Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or...

26
Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. PART

Transcript of Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or...

Page 1: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future.

PART

Page 2: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

A Tech Research Asia ReportCommissioned by Telstra

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02

Page 3: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question many global corporations face. ‘Disruption’ is an overused term yet there is no denying global trends of competition and innovation are driving organisations to execute on digital business transformation as well as assess the effectiveness of their technology in supporting their business.

This report summarises the views of 1,040 respondents from multinational companies on a number of issues including:

• The extent digital disruption is impacting on key global and vertical market sectors and how firms are executing on digital transformation strategies.

• The effectiveness of technology and ‘as a service’ consumption models in supporting digital transformation strategies.

• Identification of business and technology priorities and the impact of network performance on a firm’s ability to execute its digital transformation strategy.

Complacency is not an option. Data revealed MNCs are seizing the initiative in today’s digital world and actively seeking to be the disruptors rather than allowing start-ups to emulate the success of companies such as Uber, Bloom Energy or AirBNB.

Intimately coupled with being the disruptor is the push to undertake a digital transformation (i.e. to leverage digital technologies such as cloud, virtual networks, analytics, etc in support of business transformation) to support three key initiatives:

• Improving customer experience

• Streamlining operations

• Moving commodity technology infrastructure to a managed environment

Cloud, Big Data and analytics, security and data storage and management are key to supporting disruption and transformation goals. However there was frustration expressed regarding the efficacy of technology in these programmes: 55% of companies stated their IT organisation did not effectively support such initiatives. Organisations cited a number of issues contributing to this frustration including slow speed of IT to respond, the need for the disintermediation of IT and an inability to competitively differentiate based on homogenous ‘as a service’ technology. Key to future success is the ability to achieve more effective differentiation amongst the three areas of digital transformation strategy and drive greater agility into the performance of telecommunications networks.

Organisations are looking to greater networking, collaboration and flexible service delivery to support competitive differentiation and successful business transformation.

73% – Of firms declared they are threatened by disruption.

60% – Stated they are actively seeking to disrupt current or new markets.

55% – Of MNCs are dissatisfied with their IT’s ability to support disruption and business transformation goals.

87% – Of companies stated their business goals and performance also suffered due to telecommunications network problems.

87%

73% 60%

Introduction & Executive Summary

55%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 03

Page 4: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Introduction & Executive SummaryScope

Telstra commissioned Tech Research Asia (TRA), an independent technology analyst and consulting firm, to create a report that details the global state of the impact of digital disruption, business digital transformation strategies and technology initiatives. The survey data referenced in this report was gathered by Vanson Bourne, an independent specialist in market research.

In total, 1,040 IT decision makers (60% of total) and line of business executives (40% of total) were surveyed in eight countries/regions:

• Australia: 100 respondents

• Hong Kong: 80 respondents

• India: 150 respondents

• Japan: 80 respondents

• Philippines: 80 respondents

• Singapore: 100 respondents

• UK: 150 respondents

• US: 300 respondents

Research participants were required to work for organisations in the private sector with 500 or more employees and have

responsibility for, or at least an awareness of, their organisation’s technology strategy. Companies were also required to have an operating presence in two or more countries.

Vanson Bourne conducted the research in mid 2016 using a mixture of online and telephone interviewing.

The data and results presented in this report are based on the total averages. Where significant variations based on company size, vertical sector or country of headquarters exist, these are also presented.

Aims

In the context of whether technology platforms help companies achieve operational efficiencies at the expense of allowing them to differentiate in the face of digital disruption, the aims of the report are to address three main issues:

• To summarise the extent of digital disruption amongst key global and vertical market sectors and understand how organisations are executing on digital transformation strategies.

• To develop an understanding of the effectiveness of technology solutions and ‘as a service’ consumption models in supporting digital transformation strategies.

• To identify business and technology priorities and assess the impact of network performance on an organisation’s ability to execute on its digital transformation strategy.

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 04

Page 5: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

01 Disruption & Digital Transformation Strategy

Page 6: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

In this section of the report we discuss how disruption is currently influencing executive business and technology agendas. First, what is ‘digital disruption’? In our view it is the impact felt by markets, consumers and organisations when digital technology and business models change consumption and value propositions.

We address a number of issues including:

• The degree to which organisations consider themselves exposed to digital disruption.

• How active are organisations in trying to disrupt competitors and markets?

• Compared with two years ago, the degree to which organisations are more exposed to a competitive market now; and the level they will be more exposed to two years from now.

• Other factors influencing the level of competition in the market.

• The impact of ‘as a service’ technology consumption on the ability of firms to achieve competitive differentiation.

Consider the following:

• 47% of employed workers in the US are at risk of losing their jobs due to automation in the coming two decades.1

• 60% of new jobs in the coming 10 years have not yet been created.2

• Half the companies on the Fortune 500 have disappeared since 2000.

• “Smarter use of digital skills, technologies and other assets could boost productivity and generate US$2 trillion of additional economic output by 2020.”3

These points are a small yet highly significant illustration of the impact that digital disruption is having on multiple countries and markets around the world.

Exposure to disruption

With regards to our survey sample, the hype about disruption matches the reality. The consequences of disruption reverberate globally. Almost three-quarters (73%) of organisations declared that their operations are exposed to disruption. Another 19% of firms believe that whilst they are not currently exposed to it now, they will be in the future. A relatively low 8% stated their organisations are not exposed to any form of disruption now or in the future. (See Chart 1: Is your organisation exposed to disruption?).

1Frey, C. and Osborne, M. 2013, The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?, 17 September, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.

2Thomas Frey, Futurist.

3https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-4/Accenture-Strategy-Digital-Disruption-Growth-Multiplier.pdf (Accessed 28 June, 2016)

19%

8%

20% Very exposed to disruption

Not at all exposed to disruption and will not be in the future

Not at all exposed to disruption, but will be in the future

53%Somewhat exposed to disruption

Chart 1: Is your organisation exposed to disruption?

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

73%Exposed to disruption

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 06

Page 7: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

From a country perspective, Hong Kong firms considered themselves as the most exposed and the Philippines as the least exposed (although firms here expect it to have the greatest impact in the future).

The graphic following (Chart 2: Country prevalence of digital transformation strategy & exposure to disruption) also illustrates that firms in Singapore, the Philippines and India lead their survey peers in the prevalence of digital transformation strategy.

We also mapped vertical markets against two factors – the extent to which each vertical has embarked on developing digital transformation strategies and the level of disruption to which that sector is exposed. (See Chart 3: Vertical market prevalence of digital transformation strategies & exposure to disruption)

Retail and technology sectors exhibited the highest levels of exposure to disruption whilst private education, the oil, gas, energy and utilities group, and private health perceived their sectors as having a lower exposure to disruption than other sectors. Several sectors (private health, telecommunications, professional services and IT) also evidenced relatively high prevalence of transformation strategies.

TelecomsPrivate Health

IT & TechProfessional Services

Banking/Financial Services

Distribution Transport Logistics

Private Education

Oil, Gas, Energy, Utilities

Manufacturing

Retail

Chart 3: Vertical market prevalence of digital transformation strategies & exposure to disruption

Mat

urit

y of

dig

ital

tr

ansf

orm

atio

n st

rate

gy

Exposure to disruption

Hong KongUK

USIndia

SingaporePhilippines

Australia

Japan

Chart 2: Country prevalence of digital transformation strategy & exposure to disruption

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

Mat

urit

y of

dig

ital

tr

ansf

orm

atio

n st

rate

gy

Exposure to disruption

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 07

Page 8: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Do unto others …

It is very clear that disruption is a two-way activity. Many readers will be very familiar with the use of disruptive examples from the likes of Alibaba, Netflix and so forth and the impact these start-up companies have had in attacking established markets. Less explored is to what extent established organisations are focusing on being the disruptors.

