Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders:...

7
Novembe r 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI doc.: IEEE 802.11- 01/618 Submission High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth Gummadi, M.S., Sean Coffey, Ph.D. & Chris Heegard, Ph.D. Texas Instruments 141 Stony Circle, Suite 130 Santa Rosa California 95401 (707) 521-3060, [email protected]

description

doc.: IEEE /618r0 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI CCK-OFDM at the TX Data Scrambler BCC Encoder (k = 7) Puncture Interleave Constellation Mapping 64-pt Inverse FFT Uncoded Information Bits Cyclic Extension (80 samples) To RF subsection Depends on data rate BPSK, QPSK, 16 QAM, 64QAM

Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders:...

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618

Submission

High performance encoders:What must be added to an IEEE

802.11b transmitterSrikanth Gummadi, M.S.,

Sean Coffey, Ph.D. & Chris Heegard, Ph.D.

Texas Instruments 141 Stony Circle, Suite 130

Santa Rosa California 95401(707) 521-3060,[email protected]

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

A submitted compromise• Summary:

– Both CCK/OFDM and PBCC transmitters are mandatory– Must implement one of either CCK/OFDM or PBCC receiver

• or both– Systems with either receiver can interoperate

• With 11b networks via CCK• Within and between each other via new high rate modes

• Details: IEEE 802.11-01/446r0

CCK/OFDM Receiver

PBCC Receiver

24 Mbps, CCK/OFDM Packet

22 Mbps, PBCC Packet

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

CCK-OFDM at the TX

Data Scrambler

BCCEncoder(k = 7)

Puncture InterleaveConstellation

Mapping

64-ptInverse

FFT

UncodedInformation

Bits

CyclicExtension

(80 samples)

To RF subsection

Depends on data

rate

BPSK, QPSK, 16 QAM, 64QAM

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

PBCC at the TX

Data Scrambler

BCCEncoder(k = 7/9)

Cover Sequence

ConstellationMapping

(bits to symbols)Pulse

Shaping

To RF subsection

BPSK, QPSK, 8-PSK

UncodedInformation

Bits

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

Implementation of both TX

Data Scrambler

BCCEncoder(k = 7)

Puncture InterleaveConstellation

Mapping(bits to symbols)

64-ptInverse

FFT

UncodedInformation

Bits

CyclicExtension

to80 samples

To RF subsection

(k = 7/9)

Cover Sequence

PulseShaping

To RF subsection

8-PSK

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

Implementation of both TX Approximate Relative Sizes

CyclicExtension

to80 samples(k = 7/9)

64-ptInverse

FFTTo RF

subsection

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE 802.11b transmitter Srikanth.

November 2001

Srikanth Gummadi, TI

doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/618r0

Submission

Summary• Proponents of CCK-OFDM

– PBCC at the TX comes for “free”– No known implementation of CCK-OFDM– No new clocking

• Proponents of PBCC– Need to incorporate the complex CCK-OFDM TX– Change to the existing chip is required– Complex clocking required (11 MHz -> 20 MHz)

• This potential consensus solution will provide the opportunity to allow the industry to move forward rapidly with a known direction