Disaster Resilient Megacities

29
STRATEGIES FOR BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT DURING 2013

description

A megacity means more people (including more homeless and more refugees), more city lifelines, and more buildings (including homes and business enterprizes) that are at risk from the potential disaster agents of each natural hazard. Presentation courtesy of Dr. Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction

Transcript of Disaster Resilient Megacities

Page 1: Disaster Resilient Megacities

STRATEGIES FOR BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT

DURING 2013

Page 2: Disaster Resilient Megacities

PART 3: MAKE THE MEGACITIES MORE

DISASTER RESILIENT

Page 3: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITIES FACE HUGE DISASTERS FROM …

MEGACITIES FACE HUGE DISASTERS FROM …

• EARTHQUAKES• FLOODS• SEVERE

WINDSTORMS• LANDSLIDES• VOLCANIC

ERUPTIONS• WILDFIRES• TSUNAMIS• DROUGHTS

• EARTHQUAKES• FLOODS• SEVERE

WINDSTORMS• LANDSLIDES• VOLCANIC

ERUPTIONS• WILDFIRES• TSUNAMIS• DROUGHTS

Page 4: Disaster Resilient Megacities

WHAT HISTORY TEACHESWHAT HISTORY TEACHES

• CITIES AND MEGACITIES EXIST BY GEOLOGIC, HYDROLOGIC, AND ATMOSPHERIC CONSENT, WHICH CAN BE WITHDRAWN WITHOUT NOTICE.

• CITIES AND MEGACITIES EXIST BY GEOLOGIC, HYDROLOGIC, AND ATMOSPHERIC CONSENT, WHICH CAN BE WITHDRAWN WITHOUT NOTICE.

Page 5: Disaster Resilient Megacities

A DISASTER OCCURS WHEN THE MEGACITY’S PUBLIC

POLICIES ALLOW IT TO BE …

UN—PREPARED

UN—PROTECTED

UN--WARNED

UN—ABLE TO RESPOND EFFECTIVELY

UN (NON)—RESILIENT IN RECOVERY

Page 6: Disaster Resilient Megacities

QUESTION

• WHAT IS A MEGACITY AND WHAT VULNERABILITY REDUCTION MEASURES WILL MAKE IT LESS VULNERABLE TO THE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS OF A NATURAL HAZARD?

Page 7: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITIES IN 1900WORLD POPULATION:

1.6 BILLION

MEGACITIES IN 1900WORLD POPULATION:

1.6 BILLION

• TOKYO: 21.9 M• NEW YORK: 15.6 M• MEXICO CITY: 13.9 M• SAO PAULO: 12.5 M• SHANGHAI: 11.7

• TOKYO: 21.9 M• NEW YORK: 15.6 M• MEXICO CITY: 13.9 M• SAO PAULO: 12.5 M• SHANGHAI: 11.7

• OSAKA: 10.0 M• BUENOS AIRES: 9.9 M• LOS ANGELES: 9.5 M• CALCUTA 9.0 M• BEIJING 9.0 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

• OSAKA: 10.0 M• BUENOS AIRES: 9.9 M• LOS ANGELES: 9.5 M• CALCUTA 9.0 M• BEIJING 9.0 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

Page 8: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITIES IN 2000WORLD POPULATION:

6 BILLION

MEGACITIES IN 2000WORLD POPULATION:

6 BILLION

• TOKYO: 25.4 M• BOMBAY: 18.6 M• MEXICO CITY: 18.3 M• SAO PAULO: 18.0 M• NEW YORK: 16.7 M

• TOKYO: 25.4 M• BOMBAY: 18.6 M• MEXICO CITY: 18.3 M• SAO PAULO: 18.0 M• NEW YORK: 16.7 M

• LAGOS: 14.1 M• CALCUTA 13.2 M• LOS ANGELES: 13.2 M• SHANGHAI: 13.0 M• BUENOS AIRES: 12.7 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

• LAGOS: 14.1 M• CALCUTA 13.2 M• LOS ANGELES: 13.2 M• SHANGHAI: 13.0 M• BUENOS AIRES: 12.7 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

Page 9: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITIES IN 2020WORLD POPULATION:

10 BILLION

MEGACITIES IN 2020WORLD POPULATION:

10 BILLION

• BOMBAY: 28.5 M• TOKYO: 27.3 M• LAGOS: 26.5 M• DHAKA: 24.0 M• KARACHI: 21.7 M

• BOMBAY: 28.5 M• TOKYO: 27.3 M• LAGOS: 26.5 M• DHAKA: 24.0 M• KARACHI: 21.7 M

• SAO PAULO: 21.3 M • MEXICO CITY: 19.6 M• JAKARTA: 19.4• CALCUTA 18.8 M• NEW DEHLI: 18:4 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

• SAO PAULO: 21.3 M • MEXICO CITY: 19.6 M• JAKARTA: 19.4• CALCUTA 18.8 M• NEW DEHLI: 18:4 M• SOURCE: THE

POPULATION INSTITUTE 2/3/01

Page 10: Disaster Resilient Megacities

TOKYO IS A MEGACITY AT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS

TOKYO IS A MEGACITY AT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS

Page 11: Disaster Resilient Megacities

CAIRO IS A MEGACITY AT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS

CAIRO IS A MEGACITY AT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS

Page 12: Disaster Resilient Megacities

ISTHANBUL IS A MEGACITY AT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDSISTHANBUL IS A MEGACITY AT

RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS

Page 13: Disaster Resilient Megacities

ISTHANBUL: CAUSES OF VULNERABILITIES

ISTHANBUL: CAUSES OF VULNERABILITIES

• SIZE• FRAGILITY OF

EXISTING BUIDINGS/ INFRASTRUCTURE

• INADEQUATE PROTECTION MEASURES

• CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND PRACTICES

• SIZE• FRAGILITY OF

EXISTING BUIDINGS/ INFRASTRUCTURE

• INADEQUATE PROTECTION MEASURES

• CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND PRACTICES

Page 14: Disaster Resilient Megacities

SAN FRANCISCO: DEPENDENT ON TRANSPORTATION

SAN FRANCISCO: DEPENDENT ON TRANSPORTATION

• DAMAGE TO ONE SPAN OF THE BAY BRIDGE IN 1989 CHANGED THE LIVES OF MILLIONS AND DISRUPTED MANY BUSINESSES.

• NO ONE KNOWS THE TRUE COST.

• DAMAGE TO ONE SPAN OF THE BAY BRIDGE IN 1989 CHANGED THE LIVES OF MILLIONS AND DISRUPTED MANY BUSINESSES.

• NO ONE KNOWS THE TRUE COST.

Page 15: Disaster Resilient Megacities

LOS ANGELES: DEPENDENT ON UTILITY SYSTEMS

LOS ANGELES: DEPENDENT ON UTILITY SYSTEMS

• DAMAGE TO A UTILIYY CORRIDOR CAUSED WIDESPREAD OUTAGES OF POWER, GAS, WATER, AND WASTE CENTERS.

• OUTAGES LED TO LOSSES IN THE BILLIONS.

• DAMAGE TO A UTILIYY CORRIDOR CAUSED WIDESPREAD OUTAGES OF POWER, GAS, WATER, AND WASTE CENTERS.

• OUTAGES LED TO LOSSES IN THE BILLIONS.

Page 16: Disaster Resilient Megacities

SAN FRANCISCO: SUSCEPTIBLE TO FIRE

SAN FRANCISCO: SUSCEPTIBLE TO FIRE

Page 17: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITYMEGACITYMEGACITYMEGACITYDATA BASES DATA BASES AND INFORMATIONAND INFORMATIONDATA BASES DATA BASES AND INFORMATIONAND INFORMATION

HAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS

•NAT. HAZARDS•INVENTORY•VULNERABILITY•LOCATION

RISK ASSESSMENTRISK ASSESSMENT

RISK

ACCEPTABLE RISK

UNACCEPTABLE RISK

VULNERABILITY VULNERABILITY REDUCTONREDUCTON

•PREPAREDNESS•PRPTECTION•EARLY WARNING•EMERGENCY RESPONSE•RECOVERY •EDUCATIONAL SURGES

DISASTER DISASTER RESILIENCERESILIENCE

Page 18: Disaster Resilient Megacities

QUESTION

• CAN WE MAKE MEGACITIES MORE RESILIENT TO NATURAL HAZARDS?

Page 19: Disaster Resilient Megacities

YESBUT, IT IS A TIME-, PEOPLE-,, AND STAPLE- DEPENDENT

PROCESS!

Page 20: Disaster Resilient Megacities
Page 21: Disaster Resilient Megacities

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

• NATURAL HAZARDS, GENERATE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS WHICH CREATE RISK TO THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT.

• THE CHOICE: LIVE WITH UNACCEPTABLE RISK OR ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RISK.

• NATURAL HAZARDS, GENERATE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS WHICH CREATE RISK TO THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT.

• THE CHOICE: LIVE WITH UNACCEPTABLE RISK OR ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RISK.

Page 22: Disaster Resilient Megacities

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

• UNACCEPTABLE RISK CALLS FOR PUBLIC POLICIES TO REDUCE VULNER-ABILITIES.

Page 23: Disaster Resilient Megacities

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

• VULNERABILITIES REFLECT POLICY FLAWS WITH RESPECT TO PREPAREDNESS, PROTECTION, EARLY WARNING, EMERGENCY RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY

Page 24: Disaster Resilient Megacities

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

INTERLOCKING CONCEPTS ON MEGACITIES AND NATURAL HAZARDS

• PREPAREDNESS, PROTECTION, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY ARE THE MOST EFFECTIVE MEASURES.

• BUT, THEY ARE HARD TO SELL TO THE PUBLIC AND TAKE TIME TO IMPLEMENT.

• PREPAREDNESS, PROTECTION, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY ARE THE MOST EFFECTIVE MEASURES.

• BUT, THEY ARE HARD TO SELL TO THE PUBLIC AND TAKE TIME TO IMPLEMENT.

Page 25: Disaster Resilient Megacities

MEGACITY DISASTER RESILIENCEMEGACITY DISASTER RESILIENCEMEGACITY DISASTER RESILIENCEMEGACITY DISASTER RESILIENCE

WHAT’S NEEDED: A COMMON AGENDAWHAT’S NEEDED: A COMMON AGENDA(CA) OF TECHNICAL (CA) OF TECHNICAL

AND POLITICAL SOLUTIONSAND POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

WHAT’S NEEDED: A COMMON AGENDAWHAT’S NEEDED: A COMMON AGENDA(CA) OF TECHNICAL (CA) OF TECHNICAL

AND POLITICAL SOLUTIONSAND POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

TECHNICAL TECHNICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONSTECHNICAL TECHNICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS

POLITICAL POLITICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONSPOLITICAL POLITICAL

SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS

CACA

Page 26: Disaster Resilient Megacities

THE EFFECTIVE SOLUTION FOR THE EFFECTIVE SOLUTION FOR GREATER DISASTER RESILIENCE GREATER DISASTER RESILIENCE THE EFFECTIVE SOLUTION FOR THE EFFECTIVE SOLUTION FOR

GREATER DISASTER RESILIENCE GREATER DISASTER RESILIENCE

FACT: BUILD ON EACH MEGACITY’S FACT: BUILD ON EACH MEGACITY’S UNIQUE STAPLE FACTORSUNIQUE STAPLE FACTORS

FACT: BUILD ON EACH MEGACITY’S FACT: BUILD ON EACH MEGACITY’S UNIQUE STAPLE FACTORSUNIQUE STAPLE FACTORS

TECHNICAL TECHNICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONSTECHNICAL TECHNICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS

POLITICAL POLITICAL SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONSPOLITICAL POLITICAL

SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS

STAPLE STAPLE FACTORSFACTORSSTAPLE STAPLE

FACTORSFACTORS

PPPP

TTTTSSSS

OOOO

CACA

Page 27: Disaster Resilient Megacities

A COMMUNITY’S STAPLE FACTORS ARE UNIQUE

• SOCIAL

• TECHNICAL

• ADMINISTRATIVE

• POLITICAL

• LEGAL

• ECONOMIC

Page 28: Disaster Resilient Megacities
Page 29: Disaster Resilient Megacities