The common default assumption is larger, more established industry firms/sectors are under threat from disruption by start-ups. Our data suggests otherwise – 60% of firms stated that they are seeking to disrupt either their current or new markets. (See Chart 4: Is your company actively trying to disrupt by digitising its own business?).

Chart 5 following (Vertical market exposure to disruption and intent to disrupt markets) details the intent to disrupt by vertical market sector.

Telecommunications, IT&T and manufacturing firms claim to be the most active in attempting to disrupt either their current or new markets. Reflecting its exposure to relatively lower levels of disruption than other markets, private education is also the least inclined to take an active approach to disrupting others.

40%

18%

Very actively trying to disrupt others

Not actively trying to disrupt others and we will not in the future

Somewhat actively trying to disrupt others

21%Not actively trying to disrupt others, but we will do in the future

Chart 4: Is your company actively trying to disrupt by digitising its own business?

Telecoms

IT & Tech

Private Health

Professional Services

Banking/Financial Services

Manufacturing

Distribution, Transport, Logistics

Private Education

Oil, Gas, Energy, Utilities

Retail

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

Chart 5: Vertical market exposure to disruption & intent to disrupt markets

Act

ivel

y tr

ying

to

dis

rup

t oth

ers

Exposure to disruption

21%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 08

Page 9: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

The rate of disruption is accelerating

The research data suggests that almost four-in-10 (38%) of firms believe they are more exposed to a competitive market now than two years ago and 56% expect to be even more exposed in the coming 24 months.

Companies in India are the most wary of growth of future competition and disruption, with 75% believing they will be more exposed in the future. Firms in Japan sat at the other end of the spectrum, with 38% expecting an increase over the same period.

From a vertical market perspective, the oil, gas, energy and utilities sector group expects to experience the greatest increase in disruptive competition in the coming two years. The retail sector indicates the lowest future expectation for more competitive pressure (principally reflecting the degree of transformation already experienced for the last 10-15 years as well as competition being perceived as the ‘new normal’). See: Examples of disruptive technology by industry for illustrations of potential changes.

Examples of disruptive technology by industry Source: TRA

EducationBook renter, Self adapting text books

Professional ServicesAutomation, AI, Robot Lawyers

Oil, gas, energy and utilities‘Off-grid’ energy retailers

Retail3D Printing, AR, VR

Private healthHealth Informatics

Financial ServicesBlockchain

TelecommunicationsIoT, OTT

Manufacturing 3D Printing

Distribution, transportDriverless vehicles

IT & TechnologyQuantum

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 09

Page 10: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Our existing competitors are more competitive 58%

Factors influencing the level of market competition

The original theory of disruption is, in part, predicated on emerging or start-up organisations leveraging technology to change market consumption dynamics. However, echoing the data previously discussed, when asked why their organisations are more exposed to competition, the primary response was existing competitors increasing their own level of competitive capability. (See Chart 6: Top 5 reasons for increased competitive exposure).

The top three factors can be broadly categorised as external competition, as follows:

1. Increased competitor activity

2. Start-ups and new entrants

3. Partners/customers becoming competitors

However the remaining two factors in the top five are definitely internal and reflect the importance of having an effective technology environment:

4. Technology platforms (networks, data, collaboration tools) do not allow firms to innovate as quickly as competitors

5. Technology platforms (networks, data, collaboration tools) are too rigid and do not allow for flexible allocation of resources to new projects.

In our view, overcoming this rigidity has been one of the drivers for organisations moving to more cloud-infrastructure solutions and adoption of ‘as a service’ consumption models.

Chart 6: Top 5 reasons for increased competitive exposure

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Our technology platforms (networks, data, collaboration tools) do not allow us to quickly reassign resources to new projects

20%

Our technology platforms (networks, data, collaboration tools) do not allow us to innovate as quickly as others

38%

Partners and customers are becoming our competitors 44%

Start-ups and new entrants are having an impact on our market 45%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 10

Page 11: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

The adoption of ‘as a service’ consumption

The benefits of cloud and ‘as a service’ consumption have been well documented. Less so has been the issue of ‘as a service’ on competitive differentiation.

