DICION PAPER ERIEftp.iza.org/dp11915.pdf · 2018. 11. 15. · ATACT ZA DP o. 11915 CTBE 2018...
Transcript of DICION PAPER ERIEftp.iza.org/dp11915.pdf · 2018. 11. 15. · ATACT ZA DP o. 11915 CTBE 2018...
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
IZA DP No. 11915
Olivier DonniJosé Alberto Molina
Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence
OCTOBER 2018
Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity.The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society.IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–953113 Bonn, Germany
Phone: +49-228-3894-0Email: [email protected] www.iza.org
IZA – Institute of Labor Economics
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
IZA DP No. 11915
Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence
OCTOBER 2018
Olivier DonniTHEMA and Université de Cergy-Pontoise
José Alberto MolinaUniversity of Zaragoza and IZA
ABSTRACT
IZA DP No. 11915 OCTOBER 2018
Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence*
Household collective models celebrate their thirtieth birthday. The collective approach
constitutes, perhaps, the microeconomics topic that has produced the largest number
of papers (both published and in working paper/mimeo formats) during the last three
decades, beginning with the seminal paper published by P.A. Chiappori in Econometrica
(Chiappori, 1988). To add to some excellent surveys of household collective models (Strauss
et al., 2000; Vermeulen, 2002; Donni and Chiappori, 2011; Chiappori and Mazzocco,
2017), we here perform a bibliographic review of the literature, which includes theoretical
contributions, as well as the international empirical evidence related to the collective
approach. With respect to the theoretical papers, the collective framework has been used
to provide theoretical results for a number of household issues; for example, labour supply,
consumption and savings, household production, and intra-household allocation. As for
the empirical papers, the international evidence covers the majority of developed and
developing countries from all continents.
JEL Classification: D10, J22, Y10
Keywords: household, collective models, Pareto efficiency, sharing rule, labor supply, consumption
Corresponding author:José Alberto MolinaDepartment of Economics AnalysisFaculty of EconomicsGran Via 25005 ZaragozaSpain
E-mail: [email protected]
* This document was mainly written while Jose Alberto Molina was Visiting Professor at the Department of
Economics of Boston College (US), to which he would like to express his thanks for the hospitality and facilities
provided. We are very grateful to Pierre-André Chiappori for helpful suggestions. Comments are welcome.
2
The collective approach celebrates its thirtieth birthday. On this occasion, we present a bibliography that includes all the papers (or at least most of them) inspired by the seminal paper of Pierre-André Chiappori, the founder of the collective approach, “Rational Household Labor Supply”, published in 1988. The collective approach to household behavior arose from the hypothesis that (i) each individual in the household has specific preferences and (ii) the outcome of the decision process is Pareto efficient. In spite of important earlier contributions that already used Pareto efficiency as the basis of household behavior models (and which we have not included), the aforementioned paper and its sequel, “Collective Labor Supply and Welfare”, published in 1992, introduced original ideas that have opened up new areas of research. We can point out at least three important and original contributions of these two papers:
1. The Pareto efficiency hypothesis is theoretically justified. Efficiency is seen as a fundamental axiom, comparable to the classical axioms of consumer theory. It can be challenged, but it remains the benchmark hypothesis. It also replaces the axioms of the Nash solution used in prior models of household behavior. Consequently, the collective model can be seen as the “true” neoclassical model of household behavior, while the unitary model remains a holistic deviation.
2. Pareto efficiency has two important consequences: a. Testability: Like any other model of household behavior that is susceptible to challenge, the
unitary model must be testable from survey data (in Popper’s sense). The collective model actually generates restrictions on household behavior that are not satisfied by any other model. These restrictions are comparable to the Slutsky conditions in the unitary case.
b. Identifiability: In analogy with the unitary model, for which utility functions can be recovered up to a monotonic transformation, the structural components of the model must be recoverable from observable behavior (e.g., demand equations that are estimated from the usual data). Using the efficiency hypothesis, together with auxiliary hypotheses, it can be shown that individual utility functions and the sharing of resources can be recovered from observed behavior. Consequently, the intra-household distribution of resources can be studied by econometricians.
3. A new technique of proof is proposed. Identifiability and testability is proven, according to a new technique that will be applied in many other papers.
This bibliography also includes papers that are not directly inspired by the two aforementioned papers, but have benefitted from the new interest by the profession in intra-household bargaining, with these including tests of the multi-person income-pooling hypothesis and multi-utility models of household behavior that include equivalence-scale models. We have included not only published papers, but also a number of books, chapters of books, and a number of unpublished papers that are included in reputable working paper collections. We also restrict the bibliography to “neo-classical” economic literature, even if the idea behind collective models may have been burgeoning outside this limited domain of research. Finally, one of our objectives is also to point out original papers that have been overlooked by the profession.
Despite that we have attempted to be complete and exhaustive, we are conscious that this bibliography does not do justice to some important papers (e.g., on risk sharing, or marriage) that, although they focus on the multiplicity of individuals in the household, are far from the collective approach.
3
TABLE OF CONTRIBUTIONS RELATE TO COLLECTIVE MODELS (1988- OCTOBER 2018)
Year Authors Journal Theoretical/
Survey/Empirical Country Data/Years Keywords JEL Codes
1988 Chiappori Econome-
trica Theoretical NA NA
Labor Supply Intra-Household Nonparametric
NA
1989 Deaton Book NA NA NA Household
Surveys Microeconometric
NA
1989 Lommerud JOLE Theoretical NA NA Marital Contracts
Divorce Allocation of Time
NA
1990 Chiappori AES Theoretical NA NA Demand
Collective Good Pareto Efficiency
NA
1990 Haddad & Kanbur EJ Empirical Philippines 1984-5 Intra-Household
Inequality NA
1990 Kooreman & Kapteyn JHR Empirical Netherlands DLMS/1982 Two-Person
Games Labor Supply
NA
1990 McElroy JHR Theoretical NA NA Nash-Bargained
Household Decisions
NA
1990 Schultz JHR Empirical Thailand Socioeconomic
Survey/1981 Labor Supply
Fertility NA
1990 Thomas JHR Empirical Brazil Survey/1974-75 Intra-Household
Resource Allocation
NA
1990 Woolley PhD
Thesis NA NA NA
Family Decisions Non-Cooperation Intergenerational
NA
1992 Bourguignon & Chiappori
EER Survey NA NA Collective Models
Household Behavior
NA
4
1992 Chiappori JPE Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply
Altruism Welfare
NA
1992 Haddad & Kanbur EER Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Inequality NA
1992 Lloyd AEP Theoretical NA NA Rationality
Intra-Household NA
1992 Ott Book NA NA NA Intra-Household
Bargaining NA
1993 Haddad & Kanbur AES Empirical Philippines Household Survey Intra-Household
Nutritional Program
NA
1993 Bourguignon et al. AES Empirical France INSEE/1984-85 Intra-Household
Consumption Income Pooling
NA
1993 Lundberg & Pollak JPE Theoretical NA NA Separate Spheres Bargaining Model
Intra-Marriage NA
1993 Thomas AES Empirical Brazil ENDEF/1974-75 Intra-Household
Income Expenditures
NA
1994 Browning et al. JPE Empirical Canada FAMEX/
1978, 82,84, 1986
Intra-Household Income Outcomes
Efficiency NA
1994 Chiappori Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Collective Household
NA
1994 Haddad & Hoddinot WD Empirical Côte d’Ivore CILSS/1986-87 Intra-Household
Child Status Anthropometrics
NA
1994 Jerison RES Theoretical NA NA Optimality
Income Distribution
NA
1994 Kanbur & Haddad OEP Theoretical NA NA Cooperation Household Production
NA
1994 Kawaguchi AE Empirical Australia AIDS/1986 Household Labor
Supply NA
1994 Kooreman JAEcon Empirical Denmark NA Simultaneously
Non-Cooperation Labor Supply
NA
5
1994 Lundberg & Pollak AERP&P Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation
Bargaining Marriage
NA
1994 Thomas JHR Empirical US Brazil Ghana
NLS/1986 GLSS/1987-88
ENDEF/1974-75 1986
Intra-Househod Parental
Education Child Height
NA
1994 Thomas & Chen Working
Paper Empirical Taiwan PSID/1980
Intra-Household Income
Demand NA
1995 Alderman et al. WBRO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Preferences Policy Analysis
NA
1995 Browning RiE Empirical Canada FES/
1982-84-86-90-92
Intra-Household Savings
Retirement D13, D91
1995 Haddad et al. OBES Empirical Philippines 455 households Intra-Household
Inequality Welfare
NA
1995 Hoddinott & Haddad OBES Empirical Côte d’Ivoire Survey Female Income
Household Expenditures
NA
1995 Konrad & Lommerud SJE Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation Time Allocation
Public Good NA
1995 Phipps & Burton CJE Empirical Canada FES/1982, 1986,
1992
Poverty Intra-Household
Financial Resources
NA
1995 Phipps & Burton FE Empirical Seven countries LIS Intra-Household
Labor Supply Gender Power
NA
1995 Strauss & Thomas Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Human Resources Empirical Decisions
NA
1996 Apps & Rees JPubE Empirical Australia IDS/1985-86
Labor Supply Household
Production Intra-family Inequality
D11, D12, D13, J22
6
1996 Bradbury Working
Paper Empirical Australia HES/1988-89
Household Income Consumption
NA
1996 Doss WD Survey NA NA Intra-Household
Resource Allocation
NA
1996 Lundberg & Pollak JEP Survey NA NA Bargaining
Intra-Household Marriage
NA
1996 Phipps & Burton CPP Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Policy Makers Transfers Taxation
NA
1996 Udry JPE Empirical Burkina Faso ICRISAT/ 1981-1985
Gender Agricultural
Pareto Efficiency NA
1996 Wells & Maher Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Time Surplus Allocation
Intra-Marriage NA
1997 Apps & Rees JPE Theoretical NA NA Household Production
Labor Supply NA
1997 Agarwal FE Survey NA NA Bargaining Models
Gender Social Norms
NA
1997 Behrman Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Intra-Household Consensus Models
Non-Consensus NA
1997 Bruce & Lloyd Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Female-Headed Household Developing Countries
NA
1997 Carter & Katz Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Separate Spheres Gender
NA
1997 Chiappori JPE Theoretical NA NA
Household Production
Labor Supply Intra-Household
NA
1997 Chiuri & Simmons EJ Theoretical NA NA Decentralization Demand System
Public Goods NA
1997 Deaton Book NA NA NA Household Survey Microeconometric
Policy NA
7
1997 Dey Abbas Chapter
Book Empirical
Sub-Saharian Africa
NA Gender
Intra-Household Policy
NA
1997 Folbre Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Gender Coalitions Inequality
NA
1997 Fortin & Lacroix EJ Empirical Canada CCPH/1986
Labor Supply Income Pooling
Slutsky Restrictions
NA
1997 Gittelsohn & Mookherji Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Anthropological Methods
Intra-Household NA
1997 Guyer Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Endowments Anthropology
Whealth NA
1997 Harris-White Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Gender Nutrition
Intra-Household NA
1997 Hoddinott et al. Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Testing Models Intra-Household
NA
1997 Katz FE Survey NA NA
Gender Bargaining Theory
Household Production
NA
1997 Lundberg et al. JHR Empirical UK FES/1973-1990 Income-pooling Intra-Household
Experiment NA
1997 McElroy Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Policy Family Bargaining
Marriage NA
1997 Seaton AEL Empirical UK FES/1984 Labor Supply
Revealed Preference
NA
1998 Behrman & Rosenzweig Working
Paper Empirical US MTR/1994
In-Law Resources Transfers Bequests
NA
1998 Brett JPubE Theoretical NA NA Optimal Taxation
Tax Reform D10, D61, H21, H31
1998 Browning & Chiappori Econome-
trica Empirical Canada
FAMEX/1974, 1978, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1990, 1992
Efficiency Bargaining
Slutsky Matrix NA
8
1998 Fafchamps Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Efficiency Rural Households
NA
1998 Gray AER Empirical UA Census/1960-70-80
CPS/1968-79 PSID/1970-1980
Divorce-Laws Bargaining
Labor Supply NA
1998 Klassen JEH Survey NA NA Sex-Mortality Gender-Bias
Intra-Household NA
1998 Phipps & Burton Economica Empirical Canada FES/1992 Income Pooling Consumption Gender Power
NA
1999 Apps & Rees JPubE Theoretical NA NA Tax Reform
Domestic Production
NA
1999 Biswal CPP Empirical Canada FES/1986-92 Income-Pooling
Immigrants Married-Women
NA
1999 Bourguignon JOPE Theoretical NA NA Consumption
Intra-Household Cost of Children
D10, J13, J15
1999 Chiappori Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Risk Sharing
NA
1999 Chiappori & Ekeland Econome-
trica Theoretical NA NA
Aggregation Consumer Theory Market Demand
NA
1999 Gersbach & Haller Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Multi-Members Consumption
Equilibria NA
1999 Lundberg Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Retirement Bargaining Models
NA
