DLAMCrystalBridges

29
A RANDOM ASSIGNMENT EVALUATION OF SCHOOL VISITS TO AN ART MUSEUM JAY P. GREENE BRIAN KISIDA DAN BOWEN UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS Learning from Crystal Bridges

Transcript of DLAMCrystalBridges

A R A N D O M A S S I G N M E N T E V A L U A T I O N O F S C H O O L V I S I T S T O A N A R T M U S E U M

J A Y P . G R E E N EB R I A N K I S I D A

D A N B O W E N

U N I V E R S I T Y O F A R K A N S A S

Learning from Crystal Bridges

Motivations for Research

Culturally enriching field trips have a long tradition in public education, but are recently in decline because of budgetary constraints

focus on core subject instruction to maximize performance on high stakes exams

shift to “reward” field trips

What is lost when enriching field trips are cut?

Can we expand the measures of educational outcomes to capture the role of the arts and cultural institutions?

Study Overview

The opening of Crystal Bridges presented a one of a kind opportunity to learn about the effects of school visits to an art museum:

Most area students had never been to an art museum

Heavy demand made random assignment possible

Random assignment is the “gold-standard” in evaluation research; clearly isolates causal impact

Study Overview

Crystal Bridges is the first major art museum built in four decades

Over $800 million endowment, including resources for school tours

In total, 525 K-12 school groups with 38,347 students applied

Applicants were organized into matched pairs

Pairs randomly assigned to treatment and control

Pairs randomly ranked to fill available spots

95 applicants awarded tours (treatment group) and 95 applicants

awarded deferred tours (control group)

Data collected from 174 applicant groups (80 matched pairs) on

average 3 weeks after tour

Enormous Effort

174 applicant groups

123 schools

11,973 miles driven

10,912 students surveyed

489 teachers surveyed

531,781 bits of data

Study Overview: Student Sample

Grade Treatment N Control N Total N

Kindergarten 305 18 323

1st grade 506 634 1,140

2nd grade 624 536 1,160

3rd grade 363 917 1,280

4th grade 924 533 1,457

5th grade 656 1106 1,762

6th grade 635 723 1,358

7th grade 470 243 713

8th grade 204 298 502

9th grade 96 108 204

10th grade 116 276 392

11th grade 147 171 318

12th grade 148 155 303

Total 5,194 5,718 10,912

Study Overview: Student Sample

Student Characteristics Treatment Control Total

Females (K-12 sample) 50.6 50.8 50.7

Ethnicity (3-12 sample)

Hispanic 18.8 18.6 18.7

White 59.3 60.2 59.8

Native American 6.6 5.3 5.8

Black 2.8 3.8 3.3

Marshallese 1.8 2.5 2.2

Asian or Pacific Islander 3.3 2.8 3.0

Mixed race 5.1 4.6 4.8

Other/Unknown 2.3 2.3 2.3

Data Analysis

Estimate of mean differences using the following equation for outcome Y of student i in matched pair m

Yim = α + β1Treati + β2Matchim + εim

This basic regression model is improved by adding controls for observable characteristics

Yim = α + β1Treati + β2Matchim + β3Femalei + β4Gradei + εim

Subgroup effects are estimated with indicator variables and an interaction term where S indicates that a student is a member of a particular subgroup:

Yim = α + β1Treati + β2Matchim + β3Femalei + β4Gradei + β5Si + β6 Si*Treati + εim

Summary of Findings

Students who won the lottery and received a school tour of Crystal Bridges are significantly more likely to:

Recall school visit themes

Demonstrate stronger critical thinking skills

Display higher tolerance

Exhibit greater historical empathy

Develop a taste for art museums and cultural institutions

Benefits are generally significantly larger for disadvantaged students (minority, low-income, or rural schools)

Rural Schools

Rural Schools

Rural Schools

81.7%***

90.5%***

59.9%

66.6%

0% 50% 100%

What does this painting show?

What is the name of this painting?

Control Treatment

What is the name of this painting?

Recalling Themes

Painting C is showing… the importance of women entering the workforce during World War II.

80.5%***

79.2%***

49.4%

27.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

What does this painting s

plowing it under

Control Treatment

Painting C is showing…An African-American perspective of real and idealized visions of the American dream?

Recalling Themes

Why do you think this man is plowing under his crop rather than harvesting it?

87.9%***

94.1%***

30.0%

45.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

johnson

Control Treatment

Painting B is showing… abolitionists making maple syrup to undermine the sugar made from slave labor.

Recalling Themes

Painting A is showing… a community in transition to a more industrial lifestyle, from wood-burning to coal-burning.

Thinking Critically about Art

What do you think is going on in this painting?

What do you see that makes you think that?

