DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies...

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 appliesR&M Engineering08/16/11

DTM 11-003R&M Engineering

Implementation StrategyAndrew Monje

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Systems Engineering Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)

16 Aug 2011

R&M Engineering08/16/11

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies

PURPOSE• Provide overview of the R&M Implementation

Strategy upon approval of DTM 11-003

AGENDA• DTM Overview• Policy Implementation - DTM 11-003• Process - Guidance & Standards/DIDs• People - Human Capital• Summary• Open Discussion

Purpose / Agenda



• Engineering activities (AS to describe tasks and processes to be stated in the RFP)– R&M Allocations, block diagrams and predictions– Failure definitions and scoring criteria– Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)– Built-in test and maintainability demonstrations– Reliability Growth testing at system/subsystem level– Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)

• Preliminary RAM-C Report in support of MS A and updated for MS B & C– Provides early (Pre-MS A) reliability, availability, maintainability and ownership cost

feasibility assessments of alternative concepts− Includes early formulation of maintenance & support concepts

– Provides an audit trail that documents and supports JCIDS thresholds– Ensures correct balance between the sustainment metrics (Availability-KPP, Materiel

Reliability-KSA, and Ownership Cost-KSA)– Provides early risk reduction by ensuring requirements are realistic and correct

• AS and SEP to specify how the JCIDS sustainment thresholds have been translated into R&M design requirements for use in contract specifications

DTM 11-003 Overview



DTM 11-003 Overview

• Reliability Growth Strategy– Documents system-level reliability growth curves in the SEP beginning at

MS A and updated in the TEMP beginning at MS B– Establishes intermediate goals for reliability growth curves that will be

tracked through fully integrated system-level test and evaluation events until the threshold is achieved

– Requires MS C PMs and Operational Test Agencies to assess reliability growth required to achieve the reliability threshold during Initial Operational Test and Evaluation

• Tracking and Monitoring– Requires PMs to report status of reliability objectives and/or thresholds as

part of the formal system engineering review process– Incorporates Reliability Growth Curves into the Defense Acquisition

Executive System (DAES) review process



DoDI 5000.02Encl(6) Test

DAES

Quad Chart

Policy Implementation DTM 11-003

• Incorporating DTM in DoD 5000 and affected Governance Documents– DoDI 5000.02 & enclosure 12 (SE)

revision – Complete & sent to DPAP– Enclosure 13 (Logistics) – Comments

provided to L&MR– Systems Engineering Plan Outline –

Approved– Acquisition Strategy Outline – Approved– Preliminary Design Review Report

Guideline – Completed– TEMP outline – Currently in review– LCSP outline – In work– DAES RVW Growth Quad chart – In

work

SystemsEngineeringPlan (SEP)

Test & Evaluation

Master Plan

(TEMP)

TechnologyDevelopment

Strategy/Acquisition

Strategy

PreliminaryDesign ReviewReport

DTM11-0033/21/11

Life-Cycle Sustainment

Plan

Encl(12)System

Engineering

In review/In-work

Approved

Status:

DTM to Policy and Acquisition Document Relationships

DoDI 5000.02Encl(13)

Lifecycle Logistics


DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 appliesv.01

Annotated Outlines for TDS/AS, SEP Released as “Expected Business Practice”

TDS/AS and SEP outlines signed

April 20, 2011

Technology Development Strategy [or] Acquisition Strategy

Annotated Outline

Systems Engineering PlanAnnotated Outline

April 20, 2011

http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/PDUSD-ATLMemo-Expected-Bus-Practice-TDS_AS_SEP-20Apr11.pdf



• Identify the engineering activities to be stated in the RFP and required of the contractor to demonstrate the achievement of the reliability and maintainability design requirements.

• Provide a table (see example below) to specify how the sustainment key performance parameter thresholds have been translated into reliability and maintainability design and contract specifications … The reliability threshold is often expressed as Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF). Use the appropriate life units (e.g., hours, cycles, etc.). “MTTR” is “mean time to repair;” “N/A” may be entered if an item is not applicable.