As can be seen in Chart 7 (What proportion of your tech spend is ‘as a service’ consumption?) our respondents told us that, on average, currently 42% of their technology spend is comprised of ‘as a service’ consumption and this will grow to 49% within 12 months.

Whilst there is no denying that this approach has allowed firms to achieve cost efficiencies and optimise IT utilisation through cloud infrastructure and software consumption, one of the trade-offs appears to be reduced customisation of technology platforms. As the early mover gains of flexibility and scalability become eroded by more companies adopting similar technology infrastructure and services, there is a need for companies to seek competitive differentiation elsewhere.

The survey data clearly reveals that for the 71% of firms, their infrastructure becomes

commodity-based as they move towards ‘as a service’ consumption. By its nature, commodity infrastructure is difficult to customise – yet in this environment of disruption and digital transformation, customisation can be a key aspect of differentiation.

Almost two-thirds (63%) felt their organisations were struggling to competitively differentiate themselves as a result of this commoditisation.

To combat this, 69% of companies believe they need to adopt a two-part approach that:

1. Assigns commodity infrastructure to third party organisations to manage, and

2. Focuses internal company resources on growth and transformation projects

This raises an interesting issue of how technology is best used to support business transformation programmes. With this in mind, let’s examine how firms are transforming their digital transformation technology strategies.

As the early mover gains of flexibility and scalability become eroded by more companies adopting similar technology infrastructure and services, there is a need for companies to seek competitive differentiation elsewhere.

Currently In 12 Months Chart 7: What proportion of your tech spend is ‘as a service’ consumption?

UK

35% 43%

HK

37% 43%

INDIA

49% 62%

JPN

33% 35%

PH

57% 67%

SG

37% 46%

AUS

39% 47%

US

44% 48%

Average

42% 49%

Disruption & DigitalTransformation Strategy

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 11

Page 12: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

02 The Digital Transformation Agenda

Page 13: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

The Digital Transformation Agenda

This section of the report addresses two key questions:

• Do organisations have a formal digital transformation strategy and, if so, what role is responsible for overseeing it?

• What are the business priorities of companies’ digital transformation programmes?

It’s obvious that digital transformation is a key priority for businesses. 97% of organisations have, or plan to have, a formal strategy and only 3% indicated that they don’t know or neither have, nor intend to initiate, a digital transformation

strategy. Reflecting the critical nature of technology, 32% of firms stated that their CIO is responsible for leading their programmes. After the CIO, responsibility is held by:

• CEO: 24%

• CDO: 14%

• CFO: 9%

• Shared CXO: 7%

Chart 8 (Business priorities of digital transformation) provides detail on the top 10 most likely business goals.

The top three business transformation goals encompass:

• Improving customer experience – through digital including engagement, satisfaction, multi-channel approaches and lifetime value.

• Streamlining operations – encompassing business process and technology optimisation.

• Moving commodity technology infrastructure to a managed environment – to allow IT to concentrate on business growth and innovation.

Chart 8: Business priorities of digital transformation

Improving customer experience

Streamlining operations

Move to Managed Services. IT focus on innovation

Driving down costs

Accelerating time to market

Future workspace for collaboration

Accelerating time to insight

Deploying new solutions to the business

Ensuring engagement not restricted by IT

Attract and retain employees

41%

30%35%

18%15%

25%

37%

28%32%

39%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 13

Page 14: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

03 The Role Of Technology In Digital Transformation

Page 15: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Organisations told us they are less than totally satisfied with the effectiveness of their technology when it comes to supporting transformation efforts.

In fact 55% of companies expressed frustration with their current technology platform; namely:

• IT does not move quickly enough to support the business: 29%

• It is easier to circumvent IT and do it ourselves: 20%

• IT does not support goals at all; it is a hindrance to the business: 6%

Chart 9 details the effectiveness (or otherwise) of IT infrastructure in supporting business goals.