1999 Lundberg & Rose Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Specialization
Marriage NA
1999 Snyder JPubE Theoretical NA NA
Pareto Optimality Public Goods
Revealed Preference
NA
1999 Tiefenthaler JOPE Empirical Brazil NSS/1989 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Income pooling
D1, J2
9
2000 Blundell & Robin Econome-
trica Theoretical NA NA
Consumer Separability
Price Aggreation NA
2000 Browning SJE Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Saving Consumption
D1, D7
2000 Chiuri Labour Empirical Italy SHIW/1993 Child Care
Female Labor Supply
D1, J2
2000 Chiuri RE Survey NA NA Consumption Labor Supply
Intra-Household D1, D7
2000 Dercon JPE Empirical Ethiopia NA Nutrition
Consumption Intra-Household
NA
2000 Donni PhD
Thesis NA NA NA
Collective Models Consumption
NA
2000 Hallberg Working
Paper Empirical Sweden STUS/ 1984-93
Time Use Unitary Model
NA
2000 Konrad & Lommerud CJE Theoretical NA NA Bargaining
Human Capital Non-Cooperation
D13, J24
2000 Maitra & Ray Mimeo Empirical South Africa
Pakistan NA
Intra-Household Labor
Income I32, I38, D12,C32
2000 Moreau EP Empirical France INSEE/1994-96 Labor Supply
Divorce Threat NA
2000 Pavoni Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Dynamic Decisions
Labor Supply NA
2000 Rubalcava & Thomas Working
Paper Empirical US PSID/1968-92
Aid to Families Dependent Children
NA
2000 Snyder SEJ Empirical US NLS/1969-1971
Bargaining Revealed
Preference Pareto Efficiency
D11, D12
2000 Sprumont JET Theoretical NA NA Collective Choices
Revealed Preference
C72, C92
2000 Strauss et al. JAE Survey NA NA Intra-Household
Theories Empirical
NA
10
2001 Aronsson et al JOPE Empirical Sweden HUS/1984-1993 Time Use
Home Production Intra-Household
D13, J22
2001 Barmby & Smith AE Empirical Denmark/UK DLS/1986 FES/1984
Labor Supply Pareto Behavior Intra-Household
NA
2001 Beblo Book NA NA NA Bargaining
Time Allocation NA
2001 Beegle et al. SFP Empirical Indonesia ILFS/1997-98 Women’s Power
Reproductive Decisions
NA
2001 Browning & Lechene Working
Paper Empirical Canada FAMEX/1969-92
Caring Income Pooling Intra-Household
NA
2001 Bustreel RevE Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation Time Allocation
D1, J22
2001 Chen & Woolley EJ Theoretical NA NA Two-Person Family
Bargaining Cournot-Nash
NA
2001 Dauphin & Fortin EL Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Polygamy Pareto Optimality
D11, D70
2001 Fong & Zhang JPE Theoretical NA NA Identification
Marriage Spousal Leisure
NA
2001 Gersbach & Haller RES Theoretical NA NA
General Equilibrium Intra-
Household Efficiency
NA
2001 Seaton AEL Empirical UK FES/1984
Labor Supply Bargaining Revealed
Preference
NA
2002 Angrist QJE Empirical US Census
IPMUS/1910-20-40
Sex Ratios Immigrants Experiment
NA
2002 Apps & Rees LE Empirical Australia AustraliaTUS/1992 Child Costs
Time Allocation Home Production
J13, J22, D13
11
2002 Attanasio & Lechene RED Empirical Mexico PROGRESA/
1998-2000
Income-pooling Intra-Household Gender Power
J12, D13, H31
2002 Chiappori et al. JPE Empirical US PSID/1989 Labor Supply
Marriage Divorce Children
NA
2002 Hallberg Ph.D. Thesis
NA NA NA Household Behavior Time Use
NA
2002 Koolwal & Ray Working
Paper Empirical Nepal NLSS
Female’s Share Wage Earnings
Welfare NA
2002 Ligon Working
Paper Empirical Bangladesh NA
Dynamic Pareto Efficiency Intra-Household
NA
2002 Lundberg Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Specialization
Policy NA
2002 Luo JBES Empirical Canada SFE/
1978, 1982, 84, 86
Preferences Heterogeneity
Quadratic PIGLOG
NA
2002 Moreau & Donni AES Empirical France ECHP/1994 Labor Supply
Taxation Divorce
NA
2002 Ray & Basu Working
Paper Empirical Nepal NLSS/1995
Balance of Power Child Labor
Woman’s Power NA
2002 Rubalcava et al. Working
Paper Empirical Mexico PROGRESA
Woman’s Power Consumption Time
Welfare NA
2002 Thomas et al. Mimeo Empirical Indonesia IFLS/1993-97 Relative Power
Intra-Household Child Health
NA
2002 Vermeulen JES Survey NA NA Collective Models Principles Results
NA
2002 Wirl & Feichtinger Economica Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation
Dynamic Intra-Household
NA
2003 Andreoni et al. JHR Empirical US Gallup
Organization/ 1992-94
Charitable Giving Bargaining
Relative Power NA
12
2003 Arias et al. Working
Paper Empirical Italy IHBS/1999
Sharing Rule Clothing
Equivalence Scales NA
2003 Blacklow & Ray ER Empirical Australia AHS/1975-1999 Sharing Rule
Intra-Household Demand System
NA
2003 Donni JPubE Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Income Tax
Corner Solutions H31, J22
2003 Duflo WBER Empirical South Africa SALDRU/1993 Grandparents Age Pension
Intra-Household H55, O15, I12, D13
2003 Fernandez-Val IE Empirical Spain ECHP/1994-97 Labor Suppy
Intra-Household Unitary/Collective
J22, D1
2003 Lakshmanasamy JSED Empirical India NA Unitary/Collective
Income Pooling Female’s Power
NA
2003 Lewbel JEcon Empirical US Consumer
Expenditure Survey
Equivalence Scales Consumer Demand
Bargaining K1, D1, J17, C30, I31
2003 Lich-Tyler Mimeo Empirical US PSID/1976-86 Intertemporal
Bargaining Euler Equations
D91, D19, J12
2003 Lundberg & Pollak REHO Theoretical NA NA Marriage Efficiency Bargaining
D10, J12, J61
2003 Lundberg et al. JPubE Empirical US PSID/1979-86,
1989-92
Consumption Married Couples
Retirement D1, D91, E21
2003 Maitra & Ray Mimeo Empirical Australia AHES/1998-99 Spousal Power
Expenditure Intra-Household
D13, C31
2003 Quisumbing & Maluccio OBES Empirical Bangladesh, SA
Ethiopia, Indonesia,
Various/1996-1998 Marriage
Intra-Household Bargaining Power
NA
2004 Adam et al. Chapter
Book Empirical Canada
Time Series/ 1960-96
Intra-Household Bargaining
Divorce D10, J12
2004 Beblo et al. AEQ Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Tax Reform
D11, D12, D13, D31, J12, J22
13
2004 Borelli & Perali Working
Paper Empirical Djibouti
African Society/ 1996
Intra-Household Sharing Rule Drug
Consumption NA
2004 Bradbury CESifo Empirical UK HES/1988-89, 93-94, 98-99
Intra-Household Consumption Experiment
J10, J12, I38
2004 Carvajal & Gonzalez JME Theoretical NA NA Nash Bargaining
Revealed Preferences
NA
2004 Clark et al. RevE Empirical UK BHPS/1997 Labor Supply Sharing Rule
Marriage Market C31, C71, D10, J22
2004 Lewel Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Equivalence Scales Household
Demand K1, D1, J17, C30, I31
2004 Lundberg & Ward-Batts Working
Paper Empirical US HRS/1992
Bargaining Spouses’ Control
Net Worth NA
2004 Maitra & Ray Chapter
Book Empirical South Africa NA
Household Composition Budget Share
NA
2004 Mazzocco AER Empirical US HRS/1992 Intertemporal Risk Sharing
HARA Preferences NA
2004 Michaud & Vermeulen LE Empirical US HRS/1992-2008 Intra-Household
Labor Supply Retirement
D13, H310, J22, J26
2004 Moehling JEH Empirical US BLSCLS/1917-19 Working Children
Clothing Expenditures
NA
2004 Peluso & Trannoy Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Lorenz Dominance Intra-Household
Inequality D10, D63, D31, D81
2004 Rapallini RPE Empirical Italy ICS/1999 Bargaining Power
Sharing Rule Consumption
D13, H31
2005 Aura JPubE Empirical US CPS1989 HRS
AHEAD
Nash-Bargaining Marriage Annuities
D1, J1
2005 Blundell et al. JPE Theoretical NA NA Public
Consumption Welfare
NA
14
2005 Bourguignon & Chiuri Working
Paper Empirical France
FranceTUS/ 1998-199
Women Home Production
Time Use D13, J22
2005 Chiappori AERAE
2005 Hourriez Mimeo Empirical France ECHP/1994-2001 Labor Supply
Non-Participation Intra-Household
D13, J22
2005 Iyigun Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Marriage Matching
Labor Supply C78, D61, D70
2005 Jia REHO Empirical Norway Statistics Norway/
1994-96
Labor Supply Retirement Bargaining
D10, J26
2005 Lundberg Working
Paper Empirical US NLSY79
Child Gender Labor Supply
Time Allocation J22, J12, J13, J16
2005 Maitra & Ray AEP Empirical Australia AHES1998-99 Simultaneous Expenditure
Bargaining Power NA
2005 Maitra & Ray Working
Paper Empirical Pakistan PIHS/1991
Expenditures Resource Pooling Intra-Household
I32, I38, D12, D32
2005 Strand JRU Theoretical NA NA Bargaining
Intertemporal Optimal Life
I12, G22, J17
2005 Vermeulen EmpE Empirical Netherlands DNBHS/1995-2003 Intra-Household
Bargaining Labor Suppy
D12, J22
2006 Alessie et al. Working
Paper Empirical
Ten European Countries
ECHP/2001 Consumption
Financial Satisfaction
D12, D13,I31
2006 Bargain et al. REHO Survey NA NA Labor Supply
Intra-Household Tax Reform
D11, D12, J22
2006 Bargain & Moreau AERAE Empirical France NA Labor Supply Tax Reform Simulations
NA
2006 Basu EJ Theoretical NA NA
Gender Balance of Power
Household Equilibrium
NA
15
2006 Bayudan AE Empirical Phillipines CLHNS/1984-1999 Wive’s Time Allocation
Intra-Household NA
2006 Beninger et al. REHO Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Tax Reform
D11, D12, J22
2006 Beninger &Laisney CESR Empirical France NA Labor Supply
Policy Simulations
NA
2006 Browning et al. REHO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Distribution Factors
D13
2006 Chiappori & Donni AERAE Survey NA NA Non-Unitary Cooperative
Non-Cooperative NA
2006 Chiappori & Ekeland JET Theoretical NA NA Demand Theory
Aggregation Group Behavior
D11, D13, C65
2006 Choo & Siow JPE Empirical US Census/
1971-72, 81-82
Marriage Market Non-Parametric
Matching NA
2006 Dauphin et al. AERAE Empirical UK FES/1982-93 Consumption
Testing Collective Model
NA
2006 Donni CJE Theoretical NA NA Demand Theory
Slutsky Symmetry Welfare
NA
2006 Donni AERAE Empirical US PSID/1990 Non-Cooperation
Labor Supply Nash
J22, D13, C79
2006 Fuwa et al. DE Empirical India NA
Child Labor Intra-Household
NGO Interventions
C81, D13, I21, I31, J16, J22, J24, O15
2006 Lancaster et al. Economica Empirical India NSS/1993-94 Endogeneity
Bargaining Power Expenditure
NA
2006 Mazzocco Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Public Consumption
Children D10, D91, H41
2006 McPeak & Doss AJAE Empirical Kenya Survey/1993-97 Household Production
Non-Cooperation NA
16
2006 Myck et al. REHO Empirical UK FRS/1998-99 Fiscal Reforms Labor Supply
Intra-Household D11, D12
2006 Rapoport et al. AERAE Empirical France EET-INSEE/
1998-99
Household Production
Sharing Rule NA
2006 Vermeulen JOPE Empirical Belgique SEP/1992-1997 Female
Labor Supply Tax Reform
D11, D12, J22
2006 Vermeulen et al. REHO Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Tax Reform
Non-Participation D11, D12, J22
2006 Vermeulen et al. AERAE Empirical Belgium EB-INS/
1996-97, 1997-98, 2000
Public Consumption
Intra-Household NA
2007 Apps & Rees Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Cooperation Welfare Function
Bargaining D10
2007 Aura Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Dynamic
Commitment Consumption
D1, D91, J12
2007 Bargain & Moreau Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Taxation Intra-Household
Simulations NA
2007 Beninger et al. JOPE Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Tax Reform
D11, D12, J22
2007 Blundell et al. RES Empirical UK FES/1978-2001 Labor Suppy
Heterogeneity Non-participation
NA
2007 Chau et al. ChER Empirical China USU-SSB/2002
Labor Supply Developing
country Patriarchalism
D13, J22, O12
2007 Cherchye et al. Econome-
trica Theoretical NA NA
Intra-Household Revealed
Preferences Nonparametric
NA
2007 Couprie EJ Empirical UK BHPS/1992-2000 Leisure Demand
Time Use Welfare
NA
17
2007 Daunfeldt & Hellstrom Labor Empirical Sweden HUS/1984-93 Time Allocation
Household Production
C24, D13, J22
2007 Donni EJ Empirical France INSEE/1984-85 Female
Labor Supply Intra-Household
NA
2007 Donni & Moreau JHR Empirical France INSEE/1999-2000 Labor supply Conditional
demand NA
2007 Iyigun & Walsh JDE Theoretical NA NA Gender Power Labor Supply
Bargaining J13, O11, O33, O40
2007 Iyigun & Walsh RES Theoretical NA NA
Marriage Market Spousal Powers
Assortative Matching
NA
2007 Lee EDCC Empirical South Korea KHPS/1993-98 Consumption
Spouses Power Dynamic
NA
2007 Lundberg & Pollak JEP Survey NA NA Family Economics American Families
NA
2007 Mazzocco RESt Empirical US CEX/1984-1995 Commitment Intertemporal
Intra-Household NA
2007 Rainer EER Theoretical NA NA Asset Division
Divorce Marital Contract
J12, K11, D78
2007 Trannoy & Peluso JET Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Inequality Sharing Rule
D13, D63, D31
2007 Xu Mimeo Survey NA NA Intra-Household
Bargaining Dynamics
NA
2008 Cherchye et al. JEcon Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-2003 Revealed
Preferences Programming
D11, D12, D14
2008 Cherchye & Vermeulen RESt Empirical Netherlands DNBHS/1995-2005 Labor Supply
Revealed Preferences
C13, D12, J22
2008 Chiappori & Oreffice JPE Theoretical NA NA Birth Control
Intra-Household Female Power
NA
18
2008 Dietrich AFE Empirical China CHNS/1991-93 Consumption
Demand System Bargaining
NA
2008 Donni JPubE Theoretical NA NA Labor supply Public goods
NA
2008 Donni Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Collective Models Household
NA
2008 Ermisch & Pronzato EJ Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2005 Intra-Household
Father’s Child Payments
NA
2008 Fafchamps Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Intra-Household Welfare
NA
2008 Kalugina et al. EP
2008 Lewbel & Penkakur JEcon Empirical Canada CFES/1990-92 Consumption
Demand System Bargaining
D12, D11, C30, C31, J12
2008 Mazzocco Mimeo Empirical US CEX/1982-95 Consumption Intertemporal Commitment
NA
2008 Mazzocco Mimeo Empirical US CEX/1982-98 Consumption Intertemporal Identification
NA
2008 Rasul JDE Empirical Malaysia MFLS/
1976-77, 1988-89
Fertility Bargaining
Commitment J12, J13, O12
2008 Silvennoinen Ph.D. Thesis
NA NA NA Intra-Household Time Allocation
NA
2008 Siow CJE Empirical China NA Marriage Matching
Labor Supply NA
2008 Van Klaveren et al REHO Empirical UK BHPS/2003 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Time Allocation
D12, D13, J22
2008 Ward-Batts JHR Empirical UK FES/1973-1983
(excluding 1977-79)