R&M in the TDS/AS

Reliability and Maintainability Requirements

Parameter ThresholdContract Specification

Requirement

Reliability (e.g., MTBF)

Maintainability (e.g., MTTR)



New Reliability Reporting

Document the Reliability Growth Curve beginning at MS A, updated at each successive milestone, …

and report planning to generate R&M artifacts.

Implementation of New Reliability Policy



• Update to DAG Chapter 4 R&M Sec 4.4.15– Include overview of R&M Eng Activities by phase– Apply R&M Eng activities based on program position in

Life Cycle– Also based on acquisition strategy and equipment type

− Provides guidance on Reliability Growth Program– Includes R&M contract guidance with associated DIDs

• Collaborate with DAG Editors (i.e., to ensure R&M guidance is properly integrated

• Develop R&M Engineering Guidance with task descriptions per phase

– Describes R&M engineering activities across typical program areas

• Forming R&M Standards working group– Priority given to standards that directly relate to the R&M

engineering activities required by the DTM– R&M Eng Mgt STDs 1st (i.e. 785, 470, & 2165)– Design & Reliability Growth STDs (i.e. 1629, 1635)

Process - Guidance & Standards/DIDs

DAG LM&R

Chapter 5Updates

DAG SE Chapter 4 Updates

Key R&MEngineeringStandards &

DIDs DAG DDT&EChapter 9Updates

Defense AcquisitionGuidebook

R&M Engineering Guidebook



Materiel Solution Analysis Phase

MS A

MDD

DOD 5000.02

LIFECYCLE ENTRY

ICD TES

TDS

SEP

GOV TASK ASSIGNMENT

PR & RFP FOR MSA

INPUT TO TDS

PR/RFP TECH DEV

PHASE

PROPOSAL EVAL

CRITERIA

PROCUREMENT (SECT. VIII)

INPUT TO TES

TEST AND EVALUATION (SECT.

VII)

MAINT. ANALYSIS

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINMENT

PLAN

R&M RQMTS.

ANALYSES

TRADEOFF STUDIES

R&M ANALYSIS REPORTS

SYSTEM ENGINEERING (SECT. V)

CONFIG MGMT.

TECH DEV SYSTEM

SPEC

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (SECT.

IV)

R&M DATA RQMTS UPDATE

DATA CONTROL (SECT. III)

RAM-C REPORT

SUMMARY

INPUT TO SEP

PM PLAN

PROGRAM REVIEW

PROJECT CONTROL (SECT. II)

MS-A PHASE FUNCTIONS

R&M PLANS TECHNOLOGY

DEV PHASE

REJECT

ACCEPTA

R&M PLANS

MSAICD

1

4 5 6

12 15 19

8

7

2 1 23

10

9 11

17

16

18

13

20 14 22

2

R&M DATA

RQMTS

3

REVIEW CONTRACT

ITR ASR

FUNCTIONAL BASELINE

AOA

Draft CDD

LOGISTICS PLANNING (SECT. VI)



PeopleHuman Capital

• Objective: Increase PM demand for R&M Engineering and enhance R&M Engineering professional capabilities to successfully implement a R&M program.

• Approach– Define R&M Engineering tasks– Develop R&M Engineering

competencies for PM and R&M Engineers

– Submit R&M competencies to DAU for curriculum development via SE FIPT chair

– DAU develops training architecture, curriculums, training content and delivers training.

R&M Engineering E&T Strategy

Capture/Define R&M Engineering Tasks and Associated Roles

Define R&M Engineering Competencies For Associated Roles (incl. KSAs)

Define R&M Engineering Learning Architecture (e.g. CLMs, SPRDE/SE Courses & R&M Competencies

Integration, Dedicated R&M Courses)

Develop and Deliver Training



Summary

• Actively engaged on all Focus Areas to improve “Technical Health” of R&M Engineering

• Institutionalizing the process across the Services• Collaborating with other functionals (e.g., test, logistics …)• DTM implementation will:

– Not burden the programs with unreasonable expectations– Not drive a “One Size Fit All Solution” on programs

– Smartly apply engineering activities based on acquisition strategy & life cycle position

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies...

Documents

Transcript of DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies...