Dissertation onrepository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/5030/1/200800716thaiyalnayaki.pdfmic cal – micro...
Transcript of Dissertation onrepository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/5030/1/200800716thaiyalnayaki.pdfmic cal – micro...
Dissertation on
ASSESSMENT OF MALIGNANT RISK POTENTIAL OF THYROID
NODULES USING ULTRASOUND THYROID IMAGING REPORTING
AND DATA SYSTEM (TIRADS) CRITERIA WITH CORRELATION
BY FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY (FNAC) / EXCISION
BIOPSY
Submitted in partial fulfillment for
M.D. DEGREE EXAMINATION
BRANCH - VIII, RADIO DIAGNOSIS
COIMBATORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
COIMBATORE – 14
Dissertation submitted to
THE TAMILNADU Dr.M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
CHENNAI – 600 032
TAMILNADU
APRIL 2016
CERTIFICATE
This dissertation titled “ASSESSMENT OF MALIGNANT RISK
POTENTIAL OF THYROID NODULES USING ULTRASOUND
THYROID IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (TIRADS)
CRITERIA WITH CORRELATION BY FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION
CYTOLOGY (FNAC) / EXCISION BIOPSY” is submitted to The
Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R Medical University, Chennai, in partial fulfillment
of regulations for the award of M.D. Degree in Radio Diagnosis in the
examinations to be held during April 2016.
This dissertation is a record of fresh work done by the candidate
Dr. S. THAIYALNAYAKI, during the course of the study (2013 - 2016).
This work was carried out by the candidate herself under my
supervision.
GUIDE:
Dr.N.MURALI, M.D.RD,
Professor,
Department of Radio Diagnosis,
Coimbatore Medical College,
Coimbatore – 14
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT:
Dr.N.SUNDARI, M.D.RD,
Professor & HOD
Department of Radio Diagnosis,
Coimbatore Medical College,
Coimbatore – 14
DEAN:
Dr. A. EDWIN JOE, M.D, BL.,
Dean,
Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital,
Coimbatore – 14.
Submission author:Assignment t it le:Submission tit le:
File name:File size:
Page count:Word count:
Character count:Submission date:
Submission ID:
Digital ReceiptThis receipt acknowledges that Turnit in received your paper. Below you will f ind the receiptinf ormation regarding your submission.
The f irst page of your submissions is displayed below.
201318152.md Radio- Diagnosis S…TNMGRMU EXAMINATIONSASSESSMENT OF MALIGNANT RIS…f ull_thesis.docx3.01M8812,72974,55515-Sep-2015 10:49PM568077667
Copyright 2015 Turnitin. All rights reserved.
DECLARATION
I, Dr. S. Thaiyalnayaki solemnly declare that the dissertation titled
“ASSESSMENT OF MALIGNANT RISK POTENTIAL OF THYROID
NODULES USING ULTRASOUND THYROID IMAGING REPORTING
AND DATA SYSTEM (TIRADS) CRITERIA WITH CORRELATION
BY FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY (FNAC) / EXCISION
BIOPSY” was done by me at Coimbatore Medical College, during the period
from June 2014 to July 2015 under the guidance and supervision of Dr. N.
Murali, M.D.RD, Professor, Department of Radio Diagnosis, Coimbatore
Medical College, Coimbatore. This dissertation is submitted to the Tamilnadu
Dr.M.G.R. Medical University towards the partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of M.D. Degree (Branch - ) in Radio Diagnosis.
I have not submitted this dissertation on any previous occasion to
any University for the award of any degree.
Place:
Date: Dr. S.THAIYALNAYAKI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my sincere thanks to our respected Dean, Dr.A.EDWIN
JOE,MD., BL., Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore for
permitting me to conduct this study.
I thank Dr.R.MANI,M.D, Vice Principal, Coimbatore Medical College,
Coimbatore for his encouragement and suggestions in completing this study.
I am greatly indebted to the Head of the Department of Radio Diagnosis,
Professor Dr.N.SUNDARI, M.D (RD), who has always guided me, by
example and valuable words of advice. She has always given me her moral
support and encouragement throughout the conduct of the study and also
during my entire post graduate course. I owe my sincere thanks to her.
I will ever remain in gratitude to Dr.N.MURALI, M.D (RD), Professor,
Department of Radio Diagnosis for his valuable support and guidance
throughout my study.
I thank Dr.C.SUBHASHREE, M.D, DNB (RD), Associate Professor,
Department of Radio Diagnosis for her valuable suggestions.
I thank Dr.R. KANNADHASAN, DMRD, M.D (RD)., Assistant
Professor, Department of Radio Diagnosis for his support throughout this
study.
I would like to thank my all other beloved teachers, Department of
Radio Diagnosis for their valuable opinion and help to complete this study.
I would grossly fail in my duty, if I do not mention my gratitude to my
subjects who have volunteered to undergo the investigations for the study.
My sincere thanks to all my fellow postgraduates for their involvement
in helping me in this work.
I’m grateful to my husband, Dr. M. KAPIL DEV, MD, my son K.T.
DEV PRASATH and my parents and parents- in-law, brothers and sisters
who helped me making this study a reality.
Above all I thank the Lord Almighty for His kindness.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED
FNAC – Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology
BIRADS – Breast Imaging Reporting Ana Data System
TIRADS – Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System
MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging
DNA – Deoxy-ribo Nucleic Acid
CSF – Cerebro Spinal Fluid
MEN – Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
LIRADS – Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System
USG – Ultrasonogram
AV Shunt – Arterio Venous Shunt
CI – Confidence Interval
PPV – Positive Predictive Value
NPV – Negative Predictive Value
OR – Odds Ratio
MH – Marked Hypoechogenicity
ML Margin – Micro-Lobulated Margin
IR Margin – Irregular Margin
MIC CAL – Micro Calcification
TTW – Taller-Than-Wider Shape
CONTENTS
S.No
TOPIC
Page No
1.
INTRODUCTION
1
2.
OBJECTIVES
3
3.
METHODOLOGY
4
4.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
9
5.
OBSERVATION
61
6.
REPRESENTATIVE CASES
70
7.
DISCUSSION
75
8.
CONCLUSION
85
9.
SUMMARY
87
10.
ANNEXURE – I CONSENT FORM
88
11.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
91
12.
ANNEXURE – II MASTER CHART
95
LIST OF FIGURES
S.No
FIGURES
Page
No
1.
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL AND COPLIN JAR
7
2.
FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION TRAY
8
3.
ANATOMY OF THYROID GLAND
11
4.
SONOGRAPHIC ANATOMY OF THYROID GLAND
(AXIAL IMAGE)
12
5.
SONOGRAPHIC ANATOMY OF THYROID GLAND
(LONGITUDINAL IMAGE)
13
6.
ARTERIAL SUPPLY TO THYROID GLAND
16
7.
THYROID COLOR DOPPLER, PULSE WAVE DOPPLER
16
8.
VENOUS DRAINAGE OF THYROID GLAND
17
9.
MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THYROID GLAND
18
10.
DEVELOPMENT OF THYROID GLAND WITH
BRANCHIAL POUCHES
19
11.
DEVELOPMENT OF THYROID GLAND SHOWING
TRACT OF THYROGLOSSAL DUCT
20
12.
MECHANISM OF ACTION OF THYROID HORMONE
21
13.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF SUPPURATIVE
THYROIDITIS
25
14.
HASHIMOTO’S THYROIDITIS SHOWING COARSE
PARENCHYMAL ECHOTEXTURE AND INCREASED
VASCULARITY
26
15.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE RIEDEL’S THYROIDITIS
27
16.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF ADENOMAS OF THYROID
GLAND
28
17.
MICROSCOPIC PICTURE OF PAPILLARY THYROID
CARCINOMA SHOWING ORPHAN ANNIE EYE
NUCLEI WITH PSAMMOMA BODIES
30
18.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF PAPILLARY CARCINOMA
SHOWING
MULTIPLE MICROCALCIFICATION
32
19.
FOLLICULAR THYROID CARCINOMA SHOWING
CAPILLARY INVASION
33
20.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF FOLLICULAR THYROID
CARCINOMA
34
21.
MICROSCOPIC PICTURE OF ANAPLASTIC
CARCINOMA OF THYROID GLAND
35
22.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF ANAPLASTIC
CARCINOMA OF THYROID
GLAND
35
23.
MICROSCOPIC PICTURE OF MEDULLARY THYROID
CARCINOMA SHOWING AMYLOID BODIES
36
24.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF MEDULLARY THYROID
CARCINOMA
37
25.
SONOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF LYMPHOMA
37
26.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON THE SHAPE
62
27.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON THE ECHOGENICITY
64
28.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON THE CONTENT
65
29.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON THE CALCIFICATION
66
30.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON THE MARGIN
67
31.
CHART SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THYROID
NODULES DEPENDING UPON TIRADS CATEGORY
69
32.
ULTRASOUND IMAGE OF COLLOID GOITER
70
33.
ULTRASOUND IMAGE OF NODULAR GOITRE WITH
CYSTIC DEGENERATION
71
34.
ULTRASOUND IMAGE OF PAPILLARY THYROID
CARCINOMA
72
35.
ULTRASOUND IMAGE OF FOLLICULAR THYROID
CARCINOMA
73
36.
ULTRASOUND IMAGE OF LYMPHOMA OF THYROID
GLAND
74
37.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF TIRADS
CATEGORY BETWEEN TWO STUDIES
76
38.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES
FOR IRREGULAR MARGIN
77
39.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES
FOR TALLER-THAN-WIDER SHAPE
79
40.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES
FOR MICROCALCIFICATION
80
41.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES
FOR MARKED HYPOECHOGENICITY
82
42.
CHART SHOWING COMPARISON OF ODDS RATIO
FOR SUSPICIOUS ULTRASOUND FEATURES
82
LIST OF TABLES
S.NO
TABLES
PAGE
NO
1.
RELIABILITY OF ULTRASOUND FEATURES TO
DIFFERENTIATE BENIGN AND MALIGNANT
THYROID NODULES
41
2.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON THE SHAPE
62
3.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON ECHOGENICITY
63
4.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON CONTENT
64
5.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON CALCIFICATION
66
6.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON THE MARGIN
67
7.
NUMBER OF THYROID NODULES DEPENDING
UPON TIRADS CATEGORY
68
8.
PERCENTAGE OF THYROID NODULES
DEPENDING UPON TIRADS CATEGORY
69
9.
COMPARISON OF TIRADS CATEGORY BETWEEN
TWO STUDIES
75
10.
COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES FOR IRREGULAR
MARGIN
77
11.
COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES FOR TALLER-
THAN-WIDER SHAPE
78
12.
COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES FOR
MICROCALCIFICATION
80
13.
COMPARISON OF TWO STUDIES FOR MARKED
HYPOECHOGENICITY
81
14.
COMPARISON OF ODDS RATIO FOR SUSPICIOUS
ULTRASOUND FEATURES
83
INTRODUCTION
1
INTRODUCTION
High resolution ultrasonography is very well suited for imaging superficial
structures such as the thyroid gland in exquisite detail. The improved resolution
available with modern day high frequency transducers allows for appreciation of
disease process much before clinical detection. Also in established disease, the
characterization by ultrasound is extremely useful.
Thyroid gland is one of the major endocrine gland which can be affected by
various congenital anomalies, inflammatory disease processes and various kinds of
tumors which can present clinically as thyroid nodules. The nodules of the thyroid
gland include both benign and malignant nodules. Currently, ultrasonography is one
of the investigating procedures used for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. But it is not
the confirmatory method to differentiate the benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
The investigating procedure which is used for the differentiation of benign from
malignant tumors is fine needle aspiration cytology.
Another disadvantage of fine needle aspiration cytology is that it is an invasive
and painful procedure. Rarely it can also cause life threatening fatal haemorrhage by
causing damage to the adjacent major blood vessels and also it carries the risk of
introducing infective agents into the body. It is also difficult to decide which thyroid
nodule needs Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and which does not need. In order to
avoid these problems the thyroid nodules were classified into TIRADS (Thyroid
Imaging Reporting AndData System) category based on suspicious ultrasound
2
features. This enables objectivity of reporting, risk stratification and guidance for the
clinician towards the next step.
OBJECTIVES
3
OBJECTIVES
1. To classify the thyroid nodules into Thyroid Imaging Reporting AndData
System (TIRADS) category based on suspicious ultrasound features.
2. To compare the suspicious ultrasound features with the pathological
findings and to analyse the risk of malignancy of suspicious ultrasound
features.
METHODOLOGY
4
METHODOLOGY
This study has been undertaken on the patients admitted in Coimbatore
Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore during the study period (July 2014 – June
2015).
STEP: 1 Thepatients referred to radiology department for the ultrasonogram of
thyroid gland for the evaluation of thyroid nodules were analysed by their primary
thyroid complaints, the relevant positive and negative histories and proper clinical
examination of thyroid gland. Appropriate cases have been selected after evaluation of
clinical case details and diligently applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients (of any age group, and both sex) came to the hospital with primary
thyroid related complaints and referred to the radiology department for
ultrasonography of thyroid gland for the evaluation of thyroid nodules were included
in this study.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. Patientswith secondary thyroid related disorders like drug / radiation induced
hypo / hyper thyroidism.
2. Systemic or central nervous system related secondary thyroid involvement.
3. Pregnant women.
4. Patients not capable of giving consent (psychiatric patients)
5. Patients not willing to participate in the study (who refused to give the consent)
5
6. Patients willing for ultrasonography of thyroid but not willing for ultrasound
guided fine needle aspiration cytology.
