Dining Hall in Tripura

Dining Hall in Tripura

Mid Day Meal SchemeMDM-PAB Meeting –Mizoram on

01.05.2012 Ministry of HRDGovernment of India

Review of Implementation of MDMS in MIZORAM

(Primary + Upper Primary)

(1.4.2011 to 31.12.2011)

Part-I

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Issues raised by GOI

1. Significant increase in the no of children availed MDM against the PAB Approval in Lunglei(27%), Mamit(48%), and Serchhip(48%) districts.

2. Decrease in the no of children availed MDM against the PAB Approval in Kolasib District.

3. Difference in the figures quoted in the 3rd QPR and AWP & B 2011-12 in respect of cooking cost and honorarium to CCH

4. Delay in payment of honorarium to CCH

5. Irregular supply of rice to a no of schools pointed out in MI Report

S.No Districts PAB approval

Children availed MDM

%

I Primary Children

1 Mamith 11256 16682 148%

2 Secrehhip 4709 6960 148%

3 Lunglei 22451 28544 127%

II Upper Primary Children

1 Kolasib 4712 3757 - 20%

Significant increase/Decrease in Coverage of Children against PAB approval

Coverage of Institutions (Primary)

1421 1489 14841421 1489 1484

0

500

1000

1500

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Total No. of Institutions Coverage


No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

Coverage of Institutions (Upper Primary)

991 10071022

991 10071022

0

550

1100

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Total No. of Institutions Coverage


No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

1.07 1.09

1.37

1.041.00

1.10

0.99 1.01

1.26

0

0.7

1.4

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Enrollment PAB Approval Achievement

Coverage of Children (Primary ) N

o.

of

Ch

ild

ren

(in

Lakh

s)

93% 93%92%

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaPercentage indicates coverage of children against the Total Enrollment

0.54 0.540.510.51

0.57

0.500.50 0.510.47

0

0.3

0.6

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Enrollment PAB Approval Achievement

Coverage of Children (Upper Primary) N

o.

of

Ch

ild

ren

(in

lakh

s) 93% 94%

92%

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaPercentage indicated coverage against Enrollment

No. of Working Days MDM Served ( Primary )

155 161 157157 167

157

0

85

170

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

PAB Approval Achievement


No.

of

Work

ing

Days

Total Working Days approval for 2011-12: 211 Days

No. of Working Days MDM Served : ( Upper Primary )

155 161 164157 161 164

0

90

180

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12PAB Approval Achievement


No.

of

Work

ing

Days

Total Working Days approval for 2011-12: 220 Days

Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (P + UP.)

3.193.39 3.42

2.35 2.442.75

0

2

4

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Approval Achievement


No.

of

Meals

(in

cro

re)

74% 72%

80%

Utilization of Food Grains(1.4.11 to 31.12.11)

329

3971

28963224 3141

0

1400

2800

4200

OB Allocation for 2011-12

Total Lifting Availability (Lifting + OB)

Utilisation


79%

FOOD GRAINS : ALLOCATION VS UTILISATION

37164021 3971

30152856

3141

0

1400

2800

4200

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Allocation for whole year Utilisation


Qu

an

tity

in

MTs

81%79%71%

Payment of Cost of Food grains to FCI

206

122 122

00

125

250

Allocation Bill raised by FCI Payment to FCI Pending Bills


100%

COOKING COST: ALLOCATION VS UTILISATION

9.90

12.10 12.83

9.008.62

10.1

0

7

14

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

ALLOCATION UTILISATION


Rs

in C

rore

s

91% 79%71%

Sr. No. District % Utilisation

of foodgrains

% Utilisation of Cooking

cost

Mis-match in % points

1 Serchhip 119% 77% -42

2 Mamit 94% 81% -13

3 Lunglei 90% 80% -10

4 Lawngtlai 63% 80% 16

5 Kolasib 66% 78% 12

6 Champhai 67% 77% 10

Mismatch between Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking Cost

Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers

7.316.75

0

3

6

9

Allocation Payment to CCH


92%

5044 CCH engaged during 2011-12 against PAB Approval of 4876State Share for Honorarium to CCH -600/ month

MME : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION

16.36

21.61

32.78

7.71

12.97

20.66

0

16

32

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

ALLOCATION UTILISATION


Rs in

Lakh

s

47%

63%

60%

Transportation Assistance : Allocation vs Utilisation

144.59

229.69

0

150

300

Allocation Utilisation


Rs in

Lakh

s

Expenditure includes dues of 2010-11

Construction of Kitchen cum Stores

64%

0%

36%33%

0%

67%

0%

50%

100%

Constructed In progress Yet to start

Physical Financial

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaMinistry of HRD, Govt. of India20

