Docket No. 50-271 BVY 03-116 · "Transition to isolated condition not credited Location of TSC Dose...
Transcript of Docket No. 50-271 BVY 03-116 · "Transition to isolated condition not credited Location of TSC Dose...
--
. ;1~
Docket No. 50-271BVY 03-116
Attachment 4
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
Proposed Technical Specification Change No. 262
Supplement No. 4
Alternative Source Term
Non-Proprietary Version of Calculation PSAT 301 9CF.QA.09
"Alternative Source Term Impact on NUREG-0737 Equipment Qualification,Vital Area Access, and Areas of Continuous Occupancy."
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 1 of 25Rev I
CALCULATION TITLE PAGE
CALCULATION NUMBER: PSAT 3019CF.QA.09
CALCULATIONT'ILE: AltenMaive SoUrce Term kPM On oNUREG-0737 EqupmnentQualification, Vital Area Access, and Areas of ContinuousOccupacy
ORIGINATORPrintlSifgpn ate
CHECKERPrint,/StunAate
IND REVIEWERPdint/Sigw~ate
REV: 0 James Metcalf Vera Geba
R. Shcr(ftr MicroShield Modefg - Section 3)
Vera Geba
I James Metcalf Davc Leaver Dave Leaver
2
3
4
REASON FOR REVISION: Noniconformance Btpt
0- initialissue N/A
I1- Complicevith I OCFR2.790, June 2003 NIAProprietay designation removed fiom all pages except first
page and those actually contaning propietary informationProprietary information on each proprietary page designated in 11bracktsll
UNCONTROLLED COPYFOR INFORMATION ONLY
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg2of25Rev I
Table of Contents
Section Page
Purpose 2
Summary of Results 3
Methodology 3
Assumptions 3
References 3
Design Inputs 4
Calculation 7
Results 24
Conclusions 25
Attachment 1 - RB Activities vs. Time for TSC Shine Calculation (3 pages)
Attachment 2 - Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation (13 pages)
Attachment 3 - Impact of Skyshine on the Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation (4pages)
Attachment 4 - MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP (26 pages).
Purpose
This calculation is prepared by Polestar Applied Technology, Inc. for Vermont Yankee (VY) todetermine the impact of AST (Reference 1) on three aspects of NUREG-0737 (Reference 2) underItem ll.B.2, Plant Shielding. These are:
Equipment Qualification,
Vital Area Access, and
Protection of Areas Requiring Continuous Occupancy (e.g., Control Room and Technical SupportCenter).
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 3 of 25Rev I
Summary of Results
1. Equipment Qualification can continue to be based on TID-14844.
2. Vital area access can continue to be based on TID-14844
3. The 30-day TSC dose is 3.5 rem TEDE. This is less than the 5 rem TEDE limit.
Methodology
The calculation is divided into three sections in order to address each of the three topics. TheEquipment Qualification (EQ) section is, for the most part, qualitative since the NRC's position onthe potential need for modifying EQ requirments has been made known (Reference 3), and Polestaragrees that no change in approach is warranted.
For vital area access, Polestar is providing a generic assessment of the dose potential for both shineand inhalation doses, comparing the AST (Reference 1) to the current licensing basis (CLB) for VYwhich is TID-14844 (Reference 4). It is shown that TID-14844 is inherently limiting, and that achange in source terms alone is not a basis for reassessing vital area access. If changes are neededfor other reasons, it is acceptable to continue to use the TID-14844 source terms and to makechanges within that context. For example, for Extended Power Uprate (EPU) it would be necessaryto scale up the result by core inventory impact, but not to necessarily change the source term used inthe analysis.
For the Technical Support Center (TSC), a reanalysis of the 30-day dose has been made based onthe reanalysis of the Control Room 30-day dose in Reference 5. In Reference 5, the STARDOSE1.01 code (Reference 6) was used only for independent verification; but in this analysis, it is used togenerate the activities used for assessment of both the inhalation and the shine pathways for theTSC.
Assumptions
None other than those discussed in Reference 5.
References
1. "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents atNuclear Power Reactors", US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.183, Revision 0, July 2000.
2. NUREG-0737, "Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements", November 1980
3. Memorandum from Jack Rosenthal (Safety Margins and Systems Analysis Branch Chief)to Ashok Thadani, Director of NRR (ADAMS Accession No. MLOI 12103480), April 30,2001
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 4 of 25Rev 1
4. J.J. DiNunno et al., "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites",USAEC TID-14844, US Atomic Energy Commission (now US NRC), 1962
5. PSAT 3019CF.QA.08, "Radiological Evaluation of a DBA-Loss of Coolant Accident",Revision 0
6. "STARDOSE Model Report", Polestar Applied Technology, Inc., PSAT Cl 09.03 January1997.
7. PSAT 3019CF.QA.03, "Design Database for Application of the Revised DBA SourceTerm to Vermont Yankee", Revision 2.
8. S. L. Humphries et al, "RADTRAD: A Simplified Model for Radionuclide Transport andRemoval and Dose Estimation", NUREG/CR-6604, Sandia National Laboratories,December 1997
9. Memorandum to File from James Metcalf "Generalization of Spreadsheet Methodologyfor Comparing TID-14844 and AST Gamma Shine Dose Potential", July 27, 2003
10. MicroShield Version 5.03, 1995-1998,pGrove Engineering
Design Inputs
Design Input Data (Reference 7 for all inputs except those taken from Reference 5, Item numbersgiven in parentheses):
Power level = 1950 MWtCore inventories - see Reference 7 tableAST Release rates:Fraction of core inventory, 0- 120 seconds:
No Release
(Item 8.1)(Item 1.1 - full core inventory at t = 0)
(Item 2.1)
Fraction of coi
Fraction of col
re inventory, 120 - 1920 seconds:Gases Xe, Kr - 0.1/hr (0.05 total)
Elemental I - 4.9E-3/hr (2.4E-3 total)Organic I- 1.5E-4/hr (7.5E-5 total)
Aerosols I, Br - 0.095/hr (0.0475 total)Cs, Rb - 0.1I/hr (0.05 total)
re inventory, 1920 - 7320 seconds:Gases Xe, Kr - 0.63/hr (0.95 total)
Elemental I - 8.1E-3/hr (1.2E-2 total)Organic I - 2.5E-4/hr (3.8E-4 total)
Aerosols I, Br - 0.158/hr (0.2375 total)Cs, Rb - 0.133/hr (0.2 total)Te Group - 0.033/hr (0.05 total)Ba, Sr - 0.013/hr (0.02 total)Noble Metals - 1.7E-3/hr (2.5E-3 total)
(Item 2.2)
(Item 2.3)
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 5 of 25Rev I
La Group - 1.3E-4/hr (2E-4 total)Ce Group - 3.3E-4/hr (5EA4 total)
Volume of Drywell - 131,470 ft3 (max), 128,370 ft3 (min)Volume of Torus Airspace - 103,932 ft3 (min)Volume of Suppression Pool - 68,000 ft3 (min), 70,000 ft3 (max)Volume of Main Condenser (MC) - 107,000 ft3
Reactor Building Volume (for TSC shine caic) - 1,786,049 ft3Fraction of Reactor Building Volume above Refueling Floor - 0.33*
(Item 3.1)(Item 3.2)(Item 3.3)(Item 3.5)(Item 3.19)(Item 3.20)
*584,406 ft3/1,786,049 ft
Volumetric Leak Rate from Drywell (not including MSIVs) - 0.713 cfm (Item 3.6)This represents 0.8% of the minimum DW volume per day (Item 3.1).
Volumetric Leak Rate from Torus Airspace - 0.577 cfm (Item 3.7)This represents 0.8% of the torus airspace volume per day (Item 3.2).
Volumetric Flowrates for MSIV and Nitrogen Supply Bypass:From Drywell, for Each of Two Main Steam Lines - 0.383 cfmFrom Main Steam Lines, Combined Flow to Main Condenser - 3.91 cfmFrom Main Steam Lines, Combined Bypass Flow - 0.032 cfmFrom Main Condenser, to Environment - 2.05 cfmNitrogen Steam Supply Bypass - 0.031 cfm (Reference 5)
Reduction in Containment Leakage at 24 Hours -50% (Reference 5)
ESF Leakage - 0.5 gpm analyzed as 1.0 gpm, assumed to start at t = 0Release Fraction of Radioiodine from ESF leakage - 10%
(Item 3.10)(Item 4.3)
Lengths and Diameters of Nitrogen Supply Bypass Pathway- (Item 7.13)4.67 ft (18") + 16 ft (1" horizontal coil) + 16.42 ft (1") + 22.75 R (2')
Particulate Deposition Velocity in Nitrogen Supply Bypass Pathway = 5E-5 m/s (Reference 5)
Secondary Containment Drawdown Time, 0 minutes with all SGTS (Item 8.11)10 minutes with one SGTS train failed**
*During the 10 minutes, the Reactor Building pressure is actually negative for at least four minutes (the ReactorBuilding begins at a negative pressure). Positive pressure will not occur beyond t = 10 minutes (accident time).
Drywell Spray Removal, t = 0.25 hours to t = 2.0667 hoursA for particulate and elemental = 20 per hour (Reference 5)
Drywell Spray Removal, t = 2.0667 hours to t = 720 hoursX for particulate and elemental = 2 per hour (Reference 5)
Nominal SGTS Single-Train Flow (with +/- 150 cfm) - 1500 cfm (Item 3.14)Filter Efficiency- SGTS (Item 4.2)
For Particulate Iodine, Cesium and other Aerosols - 95%For Elemental and Organic Iodine - 95% (no credit for charcoal filtration)For Noble Gases - 0%
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09
Main Steam Line Removal Efficiencies (from Reference 5)
Pg 6 of 25Rev I
Aerosol Removal Efficiency Elem Iodine Removal EfficiencSteam Lines*, 62 scfhfLine 38% Assumed NegligibleSame, One MSIV Failed 0% 0%ALT Volume** 71% 58%Same, One MSIV Failed Assumed No Change Assumed No ChangeCombined SL and ALT 82% 58%Same, One MSIV Failed 77% Assumed No ChangeMain Condenser 95.1% 99.8%
*Betaeon MSIVs**Remainder of steam lines up to turbine stop valves
Volume of Control Room (CR) - 41,533.75 ft3 (Item 3.4)Volumetric Flowrate, Environment to CR (Pre-isolation Fresh Air Intake, Unfiltered) - 3700 cfin
Environment to CR (Post-Isolation, Unfiltered) - 3700 cfm (Items 3.8/3.18)Time to Isolate CR Ventilation for DBA-LOCA - N/As (Item 9.3)
"Transition to isolated condition not credited
Location of TSC Dose Pointe: Elevation = 260.5' + 3' (6' person) = 263.5' (Item 10.1)Elevation of TSC Overhead Shield = 272.5'Distance from Reactor Building Centerline = 115' West
= 112' North"maximum value identified as "Location 3" in reference calculation
Thickness of TSC Overhead (assumed to be -150 lbm/ft3 concreted##) - 8" (Item 10.2)""2.35 glcc
X/Q values in sec/m3:Building 0-2 hr 0-1 hr 1-2 hr 2-8 hr 8-24 hr 1-4 day 4-30 dayReleasesEAB ground 1.7 E-3 for TB --- --- N/A N/A N/A N/A(Item 5.1) 1.476E-3 for RBEAB stack Fumigation: N/A N/A N/A N/A(Item 5.1) 2.03E-4 (0.5 hr)
Normal:1.54E-4 (0.5 hr)9.17E-5 (1.0 hr)
LPZ ground -- 2.74E-5 1.75E-5 8.01E-6 1.00E-6 5.80E-7 3.37E-7(Item 5.2) TBtRB4 TB tRB I TBtRB& TB tRB X TB tRB I TB tRB I
5.253E-5 5.253E-5 2.227E-5 1.469E-5 5.948E-6 1.625E-6LPZ stack --- 2.55E-5 1.87E-5 l.O1E-5 1.09E-6 6.90E-7 4.61E-7(Item 5.2)Control --- 4.66E-3 4.66E-3 3.46E-3 1.45E-3 1.09E-3 9.92E-4Room ground TB tRB 4 TB tRB 4 TB tRB I TB tRB 4 TBtRB4 TBtRB4(Item 5.3) 2.25E-3* 2.25E-3 8.18E-4 3.53E-4 2.77E-4 2.23E-4
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 7 of 25Rev I
Control Fumigation: --- --- 8.28E-7 3.36E-7 3.08E-7 1.79E-7Room stack 1.92E-5 (0.5 hr)(Item 5.3) Normal:
1.92E-5 (0.5 hr)1.92E-5 (1.0 hr) __
*This is for the N2 system sustained bypass. For short-term drawdown bypass, use 2.98E-3
Control Room breathing rates in m3/s (Item 5.4):0-30 days 3.5E-4
EAB & LPZ breathing rates in m3/s (Item 5.4):0-8 hr 3.5E-414 days 1.8E-44-30 days 2.3E-4
Control Room occupancy factors (Item 5.5):0 - 24 hours 1.01-4 days 0.64-30 days 0.4
Dose Conversion Factors: Default FGR1 1&12.INP file from Reference 8
Calculation
Section I -Impact ofJAST on Equipment Qualification
1. Regulatory Guide 1.183 (Reference 1) states the following (Section 1.3.5):
"Current environmental qualification (EQ) analyses may be impacted by a proposed plantmodification associated with AST implementation. The EQ analyses that have assumptionsor inputs affected by the plant modification should be updated to address these impacts. TheNRC staff is assessing the effect of an increased cesium release on EQ doses to determinewhether licensee action is warranted. Until such time as this generic issue is resolved,licensees may use either the AST or the TID 14844 assumptions for performing the requiredEQ analyses. However, no plant modifications are required to address the impact of thedifference in source term characteristics (i.e., AST vs TID14844) on EQ doses pending theoutcome of the evaluation of the generic issue. The EQ dose estimates should be calculatedusing the design basis survivability period."
2. The generic issue (or more accurately, the candidate generic issue) was closed out on April30, 2001 (ten months after the issuance of Regulatory Guide 1. 183) with the issuance of amemorandum from Jack Rosenthal (Safety Margins and Systems Analysis Branch Chief) toAshok Thadani, Director of NRR (ADAMS Accession No. MLO 12103480). Thismemorandum states the following:
"The panel has decided that the candidate generic issue should be dropped as having nosignificant chance of meeting the incremental risk thresholds for backfit as described in theMD 6.4 Handbook."
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 8 of 25Rev I
It is important to note, of course, that backfit criteria would not necessarily be applied inaccepting or denying a voluntary licensing action. However, in this regard, one must notethat the NRC, itself, tied the EQ requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.183 (by definition, adocument dealing with voluntary licensing actions) to the outcome of the subject genericissue evaluation. Therefore, it is proper to consider the findings and conclusions of thegeneric issue evaluation as a way of clarifying the EQ requirements of this regulatory guide.
The generic issue evaluation further states the following:
"Sandia National Laboratories' letter report "Evaluation of Radiological Consequences ofDesign Basis Accidents at Operating Reactors Using the Revised Source Term, September28, 1998 showed that, for equipment exposed to the containment atmosphere, the TID-14844source term and the gap and in-vessel releases in the AST produce similar integrated doses.This report also showed that, for equipment exposed to sump water, the integrated dosescalculated with the AST exceeded those calculated with TID-14844 after 42 days for apressurized-water reactor (PWR) and 145 days for a boiling-water reactor (BWR) because ofthe 30% vs. 1% release of cesium."
With this finding in mind, the two key conclusions of this generic issue evaluation were (1)the determination that use of the AST is not a matter of compliance (IOCFR50.49 is silent onthe exact source term to be used, and Regulatory Guide 1.89 actually specifies TID-1 4844)and (2) it is not a matter of safety significance. In connection with this last point, the onlyissue even mentioned regarding safety significance is decay heat removal for PWRs (with the42-day change in the bounding sump water source term). BWRs (and the 145-day change inthe bounding sump water, or more exactly, suppression pool, source term) are not mentioned.
3. Polestar's view is that the long-term impact of cesium, particularly for a BWR, is a notsignificant and concurs with the position expressed in the NRC memorandum.
Section 2-Impact ofASTon VitalArea Access
To determine the accessibility of areas in the plant where post-accident actions must be taken,one must consider both the radiation levels and the airborne contamination levels in those areas.This, in combination with the duration of the post-accident operation being evaluated, determinesthe accessibility of the area.
[1
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg9of25
Rev I[I
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 10 of 25
Rev I
II
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 11 of 25
Rev I
1]
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 12 of 25
Rev 1If
II
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 13 of 25
Rev 1[CI
1]
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 14 of 25Rev 1
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 15 of 25
Rev I[1I
I I
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09Pg 16 of 25
Rev I
1I
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09Pg 17 of 25
Rev I
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09Pg 18 of 25
Rev I
i ]
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 19 of 25
Rev I
Ir
1]
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 20 of 25
Rev II r 0
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg21 of 25
Rev I
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 22 of 25Rev I
II
]]
Section 3 - Technical Support Center (TSC) Habitability
Continuous occupancy of the CR is covered in Reference 5. In Appendix B of Reference 5, aSTARDOSE model is presented which calculates the CR dose. The same ventilation system whichserves the CR also serves the TSC; and as with the CR, there is no filtration of the makeup airsupply. Therefore, the TSC dose from activity brought into the ventilation system will be the sameas that for the CR.
Where the assessment of TSC habitability differs from the assessment of CR habitability is in thearea of external radiation effects. The TSC is not heavily shielded in the same manner as the CR.Therefore, some conservatisms in the RB drawdown bypass modeling and in the nitrogen supplyRB bypass modeling that were included for the CR have been relaxed for the TSC. Therefore, thissection has two parts: (1) a recalculation of the CR/TSC doses from activity brought in through thecommon ventilation system using the STARDOSE model (but with some of the bypassconservatisms relaxed and including holdup within the RB for consistency with the TSC externalshine calculation), and (2) a recalculation of the TSC external shine using the RB activities as afunction of time developed in the previous section (Attachment 1).
The case analyzed is the limiting case for the CR dose from Reference 5; i.e., failure of one SGTStrain. This failure also maximizes the activity within the RB (as it was analyzed in the previoussection).
Dose from Activity Entering the CR/RSC Ventilation Supply for the DBA-LOCA
The bypass refinements are as follows:
* Credit is taken for the fact that during the nominal 10-minute drawdown time, the RB isactually at a positive pressure for only six minutes (see Design Input). The six minutes ofpositive pressure are assumed to be at the end of the 10-minute period.
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 23 of 25Rev 1
* Credit is taken for particulate deposition in a portion of the nitrogen supply leakage pathwayleading from the PC to the south wall of the RB. This credit makes use of the same modelingas that used for the MSIVs.
To make this latter calculation, the nitrogen supply bypass pathway data from the Design Inputsection is used. A summary of the nitrogen supply bypass particulate removal calculation is asfollows:
Bypass Particulate Removal EfficiencyReference bypass leakage volumetric flow =N2 bypass temp = 70 F, DW temp and p =
Total volumetric N2 line flow from DW = 0.03'Bypass Line Segment #: 1D = 18 inches,A= 1.77 ft2Length = 4.67 feet for settling, V = 8.2'Residence time = 99 min = 1.6'Settling velocity = 5.00E-05 m/s, lambda =Eff = 45%Bypass Line Segment #: 2D = 1 inches, A= 0.01 ft2Length 16 feet for settling, V = 0.0'Residence time = 1 min = 0.0:Settling velocity = 5.00E-05 m/s, lambda =Eff= 14%Bypass Line Segment #: 3D = I inches, A= 0.01 ft2Length 16.42 feet for settling, V = o.o0Residence time = I min = 0.0,Settling velocity = 5.OOE-05 m/s, lambda =Eff = 14%Bypass Line Segment #: 4D = 2 inches, A= 0.02 ft2Length 22.75 feet for settling, V = 0.5(Residence time = 6 min = 0.11Settling velocity = 5.OOE-05 m/s, lambda =Eff= 31%Net Eff 72%
5 scfh32844
1 cfm
5 ft35 hours
0.50
1 ft32 hours
9.02
1 1132 hours
9.02
3 t31 hours
4.51
F andpsig
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
The STARDOSE results for this case are as follows:
Total dose:Noble gasOrg iodineElem iodinePart iodineCesiumTelluriumBariumNoble metal
thyroid4.76E+001O.OOE+0001.59E+0012.12E+0002. 88E+0015.72E-0011. 90E-0013.97E-0042.50E-004
wbody6.0OBE-0025.70E-0021.69E-0042 .28E-0043.17E-0032 .36E-0042 .37E-0063 .16E-0050.OOE+000
skin2.43E+0002.38E+0002.76E-0032.77E-0033. 86E-0020. OOE+000O.OOE+000O.OOE+0000.OOE+000
CEDE2.22E+000o.OOE+0004.86E-0016.67E-0029.09E-0016.39E-0019.30E-003l.59E-0031.49E-002
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 24 of 25Rev I
Lanthanides 2.98E-005 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 .3.O1E-002Cerium 1.40E-005 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 5.02E-002Strontinum 8.33E-004 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 1.04E-002
The 30-day post-DBA-LOCA dose contribution from activity entering the TSC is 2.3 rem TEDE.
TSC Shine Calculation
The updated TSC shine calculation has been done with MicroShield MS5 (Reference 10). Thelimiting TSC dose point is identified in the Design Input section.
The modeling was developed using preliminary information (i.e., preliminary values for the RBactivities as a function of time, building volume, dose point location, etc.). The development of thepreliminary modeling is documented in a memo to file included as Attachment 2. The preliminaryvalues for RB activities (analogous to Attachment 1 to this calculation) are included as anattachment to that memo to file. The use of MicroShield in the manner described in Attachment 2has been independently verified in two ways. Not including the effects of skyshine wasindependently verified in a second memo to file (Attachment 3), and the use of MicroShieldcylindrical geometry with a vertical annulus shield was independently verified using QADMOD-GP in a third memo to file (Attachment 4). While this work was conducted using preliminaryinformation, the final inputs were very close to (and qualitatively the same as) the preliminaryinformation used to qualify the approach. Therefore, verification of the final MicroShield analysisconsisted of verifying that inputs from Attachment 1 and the Design Input section of thiscalculation were used.
The integrated 30-day shine dose for the TSC consists of two parts: the MicroShield analysiscontribution of shine from activity within the RB and a contribution from the external cloud. Fromthe Design Input section, the contribution from the external cloud is determined to be 15 times thewhole body dose from sources internal to the TSC which is 15 x 0.062 rem or 0.93 rem. Theintegrated 30-day contribution from the MicroShield analysis (for the worst dose point identified inthe Design Input section) is 0.27 rem. The total 30-day external shine dose is, therefore, 0.93 rem +0.27 rem = 1.2 rem.
TSC Total 30-day Habitability Dose
The combined dose including the contribution from activity entering the TSC and from externalshine is 3.5 rem TEDE. This is within the 5 rem TEDE limit for the TSC.
Results
Section 1 - Impact ofAST on Equipment Qualification
No change is required in the basis for equipment qualification. Continued use of the TID-14844source term as the basis for EQ is validated by the NRC generic dispositioning of the question ofAST cesium impact on EQ programs. This is discussed further in the calculation section on thistopic.
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09 Pg 25 of 25Rev I
Section 2 -Impact ofASTon Vital Area Access
* For doses from waterborne sources, TID-14844 will control dose rates for at least the first.day and (with shielding considered) perhaps longer. The areas affected by waterborne souceswill be controlled by access within the first day-, and therefore, the TID-14844 dose rates willbe greater than those of the AST.
* For doses from airborne sources (which are typically more controlling than waterbornesources in any case), the airborne dose rates will always be controlled by TID-14844 giventhat release pathways from the PC and/or the RB remain the same.
• For both waterborne and airborne cases, any increase in power level and/or burnup affectingthe core inventory would need to be taken into account. However, the TID-14844 sourceterm can remain as the basis.
Section 3 - Technical Support Center (TSC) Habitability
The 30-day dose for an occupant of the TSC (assuming the same occupancy as the CR) is 3.5rem.TEDE.
Conclusions
The TID-14844 source term is generally more limiting than the AST. For EQ, a genericNRC/Sandia evaluation of the EQ implications of the AST (and the associated additional cesiumrelease) concludes that the TID-14844 source term can continue to be used as the EQ basis. Forvital area access, the TID-14844 source term produces more limiting dose rates than does the AST.For the TSC, the 30-day habitability dose for the DBA-LOCA is less than the 5 rem TEDE limit.
PSAT 3019CF.QA.08 Attachment 1 Pg I of 3Rev 0
RB Activities vs. Time for TSC Shine Calculation
Hours:
Kr83m
KrBSm
KrBS
Kr8 7
IKr88
Kr89
Xe13lm
XeI33m
Xe133
Xe13Sm
Xel3S
XeI37
Xel38
1l310rg
11320rg
11330rg
1134 Org
113 SOrg
I13121em
1132Elem
I133Elem
1134E1em
1l3SElem
1132.Part
Il32Part
1133Part
I2.34Part
113SPart
Rb86
Cs134
Cs136
Cs137
1. 97E+02
5.59E+02
3.41E+01
7.57E+02
1.4 SE+03
4.93E-03
2.14E+01
1.17E+02
3.88E+03
5.36E+01
1.52E+03
8.06E-02
2.95E+02
1. 53E+00
1.62E+00
3. 01E+00
l.SSE+00
2.61E+00
8. 94E+00
1.07E+01
1.762+01
9.06E+00
1. 53E+01
1.75E+02
1.85E+02
3.45E+02
1.78E+02
3.00E+02
6.18E-01
7.3SE+01
1. 88E+0.