STEP: 2 The patients were then evaluated by high resolution ultrasonography of
thyroid gland for the presence of thyroid nodules and also various sonographic
findings of the thyroid nodules were analysed. The key ultrasound features that were
analysed include the shape of the nodules (wider-than-taller / taller-than-wider),
echogenicity (iso/hyper echogenicity, hypoechogenicity, marked hypoechogenicity),
content (solid, cystic or mixed), calcification (no calcification, micro calcification,
macro calcification), margins (smooth, irregular, microlobulated). Based on the
ultrasound features the thyroid nodules were stratified into appropriate Thyroid
Imaging Reporting And Data System category.
STEP: 3. After ultrasound evaluation, these patients underwent ultrasound guided fine
needle aspiration cytology. In case of multiple nodules the nodules which had most
suspicious sonographic findings for malignancy or the dominant thyroid nodule were
selected for fine needle aspiration. The procedure and the complications of FNAC
were explained to the patient before getting the consent. Patients were positioned in
neck extension with pillow under the shoulder. Under strict aseptic precautions, 23
gauge needle was introduced into the suspicious thyroid nodule with ultrasound
guidance. The needle is moved back and forth, varying the angle. Then the needle is
withdrawn andattached to the syringe and the sample is blown onto the microscopic
slides. Then the slides are kept in the coplin jar containing the fixative isopropyl
alcohol. After fixation the slides along with coplin jar were sent to pathology
department for cytological analysis.
6
STEP: 4. The confirmatory diagnosis from fine needle aspiration material has been
obtained from pathology department. Then these FNAC reports were compared with
ultrasound findings (TIRADS category) of the corresponding nodules and analysed for
the association of these ultrasound findings with the benign and malignant thyroid
tumors. The ultrasound findings were correlated with histopathological reports of the
specimen of thyroid surgery if FNAC reports were indeterminate or of inadequate
sample volume.
DURATION OF THE STUDY: 1 year (June 2014 – July 2015)
TYPE OF THE STUDY: short term prospective study.
Total number of patients: 200 patients
Total number of nodules analysed and assigned as per TIRADS – 227 nodules.
Total number of nodules for which FNAC was done – 200 nodules.
Total number of lesions that underwent surgical excision: 46.
Total number for which definite diagnosis by FNAC was made: 154
SOURCE OF DATA:
Data consists of primary data collected by the principal investigator directly
from the patients who came for ultrasound thyroid to the Department of Radiology,
Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore for primary thyroid related
symptoms.
7
MATERIALS USED IN THIS STUDY:
1. Ultrasound machine (sonoscape, control number 210724, software version SI
5000 ) using linear transduser (7 – 13 MHz)
2. 23 Gauge needle with 5 ml disposable plastic syringe
3. Glass slides
4. Isopropyl alcohol
5. Coplin jar
Figure: 1. Isopropyl alcohol and Coplin jar.
8
6. Antiseptic solution
7. Gauze pieces, sterile towel.
8. Software EPI INFO version7 used for statistical analysis.
Figure: 2. Fine Needle Aspiration Tray.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
9
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The thyroid gland is located superficially in the anterior aspect of the neck.
There are several diagnostic methods currently available for the evaluation of thyroid
disease. As the thyroid gland is located superficially in the neck, high resolution real
time gray scale and colour Doppler sonography can demonstrate normal thyroid
anatomy and pathologic conditions with remarkable clarity. So the ultrasound plays an
important role in the diagnostic evaluation of thyroid diseases. The high frequency
transducers (7.5 – 15.0 MHz) provide deep ultrasound penetration (up to 5 cm) and
high definition images, with a resolution of 0.5 to 1.0 mm. Contrast enhanced
sonography and sonoelastography are the two newer techniques used for the
sonographic evaluation of thyroid gland.
I) SALIENT ANATOMY OF THYROID GLAND WITH
SONOGRAPHIC CORRELATES:
Thyroid gland is a major endocrine gland located in the anterior aspect of the
neck (infrahyoid compartment) in front and at the sides of the trachea. It has a rich
vascular supply provided by carotid system of blood vessels. The gland has two
coverings namely inner true capsule and an outer false capsule. The false capsule is
derived from the pretracheal fascia which is attached above to the hyoid bone and
oblique line of thyroid cartilage and below it blends with the apex of the fibrous
pericardium. The false capsule is thickened to form the ligament of Berry which
connects the lateral lobe of the gland to the cricoid cartilage. Because of these
attachments the thyroid gland is able to move up and down with deglutition.1
10
PRESENTING PARTS:
The thyroid gland consists of two lateral lobes which are connected together by
an isthmus across the median line. Each lobe measures about 5 cm, 3 cm, 2 cm in
length, breath and thickness respectively. But the size and shape of each lobe varies
widely in different individuals. In tall individuals the sagittal scan shows
longitudinally elongated lateral lobes; in shorter individuals the gland is more oval. In
newborn the gland measures about 18 – 20 mm long with antero-posterior diameter
measures about 8 – 9 mm. At about 1 year of age the mean length is 25 mm and the
antero-posterior diameter is 12 – 15 mm.In adults the mean length is about 40 – 60
mm with antero-posterior diameter measures 13 – 18 mm. The isthmus measures
about 4 – 6 mm in mean thickness2.
The volume of the thyroid gland can be calculated with linear parameters or
with mathematical formulas. The antero-posterior diameter is considered to be most
precise in calculating thyroid volume because it is relatively independent of possible
dimensional asymmetry between the two lobes. Thyroid volume can be calculated
accurately by using sonography. The thyroid gland is considered to be enlarged,
when the antero-posterior diameter measures more than 2 cm2.
The mathematical formula to calculate the thyroid volume is length X width X
thickness X 0.529. This formula is based on the ellipsoid formula. The volume of the
thyroid gland can also be calculated by using three – dimensional ultrasound
technology either automatically or manually2.
11
The thyroid volume in neonates measures about 0.40 – 1.40 ml, in adults it
ranges from 10 – 11 ± 3 ml. The thyroid volume varies in different patients with
different diseases. The volume is more in patients living in iodine deficiency areas and
in patients with acute hepatitis or chronic renal failure. The thyroid volume is
decreased in patients with chronic hepatitis or in patients treated with thyroxine or
radioactive iodine2.
Each lateral lobe of thyroid gland consists of an apex, base, three surfaces and
two borders.
Figure: 3. Anatomy of thyroid gland
12
The apex of the lateral lobe is sandwiched between inferior constrictor and
sternothyroid, so that the thyroid swelling cannot extent above the oblique line of
thyroid cartilage. The superior thyroid artery and external laryngeal nerve diverge
from each other close to the apex of the gland.
The base is related to the inferior thyroid artery and external laryngeal nerve
and it extends up to 5th
or 6th
tracheal ring.
In 10 – 40 % of normal subjects a small thyroid lobe called as pyramidal lobe
arising superiorly from the isthmus. The pyramidal lobe can be routinely visualized in
younger patients but in adults it undergoes progressive atrophy and it becomes
invisible.Sonographically the normal thyroid parenchyma has a homogenous,
medium to high level echogenicity. The capsule of the thyroid gland is represented by
Figure: 4. Sonographic anatomy of thyroid gland (axial image)
13
a thin hyperechoic line around the thyroid lobes. The capsule becomes calcified in
patients with uremia or in disorders of calcium metabolism2.
On computed topography the normal thyroid tissue is identified by its higher
density compared to the adjacent structures. The thyroid tissue has high density due to
its high iodine content. Computed topography is mainly used for the identification of
ectopic thyroid tissue3.
Figure: 5. Sonographic anatomy of thyroid gland (longitudinal image)
On T 1 weighted images of MRI the intensity of the normal thyroid gland is
lower compared to the surrounding fat. It shows medium intensity on T 1 weighted
images whereas on T 2 weighted images the intensity is slightly increased. On T 2
images these intensity is more than the overlying strap muscles4.
14
RELATIONS:
The antero-lateral surface is related to sternothyroid, sternohyoid and superior
belly of omohyoid muscles. The medial surface is related to larynx and trachea,
pharynx and oesophagus. The poster-lateral surface is related to carotid sheath and its
content.
The parathyroid gland is located along the posterior borders of the lateral lobe
of the gland.
The isthmus measures about 1.25 cm in both vertical and transverse diameter
lies in front of 2nd
, 3rd
, 4th
tracheal ring.Occasionally a pyramidal lobe extends
upwards from the upper border of isthmus.
Levatorglandulithyroidae is a fibro-muscular band, extends from the hyoid
bone to the isthmus or to the pyramidal lobe1.
Sonographically the sternohyoid and the strap muscles appear as thin,
hypoechoic bands anterior to the thyroid gland. Sternocleidomastoid muscle seen in
the lateral aspect of thyroid gland as large oval band.The longuscolli muscle located
posterior to each thyroid lobe serves as important anatomical landmark. On
longitudinal thyroid scans inferior thyroid artery and recurrent laryngeal nerve are
seen between the thyroid lobe and oesophagus on the left side whereas on the right
side these structures are seen between the thyroid lobe and longuscolli muscle. The
oesophagus can be identified in the transverse plane by the target appearance of
bowel2.
15
BLOOD SUPPLY:
ARTERIAL SUPPLY:
Thyroid gland is mainly supplied by superior and inferior thyroid arteries
which are branches from external carotid artery and thyrocervical trunk respectively.
The superior thyroid artery accompanied by the external laryngeal nerve runs
downwards forwards and in the upper pole of the lateral lobe it divides into anterior
and posterior branches. The anterior branch runs along the anterior aspect of the
lateral lobe and the upper border of the isthmus where it anastomoses with the
corresponding artery of the opposite side. The posterior branch runs downwards along
the posterior aspect of the lateral and near the base of the gland it anastomoses with
the ascending branch of the inferior thyroid artery. The inferior thyroid artery ascends
in front of the medial border of the scalenus anterior and on reaching the lower pole of
the gland it divides into ascending and descending glandular branches which supply
the posterior and inferior parts of the gland. The thyroid gland is also supplied by
accessory thyroid arteries which are derived from oesophageal and tracheal branches.
Arteriathyroideaima is an occasional branch from arch of aorta also supplies the
gland1.
Sonographically the superior thyroid artery and vein are found at the upper
pole of each lateral lobe. The inferior thyroid artery is situated posterior to the lower
third of each lateral lobe, whereas the inferior thyroid vein is located at the lower pole.
The peak systolic velocity in the major thyroid arteries varies between 20 – 40 cm /
16
Figure: 6. Arterial supply to thyroid gland
sec and in the intraparenchymal arteries it is about 15 – 30 cm / sec. The
meandiameter of the arteries is about 1 -2 mm whereas for the lower veins it can be up
to 8 mm2.
Figure: 7. Thyroid color Doppler, Pulse wave Doppler
17
VENOUS DRAINAGE:
The venous blood is drained by superior and middle thyroid veins which drains
into the internal jugular vein and by the inferior thyroid vein which drains into the left
brachiocephalic vein. Occasionally a fourth thyroid vein (kocher’s vein) emerges from
the lower pole and drains into the internal jugular vein1.
Figure: 8. venous drainage of thyroid gland
BRIEF REVIEW OF HISTOLOGY OF THYROID GLAND:
The fibrous capsule covering the gland sends septa and divides the gland into
lobules. Each lobule is made up of an aggregation of follicles. The follicles are filled
by a homogenous material called colloid. The spaces between the follicles are filled
by delicate connective tissue. The follicles are lined by follicular cells which rest over
the basement membrane. The parafollicular cells are present between the follicular
cells and the basement membrane. They may also lie in the interval between the
follicular cells5.
18
Figure: 9. Microscopic anatomy of thyroid gland
BRIEF REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT OF THYROID GLAND:
Thyroid gland develops from the endodermal cells dorsal to the
tuberculamimpar. These cells evaginate caudally through the substance of the tongue
and form the thyroglossal duct which grows in the median plane ventral to the hyoid
bone. Ventral to the proximal part of trachea, thyroglossal duct divides into a bilobed
mass which forms the primodium of the isthmus and the lateral lobes of the thyroid
gland. Later the thyroglossal duct disappears, but sometimes the caudal end of the
duct persist as pyramidal lobe. The cephalic end of the thyroglossal duct persists as
foramen caecum of the tongue. Later the bi-lobed mass subdivides into a series of
double cellular plates. Then the colloid materials accumulate within the bilaminar
plates and forms primary thyroid follicles. Subsequent budding from these follicles
forms the definitive follicles.
19
Figure: 10. Development of thyroid gland with branchial pouches
The lateral thyroid rudiments, derived from the caudal pharyngeal complex of
fourth pouch, fuse with the bilobed mass and prevent the further caudal migration of
the mass. The parafollicular cells are derived from the ultimobranchial body of the
caudal pharyngeal complex6.
Congenital anomalies of thyroid gland include aplasia of one lobe or the whole
gland, hypoplasia of part of thyroid gland and ectopic thyroid tissue. These anomalies
can be demonstrated by using ultrasonography. The hypoplasia of thyroid gland can
be diagnosed sonographically by demonstrating the diminished size of the gland.
Ectopic thyroid tissue can be demonstrated by using radionuclide scans2.
20
Figure: 11. Development of thyroid gland showing tract of thyroglossal duct
II) BRIEF REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY OF THYROID GLAND:
The thyroid gland secretes the hormone named as thyroxin through which it
regulates the various metabolic activities of the human body including lipid and
carbohydrate metabolism. It also increases the O2 consumption by the cells present in
the body.
The thyroid hormone acts by binding to the thyroid hormone receptor which is
present in the nuclei of the cell. This hormone - receptor complex after binding with
DNA via zinc fingers, increases or decreases the expression of variety of
differentgenes that code for proteins that regulate cell function. There are two thyroid
hormone
21
Figure: 12. Mechanism of action of thyroid hormone
receptor genes named as α and β receptor genes located on chromosome 17 and
chromosome 3 respectively7.
