Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes

European Commission - DG Environment

Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection

of animals used for scientific purposes

“Opportunities and challenges”

Berlin, 31.1.- 2.2.2011

Susanna Louhimies

CAAT-Europe / ecopa – Workshop‘Opportunities for the 3Rs’


Directive 2010/63/EU‘Opportunities and challenges’

The revised Directive

- Main differences

- The principle of the Three Rs with two examples

- Alternative approaches

Opportunities

Challenges and responses

Conclusions


The objectives of the revision

Significant increase in animal welfare

Level playing field for industry and academia

Active promotion and implementation of the principle of the Three Rs


Element Dir 86/609/EEC

Dir 2010/63/EU

Scope Vert. Ceph’s, imm.forms,

edu&training, basic research

Compliance with the Three Rs Yes Yes

Project evaluation No Yes

Project authorisation (Yes/No) Yes

Housing and care standards guidelines bindingstandards

Main differences between the current & the new Dir


Element Dir 86/609/EEC

Dir 2010/63/EU

Project follow-up (Yes) Yes

- Retrospective assessment No Yes

Non-technical summaries No Yes

Severity classification No Yes

Enforcement Periodic Min.targets

Main differences between the current & the new Dir


Main differences and the Three Rs

Explicitly spells out the principle of the Three Rs:Replacement, Reduction and Refinement(e.g. Recitals 10-13; Articles 4, 13)

Ensuring that Refinement is not limited to scientific procedures but also relevant in relation to care, accommodation and breeding of animals

The development, validation and use of alternativeapproaches more firmly anchored


Systematic Project (ethical) evaluation

(Art 38)

The aims and objectives of the project

Application of the Three Rs – Annex VI

Severity classification of the procedures – Annex VIII

Harm-benefit analysis of the project

to assess the contents for:

and to determine the need for a retrospective assessment

resulting in more humane treatment ofanimals and improved science.



1. Relevance and justification of the following:

(a) use of animals including their origin, estimated numbers, species and life stages;

(b) procedures.

2. Application of methods to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in procedures.

3. The planned use of anaesthesia, analgesia and other pain relieving methods.

the application of the Three Rs as per Annex VI (1/3)



4. Reduction, avoidance and alleviation of any form of animal suffering, from birth to death where appropriate.

5. Use of humane end-points.

6. Experimental or observational strategy and statistical design to minimise animal numbers, pain, suffering, distress and environmental impact where appropriate.

7. Reuse of animals and the accumulative effect thereof on the animals.




8. The proposed severity classification of procedures.

9. Avoidance of unjustified duplication of procedures where appropriate.

10. Housing, husbandry and care conditions for the animals.

11. Methods of killing.

12. Competence of persons involved in the project.




The aims and objectives of the project

Application of the Three Rs – Annex VI

Severity classification of the procedures – Annex VIII

Harm-benefit analysis of the project

to assess the contents for:

and to determine the need for a retrospective assessment

resulting in more humane treatment ofanimals and improved science.


Animal Welfare Body(Art 26)

advising the staff on welfare of animals advising the staff on the application of the Three Rs

and especially the developments on their application establishing/reviewing internal operational processes following the development and outcome of projects, advising on re-homing schemes

To bring the Three Rs alive and foster the climate of care by


Alternative approaches

• EU reference laboratory for the validation of alternative approaches

• Member States to assist by identifying and nominating suitable laboratories for validation studies

• Member States to appoint a single point of contact forassessment of regulatory relevance of a method

• Member States to promote alternatives at national level

• The Commission to promote at international level


Key dates

• Entry into force on 10 November 2010

• Transposition to be completed by 10 November 2012

• The Directive taking full effect by 1 Jan 2013


Opportunities

• Increase animal welfare through a systematic implementation of the Three Rs

• Improve science

• Reduce ‘waste’

• Cut down red tape – follow best practice

• Increase public confidence through improved enforcement and transparency

• Alternatives: cut down costs, create new business opportunities…


Challenges

• Uniform understanding and interpretation

• Available resources (both with administrations as well as with breeders/suppliers/users)

• Existing infrastructures

• Change in mindset (top down)

• Rolling out of the concept of climate of care

• Transposition or a copy/paste exercise

• Time…


Set up the infrastructure and designate the appropriate competent authorities (Art 59) for

• Project evaluation• Project authorisation • Retrospective assessment• Inspections• Granting of specific exemptions

Establish a National Animal Welfare Committee (Art 49)

Responding to the challenge- the role of Member States


Streamlined processes, clear responsibilities, avoidance of duplication of tasks – identification of the optimum set-up (national, regional, local)

Make users, breeders and suppliers take ownershipof the Three Rs – control the establishment of AWBs

Contribution into the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods

Dissemination and promotion of alternative approaches

Responding to the challenge- the role of Member States


Transposition and implementation action plan together with the Member States

Stakeholder expert discussions to arrive at a common understanding of specific terms used in the text (such as ‘debilitating clinical condition’, ‘prolonged suffering’)

Legal interpretation (e.g. use of animals in the army)

Responding to the challenge- the role of the Commission


Answering the challenge -the Commission’s role

Establishment of the format and contents for statistical reporting

Establishment of the EU reference laboratory

Development of guidance on education and training requirements for personnel

Feasibility studies on NHPs

Thematic reviews


Conclusions

• The revised Directive is based on the latest scientific knowledge, extensive expert and stakeholder consultation, and a thorough impact assessment.

• The outcome of the lengthy negotiations represents a good compromise which strikes the right balance.

• The principle of the Three Rs is embedded in the text and brought alive through a number of specific provisions.


Conclusions

• With the new Directive EU has the most advanced legislation in the world providing a flexible framework for the current and future research to flourish whilst taking fully into account the welfare requirements of the animals

• The timely and intelligent transposition is a challenge requiring reflection and effort from all.

• There is a true opportunity to breath life into the Three Rs – what is your response to the challenge?


The text of the revised Directive

Thank you for your attention !

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/home_en.htm

Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes

Documents

Transcript of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes