Diversity as a Competitive Advantage: Starting with the Facts Women, Law & Leadership: The IndyBar...
-
Upload
ashlyn-morgan -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Diversity as a Competitive Advantage: Starting with the Facts Women, Law & Leadership: The IndyBar...
Diversity as a Competitive Advantage:Starting with the Facts
Women, Law & Leadership:The IndyBar Women & the Law
Division Symposium
Diversity in Law Firms
1. Variations by Geography– Minorities do make partner … just not
everywhere.
2. Individual success within an organization – lessons for diverse lawyers
3. Organizational Success based on diversity– E.g., team-based project management.
1. Variations by GeographySample: 2005-06 NALP Directory of Legal Employers
• Office level data of 613 law firm employers in 108 metropolitan areas– Aggregate firm data of non-regional firms was excluded– 1445 discrete offices; 878 offices (60.8%) are Am Law 200 firms– In 2004, offices hired 6020 entry level associates (15.5% of all 2004 JD
graduates) and 1049 judicial clerks.
• Office level data broken down by:– Job title, race, gender, disabled and openly gay.– Summer associate, entry-level, and judicial clerk hiring– Weighted average starting salary = $115,620
1. Variations by GeographyGender
NYC, DC, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, and Foreign offices comprise:
53.9% of all attorneys
47.3% of all female partners
61.3% of all female associates
1. Variations by Geography Concentrations of Black Lawyers
DC, Atlanta, Southeast
22.5% of all attorneys
38.9% of all Black partners
33.82% of all Black associates
Southeast, Houston, Dallas, LA
18.7% of all attorneys
43.7% of all Hispanic Partners
31.9% of all Hispanic associates
1. Variations by Geography Concentrations of Hispanic Lawyers
1. Variations by Geography Concentrations of Asian Lawyers
LA, San Francisco, Rocky & West
17.5% of all attorneys
46.8% of all Asian partners
33.4% of all Asian associates
New York City CSA:
18.8% of lawyers
14.0% of all partners
12.1% female partners
23.0% female associates
10.2% of black partners
24.0% of black associates
13.7% of Asian Partners
32.0% of Asian Associates
12.4% of Hispanic Partners
25.6% of Hispanic Associates
1. Variations by Geography New York City
Key takeaway: NYC is highly heterogeneous at associate level but highly homogenous at the partnership level.
2. Individual Strategies for SuccessRobert Kelley’s Bell Labs Study
OrganizationE
CM
Stars
E = engineers
M = managers
C = clients
• “Star” theories fell into three categories:
– Cognitive abilities
– Social skills
– Psychological traits
NO RELATIONSHIP between these factors and status as a star performer
2. Individual Strategies for SuccessRobert Kelley’s Bell Labs Study
Work Strategies of Stars
1. Initiative2. Networking 3. Self-Management4. Perspective5. Followership6. Teamwork7. Leadership8. Organizational Savvy9. Show-and-tell
Organizational Savvy Show-and-tell
Initiative Networking Self-Management Perspective Followership Teamwork Leadership
Strategies of Average Performers
2. Individual Strategies for SuccessRobert Kelley’s Bell Labs Study
2. Individual Strategies for SuccessRobert Kelley’s Bell Labs Study
Key finding:
Under the resulting training program, women and minority knowledge workers experienced the largest gains in productivity – four times larger than their white, male counterparts
2. Individual Strategies for SuccessWhose Network is better, Richard’s or Susan’s?
See Rob Cross, The Most Valuable People in Your Network, HBR Blog Network (2011)
3. Organizational Strategies for Success
Diverse groups are more innovative and creative than homogeneous groups
•Viewpoint diversity is key•Requires trust
3. Organizational Strategies for Success
In measuring Group IQ and Group Performance, number of women is a key predictor …
“What do you hear about great groups? Not that the members are all really smart but that they listen to each other. They share criticism constructively. They have open minds. They’re not autocratic. And in our study we saw pretty clearly that groups that had smart people dominating the conversation were not very intelligent groups.”
Anita Woolley & Thomas Malone What Makes a Team Smarter? More Women (June 2011)