ACTIONS OF THYROID HORMONE:
1. The thyroid hormone increases the oxygen consumption of most of the
metabolically active cells.
2. Thyroid hormone increases the force of contraction and cardiac output and
it decreases the circulation time.
22
3. Thyroid hormone has marked effect on the developing brain. In
hypothyroidism the mentation becomes slow and the CSF protein level is
increased.
4. The thyroid hormone increases the protein catabolism that leads to muscle
weakness.
5. It also increases the rate of carbohydrate absorption from the GIT and
decreases the circulating cholesterol level.
6. The thyroid hormone is also essential for normal growth and skeletal
maturation.
7. The parafollicularcells of the thyroid gland secrete another hormone called
as calcitonin which also regulates the circulating calcium levels7.
III) REVIEW OF DISEASES AFFECTING THYROID GLAND AND
THEIR SONOGRAPHIC FEATURES:
Diseases of the thyroid gland are associated with either excessive release or deficiency
of thyroid hormones. Excessive release of thyroid hormone causes hyperthyroidism.
The hyperthyroidism is manifested by palpitation, rapid pulse, muscle weakness,
nervousness, fatigability, heat intolerance, weight loss with good appetite, excessive
perspiration, fine tremor of the hand and variable enlargement of thyroid gland.
Diffuse hyperplasia of thyroid gland associated with graves disease (accounts for 85%
of cases), exogenous thyroid hormone administration,
hyperfunctionalmultinodulargoiter, hyperfunctional adenomas and thyroiditis are the
causes of hyperthyroidism.
23
Decreased synthesis of thyroid hormone causes hypothyroidism. Clinically the
hypothyroidism manifests as cretinism (in infancy and early childhood) and
myxedema (in older children or adult). Clinical manifestations of cretinism include
severe mental retardation, short stature, coarse facial features, protruding tongue and
umbilical hernia. Myxedema manifest as slowing of physical and mental activity. The
causes of hypothyroidism include insufficient thyroid parenchyma (developmental,
radiation injury, surgical ablation, hashimato thyroiditis), decreased thyroid hormone
synthesis (iodine deficiency, drugs, hashimoto thyroiditis), pituitary lesions leads to
reduced TSH secretion and hypothalamic lesions associated with decreased
thyrotropin–releasing hormone synthesis.
The following pathological conditions can occur in the thyroid gland8.
CONGENITAL ANOMALIES:
1. Aplasia of thyroid gland
2. Hypoplasia of thyroid gland
3. Ectopic thyroid tissue
4. Lateral aberrant thyroid.
5. Thyroglossal duct anomalies.
INFLAMMATORY:
1. Acute suppurative thyroiditis
2. Subacute thyroiditis
24
3. Chronic thyroiditis including chronic granulomatous thyroiditis,
Riedels thyroiditis, autoimmune thyroiditis (hashimoto’s
thyroiditis)
ADENOMAS:
1. Follicular adenoma
2. Hyalinising trabecular tumor.
CARCINOMAS:
1. Papillary thyroid carcinoma.
2. Follicular thyroid carcinoma
3. Poorly differentiated carcinoma
4. Anaplastic carcinoma.
5. Sclerosingmucoepidermoid carcinoma with eosinophilia
6. Medullary carcinoma
7. Mucinous carcinoma
8. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
9. Squamous cell carcinoma
10. Mixed medullary and follicular cell carcinoma.
Other thyroid tumors include teratoma, plasmacytoma, primary lymphoma,
angiosarcoma etc…
25
THYROIDITIS:
Thyroiditis is a group of disorder characterised by inflammation of thyroid
gland. The diseases included in this category are infectious thyroiditis, subacute
granulomatous thyroiditis (associated with acute illness with severe thyroid pain),
subacute lymphocytic thyroiditis (painless thyroiditis) and fibrous thyroiditis (reidel’s
thyroiditis).
Acute suppurative thyroiditis is caused by bacterial infection and mostly it
affects children. Sonographically it demonstrates an abscess with internal debris with
or without septa and also adjacent inflammatory nodes. Subacute granulomatous
thyroiditis is caused by viral infection. Sonographically it demonstrates enlarged
thyroid gland with focal hypoechoic regions2.
Figure: 13. Sonographic image of suppurative thyroiditis
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is an autoimmune thyroiditis caused by autoantibodies to their
own thyroglobulin and thyroid peroxidase. Sonographically it typically demonstrates
26
Figure:14. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis showing coarse parenchymal echotexture and
increased vascularity.
diffuse, coarsened, parenchymal echotexture with micronodulation and multiple
fibrous septations. The color Doppler imaging shows normal or decreased vascularity
in majority of cases. The gland shows hypervascularity when hypothyroidism occurs
due to increased thyroid stimulating hormone. It also demonstrates cervical
lymphadenopathy mostly near the lower part of the gland2.
The riedel’s thyroiditis is associated with mediastinal fibrosis, retroperitoneal
fibrosis or with sclerosing cholangitis. In riedel’s thyroiditis the thyroid gland is
diffusely enlarged and it also demonstrates inhomogenous parenchymal echotexture
sonographically2.
Graves disease is an autoimmune disorder of thyroid gland produced by
autoantibodies against TSH receptors, thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin
(TSI),thyroid growth stimulating immunoglobulins, TSH binding
inhibitorimmunoglobulins. It is the most common cause of endogenous
hyperthyroidism.
27
Figure: 15. Sonographic image Riedel’s thyroiditis
Diseases of thyroid gland can present clinically with one or more thyroid
nodules. Clinically it is the challenge for the surgeons to differentiate between benign
and malignant nodules. Most of the thyroid nodules are benign in nature. Less than
one per cent of the thyroid nodules are malignant in nature.
Approximately 80 % of thyroid nodules are caused by hyperplasia of the gland.
The causes of thyroid nodular diseases include iodine deficiency, hormonal imbalance
and medications which lead to poor utilization of iodine. When the hyperplasia causes
overall increase in size or volume of the gland, it is called as goiter. Pathologically the
nodules are often referred to as hyperplastic, adenomatous or colloid nodules. Most of
the hyperplastic nodules undergo liquefactive degeneration and becomes colloid
nodules.
Sonographically these nodules are isoechoic compared to normal thyroid tissue.
Some nodules are hyperechoic because of numerous interfaces between cells and
colloid substance. The perinodular blood vessels and mild edema or compression of
28
the adjacent normal parenchyma will appear as thin peripheral hypoechoic halo
around the nodule. The serous or colloid fluid present in the nodules are anechoic in
nature. Echogenic fluid or moving fluid-fluid levels correspond to haemorrhage.
Microcrystals or aggregates of colloid substance cause bright echogenic foci with
comet tail artifacts. Calcifications of the thyroid nodules appears as either thin,
peripheral shells (eggshell) or coarse, highly reflective foci with associated shadows.
The attenuated strands of thyroid tissue appear as thin intracysticseptation.The
vascularity of the thyroid nodules are detected by color Doppler sonography and with
high sensitivity Doppler technology2.
ADENOMAS:
5 – 10 % of thyroid nodules are adenomas. Most adenomas result in no thyroid
dysfunction; less than 10 % adenomas hyperfunction and cause thyrotoxicosis. The
Figure: 16 Sonographic image of adenomas of thyroid gland
benign follicular adenomas are distinguished according to the type of cell proliferation
into fetal adenoma, hurthle cell adenoma and embryonal adenoma. Sonographically,
29
adenomas are solid masses that may be hyperechoic, isoechoic, or hypoechoic. They
often have thick, smooth peripheral hypoechoic halo due to fibrous capsule and blood
vessels2.
CARCINOMAS:
Carcinoma of the thyroid gland arising from the follicular epithelium except for
the medullary thyroid carcinoma. The most common type of thyroid carcinoma is
papillary thyroid carcinoma. 85% of thyroid carcinomas are papillary thyroid
carcinoma, 5 - 15% of carcinomas are follicular carcinoma, 5 % of cases belong to
medullary thyroid carcinoma and less than 5% thyroid carcinomas are anaplastic
carcinomas.
The incidence of solitary papillary nodules in adult in united states various
between 1 – 10%. This incidence is even higher in endemic goiterous areas. Out of
these solitary papillary nodules less than 1% of solitary thyroid nodules are malignant.
The ratio between the benign neoplasm and the thyroid carcinoma is 10: 1. The
solitary nodules present in younger patients, and the nodules in male are more likely
to be neoplastic. The nodules which show hot spot in imaging studies are benign in
nature. The nodules present in patients with the history of radiation treatment to the
head and neck region are more likely to be malignant9.
PAPILLARY THYROID CARCINOMA:
Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common thyroid carcinoma commonly
seen between 25 – 50 years age group. Papillary thyroid carcinoma is associated with
the history of ionizing radiation. Microscopically the cells which give rise to papillary
30
thyroid carcinoma shows characteristic appearance of the nuclei called as Orphan
Annie eye nuclei. Papillary thyroid carcinoma can contain branching papillae having
fibrovascular stalk. This fibrovascular stalk is covered by single to multiple layers of
cuboidal epithelial cells9.
Figure: 17. Microscopic picture of papillary thyroid carcinoma showing
orphan annie eye nuclei with psammoma bodies.
In cross sections of papillary thyroid carcinoma cytoplasmic invaginations give
the appearance of intranuclear inclusions called as pseudo – inclusions also called as
intranuclear grooves. Microscopically the papillary thyroid carcinoma often
demonstratesPsammoma bodies which are representing concentrically calcified
structures9.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma shows other variants like follicular variant which
has characteristic nuclei of papillary thyroid carcinoma but has an almost totally
follicular architecture.
31
It also shows tall cell variant which is marked by tall columnar cells. These tall
columnar cells are lining the papillary structures with intensely eosinophilic
cytoplasm.
Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma shows prominent
papillary pattern intermixed with solid areas containing nests of squamous metaplasia.
It also shows diffuse fibrosis throughout the gland.
There is another variant called as papillary microcarcinoma which shows all
the features of papillary thyroid carcinoma and the size is less than 1 cm.
Clinically the papillary carcinoma manifest as asymptomatic thyroid nodule
and mass in the cervical lymph node. It shows cold masses on scintiscan. The 10 year
survival rate for papillary carcinoma is 98%9.
Sonographically 90% of papillary carcinoma cases show hypoechogenicity due
to closely packed cell content with minimal colloid substance. It also shows
microcalcification appearing as tiny, punctate hyperechoic foci with or without
acoustic shadows. In aggressive cases microcalcification may be the only sonographic
sign.
90% of papillary carcinomas also demonstrate hypervascularity in
ultrasonography, and also cervical lymph node metastasis which may contain tiny,
punctate echogenic foci caused by microcalcification.
Papillary microcarcinoma on high frequency ultrasound shows small,
hyperechoic patch under the capsule with thickening and retraction of the capsule or
32
as a minute hypoechoic nodule with blurred irregular outline with no visible
microcalcification2.
Figure: 18. Sonographic image of papillary thyroid carcinoma showing multiple
microcalcification
FOLLICULAR THYROID CARCINOMA:
10 – 20 % of thyroid cancers are follicular carcinomas. It is commonly seen in
women with the peak incidence at 40 – 50 years of age. Dietary iodine deficiency is
associated with increased incidence of follicular carcinoma.
33
Figure: 19. Follicular thyroid carcinoma showing capillary invasion
follicular cells donot show the typical features of papillary arcinoma9.Microscopically
the follicular thyroid carcinoma composed of fairly uniform cells forming small
follicular cells containing colloid. And also the nuclei present in the
There is no sonographicfeature which differentiate follicular carcinoma from
follicular adenoma. But the features that suggest follicular carcinoma include irregular
tumor margins, thick irregular halo and a tortuous or chaotic arrangement of internal
blood vessels on color Doppler imaging2.
Clinically it presents as slowly enlarging painless nodules. Through vascular
invasion it spread to bones, lungs, liver and elsewhere with little propensity for
lymphatic spread. Usually it shows cold nodules but in rare cases it shows warm
nodules on scintiscan. The ten year survival rate for follicular carcinoma is 92%9.
34
Figure: 20. Sonographic image of Follicular thyroid carcinoma
ANAPLASTIC CARCINOMA:
Anaplastic carcinoma is also called as undifferentiated carcinoma. The
anaplastic carcinoma composed of highly anaplastic cells with variable morphology.
The cells present in the anaplastic carcinoma can be
1. Large pleomorphic giant cells with occasional osteoclast like multinucleate
giant cells.
2. Spindle cells with a sarcomatous appearance or
3. Mixed spindle and giant cells.
Anaplastic carcinoma is commonly seen in older people with mean age of 65
years. Anaplastic carcinoma develops from more differentiated tumors due to genetic
changes possibly the loss of p53 tumor suppressor gene. Clinically it presents as
rapidly enlarging bulky neck mass with the compression of adjacent vital structures
present in the neck. The disease is uniformly fatal with 100% mortality9.
35
Figure: 21. Microscopic picture of Anaplastic carcinoma of thyroid gland
Sonographically the anaplastic carcinoma demonstrates large, hypoechoic mass
often encase or invade blood vessels and neck muscles2.
Figure: 22. Sonographic image of Anaplastic carcinoma of thyroid gland
MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA:
The medullary thyroid carcinoma presents as solitary nodule. These are
neuroendocrine neoplasms derived from parafollicularcells which are also called as C
cells or clear cells and it secretes calcitonin.
36
Microscopically the medullary thyroid carcinoma shows polygonal to spindle
shaped cells which may form nests, trabeculae and even follicles. The adjacent stroma
also demonstrateacellular amyloid deposits derived from altered calcitonin
polypeptides9.
