Direct Analysis of Selected Per and Polyfluorinated Alkyl ... Cristina C. Jacob1, Claudia P.B....

download Direct Analysis of Selected Per and Polyfluorinated Alkyl ... Cristina C. Jacob1, Claudia P.B. Martins1,

If you can't read please download the document

  • date post

    24-Jul-2020
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    3
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Direct Analysis of Selected Per and Polyfluorinated Alkyl ... Cristina C. Jacob1, Claudia P.B....

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific • 355 River Oaks Pkwy • San Jose, CA 95134, USA • thermofisher.com

    Cristina C. Jacob1, Claudia P.B. Martins1, Alan R. Atkins1, Richard F. Jack1 1Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA, UK

    Direct analysis of selected per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in ground, surface, and waste water by LC-MS/MS

    Figure 4. Overlaid chromatograms of 24 PFAS spiked at 60 ng/L in field samples: a) Reagent water; b) ground water; c) surface water; and d) waste water.

    Figure 1. Overlaid chromatograms of all PFAS compounds included in this method.

    Figure 5. Overlaid chromatograms of a ground water sample spiked at 60 ng/L: a) 15 μL injection volume; b) 25μL injection volume.

    Figure 2. Representative calibration curves for a) PFOS and b) PFTriA, and chromatograms of an injection of 1 ng/L, which is five times lower than the reporting limit of quantitation.

    Figure 3. PFAS overlaid chromatograms: a) method blank sample and b) reporting limit checking sample spiked at 10 ng/L.

    ABSTRACT Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have unique properties in consumer products that lead to a wide variety of uses. Unfortunately, their toxicity, bioaccumulation, prevalence and persistence in waters and soils make them a hot topic and global concern. The traditional compounds studied to investigate environmental impacts have focused on two compounds, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanoic acid sulfonate (PFOS). However, it is now well established that there are possibly 3-4000 forms that can vary in length, linear or branched and ether telomer forms. The term used for this variety is now designated as per- and polyfluorinated acids (PFAS). PFAS chain lengths vary from C2-C14 and are a combination of linear and branched structures. The chemical properties for PFAS compounds, background concentrations and presence in sampling equipment, instrumentation and lack of standards make analysis and accurate quantitation a real challenge. Though EPA 537 and 537.1 have been developed by the EPA, these are only validated in drinking water matrices and have a limited set of linear compounds. Several branches of the US EPA are in the process of validating methods for PFAS in water and soils using direct injection and SPE followed by LC-MS/MS.

    CONCLUSIONS The method referenced in this application note shows excellent quantitative performance of the TSQ Altis mass spectrometer for PFAS direct analysis in the low ng/L range in non-drinking water matrices.

    • The Accucore RP-MS column provides excellent chromatographic separation and maintains robustness in challenging water matrices.

    • The TSQ Altis mass spectrometer can quantitate the majority of PFAS compounds five times lower than the LLOQ reporting requirements in ASTM D7979-17 and EPA 8327.

    • PFAS compounds were detected in the different water matrices at both low and high spike concentrations with recoveries within the range required.

    • All spiked water samples, in a variety of matrices, showed RSDs below 20% for most of the PFAS compounds, demonstrating the high robustness and reproducibility of the method.

    REFERENCES 1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

    Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFCs), https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/perflourinated_ chemicals_508.pdf (Accessed November 27, 2018)

    2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), https://www.epa.gov/pfas (Accessed November 27, 2018)

    3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). An Overview of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Interim Guidance for Clinicians Responding to Patient Exposure Concerns. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfc/docs/pfas_clinician_fact_sh eet_508.pdf (Accessed November 29, 2018)

    4. Stahl, T., Mattern, D., Brunn, H. Toxicology of perfluorinated compounds. Environmental Sciences Europe 2011, 23, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715- 23-38

    5. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Method 537. Determination of Selected Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Drinking Water by Solid Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100EQ6 W.txt (Accessed November 27, 2018)

    6. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 3 (UCMR3). https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/third-unregulated- contaminant-monitoringrule (Accessed November 27, 2018)

    7. ASTM D7979-17, Standard Test Method for Determination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water, Sludge, Influent, Effluent and Wastewater by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, www.astm.org (Accessed November 27, 2018)

