doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 1

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Submission Title: [Reports on Telconferences After Palm Springs’ Meeting]Date Submitted: [November 2012]Source: Huan-Bang Li [NICT], Suhwook Kim[LGE], Myung Lee [CUNY]Address [3-4 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan]Voice:[+81 468475104], FAX: [:[+81 468475431], E-Mail:[lee@nict.go.jp]

Re: [Report on TG15.8 call conferences]

Abstract: [Summary of teleconfernces]

Purpose: [This document is to provide a summary on TG15.8 teleconferences]

Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 2

Reports on Telconferences After Palm Springs’ Meeting

Huan-Bang Li, Suhwook Kim, Myung-Jong Lee(NICT), (LGE), (CUNY)

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)

Two Teleconferences were set afterPalm Springs’ Meeting

• 1st teleconference: October 9 (Tuesday), US EST

• US EST 8:00pm , 5:00pm PST, Japan, Korea: 9:00am, China: 8:00am

• TGD Discussion

• 2nd teleconference October 30 (Tuesday), US EST

• US EST 9:00am, PST 6:00am, Japan, Korea, 10:00 pm, China 9:00pm.

• Discussion forTGD and CFP

• Plan for November meeting

Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 4

• DCN: 15-12-0557-00-0008: “Views of PAC operation and requirements”

• Main discussion

‒ PAC device (PD) can provide bridge to infrastructure but not necessary.

‒ Multi-hop relay.

‒ Universal interoperability.

‒ Data integrity and confidentiality.

‒ ID and multiple ID for a PD

‒ Discovery identity (DID)

Teleconference On 9th October, 2012

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 5

‒ PAC features including discovery shall be independent and without intervention from/to (higher layers of) infrastructure.

‒ Main features (various IDs, security) must be self-contained, while allowing optional access to infrastructure.

‒ Besides PAC IDs, higher layer IDs (Universal ID in special case) are necessary, which can be deployed without infrastructure.

‒ Need a specific peer identity information for peer discovery.

Continuing Argument By E-mailAfter 1st Teleconferences

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 6

• DCN: 15-12-0562-00-0008: “TG8 Technical Guidance Document - additional requirements”

• Main discussion

‒ All PDs shall support at least one common communication mode.

That is true when ‘at a same frequency band’

‒ A PD may use multiple discovery identities at the same time.

Need to clarify definition first.

‒ Discovery ID

Need to clarify definition first.

Teleconferences On 30th October, 2012

doc.: IEEE 802.15-12-0578-01-0008

Submission

November 2012

Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY)Slide 7

• Towards next step

‒ Encourage presentations on definitions of various IDs at November meeting.

‒ Solicit contributions related to regulations and channel models to facilitate drafting Call For Proposal.

‒ Require further comments on TGD of revision 6. (DCN385-06) and clean version TGD (DCN568-00)

Teleconferences On 30th October, 2012(Continue)