District Improvement Plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 District Improvement Plan 2011-2012

1/24

DistrictImprovement

Plan2011 2012


2/24

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at thesatisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Dr. Bobby Burns, Superintendent


3/24

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Nancy Cline, PresidentJames Goode, Vice PresidentRichard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant SecretaryFrank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board MemberKarin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERSBRANCH SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

CreekviewEarly CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

BlalackBushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES

Supporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement


Continuously improve the learning environmentfor students and staff


Continuously increase operationaleffectiveness


Continuously increase stakeholder confidenceand support of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

BlairBlanton

CarrolltonCentral

Country PlaceDavis

Farmers BranchFreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorter

RainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

StarkStricklandThompson

CENTERS

Mary Grimes Education CenterSalazar Transition School

Kelly Pre-K CenterHuie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOAL

The Goal of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD is high

achievement for all students.


4/24

DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES

Jose CastanonJane DarlingCheryl BogartRachel LewisRon Branson

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES

Minerva GomezDara WolfeMarissa BanksLuke ErlenbuschMelinda Grandell

Stephanie HerpinChip WoodBrent D. Webb

ADMINISTRATORS

Dr. Bobby Burns, SuperintendentDr. Sheila Maher, Associate Superintendent

Mark Hyatt, Associate SuperintendentHolly Barber, Executive Director of Curriculum and Staff DevelopmentTracy Smith, Executive Director of School ImprovementGerry Charlebois, Executive Director of Advanced Academic ServicesJo Gillen, Executive Director of CTE/CounselingRandi Wells, Executive Director of Special EducationBonnie Halsey, Executive Director of FinanceCindy Randle, Executive Director of Strategic Communication ServicesDr. Andy Berning, Chief Information Technology OfficerMary Hopkins, Executive Director Personnel

STAFF REPRESENTATIVES

ELEMENTARY

Iris Ramos, BlairLaDonna Castilla, BlantonJolene Wasilewski, Carrollton

Lori Canales, CentralSherry Cox, Country PlaceDiana Drake, DavisSusan Machayo,

Farmers BranchPam Spencer, FreemanPeggy Collins, FurneauxDawn Mason, GoodPat Thorpe, Kent

Rolanda Williams, LandryMarlana Dumas, Las ColinasCheryl Huff, LaVillitaMargaret Hunley, McCoyBridget OConnor, McKamyTasha Wilks, McLaughlinTu Lam, McWhorterPaul Morrison, RainwaterBrittney Manuel, RiverchaseShanah Brown, RosemeadeJonna Plumlee,

Sheffield IntermediateLiza Flores, Sheffield PrimarySara Kreymer, StarkBriannah Thomas, StricklandCourtney Wilson, Thompson

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Kent Trulsson, BlalackJames Henneke, BushErin Appling, Field

Veronica Rolen, LongCharlene Stansberry, PerryMichelle Bailey, PolkMatthew Pruitt, Polk

HIGH SCHOOLS

Joe LaPuma, Creekview

Dina Anderson,Early College

Lori Mehnert, GrimesHeather Davis, RanchviewCarly Williams, SmithMartin Wesley, Turner

CENTERS

Paula Brown, SalazarCindy Nietubicz, TLCDixie Pennington, HuieJudy Seale, Kelly Pre-K


5/24

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory oradvanced level and graduate college-ready and/orworkforce ready without remediation.

MISSION

Together with families and community we commit alldistrict resources to guide the learning of each student to

graduate as: A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFS

We believe that: The economic, political and societal success of

our country depends upon a quality educationfor all.

Diversity strengthens the community andenriches the fabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and

nurturing environment. Belonging to a family, to a school and to a

community is vital, and this sense of belongingadvances learning.

People learn at different rates, have differentcapacities and that each persons educationalpath deserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, and

emotionally Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILE

Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who: Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical

behavior

Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who: Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options

Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who: Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who: Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly


6/24

TARGET AREAS

Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I District Components (TD)

TD 1. Comprehensive needs assessment

TD 2. School-wide reform strategiesTD 3. Highly qualified teachersTD 4. Professional developmentTD 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTD 6. Parental involvementTD 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTD 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TD 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTD 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.


7/24

Strategic Improvement Plan

2011-2014

District Goal: High Achievement for All Students Supporting Objective 1: Continuously improve student achievement

Data Source(s): Education Resource Group (ERG); AEIS ERG ranks the largest 200 school districts in Texas based on their EPI (EducationProductivity Index), which is determined by academic and financial metrics referred to as API (Academic Performance Index) and FPI (FinancialPerformance Index). Through linear regression, ERG compares a districts deviation from their expected score rather than absolute scores in order to takeinto account the impact economically disadvantaged students typically have on absolute scores allowing district comparisons regardless of the district'spercentage of economically disadvantaged students. The API is calculated using performance on TAKS tests, 4 year graduation rates, and collegeadmission tests (SAT and ACT) while the FPI is based on operational efficiency.

Performance Measure2010

Results2011

Target2011

Results2012

Target2012

Results2013

Target2013

Results2014

Target2014

ResultsAcademic Performance Index (API) 17 15 10 5 1

Recognized/Exemplary District(Designated Distinction 2013-14) R R R N/A R R ERecognized/Exemplary Campuses(Designated Distinction 2013-2014)

34/38

89%37/37

100%31/37

84% N/A31/37

84%35/37

95%37/37

100%District Met Adequately YearlyProgress AYP (Yes or No) Y Y N Y Y YSchools Met Adequately YearlyProgress AYP (% of schools)

37/38

97%37/37

100%33/37

89%37/37

100%37/37

100%37/37

100%


8/24


2011-2014

District Goal: High Achievement for All Students Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Data Source(s): C-FB Texas Association of School Boards Employee Opinion Survey Results; AEIS


Results2011

Target2011

Results2012

Target2012

Results2013

Target2013

Results2014

Target2014

ResultsEmployee Job Satisfaction I wouldrecommend this district to a friend as a goodplace to work.

93% 95% 92% 94% 97% 98%

Employee Working Conditions Ihave the equipment, tools, and supplies to besuccessful in my job.

93% 95% 95% 97% 97% 97%

Employee Compensation & BenefitsOverall, I am satisfied with the pay andbenefits offered by the district.

77% 80% 81% 85% 88% 90%

Student Attendance Rate 95.8% 96% 96% 97% 97% 98%Students with DisciplinaryPlacements

13.4%(08-09)

13%(09-10)

12.5%(10-11)

12.5%(11-12)

12%(12-13)


9/24


2011-2014

District Goal: High Achievement for All Students Supporting Objective 3: Continuously improve operational effectiveness

Data Source(s): Education Resource Group (ERG)


Results2011

Target2011

Results2012

Target2012

Results2013

Target2013

Results2014

Target2014

ResultsFinancial Performance Index (FPI) 49 40 30 25 20

District Goal: High Achievement for All Students Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Data Source(s): Education Resource Group (ERG); C-FB Texas Association of School Boards Employee Opinion Survey Results; AchievingQuality Together District Survey


Results

2011

Target

2011

Results

2012

Target

2012

Results

2013

Target

2013

Results

2014

Target

2014

ResultsEducation Productivity Index (EPI) 11 10 9 8 7Employee District Communications

The district has my confidence and support. 94% 96% 93% 95% 95% 97%

Achieving Quality Together ParentSurvey Satisfied with school district 91.8* 94% 88.6% 90% 92% 95%*Survey completed at elementary level only


10/24

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR

STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE

AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOLSYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API) STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced Graduation Rate SAT Mean ACT Mean

Recognized Distinction Designation

AYP


Employee Job Satisfaction Working Conditions Compensation and Benefits

Student: Attendance Rate

Disciplinary Placements


Financial Performance Index (FPI) Instructional Services Leadership Services Student Services Non Student Services Operating Services


Education Productivity Index (EPI) API FPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee District Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS


11/24



CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT

CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND

STAFF


CONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND

SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized Distinction Designation; AYP

