Do not look in the bag until you are asked to do so.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Do not look in the bag until you are asked to do so.
Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied
1 3 52 4
How do you feel about your collection of candy?
What is trade?
Exchange Exchange goods produced for goods not produced.
Specialization Diverting resources away from a competitive disadvantage toward a competitive advantage.
Country A
Hourly Wage $1
1 Food 40 Hours
1 Cloth 10 Hours
Cost of 1 Food $40
Cost of 1 Cloth $10
Country B
Hourly Wage
$20
1 Food
8 Hours
1 Cloth
4 Hours
Cost of 1 Food
$160
Cost of 1 Cloth
$80
Country A can produce both Food and Cloth at lower cost than can Country B.
A Tale of Two Countries
– 2 Cloth + 1 Food
To produce 1 more food, country A must give up 4 cloth.
– 4 Cloth + 1 Food
To produce 1 more food, country B must give up 2 cloth.
Country B has a comparative advantage in the production of food.
Country A has a comparative advantage in the production of cloth.
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country A wants 1 more Food. How can Country A get more Food?
1. Shift Resources
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country A wants 1 more Food. How can Country A get more Food?
2. Sell 3 Shirts on World Market for $150
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country A wants 1 more Food. How can Country A get more Food?
2. Buy 1 Food on World Market for $150
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country B wants more Cloth. How can Country B get more Cloth?
1. Shift Resources
2. Sell 1 Food on World Market for $150
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country B wants more Cloth. How can Country B get more Cloth?
2. Buy 3 Cloth on World Market for $150
Suppose that, on the world market, the price of Food is $150 and the price of Cloth is $50.
Country B wants more Cloth. How can Country B get more Cloth?
What Are the Benefits From Trade?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade leads to a centralization of political power, decreased competition, and the concentration of wealth.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade leads to a decentralization of political power, increased competition, and the dissemination of wealth.
What Is the Impact on Per-Capita Income?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade is exploitive of peoples and industries, therefore per-capita income will be lower for countries that trade more.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade is beneficial to both parties, therefore per-capita income will be higher for countries that trade more.
Per-Capita Income
R2 = 0.56
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000
Per-capita Income (US$)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)
Luxembourg
Belgium
IrelandNetherlands
JapanUS
Bahrain
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001
Per-Capita Income (Lower Middle, and Low Income)
R2 = 0.59
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500
Per-capita Income (US$)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)
Suriname
Lithuania
Samoa
Russia
ColombiaPeru
Guyana
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001
Per-Capita Income
Vietnam
Workers in foreign-owned apparel and footwear factories rank in the top 20% of wage earners.
Indonesia
In 2000, Nike paid $720 annually compared with an average annual country-wide wage of $241.
Mexico
Firms that exported most or all of their product paid wages 60% higher than wages of non-exporting firms.
Source: Brown, Drusilla K., Alan V. Deardorff, and Robert M. Stern, “The Effects of Multinational Production on Wages and Working Conditions in Developing Countries,” discussion paper no. 483, School of Public Policy, The University of Michigan, August 2002.
What Is the Impact on Income Distribution?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade consolidates income in the hands of the powerful, therefore countries that trade more will have a less equitable income distribution.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade disseminates income across trading partners, therefore countries that trade more will have a more equitable income distribution.
Income Distribution
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0
Gini Coefficient (0 = equitable, 100 = inequitable)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)
US
Switzerland
Ireland
Finland
Cyprus
Netherlands
Singapore
Hong Kong
Norway
DenmarkSwedenAustria
CanadaGermany
IsraelFrance
Slovenia
GabonSouth Africa
Malaysia
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and Measuring Income Inequality: A New Database, Deininger, Klaus, and Lyn Squire, World Bank, 2002
No carrot: A too inequitable distribution signals a lack of entrepreneurial opportunity.
No stick: A too equitable distribution signals no cost to free riders.
Income Distribution (Lower Middle, and Low Income)
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0
Gini Coefficient (0 = equitable, 100 = inequitable)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)
Thailand
Lithuania
Fiji
Ukraine
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and Measuring Income Inequality: A New Database, Deininger, Klaus, and Lyn Squire, World Bank, 2002
What Is the Impact on Health?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade exploits labor, therefore countries that trade more will have lower health measures.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade empowers labor, therefore countries that trade more will have greater health measures.
