BABEL BAHR · Title: BABEL BAHR Created Date: 6/15/2017 1:24:15 PM
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0 Submission Nov 2009 Michael Bahr, Siemens AGSlide 1 RFI Tüddelkram...
-
Upload
caleb-brennan -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0 Submission Nov 2009 Michael Bahr, Siemens AGSlide 1 RFI Tüddelkram...
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
RFI TüddelkramDate: 2009-11-16
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Bahr Siemens AG,
Corporate Technology
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 80200 München Germany
636-49926 bahr et siemens dot com
Authors:
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Abstract
Asking the Task Group about a direction for resolving miscellaneous RFI comments.
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Content
• PANN & RANN in Beacon
• Implementation Confusion with CIDs 953 & 954
• Periodicity in PANN / RANN
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
PANN & RANN in Beacon
Why they should be removed
• beacon bloat (15+19 = 34 byte)
• security: not protected
• implementation cannot count on them
• method: periodic PANN & RANN management frames inside mesh BSS
Why they should be there
• beacons are sent anyway
• method: periodic PANN & RANN elements in beacons
442 17 37-43 7.2 Format of individual frame types
Open the portal and root announcments "may bepresent". And therefore they may also beabsent. So an implementation cannot counton them to be there.
Let's just remove them from beacons becausebeacon bloat is becoming a problem.
Defer Big question. See 846
846 17 38-51 7.2 Format of individual frame types
Open Portal Announcement and RootAnnouncement are management framesimportant for mesh operation. They should beprotected. This is not the case for beacons.Furthermore, it is not necessary that non-peermesh STA know about these twoannouncements.
Do not allow Portal and Root announcementin Beacon. Delete rows 50 and 51.
Defer Big question. See 442
1084 19 32 7.2 Format of individual frame types
Open The "root announcement" and the "portalannouncement" elements are conspicuouslymissing from table 7-15
Add the missing elements? Defer Must be resolved with CIDs 442 and 846
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Strawpoll
Should the RANN & PANN be removed from the beacon?• CIDs 442, 846 accept
• Yes: No: Don‘t know/Don‘t care:
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
953 197 24 D. ASN.1 encoding of the MAC and PHY MIB
Closed 05/14/09 dot11MeshHWMPEnabled is never used delete it Accept Done 3,01
954 197-198 65-8 D. ASN.1 encoding of the MAC and PHY MIB
Closed 05/14/09 dot11MeshHWMPEnabled is never used delete it Accept Done 3,01
Implementation Confusion with CIDs 953 & 954
Draft D3.04: • still there as dot11MeshHWMPActivated
• renaming happened with D3.02
Locations:• Table 7-8 Beacon frame body
• Dot11MeshStationConfigEntry
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Solution (A)
Delete dot11MeshHWMPActivated (Accepted resolution to CIDs 953 & 954)
• Table 7-8 Beacon frame body
• no entry in Dot11MeshStationConfigEntry
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Solution (B)
Replace with MIB variable that holds the path selection protocol identifier of the active path selection protocol
• Table 7-8 Beacon frame body
• Dot11MeshStationConfigEntry
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Strawpoll
Which solution do you prefer?• Solution (A): delete dot11MeshHWMPActivated
• Solution (B): replace with MIB variable dot11MeshActivePathSelectionProtocol
A: B: D(on‘t care):
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Periodicity in PANN / RANN
• CIDs 156, 157, and 645 want to add the interval to the Portal Announcement (PANN) element and the Root Announcement (RANN) element respectively
• Proposed resolution: – reject
• Reasons: – Both PANN and RANN are purely informative elements that only
annouce the presence of a portal or a root mesh STA– They don‘t setup any forwarding information that would need to
be maintained– Mesh stations in power save mode won‘t miss PANNs and
RANNs (stored at transmitting mesh STA until receiver becomes available)
Nov 2009
Michael Bahr, Siemens AG
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1259r0
Submission
Motion: Periodicity in PANN / RANN
• Moved, to resolve CIDs 156, 157, and 645 with
• resolution „Reject“ and • with resolution notes:
The inclusion of a periodicity field in the PANN and RANN information elements is not considered necessary, because
– Both PANN and RANN are purely informative elements that only annouce the presence of a portal or a root mesh STA
– They don‘t setup any forwarding information that would need to be maintained
– Mesh stations in power save mode won‘t miss PANNs and RANNs (stored at transmitting mesh STA until receiver becomes available)
• Mover: Seconder:
• Yes: No: Abstain