    8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA 537.1 DETERMINATION OF SELECTED PERFLUORINATED ALKYL ACIDS IN DRINKING WATER BY SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION AND LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY (LC/MS/MS). EPA document #: EPA/600/R-18/352

    TRADEMARKS/LICENSING © 2019 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. Acrodisc is a trademark of Pall Corporation. Falcon is a trademark of Corning Life Sciences. Wellington is a trademark of Wellington Laboratories Inc. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manner that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

    PO30633

    RESULTS Excellent chromatographic separation was achieved on an Accucore RP-MS analytical column using different mobile phases compositions. Figure 1 shows an overlaid chromatogram of all PFAS compounds analyzed in this method.

    Excellent linearity and quantitative accuracy were achieved over the range of 5 to 200 ng/L, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.99 for all transitions and the respective residuals within 20% of the nominal values. Representative calibration curves for PFOS and PFTriA are shown in Figure 2, with correlation coefficients of 0.9955 and 0.9950, respectively. Figure 2 also shows chromatograms of overlaid quantitation and confirming ions injected at 1 ng/L, which is five times lower than the LLOQ reported by ASTM D7979-17 for these two compounds. Additionally, Table 3 shows the LLOQs for all 24 PFAS analyzed in this method, based on accuracy and RSD ≤20%, demonstrating the high sensitivity achieved with the TSQ Altis mass spectrometer for the quantitation of PFAS at very low levels (ppt range).

    Control samples Table 4 summarizes the method control criteria, and the results demonstrate all compounds passed in this method. Figure 3 shows the overlaid chromatogram of all PFAS of a method blank and a reagent water spiked at 10 ng/L (LLOQ checking sample) and taken through sample preparation. PFBA and PFPeA are quantifiable at an injected concentration of 5 ng/L, which is much lower than the reported limit of quantitation in EPA 8327 and ASTM D7979 (25 ng/L without considering 2- fold dilution in methanol).

    Sample analysis Each water matrix was spiked at low and high concentrations as described, (N=5 ea.) The 60 samples received were divided into three batches of 20 samples and analyzed on three different days. All 24 PFAS compounds were detected and quantifiable at both low and high spike concentrations. Figure 4 shows an example of overlaid chromatograms of all PFAS spiked at 60 ng/L in reagent, ground, surface, and waste samples. In Figure 4 fronting was observed with the first eluting chromatographic peaks in ground, surface, and waste water samples due to the overload of the analytical column by large injection volumes (25 μL). Reduced injection volumes (15 μL) improved peak shape and will also improve robustness (due to less matrix on column) while still maintaining good sensitivity as shown in Figure 5.

    Table 1. List of PFAS compounds included in this method.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS This poster presentation describes the quantitation of selected PFAS in reagent, ground, surface, and waste water based on the recent EPA 8327 method. The list of PFAS included in this study is shown in Table 1.

    LC-MS/MS analysis Since the required limits of detection are in the low ng/L range, careful selection of reagents and consumables is necessary to ensure they are PFAS-free. The LC-MS/MS system comprised a Thermo Scientific™ Vanquish™ Flex Binary UHPLC system fitted with a Thermo Scientific™ PFC-free kit and interfaced with a Thermo Scientific™ TSQ Altis™ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a HESI ionization probe. An isolator column was also installed after the LC pump and prior to the injection valve to offset background contaminants from the LC pump, autosampler, degasser, and mobile phases.

    Data processing Thermo Scientific™ Chromeleon™ Chromatography Data System software, version 7.2.9.

    The 5 mL water samples were then spiked with 40 μL of a 20 μg/L isotopically labeled PFAS surrogates solution (Table 1). 5 mL of methanol were added and the mixture vortexed for 1 minute. The mixture was then filtered through a washed Acrodisc® GxF/0.2 μm GHP membrane syringe-driven filter with methanol and acetonitrile (Pall Corporation). The 10 mL filtrates were acidified by addition of 10 μL of acetic acid, and an aliquot of each sample was transferred to a polypropylene autosampler vial sealed with a polyethylene cap with integrated polyethylene membrane.

    Test Method(s) European method EN:1948 standard solutions; EN-1948CVS, WM48-CVS (calibration and quantitation), EN-1948ES, EN