ACTION STRATEGYPERSON

RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Expand Instructional Rounds Sheila MaherAugust 2011-

April 2012

STAAR; MAP; Survey

Data

Staff TimeTitle II forTeacher

Substitutes -$24,000

TA 3, 4

TD 2, 4, 7

2. Pilot updated Grading ProceduresSheila MaherHolly Barber

August 2011-June 2012

STARR; MAP; SAT;Graduation Rate;Survey Data

Staff TimeTA 1, 3TD 2, 8, 9

3. Implement Readers/WritersWorkshop at the secondary level.

Shirley WrightErica Ysbrand


STAAR Reading/ELAData; ClassroomObservations

Title II forTeacherSubstitutes-$15,000

TA 1, 2, 3, 6,8TD 1, 2, 4, 10

4. Strengthen the instructionalinfrastructure at the secondary level.

Sheila MaherAugust 2011-June 2012

Proposal submitted toSuperintendent byApril 1, 2012

Staff TimeTD 1, 2, 4, 9,10

5. Design and monitor actions plans forthe District and schools to meet AYP.

Sheila MaherTracy SmithTanya GarveyShirley WrightRandi Wells


District and all schoolsmeet AYP

TA 1, 2, 3, 4TD 1, 2, 9, 10

6. Develop leadership capacitythroughout the District Sheila Maher August 2011-June 2012

Instructional Rounds

trainingCoaching for ResultsTregoe trainingAPI

Title II$58,500

TA 3, 4, 5, 6TD 2, 3, 4, 9

7. Focus on Expectations for Instructionand Learning; Progress Monitoring

Sheila MaherTracy Smith


Principal campusvisits

TA 1, 2, 8TD 2, 7, 8, 9,10

8. Implement a plan to ensurecompliance with TEA Guidelines forparticipation requirements by ARDCommittees making STAAR Modifieddecisions

Randi WellsAugust 2011 June

2012

Implementation ofplan/ARD CommitteeData

Staff training,campus visits,

campus/ARDdata collection

TA 1, 2, 3, 7TD 1, 2, 3, 4,6, 10


12/24





STAFF







RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

9. Implement plan to increase thegraduation rate for students in

special education

Randi WellsAugust 2011 June2012

ERG Data

CampusGraduationTeam

Meetings

TA 1, 2, 4, 6,7TD 1, 2, 4, 6,

9, 1010. Increase performance on the State

Assessment for students in specialeducation by promoting andmonitoring the use ofaccommodations in the generaleducation setting

Randi WellsAugust 2011 June2012

STAARStaff Time,Staff Training

TA 1, 2, 3, 4,6TD 2, 4, 9

11. Build Authentic Literacy in the Social

Studies Classroom: ThinkingThrough the End of Your Pencil EVERY DAY!

Pier Larsen August 2011-June 2012

STAAR Social Studies

Data; ClassroomObservations

Title II fundsfor subs -

SmokeyDaniels onOctober 4 -$9,000

TA 1, 2, 6TD 2, 4, 9

12. Implement new COL units of studyfor reading, writing, and wordstudy at elementary level/coaching

Susan KellyAugust 2011-June 2012

STAARReading/WritingClassroomobservations

TA 1, 3, 6TD 1, 2, 4, 9

13. Provide training and implementation

for CME Algebra I curriculum/Coaching

Tanya Garvey.

Pam Smith

August 2011-

June 2012

STAAR EOC;

ClassroomObservations

Title II for PD-

$21,000

TA 1, 3, 6

TD 1, 2, 4, 9

14. Implement Professional LearningCommunities and Coaching at theElementary and Middle Schoollevels.

Pam Smith August 2011-2012STAAR Math Data;MAP Data, ClassroomObservations

Staff Time;Title II for PD$20,550

TA 3, 5TD 2, 4, 9


13/24





STAFF







RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT15. Learn with and through others

PD/PLC to guide and support IIPprocess

Coaching Science accountable discussion

and writing Skilled Questioning Conference for the Advancement

of Science Teaching Online training for Science

Supplemental Materials

Susan ShippAugust 2011-May 2012

ClassroomobservationsUnit test dataSTAAR Data

Science

SpecialistDistrictsciencecurriculumMACH BTitle II$12,000

TA 3, 5TD 2, 4, 9

16. Monitor student learning by providing

fair assessments as part of theStandards-Based InstructionalSystem.

Susan Shipp August 2011-May 2012

Unit tests

Measure of AcademicProgress (MAP)STAAR Data

District

sciencecurriculumMAP

TA 2, 6TD 4, 8, 9

17. Embed technology into classroominstruction where appropriate

Holly BarberAugust 2011- May2012

Principal feedbacksurveysTechnology LiteracyAssessments (gr. 5, 8)

InstructionalTechnologySpecialists,local funds

TA 1, TA3TD 2, 4

18. Provide intervention to acceleratereading levels of struggling students

Susan Kelly August 2011-2012Beginning of Year,Middle of Year, End of

Year reading levels

Title 1$426,382Title 2:$5,000

TA 1, 2, 3, 4,8

TD 2, 4, 9


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized Distinction Designation; AYP


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Use Readistep data to exploreinstructional plans.

Gerry CharleboisShirley Wright,

September 2011 May 2012

Improved SAT/ACTscores

TA 1TD 8, 10A


14/24





STAFF




Pam Smith


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Create a plan to address timelysafety nets at the high school level.

Sheila MaherProposal submittedby April 1, 2012

Implementation of thePlan; ImprovedGraduation Rate

RestructuredDistrictResources

TA 1, 2TD 1, 2, 9

2. Implement ninth grade graduationteams at the high school level.

Jo GillenAugust 2011- June2012

Improved GraduationRate

TA 1, 2TD 1, 2, 9


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Implement PSAT/SAT/ACT student

prep sessions: Revolution Prep &CFB Summer Prep Program

Gerry CharleboisSeptember 2011 July 2012

Improved SAT/ACTscores

$50,000TA 1TD 8, 10A

2. Increase participation in student

SAT/ACT programs by improvingcommunication and advocacy forSuperintendents 100.

Gerry Charlebois September 2011 July 2012

Increased number of

students participatingin prep programs

TA 1TD 8, 10A


15/24





STAFF




Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this district to a friend as a good place to work.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Provide professional development in

the foundation and enrichment

courses

Holly BarberAug. 2011 Aug.

2012

Number of sessions

and participants

Title II$44,700

Local funds

TA 6

TD 4

2. Provide instructional coaching andsupport from content specialists

Susan Kelly,Shirley Wright,Erica Ysbrand,Pam Smith, TanyaGarvey, SusanShipp

Aug. 2011 May2012

Increased jobsatisfaction

Title 1:$82,712Title 2:$15,000Title 3$333,785

TA 6TD 4, 5, 8

3. Provide modern technology tools toefficiently perform jobs

Andy BerningAug. 2011 May2012

Increased jobsatisfaction

4. Conduct an annual review of teachercompensation with selected districts

Mary HopkinsTrini Garza

September 2011-June 2012

Results of survey Current localresources

TA 5TD 3

5. Participate in the TASB survey onEmployee Job Satisfaction


October 2011 -February 2012

TASB survey resultsTitle II:$6,000

TA 5TD 3


Performance Target: Employee: Working Conditions I have the equipment, tools, and supplies to be successful in my job.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

1. Finalize implementation of anintegrated financial accounting andpersonnel software system toreplace a non-sustainable system.

Scott RoderickComplete andoperational byJanuary 1, 2012

Operational System

Initiated withbond fundswith finalconversioncompletedwithin localfunds.

