Differences in DNA damage and repair in human...
Transcript of Differences in DNA damage and repair in human...
![Page 1: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Nelly Babayan1, Bagrat Grigoryan2, Lusine Khondkaryan1, Gohar Tadevosyan1, Ruzanna Grigoryan1, Natalya Sarkisyan1
1Institute of Molecular Biology NAS of RA 2”CANDLE” Synchrotron Research Institute
Differences in DNA damage and repair in human cancer and normal cells
after ultrashort pulsed electron beam irradiation
Yerevan, 2019
Targeting the DNA Damage Response in CML cells
International Workshop ‘Ultrafast Beams and Applications’ 2-5 July 2019, Yerevan, Armenia
![Page 2: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Every cell experiences up to 105 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day
Research overview: DNA damage response in cancer cells
Normal cell
No repair
Cell death
Tumor development
•Reduced DNA repair capacity
• Increased genetic instability
![Page 3: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy
© Dr. Stephen P. Jackson. Biochemical Society Transactions Jun 01, 2009, 37 (3) 483-494; DOI: 10.1042/BST0370483
![Page 4: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Synthetic lethal interactions in DNA repair genes implicated in cancer
© Helleday et al., Nature Reviews Cancer, 2008, vol 8, no. 3, pp. 193-204. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2342
Pathway Protein Syndrome Primary cancers HR BRCA1 breast, ovarian
BRCA2 Fanconi's anemia breast, ovarian
AD54B non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colon cancer
NHEJ MRE11 Ataxia-telangiectasia- like
disorder colorectal cancer
LIG4 LIG4 syndrome Leukemia
Artemis Omenn syndrome Lymphoma
NER XPA Xeroderma pigmentosum Skin cancers
ERCC1 cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome
squamous cell carcinoma, head /neck
Crosslink repair FANCA, B, C, D2, E Fanconi's anemia Various
etc.
![Page 5: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Olaparib treatment in BRCA-mut patients
© Ledermann, Lancet Oncol 2014
![Page 6: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Targeting DDR in cancer radiotherapy
![Page 7: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Aim: DDR in cancer and normal cells after UPEB radiation
Radiation Source: AREAL
AREAL: Laser-driven radiofrequency gun-based linear pulsed electron accelerator Electron beam: - UHPDR - 1.6x1010 Gy/sec -pulse duration - 0.04x10-12 s - Electron energy – 3.6 MeV
Application - Potential alternative acceleration technology for ion radiotherapy - More precise investigation of damage mechanisms
Radiobiological Endpoints
DNA damage and repair
Comparison of DNA damage response (DDR) in
cancer and normal cells
Identification of target DNA repair genes/proteins for synthetic
lethality therapy
![Page 8: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Endpoint: The level of DNA damage in cancer/normal cells
Method: Comet assay
K56
2
PBM
C
Control 1 Non-lethal 2 Sub-lethal 3 Lethal 4
Level of DNA damage in human normal (PBMCs, blood normal cells, female) and cancer (K562, blood cancer cells, female) cells after irradiation (0 h) at the non-lethal, sub-lethal and lethal doses
OTM - Olive Tail moment is defined as the product of the tail length and the fraction of total DNA in the tail
OTM: 5.9±1.4
Viability 90-100%
Viability 90-100% OTM: 2,9±0.6
Viability 50%
Viability 50%
OTM: 170,5±6.7
OTM: 19,1±2.6
Viability 0-10%
Viability 0-10%
OTM: ----
OTM: 82.9±2.4
![Page 9: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Endpoint: DNA repair in cancer/normal cells
Method: Comet assay
05
1015202530354045
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
OT
M
Dose, Gy
K562 (cancer cells) PBMC (normal cells)
The level of DNA-damage in PBMC (normal) and K562 cell line (cancer) cells after 3 hours of irradiation
OTM - Olive Tail moment is defined as the product of the tail length and the fraction of total DNA in the tail
![Page 10: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Endpoint: DNA repair kinetics in cancer/normal cells
Method: Comet assay
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
OT
M
Dose, Gy
K562 (cancer cells)PBMC (normal cells)
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
20
40
60
80
1000 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean
±S
EM
* *
*
* * *
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
50
100
150
200 0 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean
±S
EM
*
Comparison of the induced primary DNA-damage level and repair kinetics in PBMCs (a) and K562 (b) cells. *p<0.05 in comparison to corresponding control
PBMCs
K562 The level of DNA-damage in PBMC (blood normal cells, female) and K562 cell line (blood cancer cells, female) after 3 hours of irradiation
SSBs and DSBs
![Page 11: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Phosphorylation of Histone H2AX at DNA Double-Strand Breaks