Of the vertical markets, distribution, transport and logistics expressed the highest degree of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of their IT environments, followed by telecommunications, retail and manufacturing. Education, telecommunications, healthcare and professional services all cited above-average scores for the positive alignment of IT totally supporting business goals.

More than one in two of our respondents cited issues with their current technology

infrastructure supporting their business goals, suggesting current technology infrastructure has not been fully optimised to support the business.

So where do businesses see technology as critical to their digital transformation moving forward? Read on to find out.

Chart 9: Is your IT organisation effective in supporting business transformation goals?

IT

29%IT supports but does not move quickly enough

27%IT mostly supports

20%IT is limited. It is easier to circumvent and DIY

6%

18%IT totally supports & reflects true IT and business alignment

IT hinders us

The Role Of Technology In Digital Transformation

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 15

Page 16: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

What technologies are companies deploying to support their digital transformation?

Cloud infrastructure (private, hybrid and public) dominates the investment priorities for the coming year (as seen in Chart 10). Our view is this reflects the advantages of cloud, including scalability, quicker speed to market, utilisation efficiencies and an OPEX-driven cost model.

Private cloud, the top ranked priority, brings multiple benefits – key of which are clarity around data location (to address

data sovereignty concerns), enhanced security and more direct management of the cloud environment compared to a public cloud infrastructure.

Big Data and analytics (second overall priority) links tightly to the desire to both improve and streamline operating efficiencies as well as deepen and improve engagement with customers.

Beyond the traditional ‘table stakes’ aspect, security (third overall priority) features for several key factors including the increase in targeted, criminal and State-sponsored attacks, the emergence

of Internet of Things (IoT) technology and the growing complexity of governance, risk and compliance (GRC) requirements. Data storage and management (fourth) and hybrid cloud (fifth) rounded out the top five.

An analysis of top five technology priorities by vertical market did not show much variation across sectors; the only exception being the inclusion of enterprise mobility for the oil, gas, energy and utilities group and the distribution, logistics and transportation sector who reported unified communications and collaboration.

Chart 10: To support digital transformation, what are your priorities in the coming 12 months

40% – Security 39% – Data storage and management

24% – Apps/SW Development

14% – Machine learning

22% – Data centre transformation

22% – SDN/NFV

40% – Big Data and Analytics

25% – Public cloud

46% – Private cloud

14% – ERP/Supply chain

25% – Enterprise mobility

10% – Adopting DevOps

35% – Hybrid cloud

18% – UC&C 11% – Learning platforms

The Role Of Technology In Digital Transformation

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 16

Page 17: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

“New technology such as IoT or SDN are part of disruptive digital ecosystems we’re racing towards. IoT, for example, is fundamentally exciting yet embryonic. We’re on the cusp of major revolution in that space.” Sundi Balu Director–Global Business to Business IT, Telstra

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 17

Page 18: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Future workplace

One area intertwined with a number of digital transformation goals is the adoption of what TRA terms the ‘Future Workplace’. (i.e. the transformation of a traditional workplace environment to incorporate new technologies, real estate, and architectural and cultural aspects to drive cost efficiencies, innovation, collaboration and employee engagement).

Globally we are seeing greater adoption of future workplace approaches typically enabled by a combination of enterprise mobility and cloud-delivered data and applications. Amongst our respondents 96% of organisations have a formal workplace strategy programme, typically led by the CIO or IT Director.

As part of their future workplace strategies, 62% of firms see mobile/remote working from home (or while travelling) as a work style that their organisation will support over the next 12 months; and almost half (47%) will support activity-based working (ABW).

Firms are looking to future workplace strategies for a multitude of reasons; however the top three initiatives are:

• To drive innovation and fresh thinking

• To enable productivity through flexibility

• To create flexibility that helps adapt to changing business conditions

There was little significant variation in these factors when analysed by industry sector except for Retail (looking to improve talent recruitment and retention factors) and IT (seeking to harness emerging technology more effectively).