TA 8TD 10

2. Implement a new work-ordermanagement system. Johnny Hibbs

Complete andoperational by Operational System

Local fundsand staff


16/24





STAFF




January 1, 2012

3. Upgrade computers, projectors, andwireless access in high schools

Andy Berning Spring 2012 Completion of project2003 bondfunds

TA 8TD 10


Performance Target: Employee: Compensation and Benefits Overall, I am satisfied with the pay and benefits offered by the district.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Compile a teacher attrition report of

top three reasons teachers left C-FBin 2010-11


October 2011-November 2011

Comparison ofattrition due to reason

Current localresources

TA 5TD 3

2. Survey selected districts on teacherattrition due to pay and benefits in2010-11


October 2011-June2012

Review of ERG dataon teacher attrition2010-11


TA 5TD 3

3. Participate in the TASB EmployeeJob Satisfaction Survey


Complete by May2012

Results from TASBEmployee JobSatisfaction Survey

Title II:$6,000 (fromabove)

TA 5TD 3

4. Utilize Gallup information to recruithighly qualified staff


May 2012Highly QualifiedReport

Title II:$34,000

TA 5TD 3


Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Utilize district-wide communication

system to update parents onstudents attendance

Mark Hyatt Throughout the yearIncreased studentattendance

TA 7TA 6


17/24





STAFF





Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Develop a plan to reduce disciplinary

placements in DAEP and JJAEP

Debby Millican PatFranklin and Pat

Hester

Fully implemented

August 1, 2012

Reduce DAEP andJJAEP placements

(target 10% reduction)

Current local

resources

TA3, 4, 7

2. Adopt new Student Code of Conduct Mark Hyatt September 2011Reduce disciplinaryplacements by 10%

3. Revise policy of personal learningdevices to provide flexibility forinstructional use.

Andy Berning September 2011Reduce disciplinaryplacements by 10%

4. Develop and implement strategieswhich foster a positive and safe

environment for students.

Jo Gillen December 2011

Reduction in dropoutsand disciplinereferrals; meeting

agendas, sign-insheets

Local budget

5. Train on the prevention of suicideand substance abuse.


Reduction in suicideattempts, dropouts,and disciplinereferrals; meetingagendas, sign-insheets

Local budget

6. Identify and guide students involvedin gang activity and those at risk ofdropping out of school


Reduction in dropouts

and disciplinereferrals; meetingagendas, sign-insheets

Local budget


18/24





STAFF




Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Financial Performance Index (FPI)


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Develop an operations plan to

address the budget circumstances of2012-13 Mark Hyatt June 1, 2012

Budget plan that willsustain operations

with availableresources

Current local

resources

TA8

TD 1, 10

2. Analyze data in ERGs FinancialPerformance Index for top tenranked districts for InstructionalServices.

Mark Hyatt June 1, 2012Recommendation planto increase efficiencysubmitted to Cabinet


3. Analyze data in ERGs FinancialPerformance Index for top tenranked districts for Leadership

Service.



4. Analyze data in ERGs FinancialPerformance Index for top tenranked districts for Student Services.



5. Analyze data in ERGs FinancialPerformance Index for top tenranked districts for Non-StudentServices.



6. Analyze data in ERGs Financial

Performance Index for top tenranked districts for OperatingServices.

Mark Hyatt June 1, 2012

Recommendation plan

to increase efficiencysubmitted to Cabinet



19/24





STAFF




Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI)


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Create the online annual report for

the 2010-2011 school year

Cindy RandleCompleted by

January 2012

Number of visits tosite each month after

launch

Staff Time

$10,0002. Build understanding of Education

Productivity Index (EPI) throughtraining Board of Trustees

Bobby BurnsSept. 22, 2011

Board feedback


Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Use the Blackboard Connect system

to contact parents regardingcampus and district activities.

PrincipalsStrategicCommunications

2011-2012 schoolyear

Number of phonescalled; number ofmessages sent

$64,000Staff time

TA 7TD 6

2. Distribute Bright Spots publication tostakeholders

Cindy Randle Throughout yearTA 7TD 6


Performance Target: Employee: District Communications The district has my confidence and support.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Conduct faculty visits by theDistricts leadership team

Bobby Burns 2011-2012Visits completed;Employee Survey

Results

Staff Time


20/24





STAFF




ERG Performance Index2010Rank

2011Target

2011Rank

2012Target

2012Rank

Education ProductivityIndex (EPI)

11 10 9

Academic PerformanceIndex (API)

17 15 10

Financial PerformanceIndex (FPI)

49 40 30

Employee Opinion Survey2011

Result2012

Target2012

Result

Employee Job Satisfaction I wouldrecommend this district to a friend as agood place to work.

