Dina C. Magnaye, PhD, EnP School of Urban and Regional ... · PDF fileof national and local...
Transcript of Dina C. Magnaye, PhD, EnP School of Urban and Regional ... · PDF fileof national and local...
Paper presented at the 8th CBMS Philippines National Conference held at SMX Convention Center, Pasay City, Philippines on March 19-21, 2012
Dina C. Magnaye, PhD, EnPSchool of Urban and Regional Planning
University of the Philippines
1
BackgroundBackground Poverty is central to any planning activity of
human settlements with poverty reduction as the overarching goal
Integration of poverty reduction efforts and inequality improvements in the formulation of national and local development plans
Prioritization of the poor in development interventions to increase their income and improve access to basic services
2
General ObjectiveGeneral Objective
Develop a framework to mainstream pro-poor planning integrated approach in local development planning
3
Examine the existing poverty-based information systems;
Identify the core dimensions of poverty and characterize the degree of poverty;
Determine the relationship between geographical or spatial poverty targeting and investment programming;
Define the factors affecting the likelihood of being income poor and capability poor; and
Identify the mechanisms to address the needs of the income and capability poor.
Specific ObjectivesSpecific Objectives4
Tarlac Province has 17 municipalities, one city, and 511 barangays (411 rural and
100 urban).
The Study AreaThe Study Area5
Tarlac Province has 17 municipalities, 1 city, and
511 barangays (411 rural and 100 urban)
6 Type of Settlement
Sample Municipa-lity/City
Income Classification
(2007)
Number of Sample
Households
Small Town San Manuel Pura
4th
4th4,9474,658
Medium Town
Gerona 1st 17,506
Large Town Capas 1st 23,100
Small City Tarlac City Component 59,933
Total 110,144
Sample Municipalities and City
Conceptual FrameworkConceptual Framework
7
Poverty Landscape Characterization
Spatial Poverty
Analysis &Mapping
Poverty Targeting
Results and DiscussionA. Poverty Landscape Characterization and Poverty Mapping
Poverty Dimensions
Findings
Survival Needs
Favorable health and nutrition condition
Child death among 0-5 years old children<1.0%Maternal mortality rate <1.0%Low proportion of malnourished children = 1.44%
Low level of poverty in water and sanitation
Households with access to community water system = 93.75%Households with access to sanitary toilet facilities = 92.30%
9
Results and DiscussionA. Poverty Landscape Characterization and Poverty Mapping
Poverty Dimensions Findings
Security Needs
Adequately satisfied housing needs
HH living in makeshift housing = 3.0%HH living in informal settlements = 3.46%
Generally a peaceful province
Almost nil proportion of victims of crime
Low participation in community organization
Low membership in community organizations=1.36%
High participation of voters in electoral process
Participation rate in electoral process = 82.67%
10
Results and DiscussionA. Poverty Landscape Characterization and Poverty Mapping
Poverty Dimensions Findings
Enabling Needs
Relatively high magnitude of capability poverty in education
Children 6-12 years old not attending elementary school = 23.53% Children 13-16 years old not attending high school = 39.98%
High income poverty among households
HH with income below poverty thresholds = 43.94%HH with income below food thresholds = 29.45%
11
Results and DiscussionA. Poverty Landscape Characterization and Poverty Mapping
Poverty Dimensions FindingsEnabling NeedsLow unemployment level
Unemployed members of the labor force = 3.80%
Deprivation in basic human needs in almost all towns and one city
47% of households have unsatisfied capability needs
12
Results and DiscussionB. Spatial Distribution of Poverty
Spatial Distribution Measure
Findings
Moderate degree of spatial inequality
Dissimilarity Index (D) = 0.49
Random pattern of capability poverty
Capability poor has almost attained maximum spatial concentration possible
Non-capability poor are more concentrated than capability poor
13
Results and DiscussionB. Spatial Distribution of Poverty
Spatial Distribution
Measure
Findings
Relatively weak local economy
Majority of the municipalities and one city of Tarlac Province have LQ<1.0 indicating less specialization in most of the local economic activities, excluding agriculture, mining and forestry; and community, social or personal services.
