July 19, 2012: Market Outlook and Strategy Update for CPGs and Entrepreneurs
Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of...
Transcript of Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of...
![Page 1: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Disparities in the development and implementation ofguidelines for the management of depression in adults
A systematic review of evidence from high- vs. low- and middle-income countries
Yena Leeon behalf of the GACD Mental Health Guidelines Working Group:
Elisa Brietzke, Bing Cao, Yan Chen, Outi Linnaranta, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Paulina Cortes, Markus Kosters, Amna Majeed,Jocelyn K. Tamura, Leanna M. W. Lui, Maj Vinberg, Jaakko Keinanen, Steve Kisely, Sadiq Naveed, Corrado Barbui,
Mayowa Owolabi, Daisuke Nishi, JungGoo Lee, Manit Srisurapanont, Hartej Gill, Lan Guo, Vicent Balanza-Martınez, TimoPartonen, Willem A. Nolen, Jae-Hon Lee, Ji Hwan Kim, Niels H. Chavannes, Tatjana Ewais, Beatriz Atienza-Carbonell,Anna V. Silven, Naonori Yasuma, Andrey Novikov, Artyom Gil, Cameron Lacey, Anke Versluis, Sofia von Malortie, Lai
Fong Chan, Ahmed Waqas, Marianna Purgato, Jiska Aardoom, Josefina T. Ly-Uson, Kang Sim, Maria Tuineag, Riannevan der Kleij, Sanne van Luenen, Sirijit Suttajit, Tomas Hajek, Yu Wei Lee, Gary Parker, Richard J. Porter, Mohammad
Alsuwaidan, Roger S. McIntyre
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto;Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital,
University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 1 / 10
![Page 2: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
About the Working Group (Nov. 2018 – Present)
>50 collaborators in 30 countries (>25 languages)
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 2 / 10
![Page 3: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project Objectives
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to support clinical decision making,standardize care, improve health outcomes, and reduce cost.
To characterize the development and implementation of
CPGs for the management of depressionin adults with major depressive or bipolar disorder.
To compare CPGs from high- and low/middle-income countries onmeasures of:
Guideline availabilityDevelopment process qualityTranslatabilityImplementabilityApplication monitoring
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019124759Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 3 / 10
![Page 4: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Availability of CPGs for Depression
94 national and international CPGs in 26 languages from 82 countries
Many LMICs, especially in Africa, lack CPGs
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 4 / 10
![Page 5: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Target Populations and Users
51 MDD, 33 BD
Most CPGs target psychiatrists (81%) or primary care providers (68%)
Fewer CPGs target policymakers (20%) or payers (14%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychiatrists
PrimaryCare
Providers
OtherSpecialists
Psychologists
Nurses
Patients
PolicyMakers
Payers
0 20 40 60
# of Guidelines
Income Classification
HIC
UMIC
LM/LIC
International
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 5 / 10
![Page 6: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Guideline Scope and Intent
15 CPGs provide work-related decision support: continue workingunless otherwise indicated, measure impairment, consult resources
50 CPGs recommend and 6 recommend against depression screening
CardiometabolicComorbidities
PsychiatricComorbidities
Screening
PrimaryPrevention
Work−relatedDecisionSupport
0 25 50 75 100
% of Guidelines
Income Classification
HIC
UMIC
LM/LIC
International
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 6 / 10
![Page 7: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Quality of Guideline Development Processes
26% of CPGs for depression developed by multidisciplinary group
vs 64% in diabetes mellitus, 52% in hypertension (Owolabi et al., 2016; 2018)
54% openly declared funding sources and COIs
0
2
4
6
8
40 60 80
Healthcare Access and Quality Index [Median]
# o
f Io
M S
tandard
s M
et [M
edia
n]
Income Classification HIC UMIC LM/LIC
Transparency*, 60%
COI Management*, 62%
Multidisciplinary* DG, 38%
Systematic Review*, 71%
Grading Strength*, 47%
Clarity, 76%
External Review*, 50%Updating, 48%
27%27%
9%
41%
23%
59%
23%
36%33%33%
0%0%0%
33%
0%0%
HICsHICsHICsHICsHICsHICsHICsHICs UMICsUMICsUMICsUMICsUMICsUMICsUMICsUMICs LM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICsLM/LICs
0
20
40
60
80
% o
f G
uid
elin
es
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 7 / 10
![Page 8: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Guideline Translatability and Implementability
66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention efficacyonly 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation22% evaluated patient preferences
35% operationalized criteria for monitoring CPG application
16% plan to assess CPG adherence and/or quality indicators
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
−−
−
−
0
20
40
60
AuthorCredibility
Implem−entation
Tool
Ethical SocialLegal EconomicEaseof
Use
ResourceImplications
PatientPref−
erences
Enablers&
Barriers
Effect−iveness
Surv−eillance
# o
f G
uid
elin
es
HIC
UMIC
LM/LIC
International
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 8 / 10
![Page 9: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Conclusions
Globally, the implementation of CPGs is inadequately planned,reported, and measured.
To what extent CPGs are acceptable to patients and target users,feasible, and cost-effective and improve health outcomes remainsunknown.
Refinement of decision support processes in depression is a criticalfirst step towards the aim of reducing morbidity, especially in low- andmiddle-income countries.
Future guidelines should present strategies to implementrecommendations and measure feasibility, cost-effectiveness, andimpact on health outcomes, co-designed by stakeholders andexperiential knowledge experts from low- and middle-income
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 9 / 10
![Page 10: Disparities in the development and implementation of ...66% of CPGs informed by systematic review of intervention e cacy only 26% evaluated enablers and barriers to CPG implementation](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050216/5f625b092c2c5c677a5ab367/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Acknowledgements
GACD Mental Health Guidelines Working Group: Elisa Brietzke, Bing Cao,Yan Chen, Outi Linnaranta, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Paulina Cortes, MarkusKosters, Amna Majeed, Jocelyn K. Tamura, Leanna M. W. Lui, MajVinberg, Jaakko Keinanen, Steve Kisely, Sadiq Naveed, Corrado Barbui,Mayowa Owolabi, Daisuke Nishi, JungGoo Lee, Manit Srisurapanont,Hartej Gill, Lan Guo, Vicent Balanza-Martınez, Timo Partonen, Willem A.Nolen, Jae-Hon Lee, Ji Hwan Kim, Niels H. Chavannes, Tatjana Ewais,Beatriz Atienza-Carbonell, Anna V. Silven, Naonori Yasuma, AndreyNovikov, Artyom Gil, Cameron Lacey, Anke Versluis, Sofia von Malortie,Lai Fong Chan, Ahmed Waqas, Marianna Purgato, Jiska Aardoom,Josefina T. Ly-Uson, Kang Sim, Maria Tuineag, Rianne van der Kleij,Sanne van Luenen, Sirijit Suttajit, Tomas Hajek, Yu Wei Lee, Gary Parker,Richard J. Porter, Mohammad Alsuwaidan, Roger S. McIntyre
Yena Lee Mental Health Guidelines Working Group GACD Annual Meeting 10 / 10