γH2AX is a key regulator of the DNA damage response
DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are considered the most lethal form of DNA damage
© Fernandez-Capetillo et al., 2004
![Page 12: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Endpoint: DNA DSBs and repair kinetics in cancer and normal cells
Method: Flow cytometric analysis of γ-H2AX
The representative dot-plot (a1, b1) and histogram (a2, b2) of the level of γ-H2AX in PBMCs (a) and K562 cells (b) after sub-lethal (4 Gy) dose of irradiation
a1 a2 b1 b2
The kinetics of γ-H2AX foci formation in cancer (a) and normal (b) cells after lethal (8 Gy) and sub-lethal (4 Gy) doses of irradiation. *- p<0.05 in comparison with non-irradiated cells
a b
*
* *
* * *
* Foci_KCL
30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h0
10
20
30
40
4 Gy8 Gy
% o
f cell
s
Foci_PBMC
30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h0
20
40
60
80
4 Gy8 Gy
Time
% o
f cell
s
K562 PBMCs
![Page 13: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ionizing radiation induced-DNA SSBs/DSBs repair pathways
Non-Homologous End Joining NHEJ
Homologous Recombination Repair HRR
Base Excision Repair BER
FAST Error-prone
Core protein: DNA-PK
Slow Free of errors
Core protein: MRE11
FAST Free of errors
Core protein: APEX1
![Page 14: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DNA SSBs/DSBs repair pathway activation accompanied with cell cycle arrest
©https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult?img=PMC3413124_gks315f5&req=4
![Page 15: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
20
40
60
80
1000 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean±
SEM
* *
*
* * *
Endpoint: The activation of repair pathways in cancer/normal cells at the
non-lethal level of DNA damages Method: ELISA
Normal cells Cancer cells
DNA-PKMRE11
APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min 1 h
4 h
HRR >> BER >> NHEJ
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
50
100
150
200 0 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean
±S
EM
*
NHEJ >> HRR >> BER
DNA-PKMRE11
APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min 1 h
4 h
![Page 16: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
20
40
60
80
1000 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean±
SEM
* *
*
* * *
Normal cells Cancer cells
BER >> NHEJ >> HRR
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
50
100
150
200 0 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean
±S
EM
*
NHEJ = HRR >> BER DNA-PK
MRE11APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min 1 h
4 h DNA-PKMRE11
APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min 1 h
4 h
PI
Cco
unts
PI
Cco
unts
Endpoint: The activation of repair pathways in cancer/normal cells at the
sub-lethal level of DNA damages Method: ELISA
![Page 17: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
20
40
60
80
1000 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean±
SEM
* *
*
* * *
Normal cells Cancer cells
NHEJ >> HRR >> BER
0 0.5 1 2 4 80
50
100
150
200 0 h 30 min 1 h 4 h 24 h
Dose, Gy
OT
M, M
ean
±S
EM
*
BER >> NHEJ = HRR DNA-PK
MRE11APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min 1 h
4 h DNA-PKMRE11
APEX1
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 h30 min
1 h4 h
PI
Cco
unts
PI
Cco
unts
Endpoint:
The activation of repair pathways in cancer/normal cells at the lethal level of DNA damages
Method: ELISA
![Page 18: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions/Recommendations To increase the sensitivity of
cancer cells (CML) vs. normal cells
Target for synthetic lethality
Inhibition of DNA-PK (NHEJ pathway)
Normal cells HRR >> BER >> NHEJ
Cancer cells NHEJ >> HRR >> BER
Effective DNA repair
Non-effective DNA repair
Non-lethal dose of irradiation
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Lev
el o
f rep
air
path
way
ac
tivat
ion
Post-irraidation time, h
DNA-PKMRE11APEX1
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Lev
el o
f rep
air
path
way
ac
tivat
ion
Post-irradiation time, h
DNA-PKMRE11APEX1
Cancer cells
Decrease the time of dose delivery or fractionation of sub-
lethal dose Normal cells
![Page 19: Differences in DNA damage and repair in human …candle.am/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NellyBabayan.pdfEvery cell experiences up to 10 5 spontaneous or induced DNA lesions per day Research](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51b20c735aad48b1023c0a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thanks for Your Attention !!!
Acknowledgements
Dr., Prof. V. Tsakanov and Dr. B. Grigoryan – “CANDLE” Synchrotron Research Institute Dr., Prof. A. Osipov - A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biophysical Center, Moscow, RF Dr. Prof. R. Aroutiounian – Yerevan State University