Deficits in local employment given negative Minimum Requirement Technique (MRT) values
14
Results and DiscussionC.1 Area/Location-Based
Poverty Targeting
16
• Capability deprived towns are concentrated in the western portion of the province
• Characterized with steep slopes,hilly portions and forested lands
• Areas are severely eroded and lahar prone;
• Relatively large number of indigenous settlers are located
First Level Location-Based Poverty Targeting Scheme
Results and DiscussionC.1 Area/Location-
Based PovertyTargeting
17
Second Level Location-Based
Poverty Targeting Scheme
• Selection of capability deprived barangays
Results and DiscussionC.2 Beneficiary Targeting
18
Capability Deprived
Municipalities
Capability Deprived
Barangays
Target Number of Household
s
FirstPriority
Households (≥5.0 SCI)
Second Priority
Households (3-4 SCI)
ThirdPriority
Households (1-2 SCI)
Sta. Ignacia NambalanBaldios, Sta. Ines East,Pugo-Cecilio,Pilpila, PoblacionWest,San Francisco 2,470 62 911 1,497
San Jose Maamot, Sula, David, Labney 1,488 391 493 631
Results and DiscussionC.2 Beneficiary Targeting
19
Capability Deprived
Municipalities
Capability Deprived
Barangays
Target Number of Households
FirstPriority
Households (≥5.0 SCI)
Second Priority
Households (3-4 SCI)
ThirdPriority
Households (1.0-2.0 SCI)
San Manuel San AgustinLegaspiLanatColubot 1,208 67 497 644
Mayantoc LabneyGayonggayongMamonit 731 74 230 427
Capas Sta. JulianaBuenoMaruglu 1,146 318 473 355
Gerona Sta. Lucia 166 37 109 20
Results and DiscussionC.3 Priority Development Sector Targeting
20
In terms of Annual Investment Program Allocation and Utilization
Results and DiscussionC.3 Priority Development Sector Targeting
21
In terms of Average Expenditures per Capita by Sector
Results and DiscussionC.3 Priority Development Sector Targeting
22
In terms of Share of Government Expenditures from the IRA
Results and DiscussionC.3 Priority Development Sector Targeting
23
In terms of the Principal Component Analysis
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
24
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Income Poor
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
25
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Income Poor
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project andActivity (PPA) Targeting
26
Logit Regression Results where Model p= Probability that a Household is Income Poor
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
27
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Capability Poor by Proximate Poverty Determinant and by Type of Barangay-
Based Core Local Poverty Indicator
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
28
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Capability Poor by Proximate Poverty Determinant and by Type of Barangay-
Based Core Local Poverty Indicator
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
29
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Capability Poor by Proximate Poverty Determinant and by Type of Barangay-Based Core Local Poverty Indicator
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
30
Results of the Logit Regression where Model p= Probability that a Household is Capability Poor by Proximate Poverty Determinant and by Type of Barangay-Based Core Local Poverty Indicator
Results and DiscussionC.4 Program, Project and Activity (PPA) Targeting
31
Proposed Program, Project, and Activities (PPAs)
Conclusion and Recommendation
Pre-Conditions on the Application of PPIA Model in Local Planning and Development
41
Applicability
Poverty data representing both income and capability indicators by basic human need should be made available.
LGU options: a) utilize the available CBMS data; b) adopt CBMS to generate poverty data; c) gather poverty data through local government agencies; or d) collect data through survey of sample households.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Pre-Conditions on the Application of PPIA Model in Local Planning and Development
42
Conclusion and Recommendation
Pre-Conditions on the Application of PPIA Model in Local Planning and Development
43
Conclusion and Recommendation
Pre-Conditions on the Application of PPIA Model in Local Planning and Development
44
Conclusion and Recommendation
Pre-Conditions on the Application of PPIA Model in Local Planning and Development
45
Transferability
• Human Resources and Skills (Capability Building)
• Financial Resources