Figure: 23. Microscopic picture of Medullary thyroid carcinoma showing
Amyloid bodies
Sonography of medullary carcinoma is similar to that of papillary carcinoma
and is seen most often as hypoechoic solid mass. Calcification is often seen but ismore
coarse than the calcifications seen in typical papillary carcinoma2.
Familial cases of medullary thyroid carcinoma showbilaterality and
multicentricity. Microscopically it shows multicentric C cell hyperplasia in the
surrounding thyroid parenchyma. 80% of medullary carcinomas are sporadic and the
remaining cases are associated with MEN syndrome. Medullary carcinoma in
37
association with MEN syndrome occurs in younger patients whereas sporadic cases
presents with peak incidence at 40 – 50 years of age9.
Figure: 24. Sonographic image of Medullary thyroid carcinoma
Lymphoma of thyroid gland is mostly non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma accounts for
4% of thyroid malignancies. Sonographically the lymphoma appears as an extremely
hypoechoic and lobulated mass. Large areas of cystic necrosis may occur in the
Figure: 25. Sonographic image of lymphoma
38
lymphoma. Lymphomas are mostly hypovascular on color Doppler or may show
blood vessels with chaotic distribution and AV shunts2.
Metastasis of thyroid gland usually occurs from melanoma (39%), breast (21%)
and renal cell carcinoma (10%). Sonographically metastasis of thyroid gland appears
as solid, homogenously hypoechoic masses without calcifications2.
IV) DIFFERENTIATION OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT THYROID
NODULES:
i) ANALYSIS OF KEY ULTRASOUND FEATURES:
Ultrasonography is commonly used for evaluation of thyroid nodules. But no
single sonographic criterion can be used to distinguish between benign and malignant
thyroid nodules. The following characteristic features of thyroid nodules can be used
to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
1. Internal contents: The thyroid nodule which has significant cystic
component is usually benign adenomatous nodule. Spongiform appearance
of thyroid nodules associated with well-defined margins and
isoechogenecity is suggestive of benign thyroid nodule. The nodules which
contain comet tail artifacts are benign in nature. Detection of solid
elements or projections of more than 1 cm into the cystic lumen with or
without microcalcification can lead to suspicion of malignancy especially in
cystic papillary carcinoma.
39
2. Shape: the malignant nodules have the tendency to grow across the normal
tissue planes. So the malignant nodules are taller than wider in shape. The
benign nodules have the tendency to grow parallel to normal tissue planes.
3. Echogenicity: the malignant thyroid nodules are usually hypoechoic in
nature, but most of the benign thyroid nodules are also hypoechoic in
nature. So the marked hypoechogenicity is suggestive of malignant nodules
whereas the benign lesions have less marked hypoechogenicity.
Hyperechoic nodules are more likely to be benign in nature. Isoechogenic
nodules carry intermediate to low risk of malignancy. Isoechogenicity has
high specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of the
thyroid nodules.
4. Halo: sonographically a thin peripheral halo seen around 60 – 80 % of
benign thyroid nodules and 15 % of thyroid cancers. The thin, complete
peripheral halo which can be demonstrated by color Doppler imaging
represents blood vessels around the periphery of the lesion, strongly
suggestive of benign nodules. Rapidly growing thyroid cancers often have
thick, irregular and incomplete halos.
5. Margin: sharp, well defined margins are representing benign thyroid
nodules, whereas irregular, speculated or poorly defined margins are
representing malignant lesion.
6. Calcification: large and coarse calcifications are seen more likely in benign
nodules. Peripheral egg shell calcification is a characteristic feature of
40
benign thyroid nodule. Fine and punctate calcifications, thickened and
interrupted peripheral calcifications especially when associated with
hypoechoic halo are strongly suggestive of malignant nodules.
Microcalcfications have the highest accuracy rate (76%), specificity (93%)
and positive predictive value (70%) for malignancy as a single sign.
7. Doppler flow pattern: 80 – 95% of adenomatous nodules demonstrate
peripheral vascularity in color Doppler imaging. 70 – 90 % of malignant
thyroid nodules demonstrate internal vascularity. The intranodular vessels
has significantly higher resistive index in malignant nodules.
8. Malignant cervical lymph nodes are located in the lower third of the neck,
usually rounded and have no echogenic hilum, whereas benign cervical
lymph nodes are slender, oval shape with central echogenic band that
represents the fatty hilum2.
41
Table: 1. Reliability of ultrasound features to differentiate benign and malignant
thyroid nodules.
Features Benign Malignant
Shape:
Taller than wider
Wider than tall
+
+++
++++
++
Echogenicity:
Hyper / isoechognic
Hypoechogenic
Marked hypoechogenic
++++
+++
+
+
+++
++++
Internal contents:
Cystic
Mixed solid and cystic
++++
+++
+
++
Halos:
Thin halo
Incomplete thick halo
No halos
++++
+
+
++
+++
+++
Calcification:
Coarse calcification
Microcalcification
Eggshell calcification
+++
++
+++
+
++++
++
Margin:Smooth
Poorly defined
Spiculated
+++
++
+
++
+++
++++
42
Doppler:
Internal flow pattern
Peripheral flow pattern
++
+++
+++
++
Sonoelastography:
Pattern 1 &2
Pattern 3 & 4
++++
+
+
++++
Sonoelastography:
Sonoelastography is a new sonographic technique used to evaluate the thyroid
nodules. It is also called as elastosonography. The physical characteristics of the
tissues are altered by pathologic processes. Based on this principle the
sonoelastography provides information about the tissue elasticity. During the
ultrasound examination, sonoelastographic measurements are performed by using the
same ultrasound machine and the same transducer. The sonographic images are
obtained before and after tissue compression and track tissue displacement by
assessing the propagation of the beam, providing accurate measurement of tissue
distortion. The ultrasound elastogram is displayed over the typical B – mode gray –
scale ultrasound scan in a color scale and classified by using the elasticity score. There
are four elastographic patterns are described as follows:
Pattern 1: elasticity in the whole nodule.
Pattern 2: large part of the nodule show elasticity with inconstant appearance of
anelastic areas
43
Pattern 3: constant presence of large anelastic areas at periphery.
Pattern 4: uniformly anelastic.
78 – 100 % of benign nodules show pattern 1 to 2, whereas 88 – 96 % of
malignant nodules show pattern 3 to 4. The free hand compression applied on the neck
region is standardized by real-time measurement displayed on a numerical scale to
maintain an intermediate level optimal for elastographic evaluation. This will
minimise the intraobserver and interobserver variability2.
ii) FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY:
Fine needle aspiration cytology is the most effective method for diagnosis of
thyroid cancer. It is an invasive procedure used for collection of tissue samples for
cytopathological examination. It provides more direct information than any other
diagnostic procedure. The following instruments are used for fine needle aspiration.
NEEDLES:
Standard disposable 27 – 22 gauge (0.4 – 07 mm) with 30- 50 mm long needles
are used for superficial palpable lesions. 27 gauge needles are used for cell-rich and
vascular tissues such as lymph nodesand thyroids and also in children and in sensitive
areas such as eyelid, orbit, genitals etc…
For deeper tissues 22 gauge, 90 mm disposable lumbar puncture needles with
trocar or 22 gauge 150 or 250 mm chiba needles are used for taking specimen from
deeper tissues.
44
SYRINGES AND SYRINGE HOLDER:
Standard disposable plastic syringes mounted in a syringe holder / pistol grip
are suitable for conventional aspiration biopsy. The holder leaves one hand free to feel
and fix the target which allows better precision in placing the needle.
CONTAINERS AND SLIDES:
Small sterile containers which contain physiological saline or a transport
media such as Hank’s balanced salt solution with tightly closed lids should be in hand.
Special culture media may be used in certain circumstances.
FIXATIVES AND STAINS:
Smears are air-dried or wet fixed. Routine wet fixatives should be available at
all the time. 70 – 90 % ethanol is the commonly used routine fixative. Glutaraldehyde
and 10% buffered formalin should be used for the fragments to be examined under
electron microscope. A set of Diff – Quik stains in suitable container should be
available at all time.
Other instruments like skin disinfectant, sterile dressings, local anesthetic
agent, electric torch, tongue depressor, sterile scaple blades all should be available on
the biopsy tray. Latex gloves and face masks should also be available.
PATIENT PREPARATION:
The procedure and the complications of the procedure should be clearly
explained to the patient before getting the consent and the cooperation from the
45
patient. Local anesthesia is often warranted to avoid the unwanted movements or jerks
by the patient during the procedure.
BIOPSY PROCEDURE:
FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY WITH ASPIRATION:
The thyroid nodules with suspicious ultrasound features are selected for biopsy.
In case of multiple thyroid nodules or in case of nodules with no suspicious ultrasound
features the largest thyroid nodule is selected for biopsy.
The needle should be placed accurately after feeling the consistency of the
tissue through the needle. The plunger is pulled to apply the negative pressure inside
the tissue. The needle should be passed through the tissue in a near vertical pathway
which is less painful and allow better appreciation of depth. The ultrasonographic
guidance also can be used for this purpose. Then the needle is moved back and forth
inside the target tissue to aspirate the sample. After aspirating the tissue the negative
pressure is released while the needle remains in the target tissue. Then the needle is
withdrawn from the tissue and air drawn into the syringe after detaching the needle.
Then the sample had blown onto the microscopy slide.
FINE NEEDLE SAMPLING WITHOUT ASPIRATION:
In this the needle is inserted into the target tissue and then the needle is moved
back and forth, varying the angle. Then the needle is withdrawn and the needle is
attached to the syringe and then the sample is blown onto the microscopy slide.
46
After placing the tissue onto the microscope slide tissue processing is done.
The tissue should be fixed with appropriate fixative and then stained with necessary
stain10
.
There are two types of smears can be obtained. Dry sample can be smeared by
placing the tissue on the specimen slide. Then the sample is smeared with the flat of a
second slide by exerting a little pressure as it is moved along the specimen slide. The
pressure should be adjusted to achieve a thin, even spread smear. In a wet smearing
method the smearing slide is held against the specimen slide at blunt angle near one
end of the slide, so that the fluid accumulate in the angle. Then the smearing slide is
rapidly moved along the specimen slide so that the fluid is left behind while the cells
tend to follow the smearing slide. Then the concentrated cells are smeared with the
flat of the slide as for a dry aspirate. The wet smear should be immediately fixed with
95% alcohol.
Fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules has sensitivity of 65 – 98 %,
specificity of 72 – 100 %, false negative rate of 1 – 11 % and false positive rate of 1 –
8 %10
.
COMPLICATIONS OF FNA11
:
The fine needle aspiration is complicated by localized pain which may be
referred to ipsilateral ear. It also can be complicated by haemorrhage and localized
hematoma formation.
47
PITFALLS IN FNA12
:
1. Inadequate specimen collection can lead to failure of the procedure.
2. The accuracy of the cytopathological interpretation.
3. Accuracy of the specimen.
4. Hurtle cell lesion; follicular lesions may not be clearly demarcated.
ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY:
The ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy has the advantage that it allows
continuous real-time monitoring of the needle. This helps in taking the biopsy of small
lesions. A 25-gauge needle is used for this purpose employing either capillary action
or minimal suction with a syringe. Sonographic guidance is recommended in the
following situations:
1. When the physical examination shows inconclusive or questionable
nodules.
2. Patients with normal thyroid gland on physical examination but has
sonographically demonstrated nodules. Patients with family history of MEN
II syndrome, previous history of head and neck irradiation are at high risk
for thyroid cancer. These patients usually have normal thyroid gland with
sonographically demonstrated nodules.
3. When the biopsy performed under direct palpation is inconclusive or
nondiagnostic.
Sonographically guided fine needle aspiration is also useful in the early diagnosis of
recurrent or metastatic disease in the neck after previous thyroid resection for
48
carcinoma. Sonography guidance is also needed in patients who underwent
hemithyroidectomy for benign nodule which shows occult malignant tumor in the
surgically resected specimen to exclude the existence of residual nodule in the
contralateral lobe2.
iii) CONCEPT OF TIRADS:
Fine needle aspiration cytology is the confirmatory procedure for the thyroid
nodules to rule out whether the nodule is benign or malignant. But the major
disadvantage of the procedure is that it is an invasive procedure. So various studies
have been undertaken in the initial assessment of thyroid nodule to standardize the
ultrasound based thyroid imaging to make the diagnosis and to help the surgeons to
plan the treatment protocol.
American college of radiology designed a classification system for breast
lesions called Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS). The BI-RADS
help to standardise breast imaging reports and management of breast lesions. BI-
RADS classification categories range from 1 (negative finding) to 6 (known proved
malignancy). Categories 2-5 are distinguished according to the level of suspicion for
malignancy. According to BI-RADS definitions, category 2 has less than 2%
malignant risk. Categories 4a, 4b, 4c have a malignancy risk of 2 – 10 %, 10 – 50 %,
50 – 95 % respectively. Category 5 has more than 95% of malignancy risk. Based on
BI-RADS another imaging system called Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data
System (TIRADS) has been developed for the assessment of thyroid nodules and to
standardise the thyroid imaging system for thyroid lesions.In addition TIRADS saves
49
the unnecessary FNACs from clearly benign lesions thus saving time and resources
besides ensuring uniformity in reporting and interpretation13
.
V) REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES BASED ON TIRADS OR SINGLE /
MULTIPLE ULTRASOUND FEATURES:
A study has been conducted to develop a practical TIRADS to categorize
thyroid nodules and to stratify their malignancy risk. In this study thyroid nodules
with atleast 1 cm in maximum diameter were considered. These nodules were
described sonographically according to internal component, echogenicity, margins,
calcifications and shape. Then ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was
performed with 23 – gauge needle attached to a 2 ml disposable plastic syringe and
aspiration. The aspirated material were expelled onto glass slides and smeared. These
smears were placed immediately in 95% alcohol for papanicolaon staining. Then the
cytology reports were classified as benign, indeterminate, suspicious for carcinoma,
malignant or inadequate. Then the benign or malignant thyroid nodules were
compared according to ultrasound features by using Chi square test.
The benign nodules are larger (20.7 mm ± 11.4 mm) than malignant nodules
(15.5 ± 7.5 mm) and benign nodules are seen in older patients (51.2 ± 12.3) than the
malignant nodules(47.5 ± 13.7). Solid component, hypoechogenicity, marked
hypoechogenicity, microlobulated or irregular margins, microcalcifications, taller than
wider shape all showed significant association with malignancy. Multivariate analysis
showed the risk of malignancy increased as the number of suspicious ultrasound
features increased. The values of fitted probabilities and risk of malignancy were
50
0.02 – 0.028 and 0.017 for the nodules with no suspicious ultrasound features
respectively. The nodules with one, two, three suspicious ultrasound features had the
probability and risk of malignancy 0.036 – 0.127 and 0.033, 0.068 – 0.378 and 0.092,
0.21 – 0.771 and 0.444 respectively. The nodules with four and all five suspicious
ultrasound features had the probability and risk of malignancy 0.57 – 0.919 and 0.724,
0.887 – 0.979 and 0.875 respectively. Among the suspicious ultrasound features solid
component alone have the fitted probability of malignancy ranges from 0.036 – 0.05.
Hypoechogenicity have the 0.039 – 0.054, microlobulated margin and
microcalcifications have 0.127 and 0.109 respectively. Based on these findings
TIRADS category has been created. Category 3 has no suspicious ultrasound feature.
Category 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 has one, two, three or four and five suspicious ultrasound
features respectively. So the risk of malignancy was determined according to the
number of suspicious ultrasound features13
.
Ultrasonography is commonly used for the initial assessment of thyroid
nodules. Various kinds of features seen in ultrasonography may favour the benignity
or malignity. These features include internal component of the nodule, margins,
echogenicity, calcification and the shape. A study was conducted to access the risk of
malignancy for these features seen in ultrasonography. Then these nodules were
categorized into TIRADS category.
In this study all thyroid nodules were investigated by ultrasound scan by using
a linear array transducer (5 – 12 MHz). Then all thyroid nodules were categorized
according to the following features.
51
1. Shape – taller than wider or wider than taller.
2. Echogenicity – hyper echogenicity, iso echogenicity, hypo or marked
hypoechogenicity.
3. Internal component – solid, mixed or cystic.
4. Calcification – micro calcification (< 3 mm), macro calcification (> 3 mm)
5. Margins – circumscribed, lobulated or irregular.
After ultrasound assessment all thyroid nodules were examined by ultrasound guided
fine needle aspiration cytolgy. The procedure was performed by the same radiologist
who has done the ultrasound, using 23 gauge needle attached to 10 ml plastic syringe.
The materials were expelled onto glass slide, smeared and sent to pathology
laboratory. The cytology reports were classified as benign, indeterminate, suspicious
for carcinoma, malignant or inadequate.
The high suspicious features of malignancy in ultrasound include taller than wide
shape, microcalcifications, marked hypoechogenicity, irregular or microlobulated
margins. According to the cytology and ultrasound reports the following TIRADS
classification has been proposed.
TIRADS 1: Normal thyroid ultrasound.
TIRADS 2: Benign nodules. This category includes simple cyst, isolated
macrocalcification, subacute thyroiditis, spongiform nodules and white knight aspects.
TIRADS 3: Probably benign nodules. The nodules with no high suspicious features
and the isoechogenic and hyperechogenic nodules are included in this category.
52
TIRADS 4A: The nodules with no high suspicious features, and moderately
hypoechogenic nodules are included in this category.
TIRADS 4B: The nodules with one or two high suspicious features with no
lymphadenopathy are included in this category.
TIRADS 5: The nodules with three or more than three high suspicious features
with or without lymphadenopathy are included in this category.
After the cytological results the risk of malignancy were calculated for each
TIRADS category. Totally 430 patients were selected for the study. Out of 430
patients 23 cases were proved to be malignant cytologically. Total numbers of cases
included in TIRADS category 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 5 are 83, 226, 101, 19and 1 respectively.
The risk of malignancy for each category is 0%, 2.2%, 5.9%, 57.9% and 100%
respectively.
The odds ratio was calculated for each of the major ultrasound features. The
odds ratio for benign and malignant cytology for the nodules with irregular margins is
0.21, 22.40 respectively. Nodules with taller than wider shape shows odds ratio of
19.50 for malignant nodules. Odds ratio for benign cytology is 0.43, for malignant
cytology is 15.24 for the nodules with microcalcification. Nodules with marked
hypoechogenicity showed odds ratio for benign and malignant cytology is 0.42, 12.75
respectively.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value
for irregular margin are 34.78%, 99.51%, 80%, 96.43% respectively. For taller than
wide shape sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive
53
value are 4.35%, 100%, 100% and 94.87% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity,
positive predictive value and negative predictive value for microcalcification are
30.4%, 98.8%, 58.3% and 96.2% respectively. For marked hypoechogenicity
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value are
13.04%, 99.51%, 60% and 95.29% respectively14
.
In another study it was stated that the sonographic features of papillary
carcinoma of thyroid include hypoechoic texture (86%), microcalcification (42%),
well defined margins (47%), and intrinsichypervascularity (69%). This also includes
some uncommon features like irregular margins, hypovascularity, coarse or peripheral
calcifications.
Out of 29 lesions which showed calcifications, 69% (20 cases) had
microcalcifictions; 17% (5 cases) had coarse calcifications and 1 patient had
peripheral calcification.
Out of 55 patients analysed sonographically, 54% of cases had atleast one
uncommon feature. 87% of patients had solid lesions whereas the remaining patients
had either cystic elements or predominantly cystic architecture.
Colour Doppler sonography of those patients showed primarily intrinsic flow
pattern in 43 lesions, whereas the remaining 12 lesions showed perinodular flow15
.
In another study the author took antero-posterior and transverse diameter of the
nodules, microcalcification, blurred margin, hypoechogenicity into account for
predicting the malignant risk of thyroid nodules.
54
The author stated that in small nodules (≤ 0.5 cm) the most accurate
sonographic feature forpredicting papillary thyroid carcinoma is antero-posterior to
transverse diameter ratio > 1 with sensitivity 81.4%, specificity 96.8%. Whereas in
larger nodules (> 1 cm), the microcalcifications showed higher sensitivity.
Hypoechogenicity and blurred margins had the sensitivity of 95.3% and 97.7%
respectively, but has low specificity (19.4% and 29.9% respectively) in predicting
papillary thyroid carcinoma in small thyroid nodules. So the ratio between antero-
posterior and transverse diameter along with other sonographic features help in the
diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma in small nodules16
.
According to the cytology the thyroid nodules can be classified into benign
(negative for cancer), suspicious for thyroid cancer, indeterminate, malignant (positive
for cancer) or unsatisfactory (non diagnostic).
Fine needle aspiration cytology which is an invasive procedure is considered to
be unnecessary for the detection of thyroid carcinoma. Because only 4% (1 – 10%)
lesions have the probability to be malignant. The fine needle aspiration cytology also
has indeterminate results because of low cellularity, small size and cystic nature of
nodules or due to inexperience of the operator performing the fine needle aspiration
cytology.
Sonographically internal content of the nodule, echogenicity, shape,
calcifications, echotexture, margin, capsular invasion, halo are considered to classify
thyroid nodules as probably benign, suspicious for malignancy and indeterminate17
.
55
The most common clinical feature of papillary thyroid carcinoma is solitary
thyroid nodule. Hypoehoic solid lesion with microcalcification and internal
vascularity are the features suggestive of papillary thyroid carcinoma on sonography.
An unusual presentation of papillary thyroid carcinoma has been reported in which the
papillary thyroid carcinoma presented as left hip mass with predominantly cystic
nodule on sonography. Magnetic resonance imaging of the left hip mass demonstrated
destructive lesion measured 9.5 X 9.5 X 15 cm. Histopathology of the mass showed
metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma confirmed by immunohistochemistry and
positive staining for thyroid transcription factor 1. The ultrasonographic examination
of the thyroid demonstrated unilocular thick walled cystic lesion with no hypoechoic
halos or calcifications. Color Doppler showed abnormal vascularity in the thick
irregular wall. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed and
histopathology demonstrated papillary thyroid carcinoma. The sonographic
appearance of thyroid nodules did not suggest a malignant lesion and did not fit the
biopsy criteria18
.
In another study it was stated that the mean size of benign nodules is larger
than malignant nodules. The benign nodules are seen in elder patients than the
malignant nodules. There was no association has been demonstrated between sex and
malignancy. Thyroid nodules with no suspicious feature have the malignant rate of
7.30. Non parallel orientation and ill-defined margins has the malignant rate of 8.3.
Microloulated or speculated margin has 59.1; marked hypoechogenicity has 43.6
malignant rate. Microlobulated or spiculatedmargin, marked hypoechogenicity has
56
high odds ratio for malignancy. Non-parallel orientation, microcalcification, ill-
defined margin and hypoechogenicity have low odds ratio for malignancy19
.
A study has been conducted in 462 patients who had cytological report
suspicious for malignancy. Out of 462 patients 327 patients had suspicious follicular
or hurthle cell carcinoma, 125 patients had suspicious papillary carcinoma and 10
patients had other suspicious lesions (medullary carcinoma, lymphoma) in the
cytology. All the patients underwent surgery and the lesions were examined
histopathologically. The malignancy rate for the lesions suspicious for papillary
carcinoma was 77%, and for follicular/hurthle cell neoplasm was 15%. In this study it
was reported that the patient age, serum TSH level and the history of radiation
exposure are not associated with increased risk of malignancy. The study also stats
that multiple nodules carries more risk (41.1%) for malignancy than single nodules
(26.4%) and the smaller nodules carries more risk (2.6 ± 1.8 cm) than the larger
nodules (2.9 ± 1.6 cm). The risk of malignancy increased in patients who received
thyroid hormone therapy than those patients who did not receive thyroid hormone
therapy. The reason for this association is not known20
.
Study has been conducted to compare the quantitative sonoelastography to
conventional qualitative sonoelastography and sonography. In this study 98 thyroid
masses were examined by sonography and sonoelastography and the strain ratios were
calculated. The average strain of representative region of interest from lesion were
calculated and expressed as A. Then the average strain of corresponding region of
adjacent thyroid tissue was expressed as B. Then the strain ratio was calculated by the
following formula: strain ratio = B/A which reflected the stiffness of the lesion. The
57
strain ratio of more than 3.79 was considered as the predictor of the nodule
malignancy. This cut off point was decided by Receiver Operating Characteristic
(ROC)curve. The benign lesions showed strain ratio of 2.97 ± 4.35 (mean ± SD) and
the malignant lesion had 11.59 ± 10.32 with P value less than 0.0001. 43 out of 53
benign lesions had a score of 1 or 2, whereas 40 out of 45 malignant nodules had a
score of 3 or 4 with sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 85.7%, positive predictive
value 80.0%, and negative predictive value 89.5%. Sonoelastography also shows
additional information about elasticity in color on B mode images. The blue color
representing hard tissue, red and green color representing soft and medium tissue
respectively.But this method is limited by lack of standardization21
.
A study has been conducted to analyse the tumor vascularity on power Doppler
sonograms in differentiating malignant and benign solid thyroid nodules using tumor
histologic evaluation as the reference standard. In this study 86 solid thyroid
tumorswere qualitatively analysed for nodule vascularity. Increase in the level of
intranodular vascularization is associated with an increase in tumor size. Increased
intranodular vascularization has sensitivity of 65.2%, specificity of 52.5% and 58.9%
overall accuracy in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid lesions.
Resistive index characterize the arterial waveform produced on Doppler sonography,
it also not dependent on insonation angle (the angle at which the ultrasound beam
intercepts the axis of the vessel). But for the large nodules the quantitative and
qualitative criteria of vascularity shows very low accuracy because in the benign
thyroid nodules intranodular vascularity is increased with increase in tumor size22
.
58
In another study totally 675 nodules underwent biopsy. All these nodules had
the diameter between 0.8 – 4.6 cm (mean 1.96 cm; SD – 0.877 cm). Out of these 675
nodules 36 were malignant. 31 were papillary thyroid carcinoma (86.1%), 2 were
lymphoma (5.56%), 1 were medullary thyroid carcinoma (2.78%), 1 were hurthle cell
carcinoma (2.78%) and 1 were indeterminate between hyalinising trabecular adenoma
Vs papillary thyroid carcinoma. So the prevalence of malignant thyroid nodules was
5.33%. In this study the hypoechogenicity seen in 30.6% of benign lesions Vs 47.1%
of malignant lesions. Isoechogenicity seen in 61.1%, 47.1% of benign and malignant
thyroid nodules respectively. Hypoechogenicity seen in 8.3% of benign and 5.8% of
malignant lesions respectively. None of these findings are statistically significant in
differentiating benign and malignant thyroid lesions. Solid echo texture was present in
83.3% benign and 85.3% malignant lesions and also predominantly cystic nodules
were seen in 5.6% benign and 2.9% malignant lesions. 11.1% benign and 14.7%
malignant thyroid nodules had clearly defined borders and 47.2% benign and 41.1%
malignant thyroid nodules had irregular or less defined borders. None of these
findings were statistically significant.
