DMTD Assignment
-
Upload
elaine-lala -
Category
Documents
-
view
325 -
download
14
Transcript of DMTD Assignment
![Page 1: DMTD Assignment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082201/5695cfdf1a28ab9b028fe876/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/23/2019 DMTD Assignment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dmtd-assignment 1/3
Design Methods - CT015-3.5-2 Page 1 of 3
Learning Outcome:
1. Introduce the fundamental design concepts and design notations using M!.
2. nderstand the fundamentals of "#$ect "riented %oft&are !ife C'cle and appl' the
(no&ledge #' creating full-fledged computer program.
3. Design) implement and document appropriatel' efficient algorithm using M!.
Marking Criteria
This indi*idual assignment contri#utes 100+ of the total mar( for the module incourse.
%tudents are re,uired to produce a solution in the form of M! models pertaining to selected
s'stem and the criteria used to e*aluate the assignment are as follo&s
Item Marks%oft&are De*elopment Model &ith ustification 10+
/nal'sis Model
• The structure of the s'stem or application that 'ou are
modelling.
• It consists of M! diagrams that descri#e the logical
implementation of the functional re,uirements that 'ou
identified in the use case model.
0+
Design Model
• uilds on the anal'sis model #' descri#ing) in greater detail)
the structure of the s'stem and ho& the s'stem &ill #e
implemented.
0+
Presentation
• /#ilit' to ans&er ,uestions addressed #' the lecturer
pertaining to the &or( done and presented
10+
Total 100+
!e*el 2 /sia Pacific ni*ersit' of Technolog' and Inno*ation
![Page 2: DMTD Assignment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082201/5695cfdf1a28ab9b028fe876/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/23/2019 DMTD Assignment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dmtd-assignment 2/3
Design Methods - CT015-3.5-2 Page 2 of 3
Performance Criteria:
/ 0+ 4or( of distinguished ,ualit') demonstrating authoritati*e grasp of
soft&are modelling techni,ues) and the candidate has the a#ilit' to
effecti*el' design solution model for the pro#lem contet and document
the solution &ith M! *isualisation mechanism.
/ 65-67+ Demonstration of *er' high understanding of soft&are modelling s(ills
and candidate &as a#le to achie*e good design methods for the solution
and document it in a good presentation manner using M!.
60-6+ The designed solution model demonstrates good understanding of
soft&are modelling techni,ues and candidate &as a#le to de*elop good
design methods that are rele*ant to each specific modularised pro#lem
and document it in a good presentation manner using M!.
85+-87+ Demonstration of a#o*e a*erage understanding of soft&are modelling
and design methods. Candidate &as a#le to sho& that she9he had the
a#ilit' to de*elop good solution that is rele*ant to the pro#lem contet.
:o&e*er) the documentation ma' #e lac(ing in an in-depth discussion of
the designed solution model.
C 80+-8+ Demonstration of a#o*e a*erage understanding of soft&are modelling
and design methods. Candidate &as a#le to sho& that she9he had the
a#ilit' to de*elop accepta#le le*el of solution that is rele*ant to the
pro#lem contet. :o&e*er) the documentation ma' #e lac(ing in an in-
depth discussion of the designed solution model.
C 55+-57+ The designed solution demonstrated an understanding of soft&are
modelling and design methods. There is structure in the documentation
and there are no serious omissions or irrele*ancies. Detail le*el of
re,uirement &as limited.
%'stem design documentation is #asic #ut does not document an' in-
depth details of the solution design.
C- 50+-5+ asic design for the solution. Model ha*e essential diagrams onl' #ut
ma' #e fla&ed #' omissions and9or irrele*ancies. %'stem design
documentation is #asic and ma' contain minor omissions9mista(es.
; 0+-7+ 4ea( program design. Model ha*e onl' a fe& essential diagrams onl'.
%'stem design documentation is a*aila#le #ut has *er' little resem#lance
to actual implementation.
; 0-37+ <er' poor program design. Model ha*e no diagrams and do not meet the
epected re,uirements of the pro#lem scenario in the assignment.
%'stem design documentation is not a*aila#le.
!e*el 2 /sia Pacific ni*ersit' of Technolog' and Inno*ation
![Page 3: DMTD Assignment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082201/5695cfdf1a28ab9b028fe876/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/23/2019 DMTD Assignment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dmtd-assignment 3/3
Design Methods - CT015-3.5-2 Page 3 of 3
MARKING SCHEME
Student Name:
Student I:
S!stem "it#e:
CriteriaE$ce##ent Good A%erage Poor
&er!
Poor
1. %oft&are De*elopment
Model =10+> '()* + ,(- . )(/
2. Correctness of /nal'sis
Model =0+> /)(.* 0-(/* 0)(0, )-(0* )(),
3. Correctness of Design
Model =0+>
/)(.* 0-(/* 0)(0, )-(0* )(),
. Presentation =10+> '()* + ,(- . )(/
"O"AL:
End of ocument
!e*el 2 /sia Pacific ni*ersit' of Technolog' and Inno*ation