Scored on 7 Item Rubric

Observing

Interpreting

Evaluating

Associating

Problem Finding

Comparing

Flexible Thinking

Thinking Critically About Art

Group Effect Size Group Effect Size

Full Sample +9.1%**

Smaller Towns +33.4%*** Larger Towns +2.5%

> 40 Minutes +33.6%*** < 40 Minutes +1.0%

Higher Poverty +17.9%*** Lower Poverty -1.5%

First Visit +16.6%***

Tolerance

Survey items included in scale

People who disagree with my point of view bother me.

Artists whose work is critical of America should not be allowed to have their work shown in art museums.

I appreciate hearing views different from my own.

I think people can have different opinions about the same thing.

Tolerance

Group Effect Size Group Effect Size

Full Sample +6.8%**

Smaller Towns +13.3%*** Larger Towns +2.8%

> 40 Minutes +16.8%*** < 40 Minutes +2.6%

Higher Poverty +9.2%** Lower Poverty +0.8%

First Visit +4.0%

“Artists whose work is critical of America should not be allowed to have their work shown in art museums.”

Group Treatment Control Difference

Full Sample 31.9% 34.7% -2.8%***

Smaller Towns 30.2% 33.9% -3.6%*

Larger Towns 33.0% 35.2% -2.2%*

> 40 Minutes 28.1% 34.4% -6.3%**

< 40 Minutes 33.7% 34.9% -1.2%

Higher Poverty 31.6% 37.0% -5.3%***

Lower Poverty 33.2% 29.8% +3.3%***

First Visit 34.5% 35.8% -1.4%

Historical Empathy

Survey items included in scale

I have a good understanding of how early Americans thought and felt.

I can imagine what life was like for people 100 years ago.

When looking at a painting that shows people, I try to imagine what those people are thinking.

Historical Empathy

Group Effect Size Group Effect Size

Full Sample +5.9%**

Smaller Towns +15.0%*** Larger Towns +0.2%

> 40 Minutes +13.8%*** < 40 Minutes +0.6%

Higher Poverty +4.6% Lower Poverty +7.6%

First Visit +12.2%***

“I have a good understanding of how early Americans thought and felt.”

Group Treatment Control Difference

Full Sample 69.7% 65.5% +4.1%***

Smaller Towns 68.8% 61.8% +7.0%***

Larger Towns 70.3% 68.0% +2.3%*

> 40 Minutes 71.0% 63.7% +7.3%***

< 40 Minutes 69.6% 67.1% +2.6%

Higher Poverty 69.7% 66.5% +3.1%**

Lower Poverty 69.7% 63.5% +6.3%*

First Visit 69.3% 63.4% +5.9%***

Cultivating a Taste for Art Museums

Survey items included in scale

I plan to visit art museums when I am an adult.

I would tell my friends they should visit an art museum.

Trips to art museums are interesting.

Trips to art museums are fun.

Would your friend like to go to an art museum on a field trip?

Would you like more museums in your community?

How interested are you in visiting art museums?

If your friends or family wanted to go to an art museum, how interested would you be in going?

Cultivating a Taste for Art Museums

Group Effect Size Group Effect Size

Full Sample +8.0%**

Smaller Towns +22.4%*** Larger Towns +1.6%

> 40 Minutes +20.7%*** < 40 Minutes +2.7%

Higher Poverty +11.0%*** Lower Poverty +4.0%

First Visit +16.8%***

“I would tell my friends they should visit an art museum.”

Group Treatment Control Difference

Full Sample 69.8% 65.7% +4.1%***

Smaller towns 72.5% 62.6% +9.9%***

Larger towns 68.5% 67.1% +1.5%

> 40 Minutes 74.3% 65.1% +9.2%***

< 40 Minutes 67.9% 66.1% +1.9%

Higher Poverty 73.7% 67.6% +6.1%***

Lower Poverty 63.4% 62.2% +1.1%

First Visit 70.1% 63.5% +6.6%***

Behavioral Measure

Treatment Observed Rate

Treatment Expected Rate

Treatment Effect

Total People 57.8% 48.8% +9.0%***

Adults 58.0% 48.8% +9.2%***

Students 57.4% 48.8% +8.6%**

Policy Implications

Visits to cultural institutions have significant benefits for students.

Policymakers need to ensure that schools have resources to take their students on tours of cultural institutions.

School administrators need to decide to use their resources and time for these tours.

Philanthropists need to build and maintain these cultural institutions with quality educational programs.

We need more rigorous research on the effects of culturally enriching experiences on students.

Other Projects

Walton Arts Center

Evaluation of cumulative effect of field trips on students

Museum of Discovery

Measuring effect of field trips on student desire to consume and produce science as well as their factual knowledge about science

Crystal Bridges 2.0

Examination of “spill-over” benefits of school tours on community attendance at museum

Long term evaluation of virtual education program targeted toward rural students