Income Pooling Intra-Household
Expenditure shares
NA
2008 Yoshida & Kim AE Empirical Japan 1996-97-98 Consumption Health Risk Income Risk
NA
19
2009 Allgood JPubET Theoretical NA NA Tax Policy Household Production
NA
2009 Ashraf AER Empirical Philippines Authors’data/
2004
Experiments Information
Communication D13, D14, J12, J16, O15
2009 Bobonis JPE Empirical Mexico PROGRESA Intra-Household
Female Consumption
NA
2009 Bonke &Browning FS Empirical Denmark DHES/1999-2005 Intra-Household
Expenditure D13, C81, C42
2009 Bonke & Browning REHO Empirical Denmark ECHP/1994 Relative Income
Well-being Intra-Household
D13, D60, D63, I31
2009 Bonke & Browing EJ Empirical Denmark DHES/1999-2005 Expenditure
Children NA
2009 Bourguignon et al. RES Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Efficiency Identification
NA
2009 Cherchye et al. Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Revealed Preference Demand
NA
2009 Cherchye et al. JPE Empirical Russia RMLS Revealed
Preference Intra-Household
2009 Chiappori & Ekeland Econome-
trica Theoretical NA NA
Non-parametric Identification Labor Supply
NA
2009 Crespo IE Empirical Spain ECHP/1994-1999 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Unitary/Collective
J22, D13
2009 Deb JET Theoretical NA NA
Externalities Revealed
Preference Consumption
C14, C72, D11, D59
2009 Donni RESt Empirical US CES/1980-2003 Public Goods Conditional
Demands NA
2009 Kalugina et al. RIW Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-1998 Inequality
Identification Sharing Rule
NA
2009 Kalugina et al. REHO Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-2003 Intra-Household
Inequality D13, I31, C3, P36
20
2009 Kato & Matsumoto TRB Empirical Japan Time Surveys/2003 Intra-Household Children Gender
Spouses Job NA
2009 Lundberg et al. REHO Empirical US NLSY79 Children Parents
Investments NA
2009 Sahn & Younger HE Empirical Seven countries LSMS BMI
Intra-Household NA
2009 Seitz JLE Empirical US NLSY79/1979-1994 Racial Differences
Marriage Dynamic
NA
2009 Trannoy & Peluso JID Theoretical NA NA Poverty
Intra-Household D31, D63, I32
2009 Zhang et al. TRB Empirical Japan NA Intra-Household
Heterogeneity Bayesian
NA
2010 Amuedo-Dorantes et al. Working
Paper Empirical Denmark DHS/1999-2005
Income Pooling Household Production
D13, D14, J12
2010 Apps & Rees REHO Empirical Australia ATUS/2005-06 ABS/2003-04
Labor Supply Taxation
Time Allocation D13, D91, H31, J2
2010 Attanasio & Lechene Working
Paper Empirical Mexico Surveys/1998-99
Consumption Cash Transfers
QUAIDS NA
2010 Bargain et al. ESR Empirical Ireland IHBS/2005
Demand Sharing Rule
Costs of Children
D11, D12, C30, D36, I31, J12
2010 Bloemen EJ Empirical Netherlands SEP/1990-2001 Labor Supply
Non-participation Sharing Rule
NA
2010 Browning et al. EJ Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation
Public Good Game Separate Spheres
NA
2010 Cherchye et al. JET Theoretical NA NA Consumption
Revealed Preferences
D11, D12, D13, C14
2010 Chiappori JET Theoretical NA NA Demand
Transferable Utility
C78, D11, D12
21
2010 Couprie et al. JPubE Empirical France FFES/2000 Expenditures
Inequality Sharing Functions
D63, D13, C14
2010 Hendy & Sofer Working
Paper Empirical Egypt ELMPS/2006
Labor Supply Females
Distribution Factors D11, D12, J22
2010 Linciano & Simmons Working
Paper Empirical UK BHPS/1992
Labor Supply Work Travel
NA
2010 Prabhu WD Empirical India Survey/2005-06 Intra-Household
Willingness To Pay
NA
2010 Yoon & Goulias TL Empirical US CSTS/2000-01 Time Allocation Intra-Household
Life Cycle NA
2011 Apps & Rees Chapter
Book Theoretical NA NA
Time Use Inequality Taxation
NA
2011 Basu & Ray Chapter
Book Empirical Nepal NLSS/1995
Woman’s Power Child Labor
NA
2011 Cherchye et al. RES Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-95-96-
98-00-01-02-03
Revealed Preferences
Consumption Sharing Rule
D11, D12, D13, C14
2011 Cherchye et al. Chapter
Book Empirical Russia RMLS
Consumption Revealed
Preferences D11, D12, D13, C14
2011 Cherchye et al. Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Revealed Preference
Tests NA
2011 Cherchye et al. EJ Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-95-96-
98-00-01-02-03
Revealed Preference
Consumption NA
2011 Chiappori REHO Theoretical NA NA
Labor Supply Consumption
Goods Identification
NA
2011 Chiappori & Ekeland ARE Theoretical NA NA Aggregation
Demand Pareto-Efficient
NA
2011 Dauphin et al. EJ Empirical UK FES/1982-93 Children under 16
QUAIDS Intra-Household
NA
22
2011 Donni & Chiappori Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Non-Unitary Models
NA
2011 Donni & Ponthieux TGS Survey NA NA Unitary/Collective
Models NA
2011 Gersbach & Haller JET Theoretical NA NA
General Equilibrium Household Formation
NA
2011 Lacroix & Radtchenko JOPE Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-2004 Sharing Rule
Intra-Household Economic Crisis
D1, J22, C5
2011 Lechene & Preston JET Theoretical NA NA Nash Equilibrium Intra-Household
Slutsky Symmetry D11, C72
2011 Lise & Seitz RES Empirical UK FES/1968-2001 Consumption
Marital Sorting Equivalence Scales
D12, D13, D31, J22
2011 de Palma et al. TD Empirical Germany Sessions/2005 Balance of Power
Experiments Intra-Household
NA
2011 Rapoport et al. JOPE Empirical France FrenchTUS/1998 Intra-Household
Home Production Labor Supply
D13, J22
2011 Talla Nobibon et al. CE Theoretical NA NA Revealed
Preference Graphs Colors
NA
2011 Zamora JOPE Empirical Spain EPF/1990-91 Intra-Household
Sharing Rule Engel Curve
D11, J22
2012 Bargain & Donni EER Empirical France INSEE/2000 Demand systems Cost of children
Indifference scales D11, D12, D36, I31, J12
2012 Browning & Gortz SJE Empirical Denmark DanishTUS/2001 Home Production Intra-Household
Time Use Money C3, D1, J1, J2
2012 Bruyneel et al. REHO Empirical NA 102 Undergr.
Students
Revealed Preferences
Experimental Data C14, C92, D11, D12, D13
2012 Cherchye et al. AER Empirical Netherlands LISS Panel Labor Supply
Household Production
D12, J12, J22
23
2012 Cherchye et al. EER Empirical Netherlands DCES/1978-2004 Well-being
Poverty Elderly Consumption
D11, D12, D13, D63, I31
2012 Chiappori et al. RES Theoretical NA NA
Theoretical restrictions Game
Theory Nash solution
NA
2012 Del Boca & Flinn JEcon Empirical US PSID/2005
Time Allocation Trigger Strategy
Household Proudction
C79, D19, J22
2012 Donni & Matteazzi AES Empirical US ATUS/2003-2006 Labor Supply
Home Production Identification
D13, J21, J22
2012 Haan & Myck AE Empirical Poland PHBS/2005 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Work Incentives
J22, I38, D13
2012 Lundberg Working
Paper Empirical Germany GSOEP
Personality Marriage Divorce
J22
2012 Mazzocco & Saini AER Empirical India ICRISAT/1975-85 Efficient
Risk Sharing J12, D86, G22, O12, O18,
R23 Z13
2012 Menon et al. EL Empirical Italy CISF/2009 Expenditure
Children Sharing Rule
C2,D1, D6, D7
2012 Sinha AsER Empirical India HDP/1994 Labor Supply
Bargaining Health
J22, C31, I15, D13
2012 Van Klaveren & Ghysels JLR Empirical Belgium FFCS/2004-05 Labor Supply
Child Care D12, D13, J22
2013 Bargain & Moreau JFEI Empirical France FHBS/2001
Labor Supply Bargaining Tax-benefit
Reform
NA
2013 Browning et al. RES Empirical Canada FAMEX/1974-1992 Consumption
Economies of Scale Bargaining Power
D11, D12, C30, I31, D63, J12
2013 Cherchye et al. ET Empirical NA 102 Underg.
Students
Consumption Revealed
Preferences Public/Private
D11, D12, D13, C14
2013 Cherchye et al. EJ Empirical Belguim 116 Economic
Students Nash Bargaining
Consumption NA
24
2013 Chiappori et al. Mimeo Empirical France Census/1999
Location Bargaining
Transportation Costs
NA
2013 Choo & Seitz Chapter
Book Empirical US Census/2000
Labor Supply Intra-Household
Transfers NA
2013 Doss WBRO Survey NA NA Intra-Household
Bargaining Development
O12, O20, R2
2013 Dunbar et al. AER Empirical Malawi HIS/2005-2011
Children Resources
Consumption Child Poverty
I31, I32, J12, J13, O12, O15
2013 Fujii & Ishikawa REHO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household
Bargaining Separability
C78, D01, D11
2013 Fujii & Ishikawa OBES Empirical Japan JPSC/1994-2002 Childbirth
Expenditure Intra-Household
NA
2013 Himmelweit et al. JMF Survey NA NA Sharing Resources
Gender Inequality
NA
2013 Loken et al. Dem Empirical Norway Administrative
Data/2006
Marriage Gender Residential
Location NA
2013 Martinez EDCC Empirical Chile CASEN/1990-92-
94-96-2000 Intra-Household
Bargaining Power NA
2013 Mazzocco et al. Mimeo Empirical US PSID/1968-96 Labor Supply
Wealth Dynamics Marriage
NA
2013 Ortigueira & Siassi JMonE Empirical US NA Labor Supply Risk Sharing
Unemployment NA
2013 Picard et al. IJTE Survey NA NA Transportation
Urban Economics Pareto Efficiency
NA
2014 Adams et al. AER Empirical Spain ECPF/1985-1997
Intertemporal Decisions, Revealed
Preferences
E24, F13, F16
25
2014 D’Aspremont & Dos Santos
ET Theoretical NA NA Cooperative and Noncooperative Nash Solution
C11, C72, H41
2014 Attanasio & Lechene JPE Empirical Mexico PROGRESA/
1998-1999
Consumption Cash Transfer Distribution
Factors
NA
2014 Bargain & Donni Economica Theoretical NA NA Consumption
Optimal Taxation Intra-Household
NA
2014 Bargain et al. JDE Empirical Côte d’Ivoire CILSS/2002 Intra-Household
Expenditures Child Poverty
D11, D12, D36, I31, J12
2014 Bertochhi et al. JEBO Empirical Italy SHIW/1989-2010 Intra-Household
Gender Financial Choices
J12, D13, E21, G11
2014 Boone et al. IZAJOLE Empirical US CEX/1998-2007 Consumption Labor Supply
Non-Cooperation D11, D12, D13
2014 Browning et al. Book NA NA NA Family Economics NA
2014 Del Boca & Flinn JET Empirical US PSID/2007 Marriage Market
Matching Time Allocation
D13, J12, J22
2014 Donni MSS Theoretical NA NA Bargaining
Risk Durable Goods
NA
2014 Inoa et al. Working
Paper Empirical France Paris
Location Commuting
Intra-Household R21, R31,C35
2014 Kebede et al. JAE Empirical Ethiopia 1,200 Couples Efficiency
Experiment Spouses’ Power
D13, C93, D03
2014 Lise & Yamada Working
Paper Empirical Japan JPSC/1993-2007
Consumption Leisure
Dynamic Commitment
D12, D13, J22
2014 Mangiavacchi & Rapallini
BER Empirical Italy ITUS/2002
Household Production Inequality Time Use
D13, J16, J22, 052
2014 Mazzocco et al. AERP&P Empirical US PSID/1968-96 Labor Supply
Dynamics Gender
NA
26
2014 Menon et al. AJAE Empirical Italy Survey/1997 Travel-Cost Model Non-Market Good Demand System
D13, H41,Q26, Q51
2014 de Palma et al. Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Transportation Negotiation Efficiency
NA
2014 Zhang JOPE Empirical US SIPP/2004-08 Labor Supply
Shocks Income Instability
D12, D13, D81, J22
2015 Beblo et al. AES Empirical France Germany 156 Couples/2010 Experiment Inequality
Social Norms C71,C91, C92, D13
2015 Bonke REHO Empirical Denmark DHES/1994-2004 Income Pooling Consumption
Marriage D13, D31, C82
2015 Caiumi EmpE Empirical Italy SHIW/1995 Cost of Children Demand System
Sharing Rule D12, D13, J22
2015 Cherchye et al Econome-
trica Empirical US PSID/1999-2009
Demand Sharing Rule
Revealed Preference
NA
2015 Chiappori & Meghir Chapter
Book Survey NA NA
Inequality Sharing Rule
NA
2015 Chaippori & Naidoo Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Engel Curves
Non-Cooperation Working-Leser
NA
2015 Chiappori et al. JDE Theoretical NA NA Becker-Coase Consumption Marital Status
NA
2015 Couprie & Ferrant AES Empirical UK UKTUS/2000 Welfare
Time Use Bargaining Power
D10, D13, D63, J12, J22
2015 Eckstein & Lifshitz IER Empirical US PSID/1983-93 Labor Supply
Married Women Household Games
NA
2015 Galichon & Salanié Working
Paper Theoretical NA NA
Matching Marriage
Hedonic Prices C78, D61, C13
2015 Haddad EmpE Empirical Iran HES&ASY/2008 Intra-Household
Gender Ratio Divorce Rate
D13, J22
27
2015 Mizushima & Futagami JE Theoretical NA NA Public Goods
Household Games Time Allocation
D13, J24
2015 Naidoo Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Testing Pareto Public Goods
Non-Parametric D13, D7
2015 de Palma et al. ETrans Empirical France Paris Time Decision
Congestion Delay Costs
D11, D70, R41
2015 Smeulders et al. JME Theoretical NA NA
Weak Axiom Revealed
Preference Consumption
NA
2015 Smeulders et al. ETB Theoretical NA NA
Transitivity Weak Axiom
Revealed Preference
D11, D12, D13, C14
2015 Sofer & Thibout ES Empirical France FTUS/
1998-99 2010-11
Domestic Production Time Use Gender
D13, J16, J22
2015 Voena AER Empirical US PSID&NLSYM/196
8-93 & 1967-99
Divorce Laws Intertemporal
Well-being D13, D14, D91, J12, J16, K36
2015 Yilmazer & Lich REHO Empirical US HRS/1992-2006 Portfolio Choice
Risky Assets Bargaining Power
NA
2016 Blau & Goodstein LE Empirical US HRS/1992-1998-
2004
Commitment Inheritance
Labor Supply NA
2016 Browning et al. Mimeo
2016 Cherchye et al. Working
Paper Empirical US PSID/2013
Marriage Economies Scale
Revealed Preference
D11, D12, D13, J12
2016 Chiappori EJ Theoretical NA NA Indifference
Scales NA
2016 Cochard et al. REHO Empirical France 100 Couples/2008 Experiment Cooperation
Efficiency Equal C72, C91, D13
28
2016 Gutierrez Mimeo Empirical Mexico MxFLS/2002, 2005-
06, 2009-10
Sharing Model Deaton-Paxson Consumption
D13, J12, O15
2016 Lundberg et al. JEP Survey NA NA Inequality Marriage
Childbearing NA
2016 Radtchenko JFEI Empirical Russia RLMS/1995-1998 Inequality
Labor Supply Sharing Rule
NA
2016 Rodriguez WD Empirical NA UNICEF/
2000, 2010-11
Inequality Children
Well-being NA
2016 Talla Nobibon et al. OP Theoretical NA NA
Revealed Preference
Consumption Programming
NA
2016 Tommasi & Wolf Working
Paper Empirical Mexico PROGRESA
Demand System Sharing Rule
Cash Transfers D13, D11,D12,C31, I32
2017 Beblo & Beninger REHO Empirical Germany 95 couples Intra-Household
Consumption Experiment
C71, C91, C92, D12, D13, J16
2017 Bruyneel et al. QE Empirical NA 100 Children
Children’s Consumption
Revealed Preferences
D11, D12, C14
2017 Cherchye et al. AER Empirical Denmark LISS/2012
Marriage Consumption
Revealed Preference
D60, D63, H21, H23, I38
2017 Chiappori & Mazzocco JEL Survey NA NA Static
Intertemporal Intra-Household
D11, D13, D15, I38
2017 Chiappori et al. AER Empirical US Census/2008-14 Consumption
Children’s Welfare Matching
D12, J12, J13, J15, J24
2017 Chiappori et al. EJ Empirical Canada GSS/2001 Alimony Rights
Cohabiting Matching
NA
2017 Bütikofer & Gerfin REHO Empirical Switzerland LWS/2000-2008 Sharing Rule
Equivalence Scale Subjective Data
D12, C21, D19
29
2017 Couprie et al. Working
Paper Empirical France
81 Couples/ 2012-13
Experiment Stereotypes
Gender Roles D13, J16, J22, C91,C92
2017 Dunbar et al. Mimeo Empirical Malawi HIS/2005-2011 Costs of Children
Sharing Rule Demand Systems
D13, D11, D12, C31, I32
2017 Goussé et al. Econome-
trica Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2008
Assortative Matching Gender
Social Norms
NA
2017 Goussé et al. LE Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2008 Labor Supply Assortative Matching
C78, D83, J12, J22
2017 Lyssiotou EmpE Empirical UK FES/1991-93 Child Benefits Labor Supply Public Goods
D12, I38, J16, J18, J22, H31
2017 Matteazzi et al. AEPP Empirical Italy ISMEA/1995 Farm-Household
Household Production
D11, D12, D13
2017 Porter JDE Empirical China CLHLS/1998-2009 Caring
Elderly Parents Sex Ratios
NA
2017 Stieglitz et al. EvHD Empirical Bolivia 53 Couples Experiment
Sexual Division Labor
NA
2018 Armand et al. Working
Paper Empirical Macedonia MLSP/2010-11
Gender Expenditure
D12, D13, E21, O12
2018 Bargain et al. Mimeo Empirical UK FES/1978 Costs of Children
QUAIDS Sharing Resources
NA
2018 Campaña et al. Working
Paper Empirical Mexico Colombia TUS/2009 2012
Labor Supply Intra-Household
Bargaining Power D10 J22
2018 Chavas et al. TE Empirical Italy HBS/2007 Consumption
Welfare Inequality
D11, D12, D13
2018 Chiappori REHO Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply
Samuelson Randomized
D11, D12, D13
2018 Chiappori et al. REHO Empirical Russia RLMS/1995-2013 Divorce
Marriage Matching
J12, D1
30
2018 Cochard et al. EE Empirical France 238 Individuals/
2010-16
Experiment Time Allocation Work Division
D13, C99, J16
2018 Cosaert & Demuynck RESt Empirical US CEX/1994-2007 Non-Parametric Welfare Demand
Heterogeneity NA
2018 Dauphin et al. REHO Empirical Burkina Faso Survey CECI/1999 Consumption
QUAIDS Polygamy
D1, D7, J12
2018 Flinn et al. EER Empirical Australia HILDA/2001-16 Gender Wage Differentials
Time Allocations D1, J12, J16, J22, J31, J71
2018 Manzini & Mariotti JET Theoretical NA NA Stochastic Choice Attraction Effect Similarity Effect
D03, D01
2018 Menon et al. REHO Empirical Italy HES/2002-03-04 Demand System
Sharing Rule Alcohol
C31, C34, C51, D12, D13
2018 Molina et al. Working
Paper Empirical US PSID/1997-15
Intertemporal Labor Supply
D15, J22
2018 Molina et al. Working
Paper Empirical US ATUS/2003-15
Welfare Inequality
Labor Supply D15, J22
2018 Tommasi & Wolf EL Theoretical NA NA Demand System
Sharing Rule Shrinkage
D13, D11, D12, C31, I32
Forthcoming d’Aspremont et al. ET Theoretical NA NA Semi-Cooperation
Revealed Preference
D11, C72, H41
Forthcoming Bargain & Martinoty JOPE Empirical Spain EPF/2006-11 Mancession
Intra-Household Unemployment
NA
Forthcoming Bloemen JBES Empirical Netherlands SEP/1990-2002 Labor Supply
Intra-Household Taxation
NA
Forthcoming Donni & Matteazzi JAEcon Empirical US PSID/2009 Labor Supply
Non-Participation NA
Forthcoming Galichon et al. JPE Theoretical NA NA Matching
Transferable Utility Heterogeneity
NA
Forthcoming Molina et al. REHO Empirical Spain 55 three-generation families, 165 indiv./
2017
Intra-Household Intergenerational
Experiment D03, D64, D70
31
Short-terms of Journals: AERAE= Actualité Économique: Revue d’Analyse Économique AER = American Economic Review AERP&P = American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings AJAE = American Journal of Agricultural Economics AES = Annals of Economics and Statistics ARE = Annual Review of Economics AEPP = Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy AE = Applied Economics AEL = Applied Economics Letters AEQ = Applied Economics Quarterly AFE = Applied Financial Economics AsER = Asian Economic Review AEP = Australian Economic Papers BER = Bulletin of Economic Research CESR = Cahiers d’Économie et Sociologie Rurales CJE = Canadian Journal of Economics CPP = Canadian Public Policy CESifo = CESifo Economic Studies ChER = China Economics Review CE = Computational Economics Dem = Demography DE = Developing Economies EJ = Economic Journal ER = Economic Record ET = Economic Theory ETB = Economic Theory Bulletin EDCC = Economic Development and Cultural Change ESR = Economic and Social Review EHB = Economics and Human Behaviors EL = Economics Letters ETrans= Economics of Transportation EP = Economie & Prévision EmpE = Empirical Economics EER = European Economic Review EvHB = Evolution and Human Behavior ExE = Experimental Economics FE = Feminist Economics FS = Fiscal Studies HE = Health Economics IER = International Economic Review IJTE = International Journal of Transport Economics IZADP = Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Papers IZAJLE = Institute of Labor Economics Journal of Labor Economics IE = Investigaciones Económicas JAE = Journal of African Economies JAEcon = Journal of Applied Econometrics JBES = Journal of Business and Economic Statistics JDE = Journal of Demographic Economics JDevE = Journal of Development Economics
32
JDevS = Journal of Development Studies JEBO = Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization JEH = Journal of Economic History JEL = Journal of Economic Literature JEP = Journal of Economic Perspectives JES = Journal of Economic Surveys JET = Journal of Economic Theory JE = Journal of Economics JEcon = Journal of Econometrics JFEI = Journal of Family and Economic Issues JHR = Journal of Human Resources JMF = Journal of Marriage and Family JME = Journal of Mathematical Economics JMonE= Journal of Monetary Economics JOLE = Journal of Labor Economics JLR= Journal of Labor Research JPE = Journal of Political Economy JOPE = Journal of Population Economics JPubE = Journal of Public Economics JPubET = Journal of Public Economy Theory JRU = Journal of Risk and Uncertainty JSED = Journal of Social and Economic Development LE = Labour Economics OR = Operations Research OBES = Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics OEP = Oxford Economic Papers QE = Quantitative Economics QJE = Quarterly Journal of Economics REI = Research on Economic Inequality RE = Research in Economics RED = Review of Economic Dynamics RES = Review of Economic Studies REHO = Review of Economics of the Household RESt = Review of Economics and Statistics RIW = Review of Income and Wealth RevE = Revue Économique RiE = Ricerche Economiche RPE = Rivista di Politica Economica SJE = Scandinavian Journal of Economics SEJ = Southern Economic Journal SFP = Studies in Family Planning TD = Theory and Decision TE = Theoretical Economics TL = Transportation Letters TGS = Travail, Genre et Sociétés TRB = Transportation Research Part B: Methodological WB = The World Bank WBER = World Bank Economic Review WBRO = World Bank Research Observer WD = World Development
33
REFERENCES
Adam, C., Hoddinott, J., Ligon, E. (2004). Dynamic intra-household bargaining, matrimonial
property law, and suicide in Canada. In: Quisumbing, A. (ed.). Household Decisions,
Gender, and Development. Washington: DC: IFPRI.
Adams A., Cherchye, L., De Rock B. and Verriest E. (2014). Consume now or later? Time
inconsistency, collective choice and revealed preference. American Economic Review 104:
4147-4183.
Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist
Economics 3: 1-51.
Alessie, R., Crossley, T., and Hildebrand, V. (2006). Estimating a collective household model with
survey data on financial satisfaction. WP 06/19. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Alderman, H., Chiappori, P.A., Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., and Kanbur, R. (1995). Unitary versus
collective models of the household: is it time to shift the burden of the proof. World Bank
Research Observer 10: 1-19.
Allgood, S. (2009). The collective household, household production and efficiency of marginal
reforms. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 11: 749-771.
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Bonke, J., and Grossbard, S. (2010). Income pooling and household division
of labor: evidence from Danish couples. IZA DP No. 5418. IZA Institute of Labor
Economics.
Andreoni J., Brown, E., and Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples. Who decides
and why does it matter? Journal of Human Resources 38: 111-133.
Angrist, J. (2002). How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s
second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 997-1038.
Apps, R., and Rees, R. (1996). Labour supply, household production and intra-family welfare
distribution. Journal of Public Economics 60: 199-219.
Apps, R., and Rees, R. (1997). Collective labor supply and household production. Journal of
Political Economy 105: 178-190.
Apps, P., and Rees R. (1999). On the taxation of trade within and between households. Journal of
Public Economics 73: 241-263.
Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2002). Household production, full consumption and the costs of children.
Labour Economics 8: 621-648.
34
Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2007). Cooperative household models. IZA DP No. 3127. IZA Institute of
Labor Economics.
Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2010). Family labor supply, taxation and saving in an imperfect capital
market. Review of Economics of the Household 8: 297-323.
Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2011). Household time use, inequality and taxation. In: Molina, A. (ed.).
Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Arias, C., Atella, V., Castagnini, R., and Perali, F. (2003). Estimation of the sharing rule between
adults and children and related equivalence scales within a collective consumption
framework. In: Dagum C. and Ferrari, G. (eds). Household Behavior, Equivalence Scales,
Welfare and Poverty. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Armand, A., Attanasio, O., Carneiro, P. and Lechene, V. (2018). The effect of gender-targeted
conditional cash transfers on household expenditures: Evidence from a randomized
experiment. CEMMAP working paper CWP 33/18. University College of London.
Aronsson, T., Daunfeldt, S.O. and Wikstrom, M. (2001). Estimating intrahousehold allocation in a
collective model with household production. Journal of Population Economics 14: 569-
584.
Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in
the Philippines. American Economic Review 99: 1245-77.
d’Aspremont, C., and Dos Santos Ferreira, R. (2014). Household behavior and individual
autonomy: An extended Lindahl mechanism. Economic Theory 55: 643–664.
d’Aspremont, C., and Dos Santos Ferreira, R. (Forthcoming). Enlarging the collective model of
household behavior: A revealed preference analysis. Economic Theory.
Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2002). Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of
Economic Dynamics 5: 720-748.
Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2010). Conditional cash transfers, women and the demand for food.
WP 10/17. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2014). Efficient responses to targeted cash transfers. Journal of
Political Economy 122: 178-222.
Aura, S. (2005). Does the balance of power within a family matter? The case of the Retirement
Equity Act. Journal of Public Economics 89: 1699–1717.
Aura, S. (2007). Uncommitted couples: some efficiency and policy implications of marital
bargaining. Mimeo. University of Missouri.
Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F., Lechene,
V., Moreau, N., Myck, M., Ruiz-Castillo, J. and Vermeulen, F. (2006). Does the
representation of household behavior matter for welfare analysis of tax-benefit policies?
An introduction. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 99-111.
35
Bargain, O., Donni, O. and Gbakou, M. (2010). The measurement of child costs: Evidence from
Ireland. Economic and Social Review 41: 1-20.
Bargain, O., and Donni, O. (2012). Expenditure on children: A Rothbarth-type method consistent
with scale economies and parents’ bargaining. European Economic Review 56: 792-813.
Bargain, O., and Donni, O. (2014). Optimal commodity taxation and redistribution within
households. Economica 81: 48-62.
Bargain, O., Donni, O., and Kwenda, P. (2014). Intrahousehold Distribution and Child Poverty:
Theory and Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Economics 107: 262-276.
Bargain, O., Donni, O., and Hentati, I. (2018). Resource sharing in households with children: A
generalized model and empirical evidence from the UK. Mimeo. Université de Cergy-
Pontoise.
Bargain, O., and Martinoty, L. (Forthcoming). Crisis at home: Mancession-induced change in
intrahousehold distribution. Journal of Population Economics.
Bargain, O., and Moreau, N. (2006). Effets d’une réforme fiscale sur l’offre de travail des ménages
dans un cadre collectif simulé. Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82:
207-246
Bargain, O. and Moreau, N. (2007). Does taxation affect intra-household distribution? A Simulation
Approach. In: Y. Amiel and J. Bishop (eds). Research on Economic Inequality 14: 317-344.
Bargain, O., and Moreau, N. (2013). The impact of tax-benefit reforms on labor supply in a
simulated Nash-bargaining framework. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 34: 77-86.
Barmby, T., and Smith, N. (2001). Household labour supply in Britain and Denmark: some
interpretations using a model of Pareto optimal behaviour. Applied Economics 33: 1109-
1116.
Basu, K. (2006). Gender and say: a model of household behaviour with endogenously determined
balance of power. The Economic Journal 116: 558-580.
Basu, K., and Ray, R. (2011). The collective model of the household and an unexpected implication
for child labor: hypothesis and an empirical test. In: Dhar A. (ed.). Some Contemporary
Issues in Development and Growth Economics. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
Bayudan, C. (2006). Wives’ time allocation and intrahousehold power: evidence from the
Philippines. Applied Economics 38: 789-804.
Beblo, M. (2001). Bargaining over time allocation: Economic modeling and econometric
investigation of time use within families. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Beblo, M., and Beninger, D. (2017). Do husbands and wives pool their incomes? A couple
experiment. Review of Economics of the Household 15: 779–805.
36
Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Cochard, F., Couprie, H., and Hopfensitz, A. (2015). Equality and
efficiency trade-off within French and German couples: a comparative experimental
study. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 117-118: 233-252.
Beblo, M., Beninger, D., and Laisney, F. (2004). Family tax splitting: a microsimulation of its
potential labour supply and intra-household welfare effects in Germany. Applied
Economics Quarterly 50: 231-248.
Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., and Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining power within couples and use of
prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning 32: 130-146.
Behrman, J. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In: Rosenzweig, M., and Stark, O.,
Handbook of Population and Family Economics 1A: 125-187, Elsevier.
Behrman, J., and Rosenzweig, M. (1998). In-law resources and distribution within marriage. PARC
Working Paper Series WPS 98-18
Beninger, D., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F., Lechene,
V., Longobardi, E., Moreau, N., Myck, M., Ruiz-Castillo, J., and F. Vermeulen (2006).
Evaluating the move to a linear tax system in Germany and other European countries.
Review of Economics of the Household 4: 159-180.
Beninger, D., and Laisney, F. (2006). On the performance of unitary models of household labor
supply estimated on “collective” data with taxation. Cahiers d’Économie et Sociologie
Rurales 81: 5-36.
Beninger, D., Laisney, F., and Beblo, M. (2007). Welfare analysis of a tax reform for Germany: a
comparison of the unitary and collective models of household labour spppy. Journal of
Population Economics 20: 869-893.
Bertochhi, G., Brunetti, M., and Torricelli C. (2014). Who holds the purse strings within the
household? The determinants of intra-family decision making. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization 101: 65-86.
Biswal, U. (1999). Testing the family “common preference” model for immigrant and non-
immigrant women’s labour supply. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques 25
(Supplement: Women in the Canadian Labour Market): S95-S114.
Blacklow, P., and Ray, R. (2003). Intra-household resource allocation, consumer preferences and
commodity tax reforms: Australian Evidence. Economic Record 79: 425-433.
Blau, D.M., and Goodstein, R.M. (2016). Commitment in the household: evidence from the effect of
inheritances on the labor supply of older married couples. Labour Economics 42: 123-137.
Bloemen, H.G. (2010). An empirical model of collective household labour supply with non-
participation. The Economic Journal 120: 183-214.
Bloemen, H.G. (forthcoming). Collective labor supply, taxes, and intrahousehold allocation: An
empirical approach, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.
37
Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.A., and Meghir, C. (2005). Collective labor supply with children. Journal
of Political Economy 113: 1277-1306.
Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.A., Magnac, T., and Meghir, C. (2007). Collective labour supply:
heterogeneity and non-participation. Review of Economic Studies 74: 417-445.
Blundell, R., and Robin, J.M. (2000). Latent separability: Grouping goods without weak
separability. Econometrica 68: 53-84
Bobonis, G. (2009). Is the allocation of resources within the household efficient? New evidence
from a randomized experiment. Journal of Political Economy 117 (3): 453–503.
Bonke, J. (2015). Pooling of income and sharing of consumption within households. Review of
Economics of the Household 13: 73-93.
Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). The allocation of expenditures within the household: A new
survey. Fiscal Studies 30: 461-481.
Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). The distribution of financial well-being and income within the
household. Review of Economics of the Household 7: 31-42.
Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). Spending on children: direct survey evidence. The Economic
Journal 121: F123-F143.
Bonke, J., and Uldall-Poulsen, H. (2007). Why do families actually pool their income? Evidence
from Denmark. Review of Economics of the Household 5: 113–128.
Boone, J., van der Wiel, K., van Soest, A.. and Vermeulen F. (2014). Kinky choices, dictators and
split might: a non-cooperative model for household consumption and labor supply. IZA
Journal of Labor Economics 3: 1-19.
Borelli S., and Perali F. (2004). Drug Consumption and Intra-Household Distribution of Resources:
The Case of Qat in an African Society. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds) Household
Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics.
Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Bouis, H.E., and Peña, C.L. (1997). Inequality in the intrafamily distribution of food: the dilemma
of defining an individual’s “fair share”. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H.
(eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and
policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Bourguignon, F. (1999). The cost of children: may the collective approach to household behavior
help? Journal of Population Economics 12: 503-521.
Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (2009). Efficient intra-household allocations
and distribution factors: implications and identification. Review of Economic Studies 76:
503-528. Publication of the older working paper (which contained different results):
Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (1995). The collective approach to
household behavior. WP-95-04. DELTA.
38
Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (1993). Intra-household
allocation of consumption: a model and some evidence from French data. Annales
d’Économie et de Statistique 29: 237-156.
Bourguignon, F., and Chiappori, P.A. (1992). Collective models of household behavior: an
introduction. European Economic Review 36: 355-364.
Bourguignon, F., and Chiuri, M.C. (2005). Labor market time and home production: a new test for
collective models of intra-household allocation. WP No. 131. Center for Economic Studies
and Finance.
Bradbury, B. (1996). Household income sharing, joint consumption and the expenditure patterns of
Australian retired couples and single people. SPRC Disc. Paper 66, University of New
South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
Bradbury, B. (2004). Consumption and the within-household income distribution: outcomes from
an Australian “natural experiment”, CESifo Economic Studies 50: 501–540
Brett, C. (1998). Tax reform and family decision-making. Journal of Public Economics 70: 425-440.
Browning, M. (1995). Saving and the intra-household distribution of income: an empirical
investigation. Ricerche Economiche 48: 277-292.
Browning, M. (2000). The saving behaviour of a two person household. Scandinavian Journal of
Economics 102: 235-251.
Browning, M., Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (1994). Income and outcomes: a
structural model of intra-household allocation. Journal of Political Economy 102: 1067-
1096.
Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (1998). Efficient intra-household allocations: a general
characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241-1278.
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (2006). Collective and unitary models: a
clarification. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 5-14.
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (2010). Distributional Effects in Household
Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling. The Economic Journal: 120: 786-799.
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lewbel, A. (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale,
adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. The Review of Economic
Studies 80: 1267-1303.
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A. and Weiss, Y. (2014). Family economics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Browning M., Donni, O., and Gørtz, M. (2016). Do you have time to take a walk together? Private
and joint leisure within the household. Mimeo. Oxford University.
39
Browning, M., and Gørtz, M. (2012). Spending time and money within the household. The
Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114: 681-704.
Browning, M., and Lechene, V. (2001). Caring and sharing: tests between alternative models of
intra-household allocation. Discussion Paper No 01-07. University of Copenhagen.
Bruce, J., and Lloyd, C.B. (1997). Finding the ties that bind: beyond headship and household. In:
Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in
developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
Bruyneel, S., Cherchye, L., Cosaert, S., De Rock, B., and Dewitte, S. (2017). Measuring the
willingness-to-pay for others’ consumption: An application to joint decisions of children.
Quantitative Economics 8: 1037-1082.
Bruyneel, S., Cherchye, L., and De Rock, B. (2012). Collective consumption models with restricted
bargaining weights: an empirical assessment based on experimental data. Review of
Economics of the Household 10 : 395-421.
Bustreel, A. (2001). La rationalité de la non-spécialisation dans les ménages. Une rupture avec la
théorie beckérienne. Revue Économique 52: 1157-1183.
Bütikofer, A., and Gerfin, M. (2017). The economies of scale of living together and how they are
shared: estimates based on a collective household model. Review of Economics of the
Household 15: 433-453.
Caiumi, A., and Perali, F. (2015). Who Bears the Full Cost of Children? Evidence from a collective
demand system. Empirical Economics 49: 33-64.
Campaña, J.C., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., and Molina, J.A. (2018). Efficient Labor Suppy for Latin
Families: Is the Intra-household Bargaining Power Relevant? IZA Discussion Papers
11695, Institute of Labor Economics.
Carter, M.R., and Katz, E.G. (1997). Separate spheres and the conjugal contract: understanding the
impact of gender-biased development. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H.
(eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and
policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Carvajal, A., and González, N. (2004). On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution. Journal of
Mathematical Economics 50, 177-186.
Chau, T.W., Li, H., Liu, P.W., and Zhang, J. (2007). Testing the collective model of household labor
supply: evidence from China. China Economic Review 18: 389-402.
Chavas, J.-P., Menon, M, Pagani, E., and Perali, F. (2018). Collective household welfare and intra-
household inequality. Theoretical Economics 13: 667-696.
Chen, Z., and Woolley, F. (2001). A Cournot-Nash model of family decision making. The Economic
Journal 111: 722–748.
40
Cherchye, L., Crawford, I., De Rock B., and Vermeulen, F. (2009). The revealed preference
approach to demand. In: Slottje, D. (ed.). Quantifying Consumer Preferences: Estimating
Demand Systems. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Lewbel, A., and Vermeulen, F. (2015). Sharing rule identification for
general collective consumption models. Econometrica 83: 2001-2041.
Cherchye, L., De Rock B., and Platino, V. (2013). Private versus public consumption within groups:
testing the nature of goods from aggregate data. Economic Theory 54: 485-500.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Sabbe J., and Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric tests of collectively
rational consumption behavior: an integer programming procedure. Journal of
Econometrics 147: 258-265.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Surana, K., and Vermeulen, F. (2016). Marital matching, economies of
scale and intra-household allocations. IZA DP No. 10242. IZA Institute of Labor
Economics.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2007). The collective model of household
consumption: a non-parametric characterization. Econometrica 75: 553-574.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2009). Opening the black box of intra-household
decision-making; theory and non-parametric empirical tests of general collective
consumption models. Journal of Political Economy 117: 1074-1104.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen F. (2010). An Afriat theorem for the collective model of
household consumption. Journal of Economic Theory 145: 1142–1163.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2011). The revealed preference approach to
collective consumption behaviour: testing and sharing rule recovery. Review of Economic
Studies 78: 176-198.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2011). Collective household consumption behavior:
Revealed preference analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics 4: 225-312.
Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2012). Economic well-being and poverty among the
elderly: an analysis based on a collective consumption model. European Economic
Review 56: 985-1000.
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2012). Married with children. A collective labor
supply model with detailed time use and intrahousehold expenditure information.
American Economic Review 102: 3377-3405
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Vermeulen, F., and Verriest, E. (2011). Revealed preference tests for
collective behavior. In: Molina, J.A. (ed.). Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer
Verlag.
41
Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2011). Revealed preference analysis of
noncooperative household consumption. The Economic Journal 121: 1073–1096.
Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2013). Nash bargained consumption decisions: a
revealed preference analysis. The Economic Journal 123: 195-235.
Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2017). Household consumption when
the marriage is stable. American Economic Review 107: 1507–1534.
Cherchye, L., and Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric analysis of household labor supply:
goodness-of-fit and power of the unitary and the collective model. Review of Economics
and Statistics 90: 267-274.
Chiappori, P.A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56 : 63-89.
Chiappori, P.A. (1990). La fonction de demande agrégée en biens collectifs : théorie et application.
Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques 19 : 1990, 27-42.
Chiappori, P.A. (1992). Collective labour supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100:
437-467.
Chiappori, P.A. (1994). The collective approach to household behavior. In: Blundell, R., Preston I.,
and Walker, J. (eds). The measurement of household welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Chiappori, P.A. (1997). Introducing household production in collective models of labor supply.
Journal of Political Economy 105: 191-209.
Chiappori, P.A. (1997). Collective models of household behavior : the sharing rule approach. In:
Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in
developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
Chiappori, P.A. (1999). Labor supply and efficient risk sharing. Mimeo. University of Chicago.
Chiappori, P.A. (2005). Modèle collectif et analyse de bien-être. Actualité Économique : Revue
d’Analyse Économique 81 (3) : 405-419.
Chiappori, P.A. (2010). Testable implications of transferable utility. Journal of Economic Theory
145: 1302-1317.
Chiappori, P.A. (2011). Collective labor supply with many consumption goods. Review of
Economics of the Household 9: 207-220.
Chiappori, P.A. (2016). Equivalence versus indifference scales. The Economic Journal 126: 523-545.
Chiappori, P.A. (2018). Randomized household labor supply. Review of Economics of the
Household (Special issue in honor of Angus Deaton) 16: 171-188.
Chiappori, P.A., Bundell, R., and Meghir, C. (2005) Collective labour supply with children. Journal
of Political Economy 113(6): 1277-1306.
42
Chiappori, P.A. and Donni, O. (2006). Les modèles non-unitaires de comportement du ménage : un
survol de la littérature. Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 9-52.
Chiappori, P.A., Donni, O., and Komunjer, I. (2012). Learning from a piece of pie. Review of
Economic Studies 79: 162-195.
Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (1999). Aggregation and market demand: An exterior
differential calculus viewpoint. Econometrica 67: 1435-58
Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2006). The microeconomics of group behavior: General
characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 130: 1-26.
Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2009). The microeconomics of efficient group behavior:
identification. Econometrica 77: 763-799.
Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2009). The economics and mathematics of aggregation.
Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics 5: 1-151. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.
Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2011). New developments in aggregation economics. Annual
Review of Economics 3: 631-668.
Chiappori, P.A., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2002). Marriage market, divorce legislation, and
household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy 110: 37-72.
Chiappori, P.A. and Kim, J.H. (2018). A note on identifying heterogeneous sharing rules.
Quantitative Economics, 8: 201-218.
Chiappori, P.A. and Mazzocco, M. (2017). Static and intertemporal household decisions. Journal of
Economic Literature 55: 985-1045.
Chiappori, P.A., and Meghir, C. (2015). Intrahousehold inequality. In: Atkinson A.B., and
Bourguignon F. (eds). Handbook of Economic Inequality 2: 1369-1418.
Chiappori, P.A., Iyigun, M., Lafortune, J., and Weiss, Y. (2016). Changing the rules midway: the
impact of granting alimony rights on existing and newly-formed partnerships. Economic
Journal 127: 1874-1905.
Chiappori, P.A., Iyigun, M., and Weiss, Y. (2015). The Becker-Coase Theorem Reconsidered,
Journal of Demographic Economics 81(2): 157-77.
Chiappori, P.A., and Naidoo, J. (2015). Noncooperative Engel Curves: A Characterization. Mimeo.
Columbia University.
Chiappori, P.A., and Oreffice, S. (2008). Birth control and female empowerment: An equilibrium
analysis. Journal of Political Economy 116: 113-140.
Chiappori, P.A., de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Inoa, I.A. (2013). Couple residential location and
spouses workplaces. Mimeo. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
Chiappori, P.A., Radtchenko, N., and Salanié, B. (2018). Divorce and the Duality of Marital Payoff.
Review of Economics of the Household 16: 833-858.
43
Chiappori, P.A., Salanié B., and Weiss, Y. (2017). Partner Choice, Investment in Children, and the
Marital College Premium. American Economic Review 107: 2109-67.
Chiuri, M.C. (2000). Quality and Demand of Child Care and Female Labour Supply in Italy.
Labour 14: 97-118.
Chiuri, M.C. (2000). Individual decisions and household demand for consumption and leisure.
Research in Economics 54: 277-324.
Chiuri, M.C., and Simmons, P.J. (1997). Universal decentralization: a demand system for collective
and unitary models with household public goods. The Economic Journal 107: 372-389.
Choo, E., and Siow, A. (2006). Who marries whom and why. Journal of Political Economy, 114:
175-201.
Choo, E., and Seitz, S. (2013). The collective marriage matching model: Identification, estimation,
and testing. In: Choo E. and Shum, M. (eds). Structural Econometric Models (Advances in
Econometrics, Volume 31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Clark, A., Couprie, H., and Sofer C. (2004). La modélisation collective de l’offre de travail : mise en
perspective et application aux données britanniques. Revue Économique 55: 767-790.
Cochard, F., Couprie, H. and Hopfensitz, A. (2016). Do spouses cooperate? An experimental
investigation. Review of Economics of the Household 14: 1-26.
Cochard, F., Couprie, H. and Hopfensitz, A. (2018). What if women earned more than their
spouse? An experimental investigation of work division in the couple. Experimental
Economics 21: 50-71.
Cosaert, S., and Demuynck, T. (2018). Nonparametric welfare and demand analysis with
unobserved individual heterogeneity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100: 349-
361.
Couprie, H. (2007). Time allocation within the family: welfare implications of life in a couple. The
Economic Journal 117: 287-305.
Couprie, H., Cudeville, E., and Sofer, C. (2017). Efficiency versus stereotypes: an experiment upon
domestic production. Working Paper THEMA No 2015-06. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
Couprie, H., and Ferrant, G. (2015). Welfare comparisons, economies of scales and equivalence
scale in time use. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 117-118: 185-210.
Couprie, H., Peluso, E., and Trannoy, A. (2010). Is power more evenly balanced in poor
households? Journal of Public Economics 7-8: 493-507.
Crespo, L. (2009). Estimation and testing of household labour supply models: evidence from Spain.
Investigaciones Económicas 33: 303-335.
Daunfeldt, S.O., and Hellstrom, J. (2007). Intra-household allocation of time to household
production activities: Evidence from Swedish household data. Labour 21 : 189-207.
44
Dauphin A., El Lahga, A.R., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2006). Choix de consommation des
ménages en présence de plusieurs décideurs. Actualité Économique: Revue d’Analyse
Économique 82 (1-2) : 87-118.
Dauphin, A., El Lahga, A.R., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2011). Are children decision-makers within
the household? The Economic Journal 121: 871-903
Dauphin, A., and Fortin, B. (2001) A test of collective rationality for multi-person households.
Economics Letters 71: 211-216.
Dauphin, A., Fortin, B. and Lacroix, G (2018). Is consumption efficiency within households
falsifiable? Review of Economics of the Household 16: 737-766.
Deaton, A. (1989). Looking for boy-girl discrimination in household expenditure data. World Bank
Economic Review 3: 1-15.
Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys : a microeconometric approach to
development policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Deb, R. (2009). A testable model of consumption with externalities, Journal of Economic Theory
144: 1804-1816.
Del Boca, D., and Flinn, C. (2012). Endogenous household interaction, Journal of Econometrics 166,
49-65.
Del Boca, D., and Flinn, C. (2014). Household behavior and the marriage market, Journal of
Economic Theory 150, 515-550.
Dercon, S., and Krishnan, P. (2000). In sickness and in health: Risk sharing within households in
rural Ethiopia. Journal of Political Economy 108: 688-727.
Dey Abbas, J. (1997). Gender asymmetries in intrahousehold resource allocations in Sub-Saharan
Africa: some policy implications for land and labor productivity. In: Haddad, L.,
Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing
countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
Dietrich, J. (2008). Testing unitary and bargaining models of Chinese household food
consumption. Applied Financial Economics, 18: 397-410.
Donni O. (2000). Essais sur les modèles collectifs de comportement du ménage. Ph. D. Thesis.
Paris : École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Donni, O. (2003). Collective household labor supply: non-participation and income taxation.
Journal of Public Economics 87: 1179-1198.
Donni, O. (2006). Collective consumption and welfare. Canadian Journal of Economics 39 : 124-144.
Donni, O. (2006). Les modèles non-coopératifs d’offre de travail : théorie et évidence. Actualité
Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 181-206.
45
Donni, O. (2007). Collective female labour supply: theory and application. The Economic Journal
117 : 94-119.
Donni, O. (2007). Choix collectif des heures travaillées, consommation publique et équilibre de
Lindahl. Revue Économique 58: 535-543.
Donni, O. (2008). Labor supply, home production and welfare comparisons. Journal of Public
Economics 92: 1720-1737.
Donni, O. (2008). Collective models of the household. In: Blume, L. and Durlauf, S. (ed.). The New
Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.
Donni, O. (2009). A simple approach to investigate intrahousehold allocation of private and public
goods. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 : 617-628.
Donni, O. (2014). Overinvestment in marriage-specific capital. Mathematical Social Sciences 67: 34-
43.
Donni, O., and Chiappori, P.A. (2011). Non-unitary models of household behavior: a survey of the
literature. In: Molina, J.A. (ed.). Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Donni, O., and Matteazzi, E. (2012). On the importance of household production in collective
models: evidence from U.S. data. Annals of Economics and Statistics 105-106: 99-126.
Donni, O., and Matteazzi, E. (Forthcoming). Collective decisions, household production, and labor
force participation, Journal of Applied Econometrics.
Donni, O., and Moreau, N. (2007). Collective labor supply: a single-equation model and some
evidence from French data. The Journal of Human Resources 42 (1) : 214-246.
Donni, O., and Ponthieux, S. (2011). Approches collectives du ménage : du modèle unitaire aux
décisions collectives. Travail, Genre et Sociétés 26: 1-18.
Doss, C. (1996). Testing among models of intrahousehold resource allocation. World Development
24: 1597-1609.
Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World
Bank Research Observer 28: 52-78.
Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: old age pension and intra-household
allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17: 1-25.
Dunbar, G., Lewbel, A., and Pendakur, K. (2013). Children’s resources in collective households:
identification, estimation and an application to child poverty in Malawi. American
Economic Review 103: 438-471.
Dunbar, G., Lewbel, A., and Pendakur, K. (2017). Identification of random resource shares in
collective households without preference similarity restrictions. Mimeo. Boston College.
Eckstein, Z., and Lifshitz, O. (2015). Household interaction and the labor supply of married
women. International Economic Review, 56: 427-455.
46
Ermisch, J., and Pronzato, C. (2008). Intra-household allocation of resources: inferences from non-
resident fathers’ child support payments. The Economic Journal 118: 347-362.
Fafchamps, M. (1998). Efficiency in intrahousehold resource allocation. FCND discussion papers
55, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Fafchamps, M. (2008). Intrahousehold welfare. In: Blume, L., and Durlauf, S. (ed.). The New
Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.
Fernández-Val, I. (2003). Household labor supply: evidence for Spain. Investigaciones Económicas
27: 239-275.
Flinn, C., Todd, P., and Zhang, W. (2018). Personality traits, intra-household allocation and the
gender wage gap. European Economic Review 109:191-220.
Folbre, N. (1997). Gender coalitions: extrafamily influences on intrafamily inequality. In: Haddad,
L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in
developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
Fong, Y., and Zhang, J. (2001). The identification of unobservable independent and spousal leisure.
Journal of Political Economy 109: 191-202.
Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (1977). A test of the unitary and collective models of household labour
supply. The Economic Journal 107: 933-955.
Fujii, T., and Ishikawa, R. (2013). A note on separability and intra-household resource allocation in
a collective household model. Review of Economics of the Household 11: 143.
Fujii, T., and Ishikawa, R. (2013). How does childbirth alter intrahousehold resource allocation?
Evidence from Japan. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75: 362-387.
Fuwa, N. , Ito, S. , Kubo, K. , Kurosaki, T., and Sawada, Y. (2006). Introduction to a study of
intrahousehold allocation and gender discrimination in rural Andhra Pradesh India. The
Developing Economies, 44: 375-397.
Galichon, A., and Salanié, B. (2015). Cupid’s Invisible Hand: Social Surplus and Identification in
Matching Models. Mimeo. Columbia University.
Galichon, A., Kominers, S., and Weber, S. (Forthcoming). Costly Concessions: An Empirical
Framework for Matching with Imperfectly Transferable Utility. Journal of Political
Economy.
Gersbach, H., and Haller H. (1999). Allocation among multi-member households: issues, cores and
equilibria. In: Alkan, A., Aliprantis, C.D., and Yannelis, N.C. (eds). Current Trends in
Economics. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 8. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Gersbach, H., and Haller, H. (2001). Collective decisions and competitive markets. Review of
Economic Studies 68: 628-642.
47
Gersbach, H., and Haller, H. (2011). Groups, collective decisions and markets. Journal of
Economic Theory 146: 275–299
Gittelsohn, J., and Mookherji, S. (1997). The application of anthropological methods to the study of
intrahousehold resource allocation. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds).
Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy.
Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Goussé, M., Jacquemet, N., and Robin, J.M. (2017). Marriage, labor supply, and home production.
Econometrica 85: 1873-1919.
Goussé, M., Jacquemet, N., and Robin, J.M. (2017). Household labor supply and the marriage
market in the UK, 1991-2008, Labour Economics 46, 131-149
Gray, J.S. (1998). Divorce-law changes, household bargaining, and married women’s labor Supply.
American Economic Review 88: 628-642.
Gutierrez, F. (2016). A sharing model of the household: Explaining the Deaton-Paxson paradox
and contesting the collective model. Mimeo. Vanderbilt University.
Gutierrez, F., and Moro, A. (2017). Household bargaining power, preferences for children and
household consumption. Mimeo. Vanderbilt University.
Guyer, J.I. (1997). The anthropology of wealth and the economics of intrahousehold allocation. In:
Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in
developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
Haan, P., and Myck, M. (2012). Multi-family households in a labour supply model: a calibration
method with application to Poland. Applied Economics 44: 2907-2919
Haddad, G.K. (2015). Gender ratio, divorce rate, and intra-household collective decision proves:
evidence from Iranian urban households labor supply with non-participation. Empirical
Economics 48: 1365-1394.
Haddad, L., and Hoddinott, J. (1994). Women’s income and boy-girl anthropometric status in the
Côte d’Ivore. World Development 22: 543-553.
Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1990). How serious is the neglect of intra-household inequality. The
Economic Journal 100: 866-881.
Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1992). Intrahousehold inequality and the theory of targeting.
European Economic Review 36: 372-378.
Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1993). The value of intrahousehold survey data for age-based
nutritional targeting. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique 29: 65–81.
Haddad, L., Kanbur, R., and Bouis, H. (1995). Intrahousehold inequality at different welfare levels:
energy intake and energy expenditure data from the Philippines. Oxford Bulletin of
Economics and Statistics 57 (3): 389–409.
48
Hallberg, D. (2000). Does time-use data support the unitary model? A test using Swedish Time-use
data from 1984 and 1993. Working Paper Series 2000:14, Uppsala University, Department
of Economics.
Hallberg, D. (2002). Essays on household behavior and time-use. Ph.D. thesis. Uppsala University.
Harris-White, B. (1997). Gender bias in intrahousehold nutrition in South Africa: unpacking
households and the policy process. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds).
Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy.
Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Hendy, R., and Sofer, C. (2010). A collective model of female labor supply: Do distribution factors
matter in the Egyptian case? WP No. 2010.35. Centre d’Économie de la Sorbonne.
Himmelweit, S., Santos, C., Sevilla, A., and Sofer, C. (2013). Sharing of resources within the family
and the economics of household decision making. Journal of Marriage and Family 75: 625-
639.
Hoddinott, J., Alderman, H. and Haddad, L. (1997). Testing competing models of intrahousehold
allocation. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource
allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins
University Press.
Hoddinott, J. and Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures?
Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57: 77-96
Hourriez, J.M. (2005). Estimation of a collective model of labor supply with female
nonparticipation. Mimeo. INSEE.
Inoa, I., Picard, N., and de Palma, A. (2014). Intra-household decision models of residential and job
location. THEMA Working Papers 2014-05. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
Iyigun, M. (2005). Bargaining and specialization in marriage. IZA DP No. 1744. IZA Institute of
Labor Economics.
Iyigun, M., and Walsh, R.P. (2007). Endogenous gender power, household labor supply, and the
quantity-quality tradeoff. Journal of Development Economics 82:1, 138-155.
Iyigun, M., and Walsh, R.P. (2007). Building the family nest: pre-marital investments, marriage
markets and spousal allocations. Review of Economic Studies 74 (2): 507-35.
Jerison, M. (1994). Optimal income distribution rules and representative consumers, The Review of
Economic Studies 61, 739–771.
Jia, Z. (2005). Labor supply of retiring couples and heterogeneity in household decision-making
structure, Review of Economics of the Household 3: 215.
Kanbur, R., and Haddad, L. (1994). Are better off households more unequal or less unequal?
Oxford Economic Papers 46: 445-458.
49
Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N. and Sofer, C. (2008). Une analyse du partage intrafamilial du revenu
à partir de données subjectives, Economie & Prévision 186: 101-116.
Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N., and Sofer, C. (2009) How do spouses share their full income?
Identification of the sharing rule using self-reported income. Review of Income and
Wealth 55: 360-391.
Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N. and Sofer, C. (2009) Intra-household inequality in transitional Russia.
Review of Economics of the Household 7:447-471.
Kato, H., and Matsumoto, M. (2009). Intra-household interaction in a nuclear family: A utility-
maximizing approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43: 191-203.
Katz, E. (1997). The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics 3: 25-46
Kawaguchi, A. (1994). Testing neoclassical and non-neoclassical models of household labour
supply. Applied Economics, 26: 9-19
Kebede, B., Tarazona, M., Munro, A., and Verschoor, A. (2014). Intra-household efficiency: An
experimental study from Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies 23: 105–150.
Klassen, S. (1998). Marriage, bargaining, and intrahousehold resource alocation: Excess female
mortality among adults during early German development, 1740-1860. Journal of
Economic History 58 : 432-467.
Konrad, K.A., and Lommerud, K.E. (1995). Family policy with non-cooperative families.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97 : 581-601.
Konrad, K.A., and Lommerud, K.E. (2000). The bargaining family revisited. Canadian Journal of
Economics 33: 471-486.
Koolwal, G., and Ray, R. (2002). Estimating the endogenously determined intrahousehold balance
of power and its impact on expenditure pattern: Evidence from Nepal. World Bank Policy
Research Working Paper No. 2814. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Kooreman, P. (1994). Estimation of econometric models of some discrete games. Journal of Applied
Econometrics, 9 : 255-268.
Kooreman, P., and Kapteyn, A. (1990). On the empirical implementation of some game theoretic
models of household labor supply. Journal of Human Resources, 25 : 584-598.
Lacroix, G., and Radtchenko, N. (2011). The changing intra-household resource allocation in
Russia. Journal of Population Economics 24: 85-106.
Lakshmanasamy, T. (2003). Testing the unitary and Nash bargaining household models in India.
Journal of Social and Economic Development 5: 197-217
Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., and Ray, R. (2006). Endogenous intra-household balance of power and its
impact on expenditure patterns: Evidence from India. Economica 73: 435-460.
50
Lechene, V., and Preston, I. (2011). Non cooperative household demand. Journal of Economic
Theory 146: 504–527.
Lee, J. (2007). Marriage, the sharing rule, and pocket money: The case of South Korea, Economic
Development and Cultural Change 55: 557-581.
Lewbel, A. (2003). Calculating compensation in cases of wrongful death. Journal of Econometrics
113: 115-128.
Lewbel A. (2004). Equivalence scales based on collective household models. In: Dagum C., and
Ferrari, G. (eds). Household Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty.
Contributions to Statistics. Heidelberg: Physica.
Lewbel, A., and Penkakur, K. (2008). Estimating collective household models with Engel curves.
Journal of Econometrics 147: 350-358.
Lich-Tyler, S. (2003). Negotiations and love songs: the dynamic of bargained household decisions.
Mimeo. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2003 American Economic
Association Meeting.
Ligon, E. (2002). Dynamic bargaining in households (with an application to Bangladesh). CUDARE
Working Papers 972. University of California at Berkeley.
Linciano, N., and Simmons, P. (2010). Estimation of alternative models of female labour supply
with fixed travel costs. Discussion Papers 10/10, University of York.
Lise, J., and Seitz, S. (2011). Consumption inequality and intra-household allocations. Review of
Economic Studies 78: 328-355.
Lise, J., and Yamada, K. (2014). Household sharing and commitment: evidence from panel data on
individual expenditures and time use. IFS Working Paper W14/0. Institute of Fiscal
Studies.
Lloyd, P. J. (1992). Individual and collective rationality in the household. Australian Economic
Papers 31: 127-145.
Løken, K., Lundberg, S., and Lommerud, K.-J. (2013). Your Place or Mine? On the Location
Decisions of Married Couples. Demography 50: 285-310.
Lommerud, K.-E. (1989). Marital division of labor with risk of divorce: the role of ‘voice’
enforcement contracts. Journal of Labor Economics 7: 113–127.
Lundberg, S. (1999). Family bargaining and retirement behavior. In: Aaron, H., Behavioral
dimensions of retirement economics. Brookings Institution Press.
Lundberg, S. (2002). Limits to specialization: family policy and economic efficiency. Mimeo.
University of Washington.
Lundberg, S. (2005). The division of labor by new parents: Does child gender matter? IZA WP No
1787. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
51
Lundberg, S. (2012). Personality and Marital Surplus. IZA Journal of Labor Economics 1:3.
Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal
of Political Economy 101: 988–1010. Reprinted in:
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R.A. (1997). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage
market. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource
allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins
University Press.
Lundberg, S., and Pollak, R. (1994). Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American
Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 84: 132-137.
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic
Perspectives 10: 139-158. Reprinted in:
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1997). Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage. In: Persson, I.
and Jonung, C. Economics of the Family and Family Policies: A Selection of Papers from
the 15th Arne Ryde Symposium. New York: Routledge.
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (2003). Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household
1: 153-167.
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (2007). The American family and family economics. Journal of
Economic Perspectives 21: 3-26.
Lundberg, R., Pollak, R., and Stearns, J. (2016). Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage,
cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (2): 79-102.
Lundberg, S., Romich, J., and Tsang, K.P. (2009). Decision-making by Children, Review of
Economics of the Household 7: 1-30.
Lundberg, S., and Rose, E. (1999). The determinants of specialization within marriage. Mimeo.
University of Washington.
Lundberg, S., Startz, R., and Stillman, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: A marital
bargaining approach. Journal of Public Economics 87: 1199-1218.
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R.A., and Wales, T.J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources?
Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32: 463-
480.
Lundberg, S., and Ward-Batts, J. (2004). Saving for retirement: Household bargaining and
household net worth. Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics and
Finance Research Paper No. 2004-03.
Luo, G.Y. (2002). Collective-decision making and heterogeneity in tastes. Journal of Business and
Economics Statistics 20: 213-226.
52
Lyssiotou, P. (2017). The impact of targeting policy on spouses’ demand for public goods, labor
supplies and sharing rule. Empirical Economics 53: 853-878.
Maitra, P., and Ray, R. (2000). Intra-household resource allocation and their impact on expenditure
patterns: Comparative evidence from South Africa and Pakistan. Mimeo. Monash
University.
Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2003). On a new test of the collective household model: Evidence from
Australia. Mimeo. Monash University.
Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2004). Analysis of resource inflows and their impact on household
behaviour: Evidence from South Africa. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds) Household
Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics.
Heidelberg: Physica.
Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2005). The impact of intra-household balance of power on expenditure
pattern: The Australian evidence. Australian Economic Paper 44: 15-29.
Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2005). An integrated test of the unitary household model: Evidence from
Pakistan. ABERU Discussion Paper 7, 2005.
Mangiavacchi, L., and Rapallini, C. (2014). Self-reported economic condition and home production:
Intra-household allocation in Italy. Bulletin of Economic Research 66: 279-304.
Manzini, P. and Mariotti, M. (2018). Dual random utility maximisation, Journal of Economic
Theory 177: 162-182.
Martínez, C. (2013). Intrahousehold allocation and bargaining Power: Evidence from Chile,
Economic Development and Cultural Change 61: 577-605.
Matteazzi, E., Menon, M., and Perali, F. (2017). The collective farm household model: Policy and
welfare simulations. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 39: 111–153.
Mazzocco, M. (2004). Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. The American Economic
Review 94: 1169-1182.
Mazzocco, M. (2006). Parents' preferences for expenditure on children when at least one parent
works and preferences are non-separable. CCPR Population Working Papers 2006.
University of California at Los Angeles.
Mazzocco, M. (2007). Household intertemporal behavior: a collective characterization and a test of
commitment. Review of Economic Studies 74: 857-895.
Mazzocco, M. (2008). Intertemporal behavior and household structure. Mimeo. University of
California at Los Angeles.
Mazzocco, M. (2008). Individual rather than household Euler equations: Identification and
estimation of individual preferences using household data. Mimeo. Duke University.
53
Mazzocco, M., and Saini, S. (2012). Testing efficient risk sharing with heterogeneous risk
preferences. American Economic Review 102: 428-468.