92 94

Employee Working Conditions I havethe equipment, tools, and supplies tobe successful in my job.

95 97

Employee Compensation & Benefits Overall, I am satisfied with the pay andbenefits offered by the district.

81 85

Employee District Communications The district has my confidence andsupport.

93 95

AEIS2011

Result2012

Target2012

Result

Rating R NA R

Student Attendance Rate 96 97

Students with Disciplinary Placements

Achieving Quality Together (ParentSurvey)

2011Result

2012Target

2012Result

Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District 88.6 90

RESULTS - 2012

PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target


21/24





STAFF





READING/ELAREADING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

% SATIS % ADVStudent Group

%PASS Target Result

% COMTarget Result

Afr. American 90 92 28 33Hispanic 89 92 26 33White 97 97 48 48Econ. Dis. 89 92 26 33LEP 76 92 17 33G/T 99+ 99 74 74Special Ed 81 92 19 33All Students 92 92 33 33

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


%PASS Target Result

% COMTarget Result


SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012

% SATIS % ADVStudent Group %PASS Target Result

% COMTarget Result

Afr. American 96 97 44 54Hispanic 96 97 44 54White 99 99 74 74Econ. Dis. 95 97 44 54LEP 80 97 14 54G/T 100 100 93 93Special Ed 87 97 18 54All Students 97 97 54 54

MATHEMATICS

MATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012% SATIS % ADV

Student Group%

PASS Target Result% COM

Target Result


SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


%PASS Target Result

% COMTarget Result


RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

SATISFACTORY

ADVANCED# of Targets Met


Percent at Target

Note:2012TransitionyearfromTAKStoSTAAR:StandardsforSTAARwillnotbedetermineduntilfall2


22/24





STAFF





23/24





STAFF





COMPLETION RATE / GRADUATION RATEC-FBISD

Class of 2009 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012CompletionRate

Completion Rate Graduation Rate Completion Rate Graduation Rate

Student Group

CompRate

GraduationRate

CompRate

GraduationRate

Target Results Target Results Target Results Target Results

Afr. American 92.7 82.9 96.6 87.5 97 89

Hispanic 92.2 77.1 92.5 81.5 93 83

White 95.3 90.6 95.6 92.9 97 94

Econ. Dis. 93.7 83.8 93.8 87.4 94 89

All Students 94.1 84.5 94.7 87.3 95 90

Dropout RateANNUAL DROPOUT RATE

GRADES 7-8C-FBISD 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Student Group Rate Rate Target Results

Afr. American 1.1 .1 .1

Hispanic .5 .1 .1

White .4 .1 .1

Econ. Dis. .2 0 0

All Students .6 .1 .1

RESULTS - 2012

PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETSCompletion Dropout

# of Targets Met


Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Met AYP2008 Y

2009 Y

2010 Y

2011 N

Target 2012 Y

Results 2012


24/24





STAFF





C-FBISD SAT MEAN SCORES2012

Subtests 2009 2010 2011Target Results

Critical Reading 497 488 485 497

Mathematics 533 519 513 521

Writing 489 482 478 489

CombinedScore

1519 1489 1476 1507

Percent Tested 43% 47% 53% 55%

C-FBISD ACT MEAN SCORES2012Subtests 2009 2010 2011 Target Results

English 20.0 20.2 20.5 21

Mathematics 22.2 22.2 22.5 24

Reading 21.0 21.2 21.5 22

Science 21.2 21.6 21.6 21.8

Composite 21.2 21.4 21.6 22.5

Percent Tested 23% 25% 23% 25%

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

SAT ACT

# of Targets Met


Percent at Target

District Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Documents

Transcript of District Improvement Plan 2011-2012