Total Units sanctioned : 2396

1533 KS 863 KS

Procurement of Kitchen Devices under MDM

100% 100%

0%

50%

100%

ProcuredPhysical Financial

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaMinistry of HRD, Govt. of India21

Total Sanctioned : 2428

Coverage : School Health Programme and Inspections

2506

00

1500

3000

Inspections

Total Schools Coverage


No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

Coverage : School Health Programme

2506

1820

0

1500

3000

S H P

Total Schools Coverage


No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

73%

Coverage :School Health Programme

188508 188508 188508 188508

116516

30554

1080 59780

100000

200000

Health check-ups Iron-folic acid Vitamin A Deworming

Enrollment Achievement


Availability of Infrastructure

2506

627

88 860

1500

3000

Total No. Of schools

LPG Toilet facility Drinking facility


SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS

10.0

10.0

10.0

7.9

10.0

7.9

5.0

6.36.4

10

7.3

0.0

4.0

4.0

0.02.04.06.08.010.0

InstitutionsChildren

Working Days

Foodgrain Utilsation

Payment to FCI

Cooking Cost

Fund FlowMMEKitchen Shed

Kitchen Devices

TA

School Health

Inspection

Drinking Water

Toilet Facility

10


ISSUES

1. State Share was not released during first 3 quarters of FY 2011-12. None of the sample schools had ever received cooking cost for MDM in advance, MDM is managed by school authorities by taking credit (MI Findings).

2. SSMC meetings are not held during 2011-12.

3. Inspections data is not provided in the QPRs.

MI Findings Districts covered : Kolasib & Mamit

1. Food grains are not delivered at the school level, schools are making their own arrangements.

2. None of the sample schools had ever received cooking cost for MDM in advance., schools had to either purchase the required ingredients on credit by paying higher cost or have to use funds from other resources to implement MDM.

3. Roster for parents and community members for day-to-day supervision of the MDM was not prepared in schools.

4. None of the sample schools had displayed the weekly menu for MDM.

4. Participation of parents in supervision and management was reported to be very low.

5. Only 2.5% of sample schools maintained health cards/registers.

6. Micronutrients such as Iron and folic acid, were given to children occasionally by 5%, of the sample schools.

7. 62.5% of sample schools did not organize any program for the health check-up of children.

Contd..

Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2012-13


PART-II

Proposal for 2012-13 : Children (Primary)

1.10

1.26

1.12

1.231.27 1.37

1.27

0.0

0.6

1.2

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaMinistry of HRD, Govt. of India

Pro

po

sal f

or

2012

-13

Ava

iled

MD

M in

Q-3

Ava

iled

MD

M in

Q-2

31

Ava

iled

MD

M in

Q-1

En

rolm

ent

Ava

iled

MD

M (

9 m

on

ths)

PA

B A

pp

rova

l 11-

12

Proposal for 2012-13 : Children (Upper Primary)

0.500.47 0.46 0.45 0.47

0

0

1

Column1

0.510.47


Pro

po

sal

for

2012

-13

Ava

iled

MD

M in

Q-3

A

vaile

d M

DM

in Q

-2

32

Ava

iled

MD

N in

Q-1

En

rolm

en

t

Ava

iled

MD

M (

9 m

on

ths)

PA

B A

pp

rova

l fo

r 11

-12

Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM SchemeProposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme


Engaged Engaged during 2011-12during 2011-12

Proposal forProposal for(2012-13)(2012-13)

Cook-cum-helper 5044 5044

33

Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-StoreProposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store


No. of No. of SchoolsSchools

SanctionedSanctioned Constructed Constructed through through

convergenceconvergence

GapGap Proposal Proposal for 2012-13for 2012-13

2506 2396 - 110 No proposal

34

Proposal for Procurement of Kitchen DevicesProposal for Procurement of Kitchen Devices


No. of No. of Schools Schools

SanctionedSanctioned Procured Procured through through

convergenceconvergence

GapGap Replacement Replacement

2506 2428 0 78 608

35

Proposal for FY 2012-13686 = 78 (Gap)+ 608(Replacement)

Proposals and Recommendations


S. No Component PAB Approval 2011-12

Proposal for 2012-13 Recommendation

11 Children (Pry)Children (Pry) 110000 126408 127000

2 Children (U Pry)Children (U Pry) 50000 47018 47000

33 Working Days (Pry Working Days (Pry and U Pry)and U Pry)

211(Pry)220 (U.Pry)

215(Pry)220 (U.Pry)

215(Pry)220 (U.Pry)

44 Kitchen cum StoreKitchen cum Store 863 No proposal -

55 Cook cum HelperCook cum Helper 4876 5044 5044

66 Kitchen DevicesKitchen Devices 0 686 = 78 (Gap)+

608(Replacement)

686 = 78 (Gap)+

608(Replacement)

36

Thank You

Dining Hall in Tripura

Documents

Transcript of Dining Hall in Tripura