In 2014, TRA conducted research amongst organisations that had adopted a future workspace strategy. Of the top three benefits experienced by firms, number one was improved internal collaboration and number three was better client engagement (number two was to be a showcase for the organisation). Both of these represent key aspects of our respondents’ business transformation goals and strategies.

From a technology perspective, there are five key solutions integral to a successful future workplace deployment:

• Wi-Fi + cellular networks

• IP Telephony

• UC&C cloud collaboration tools

• Mobile ‘friendly’ devices – 2-in-1s (such as Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro), tablets, laptops, smartphones

• Data management solutions

Workplace strategy and transformation is an extremely complex initiative for large organisations and it was not surprising to see that only 4% of firms would keep the initiative in-house with no external support. 60% of firms indicated they would look to telecommunications or IT service providers to provide consulting support around technology environments. Interestingly, architecture and workplace design companies made the top five list of external consultancies in fifth spot – suggesting firms are open to non-technology driven approaches.

However, 76% of organisations stated that their workplace strategy effectiveness could be more dynamic if their technology and network platforms were more flexible and agile. Critically too, 67% of firms indicated their ability to work more collaboratively and effectively is hindered by rigid technology and network platforms.

The Role Of Technology In Digital Transformation

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 18

Page 19: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

04 Dynamic Network Infrastructure And Its Importance To Digital Transformation

Page 20: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

A company’s network remains a critical pillar of ‘business as usual’ operations as well digital transformation. It’s clear from the research data that if an organisation’s network underperforms and lacks flexibility then it jeopardises multiple areas of operation.

87% of respondents told us that their business had suffered as a result of network problems and, on average, experienced 11 issues per year. (See Chart 11: How frequently does your business suffer due to poor telecoms network connectivity?).

Firms in Singapore experienced the lowest number of significant problems, averaging seven per year; whilst India and Hong Kong tied for the highest at 15 issues per year apiece (with the US at 13).

Sector-wise, retail experienced the highest number of problems (17 per year), followed by telecommunications (14 per year) and IT & technology (13 per year). Reflecting the stringent performance demands of their sectors, BFSI and oil, gas, energy and utilities experienced the lowest number of issues (nine per year).

Chart 11: How frequently does your business suffer due to poor telecoms network connectivity?

Never

Less than once a year

At least once per year

At least once per quarter

At least once per month

At least once per week

Dynamic Network Infrastructure And Its Importance To Digital Transformation

5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

10%

16%

14%

23%

23%

12%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 20

Page 21: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Poor network performance adversely impacts companies’ ability to undertake or defend against disruptive activity as well as executing on key areas of digital transformation strategies including:

• Customer engagement,

• Streamlining operational performance, and

• Future Workplace to drive collaboration and innovation.

Given these issues with network connectivity, we were not surprised to see software defined networking (SDN) falls within the top 10 technology investment priorities: One common frustration with network performance is its lack of flexibility. For many organisations, it is a tedious, complicated and expensive process to create truly flexible multi-country network operations.

SDN has the potential to bring multiple benefits to businesses including:

• Dynamic provisioning of infrastructure services.

• Improved support for, and quicker test/dev/deploy of, custom applications (a key aspect in helping companies reclaim some of the lost customisation due to ‘as a service’ models).

• Ability to test new projects and growth markets while limiting exposure to capital outlay.

• Improved security stance.

• Ability to rapidly scale to support Big Data and mobile traffic.

• Enhanced management of hybrid cloud environments for different workloads including network bandwidth, storage and computer resources.

From a business perspective, our respondents saw tremendous benefits to be gained through a more dynamic network environment. 75% of firms noted that more dynamic networks would enable them to more successfully pursue their digital transformation strategies, and almost three-quarters (74%) felt it would strengthen their competitive position, support growth initiatives and create stronger customer engagement programmes.