2.94E+0l
2
9.76E+02
3.44E+03
2.46E+02
3.16E+03
8.15E+03
7.51E-08
1.54E+02
8.35E+02
2.79E+04
2.69E+01
1.02E+04
1.37E-OS
1.84E+02
7.37E+00
5.81E+00
1.41E+01
3.36E+00
1.14E+01
2.22E+01
2.87E+01
4.24E+01
1.01E+01
3.43E+01
4.34E+02
3.42E+02
8.31E+02
1.98E+02
6.73E+02
1.13E+00
1.34E+02
3.43E+01
5.38E+01
4
1. 60E+03
8.70E+03
8.51E+02
3.66E+03
1.72E+04
1.16E-18
S.31E+02
2.82E+03
9.56E+04
4.53E-01
3.21E+04
2.63E-14
4.76E+00
2.29E+01
1. 01E+01
4.14E+01
2.12E+00
2.92E+01
4.17E+0l
5.75E+01
7.52E+01
3.84E+00
5.30E+01
8.16E+02
3.58E+02
1.47E+03
7.53E+01
1.04E+03
1.33E+00
1. 59E+02
4.04E+02
6.36E+01
8
8.01E+02
1.04E+04
1.91E+03
9.2 0E+02
1.43 E+04
5.28E-41
1.18E+03
6.01E+03
2.10E+05
2.39E-05
5.94E+04
1.84E-32
5.96E-04
4.95E+0l
6.69E+00
7.94E+01
1.87E-0l
4.23E+01
6.79E+01
6.33E+01
1.09E+02
2.55E-01
5.78E+01
1.33E+03
1.79E+02
2.13E+03
5.00E+00
1.13E+03
1.14E+00
1.37E+02
3.4 5E201
5.47E+01
16
7.40E+0l
5.40E+03
3.52E+03
2.13E+01
3.642+03
3.96E-86
2.13E+03
1.OOE+04
3.75E+05
2.45E-14
7.21E+04
3.26E-69
3.44E-12
8. 80E+01
1.13E+00
1. 11E+02
S.SSE-04
3.39E+01
1. OSE+02
4.21E+01
1.32E+02
6.60E-04
4.03E+01
2.05E+03
2.63E+01
2.59E+03
1.29E-02
7.90E+02
7.82E-01
9.51E+01
2.36E+01
3.81E+01
24
4.87E+00
2.01E+03
4.63E+03
3.52E-01
6. 62E+02
2.75E+03
1.19E+04
4.76E+05
1.79E-23
6.02E+04
1.41E-20
1. 12E+02
1.37E-01
1.12E+02
1.18E-06
1.96E+0l
1.28E+02
2.69E+01
1.28E+02
1.35E-06
2.23E+0l
2.S0E+03
3.06E+00
2.50E+03
2.64E-05
4.36E+02
5.37E-01
6.61E+01
1.61E+01
2.65E+01
48
5.18E-04
3.84E+01
3.94E+03
5.93E-07
1.47E+00
2.21E+03
7.51E+03
3.62E+05
2.60E-S1
1. 19E+04
3.67E-46
8.92E+01
9.36E-OS
4.37E+01
4.40E-IS
1.43E+00
1.53E+02
7.27E+00
7.52E+0l
7.56E-1S
2.46E+00
3.00E+03
3.15E-03
1.47E+03
1.48E-13
4.82E+01
1.74E-01
2.22E+01
5.142+00
8.91E+00
72
6.09E-08
8.12E-01
3.69E+03
1.10E-12
3.62E-03
1.96E+03
5.21E+03
3.04E+OS
4.17E-79
2.31E+03
1. 05E-71
7.73E+01
6.98E-08
1.86E+01
1.78E-23
1.14E-01
1.52E+02
1. 97E+00
3.65E+01
3.49E-23
2.24E-02
2.97S+03
2.68S-06
7.162+02
6.84E-22
4.39E+00
5.65E-02
7.49E+00
1.64E+00
3.00E+00
96
7.43E-12
1.78E-02
3.60E+03
2.13E-18
9.26E-06
1.8 0E+03
3.76E+03
2.63E+OS
120
9.20E-16
3.98E-04
3.56E+03
4.16E-24
2.40E-08
1.68E+03
2.75E+03
2.29E+o5
240
2.77E-35
2.25E-12
3.47E+03
1.23E-52
2.90E-21
1.23E+03
5. 95E+02
1.17E+05
720
2.36E-45
3.19E+03
6.25E-73
3.58E+02
1. 32E+00
7.83E+03
4.20E+02 7.29E+01 9.14E-03 1.76E-18
3.12E-97
6.94E+0l
5.38E-1l
8.22E+00
7.48E-32
9.44E-03
1.42E+02
5.34E-01
1.68E+0l
1.53E-31
1.93E-02
2.79E+03
2.16E-09
3.30E+02
3.OOE-30
3.79E-001
1.83E-02
2.52E+00
5.24E-01
1. 01E+00
6.30E+01
4.20E-14
3.67E+00
3.18E-40
7.90E-04
1.31E+02
1.45E-01
7.64E+00
6.61E-40
1.64E-03
2.57E+03
1.71E-12
1. SOE502
1.29E-38
3.22E-02
5.95E-03
8.47E-01
1.67E-01
3.40E-01
4.01E+01
1.25E-29
6.68E-02
4.51E-82
3.32E-09
8.45E+02
2.12E-04
1.41E-01
9.50E-82
7.01E-09
1. 66E+03
5.17E-28
2.76E+00
1.86E-80
1.37E-07
2.14E-OS
3.65E-03
5.55E-04
1.47E-03
6.63E+00
1.OOE-91
7.44E-09
1.06E-30
1. 43E+0l
9.74E-16
1.61E-08
6.41E-28
2.80E+02
2.47E-56
3.15E-07
4.47E-29
3.59E-1S
1.26E-12
6.74E-14
5.17E-13
PSAT 3019CF.QA.08 Attachment 1 Pg 2 of 3Rev 0
Sbl27 1.62E+00 5.35E+00 6.93E+00 5.842+00 3.83E+00 2.S5E+00 7.07E-01 1.99E-01 5.60E-02 1.58E-02 2.79E-OS 2.75E-16
Sbl29 3.81E+00 1.08E+01 1.03E+01 4.75E+00 9.26E-01 1.80E-01 1.33E-03 9.86E-06 7.29E-08 5.39E-10 1.19E-20 1.95E-49
Tel27m 2.20E-01 7.32E-01 9.63E-01 8.35S-01 5.80E-01 4.02E-01 1.35E-01 4.50E-02 1.SlE-02 5.04E-03 2.11E-OS 6.54E-1S
Tel27 1.54E+00 4.94E+00 6.47E+00 5.69E+00 3.95E+00 2.67E+00 7.79E-01 2.21E-01 6.23E-02 1.75E-02 3.11E-05 3.06E-16
Tel29m 6.55E-01 2.17E+00 2.85E+00 2.47E+00 1.71E+00 1.18E+00 3.89E-01 1.28E-01 4.24E-02 1.40E-02 5.47E-OS 1.28E-14
Tel29 3.03E+00 8.54E+00 1.12E+01 6.31E+00 1.29E+00 2.51E-01 1.86E-03 1.37E-05 1.0lE-07 7.50E-10 1.65E-20 2.71E-49
Tel31m 1.86E+00 6.05E+00 7.60E+00 6.02E+00 3.48E+00 2.01E+00 3.89E-01 7.53E-02 1.46E-02 2.82E-03 7.61E-07 4.07E-21
Tel32 1.74E+01 5.74E+01 7.41E+01 6.20E+01 4.02E+01 2.60E+01 7.05E+00 1.91E+00 5.18E-01 1.40E-01 2.06E-04 9.45E-16
Bal37m 2.85E+01 5.29E+01 6.36E+01 5.47E+01 3.81E+01 2.65E+01 8.91E+00 3.00E+00 1.OE+00 3.40E-01 1.47E-03 5.17E-13
Ba139 5.79E+00 1.17E+01 5.64E+00 6.61E-01 8.40E-03 1.07E-04 2.19E-10 4.48E-16 9.19E-22 1.88E-27 6.80E-56 1.32E-90
Ba140 9.17E+00 3.04E+01 3.98E+01 3.42E+01 2.34E+01 1.60E+01 5.10E+00 1.63E+00 5.19E-01 1.66E-01 5.47E-04 6.51E-14
Mo99 1.18E+00 3.87E+00 4.98E+00 4.15E+00 2.66E+00 1.70E+00 4.47E-01 1.18E-01 3.09E-02 8.12E-03 1.02E-OS 2.51E-17
Tc99m 9.61E-01 3.06E+00 4.14E+00 3.82E+00 2.72E+00 1.81E+00 4.91E-01 1.29E-01 3.40E-02 8.92E-03 1.12E-OS 2.76E-17
Rui03 1.14E+00 3.77E+00 4.95E+00 4.282+00 2.97E+00 2.05E+00 6.79E-01 2.25E-01 7.43E-02 2.46E-02 9.75E-05 2.42E-14
Ru10S 7.74E-01 2.21E+00 2.14E+00 1.01E+00 2.09E-01 4.32E-02 3.79E-04 3.33E-06 2.93E-08 2.57E-10 1.35E-20 1.06E-61
Ru106 6.39E-01 2.12E+00 2.79E+00 2.42S+00 1.68E+00 1.17E+00 3.94E-01 1.32E-01 4.45E-02 1.49E-02 6.41E-OS 2.17E-14
RhiOS 8.13E-01 2.67E+00 3.46E+00 2.88E+00 1.77E+00 1.07E+00 2.27E-01 4.80E-02 1.01E-02 2.14E-03 8.98E-07 2.80E-20
Y90 9.41E-03 4.39E-02 1.17E-01 2.14E-01 2.96E-01 3.00E-01 1.81E-01 8.18E-02 3.29E-02 1.25E-02 6.91E-OS 2.63E-14
Y91 7.49E-02 2.54E-01 3.58E-01 3.49E-01 2.77E-01 2.06E-01 7.34E-02 2.47E-02 8.24B-03 2.74E-03 1.12E-OS 3.10E-1S
Y92 3.81E-01 2.60E+00 6.88E+00 6.14E+00 l.S9E+00 2.94E-01 1.18E-03 4.03E-06 1.34E-08 4.45E-11 1.77E-23 2.10E-54
Y93 8.22E-02 2.55E-01 2.92E-01 1.93E-01 7.74E-02 3.11E-02 2.01E-03 1.30E-04 8.40E-06 5.43E-07 6.13E-13 4.97E-35
Zr9S 8.63E-02 2.87E-01 3.77E-01 3.26E-01 2.26E-01 1.57E-01 S.23E-02 1.74E-02 5.80E-03 1.93E-03 7.91E-06 2.24E-15
Zr97 8.24E-02 2.63E-01 3.19E-01 2.35E-01 1.18E-01 5.94E-02 7.53E-03 9.56E-04 1.21E-04 1.54E-0S 5.05E-10 5.87E-28
Nb9S 8.65E-02 2.87E-01 3.78E-01 3.28E-01 2.28E-01 1.59E-01 5.34E-02 1.80E-02 6.05E-03 2.04E-03 8.75E-06 2.88E-1S
Lal40 1.29E-01 6.78E-01 2.06E+00 3.942+00 5.42E+00 5.36E+00 2.96E+00 1.22E+00 4.53E-01 1.58E-01 6.12E-04 7.50E-14
Lal4l 7.17E-02 1.99E-01 1.84E-01 7.83E-02 1.31E-02 2.20E-03 1.04E-OS 4.90E-08 2.31E-10 1.09E-12 2.55E-24 1.38E-67
Lal42 5.33E-02 1.13E-01 5.97E-02 8.45E-03 1.56E-04 2.88E-06 1.82E-11 1.1SE-16 7.21E-22 4.55E-27 4.51E-53 4.15E-89
Prl43 8.21E-02 2.73E-01 3.61E-01 3.162-01 2.24E-01 1.57E-01 5.32E-02 1.76E-02 5.76E-03 1.87E-03 6.40E-06 8.20E-16
Nd147 3.34E-02 1.11E-01 1.45E-01 1.24E-01 8.49E-02 5.79E-02 1.83E-02 5.80E-03 1.84E-03 5.82E-04 1.85E-06 1.92E-16
Am241 1.52E-05 5.06E-05 6.65E-05 5.78E-05 4.02E-05 2.80E-05 9.42E-06 3.17E-06 1.07E-06 3.60E-07 1.56E-09 5.52E-19
Cm242 5.96E-03 1.98E-02 2.61E-02 2.26E-02 1.57E-02 1.09E-02 3.66E-03 1.23E-03 4.11E-04 1.38E-04 5.85E-07 1.89E-16
Cm244 2.11E-03 7.01E-03 9.22E-03 8.01E-03 5.57E-03 3.88E-03 1.31E-03 4.40E-04 1.48E-04 4.98E-05 2.16E-07 7.57E-17
Cel4l 2.10E-01 6.98E-01 9.16E-01 7.93E-01 5.48E-01 3.79E-01 1.25E-01 4.11E-02 1.35E-02 4.46E-03 1.73E-OS 3.97E-1S
Ce143 2.05E-01 6.66E-01 8.39E-01 6.68E-01 3.91E-01 2.29E-01 4.57E-02 9.14E-03 1.83E-03 3.66E-04 1.17E-07 1.23E-21
Cel44 1.65E-01 5.49E-01 7.21E-01 6.26E-01 4.3SE-01 3.03E-01 1.02E-01 3.42E-02 1.15E-02 3.8SE-03 1.65E-OS S.SSE-15
Np239 3.35E+00 1.10E+01 1.41E+01 1.17E+01 7.36E+00 4.64E+00 1.16E+00 2.90E-01 7.26E-02 1.82E-02 1.782-OS 1.64E-17
PSAT 3019CF.QA.08 Attachment 1 Pg3 of 3Rev 0
PU238PU239
PU24 0
PU241
SrS 9
Sr9O
Sr9l
Sr92
1.74E-03
G.51K-Os
1.38BE-04
2.91E-02
G.15E+00
7.32E-01.
7.39E+00
6 .33E+00
5.78E-03
2 .16E-04
4.SaE-04
9.67E-02
2.04E.01.
2.43E+00
2.28E.01.
1.62E+01
7.60E-03
2.*84E-04
6.02E-04
1.27E-01
2.68E+01
3.20E+00
2.60E.O1
1.26EE.01
2.47E-04
5.22E-04
1.10K-Ol
2.32E.01
2.78E+00
1.69E+01
3.82E.00
4.60E-03
1.72E-04
3.64E-04
7.68E-02
1.61E+01
1. 93E.00
G.S9E+00
3.26E-01
3.20E-03
1.20E-04
2.53E-04
S.34E-02
1. 12E+01
1:34E.OO
2.S7E+00
2.1SE-02
1.08E-03
4.03E-05
8.52E-OS
1.80E-02
3.71E+00
4.53E-01
1.52E-01
1.72E-05
3.62E-04
1.36E-05
2.87E-OS
6.06E-03
1.23E+00
1.52E-01
9.04E-03
1.07E-08
1.22E-04
4.57E-06
9.66E-06
2.04E-03
4.09E-01
5.13E-02
5.36E-04
6.60E-12
4.11E-O5
1.54E-06
3.25E-06
6.87E-04
1.36E-01
1.73E-02
3.18E-OS
4.09E-15
1.78E-07
6.66E-09
1.41Z-08
2.97E-06
5.49E-04
7.48E-05
2.33E-11
3.72E-31
6.26E-17
2.37E-18
4.98E-18
1.04E-15
1.47E-13
2.63E-14
7.79E-36
6.86E-70
Memo to files Attachment 2 05/09/03From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
This memo describes the calculation of the integrated dose in the Technical Support Center(TSC) following a LOCA release to the Reactor Building (RB). The RB fission productactivities as functions of time were supplied by Jim Metcalf and are shown in Attachment 1.
Dose rates as functions of time were calculated with MicroShield MS5. Following a suggestionby Jim Metcalf, an equivalent cylindrical geometry was employed. Figure I shows theequivalent cylindrical geometry in plan view. Figure 2 shows the geometry used in the MS5calculations. Note that the estimated dose point location in Figure 1 (intended to represent"location 3" in the current VY TSC shine calculation) is 158' from the center of the assumedsource in plan view, whereas in Figure 2, it is 127.7' from the center of the assumed source inplan view. This point will be revisited in what follows.
The MS5 geometry parameters for the top cylinder were H = 42', R = 72', Shl = 1' (air, density =0.00 122 g/cm3), Sh2 = 54' (air), Sh3 = 0.667' (an 8" concrete shield placed vertically in themodel, but actually oriented horizontally, density= 2.33 glcm3), X = 127.7', Y = 121', Z = 0'.The buildup factor for the 54' air "shield" was used, since it gave the largest dose rates. No credithas been taken for the sheet-metal wall of the upper compartment. The vertical placement of theconcrete shield is a limitation of the code for this geometry and is discussed further below. Thevolume of the RB is actually based on a height of 139' since the dose point is approximately 18'above grade. However, this has no impact on the MS5 model geometry.
Shl represents a 'transition region" which MS5 requires because the source is cylindrical but theshields are rectangular. X represents the horizontal distance from the origin of the coordinatesystem, which is at the center of the top of the cylinder, to the dose point. It is equal to72'+1'+54'+0.667'+0.033'= 127.7'. 0.033' (1 cm) is the air gap at the dose point required byMS5.Y is the vertical distance from the origin to the dose point, equal to 42'+79' or 121'. The X axis istaken to be the horizontal line from the origin to the dose point, therefore Z = 0.
Since the center plane of the source volume is 100' above the dose point and the dose point is 128'from the centerline of the source volume, the angle of the ray from the center of the source volumeto the dose point is 38 degrees above the horizontal. This means that the distance through the 8"vertical shield is actually a little more than 10". However, the actual distance through the 8" shield(were it able to be horizontally placed in the model) would be 13", and the dose would be lowerthan that calculated in this analysis. Moreover, this model is conservative because it places the dosepoint closer to the source than actuallyneeded (128' to the center of the source rather than 158').As the distance from the source increases, not only would the Ir2 geometric effect decrease thedose, but air attenuation and a greater distance through the 8" shield would also decrease the dose.
It is interesting to note that given the vertical placement of the shield in the model, an oppositeeffect is observed for dose vs. distance up to a point. As the distance from the source increases, theangle of the ray above the horizontal becomes shallower, and the effectiveness of a vertical shielddecreases rather than increases. Eventually the sensitivity of the effective shielding thickness with
I
Memo to files Attachment 2 05/09/03From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
distance becomes small and geometric and air shielding effects become dominant, but for pointsnear the source, the dose vs. distance actually increases (artificially) because of the vertical shield.For a dose point less than about 100' from the source in plan view, the angle of the ray above thehorizontal becoming greater than 45 degrees; and this model would produce a non-conservativeresult using the vertical shield (i.e., the shielding effectiveness becomes overstated). But for anglesabove the horizontal less than 45 degrees, the model becomes increasingly conservative withdistance.
The dose vs. distance as calculated by the model is shown on Figure 3, both with and withoutbuild-up (build-up is included in the dose results below). For r < 141' (where "r" is the distancefrom the center of the source to the dose point), the results are no longer conservative. Beyond r =141 ' (and for a horizontal distance of 127.7', "r" is 162'), the dose becomes increasinglyconservative. In this model (as shown on the figure), the dose decreases roughly as /r3 (the h/r2
geometric effect plus air attenuation) beyond about r = 250'; but in actuality, it would be a muchgreater rate of decrease because of the shielding orientation.
To confirm that dose actually does vary as I/r2 near the source, the thickness of the shield wasvaried to maintain a constant distance for the ray passing through the shield as the horizontaldistance was varied from 100' to 300'. The results are shown on Figure 4, and there is goodagreement between the actual doses and the estimated doses based on a 1/r2 dependency. The Ihr2
dependency is mentioned in Appendix A in terms of quantifying the impact of the portions of theassumed cylindrical source that are actually shielded by the lower concrete walls of the reactorbuilding.
At each of the times up to 15 days that the source inventories were available, they were entered intothe MS5 source file for that time. The full RB inventories were used. At the end of the calculationthe dose obtained can be multiplied by the ratio of the free volume of the top compartment to thefree volume of the whole RB (i.e., the volume used in the STARDOSE run that produced thesource). A further correction to account for the portion of the upper compartment that is actually"seen" by the dose point is discussed below and in Appendix A.
The source inventory at 30 days was estimated by decaying the activities at 15 days by an additional15 days. The code RADDECAY was used for this calculation. The 30-day activities may beoverestimated since there is no removal by ventilation or purging flows included. However, the RBis in equilibrium with the containment by this point in time, so decay should effect both sources(containment) and sinks (RB exhaust flow) equally.
The integrated dose as a function of time was obtained from the dose rates by taking the linearaverage of the dose rate over a time interval, multiplying by the interval and summing. In thismanner the 30-day integrated dose was obtained as 6.62 rad, assuming a volume ratio of 42/139 =0.302 (same as the ratio of heights). An additional factor of 1.509 must be applied since the freevolume of the RB is 1.5E6 R', but the MS5 volume is 2.26E6 ft' (= x 721 x 139).
2
Merni to files Attachment 2 05/09/03From: R. SherComnments added by J1. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
A better way to average the dose rate is logarithmically (since the dose rate is diminishingapproximately exponentially over a given time interval). Averaging logarithmically gave anintegrated dose of about 6.1 rad. Figure 5 shows the integrated dose as a function of time, with bothtypes of averaging. Note how much of the dose is accumulated in the first day. Therefore, whileoccupancy factors have not been credited, factors of less than unity after the first day would nothave a significant effect.
These doses must be reduced further to account for the fact that the dose point "sees" only aportion of the source volume. In the original rectangular geometry, the fraction of the sourcevolume that contributes to the dose is about 0.2, so without any dependence on "r , the integrteddoses would be about 1.32 rad with linear averaging and about 1.22 rad with logarithmicaveraging.
To consider the impact of r-dependence, an assessment was done using the assumed cylindricalgeometry of the MS5 model. It was noted that the portion of the cylindrical model that can beseen above the concrete shielding of the lower RB would be the upper cylinder truncated by aconic section defined by the upper rim of the assumed cylindrical concrete shield. It wasdetermined (see Appendix A) that the fraction of cylindrical volume that could be "seen" by thedose point is 0.19, almost identical to that found for the original rectangular geometry. However,it was also determined that the volume averaged "r" for the "retained" volume was smaller thanthat for the upper cylinder as a whole (about 139' vs. 187', the latter corresponding to ahorizontal distance from the cylinder centerline to the dose point of 158'). Therefore, assuming al/r2 dose dependence, the "retained" volume would have about 1.8 times the impact of thecylindrical source as a whole on a per volume basis. This means the dose multiplier to relate thedose from the "retained" volume to that for the upper cylinder should be more like 0.34 ratherthan 0.19. This would yield a dose of about 2.2 rads for the linear averaging and 2.1 rads for thelogarithmic averaging. More detail on the calculation of the view factors is given in AppendixA.
Finally, it should be noted that the above results are only for direct shine from the RB and do notinclude skyshine. On the other hand, these results do not include consideration of occupancyfactor, either. Both of these would be small but not negligible effects. Taking both into account,it is anticipated that the shine contribution from the RB to the TSC can be shown to be less than2.5 rads over 30 days, with most of the dose occurring within the first 24 hours.
3
Memo to files Attachment 2From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
05/09/03
...... .. . . . . _l. . .I. . .. ....... .... .
I I% S
ISC Dose Point ]%-- .. I
I
Figure 1. Equivalent Cylinder.
Memo to files A ttaclhment 2From: R. SlierComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vennont Yankee TSC Integrted D)ose CnhulvatitOt
05/09/03
R=72 .
f nd
*3
Z4/
N t
79'
I
I
I
.IIIII
I
concrete shield, 0.667'
'dose point, X = 127.7', Y = 121'Z=O
/"transition region"
(air, I')air "shield", 54'
Figure 2. MS5 Geometry.
Memo to files Attachment 2From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
05/09/03
mrad/hr
0.0001 4-100 1000
reft
Figure 3. Dose vs. Distance.
6
Memo to files Attachment 2From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
05/09/03
a)140(a ___ _'
Xx -we-0a
E 12
100 150 200 250 300
Feet
Figure 4. Dose vs. Distance.
7
Memo to files Attachment 2From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
05/09/03
VYTSC integrated dose
7
6
5 "
4rad
3 l ..... -n-a* ave.
2 l b~~~~lg ave.2-
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time, days
I
Figure 5. Integrated Dose (rad).
8
Memo to files Attachtment 2 05/09/03From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
Appendix A - Calculation of the View Factor.
The figure shows the geometry that determines the view factor in rectangular geometry.
42'
dose point 112' 55'
The portion of the upper compartment that is seen from the dose point is the wedgewhose volume is (42 x 29.24 x 144)/2 = 88422 fl3. (29.24 = 42 x 55/79.) The total volume of theupper compartment is 42 x 112 x 144 = 677376 ft3.
Similarly, from the other face of the upper compartment, the portion of the upper volume that isseen from the dose point is the wedge whose volume is (42 x 21.27 x 112)/2 = 50027 3 . (21.27= 42 x 40/79; the offset in this direction is 40' rather than 55'.)
Thus the fraction of the upper compartment that is seen at the dose point is (88422 + 50027 - 0.5x Vk,,)/677376.
Via is the volume of the prism formed by the intersecting volumes of the two wedges and is equalto (29.24 x 21.27 x 42)/2 = 13061 ftW.
Finally, the view factor is (88422 + 50027 - 0.5 x 13061)/677376 = 0.2.
The view factor can also be determined by examining the cylindrical geometry. Looking fromthe dose point towards the cylinder representing the reactor building, the top rim of the concreteshielding surrounding the lower compartment casts an elliptical "shadow" on any imaginaryhorizontal plane above the rim of the concrete shielding. The leading edge of this "shadow" (i.e.,the point closest to the dose point) is set back a distance of about 1.1 feet from the surface of theupper compartment for each foot of height assuming the dose point is 158' from the centerline ofthe cylinder (and, therefore, 86' from the surface in the horizontal plane) and 79' below the rim
Memo to files Attachment 2From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
05/09/03
of the concrete shielding. At the top of the upper compartment (42' above the rim of theconcrete), the setback is about 46'.
Assuming the leading edge of the "shadow" can be treated as circular over the relatively smallarc of its intersection with the circle defined by the assumed cylindrical surface of the uppercompartment, the area of the "retained" volume (i.e., that outside the "shadow") for eachhorizontal slice through the cylindrical upper compartment is based on two intersecting circleswith the "shadow" always having a larger radius than the constant 72' radius of the uppercompartment. The angle subtended by the chord joining the intersection of these two circlesdecreases with elevation for the "shadow" circle (angle A, below) as its radius increases andincreases for the circle defined by the upper compartment cylinder (angle A', below). As one cansee, the chord joining the intersection becomes essentially the diameter of the upper compartmentcylinder at the top elevation of the upper compartment (angle A' equals 7t).
(ACCa
'U
80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 124
Feet Above Dose Point
The fraction of the circular area included in the "retained" volume at each elevation increasesfrom zero at 79' to 34% at 121 ' (the top of the upper compartment). The integrated volume is19% of the total upper compartment volume. This is essentially the same fraction as thatcalculated for the original rectangular geometry discussed previously.
An area-weighted average distance from the center of the "retained" area at each elevation to thedose point was calculated to be 139'. The distance from the center of the upper compartment tothe dose point is 187'. Therefore, if one assumes that dose impact varies as 1/r2, on a per volume
. ^
Memo to files Attachment 2 05/09/03From: R. SherComments added by J. MetcalfSubject: Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
basis, the "retained volume would have an impact (187/139)2 = 1.8 times greater than the uppercompartment taken as a whole.