3 out of 36 benign thyroid nodules showed grade 4 internal vascularity in color
Doppler. No malignant nodules showed flow pattern higher than grade 3. 20.6% of
malignant and 19.4% benign thyroid nodules showed intermediate grades of internal
flow. 69.4% benign and 64.7% malignant nodules showed color Doppler grade 0 or 1.
So the internal vascularity and the nodule shape also statistically not significant in
differentiating benign and malignant nodules.
59
Calcifications were seen in 5.6% benign and 35.3% malignant lesions. So the
presence of calcifications were statistically significant (p value < 0.005)to differentiate
benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The presence of calcifications in thyroid
nodules was 94.4% specific for malignancy. It also had positive predictive value of
0.857 and negative predictive value of 0.60723
.
Based on the principles of BI-RADS and TI-RADS another imaging system
has been developed for the evaluation of hepatic nodules with magnetic resonance
imaging named Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS). According to
LI-RADS hepatic nodules are divided into 5 categories. Various studies have been
conducted for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. In one study patients with
cirrhosis with sonographically newly detected hepatic solitary nodule with less than
20 mm in size were considered. The magnetic imaging and fine needle biopsy were
used as reference standard. Then the LI-RADS category was assigned to nodules seen
at magnetic resonance imaging. Out of 133 nodules evaluated 102 lesions were
hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 lesions were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 1 were
neuroendocrine metastasis and 27 were benign lesions. None of category 1 lesions
(0%), 3 out of 12 category 2 lesions (25%), 29 out of 42 category 3 lesions (69%), 24
out of 25 category 4 lesions (96%), 44 out of 45 category 5 lesions (98%) were
hepatocellular carcinomas. Two out of four lesions categorized as other malignancies
were hepatocellular carcinomas. So the LI-RADS has the sensitivity 42.3%,
specificity 97.8%, positive predictive value 97.8%, negative predictive value 47.4%
for the diagnosis of benign hepatic nodules. It also has 65.4%, 96.4%, 97.1%, 59.6%
60
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
respectively for the diagnosis of malignant nodules24
.
OBSERVATION
61
OBSERVATION
The present study has been undertaken in 200 patients presented with primary
thyroid related complaints. The patients were analysed by ultrasonography and fine
needle aspiration cytology.
Total number of patients: 200 patients
Total number of nodules analysed and assigned as per TIRADS – 227 nodules.
Total number of nodules for which FNAC was done – 200 nodules.
Total number of lesions that underwent surgical excision: 46.
Total number for which definite diagnosis by FNAC was made: 154
Ultrasonographically the thyroid nodules were evaluated for shape (wider than
taller, taller than wider), echogenicity (isoechogenicity, hyperechogenicity,
hypoechogenicityand markedhypoechogenicity), content of the nodules (solid, mixed),
calcification (no calcification, microcalcification, macrocalcification) and margins
(smooth, irregular, microlobulated). The results are shown below.
1. SHAPE:
Out of 200 nodules evaluated 194 nodules were wider than taller in shape and 6
nodules were taller than wider in shape. Among the 194 nodules which were
wider than taller in shape 184 nodules showed benignity on FNAC report. The
remaining 10 nodules were malignant in nature on FNAC. All the nodules
which showed taller than wider in shape showed malignant character.
62
According to the current study the nodules which had wider than taller shape
have 94.1% chances of benignity and 5.1% chances of malignancy. The
nodules which had taller than wider shape have 100% chances of malignancy.
Table: 2. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon the Shape
S.No Shape Benign Malignant
1 Wider than taller 184 10
2 Taller than wider 0 6
Figure: 26. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending upon the
Shape
94.84%
5.20%0%
100%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
Benign Malignant
1 Wider than taller
2 Taller than wider
63
2. ECHOGENICITY:
Ultrasonographically 172 thyroid nodules showed either isoechogenicity or
hyperechogenicity, 16 nodules showed hypoechogenicity and the remaining 12
nodules demonstrated marked hypoechogenicity. All the 172 nodules which
had iso or hyperechogenicity on USG have demonstrated benignity on FNAC.
Among the 16 nodules which had hypoechogenicity 12 nodules were benign
and 4 were malignant on FNAC. All the nodules which showed marked
hypoechogenicity were malignant. So the nodules with iso or
hyperechogenicity on USG are benign in 100% cases. The nodules with
hypoechogenicity have 75% chances of benignity and 25% chances of
malignancy. The nodules with marked hypoechogenicity have 100% chances of
malignancy.
Table: 3. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon Echogenicity
S. No ECHOGENICITY BENIGN MALIGNANT
1. ISO /
HYPERECHOGENICITY
172 0
2. HYPOECHOGENICITY 12 4
3. MARKED
HYPOECHOGENICITY
0 12
64
Figure: 27. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending
upon Echogenicity
3. CONTENT:
Ultrasonographically 102 nodules were solid in nature and 98 nodules
demonstrated mixed content (solid and cystic). Out of 102 nodules which were
Table: 4. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon Content
S.No CONTENT BENIGN MALIGNANT
1. SOLID 86 16
2. MIXED (SOLID AND
CYSTIC)
98 0
100%75%
0%0% 25%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
ISO / HYPERECHOGENICITY
HYPOECHOGENICITY MARKED HYPOECHOGENICITY
1 2 3
BENIGN MALIGNANT
65
solid in nature 86 nodules were benign and 16 nodules were malignant on
FNAC. So the nodules which have solid content have 84.3% chances of
benignity and 15.7% chances of malignancy and the nodules which have mixed
content have 100% chances of benignity.
Figure: 28. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending
upon the Content
4. CALCIFICATION:
Out of the 200 nodules analysed 176 nodules had no calcification 10 had
macrocalcification and 14 had microcalcification. The nodules which had no
calcification have 97.7% chances of benignity (172 nodules were benign on
FNAC) and 2.3% chances of malignancy (4 nodules were malignant on
FNAC). The nodules which had macrocalcification have 100% probability of
benignity (all 10 nodules had benign character on FNAC). The nodules which
have microcalcification have 85.7% chances of malignancy (12 nodules were
84.31%
15.68%
100%
0%0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
BENIGN MALIGNANT
1 SOLID
2 MIXED (SOLID AND CYSTIC)
66
malignant on FNAC) and 14.3% chances of benignity (2 nodules were benign
on FNAC).
Table: 5. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon Calcification
S. No CALCIFICATIONS BENIGN MALIGNANT
1. NO CALCIFICATION 172 4
2. MACROCALCIFICATION 10 0
3. MICROCALCIFICATION 2 12
Figure: 29. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending
upon the Calcification
97.72% 100%
14.28%2.27% 0%
85.71%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
NO CALCIFICATION MACROCALCIFICATION MICROCALCIFICATION
BENIGN MALIGNANT
67
5. MARGIN:
Among the 200 nodules 140 nodules had smooth margin, 52 nodules had
irregular margin and 8 nodules had microlobulated margin on USG. The
nodules which had smooth margin on USG have 98.6% chances of benignity
Table: 6. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon the Margin
S.NO MARGIN BENIGN MALIGNANT
1 SMOOTH 138 2
2 IRREGULAR 46 6
3 MICROLOBULATED 0 8
Figure: 30. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending
upon the Margin
98.57%88.46%
0%1.42% 11.54%
100%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
SMOOTH IRREGULAR MICROLOBULATED
BENIGN MALIGNANT
68
(138 nodules were benign) and 1.4 chances of malignancy on FNAC (2 nodules
were malignant). The nodules which had irregular margin have 88.5% chances
of benignity and 11.5 % chances of malignancy (46 were benign and 6 were
malignant on USG). Out of 8 nodules which had microlobulated margin all was
demonstrated malignant character on FNAC. So the nodules which have
microlobulated margin on USG have 100% chances of malignancy on FNAC.
According to the ultrasound features all the thyroid nodules were categorized into
TIRADS category. Out of the 200 nodules evaluated 140 nodules were included in
TIRADS category 3, 12 nodules in category 4a and 40 nodules in category 4b. The
remaining 8 nodules were included under category 5. All the nodules in category 3
were shown benign character on histopathology. Two nodules in category 4a and six
nodules in category 4b were malignant and all the 8 nodules in category 5 had
malignant character in histopathology.
Table: 7. Number of thyroid nodules depending upon TIRADS category
S.No TIRADS category Benign Malignant Total
1. TIRADS 3 140 0 140
2 TIRADS 4a 10 2 12
3 TIRADS 4b 34 6 40
4 TIRADS 5 0 8 8
69
Table: 8. Percentage of thyroid nodules depending upon TIRADS category
S.No TIRADS category Percentage of benign
nodules
Percentage of malignant
nodules (risk of
malignancy)
1. TIRADS 3 100% 0%
2. TIRADS 4a 83.3% 16.7%
3. TIRADS 4b 85% 15%
4. TIRADS 5 0% 100%
Figure: 31. Chart showing the percentage of thyroid nodules depending upon
TIRADS category
100%83.30% 85%
0%0% 16.70% 15%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
TIRADS 3 TIRADS 4a TIRADS 4b TIRADS 5
Percentage of benign nodules
Percentage of malignant nodules (risk of malignancy)
REPRESENTATIVE CASES
70
REPRESENTATIVE CASES
1. 45 years old male patient came with complaints of swelling infront of the neck for
two months. Ultrasound showed solitary thyroid nodule with following findings:
1. Wider than taller shape.
2. Iso Echogenicity
3. Solid Content
4. No Calcification
5. Smooth Margin
TIRADS Category: 3
Figure: 32. Ultrasound image of colloid goitre
FNAC report of the above mentioned nodule is Colloid goitre.
71
2. 36 years old female patient presented with complaints of swelling in front of the
neck for 3 months.Sonography of thyroid nodule showed following findings:
1. Wider than taller shape
2. IsoEcogenicity
3. Solid with Cystic changes
4. No Calcification
5. SmoothMargin
TIRADS category:3
Figure: 33 Ultrasound image of nodular goitre with cystic degeneration
FNAC report of above nodule is Nodular goitre with cystic degeneration.
72
3. 44 years old female patient presented with complaintsof neck swelling for 6
months. Ultrasonography of thyroid nodule showed the following findings:
1. Taller than wider shape
2. Solid Content
3. Marked Hypoechogenicity
4. Microcalcification
5. Smooth Margins.
TIRADS Category: 5.
Figure: 34 Ultrasound image of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
FNAC report of the above nodule is Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.
73
4.55years old female patient came with the complaints of swelling infront of the neck
for 2 months. Ultrasound of solitary thyroid nodule showed following findings:
1. Wider than taller shape
2. Solid Content.
3. Marked Hypoechogeniity
4. No Calcification
5. Smooth Margin
TIRADS category: 4B
Figure: 35. Ultrasound image of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma
Biopsy report of the above mentioned nodule is Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma.
74
5. 58 years old male patient came with the complaints of swelling infront of the neck
for 6 months.Ultrasound of thyroid nodule showed following findings:
1. Wider than taller shape
2. Solid Content
3. Marked Hypoechogenicity
4. No Calcification
5. Irregular Margin
TIRADS category: 4B
Figure: 36. Ultrasound image of Lymphoma of thyroid gland
FNAC report of the above mentioned nodule is Lymphoma of thyroid gland.
DISCUSSION
75
DISCUSSION
Malignancy of thyroid gland has the prevalence of about 5%25, 26
. In some
studies it was stated that less than 10% of thyroid nodules are malignant. In the
present study 8% of thyroid nodules were malignant on histopathology. It correlates
with the previous studies.
In a study conducted by Moifo B et al it was stated that the risk of malignancy
was increased from TIRADS category 2 to category 5. In his study he stated 0% risk
of malignancy in TIRADS category 2. TIRADS category 3, 4a, 4b had 2.2%, 5.9%,
57.9% as risk of malignancy respectively. TIRADS category 5 had 100% risk of
malignancy. In our present study no thyroid nodules were included in category 2.
Table: 9. Comparison of TIRADS category between two studies
S. No TIRADS category Risk of malignancy in
study by Moifo et al.
Risk of malignancy in
present study
1. Category 3 2.2 % 0 %
2. Category 4a 5.9 % 16.7 %
3. Category 4b 57.9 % 15 %
4. Category 5 100 % 100 %
76
Figure: 37. Chart showing the comparison of TIRADS category between two
studies
But the risk of malignancy for TIRADS category 3, 4a, 4b was 0%, 16.7%, 15%
respectively. TIRADS category 5 had 100% risk of malignancy.
Horvath et al suggested that the risk of malignancy for TIRADS category 3, 4a,
4b was less than 5%, 5 – 10%, 10 – 80% respectively. The TIRADS category 5 carries
greater than 80% risk of malignancy27
. In the present study the risk of malignancy for
TIRADS category 3, 4a, 4b, 5 was 0%, 16.7%, 15%, 100% respectively. These results
are corresponding to the previous study done by Hoverth et al expect for TIRADS
category 4a in which we had slightly increased risk for malignancy. This can be
explained by the fact that the assessment of the margins of the thyroid nodules was
subjected to inter observer variation.
There are various ultrasound features associated with increased risk of thyroid
malignancy. These features include taller-than-wider shape, irregular contour, marked
2.20% 5.90%
57.90%
100%
0%
16.70% 15%
100%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
Category 3 Category 4a Category 4b Category 5
Risk of malignancy in study by Moifo et al.
Risk of malignancy in present study
77
hypoechogenicity and the presence of microcalcifications. Presence of these features
is suspicious for malignancy.
Moifo et al reported that the presence of irregular contour of the thyroid
nodules had the sensitivity, specificity of 34.78%, 99.51% respectively. The positive
Table: 10. Comparison of two studies for irregular margin
S.No Study Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
1. Moifo B et al 34.78 99.51 80 96.43 22.40
2. Present study 37.5 75 11.54 93.24 1.71
Figure: 38. Chart showing comparison of two studies for irregular margin
34.78
99.51
80
96.43
22.4
37.5
75
11.54
93.24
1.710
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
Moifo B et al Present study
78
predictivevalue and negative predictive value for the irregular contour of the nodule
are 80%, 96.43% respectively with the odds ratio 22.40 (CI – 12.47 – 40.23). In our
present study presence of irregular margin has sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value is 37.5%, 75%, 11.54%, 93.24%
respectively with the odds ratio 1.71 (CI – 0.65 – 4.47).
In our present study we also analysed the sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and the negative predictive value for the microlobulated margin.
These values are 50%, 100%, 100%, 95.83% respectively. Odds ratio for the
microlobulated margin is 24 (CI – 12.18 – 47.30) according to the current study.
Kwak el al reported that the odds ratio for microlobulated margin is 20.135 (CI –
14.038 – 28.880).
Moifo B et al reported that the thyroid nodules with taller-than-wider shape had
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 4.35%,
Table: 11. Comparison of two studies for taller-than-wider shape
S.No Study Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
1. Moifo B et
al
4.35 100 100 94.87 19.50
2. Present
study
37.5 100 100 94.84 19.40
79
100%, 100%, 94.81% respectively with odds ratio of 19.50. In our present study
taller-than-wider shape have sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and
negative predictive value 37.5%, 100%, 100%, 94.84% respectively. The odds ratio
for taller-than-wider nodule is 19.4 (CI – 10.61 – 35.48).
Figure: 39. Chart showing comparison of two studies for taller-than-wider shape
So the results of the current study corresponds to the study done by Moifo B et
al. according to both the studies nodules with taller-than-wider shape carries around
19.40 times increased risk of being malignancy than the nodules without taller-than-
wider shape.
In our current study the presence of microcalcification have sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 75%, 98.91%,
85.71%, 97.85% respectively. It also has the odds ratio 20.35 (CI – 10.00 – 41.45). So
according to the current study presence of microcalcification carry 20.35 times
4.35
100 10094.87
19.5
37.5
100 10094.84
19.4
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
Moifo B et al Present study
80
increased risk of malignancy. Moifo B et al had sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value 30.4%, 98.8%, 58.3%, 96.2%
Table: 12. Comparison of two studies for Microcalcification
S.No Study Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
1. Moifo B et
al
30.4 98.8 58.3 96.2 15.24
2. Present
study
75 100 100 97.87 20.35
Figure: 40. Chart showing comparison of two studies for Microcalcification
30.4
98.8
58.3
96.2
15.24
75
100 100 97.87
20.35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
Moifo B et al Present study
81
respectively. In that study the odds ratio for microcalcification is 15.24 (CI – 7.74 –
30.02). So according to both the studies presence of microcalcification carries higher
risk of malignancy than the nodules without microcalcification.
In our present study presence of marked hypoechogenicity has sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 75%, 100%, 100%,
97.87% respectively with the odds ratio 47 ( CI – 17.83 – 123.92). So the thyroid
nodules with marked hypoechogenicity has 47 times increased risk of malignancy
than the nodules without marked hypoechogenicity. Moifo B et al had sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 13.04%, 99.51%,
60%, 95.29% respectively with odds ratio 12.75 (CI – 5.54 – 29.35).
Table: 13. Comparison of two studies for marked hypoechogenicity
S.No Study Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
1. Moifo B et
al
13.04 99.51 60 95.29 12.75
2. Present
study
75 100 100 97.87 47
82
Figure: 41. Chart showing comparison of two studies for marked
hypoechogenicity
In another study done by Kwak et al the odds ratio for marked
hypoechogenicity, microlobulated margins, irregular margins, microcalcification and
Figure: 42.Chart showing comparison of odds ratio for suspicious ultrasound
features
13.04
99.51
60
95.29
12.75
75
100 100 97.87
47
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) OR
Moifo B et al Present study
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
MH ML Margin IR Margin MIC CAL TTW
1.Moifo B et al
2.Kwak et al
3.Present study
83
Table: 14. Comparison of odds ratio for suspicious ultrasound features
Marked
Hypoechogenicity
(MH)
Microlobulated
(ML) Margin
Irregular
(IR)
Margin
Micro
calcification
(MIC CAL)
Taller-than-
wider (TTW)
shape
1.Moifo
B et al
12.75 - 22.40 15.24 19.50
2.Kwak
et al
69.756 20.135 113.828 25.871 24.478
3.Present
study
47 24 1.71 20.35 19.4
taller-than-wider shape was 69.756 (CI – 37.216 – 130.747), 20.135 (CI – 14.038 –
28.880), 113.828 (CI – 60.771 – 213.205), 25.871 (CI – 17.503 – 38.240), 24.478 (CI
- 17.152 – 34.933). According to this study all the above mentioned sonographic
features are associated with increased risk of malignancy.
According to the current study taller-than-wider shape, marked
hypoechogenicity and the microlobulated margins in ultrasonography are 100%
specific for malignancy. There are certain sonographic features consistently associated
with benign nodules. These features include isoechogenicity or hyperechogeicity,
mixed (solid and cystic) content of the nodules and the presence of macrocalcification.
These sonographic features help to exclude the malignant thyroid nodules. However
84
there are rare exceptions like cystic necrosis of papillary carcinoma which was not
encountered in our study.
CONCLUSION
85
CONCLUSION
The present studyhas been undertaken to classify the thyroid nodules into
various TIRADS category and to analyse the suspicious sonographic features with the
histopathological reports to assess the risk of malignancy for the suspicious
sonographic features and to assess the risk of malignancy for each TIRADS category.
This also helps to reduce the incidence of unnecessary FNAC procedures.
According to the present study TIRADS category 3 has 0% risk of malignancy
and category 5 has 100% risk of malignancy. So the risk of malignancy increases from
TIRADS category 3 to TIRADS category 5. So the thyroid nodules which are
included in TIRADS category 3 or less than 3 do not need FNAC. They need short
term follow up every 6 months to document stability of the lesion. Since thyroid
malignancies grow slowly, follow up for atleast 2 years is warranted. Only the nodules
included in TIRADS category 4 and 5 require biopsy to differentiate the benign from
malignant thyroid nodules.
The sonographic features like irregular margins, microlobulated margins,
marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcification and taller-than-wider shape are all
associated with increased risk of malignancy. Presence of microlobulated margins,
marked hypoechogenicity and taller-than-wide shaped nodules are 100% specific for
malignancy. Sonographic features like isoechogenicity or hyperechogenicity, mixed
(solid and cystic) content of the nodule, macrocalcificationare predictive of benignity.
86
In conclusion high resolution ultrasound is an accurate technique to assess the
morphology of thyroid nodules. Describing the findings using standard lexicon and
categorizing using TIRADS achieves the following.
i. It ensures objectivity in reporting
ii. Malignant lesions are identified with high accuracy
iii. It aids in clinical decision making
iv. It prevents unnecessary FNACs.
v. This avoids unnecessary patient discomfort, cost and wastage of resources.
SUMMARY
87
SUMMARY
Ultrasonography is commonly used for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. But
reporting of thyrosonogramis often vague, subjective and inconclusive. Taking this
problem into account this study has been undertaken to improve the sensitivity,
specificity of the ultrasonography and to classify the thyroid nodules into five major
categories based on Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (TIRADS) for the
diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules.
The patients coming to Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore
with the complaint of thyroid nodules have been evaluated sonographically for the
suspicious ultrasonographic features of thyroid malignancy. Then these nodules were
subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology and the results were obtained from
pathology department.
These results were analysed and compared with the suspicious sonographic
features to assess the risk of malignancy for each TIRADS category and for each
suspicious feature. These results were also compared with the previous literature it
was concluded that the sonographic features like taller than wider shape, irregular
margin, microlobulated margin, microcalcification and marked hypoechogenicity are
all associated with increased risk of thyroid malignancy. By designating an
appropriate TIRADS category, the highly suspicious nodules (category 4 and 5)are
sampled by FNAC or dealt with surgery immediately, while category 3 lesions are
followed up. Category 2 lesions do not require any further investigations. This is
analogous to the stratification of breast lesion by BIRADS.
ANNEXURE –I CONSENT FORM
88
CONSENT FORM
You, Shri./ Smt./ Kum. _________________________, aged ____ years, S/o / D/o /
W/o ___________________________, residing at ________________
_______________________________________ are requested to be a participant in
the research study titled “Assessment of malignant risk potential of thyroid nodules
using Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System(TIRADS)criteria with
correlation by Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC)/Excision biopsy” conducted
by Dr.THAIYAL NAYAKI.S., one of the post graduate trainees in the Dept. of
Radiodiagnosis, Govt. Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore. You
are eligible for the study as per the inclusion criteria. You can ask her any question or
seek from her any clarifications about the study which you may have before agreeing
to participate in the study.
TOPIC OF THE RESEARCH
Assessment of malignant risk potential of thyroid nodules using ultrasound Thyroid
Imaging Reporting And Data System(TIRADS)criteria with correlation by Fine
Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAB)/Excision biopsy.
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH
To develop a practical Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(TIRADS)
from which to categorize the thyroid nodules and stratify their malignant risk.
89
PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN THE STUDY
Fetching baseline characteristics of the patient like age, gender etc.
Proper history pertaining to the patient’s complaints.
Collecting thyroid profile reports(if applicable)
Ultrasonography of thyroid for localising and characterisation of thyroid nodules.
Ultrasonography guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of thyroid nodules.
Continued follow-up of patient and collecting Biopsy reports for analyzing them with
sonographic findings.
Recordingall theabove variants/events into the database and analyzing them by
statistical methods to arrive at our objectives.
DECLINING FROM PARTICIPATION
You are hereby made aware that participation in this study is purely voluntary and
honorary, and that you have all the rights to decline from participating in it.
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
You are hereby assured that your privacy is respected. Any information about you or
provided by you during the study will be kept strictly confidential.
90
AUTHORIZATION TO PUBLISH RESULTS
Results of the study may be published for scientific purposes and/or presented to
scientific groups. In any case, neither will your identity be revealed nor will your
privacy be breached.
STATEMENT OF CONSENT
I, _____________________, do hereby volunteer and consent to participate in this
study being conducted by Dr.THAIYALNAYAKI.S. I have read and understood the
consent form (or) it has been read and explained to me thoroughly. I am fully aware of
the study details as well as aware that I may ask questions to her at any time.
Signature / Left Thumb Impression of the patient
Station: Coimbatore
Date:
Signature / Left Thumb Impression and Name of the witness
Station: Coimbatore
Date:
BIBLIOGRAPHY
91
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. DattaA K. Essentials of Human Anatomy, Head and Neck, 5th
edn, Chapter 7;
Deep structures of neck, Current books international: Kolkata, 2009; 160-6.
2. Rumack C M, Wilson S R et al. Diagnostic Ultrasound, Volume 1, 4th
edn,
Chapter 18; The thyroid gland, ELSEVIER: Chaina, 2011; 708-46.
3. Michael M, Dean S et al., Diagnostic imaging techniques in thyroid cancer,
American journal of surgery, 1988; 155: 215-20.
4. Charles B H et al. MR imaging of thyroid, ATR, 1993; 140: 455-60.
5. Singh I B. Textbook of human Histology, 4th
edn. The Endocrine System,
JAYPEE Brothers, Medical Publishers (P) Ltd: New Delhi, 2002; 306-8.
6. DattaA K. Essentials of Human Embryology, 6th
edn, Chapter 12; The
Alimentary System, Current books international: Kolkatta, 2010; 116-7.
7. Barrett K E, Barman S M et al. Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology,
24th
edn. The Endocrine System, Tata Mcgraw Hill education (P) Ltd: New
Delhi, 2012; 339-50.
8. Lloyd R, Delellin R et al. Pathology and genetics of tumors of endocrine
organs. USA: 2004: 45. Available from URL lhp://www.jarc.fr/who-blue books
/ index.wtml.
9. Abbas A K, Fausto N et al. Robbin’s Pathological basis of diseases, 8th
edn.
Endocrine system, Elsevier: New Delhi, 2013; 1118 – 26.
10. Orell S R, Sterrett G F et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology, 5th
edn. The
technique of FNA cytology, Churchill livingstone, Elsevier: New york, 2012; 8
– 14.
92
11. Hales M S, Hsu M Set al. Needle tract implantation of Papillary carcinoma of
the thyroid following aspiration biopsy, Actacytol 2002; 34:801.
12. SahaA et al. Controversies in the management of thyroid nodules.
Laryngoscope, 2000; 110: 183 – 93.
13. Kawk Y J, Han H K et al. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for US
features of Nodules: A step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk,
RSNA, 2011; vol 260: 892 – 99.
14. Moifo B, Takoeta et al. Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data
System (TIRADS) classification in Differentiation Benign from Malignant
Thyroid Nodules, Open Journal of Radiology, 2013; 3: 103 – 7.
15. Chan K B, Desser T S et al. Common and uncommon sonographic features of
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2003; vol. 22
(10): 1083 – 90.
16. RenJ, Liu B et al. A Taller-Than-Wide shape is a good predictor of Papillary
Thyroid Carcinoma in small solid nodules, J Ultrasound Med, 2015; 34: 19 –
26.
17. Acharya U R, Swapna G et al. A review on ultrasound based thyroid cancer
tissue characterization and automated classification technology in cancer
research and treatment, ISSN 1533 – 0346, 2014; vol 13 (4): 289 - 301
18. Liu Y I, Shin L K et al. An Unusual Imaging and clinical Presentation of
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, Journal of ultrasound in Medicine, 2008; vol 27
(8): 1241 – 44.
