Dialytic support of aki 2 final

41
Dr. Osama El-Shahat Consultant Nephrologist Head of Nephrology department-NMGH (Egypt)

Transcript of Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Page 1: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Dr. Osama El-ShahatConsultant Nephrologist

Head of Nephrology department-NMGH (Egypt)

Page 2: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

ObjectivesObjectives

When

What

HOW

to startto start ?

ModalityModality ?

can we do itcan we do it ?

Page 3: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

What is the advantages of RIFLE Criteria ?

Applying the RIFLE criteria revealed new insights.

Firstly,the RIFLE classification is feasible and fairly straightforward.

Secondly, the patients categorized as RIFLE-F had a far higher mortality than RIFLE-I and -R patients.

Max Bell et al; Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005 20:354 –360

Page 4: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Stage-based management

General Principles

Stage 1 (RiskRisk)

Risk for more severe AKI

Monitor (prevent progression)

Stage 2 (InjuryInjury)

Risk of AKI-related mortality/morbidi

ty highConservative therapy)

Stage 3 (FailureFailure)

Highest risk of death

Consider RRT Avoid subclavian catheters if possible

Discontinue all nephrotoxic agents when possible

Consider invasive diagnostic workup

Consider Renal Replacement Therapy

1 2 3

Non-invasive diagnostic workup

Ensure volume status and perfusion pressure

Check for changes in drug dosing

AKI Stage

Consider functional hemodynamic monitoring

Monitoring Serum creatinine and urine output

Consider ICU admission

Avoid hyperglycemia

Consider alternatives to radiocontrast procedures

Risk InjuryFailure

High Risk

Page 5: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

WhenWhen to startto start ?

Page 6: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Indications for RRT in critically ill AKI patients

Renal Indications

Life-threatening indications

Hyperkalemia Metabolic Acidosis Pulmonary edema Uremic omplications

Gibney et al, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008

Page 7: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Indications are open to interpretationsIndications are open to interpretations

How volume overloaded?

What is the definition of diuretic resistance?

What should potassium level be?

How severe for metabolic acidosis?

Page 8: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.1.15.1.1: InitiateInitiate RRTRRT emergentlyemergently when life-threatening changes in fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance exist.(Not Graded)

5.1.25.1.2: Consider the broaderbroader clinicalclinical contextcontext, the presence of conditions that can be modified with RRT, and trendstrends ofof laboratorylaboratory tests—rather than single BUN and creatinine thresholds alone—when making the decision to start RRT. (Not Graded)

Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 9: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

When to start RRTWhen to start RRT? ?

Crit Care Med 2008, Vol. 36, No 4 )suppl.)

Higher mortality in the early HD group

Page 10: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

When to start RRTWhen to start RRT? ?

Crit Care Med 2008, Vol. 36, No 4 )suppl.)

Early start CRRT in Post-Traumatic ARF has better survival

Page 11: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

When to start RRTWhen to start RRT? ?

Crit Care Med 2008, Vol. 36, No 4 )suppl.)

No significant differences in survival were observed

Page 12: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

When to start RRTWhen to start RRT? ?

Crit Care Med 2008, Vol. 36, No 4 )suppl.)

The sooner the ARF after surgery is recognized and CVVHDF is performed, the higher the likelihood of the reduction of the hospital mortality

Page 13: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

When to start RRTWhen to start RRT? ?

Crit Care Med 2008, Vol. 36, No 4 )suppl.)

Early RRT seems betterEarly RRT seems better

Page 14: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

WhatWhat ModalityModality

??

Page 15: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI

1. Peritoneal dialysis (PD)

2. Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD)

3. Slow Low-Efficiency Daily Dialysis (SLED)

4. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT)

• Slow Continuous Ultrafiltration (SCUFSCUF)

• Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (CVVHCVVH)

• Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis (CVVHDCVVHD)

• Continuous Venovenous Diafiltration (CVVHDFCVVHDF)

Page 16: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

AdvantagesHemodynamic stability 

Slow correction  

Easy access placement 

No Anticoagulation

Tolerated in children

Peritoneal Dialysis )PD) In AkI

DisadvantagesRisk of infectionsDifficulty to use with abdominals surgeryLogestics

Page 17: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Potential Advantages of CRRTCRRT

Homodynamic stability

Recovery of renal function

Brain edema

Biocompatibility

Removal of cytokines

Nutritional support

Correction of metabolic acidosis

Page 18: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Intermittent RRT vs Continuous RRT

Page 19: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

CVVHCVVH Avoids Hypertensive Episodes

Ronco C et al Kidney Int 56 ) suppl 72 ) s-8-s-14 , 1999Ronco C et al Kidney Int 56 ) suppl 72 ) s-8-s-14 , 1999

Page 20: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.6.2:5.6.2: We suggest using CRRT, rather

than standard intermittent RRT, for hemodynamically unstable patients. (2B)

5.6.15.6.1: Use continuous and

intermittent RRT as complementary therapies in AKI patients. (Not Graded

Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 21: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

StudyModality %recovering renal function

SUPPORTIHD*67%**

Morgera et al.CRRT90%

Ronco et al.CRRT90%

Mehta et al.IHD

CRRT59%

92%

BEST Kidney†IHD

CRRT65%

89%

Page 22: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Role of CRRTCRRT in management of ICPICP

Davenport, A Sem Dialysis, 2009Davenport, A Sem Dialysis, 2009

5.6.35.6.3: We suggest using CRRT, rather than intermittent RRT, for AKI patients with acute brain injury or other causes of increased intracranial pressure or generalized brain edema. (2B)

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 23: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

removal of Cytokine

The elimination of inflamatory mediator occurs only during the 1st hour after application of new filter.

Cytokines removal capacity of curently available membranes hardly matches the productin observed in severly affected septic patients.

De Vriese As-JAM Soc Nephrol 10-846-853 1999De Vriese As-JAM Soc Nephrol 10-846-853 1999

Page 24: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Is their an alternative to CRRT ?Is their an alternative to CRRT ?

Typically performed over 6-12 hours

Can be performed with a conventional dialysis machine

– A little less labor intensive

– Requires less training/startup

Fliser D and Kielstei JT Nat Clin Pract Nephrol, 2006

Slow Low-Efficiency Daily Dialysis )SLEDSLED)

Page 25: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Slow Low-Efficiency Daily Dialysis (SLEDSLED)

Major advantages: flexibility, reduced costs, low or absent anticoagulation

Similar adequacy and hemodynamics

One small study (16 pts) showed slightly higher acidosis and lower BP (Baldwin 2007)

VA trial (Palevsky NEJM 2008) suggests similar outcomes as CRRT and IRRT.

Vanholder et al. Critical Care 2011, 15:204

Page 26: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Mode of therapy

Principle method of solute clearance

CVVHConvection

CVVHDDiffusion

CVVHDFConvection & Diffusion

SCUFUltrafiltration (fluids)

Page 27: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

HowHow we can do itwe can do it ?

Processes of care, more pertinent to Nephrologists:-

Vascular Access

Membrane characteristics

Solution

Anticoagulation

Dose

Page 28: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.4.15.4.1: We suggest initiating RRT in patients with AKI via an uncuffed nontunneled dialysis catheter, rather than a tunneled catheter. (2D)

5.4.25.4.2: When choosing a vein for insertion of a dialysis catheter in patients with AKI, consider these preferences (Not Graded):

First choice: right jugular vein; Second choice: femoral vein; Third choice: left jugular vein; Last choice: subclavian vein with preference for the

dominant side.

Vascular access

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 29: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Lactate buffer solution

Commonly used in RRT

Under physiologic conditions, lactate is converted to

bicarbonate

Limitations :

Impairment of lactate metabolism ( liver failure)

Enhanced lactate production (severe hypoxia, sepsis)

Lactate accumulation leads to lactic acidosis (decreased

myocardial performance and hemodynamic instability)

Solutions for CRRTSolutions for CRRT

Page 30: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Bicarbonate buffer solution

Instability in the presence of calcium and magnesium

Pharmacy-made in hospitals

Recently solutions containing

bicarbonate have became available in

separated solutions that are mixed just

before use

Solutions for CRRTSolutions for CRRT

Page 31: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Bicarbonate versus lactate based fluid replacement in CVVH

Prospective, randomized study

Results : Serum lactate concentration was

significantly higher and the

bicarbonate was lower in patients

treated with lactate based solutions

Increased incidence of CVS events

in pts ttt with lactate solution

Hypotension

Increased dose of inotropic

support

barenborck and colleague

Barenbrock M et al; Kidney Int (2000

Solutions for CRRTSolutions for CRRT

Page 32: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.7.35.7.3: We suggest using bicarbonate, rather than

lactate, as a buffer in dialysate and replacement

fluid for RRT in patients with AKI and liver

failure and/or lactic acidemia. (2B)

Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 33: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

TheThe MembraneMembrane

High Flux membrane , synthetic , biocompatable ,

acting by providing both methods of detoxications:

a)Diffusion : for low molecular weight toxins.

b)Convection : for large molecules.

5.5.15.5.1: We suggest to use dialyzers with a biocompatible

membrane for IHD and CRRT in patients with

AKI. (2C)

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 34: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Modality AdvantagesDisadvantages

HeparinGood anticoagulation Thrombocytopenia bleeding

LMWHLess thrombocytopeniableeding

Citrate Lowest risk of bleedingMetabolic alkalosis,

hypocalcemia special dialysate

Regional Heparin

Reduced bleedingComplex management

Saline flushes No bleeding risk Poor efficacy

Prostacycline Reduced bleeding riskHypotension poor efficacy

Page 35: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.3.2.15.3.2.1: For anticoagulation in intermittent RRT, we

recommend using either unfractionated or

low-molecular weight heparin, rather

than other anticoagulants. (1C)

5.3.2.25.3.2.2: For anticoagulation in CRRT, we suggest

using regional citrate anticoagulation

rather than heparin in patients who do not

have contraindications for citrate. (2B)

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 36: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Dose Dose

RCT of 1124 critically ill pts with AKI and sepsis or at least one organ failure to intensive or less intensive renal-replacement therapy

Hemodynamically unstable pts received CRRT or SLEDD, stable pts IRRT

Intensive RRT= IRRT or SLEDD 6x/wk or CRRT at 35 ml/kg/hr

Less intensive RRT= IRRT or SLED 3x/wk or CRRT at 20 ml/kg/hr

VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network. (NEJM 2008;359:7):

Optimal intensity of RRT is controversial

Page 37: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network. (NEJM 2008;359:7):

No difference in mortality

Page 38: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

1508 Critically ill patients with ARF on CVVHF were randomized to:- lowlow (25 mL/kg/hr – 747 patients) highhigh intensity (40 mL/kg/hr – 761 patients) effluent

rates.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1627-38

The RENAL Replacement Therapy Study

There was no difference in 90 day mortality rate (44.7%) or the need for RRT at 90 day between the two treatment groups.

Page 39: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

5.8.15.8.1: The dose of RRT to be delivered should be

prescribed before starting each session of RRT.

(Not Graded)

We recommend frequent assessment of the actual

delivered dose in order to adjust the prescription.

(1B)

5.8.25.8.2: Provide RRT to achieve the goals of electrolyte,

acid-base, solute, and fluid balance that will

meet the patient’s needs. (Not Graded)

KDIGO® AKI Guideline March 2012

Page 40: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Data from high quality RCTs are lackingThe current trend is to provide RRT earlierThere may be a recovery advantage to using

CRRT vs. HD for initial management of AKI but no difference on mrtalitaty

Dose: No benefit to “intensive” therapy

Dialytic Support of Dialytic Support of AKI =AKI =

ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions

IndividualizatiIndividualizationon

Page 41: Dialytic support of aki 2 final

Thank you Thank you