Disobedience Technology

20
Disobedience technology Mathias Klang @klang67

description

 

Transcript of Disobedience Technology

Page 1: Disobedience Technology

Disobedience technologyMathias Klang @klang67

Page 2: Disobedience Technology
Page 3: Disobedience Technology

Thoreau

“Resistance to Civil Government” (1849)We are sometimes obliged to defy the government

Page 4: Disobedience Technology

Gandhi

Duty to disobey the unjust leader.

Difference between civil disobedience & lawlessness

Page 5: Disobedience Technology

Martin Luther King

Letter from Birmingham JailDirect action to initiate negotiationUnjust law is against God’s law

Page 6: Disobedience Technology

M. L. King, Letter from Birmingham Jail (1963)

“For years now I have heard the word ‘Wait!’…We must come to see…that ‘justice too long delayed is justice denied.’…One may well ask, ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’ The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust...One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

Page 7: Disobedience Technology

Rawles: Theory of Justice (1971)

I shall assume, as requiring no argument, that there is, at least in a society such as ours, a moral obligation to obey the law, although it may, of course, be overridden in certain cases by other more stringent obligations. …a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to the law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government.

Page 8: Disobedience Technology

H. A. Bedau: Civil Disobedience in Focus

“committed openly…non-violently…and conscientiously…within the framework of the rule of law…with the intention of frustrating or protesting some law, policy or decision…of the government.”

Page 9: Disobedience Technology

Peter Singer: Civil disobedience

...if the aim of disobedience is to present a case to the public, then only such disobedience as is necessary to present this case is justified...if disobedience for publicity purposes is to be compatible with fair compromise, it must be non-violent.

Page 10: Disobedience Technology

Critique

Not defensible in a democracyDemocratic processHave ALL other methods been exhausted?Obeying social contract

Page 11: Disobedience Technology

Disobedience criteria

1. Disobedience Purpose of civil protest for change2. Civil Public, open, acceptance of consequences3. Non-violent respect people & property4. Legitimacy Conflict of laws or morals

Page 12: Disobedience Technology

No pavements online

Page 13: Disobedience Technology
Page 14: Disobedience Technology

The sit-in

Page 15: Disobedience Technology

Going virtual

1998 DoS attack againt Mexico’s presidents web8,000 hacktivists blocked the site in support of the Zapatistas

Page 16: Disobedience Technology

Technology is all about automating tedious tasks

Page 17: Disobedience Technology

What about using malware?

Page 18: Disobedience Technology

Is this slacktivism or activism?

Page 19: Disobedience Technology

THANKS!

Page 20: Disobedience Technology

Mathias Klang [email protected] or @klang67

www.digital-rights.net

Image & licensing info in the notes section of slides.

Images at www.flickr.com (or specifically stated).

This ppt licensed: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA

Download presentation www.slideshare.net/klang