93
19. Kwak J Y, Jung I et al. Image Reporting and characterization system for
ultrasound features of Thyroid nodules: Multicentric Korean Retrospective
Study, Korean J Radiol, 2013; 14(1):110 -17.
20. Castro M R, Espiritu R P et al. Predictors of Malignancy in patients with
cytologically suspicious Thyroid Nodules, Irish Journal of Medical Science,
2014; vol 183: 633 – 37.
21. Xing P, Wu L et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, Journal
of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2011; vol 30: 663 – 9.
22. Lyshchik A, Moses R et al. Quantitative analysis of tumor vascularity in benign
and malignant solid thyroid nodules, Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2007,
vol 26 (6): 837 – 46.
23. Iannuccilli J D, Cronan J J et al. Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as
assessed by sonographic criteria, Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2004; vol
23(11): 1455 – 64.
24. Darnell A, Fornet A et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR
imaging: Evaluation in nodules 20 mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at
screening US, RSNA, 2015; vol 275 (3).
25. Kim K M, Park J B et al. Ultrasonographic guideline for thyroid nodules
cytology: Single institute experience, Journal of the Korean surgical society,
2013; vol 84 (2): 73-9.
26. Dean D S et al. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules, Best practice and Research:
clinical endocrinology and metabolism, Journal of radiology, 2012; vol 262(3):
901-11.
94
27. Horvath E, Majlis S et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid
nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management, The journal of clinical
endocrinology and metabolism, 2009; vol 9 (5): 1748-51.
-
ANNEXURE –II MASTER CHART
95
KEY TO MASTER CHART
NS – Neck Swelling
DR – Duration
CV – Change of Voice
DG – Dysphagia
DN – Dysphea
P – Pain
SN – Single Nodule
MN – Multiple Nodule
M – Month
Y – Year
S – Shape
E – Echogenicity
C – Content
CAL – Calcification
M – Margin
TTW – Taller-than-wider
WTT – Wider than taller
HR – Hyperechogenicity
IS – Isoechogenicity
HO – Hypoechogenicity
96
MHO – Marked Hypoechogenicity
SD – Solid
MX – Mixed
CY – Cystic
AB – Absent
MIC – Microcalcification
MAC – Macrocalcification
SO – Smooth
IR – Irregular margin
ML – Microlobulated margin
NCG – Nodular Colloid Goiter
CdNG – Cystic degeneration of Nodular Goiter
CdCG – Cystic degeneration of Colloid Goiter
CdNCG – Cystic degeneration of Nodular Colloid Goiter
NG – Nodular Goiter
CG – Colloid Goiter
PTC – Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
FTC – Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma
FPTC – Follicular variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
L - Lymphoma
97
MASTER CHART
S.No NAME Age/Sex Clinical Findings USG Findings TIRADS
category
FNAC
Report NS DR CV DG CL P SN MN S E C CAL M
1. Akilandam 78 y / F + 6M - + - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
2. Baby 32 y / F + 4M - + - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
3. Bagyalakshmi 51 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NCG
4. Basha 38 y / M + 1Y - + - + + - WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CdNG
5. Essakiyammal 36 y / F + 4M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B CdCG
6. Eswari 45 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
7. Eswari 55 y / F + 3M + + - + + - WTT MHO SD AB ML 4B PTC
8. Ganesh 40 y / M + 8M - - - + + - WTT HO SD AB IR 4B CdNCG
9. Kalaivani 36 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
10. Ganga 40 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
11. Krishnaveni 42 y / F + 1Y - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdCG
12. Kunaladevi 31 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdCG
13. Lithy violet 50 y / F + 2Y + + + + + - TTW MHR SD MIC IR 5 PTC
14. Kavitha 27 y / F + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR SD MAC SO 3 NCG
98
15. Kondappan 53 y / M + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
16. Pushpa 52 y / F + 5M + + + + + - WTT MHO SD MIC IR 5 FTC
17. Mallika 31 y / F + 3M - - - + - + WTT HO SD AB SO 4A CG
18. Mary philomina 48 y / F + 2M + + + + + - TTW MHO SD MIC IR 5 PTC
19. Marudbaul 55 y / M + 4M - + - + + - WTT MHO SD MIC ML 5 PTC
20. Rani 44 y / F + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
21. Rihana 21 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdCG
22. Sampoorna 50 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
23. Sasikaladevi 33 y / F + 9M - + - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
24. Selvi 49 y / F + 4M - + - + + - WTT HO SD MIC IR 4B PTC
25. Shanthi 45 y / F + 3M - - - - - + WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CdNG
26. Sonia 41 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNG
27. Thilakavathi 45 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
28. Daniel 59 y / M + 2Y + - - + + - WTT MHO SD AB ML 4B FvPTC
29. Kavitha 36 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
30. Jothimani 40 y / F + 6M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
99
31. Muthulakshmi 30 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
32. Ponmani 22 y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
33. Ananthi 29 y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
34. Anitha 30 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
35. Arokyamari 60 y / F + 2Y - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNG
36. Bharathi 68 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
37. Jannamuthu 50 y / M + 6M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
38. Jeganathan 35 y / M + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
39. Jeya 36 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
40. Kannammal 49 y / F + 1M - - - + - + WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
41. Eashwari 38 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
42. Kavitha 36 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
43. Manimegalai 28 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B CdNG
44. Mary 57 y / F + 9M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
45. Shanthi 37 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
46. Sangeetha 27 y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
47. Saraswaathi 42 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
100
48. Lilly 50 y / F + 1Y - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
49. Muthulakshmi 43 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
50. Nachiyammal 63 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NCG
51. Muthulakshmi 30 y / F + 4M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
52. Pitchaikani 37 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CG
53. Thulasimani 39 y / F + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
54. Kalaimani 40 y / F + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
55. Deepa 28 y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
56. Kavitha 38 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
57. Deepa 36 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
58. Jeya 43 Y / F + 6M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
59. Veerammal 45 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
60. Shanmugam 58 y / M + 7M - + - - + - WTT MHO SD AB IR 4B L
61. Susheela 36 y / F + 2M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
62. Subhulakshmi 35 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
63. Saraswathy 45 y / F + 6M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NG
64. Subhathal 60 y / F + 1Y + - - + + - WTT HR SD MAC IR 4B NG
101
65. Nithya 36 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
66. Geetha 54 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdNG
67. Arokkyamary 60 y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT IS MX AB IR 4B NG
68. Pushpa 30 y / F + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
69. Jameela 60 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
70. Rukmani 40 y / F + 6M - - - + + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdNG
71. Rani 34 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
72. Mary 42 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B NG
73. Rakkaye 53 y / F + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNCG
74. Povayee 35 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
75. Kuppusamy 29 y / M + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
76. Veerammal 54 y / F + 3M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
77. Rajesh 60 y / M + 9M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
78. Meena 51 y / F + 4M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
79. Subhulakshmi 70 y / F + 5M + + + + - + TTW MHO SD MIC ML 5 PTC
80. Kannammal 45y / F + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
81. Savithiri 37 y/ F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
102
82. Sekar 62 y / M + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B NG
83. Guna 57 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR SD MIC IR 4B CdNCG
84. Rajesh 43 y / M + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR SD MAC SO 3 NCG
85. Kumar 63 y / M + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNG
86. Saraswathi 50 y / F + 5M - + + + + - TTW MHO SD MIC IR 5 PTC
87. Karthik 37 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
88. Mekala 27 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
89. Abirami 44 y / F + 9M - - - - + - WTT HO MX AB SO 4A NCG
90. Ravisankar 53 y / M + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
91. Sundari 34 y / F + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
92. Surya 63 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CG
93. Ponnammal 38 y / F + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
94. Hariharan 53 y / M + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
95. Kokila 46 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD MAC IR 4B CdNCG
96. Kannan 38 y / M + 1M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
97. Radhika 50 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CG
98. Veena 55 y / F + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
103
99. Ashwini 65 y / F + 5M + + - + - + WTT HO SD MIC ML 4B PTC
100. Roopa 53 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
101. Devi 52 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
102. Pradhap 36 y / M + 9M - - - - + - WTT HO SD MAC IR 4B NG
103. Ashok 63 y / M + 2M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
104. Praveen 49 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NCG
105. Shailaja 58 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
106. Srimathi 49 y / M + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CG
107. Komala 60 y / F + 9M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
108. Kannaki 46 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
109. Sridhar 38 y / M + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNCG
110. Shankar 45 y / M + 2M - - - - + - WTT HO SD AB SO 4A NCG
111. Krishnan 50 y / M + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNCG
112. Papathi 47 y / F + 4M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB IR 4B NCG
113. Alamelu 54 y / F + 8M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NCG
114. Saroja 47 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CdNG
115. Vijaya 38 y / F + 9M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNCG
104
116. Rajeswari 70 y / F + 4M + + + + - + TTW MHO SD MIC ML 5 FTC
117. Harish 28 y / M + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
118. Pachiyammal 50 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB IR 4B NCG
119. Pondiyammal 50 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT IS MX MAC IR 4B CdNCG
120. Banumathi 48 y / F + 1Y - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
121. Shanmugam 39 y / M + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
122. Varunkumar 27 y / M + 9M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B CdNCG
123. Lakshmi 46 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B CG
124. Palaniyappan 51 y / M + 6M - - - - + - WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CdNCG
125. Radha 38 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB IR 4B NG
126. Balasubramani 39 y / M + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
127. Mohanambal 52 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB IR 4B NCG
128. Suseela 48 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
129. Prabavathi 48 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
130. Murugan 38 y / M + 8M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
131. Natarajan 25 y / M + 4M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
132. Veeran 48 y / M + 5M - - - - + - WTT IS SD MAC SO 3 CdNCG
105
133. Sudha 39 y / F + 9M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
134. Baby 47 y / F + 2M - - - - - + WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
135. Revathi 61 y / F + 5M + + - - + - WTT HO SD AB SO 4A FTC
136. Dhanalakshmi 43 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
137. Mayavan 63 y / M + 7M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
138. Latha 52 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
139. Kesavan 46 y / M + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
140. Selvi 31 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
141. Vijayan 52 y / M + 5M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
142. Sarala 50 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
143. Narayanan 48 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
144. Geethalakshmi 42 y / F + 7M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
145. Velusamy 53 y / M + 9M - - - - - + WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CG
146. Vimala 30 y / F + 2M - - - - + - WTT IS MX MAC SO 3 NG
147. Rukmani 51 y / F + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
148. Nadesan 45 y / M + 4M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
149. Saraswathi 37 y / F + 6M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
106
150. Ganesan 46 y / M + 3M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
151. Hemalatha 52 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
152. Annamalai 60 y / M + 3M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
153. Poongothai 54 y / F + 4M - - - - - + WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CdNCG
154. Abdul kareem 48 y / M + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
155. Stephen 52 y / M + 2M - + - + + - WTT HO SD AB SO 4A NG
156. Yasodha 58 y / F + 7M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
157. Narmatha 46 y / F + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
158. Ganga 37 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
159. Manimegalai 40 y/ F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
160. Selvi 38 y / F + 4M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
161. Bhuvana 47 y / F + 8M - - - - + - WTT HO MX AB SO 4A CG
162. Sathish 45 y / M + 3M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
163. Balaji 36 y / M + 6M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 CG
164. Palanivelraja 42 y / M + 3M - - - + - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
165. Muthu 35 y / M + 6M - - - - - + WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
166. Indharani 58 y / F + 3M + + + - - + TTW MHO SD MIC ML 5 PTC
107
167. Vidhya 50 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
168. Sarasawathi 60 y / F + 3M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
169. Gayathri 48 y / F + 5M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NCG
170. Kannammal 50 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
171. Pache 65 y / F + 8M + + - + + - WTT MHO SD AB ML 4B PTC
172. Palaniyappan 52 y / M + 1M - - - + + - WTT HR MX MAC SO 3 NCG
173. Radha 48 y / F + 9M - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
174. Sudhakar 31 y / M + 1M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
175. Kannaki 36 y / F + 1Y - - - - + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
176. Murugan 39 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
177. Lakshmi 51 y / F + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
178. Subramani 48 y / M + 4M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 NCG
179. Kanaga 51 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNG
180. Kannan 47 y / M + 3M - - - - - + WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
181. Moorthy 50 y / M + 9M - - - + - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 CdNCG
182. Kalpana 48 y / F + 2M - - - + + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
183. Ponni 38 y / F + 4M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
108
184. Natarajan 63 y / M + 3M + - - - - + WTT HO SD AB SO 4A FTC
185. Thangavel 47 y / M + 2M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
186. Durairaj 40 y / M + 3M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
187. Mallika 46 y /F + 2M - - - + + - WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
188. Selvi 42 y / F + 2M - - - - - + WTT HR MX MAC SO 3 CdNG
189. Duraisamy 58 y / M + 6M - - - + - + WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
190. Chithra 46 y / F + 7M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
191. Vijayanandh 45 y / M + 9M - - - + + - WTT HO SD AB SO 4A CdNCG
192. Suganya 28 y / F + 5M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
193. Hariharan 30 y / M + 6M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NCG
194. Alamelu 53 y / F + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG
195. Senthilkumar 48 y / M + 3M - - - + + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CG
196. Jothi 39 y / F + 6M - - - + - + WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNG
197. Sheela 50 y / F + 7M - - - + + - WTT IS SD AB SO 3 NG
198. Maheswari 45 y / F + 8M - - - - + - WTT IS MX AB SO 3 NCG
199. Pondi 61 y / M + 2M - - - - - + WTT HR SD AB SO 3 NG
200. Thangammal 35 y / F + 6M - - - - + - WTT HR MX AB SO 3 CdNCG