11
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09Attachment 2
.Attachment 1 to R. Sher Memo of 5/9/03 (2 pages)
Hours 0 2 2 4 a 16 24 42 72 96 12 2I I6 192 216 240 264 222 312 336 3402&23 0.005+02 1.72E402 1.495402 1.37E'01 6.702402 5.39E401 3.735E-00 3.4tE-04 M.M20 4.iSE-12 6.01E-26 7.775-20 9.405-24 1. 16E-27 1.44E.31 1.79E-35 2.235-39 2.715.4) 3.465E47 4.31E51 5.35,5-3
9rISm 0.00E401 4.71 E+02 2.t9E403 7.205403 3.352403 4.15E403 1.49E+03 2425402 S. 12M-0 1.12E-02 2.505-0 5.59E-06 1.25E-07 2.205-09 6.27E-1I 1.40E-1 2 3.145-14 7.03E-16 21.58E-17 3.56E-19 7.945-21KrIS 0.00E4+01 3.14E4-01 2.255+02 7.7 15402 1.635403 2.965403 3.74E403 2.7#E+03 2.355503 2.43E+03 2.45E403 2.43E403 2.41 E403 2.4054-03 2.31E4-03 2.37E+03 1.35E403 2.34E+03 2.32E5+03 2.31E+03 2.29E4031(u7 0.005401 6.26E402 2.605403 2.985403 7.225.02 1.61E401 2.555-01 3.765-07 6.215-13 1.325-12 2.585-24 5.075-30 9.96536 1.965-41 3.155-47 7.51E-53 2.50F5-5 2.935464 5.765-70 1.14E-75 2.242-22KrHt 0.005402 1. 19E403 6 61E+03 1.39E4,04 2.23404 2.735403 4.765402 9.30E-01 2.235-3 5.625-06 2.475-0 3.835-22 9.97F-24 2.60E-16 7.275-219 .205-21I 4.64E-24 1.205-26 3.14E-29 8.16E-32 2.12E-342Crt9 0005E401 4 005-3 4.075-03 9.295-29 4.22541 2.945-26
XeI3Im 0.00E401 2.3754-01 2.705402 5.795402 1.255+03 2.165+03 2.67E403 1.225+03 1.625+03 2.495+03 2.395403 1.305+03 1.22E403 1.155403 2.0154-03 2.025+03 9.465E402 3225E+02 2.3354-02 7.1125+02 7.32E402XelJ3rn 0.00E401 2.255+02 2.14E402 2.72E403 5 632403 3.962403 2.02E+04 5.64E+03 3.12E403 2.755403 2.0254+03 1.425403 .0254-03 7.975+-02 5.265402 4.325 402 J.216E402 2.3354-02 1.7254-02 1.265+02 9.24E402
Xe233 0.005402 3.6254,03 2.635404 2.925404 2.925405 3.24E+05 3.955405 2.645405 2.265405 2.275405 2.63E4.05 1.42E4+05 1.245405 2.02+05 9.4354-04 2.225404 1165404 6.245404 5.44F404 4.745404 4.135404XcISm 0.005402I 3.34E+02 2.675402 4.435-02 2.23E-05 2.22F-24 1.565-23 2.99-52 3.125 -79
XeI33 0.005401 2M5E"3 9.7254-03 3.025404 5.4554-04 6.365404 5.14E404 9.245403 1,7554-03 3.235+-02 5 3754-01 9.0125-00 1.49E-00 2.465-01 4.035-02 6.605-3 L.025-03 1.775-4 2.295-05 4.12E-06 7.72E-07Xe237 0.005402 7.95E-02 1.35E-OS 2.55-24 1.73E-32 2.925469Xe232 0.005402 2.7754-02 1.725402 4.395-00 3.365-04 2.945-22 I.26-20 2.64E-46 7.375-72 2.295-97
1310qg 0.0054-02 1.49E-00 7.155-00 2.205402 4.625402 7.225402 9.585402 6.695+02 I5.66E402 5.065+02 4.59E402 4.19E401 3.225402 3.425402 3.275402 2.295+-02 2 645+01 2.41E401 2.20E+02 2.005+02 1.23E4022132013 0.005402 I2.522-00 5.65500 9.645-co 6.255-00 l.OIE-CO 2.275-0 7.035-05 5.225-0 3.935-12 3.07E-24 2.4 1 E-17 2.945-20 2.495-23 1.275-26 9.23E-30 7.255-33 5.595-36 4.395-39 3.445-42 2.695-4511330ri 0.005402 2.265-0 1.345+01 3.275+02 7.225+02 9.6554-01 9.335402 3.205402 1.335402 5.255-0 2,6125-00 2.275-00 5.235-02 2.345-02 2.055-02 4.7125-02 2.1225-02 9.455-03 4.245-03 2.905-03 2.525-0422340rg 0.005402 1.475-00 3.225-00 1.915-00 2.705-02 4.225-04 9.265-7 3.225-15 1.225-23 5.335-32 27.2740 9.675-49 4.135-57 2.75545 7.435.74 3.29E-22 2.365-90 50.20-911350vi 0.005401 2.533-00 2.205401 2.725401 3.925401 3.005401 1.665401 1.075-00 8.315-0 6.255-03 5.735-04 4.205-05 4.035-06 3.395-07 2.245-0 2.395-0 2.025-10 2.695-22 2.425-22 2.292-23 9.925-25
123251cm 0.005402 2.005-00 2.025402 3.925402 6.205402 9.225+02 2.025402 2.205402 2.2I55402 1.065402 9.745402 2.925+02I 2.165402 7.465+02 6.235402 6.255401 5.725402 5.235402 4.795402 4.325402 4.025402223251cm 0.005402 9.375-0 2.39E402 4.2654-01 4.06E402 12.22+02 2.275402 2 425.00 4.592-02 1.765-2 2.675-02 3.195-03 6.025-04 2,2I6E-04 2.225-0 4.225-06 2.045-7 2.535-07 2.935-0 5.525-0 2.065-091133Eem 0005402 1.5424-02 3.225402 62t95+02 9.615402 1.2354402 2.052+02 5.76E402 2.70E402 2.232+02 5.532-00 2.492-00 1.222-00 5.035-02 2.265-02 2.025-02 4.575-02 2.055-0 9.245-03 4.2E-03 2.27-03I234E5ern 0.005402 7.9125-00 9.24500 3.525-00 2.225-02 5.645.04 2.225-06 5.795-25 2.525-23 1.122-32 4.725.40 2.055-43 1.765-57 3.755-6 2.605.73 6.155-22 2.935-90 12E.25-9113551cm 0.005402 1.36E+02 3.205402 4.955402 5.265401 3.525402 1.17E401 2.925-00 1.692-02 2.445-02 1.2125-03 1.02E544 2.625-06 7.275-07 6.25-0 5.265-0 4.355-20 3.66E-22 3.095-212 2.60E-23 2.19E-1 4tl3IPari 0.005402 2.235402 3.232402 6.7125+02 2.145+03 1.755403 2.092+03 2.355403 2.255403 2.025403 2.9254+03 1.75E+03 1.605403 2.462+03 1.345403 2.225403 .1225403 2.02E+03 9.325402 2.525402 7.2554022232Pwt 0.005401 1.325E02 2.595402 2.9454.02 2.545402 2.25E402 2.-65-00 2.475-3 2.03E-06 1.622-09 1.275-22 1.00E-15 7.225-29 6.295-22 4.275-25 3.235-22 3.012E-31 2.375-34 2.262-37 2.46540 1.152431233Pmn 0.005402 2.37E402 6.235402 2.225+03 1.725403 2.165403 2.035403 2.235403 5.295402 2.405402 2.025402 4.17E401 2.292+02 9.255-00 4.435-00 2.99-00 1.95E-01 4.025-01 2.225-02 2.245-02 3.662-02l234Wat 0.005402 2.225+02 2.465402 6 04E+01 4.22-00 2.025-2 2.255-0 2.13-213 5.06E-22 2.225-30 9.37E-39 4025.47 1,7125-55 7.342-64 3.245-72 2.345-20 5.745-39 2.465-971235Pmt 0005402 2,205+02 5.065+02 2.495402 9.665402 6.725+02 3.625402 3.765402 3.3 25-00 2.325-0 2.335-02 2.005-03 1.695404 1.425-05 2.205-6 1.0tE-07 8.525-0 7.225-10 6.052-12 5.09E-12 4 295-23
Rb#6 0.005402 3.222-02 5.24E-01 6.755-02 5.325-02 3.255-02 2.995-02 4.545-02 I.04-02 2.375-03 5.405-04 2.235-04 2.322-05 6.432-06 2.475-0 3.355-07 7.655-02 2.752-02 3.99-09 9.225-20 2.025-10Cz234 0.005+02I 3.8225402 6.955401 2.05E402 6.392401 3.952402 2.455402 5.795-00 2.372-0 3.255-0 7.635-02 21.25.02 4.322 -03 2.022-03 2.42-04 5.722-05 1.35E-05 3.205-06 7.525-07 2.795-07 4.252-0C,236 0.005402 2.035402 2.275402 2.265402 2.705402 2.035402 6.275-00 2.422-00 3.175-01 7.1225-02 1.605-02 3.595-03 3.065404 2.225404 4.075-05 9.245-06 2.055-06 4.615-07 2.045-07 2.335-02 5.235-09C1137 0.005401 1.775+02 3.225402 3.735402 2.965401 1.23540 12.14E402 2 695.00 6.375-0 1.51-02 3.525-02 2.475-03 2025-03 4.755-0 2.235-04 2.672-0 6.325-06 2.505-06 3.3552-7 2.412-0 2.95-0Sb227 0.005402 2.042-00 3.302-00 4.122500 3.235.00 1.292-00 2.A2-0 2.212-02 4.315E-02 83.552-12.692-03 3.362-04 6.655-05 2.325-05 2.615-0 S.2I75-07 1.022-07 2.035-03 4.025-09 7.97E-20 2.525-20Sb229 0.0054-01 2.505-00 6.345-00 6.395-00 2.695-00 4.67E-02 3.09E-02 4.225E-04 2.295-06 2.245-02 5.922-22 3 025-13 1.605-25 3.332-23 4.335-20 12.2522 2.27524 6 095-27 3.27E-29 2.6E-32 2.575-34
Tul22m 0.002402 2.422-02 4.535-01 53922.02 4.635-02 23962.02 2.765-02I 4.152.02 9.775-03 2.305-03 5.4125-04 I.275404 3.005-05 7.065-06 2.665-06 3.91 5-07 9.205-02 2.275-02 .202-09 2.20-09 2.225-20Te227 0.002402 9.245-02 3.055-00 3.905-00 3.152-00 1.945E-00 2.2175-00 2.402-02 4.795-02 9.502-03 2.225-3 3.735-04 7.395-05 2.465-05 2.905-06 5.755-0 2.245-07 2.262-0 4.475-09 8.265-10 2.755-20
Te I29m 0.0054,02 4.9122-02 I2.575-00 2.022-00 2.605-00 9.245-02 6.052-02 2.405-02 3.262-02 7.575-03 2.765.03 4.025-04 9.475-05 2.202-05 5.205-06 2.2I32-06 2.752-07 6.325-02 12435-0 3.442-09 7.925-20Te229 0.0054-02 1.975-00 5.365-00 6.275-00 3.525-00 6.495-02 1.13E-02 53 55.04 3.042-06 1.532-0 2.245-22 4.222-23 2.235-15 2.265-27 6.035.20 3.245-22 1.63E-24 2.422-27 4.425 -29 2.29E-32 1.295-33
7c23i2m 0.005402 1.335-0 4.795-00 5.285-00 4.275.0 2.195.00 1.235-0 2.545-0 2.092-2 2.245-03 3.275-04 5.265-05 7.165-06 9.745-07 1.335-07 1.205-02 2.45E-09 3.345-10 4.545-12I 6.135-2 2.415-13Te132 0.005+021 2.2054-02 3.222+01 4.2254-01 3.692+02 2.235402 2.22E402 2.335-00 4.455-02 2.49E-02 2.625-02 3.095-03 5.295-0 2. 225-04 2.245-05 4.095.06 7.205-07 2.495.07 2.24502 5.422-09 2.035.09
B&137m 0.002402 1.7125401 3.162402 3.7354.02 2.962+02 2.235+02 1.245+02 2.695-00 6.375-02 2.522-01 3.535-02 2.47-03 2.025 -03 4.755-04 2.23E-04 2.675-05 6.325-06 1.305-0 3.555-07 I425-03 2.99-02Dm239 0.0024-02 3.702-00 7.205-00 3.402.00 3.665-02 4.245-03 4.675-05 6.745-22 9.712-27 1.402-22 2.025-22 2.925 -34 4.205-40 6.055-46 3.735-52 2.265-57 2.225-63 2.625-69 3.775-75 5.442-22 7345.27Bm240 0.005402 5.985-00 2.925 402 2.455402 2.9354-02 2.22401 7.145-00 2.605-00 3.605-02 2.075-02 2.225-02 4.075-03 9.235-04 2.055404 4.605-05 1.035-0 2.325-06 5.205-07 2.275-07 2.625-02 5.325-0Mo99 0.005402 7.232-02 2.495-00 3.232-00 2.395.00 2.365-00 7.765-02 2.4.4-02 2.655-02 4.91 5-03 9.075-0 2.6E-04 3.205O-05 5.745.06 1.062-06 1.965-07 3.635-02 6.705-09 2.245-09 2.292-2I0 4.245-22
Tc99m 0.0054-02 6.405-02 2.972-00 2.605-00 2.205-00 2.39E-00 2.272-02 2.575-02 2.922-02 5.392-03 9.97E-04 2.245-0 3.422-05 6.305-06 2.272-06 2.262-07 3.925-0 7.375-0 2.365-09 2.522-20 4.665-212RuIO3 0.005+02 7.65-02 2.365-00 3.035-00 2.405-00 2.425-00 9.095-02 2.122202 4.932E-02 2.1I55-02 2.67E.03 6.222404 2.455404 3.375-05 7.255-06 2.235-06 4.255-07 9.905-02 2.325.E0 35.375-09 1.252-0ROlOS 0.005+01 4.245-02 2.335-00 2.265-00 5.I4224 2.025-02 1.252-02 2.245404 7.065-07 4.365.0 2.70E-22 1.672-23 2.032-25 6.375-13 3.945-20 2.445-22 2.515-24 9.325 -27 5.765-29 3.562-32 2.202-33ROMl 0.005402 3.32R-02 2.22E-00 2.575-00 2.252-00 7.752-02 4.795-02 2.235-02 2.6aE.02 6.342-03 2.505-03 35342.04 B. 3224E5 2.925-05 4.695-06 2.225I -06 2.625-07 6.202-02 2.475-02 3.472-09 2.205-20