The critical importance of dynamic networks can be seen in the 10 benefits identified by our survey respondents. Spanning strategy, execution, customer engagement and future workplace initiatives, the list is as follows:

Dynamic Network Infrastructure And Its Importance To Digital Transformation

10 BENEFITS OF DYNAMIC NETWORKS

01. More successfully pursue digital transformation strategy

02. More quickly and efficiently support company growth initiatives

03. Strengthen competitive position

04. More successfully pursue customer engagement strategies

05. Better pursue a future/flexible workplace strategy

06. Better respond to disruptive competitors

07. Launch new products/ services faster

08. Improve the return on investment from cloud technology

09. Remove one of the blockages to being a more agile organisation

10.Be more disruptive in the marketplace

75% – Of firms noted that more dynamic networks would enable them to more successfully pursue their digital transformation strategies.

75%

74% – Felt more dynamic networks would strengthen their competitive position, support growth initiatives and create stronger customer engagement programmes.

74%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 21

Page 22: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

“The industry and our customers need to respond to market dynamics much more quickly and SDN is becoming one of the key tools of the trade. For example we’re looking at SD-WAN solutions with cloud interconnects to deliver outcomes for customers in weeks rather than the nine to 12 months it used to take. Things will only continue to improve for our customers too … I can visualise a day in the future where we will be able to manipulate wavelengths at the fibre-optic level through software, to be even more flexible with services.” Sundi Balu Director–Global Business to Business IT, Telstra

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 22

Page 23: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

In Closing

If, as our respondents have indicated, the majority decision amongst MNCs is to confront disruptive forces head-on with their own disruption plays, companies need to give deep consideration to creating stronger competitive differentiation and agile networks through their technology infrastructure.

Our data suggests that the adoption of cloud-based ‘as a service’ technology consumption has brought benefits (in terms of scalable infrastructure, changing pricing models and optimised utilisation, etc); however as more organisations adopt similar solutions the ability to achieve flexible, competitive digital strategy differentiation decreases.

The majority of respondents clearly indicated that their IT organisation does not effectively support either disruption or digital transformation activities. Not only that, in a double whammy, organisations also stated that current telecommunications network performance was adversely impacting their ability to pursue both disruption and digital transformation strategies.

In many instances networks lacked the flexibility and agility to quickly respond to business requirements. Our data revealed a significant top 10 list of ‘we could do better if we had more agile networks’ issues ranging across customers, internal operations, collaboration, go-to-market engagement and competitive activity.

We trust you have found this report interesting and it provided an opportunity to reflect upon disruption and digital transformation within your own organisation. In that context, we leave you with a number of issues to consider:

• Does your organisation have clearly articulated, C-suite driven, disruption and digital transformation strategies? If not, why not? Attempting successful execution will be nigh-impossible without C-suite support.

• How do your customer experience and (Big) Data analytics initiatives meld together? Customer engagement is driven by understanding the customer environment … and unless you can quickly access (in near real-time) data and analysis in an agile manner, delivering it to where it is most needed, then digital transformation will struggle.

• Do not forget security – particularly in a cloud-centric environment it is critical to assess your technology provider’s security and governance, risk and compliance (GRC) credentials. Security and GRC should be focused on supporting innovation and disruption, not suffocating them.

• How can your organisation achieve greater flexibility with its network environment? Does your organisation need a more dynamic network environment that responds to business demands?

• Is your organisation at risk from the commoditisation of ‘as a service’ technology consumption? Will it be in future as more competitors adopt similar

solutions? If so, what steps can be taken to introduce greater flexibility and agility into the technology environment?

• If considering SDN (software defined networking), does your provider operate its own network or provide SDN services through an overlay approach on another vendor? Is their approach an open environment or one that relies on proprietary integration? Can networks (local and international), applications, configuration and pricing/bandwidth information be accessed through a single management portal?

• What is your organisation’s approach to fostering a future workspace environment? Is your culture and executive management appropriate for such an approach? Connectivity and collaboration tools are critical components to a successful deployment – how have these been incorporated into your organisation and do they support an ‘anywhere/place/time’ operation?

