DIFFERENCE

17
1

description

1. 2. DIFFERENCE. Outer stiffer laminate allows initial tooth movement. Inner softer laminate allows: Greater flexibility, retention and patient comfort. Longer duration of tooth movement per aligner. Less stress to teeth and bone. NuBrace Treatment Difference. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of DIFFERENCE

Page 1: DIFFERENCE

1

Page 2: DIFFERENCE

DIFFERENCE

2

Outer stiffer laminate allows initial tooth movement.Inner softer laminate allows:

Greater flexibility, retention and patient comfort.Longer duration of tooth movement per aligner.Less stress to teeth and bone.

Page 3: DIFFERENCE

NuBrace Treatment Difference

1. Each step clinician has option to:• Continue as planned.• Made additional changes.• Submit a new impression.

2. Hence: Dentist Exact Not Computer Projected.

Page 4: DIFFERENCE

Internal flexibility allows closer margins to minimize bacterial infiltration and improved retention

4

Page 5: DIFFERENCE

BAR (Bracketless Anti Resorption)• Groove placed on digital model for additional orthodontic

movement which translate into BAR inside the aligner.• Upon insertion, BAR gradually recovers for greater

orthodontic movement.• Void of unsightly attachments, improved oral hygiene and

esthetics.

Page 6: DIFFERENCE

Upon insertion, BAR initially compresses gradually recovers for greater orthodontic movement.

Page 7: DIFFERENCE

7

LOAD APPLICATION DURATION OF BILAMINATE ALIGNER MATERIAL

T. Kalili, A.A. Caputo, R. Mito, D. Nathanson, M. Matyas, S. Khalilnia

Page 8: DIFFERENCE

8

NuBrace demonstrated more gradual and >2 times longer duration of tooth movement v. the alternative unlaminated aligner.

Page 9: DIFFERENCE

STAGES OF LAMINATE DECOMPRESSION

9

Both laminates compress upon insertion.

Stiffer outer layer initiates tooth movement.

Inner layer allows additional movement

Page 10: DIFFERENCE

• #1 orthodontic concern is root and bone resorption minimized by gradual tooth movement.

• Longer duration of tooth movement leads to less chair time.

10

DISCUSSION

Page 11: DIFFERENCE

11

Biomechanics of Clear Aligner with Soft Inner Layer

T. Kalili,1 A.A. Caputo, et alUCLA School of Dentistry

Page 12: DIFFERENCE

12

More fringe, greater stress

Less stress to teeth and bone

Page 13: DIFFERENCE

1270 Laminated Orthodontic Removable aligner for Molar

Uprighting

T. Kalili, A.A. Caputo, R. Mito, I. Nishimura, et al

Page 14: DIFFERENCE

Laminated Orthodontic Removable aligner for Molar Uprighting

Page 15: DIFFERENCE

ABOVE – Conventional molar uprighting appliance showing significant localized tensile stress which may be damaging to teeth and bone.

ABOVE – NuBrace showing more uniform areas of stress to allow for a more gradual load with less localized stress to teeth and bone.

Page 16: DIFFERENCE

ABOVE – Conventional molar uprighting appliance showing unwanted stress in the anterior sextant unrelated to molar uprighting.

ABOVE – NuBrace does not require attachments + or arch bows for tooth movement therefore, minimal stress in unrelated areas.

Page 17: DIFFERENCE

17