Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

10
Digitizing out of commerce and orphan works – a (critical) french perspective Par Lionel Maurel (SavoirsCom1 / La Quadrature du Net) IFLA CLM/EBLIDA – Strasbourg 13/08/2014 E c r a n s i n f i n i s . P a r f d e c o m i t e . C C - B Y .

description

Intervention lors du Satellite Meeting IFLA/EBLIDA à Strasbourg, 2014.

Transcript of Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Page 1: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Digitizing out of commerce and orphan works – a (critical) french

perspective

Par Lionel Maurel (SavoirsCom1 / La Quadrature du Net)

IFLA CLM/EBLIDA – Strasbourg 13/08/2014

Ecrans infin

is. Par fdecom

ite. CC

-BY

.

Page 2: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

The initial situation● Stasse Report (2005) : first

propositions to digitize the « grey zone » of books (out of commerce works)

● 2009 : Google Books convicted in France for violation of copyright law (opt out system)

● 2010 : first attempt to vote a law in France for orphan works (photographies)

Par P

etah

opk ins. CC

-BY

-NC

-ND

But lot of uncertainty about ownership of rights on out of commerce works...

Page 3: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

2012 : Law on « unavailable books » and ReLIRE system

An hybrid collective management of rights for « unavailable books »

before 2001, with opt-out for authors and publishers

Page 4: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Strong oppositions from (some) authors

● Unavailable books are not out of commerce book

● Publishers breach their contractual obligations when books become out of commerce

● Therefore rights on out of commerce works should return to authors

● The law is unbalanced in favor of publishers

● Authors have to opt-out / a licence is proposed to publishers by the collective management society

● Accusations of « state piracy »

Pen3. Par Merlinprincesse. CC-BY-NC-ND

March 2014 : Law challenged in courts by authors, but not annulated by

Constitutionnal Council.Trial still pending before the Council

of State

Page 5: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Criticisms from a librarian perspective

● The ReLIRE project is strongly dependent on public funding

● Digitization will be conducted on the collections of the French National Library (BnF)

● But no public access on the digitized But no public access on the digitized books will be possiblebooks will be possible

● ReLIRE is only a commercial project

● No pedagogic or research uses

● No distinction between general literature and academic books

● No national licence

● No possibility to display this books on Europeana

Strong contrast with the Google Books Case in USA and consequent fair use

development (Hathi Trust Case)

Page 6: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Questions on the economic model

● Publishers were very reluctant to participate to the funding of the ReLIRE system because of lack of rentability

● Low perspectives with individual consumers (old books, DRM, etc.)

● Selling licences to french libraries ?

● What will be the position of french consortium ?

What is the sustainability of the ReLIRE system ?

Joe Schlabotnik. CC-BY

Page 7: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Orphan works, the ReLIRE system and the european

directive● The french law on unavailable

books doesn't deal directly with orphan works

● But with an opt out system, orphan works will be included in unavailable books

● Possibility for libraries to ask for a licence for « unreclaimed » books after 10 years

● But books can't be displayed on Internet, only on securised networks to library users...

Uncertainty about the articulationof the french law and

the european directive on orphan works.Finally, the two systems could co-exist.

Par

Au

ntie

G.

CC

-BY

-NC

-SA/

Page 8: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Alternatives ?● Bokhyla project in Norway :

extended collective licence for a national open access for books

● Fair use developments in USA after the Google Books Case and benefits for libraries

● Europeana respons to the public consultation on copyright reform : a new exception for libraries to digitize and display on Internet out of commerce works, with opt out for rights holders

Page 9: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Question of strategy for libraries ?

Teliko

82

. CC

-BY -N

C

● Orphan works and out of commerce works are just symptoms of deep pathologies that affect the copyright system

● Copyright lasts too long, no registration system of works, use of works considered as a prejudice

● No real « right » for the public to access and use works, just limitated exceptionsIs it possible to find a real solution to the orphan

and out of commerce works problem just with copyright exceptions ?

Page 10: Digitizing Out of Commerce and Orphan Works : a (critical) french perspective

Orphan works, out of commerce works and legalization of sharing

Sharing par ryancr. CC-BY-NC

● Propositions to legalize non-commercial sharing of works on Internet

● In a situation where sharing is legalized, orphan and out of commerce works could be displayed on Internet by libraries

● With a flat rate system, rights holders could have a remuneration for their works With the legalization of non-commercial sharing,

the problem of orphan and out of commerce works will be strongly limitated