• Have you conducted a thorough evaluation of the contribution your existing workplace strategy makes to organisational goals and how potential changes could generate new and/or more value? Could these changes allow you to achieve optimal engagement with clients? Improve risk management? Drive greater collaboration and innovation?

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 23

Page 24: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Survey Demographics

Vanson Bourne conducted the research in mid-2016 using a mixture of online and telephone interviewing.

Respondents were required to hold an IT or line of business decision-maker role and come from organisations that operate in two or more countries. Organisations of less than 500 employees were excluded from survey results.

Details by number of company size (by number of employees), industry sector and geographic spread (by operations in number of countries, country of response) are illustrated below.

The total number of survey respondents was 1,040.

In how many countries does your organisation operate?

Demographic split by country of responseDemographic split by number of employees

Demographics by sector

2-3 countries

4-5 countries

6-10 countries

11-20 countries

More than 20 countries

27%

23%

17%

13%

20%

%

10% Australia

8% Hong Kong

14% India

8% Japan

8% Philippines

10% Singapore

14%UK

29%US

23%

3,001–5,000 employees

25%

22%

1,001–3,000 employees

501–1,000 employees

30%

More than 5,000 employees

Other private sector

Private education

Oil, gas, energy, utilities

Private healthcare

Telecommunications Distribution, logistics

Professional services

ManufacturingRetail Financial services IT and technology

3%4% 4% 5% 5% 6% 9% 9% 15% 20% 22%

30%20%10%

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 24

Page 25: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

About Telstra

About Tech Research Asia

Telstra is one of the leading telecommunications and technology companies offering a wide range of services globally. We bring innovative technology, capability and talent from around the world to enable our customers to thrive in a connected world. Telstra’s heritage is proudly Australian, but we have a longstanding international business with a focus on the Asia-Pacific region.

Today, we have over 3,500 employees based in 20 countries outside of Australia providing services to thousands of business and government customers.

Our customers are global, our people are local and our assets are anchored in Asia. Over several decades we have established one of the largest subsea cable networks in Asia-Pacific, with a unique and diverse set of infrastructure that offers access to the most intra-Asia lit capacity and largest subsea cable system in Asia Pacific.

The network plays a crucial role underpinning the digital economy in Asia-Pacific, meeting the needs of wholesale and enterprise customers around the world. We also provide sophisticated network application services and have growing interests in software, video delivery, e-commerce and health.

Growing our business globally is a strategic priority for Telstra, and we are focused on being the leading service provider for our customers across Asia-Pacific. We are also seeking to leverage our capabilities and assets to capture connectivity opportunities in industries where technology is creating competitive disruption.

www.telstraglobal.com

Tech Research Asia is an Asian-based technology consulting and analyst firm. Established in 2012 it provides independent research, consulting, advisory, content, and engagement for technology buyers and suppliers in Asia Pacific. In addition to undertaking our own independent research on technology and business trends, TRA offers a wide range of services to executive technology buyers and suppliers in all Asia Pacific markets. To learn more, visit: www.techresearch.asia

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 25

Page 26: Disrupted or Disrupting? - Panviva...Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 02 Disrupt or be disrupted? At the risk of vaguely channelling Shakespeare that is the question

Copyright and quotation policy The Tech Research Asia (TRA) name and published materials are subject to trademark and copyright protection, regardless of source. Use of this research and content for an organisation’s internal purposes is acceptable given appropriate attribution to Tech Research Asia. For further information on acquiring rights to use Tech Research Asia research and content please contact us via our website -- http://techresearch.asia/ contact -- or directly.

Disclaimer You accept all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this research document and any information or material available from it. To the maximum permitted by law, Tech Research Asia excludes all liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from using this research and content and any information or material available from it. This report is provided for information purposes only. It is not a complete analysis of every material fact respecting any technology, company, industry, security or investment. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Statements of fact have been obtained from sources considered reliable but no representation is made by Tech Research Asia or any of its affiliates as to their completeness or accuracy.

Disrupted or Disrupting? Fast track your future. 26