Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets...

19
Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido, 050-8585, Japan [email protected]

Transcript of Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets...

Page 1: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis

for Proximity Microseismic Doublets

Koji NaganoMuroran Institute of Technology

Muroran, Hokkaido, 050-8585, [email protected]

Page 2: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

2

What we want to know

Fine structuresFlow pathsin geothermal reservoir

Cloud

Soultz in France

Geothermal fracture reservoir

Page 3: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

3

Proximity microseismic doublets

• Similar waveforms• Interval between events is short, <1s.

Page 4: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

4

Accurate location in proximity MS doublets

microseismic doublets with long interval

long interval

different velocity model

proximity microseismic doublets

More precise than doublets with long interval

1st event 2nd event

Page 5: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

5

Relative location

P-wave interval

Relative location

Fine structureof fracture reservoir

The relative location estimated based on the interval is much precise than that calculated from the each sources.

Page 6: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

6

Cepstrum analysis for proximity MS doublets

• Cepstrum analysis is used to detect interval

Page 7: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

7

Cepstrum

)()()( Ttrxtxty

)]2exp(1)[()( fTjrfXfY

2 2 2( ) ( ) 1 2 cos 2Y f X f r r fT

fTrrfXfY 2cos21log)(log)(log 222

fTrrFfXFqC 2cos21loglog)( 2121

T

Interval

Page 8: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

8

Two cepstrum peaks

• Which is the P-wave interval in the two cepstrum peaks ?

P

S

P ? S ?

Page 9: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

9

Time-quefrency analysis

- Window function suppresses data after the onset of the 2nd S-wave.- I shorten the window function. - When the window function suppresses the 2nd S-wave, S-waves lose similarity and the S-wave peak decreases.

cep

stru

m

quefrency

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

- Cepstrum-quefrency graph is used to detect the interval.

cep

stru

m

Page 10: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

10

Contour plot and cepstrum graph

Contour plot: To discriminate the P-wave peak from the S-wave peakidentification of the cepstrum peaks - continuity of the peak, - comparison of the peak width - exclusion of artifacts

- low resolution in quefrency

Cepstrum graph: - precise detection of quefrency

- difficult discrimination from artifacts

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

cep

stru

m

quefrency

Page 11: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

11

4 check points in contour plotP-wave interval peak

(1) starts more early.The window function suppresses the 2nd S-wave.The 1st and 2nd P-waves are isolated.

(2) is more stable.The S-wave peak decreases because the S-wave loses similarity

(3) is lower.The P-wave is smaller than the S-wave

(4) is narrower.

P

S

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

cep

stru

m

Page 12: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

12

Soultz geothermal field

15089 MS events were located during hydraulic injection in 1993.

The data were monitored at 4 stations

Data length was 1.6 s.Sampling frequency was 5000 Hz.

Proximity MS doublets were 230

Page 13: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

13

Typical result of the time-quefrency analysis

Early startStable, low, and narrow peak

Some artifacts are visible

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

cep

stru

m

quefrency

Page 14: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

14

9 events show P-wave interval peak

The P-wave interval should be detected at 4 stations to determine relative location.

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

que

fre

ncy

Terminal of window

Page 15: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

15

Relative locationThe P-wave intervals in the Proximity MS doublets are compared among the 4 stations.

Moriya 2003 showed 4752 relative locations of MS doublets with long interval.We will examine my relative locations and his data.

Page 16: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

16

Conclusions• Proximity MS doublets are a good tool to estimate fine

structures of a geothermal reservoir.• Time-quefrency analysis can provide the P-wave interval

between the proximity MS doublets.• 4 check points are indicated to discriminate the P-wave

interval in a contour plot of the time-quefrency analysis.• I have estimated relative locations of 9 events recorded

in Soultz geothermal field.

Page 17: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

18

Cepstrum and auto-correlation

Page 18: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

19

Rotation of coordinates

3 component seismic detector was used.3D particle motion associated with seismic waves was measured.

Data in the direction of the P-wave polarization is analyzed in the time-quefrency analysis.

The data is larger than that in the other directions

We have clear P-wave peak in the contour plot when the data in the direction of the P-wave polarization is analyzed in the time-quefrency analysis.

Page 19: Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,

20

A result of the rotation

X-Y-Z P-S1-S2

S1: the maximum variance on S-wave planeS2: P and S1 are perpendicular

P-wave polarization is estimated in the data at the onset of the P-wave