lIOS 0.002402 5.252-02 1.635-00 2.075-00 2.535-00 2.655-01 4.635-02 6.925-0 2.035-02 2.535-03 2.272-04 3.375-0 5.025-06 7.455-07 1.2I1I5-07 1.655-0 2.445-09 3.632-20 5.405-22 2.022-22 2.295-22Y90 0.005+02 5.142-03 2.635-02 6.295-2 2.265-02 2.43E-02 2.295-02 5.475-02 2.745-02 4.935-03 2.325-03 3.395-04 2.535-05 2.225-05 S.2172-06 1.255-0 3,035-07 7.275-0 1.742-0 4.165-09 9.922-20Y91 0.0024-02 4.695-0D2 2.545-0 2.202-02 2.275-02 2.325-02 1.605-02 2.15E-02 5.092I-03 2.192403 2.792-0 6.545-05 12535-05 3.595-06 8.402-07 2.972-07 4.605-02 2.012-02 2.525-0 5.925-20 2.32-20Y92 0.005402 2.292-02 2.465E0 3.205-00 3.235-00 7.205-02 2.295-02 3.355-04 2.055-07 2.395-0 4.405-22 2.022-24 2.395-27 5.555-20 2.295-22 3.01&2-2 7.025-22 2.635-30 3.302-33 1.365-36 2.062-32Y93 0.005402 4.995-02 2.50E-01 2.675-02 2.015-02 3.625-02 2.295-02 52875.04 2.675-05 1.22E.06 5.535-02 2.522-0 1.14510 5.205-22 2.375-23 2.025-24 4.90E-26 2.235-27 2.022-12 4.61E-20 2.2105-21
Zs95 0.002+02 5.222-02 2.275-02 2.402-02 2.925-02 1.27E-01 7.242-02 2.705-02 3.925-03 9.322-04 2.222-04 5.222-05 1.202-OS 2.8125-06 6.595-07 12342-07 3.625-02 2.425-09 2.995-09 4.662-20 2.095-20Za97 0.005+02 5.67E-02 2.75E-02 2.075-0 1.40FAl 6.262-02 2302E-02 2.505-03 2.235-04 2.99-05 2.725-06 2.525-07 2.425-08 2.265-09 1.235-10 2.025-22 2.975-23 2.025-24 7.255-25 6.3-156 5.695-27
Nb9S 0.005402 5.252-02 2.275-02 2.422-02 2.925-02 2.195-02 7.345-02 2.745-2 4.1222-3 9.755-04 2.325 -04 5.465-0 1.295-05 3.065-06 7.235-07 1.7125-07 4.045-02 9.565-0 2.265-09 5.345-20 1.265-10L&140O0.005402 2.622-02 4.355-1 1.225-.00 2.245-00 2.735-0 2.405-00 9.325-02 2.7125-021 7.045-02 2.732.02 4.232-03 9.64E544 2M22504 3.025-05 2.25E245 2.615-06 5.90-07 1.33E-07 2.995-02 6.735-09LxIA 0.005402 4.595-02 2.23E-02 2.225-02 4.345-02 6.475-03 9.655-0 3.202-06 2.065-02 3.535-22 2.275-23 3.192-26 2.295-22 4.222-22 2.425-23 - 4.722-P26 2.565-23 S.2195-31 1.725-33 5.722-36 2.90-38
PSAT 3019CF.QA.09Attachment 2
1.8142POO 4
... Am24ICrm242Crrk244CC14 IC,14SCOl"NP239Pu238Pu239PlOOPu24
Srs9Sr9oSr9lSr92Total
O.OOE+OI0 OOE+01O.OOE+02O.OOE+01OOOEI010 OOE+010OE+02O OOE+OIO.OOE+0O.OOE+00O.OOE0OIO.OOE+010 OOE+01O.OOE+000.0014v00.OOE+00O.OE+01O.OOE+0O
3 39E-025 19E-022.16E421.21E-0t3.921-037.1-E441.40E-01I 29E41LI.5E-012.120-009.09E-045.731ECS9.43A S2.6tE-23.771-004.59EIG04.264-003.73J-09.10E503
6.91E421.67E4016.90E-023.37E-051.26E-022.30tE034.49E-014.06E413.704-016.65-0021924-031.U45-43.02E-04t.60E-021.21E4011.47E-00
I.27E+019.204003.24E04
l.tE4-022.5E4-01t.t2E4024.977 S1.6 I E-022.96E-036.77E-014.99E4-14.76E-013.33E-003.75E032.36E543.19E5041.1IE-01I.5jE+0II.t9E401.4 1I+017.0E-00
466E-01 764E460 1.26E-06 5.56E-12 2.47E-17 109E.22 4.SE.23 2.16E-33 9.53E-39 4.22E-44 I.t7t-49 t.30E55 3.6JE-60 I 63E.63 7.23E.71.7E4-01
6 9E4-023.96E05I.2tE422.36E-034.5E4-013 65E413.79E-016.32E-002.9E-03I.tJE-043.09E.04t.o0E-0222E34011.51JE001.43E-001.95E400
1.09E13C4 21E4022.45E507.93E-032.46E5032 lE4-01I.90E5-12.34E5-13.544-00I.J5E-031.165-041.9 -E045.45E427.60E-009.33E4012.925-001.4tE41
6.79E-022.556E21.525-04 901-039.02E-041.735-Cl9.17E4-2I.455-lE1.9tE-001.14E4037.20E4Sl.1JE-043.37E-024.6E-005.77E15-
.01 E-001.12E-02
1.62E-025.69e-033.59E-61.6E-032114E-044.01E-02t.39E4023.42E4023.49E4C2.71E-041.7I E-052.lE4-057.99E-031.09E400I.3tE414.23E-024.335-062.375+05
3.71E-0312tE-033.SE2-072.73-04J.06E-059.29E-03I.9SS-31.095-36.JE4-026.42E5CS4.04E066.65E-06I.J9E4032.56E-013.24E-021.77W-032.135-92.29E+05
t 6tE442.133-042.02E-076.44E-051.20E5-32.15E-032.75E-041.91 PASL.O0E-2I.52E-059.53E507.35E-06
4 41E045.97E-027.6E-037.375-9.27E-131.97E+05
I.9E-046.30E-Ot4.735-0tI.32E45J2.t4E464.99E-043.1171Os4.521-41.90E-033 60W6227E-073.73E-071.06W41.40W-021.92E4033.07E4064.04E-161.71Et0O
4.50E301.40E-0S1.135-033.5E4-066.735-071.16E44S.44E461.07-043.35E-043.535-073.335-0O*.ttEt-02.52E-05326E-034 315-041.235-71.76E-19
1.49E+05
I.02E-OS3.13E-062.6tE409t.41E40711.9E-072.635-057.66E4072.525-OS5.905-CS2.025-07I.275-CS2.1 OEMtt.96E467.62W-04I.02E-0453351097.67E-231.32E+05
2.30566 97E5076.335101."9-73.7?E-0t6.22E4061.0-E475.97E-6I.04E5-O4.79Wt3.02E494.97?-091.41W3-61.73tE42.42E4052.23E-103.34E-261.14E+05
5.19E5072.55-071.51E2104.70Wt3.95-09I.44E461.52E5-01.41W506I.3JtE461.13E-07.15-l10l.ll-O93.344-074.16OS5.735.06932E5I21.46E-29I.OOE503
1.17E-073.46E-033.57E-I I1.11E-0t2.122-093.35E4072.1E4093.33E?073225-072.69E-092.69E-2O2.79E-107.92E-039.73n-6I.36E-063.t29E 136.34E-333.76E+04
2.64E5-t7.71E-09t.45E.122.62W-095.02E 107.76W03.001-107.ttE-0t3.66E5-6.37E-104.01E II6.60-llI2.3E-032.27E-63.224-071.62E.142.76E.367,6?E+04
594E-09I.72E-092.00E-126.12E-101.19E.101.05-034.23E-I1l.t6E5-t9.96E-091.51E-109.11E-121.56Eli14.4tE-093.3tlE477.62E-036.77E-161.20E-39
6.725404
I.34E-093.J3E-104.74E-131.46E-102.t2E- I I4.17E-095.95E-124.40W-091.75E-093.tE3 -I2,25E.123.71E-12
.O55-091.24E-07L.O5021t2E-173.251-435.90E504
3 21E-76 1.42E-533.02E-10 6.t0E-II9.3E3-II 1.90E-I I1.12E.13 266E.143.UEI-lI t.1112663E-12 1.6tE-129 67E-10 2.24E-103.37E513 .l23E-111.04E-09 2.46E5103.09E.10 343tEII3.47E.12 2.01E-125.34E.13 1.26E-131.73E513 2.0WE-l32.49E5-0 t.91E-Il2.9050 6.73E-094.23E-09 2.0IE-09I.lt-23 4.92E-202.29E-46 9.96E-505.19E504 4.36E+04I.3E+403 2.OE40S 4.14E+0S 4.70E+05
Memo to files Attachment 3 07/30/03From: J. MetcalfSubject: Impact of Skyshine on the Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to document the decision in the preliminary assessment ofTSC external shine not to include a contribution from skyshine in the model.
Approach
The MicroSkyshine computer (Reference 1) has been used to evaluate the potential for skyshineinfluencing the results of the TSC shine calculation. A second methodology (Reference 2) has alsobeen employed to confirm the estimate.
References
1. "MicroSkyshine User's Manual", Grove Engineering, 1987
2. Radiation Protection Design Guidelines for 0.1-100 MeV Particle Accelerator Facilities,National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Document NCRP No. 51, Eds.E. Murrill, J. Beyster, G. Brownell, A. Chilton, J. Haimson, C. Karymark, W. Kreger, J.Wyckoff and D. Grace, Washington, DC (1977)
3. Memo to file, B. Nowack "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP", 7/29/03
4. Memo to File, R. Sher, "Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation", 5/9/03
Analysis
The MicroSkyshine input for this case is as follows:
"record ver 3"PolestarAppliedTechnology1.18- 1.18-00110VYRBTestInput onlyCase never run3 ,GEOMETRY48.2 ,X.1, Y0, Z24.1, H22 ,R10 ,R20,T10 ,T224 ,L
I
Memo to files Attachment 3 07/30/03From: J. MetcalfSubject: Impact of Skyshine on the Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
21.9 ,W0,D5 ,M0,NO,C
.0012 ,RHO"sensitivity variable index (or 0):"0 ,SENSEVAR1 ,# saved results or 1
"# sensitivity cycles or I if none:"1 ,NCYCLES
"20 densities:"0
00
0
0
0
0
00
0
00
0
0.00120
0
0
0
0
0
1 ,BUILDUP INDEX8 ,QUADRATURE ORDER
"20 energies:"2.51.751.25.75.4.150
0
Memo to files Attachment 3 07/30/03From: J. MetcalfSubject: Impact of Skyshine on the Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
000000000000
"20 activities:"3.09e+147.81e+138.13e+132.27e+141.34e+143.13e+15000000000000000 ,1=RESULTS EXIST 0=NO
"no results exist."3 ,SOURCE MODE
"isotope bit flags:"
0 ,NUMBER OF ISOTOPES"end of source inputs. 5 decay times:"0000
Memo to files Attachment 3 07/30/03From: J. MetcalfSubject: Impact of Skyshine on the Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation
0
The model consists of the photons per second at t = 4 hours that correspond to the energies (byenergy group) that were used in the QADMOD-GP assessment, Reference 3. The distance fromthe centerline of the "silo" model is 48.2 m (158'), and the distance from the top of the "silo" tothe dose point is 24.1 m (79'). The resulting dose rate (the peak dose rate from the QADMOD-GP study and unshielded at the TSC) is 613 mr/hr.
Application of the second method requires the peak dose rate at the surface of the RB (about0.008 R/s) to be converted to cGy/s at a distance one meter from an imaginary point source.Knowing this, the associated skyshine can be estimated from the Reference 2 expression:
Dose rate in nSv/s = 2.49E5BxsDioQf2 3 /(dids)2
Where:Bxs is the ceiling transmission factor,Dio is the dose rate in cGy/s one meter from the source,0 is the solid angle of the beam,di is the distance from the point source to a point two meters above the ceiling, andds is the distance from the centerline of the beam to a the dose point.
This can be solved as follows for an assumed transmission factor of unity (unshielded) and anassumed beam angle of 2n steradians (a hemisphere):
Vol 42 ftx 72 ftx 72 ftx 3.14159or 684012.1 ft3 = 19383.95 m3R sph = 16.61739 mR cy = 21.95122 mSurface dose rate of cylinder = 8.OOE-03 R/sDose rate one meter from sphere center = 2.209102 R/s or cGy/sSource point relative to (below) shield = 0 MSolid angle of opening = 6.28318 radians (hemisphere)Horizontal distance to target = 48.2 mDose rate due to skyshine = 645.4972 nSv/sec = 0.002324 Sv/hr = 0.232379 rem/hr
This estimated peak dose rate is a factor of 2.6 smaller than the MicroShield calculation, but evenif the higher value is used, an 8" concrete shield for the low-energy scattered photons willdecrease the dose rate by a significant factor (a hundred times or more). This will make theskyshine dose rate in the single-digit mr/hr range compared to the direct shine peak dose rateswhich are about two orders of magnitude larger.
Conclusion
Skyshine dose rates are low enough with an 8" concrete shield to be neglected, and thepreliminary evaluation done with MicroShield (Reference 4) is acceptable.