Life Expectancy
R2 = 0.59
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Life Expectancy (years)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$, l
og
arit
hm
ic s
cale
)
USBotswana
India
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
R2 = 0.51
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Life Expectancy (years)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)Life Expectancy (Low Middle, and Low Income)
India
Sierra Leone
Congo
Lesotho
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Infant Mortality
R2 = 0.79
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0
Infant Mortality (per 1,000 live births)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$, l
og
arit
hm
ic s
cale
)
US Gabon
Botswana
South Africa
Ivory Coast
Azerbaijan
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Caloric Intake
R2 = 0.60
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Daily per capita Supply of Calories
Pe
r-c
ap
ita
Tra
de
(U
S$
, lo
ga
rith
mic
sc
ale
)
Myanmar
US
Hong Kong
recommended
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Protein Intake
R2 = 0.59
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Daily per capita Supply of Protein (grams)
Pe
r-c
ap
ita
Tra
de
(U
S$
, lo
ga
rith
mic
sc
ale
)
US
recommended
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
What Is the Impact on the Environment?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade exploits the environment.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade encourages protection of the environment.
Deforestation
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
-3.0% -1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 9.0%
Average Annual Rate of Deforestation (1990-1995)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$)
US
Ireland
Armenia
Lebanon
Jamaica
Malaysia
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
73% of countries with above median trade have rates of deforestation below the median.
What Is the Impact on Social Equality?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade exploits the weak.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade empowers all.
Female Adult Literacy (relative to male)
R2 = 0.41
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Female Adult Literacy Rate (relative to male)
Pe
r-c
ap
ita
Tra
de
(U
S$
, lo
ga
rith
mic
sc
ale
)
Yemen
Oman
Morocco
Libya
Myanmar
Haiti
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Gender Related Development Index
R2 = 0.80
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Gender Related Development Index (0 = low gender adjusted HDI, 1 = high gender adjusted HDI)
Pe
r-c
ap
ita
Tra
de
(U
S$
, lo
ga
rith
mic
sc
ale
)
US
Myanmar
OmanBotswana
Ivory Coast
Azerbaijan and Albania
GDI measures equality of quality of life (longevity, education, literacy, income).
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Gender Empowerment Measure
R2 = 0.58
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Gender Empowerment Measure (0 = low empowerment, 1 = high empowerment)
Pe
r-c
ap
ita
Tra
de
(U
S$
, lo
ga
rith
mic
sc
ale
)
GEM measures the proportion of women in legislatures, among senior officials, and holding technical and management positions as well as gender differences in income (as a proxy for economic power)
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Child Labor
R2 = 0.54
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
0 10 20 30 40 50
Children 10 to 14 in the Labor Force (as % of age group)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$, l
og
arit
hm
ic s
cale
)
US
Hong Kong
Sierra LeoneBurundi
GabonBotswana
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and World Development Indicators, World Bank, 2002
Human Development Index
R2 = 0.80
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Human Development Index (0 = low human development, 1 = high human development)
Per
-cap
ita
Tra
de
(US
$, l
og
arit
hm
ic s
cale
)
Source: International Financial Statistics, International Monetary Fund, December 2001, and Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme, 2002
What Is the Impact on Unemployment?
Protectionist Assumption:
Trade destroys jobs.
Globalist Assumption:
Trade creates jobs.
Unemployment vs. Trade Over Time
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Bureau of Economic Analysis
January 1975 to June 2006
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30%
Trade (imports plus exports) as % of GDP
Un
emp
loym
ent
Rat
e
Unemployment vs. Trade Over Time
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Bureau of Economic Analysis
January 1975 to June 2006
$12.00
$12.50
$13.00
$13.50
$14.00
$14.50
$15.00
12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30%
Trade (imports plus exports) as % of GDP
Av
era
ge
Re
al H
ou
rly
Ea
rnin
gs
(2
00
0$
)
What About Outsourcing?
Protectionist Assumption:
Outsourcing puts Americans out of work.
Globalist Assumption:
Outsourcing is trade (of labor), and trade is beneficial.
Outsourcing (2002)
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
Ger
man
y
US
Japa
n
Net
herla
nds
Ital
y
Fra
nce
UK
Indi
a
Chi
na
Rus
sia
Bil
lio
ns
curr
ent
$
Source: Balance of Payment Statistics Yearbook, IMF
Outsourcing as Fraction of GDP (2002)
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Ang
ola
Con
go (
Rep
. of
)
Moz
ambi
que
Irel
and
Van
uatu
Indi
a
Ger
man
y
Rus
sia
Fra
nce
UK
Chi
na
Japa
n
US
Bil
lio
ns
curr
ent
$
Source: Balance of Payment Statistics Yearbook, IMF
Insourcing less Outsourcing (2002)
($15,000)
($10,000)
($5,000)
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
UK
US
Hon
g K
ong
Indi
a
Sin
gapo
re
Chi
na
Fra
nce
Rus
sia
Ital
y
Kor
ea
Indo
nesi
a
Japa
n
Ger
man
y
Bil
lio
ns
curr
ent
$
Source: Balance of Payment Statistics Yearbook, IMF