorporate West Basin RW EI. – 9/11/15 – Jin * Reviewed, edited & submitted to Delon – 9/17/15 – Earl * Sent e-mail to Simon for update on when final flow projections will be complete – 10/8/15 – Earl * Began checking for updates needed. Plan to resume 10/30/15 as part of W/E Nexus Report

Page 8638 of 8813

review – Earl * Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . – 11/2/15 – Jin * Reviewed entire Chapter carefully for any remaining updates, ensured latest data updates wereused, updated tables, etc. with latest data, submitted to Delon for review. Version submitted acceptedon previous changes, to-date, so only changes from this review were shown in track changes mode –11/3/15 – Earl * Received more recent flow projections from Peter Dugan, but was informed by Simon that thereare many more updates to come. – 11/10/15 * Requested update on Climate Change input from CDM from Simon. He said he will ask atmeeting on Monday, 11/23/15. – 11/19/15 – Earl

Water Energy Nexus (WEN) (Report Only Updated Sections)End User (General) – Jin

· Reviewed status with Jin – Earl

· Jin asked to resume work on this item – Week of 9/1/15 – Earl

· Need to review End User study – 11/19/15Hydro Generation [LAA & In-City (Franklin & Sawtelle)] – Jin

· Compiled gross and net energy generation at Franklin and Sawtelle plants (hydroelectric plantswithin City limit), and found some discrepancies between 2 files received from the Power System.Power System contact mentioned 1 file is from the invoice, as opposed to the actual plant data. Needto find out more about getting plant data. – 4/28/15 – Jin

· Requested LAA & In-City energy generation plant data (as opposed to invoice data) from thePower System from 2008 to present in kWh at each hydroelectric plants. Data are expected to beavailable by 5/26/16. – 5/4/15 – Jin

· Received data but it was for 2011-2014. Need to review and request previous years – 5/28/15

· After data received, need to inform Power System, again, that data will be used in publicdocument calculations

· Received instruction from Paul to obtain LAA Hydro Plant Q data from “Whiskey” website andOwens George Reports. Also, obtained all meter numbers necessary to collect data and begancollecting data. Earl called Chief operator at Control Gorge (Mike Clarke) to discuss specifics of datasince we are not sure if data from Whiskey is through plant or include diverted water, and also to obtainmonthly version of OG report data (which shows flows specifically through plants) instead of daily toavoid having to compile data from 360 sheets onto one – 7/9/15 – Jin

· Still waiting on LAA Energy data for 2015 from Power System (May and June of CY 2015) –11/19/15 – Jin

* Calculated LAA power generation in kWh/AF for FYE 10-14 . – 11/2/15 – JinIn-Line Hydro Generation (Headworks, NHPS, etc.)

· Determined that N. Hollywood P.S. has hydrogenation, but they are not operational due tomaintenance burden – 3/30/15 – Earl

* Worked on preparing PowerPoint presentation slides or W/E Nexus on regulator stationbypasses. – 11/16/15 – Jin * Obtained reports from WETS and Reviewed * Developed high-level outline and presented to Delon – 11/18/15 * Need to finalize outline

Page 8639 of 8813

* Need to research studies prior to 2010 (NHPS?) * Need to develop talking points and add images to slide presentation * Need to get flow and energy info for Headworks hydrogenation when available - Jin * Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. – 11/16/15 – Jin

· Gloria Williams of Water Op informed on 4/23/15 that North Hollywood PP is capable ofgenerating power, and is operated by the LADWP Water System. However, the primary goal of thispumping plant is not to generate power, but to supply a reliable supply of good quality water. It has notbeen operating to generate power. – 11/16/15

· Jose Martinez of Water Op informed that North Hollywood PP was designed to generate powerby pressure differential in the water system, but he has no other information/document on it. Josesuggested contacting someone in WETS for info. – 11/16/15

· Requested Benjamin Wong for more info on North Hollywood PP study. – 11/16/15

W/E Nexus Report Update(more general)

o Val’s first draft identification of updates – 10/8/15 – Earl

o Need to review and resume/re-assign task – 11/19/15W/E Nexus Procedure (detailed documentation for internal use)

· Cursory review performed period ending 10/21/15

· Reviewed 50% of document and discussed with Val & Delon – 10/29/15 – Earl

· I asked Jin to review W/E Nexus Procedures, check footnotes, locate source data, developquestions, and learn and understand procedures, sources, and methodologies so that she will be ableto update in the future. Week ending 11/5/15 – Earl

· Held meetings with staff, individually and with both staff, to go over procedures.