4
Memo to files Attachment 4 07/29/03Fromn B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
MicroShield Dose Calculation for the Vermont Yankee Technical Support Center
A calculation of the integrated dose in the Technical Support Center (TSC) following a LOCArelease to the Reactor Building (RB) was performed using MicroShield MS5 and is described inReference 1. The RB was modeled as a cylinder equivalent in volume to the actual building. Thesource was assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout the free area of the building; howeverthe areas below the refuel floor are heavily shielded with at least 24 inches (61 cm) of concrete.The source volume that was considered in the calculation was the free volume above the refuelfloor. This portion of the RB is primarily steel sheet and beam construction and no shielding creditwas taken in the calculation. Two source correction factors were developed to: 1) account for thefraction of free volume represented by the volume above the refuel floor and 2) account for thefractional difference between the total building volume and the free volume. The calculation takescredit for an 8-inch horizontal concrete shield representing the floor above the TSC. However, itwas modeled as a vertical shield due to the limitations of the MicroShield code. The TSC receptorlocation was modeled at a horizontal distance of 127.7 feet from the centerline of the sourcevolume and a vertical distance of 100 feet below the centerline of the source volume. As statedabove, the portion of the RB below the refuel floor has an annular concrete shield. This shield"shadows" the TSC receptor from a portion of the source volume, reducing the dose rate. Since itis not possible for MicroShield to model the shadow effect of the annular shield, a correction factorwas calculated and applied to the results. The MicroShield dose rate results are presented in Table1.
Table 1. MicroShield Dose Rate Calculation ResultsMicroShield MicroShield
Time) Dose Rate Time) Dose Rate(hrs) (mrad/hr) (mrad/hr)
1 44.0 144 3.92 185.3 168 3.54 350.1 192 3.18 291.1 216 2.816 111.3 240 2.624 53.8 264 2.348 14.6 288 2.172 7.8 312 2.096 5.6 336 1.8120 4.5 360 1.6
Independent Review of TSC Dose Calculation Results Using QADMOD-GP
An independent review of the calculation was performed using QADMOD-GP (Reference 2).QADMOD-GP is a PC version of the mainframe code CCC-396/ QADMOD-G, a point-kemelintegration code for calculating gamma ray fluxes and dose rates at specific locations.QADMOD-GP allows the user to set up a three-dimensional source volume and three-
I
Memo to files Attachment 4 07/29/03From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
dimensional shielding geometry configurations. Source geometry configuration is represented byarraying isotropic point sources uniformly in a specified volume geometry. QADMOD-GPallows the use of plane, conical, cylindrical and spherical surface combinations to modelshielding configuration geometry. QADMOD-GP computes the distances through all regionstraversed by the line-of-sight ray from the source point to the designated receptor point. It takesinto account the geometry and the characteristics of the materials which the rays pass through.Energy dependent attenuation and build-up factors are applied to calculate the direct gamma raydose and gamma ray dose with build-up. For the review three models were simulated usingQADMOD-GP.
QADMOD-GP Cylindrical Model with no Annular Shield
This model was setup in order to directly compare MicroShield and QADMOD-GP results.Identical source strength and photon energy groups were used. Figure 1 is a plan view of the truebuilding dimensions (solid lines) and the equivalent cylindrical model (dashed lines). A cylindricalgeometry model was setup source volume identical to the MicroShield model. Distance to thereceptor (a radial distance 127.7 feet from the source centerline, a vertical distance of 100 feetbelow the source centerline) was identical to the MicroShield model. (Note that while the actualradial distance to the receptor is 157.7-feet, 127.7-feet was used in cylindrical model toapproximate the air gap between the outer wall of the RB and the receptor.)
Memo to files Attachment 4From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
07/29/03
Cylindrical Coordinates - TSC DosePoint Radial Distance 127.7'
-
I I<Nj!
Rectangular Coordinates - TSC DoseI Point Radial Distance = 157.7'
Colum Line F
Figure 1. Equivalent Cylinder.
One difference between the MicroShield model and the QADMOD-GP model was that the 8-inchhorizontal concrete shield representing the floor above the TSC was modeled as a horizontal shield(the as-built configuration). A dose rate comparison of the MicroShield model and the firstQADMOD-GP model was made for nine time points, 1-hour, 2-hours, 4-hours, 8-hours, 24-hours,48-hours, 144-hours, 240-hours and 336-hours. (The QADMOD-GP input data sheets arepresented in Attachment 1.) During this review it was noted that the MicroShield code partitionsgamma decay energies into 25 groups whereas QADMOD-GP uses 6 energy partitions. The use of6 partitions causes the calculated dose rates to be overestimated, especially for low energy photons.As such, it was necessary to set up the MicroShield model using 6 energy partitions to validate thecomparison to QADMOD-GP. The results of the comparison are shown in Table 2 below:
Memo to files Attachment 4 07/29/03From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
Table 2. MicroShield and QADMOD-GP Dose Rate Comparison
MicroShield MicroShield QADMOD Percent Dose RateTime Dose Rate Dose Rate Dose Rate Dosence(hrs) (mrad/hr) (mrad/hr) (mrem/hr) Difference
25 Partitions 6 Partitions 6 Partitions1 44.0 48.4 47.6 -2%2 185.3 209.7 199.4 -5%4 350.1 403.4 383.5 -5%8 291.1 345.5 328.3 -5%
24 53.8 71.6 83.3 16%48 14.6 28.3 32.8 16%144 3.9 11.0 13.2 20%240 2.6 6.6 7.3 10%336 1.8 4.1 4.9 19%
It is worth noting that the fractional distribution of photon energy groups are dominated by highenergy photon during the first 12 hours (e.g., 41% of all photons have an average energy of 2.5MeV at time = 1-hour) and that thereafter the fractional distribution rapidly shifts to low energyphotons (e.g., 86% of all photons have an average energy of 0.15 MeV at time = 24-hours). Thedifferences in the calculated dose rates clearly correspond to the shift in the energy spectrum tolower energy photons. This is a minor difference in comparing calculated dose rates using twodifference codes. It appears that the MicroShield and QADMOD-GP results for the CylindricalModel with no Annular Shield provide consistent results and that the model used in theMicroShield model is valid.
QADMOD-GP Cylindrical Model including the Annular Shield
To develop the second model, the first QADMOD-GP cylindrical model was modified to include a24-inch thick concrete annular shield in the RB from grade level up to the refueling floor level.Dose rates for several distances were calculated to obtain a representation of how rates varied.
A comparison of dose rates for time points at 1-hour, 2-hours, 4-hours and 8-hours werecalculated for various distances at the height of the TSC receptor. (The QADMOD-GP inputdata sheets are presented in Attachment 2.) For the TSC receptor, the shielding value of theannular shield decreases as the radial distance from the source increases. This is a result of theshadow effect. Conversely, the photon flux decreases with distance as a result of the l/r2
geometric effect plus attenuation. A plot of TSC dose rates as a function of distance is presentedin Figure 2.
A
Memo to files Attachment 4From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
07/29/03
Shielded Dose Rate vs. DistanceCylindrical Geometry
100
90 1 X
70
L60 .. .1 hr DR-- 5_2 hr OR.4 hr DR
E 40. - -(8hr DR
100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 240.0
Distance (ft)
Figure 2. Shielded Dose Rates
In the first QADMOD-GP model (cylindrical model with no annular shield) dose rate iscalculated as a function of the I/r2 geometric effect, attenuation and the 8-inch horizontal shield.The second model adds the annular shield and presents a more realistic representation actualconfiguration in the calculation of the dose rate as a function of distance. The combination ofthese effects results in peak dose rate at approximately the radial distance range of 125 to 130-feet from the source centerline. Figure 2 also indicates that use of the radial distance of 127.7was an optimum choice for the calculation since it results in the worst-case dose rates.
As previously stated, a correction factor was calculated and applied to the MicroShield results toaccount for the shadow effect of the annular shield. The QADMOD-GP shielded and non-shielded dose rate calculations were compared to determine the "shielding factor" and compare itto the correction factor used in the MicroShield calculation. A plot of the ratio of theQADMOD-GP non-shielded dose rate / shielded dose rate ratio as a function of distance ispresented in Figure 3.
C
Memo to files Attachment 4From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
07/29/03
Shielding Ratios for Cylindrical Geometry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...t................. .......'I-i-- ii
6 .
z ----'-thi- ----i- -... . -.... ............. . . . ...... i......,......v.. .. . .............. ...... - - -
I hr Rat:o.... . ... .................................. . ..... . ... . ........................ 2 ;rR t
_ i *. i:;:\< . . , * . E i ..~~~~-3 2 hr Rati
A 4 hr Ratio3o' X ' E he i ..' i .i .* 8 hr Rato
. ............... ,............4'''''"'' ...... ..... ... ,..................... .... i... ..... ...
(i 2 ., .,: '. . ',C0
1_. . __*. _. . ,.... ......... ... ...... . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. - . . .. . . .
. ............. ...... ...... ..... ................ i.!.... ..... I--- ...... --- ............. ..... '.....
0100 150 200 250
Distance (ft)
I
Figure 3. Shielding Ratios
As expected the shielding factor (shadow effect) of the annular shield diminishes with distance,as the angle to the receptor becomes shallower, approaching unity. For the receptor in the TSC, ashielding ratio of 2.0 appears to be a conservative assumption.
QADMOD-GP Rectangular Model including the Annular Shield
A third model using QADMOD-GP was setup using rectangular geometry. Results from therectangular geometry and cylindrical geometry (with annular shield) were compared as a meansto validate the use of the cylindrical model used in the MicroShield calculation. For therectangular model, dose rates for time points at 4-hours and 8-hours were calculated for variousdistances at the height of the TSC. (The QADMOD-GP input data sheets are presented inAttachment 3.) A plot of the cylindrical and rectangular 4-hour dose rates as a function ofdistance is presented in Figure 4. Though it is not shown, the 8-hour data resulted in a similarplot.
---
Memo to files Attachment 4From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
07/29/03
Cylindrical vs. RectangularQADMOD Dose Rate Comparison (4 hr)
100 - -CyIdrical Dose Rate
90 Rectangular Dose Rate
80
70 -
60
E 50 -
E 40 -
30-
20
10
0 ..100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Distance from Centerline of Building (ft)
Figure 4. Cylindrical vs. Rectangular Dose Rate Comparison
Figure 4 clearly shows that the use of a cylindrical model yields higher dose rates in the range ofdistances corresponding to the TSC receptor and is a more conservative model. It is noted thatthe dose rates merge as distance from the source and the annular shield increases. This isexpected since the source starts to look like a point source and comes out of the shadow ofannular shield. It should also be emphasized that both the MicroShield and QADMOD-GPcylindrical calculations use a radial distance of 127.7-feet for the TSC receptor (as anapproximation associated with use of cylindrical geometry). This produces a conservativeestimate of the dose rate since the actual RB structure is cubic (see Figure 1) and the actual TSCreceptor is expected to be at a further radial distance of 157.7-feet.
.7
Memo to files Attachment 4 07/29/03From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
Conclusions
It is concluded that the MicroShield cylindrical model is valid and that provides conservativeestimates of dose rates. The following conservatisms are included in the MicroShield model:
. Radial Distance - The cylindrical calculations use a radial distance of 127.7-feet whereas theactual TSC receptor is expected to be at a further radial distance of 157.7-feet.
* Shielding Factor - Choosing a shielding factor of 2 is conservative since the calculationindicates a range from about 2.5 to 4 for various distances within the TSC.
* Cylindrical Model - The use of a cylindrical model is conservative since the comparison ofcylindrical and rectangular models shows that cylindrical model yields higher dose rates inthe range of distances corresponding to the TSC receptor.
References
1. Memo to File, R. Sher, "Vermont Yankee TSC Integrated Dose Calculation", 5/9/03
2. RSIC Code Package CCC-565, "QADMOD-GP Point Kernel Gamma Ray Shielding Codewith Geometric Progression Buildup Factors" November 1990
e
Memo to files Attachment 4From: B. NowackSubject: MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP
07/29/03
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison(Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
QADMOD Concrete AnnulusCylindrical GeometryQADMOD Input Data (4 runs)
QADMOD Concrete AnnulusRectangular GeometryQADMOD Input Data (2 runs)
0
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
1 hr - Air Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry6 20 0
8.61+130.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 210 211 2
2.33
25 232.5
0.409AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
3 2 8 11 1 -20 0 0 3 S 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
S
6
74S6
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.104 0.100 0.205 0.051 0.130
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft
110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
in
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
2hr - Air6 20 0
3.73+14.0.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 210 211 2
2.33
25 232.5
0.48AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
Annulus30
20
Cylindrical Geometry8 11 1 -20 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.00.00.0
313.0333.3
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
S
6
7456
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.750.09
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.071 0.127 0.042 0.19
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft.130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
11
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
4hr - Air Annulus6 2 30 0 0
7.77+140.0 100.0
800.0 900.01600.0 1700.02720.0 2820.03520.0 3620.0
0.0 0.39273.1416 3.53436.2832
1 0 12 0.02 0 12 0.03 3 0.04 3 313.05 3 333.36 3 2720.07 3 4000.08 0 12 0.01 28 3 42 21 2 33 28 4 54 11 2 45 28 5 66 21 2 57 21 6 78 21 2 69 21 8 310 2 1 8 411 2 1 8 5
2.331.22-03
25 232.5 1.750.45 0.08
AIR EXP
2256.0 0.02300.0 0.03352.8 0.03657.6 0.03892.3 0.03962.4 0.04267.2 0.04572.0 0.04806.7 0.05181.6 0.06096.0 0.06858.0 0.07620.0 0.0
20
Cylindrical Geometry8 11 1 -20 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
2.35625.4978
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.74895. 8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
5
6
7456
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
1003202000
1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.06 0.1 0.03 0.28
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM00 O00000000000-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft.130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
12
f
Attachment I to 'MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
8hr - Air6 20 0
8.50+140.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.28321 0 122 0 123 34* 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 210 211 2
2.33
25 232.5
0.323AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
I Annulus30
100.0900.01700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.3
* 2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
- Cylindrical Geometry2 8 11 1 -20 0 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900. 03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.0
700.01500.0
3320.0 3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
S
6
7456
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
1001003203202000200030003000
1003202000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.060 0.049 0.089 0.024 0.455
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft
110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
13
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
24 hr - Ai6 20 0
5.94+140.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 3S 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 210 211 2
2.33
25 232.5
0.020AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
ir Annulus3 20 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 4!8 5 61 2 5 i1 6 71 2 6 '1 8 3 41 8 4 !1 8 5 4
- Cylindrical Geometry8 11 1 -20 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100 .01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
0.00.0
* 400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
2195.07000
0.0 2134.0
7I5S
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.008 0.016 0.072 0.025 0.859
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft
110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
1A
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
48 hr - Air6 20 0
2.75+140.0
800.01600.0 12720.0 a3520.0
0.0 C3.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 3 48 0 121 282 213 284 115 286 217 218 219 2110 2 111 2 1
2.331.
