Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

14
Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest

Transcript of Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

Page 1: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

Discussion groupGrowth strategy

Outcomes

+Proposal

Presidents’ MeetingBucharest

Page 2: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Outcomes

• Question 1: worldwide organisation?• Conquering the world: no• Slowly extending to North-Africa: maybe

• Question 2: more international partners?• Slowly increase the amount• Get to know each other very well before• Clear purpose for cooperation

Page 3: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Outcomes

• Question 3: Should BEST be more pro-active towards target countries?

• Cities without a bonding group• No problem to promote• Long list of possible ways to create

awareness

• Cities with a bonding group• More discussions with bonding are

needed

Page 4: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Situation

• CO.R.E• “BEST should not be pro-active in

approaching universities”22-G-CP-STG-017

• Situation• Not clear what is allowed and what not• Today: pro-active towards cities and

countries where there is a BEST group• You want it!

Page 5: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Proposal

• In the last

Page 6: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Question 1

In 10 years, should BEST consider to be a worldwide

organisation?

Page 7: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Worldwide organisations?

• Partner with CFES• International Engineering Competition• Joint Event on Education • Exchange of participants

• Contact with other organisations in the past• Australia• New Zeeland• India• …

Page 8: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Question 2

Would BEST benefit from having more partners in other

continents?

Page 9: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Growth of BEST: history

# C ountries

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

# C ountries

Page 10: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Growth of BEST: history

• Statistics since 2000• On average:

• 3.5 new LBGs per year• 1.1 new countries per year

•The future:• 48 countries in Europe18 years to cover Europe• 195 countries in the world165 years to cover the world

Page 11: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Countries without BEST• In order of amount of inhabitants

• Germany (82,369,548 ppl )• United Kingdom (60,441,000 ppl)• Belarus (9,799,000 ppl) • Switzerland (7,489,000 ppl)• Bosnia & Herzegovina (4,590,310 ppl)• Ireland (4,016,000 ppl)• Albania (3,619,778 ppl)

• Azerbaijan (8,177,717 – considered case by case)• Georgia (4,677,000 - considered case by case)• Armenia (2,968,586 - considered case by case)

Page 12: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» C.O.RE.

• “Groups from countries where BEST is not present yet should have priority”

22-G-CP-STG-017

•“BEST should not be pro-active in approaching universities”

22-G-CP-STG-017

Page 13: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Question 3

Should BEST be more pro-active towards growth in target

countries?

Page 14: Discussion group Growth strategy Outcomes + Proposal Presidents’ Meeting Bucharest.

» Thank you for your attention

Questions?