· Reviewed various versions of draft – Week ending 11/5/15 – Earl

· Organized GW section, incorporated LA-17 analysis and Neenach PS analysis to the WE reportmanual – 151105 – Val

· Reviewing and commenting on Val’s WEN procedure document. – 11/5/15 – Jin

· Sent current draft to Delon for review – 11/5/15 – Val

· Reviewed, commented on, and finalized portions of report by Val. Jin reviewed, commented on,and became familiar with report for transfer of knowledge. – 11/10/15 – Val, Jin and Earl

· Started adding a LAA section in Water Energy Nexus procedure document, and need to continue.– Oct 2015 – Jin

· Need to considering adding hydrogeneration for In-City (Sawtelle and Frankline) and In-line(North Hollywood, Headworks, Coldwater Canyon) - Earl and Jin

W/E Nexus Work Plan Update

Page 8640 of 8813

· Need to make plan and assign – 11/19/15 – Earl

WSA – General – KEEP IN REPORT EVEN IF NO PROGRESS.

· WSA Board Question – “What is a SCAG Projection?” – Jin

· Draft Response to Earl – 5/14/15

· Earl needs to review, compile, and forward to Delon – 5/14/15

* Phase III Water Conservation for City of LA * Mayor has until June 21 to submit amendments, if any. * Need to determine status of approval for inclusion in WSA boilerplate – Earl * FACT SHEET for BOARD – for All Future WSAs * Requested by Board at 10/6/15 Meeting * Waiting for Delon to think of format and initiate discussion – Earl * Draft Memo to Board for Fact Sheets sent to Delon – 10/22/15 – Andrei * Received MWD Draft Appendix A (not final draft) and forwarded to Jin to check if WSA needssubstantive updates – 10/15/15 * Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in response to GM’s office. – 11/17/15 –Jin * Mission & Manhattan Wells: Provided WSA sections to be updated to Delon to include in responseto GM’s office. Found Manhattan Wells and Mission Wells project status on ladwp.com (seems thestatus is not up to date), and on WETS’ intranet Project Reporter Information (up to date, 10/26/15), butdecided not to include this info in response to GM’s office. – 11/17/15 * Need to update WSA template.Sections we received updates on: - Jin

* MWD Appendix A (draft) from Earl – (received on 10/15/15): * Need to check all latest MWD updates for WSA and compare to Draft Appendix A for content.Do not replace current Appendix A until the Final draft received – 11/19/15 * GW from Chris Repp (received on 10/1/15) * WR from Mario Acevedo (received on 9/25/15) * BDCP from Andrei (no new updates as of 9/17/15) * Enhancing Stormwater Capture from Andy N. (received on 9/16/15) * CRA Supply info from Delon (received on 9/11/15)Sections we requested, but have not received updates on: - Jin


* SFB Clean up: I’m only periodically checking the ladwp website for update info. (last checked inNovember 2015, and March 2015 version is still on ladwp’s website). * Reclamation also posted the August 24 month study: Need to check if Reclamation also postedthe August 24 month study that sets the 2016 releases, review, and update accordingly in the WSAtemplate. * Need to add more details in Mono Basin section * Instructed staff to actively resume updates to WSA template – 11/19/15 – Earl

WSA for Landside Access Modernization Program – Not yet assigned

Page 8641 of 8813

* Received phone call request from Ned Baldwin (consultant) requesting assistance initiating WSA.Los Angeles World Airports is Lead Agency. Told Ned I would send instructions on Monday, 11/23/15 –Earl

Miscellaneous

* Send e-mail request to Carolyn Casavan (consultant) and Maria Sison-Roces enquiring aboutextent of tracking of energy efficiency efforts and projects directly related to Water Systeminfrastructure, as opposed to appurtenant facility improvements (lighting upgrades to buildings, forexample) – 11/4/15 – Earl * No response received yet – 11/19/15 * Respond to Media Request for Albert Rodriquez – 11/13/15 * Attended ConAd Class (PMC101) in Caf. Conf. Rms. from 12-3pm on 11/16/15 – Earl * Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Info Hearing on Water Funding - Jin * Viewed hearing online and prepared summary notes for Kim Ohara. – 11/16/15 * Val’s Transition – 11/16/15 * Determined that Val will take with him the following items: Keyboard, Main Chair, Phone (Iadvised Val and Ehinomen to wait until IT can update new cubicle number for phone for 911 response). * Val will not take: guest chair, desk, computer tower and monitor, cabinets, drawers. * Requested Enrollment (Approved) in Level 200 & 300 Supervisory Courses for February andMarch, 2016 – 11/18/15 – Earl * Held staff meetings and requested improvements to weekly summary reporting and resumption ofprevious tasks – 11/19/15 – Earl * Provide response and do research on El Nino and LAA run-off for David Pettijohn’s Chamber ofCommerce presentation on 11/20/15 – Earl and Andrei

Page 8642 of 8813

Document ID: 0.7.522.351270 From: Alejandro Huerta To ... · Alejandro A. Huerta Environmental...

Documents

Transcript of Document ID: 0.7.522.351270 From: Alejandro Huerta To ... · Alejandro A. Huerta Environmental...