25 232.5
0.000AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
Annulus3 20 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.01620.00.39271.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
.720.04000.0
0.03 42 3 44 52 455 62 5 66 72 6 78 3 48 4 584S 58 56
- Cylindrical Geometry8 11 1 -20 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.0 400.01100.0 1200.01900.0 2000.03020.0 3120.03820.0 3920.01.1781 1.57084.3197 4.7124
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355. 1051
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.40.001 0.007 0.063 0.048
0.150.881
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft
110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
1S
Attachment 1 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
144 hr - Air Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry60
1.23+140.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 12
2 3 2 8 110 0 0 0 3
1 -25 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
3456781234567891011
33333
0 1222212222222
2.33
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51. 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 85
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
4
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2134.0
5
6
7456
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000100320
2000
1.22-0325 23
2.50.000
AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06856.07620.0
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.40.000 0.000 0.021 0.077
0.150.902
0.00.00.00.0
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
0.0
0.00.0
0.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
1i
Attachment 1 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
240hr - Air Annulus -6 2 3 20 0 0 0
7.20+130.0 100.0
800.0 900.0 11600.0 1700.0 12720.0 2820.0 23520.0 3620.0 3
0.0 0.3927 03.1416 3.5343 36.2832
1 0 12 0.0 22 0 12 0.03 3 0.04 3 313.05 3 333.36 3 2720.07 3 4000.08 0 12 0.0 2:1 28 3 42 21 2 3 43 28 4 54 11 2 4 55 28 5 66 21 2 5 67 21 6 78 21 2 6 79 21 8 3 410 2 1 8 4 511 2 1 8 5 6
2.331.22-03
25 232.5 1.75
0.00 0.00AIR EXP
2256.0 0.0 34.2300.0 0.0 3:3352.8 0.0 3:3657.6 0.0 313892.3 0.0 3:3962.4 0.0 314267.2 0.0 314572.0 0.0 314806.7 0.0 315181.6 0.0 3:6096.0 0.0 316858.0 0.0 317620.0 0.0 31
Cylindrical Geometry8 11 1 -20 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
200.0000.0800.0920.0720.0.7854.9270
195.07000
134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
30000
30000
30000
3000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.25 0.75 0.4 0.15O.000 0.021 0.091 0.888
W0.0L2.0L2 .012.012.012.0L2.0L2.0L2.0L2.0L2.0L2.0L2.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
17
Attachment I to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"MicroShield to QADMOD Comparison (Cylindrical Geometry - Unshielded Annulus)
QADMOD Input Data (9 runs)
336 hr - 16 20 0
4.26+130.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 210 211 2
2.33
25 232.5
0.000AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
Air Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry3 2 8 11 1 -2 10 0 0 3 5 0
0 22 13 16 0 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
2720.04000.0
0.03 3 4L 2 33 4 5L 2 4
5 6I 2 5
6 7I 2 6
8 38 48 5
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00. 78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0a1a18111111
4
5
6
74S6
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.40.000 0.000 0.025 0.109
0.150.867
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
IR
Attachnment 2 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Cylindrical Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (4 runs)
1 hr - Concre6 20 0
8.61+130.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 110 111 1
2.33
25 232.5
0.409AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
ste Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry3 2 8 11 1 -2 00 0 0 3 5 0
22 13 16 0 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.32720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
5
6
7456
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
1001003203202000200030003000
1003202000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.104 0.100 0.205 0.051 0.130
0.00.00.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
19
Attachment 2 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Cylindrical Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (4 runs)
2hr - Concrete6 2 3o 0 0
3.73+140.0 o C
-800.0 90C1600.0 170C2720.0 282C3520.0 '362C
0.0 0.3S3.1416 3.536.2832
1 0 12 C2 0 12 03 3 04 3 3135 3 3336 3 27207 3 40008 0 12 01 2 8 32 2 1 23 2 8 44 1 1 25 2 8 56 2 1 27 2 1 68 2 1 29 1 1 810 1 1 811 1 1 8
2.33
Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry2 8 11 1 -2 00 0 3 5 0
22 13 16 0 0
[.00.0
'.0
P.OO'.0
O.0927343
O.0
0.03.0.3D.o0.D.04
546
736345
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.0 400.01100.0 1200.01900.0 2000.03020.0 3120.03820.0 3920.01.1781 1.57084.3197 4.7124
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
4
S
6
74S6
000000
.0000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-0325 23
2.50.48
AIR EXP
2256.02300.033S2.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.068S8.07620.0
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.40.09 0.071 0.127 0.042
0.150.19
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft75.5 ft
110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft1S0.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
20
Attachment 2 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Cylindrical Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (4 runs)
4hr - Concret6 20 0
7.77+140.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 2 J6 2:7 2:8 29 110 111 1
2.33
25 232.50.45
AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
:e Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry3 2 8 11 1 -2 00 0 0 3 5 0
22 13 16 0 0
100.0900. 0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.3
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 3B 4 51 2 4B 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01.17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
5
6
74S6
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.08 0.06 0.1 0.03 0.28
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.03.12.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
21
Attachment 2 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Cylindrical Geometiy
QADMOD Input Data (4 runs)
8hr - Concret6 20 0
8.50+140.0
800.01600.02720.03520.0
0.03.14166.2832
1 0 122 0 123 34 35 36 37 38 0 121 22 23 24 15 26 27 28 29 110 111 1
2.33
25 232.5
0.323AIR EXP
2256.02300.03352.83657.63892.33962.44267.24572.04806.75181.66096.06858.07620.0
:e Annulus - Cylindrical Geometry3 2 8 11 1 -2 00 0 0 3 5 0
22 13 16 0 0
100.0900.0
1700.02820.03620.00.39273.5343
0.00.00.0
313.0333.0
2720.04000.0
0.08 3 41 2 38 4 51 2 48 5 61 2 51 6 71 2 61 8 31 8 41 8 5
200.01000.01800.02920.03720.00.78543.9270
2195.07000
2134.0
300.01100.01900.03020.03820.01. 17814.3197
400.01200.02000.03120.03920.01.57084.7124
500.01300.02100.03220.04000.01.96355.1051
600.01400.02195.03320.0
700.01500.0
3420.0
2.3562 2.74895.4978 5.8905
0.0 2195.00.0 7000
0.0 2134.0
4
5
6
74
6
03000
03000
03000
03000216021602160
00000000000
100100320320
2000200030003000
100320
2000
1.22-03
1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.060 0.049 0.089 0.024 0.455
0.00.00.0
0.0
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.0
3420.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0312.0
MREM0000000000000
-1
PER HOURHt 112ft
75.5 ft110.0 ft120.0 ft127.7 ft130.0 ft140.0 ft150.0 ft157.7 ft170.0 ft200.0 ft225.0 ft250.0 ft
22
Attachment 3 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Rectangular Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (2 runs)
4hr - Concrete6 2 30 0 0
7.77+14-2194.5 -200t-600.0 -4011000.0 12012720.0 282(3520.0 362C
-1706.8 -1501-100.0 lOC1500.0 170E
1 1 21332 2 164!3 1 -213:4 2 -164!5 3 C6 3 3137 3 3338 3 272C9 3 400C
10 1 219411 2 170612 1 -219413 2 -170614 0 12 C
1 2 1 22 2 1 23 2 1 24 210 115 1 1106 1 1107 1 1108 1 1129 1 112
10 1 11211 1 2 312 1 2 313 1 2 314 1 1 315 1 1 316 1 1 317 214 1018 214 1019 214 1020 214 1021 214 122 114 123 214 124 214 125 214 126 214 127 214 128 214 129 214 1230 214 1231 214 1232 214 1233 214 1034 214 1035 214 1036 214 10
2.33
Annulus - Rectangular Geometry2 14 36 1 -2 10 0 3 5 0
22 13 17
).0).0
Lo o6.O8).65.0'.0
1.6
1.65.90.01.01.3O.0
6.94.6
6.9O.6
1.033312131313222121212
444
1111111111111111111111111111111113131313
-1800.0-200.01400.02920.03720.0
-1300.0300.0
10000.04 5 64 6 74 7 8
13 8 911 5 611 6 711 7 811 5 611 6 711 7 813 5 613 6 713 7 813 5 613 6 713 7 85 66 77 88 95 66 77 88 95 66 77 88 95 66 77 88 9
12 5 612 6 712 7 812 8 9
-1600.00.0
1600.03020.03820.0
-1100.0500.0
-1400.0200.01800.03120.03920.0-900.0
700.0
0.0 10000.0
-1200.0400.02000.03220.04000.0-700.0900. 0
100100100100
216021602160
000
-2160-2160-2160
000
30003000300030003000300030003000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000
0000
-1000.0600.0
2194.53320.0
-500.0 -300.01100.0 1300.0
0 0
-800.0800.0
3420.0
100100100100000
170017001700
000
-1700-1700-1700
0000
30003000300030003000300030003000
0000
-3000-3000-3000-3000
10032020003000
1003202000
1003202000
1003202000
1003202000
10032020003000
100320
20003000
10032020003000
1003202000300010032020003000
1.22-0325 23
23
Attachment 3 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Rectangular Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (2 runs)
2.5 1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.45 0.08 0.06 0.1 0.03 0.28
AIR EXPMREM PER HOUR
3413.8 0.0 3420.0 0 Ht 112ft2300.0 0.7809 312.0 0 75.5 ft3352.8 0.7809 312.0 0 110.0 ft3657.6 0.7809 312.0 0 120.0 ft3892.3 0.7809 312.0 0 127.7 ft3962.4 0.7809 312.0 0 130.0 ft4267.2 0.7809 312.0 0 140.0 ft4572.0 0.7809 312.0 0 150.0 ft4806.7 0.7809 312.0 0 157.7 ft5181.6 0.7809 312.0 0 170.0 ft6096.0 0.7809 312.0 0 200.0 ft6858.0 0.7809 312.0 0 225.0 ft7620.0 0.7809 312.0 0 250.0 ft
-1
24
Attachment 3 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Rectangular Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (2 runs)
8hr - Co60
8.50+14-2194.5-600.01000.02720.03520.0-1706.8
-100.01500.0
1 12 23 14 25 36 37 38 ,39 3
10 111 212 113 214 0 121 22 23 24 25 1
ncrete Annulus - Rectangular2 3 2 14 36 10 0 0 0 3 5
-2000.0-400.01200.02820.03620.0
-1500.0100.01706.82133.61645.9-2133.6-1645.9
0.0313.0333.327iO.04000.02194.61706.9-2194.6-1706.9
0.01 2 31 2 31 2 3
10 11 121 10 13
-1800.0-200.01400.02920.03720.0-1300.0300.0
10000.04 5 64 6 74 7 8
13 8 911 5 6
-1600.00.0
1600.03020.03820.0
-1100.0500.0
Geometry-2 10
-1400.0200.01800.03120.03920.0-900.0700.0
22 13 17
0.0 10000.0
6789
101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536
1 11 11 11 11 11 21 21 21 11 11 12 142 142 142 142 141 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 14
2.33
1010121212333333
10101010
111111111212121210101010
1313222
1212124441111
111111111111111111111111111113131313
111111111113131313131356785678567BS67812121212
78678678678
-1200.0400.02000.03220.04000.0-700.0900.0
100100100100
216021602160
000
-2160-2160-2160
000
30003000300030003000300030003000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000-3000
0000
-500.0 -300.01100.0 1300.0
-1000.0600.02194.53320.0
100100100100000
170017001700
000
-1700-1700-1700
0000
30003000300030003000300030003000
0000
-3000-3000-3000-3000
100320
20003000
100320
200D1003202000
100320
2000100320
200010032020003000
10032020003000
10032020003000
1003202000300010032020003000
0 0
-800.0800.0
3420.0
6789 2.33
1.22-0325 23
25
Attachment 3 to "MicroShield 5 Verification Using QADMOD-GP"QADMOD Concrete Annulus Rectangular Geometry
QADMOD Input Data (2 runs)
2.5 1.75 1.25 0.75 0.4 0.150.323 0.060 0.049 0.089 0.024 0.455
AIR EXPMREM PER HOUR
3413.8 0.0 3420.0 0 Ht 112ft2300.0 0.7809 312.0 0 75.5 ft3352.8 0.7809 312.0 0 110.0 ft3657.6 0.7809 312.0 0 120.0 ft3892.3 0.7809 312.0 0 127.7 ft3962.4 0.7809 312.0 0 130.0 ft4267.2 0.7809 312.0 0 140.0 ft4572.0 0.7809 312.0 0 150.0 ft4806.7 0.7809 312.0 0 157.7 ft5181.6 0.7809 312.0 0 170.0 ft6096.0 0.7809 312.0 0 200.0 ft6858.0 0.7809 312.0 0 225.0 ft7620.0 0.7809 312.0 0 250.0 ft
-1