Mazzocco, M., Ruiz, C., and Yamaguchi, S. (2013). Labor supply, wealth dynamics, and marriage
decisions. Mimeo. University of California at Los Angeles.
Mazzocco, M., Ruiz, C., and Yamaguchi, S. (2014). Labor supply and household dynamics.
American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 104: 354-59.
McElroy, M. B. (1990). The empirical content of nash-bargained household behavior. Journal of
Human Resources 25: 559–583.
McElroy, M. B. (1997). The policy implications of family bargaining and marriage markets. In:
Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in
developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
McPeak, J.G., and Doss, C.R. (2006). Are household production decisions cooperative? Evidence on
pastoral migration and milk sales from Northern Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics 88: 525–541.
Menon, M., Pendakur K., and Perali, F. (2012). On the expenditure-dependence of children’s
resource shares. Economic Letters 117: 739-742.
Menon, M., Perali, F., and Piccoli, L. (2018). Collective consumption: an application to the passive
drinking effect. Review of Economics of the Household 16: 143.
Menon, M., Perali F., and Veronesi, M. (2014). Recovering individual preferences for non-market
goods: A collective travel-cost model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96:
438-457.
Michaud, P.C., and Vermeulen, F. (2004). A collective retirement model: identification and
estimation in the presence of externalities. Labour Economics 18 : 159-167.
Mizushima, A., and Futagami, K. (2015). Non-cooperative versus cooperative family. Journal of
Economics 114: 43-62.
Moehling, C. (2004). She has suddenly become powerful: Youth employment and household
decision-making in the early twentieth century. The Journal of Economic History 65: 414-
438.
Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Velilla, J. (2018). Intertemporal Labor Supply : A Household
Collective Approach. IZA Discussion Papers 11276, Institute of Labor Economics.
Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Velilla, J. (2018). Intra-household Wealth and Welfare Inequality
in the US : Estimations from a Collective Model of Labor Supply. IZA Discussion Papers
11707, Institute of Labor Economics.
54
Molina, J.A.,Ferrer, A. Giménez-Nadal, J.I., García-Lázaro, C., Moreno, Y. Sánchez, A.
(Forthcoming). Intergenerational cooperation within the household : a public good game
with three generations. Review of Economics of the Household.
Moreau N. (2000). Une application d'un modèle collectif d'offre de travail sur données françaises.
Économie & Prévision 146: 61-71.
Moreau, N., and Donni, O. (2002). Estimation d’un modèle collectif d’offre de travail avec taxation.
Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 65: 55-83.
Myck, M., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F.,
Lechene, V., Longobardi, E., Moreau, N., Ruiz-Castillo, J., and Vermeulen, F. (2006). The
working families’ tax credit and some European tax reforms in a collective setting. Review
of Economics of the Household 4: 129-158.
Naidoo, J. (2015). The power of tests for Pareto efficiency within the family. Mimeo. University of
Chicago.
Ortigueira, S., and Siassi, N. (2013). How important is intra-household risk sharing for savings and
labor supply? Journal of Monetary Economics 60: 650-666.
Ott, N. (1992). Intrafamily bargaining and household decisions. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., and Picard, N. (2015). Trip-timing decisions and congestion with
household scheduling preferences. Economics of Transportation 4: 118-131.
de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Inoa, I. (2014). Discrete choice decision-making with multiple
decision-makers within the household. In: Hess, S., and Daly, A. (eds). Handbook of
Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar Publishing.
de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Ziegelmeyer, A. (2011). Individual and couple decision behavior
under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. Theory and Decision 70: 45-64.
Pavoni, N. (2000). Inefficiencies in dynamic family decisions: an incomplete contracts approach to
labor supply. ChilD Working Papers (6/2000). Center for Household, Income, Labour and
Demographic Economics (ChilD)
Peluso, E., and Trannoy A. (2004). Welfare comparisons among individuals under Samuelson’s
model of households. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds). Household Behaviour, Equivalence
Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics. Physica, Heidelberg
Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1995). Sharing within families: Implications for the measurement of
poverty among individuals in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue
Canadienne d'Economique 28: 177-204.
Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1995). Social/institutional variables and behavior within households:
an empirical test using the Luxembourg income study. Feminist Economics 1: 151-174.
Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1996). Collective models of family behaviour: implications for
economic policy. Canadian Public Policy 22: 129-143.
55
Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1998). What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female
incomes on patterns of household expenditure. Economica 65: 599-613.
Picard, N., de Palma, A., and Dantan S. (2013). Intra-household discrete choice models of mode
choice and residential location. International Journal of Transport Economics 40: 419-446.
Porter, M. (2017). Spousal bargaining over care for elderly parents in China. Imbalances in sex
rations influence the allocation of support. The Journal of Development Studies 53: 514-
529.
Prabhu, V.S. (2010). Tests of intrahousehold resource allocation using a CV framework: A
comparison of husbands’ and wives’ separate and joint WTP in the slums of Navi-
Mumbai, India. World Development 38: 606-619,
Quisumbing. A.R., and Maluccio, J.A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation:
evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of
Economics and Statistics 65: 283-327.
Radtchenko, N. (2016). Welfare sharing within the households: identification from subjective well-
being data and the collective model of labor supply. Journal of Family and Economic
Issues 37: 254-271.
Rainer, H. (2007). Should we write prenuptial contracts? European Economic Review 51: 337–363.
Rapallini, C. (2004). Scelte di consumo e modello colletivo : test della razionalità colletiva e stima
della regola di ripartizione con i dati italiani. Rivista di Politica Economica 9-10 : 249-271.
Rapoport, B., Sofer, C., and Solaz, A. (2006). La production domestique dans les modèles collectifs.
Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 247-270.
Rapoport, B., Sofer, C., and Solaz, A. (2011). Household production in a collective model: some
new results. Journal of Population Economics 24: 23-45.
Rasul, I. (2008). Household bargaining over fertility: Theory and evidence from Malaysia. Journal
of Development Economics 86: 215-241.
Ray, R., and Basu K. (2002). The collective model of the household and an unexpected implication
for child labor: Hypothesis and an empirical test. Policy Research Working Papers 2813.
World Bank.
Rodriguez L. (2016). Intrahousehold inequalities in child rights and well-being. A barrier to
progress? World Development 83: 111-134.
Rubalcava, L., and Thomas, D. (2000). Family bargaining and welfare. Labor and Population
Program Working Paper Series 00-10. RAND.
Rubalcava, L., Teruel G., and Thomas, D. (2002). Welfare design, women's empowerment and
income pooling. Documento de Trabajo 244. CIDE (Centro de investigatión y docencia
económicas).
56
Sahn, D.E., and Younger, S.D. (2009). Measuring intrahousehold health inequality: explorations
using the body mass index. Health Economics 18: S13-S36.
Schultz, T.P. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of
Human Resources 25 : 599-631.
Seaton, J. (1997). Neoclassical and collective rationality in household labour supply. Applied
Economics Letters 4: 529-533.
Seaton, J. (2001). Bargaining versus non-cooperation; transaction costs within marriage. Applied
Economics Letters 8: 37-41.
Seitz, S. (2009). Accounting for racial differences in marriage and employment. Journal of Labor
Economics 27: 385-437.
Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Essays on household time allocation decisions in a collective household
model. PhD Thesis. Helsinki School of Economics.
Sinha, K. (2012). Endogenous, intra-household decision-making and its impact on the labour
supply of couples in rural India. Asian Economic Review 26: 137–157.
Siow, A. (2008). How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework. Canadian Journal
of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Économique 41: 1121-1155.
Smeulders, B., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Spieksma, F., and Talla Nobibon, F. (2015). Complexity
results for the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference for collective consumption models.
Journal of Mathematical Economics 58: 82-91
Smeulders, B., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Spieksma, F. (2015). Transitive preferences in multi-
member households. Economic Theory Bulletin 3: 243-254.
Strand, J. (2005). Individual and household values of mortality reductions with intrahousehold
bargaining. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31: 217.
Snyder, S.K. (1999). Testable restrictions of Pareto optimal public good provision. Journal of Public
Economics 71: 97-119.
Snyder, S.K. (2000). Nonparametric testable restrictions of household behavior. Southern Economic
Journal 67: 171-185.
Sofer, C., and Thibout, C. (2015). La division du travail selon le genre est-elle efficiente? Une
analyse à partir de deux enquêtes Emploi du temps. Economie et Statistique 478-479-480 :
273-304.
Sprumont, Y. (2000). On the testable implications of collective choice theories. Journal of Economic
Theory 93: 205-232.
Stieglitz, J., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., and Hopfensitz, A. (2017). Why household inefficiency? An
experimental approach to assess spousal resource distribution preferences in a
57
subsistence population undergoing socioeconomic change. Evolution and Human
Behavior 38: 71-81.
Strauss, J., Mwabu, G., and Geegle, K. (2000). Intrahousehold allocations: a review of theories and
empirical evidence. Journal of African Economies 9: 83-143.
Strauss, J., and Thomas, D. (1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family
decisions. In: Chenery, H., and T.N. Srinivasan, T.N. (eds). Handbook of Development
Economics 3 A: 1883-2023. Elsevier.
Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., Crama, F., Demuynck T., De Rock, B., and Spieksma, F. (2016).
Revealed preference tests of collectively rational consumption behavior: formulations and
algorithms. Operations Research 64: 1197–1216.
Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Sabbe, J., and Spieksma, F. (2011). Heuristics for
deciding collectively rational consumption behavior. Computational Economics 38: 173-
204.
Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household Resource Allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of
Human Resources 25 : 635-664.
Thomas, D. (1993). The distribution of income and expenditures within the household. Annals
d’Économie et de Statistique, 29 : 109-135.
Thomas, D. (1994). Like Father, Like Son: Like mother, like daughter: Parental resources and child
height. Journal of Human Resources 25 : 950-988.
Thomas, D., and Chen, C. L. (1994). Income shares and shares of income: empirical tests of models
of household resource allocations. Labor and Population Program Working Paper Series
No 94–08. RAND.
Thomas, D., Contreras, D., and Frankenberg, E. (2002). Distribution of power within the household
and child health. Mimeo. University of California at Los Angeles.
Tiefenthaler, J. (1999). The sectoral labor supply of married couples in Brazil: testing the unitary
model of household behavior. Journal of Population Economics 12: 591-606.
Tommasi, D., and Wolf, A. (2018). Overcoming weak identification in the estimation of household
resource shares. Working Papers ECARES 2016-12. Université Libre de Bruxelles
Tommasi, D., and Wolf, A. (2018). Estimating household resource shares: A shrinkage approach,
Economics Letters 163: 75-78.
Trannoy, A., and Peluso, E. (2007). Does less inequality among households mean less inequality
among individuals? Journal of Economic Theory 133: 568-578.
Trannoy, A., and Peluso, E. (2009). Poverty orderings and intra-household inequality: The Lost
Axiom. Journal of Income Distribution 18: 24-33.
58
Udry, C. (1996). Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of
Political Economy 104: 1010-1046.
Van Klaveren, C., van Praag, B., and van den Brink, H.M. (2008). A public good version of the
collective household model: an empirical approach with an application to British
household data. Review of Economics of the Household 6: 169-191.
Van Klaveren, C., and Ghysels, J. (2012). Collective labor supply and child care expenditures:
Theory and application. Journal Labor Research 33: 196.
Vermeulen, F. (2002). Collective household models: principles and main results. Journal of
Economic Surveys 16: 533-564.
Vermeulen, F. (2005). And the winner is… An empirical evaluation of unitary and collective labour
supply models. Empirical Economics 30: 711-734.
Vermeulen, F. (2006). A collective model for female labour supply with non-participation and
taxation. Journal of Population Economics 19: 99-118.
Vermeulen, F., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C.,
Laisney, F., Lechene, V., Moreau, N., Myck, M., and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2006). Collective
models of labor supply with nonconvex budget sets and non-participation: a calibration
approach. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 113-127.
Vermeulen F., and Watteyne, A. (2006). Quand un et un ne font plus deux : calcul d’échelles
d’équivalence intrafamiliales au moyen d’un modèle collectif. Actualité Économique :
Revue d’Analyse Économique 82: 53-86.
Voena, A. (2015). Yours, mine and ours: do divorce laws affect the intertemporal behavior of
married couples? American Economic Review 105: 2295-2332.
Ward-Batts, J. (2008). Out of the wallet and into the purse. Using micro data to test income pooling.
The Journal of Human Resources 43: 325-351.
Wells, R., and Maher, M. (1996). Time and surplus allocation within marriage. Research Paper No.
1372. Graduate School of Business. Stanford.
Wirl, F., and Feichtinger, G. (2002). Intrafamiliar consumption and saving under altruism and
wealth considerations. Economica, 69: 93-111.
Woolley, F.R. (1990) Economic models of family decision-making, with applications to
intergenerational justice. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science
(United Kingdom).
Xu Z. (2007). Survey of intra-household models and evidence. Mimeo. American Institutes for
Research.
Yilmazer, T., and Lich, S. (2015). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: a household bargaining
approach. Review of Economics of the Household 13: 219-241.
59
Yoon, S., and Goulias, K. (2010). The Impact of time-space prism accessibility on time use behavior
and its propagation through intra-household interaction- Transportation Letters 2, 245-
260.
Yoshida, A., and Kim, Y.-S. (2008). Sharing health risk and income risk within households:
evidence from Japanese data. Applied Economics 40: 1723-1735
Zamora, B. (2011). Does female participation affect the sharing rule? Journal of Population
Economics 24: 47-83.
Zhang, J., Kuwano, M., Lee, B., and Fujiwara, A. (2009). Modeling household discrete choice
behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms,
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43: 230-250.
Zhang, S. (2014). Wage shocks, household labor supply, and income instability. Journal of
Population Economics 27: 767-796.